STOCK TITAN

DBV Technologies Highlights New Data from the VITESSE Phase 3 Study of the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch in Children Ages 4-7 Years

(Moderate)

Sentiment and the balance of points

Rhea-AI Sentiment reads the wording of the document, how positive or negative its language is on a 1 to 5 scale. The balance of points shown with the takes weighs what the document actually discloses, so the two can disagree, for example when a trial that missed its main goal is described in upbeat language.

DBV Technologies (DBVT) presented additional Phase 3 VITESSE results for its VIASKIN Peanut Patch in peanut-allergic children aged 4–7 years.

The trial randomized 654 children to the patch or placebo for 12 months. It met its primary endpoint: 46.6% of patch recipients met responder criteria versus 14.8% with placebo (p<0.001). New analyses showed lower maximum reaction severity during month-12 food challenges (p=0.004). At or below participants’ baseline reaction-triggering dose, 52.7% of patch recipients had no symptoms versus 19.2% with placebo; moderate or severe reactions occurred in 14.0% versus 50.0%.

Peanut-specific antibody levels and skin-test responses also changed with treatment. Mean patch-treatment compliance was 96.1%, without protocol restrictions on daily activities or other medications. The findings were presented at the 2026 ACAAI Annual Scientific Meeting.

Loading...
Loading translation...
13 points · 1 major

How this balance works

Rhea-AI gives every point it takes from this document a weight. Minor counts 1, Moderate 3 and Major 9, so one Major point outweighs several Minor ones. The bar adds up the weights on each side, and when neither side holds more than 65% of the total the balance reads Mixed.

It reads the document as published, with the same rules for every company, and it does not look at what the market expected or at how the stock traded, so a point can be objectively good on a day the stock falls.

Rhea-AI Sentiment measures something else, the tone of the wording.

0 major · 0 points

How the balance works

Positive

  • Major pointMonth-12 primary endpoint met: responder rates were 46.6% with VIASKIN versus 14.8% with placebo (p<0.001).
  • Moderate pointMonth-12 maximum reaction severity was lower with VIASKIN versus placebo during food challenges (p=0.004).
  • Minor pointSevere challenge reactions occurred in 8.4% with VIASKIN versus 12.5% with placebo at month 12.
  • Minor pointNo or mild challenge symptoms occurred in 12.5% with VIASKIN versus 1.5% with placebo at month 12.
  • Minor pointNo symptoms at or below baseline reaction-triggering doses: 52.7% with VIASKIN versus 19.2% with placebo at month 12.
8 minor points
  • Minor pointModerate or severe reactions at or below baseline reaction-triggering doses: 14.0% versus 50.0% with placebo at month 12.
  • Minor pointPeanut-specific IgG4 antibody levels increased by month 3 with VIASKIN and remained elevated through month 12.
  • Minor pointMedian peanut-specific and Ara 2-specific IgE antibody levels were lower with VIASKIN versus placebo at month 12 (p=0.001).
  • Minor pointSkin-test reaction diameter decreased versus placebo at month 12; least-squares mean ratio was 0.74 (p<0.0001).
  • Minor pointMean treatment compliance was 96.1% with VIASKIN and 96.5% with placebo.
  • Minor pointPatch removal was rated easy or very easy by 83.4% with VIASKIN versus 84.8% with placebo.
  • Minor pointPatch removal was rated not painful by 71.9% with VIASKIN versus 70.2% with placebo.
  • Minor pointDaily activities and other medication use required no restrictions under the study protocol.

Negative

  • None.

Key Figures

Study enrollment: 654 children Peanut protein dose: 250 µg Treatment responder rate: 46.6% vs. 14.8%; difference 31.8%; 95% CI: 24.5%–39.0%; p<0.001 +5 more
Study enrollment
654 children
VITESSE Phase 3 study
Peanut protein dose
250 µg
VIASKIN Peanut Patch treatment arm
Treatment responder rate
46.6% vs. 14.8%; difference 31.8%; 95% CI: 24.5%–39.0%; p<0.001
VIASKIN vs. placebo at month 12; primary endpoint
Maximum symptom severity
p=0.004
Lower with VIASKIN than placebo at the month 12 food challenge
Severe reactions
8.4% vs. 12.5%
VIASKIN vs. placebo at month 12
No symptoms
52.7% vs. 19.2%
VIASKIN vs. placebo at or below baseline eliciting dose
Moderate or severe reactions
14.0% vs. 50.0%
VIASKIN vs. placebo at or below baseline eliciting dose
Mean treatment compliance
96.1% vs. 96.5%
VIASKIN vs. placebo

Previous Clinical trial Reports

2 past events · Latest: Feb 28
Same Type 2 events
  1. Feb 28

    Phase 3 data

    24h Move
    +10.8%

    Additional VITESSE data reiterated positive primary-endpoint responder results.

  2. Dec 16

    Phase 3 results

    24h Move
    +25.4%

    VITESSE topline results met the primary endpoint, with higher responder rates on treatment.

24h Move is the share-price change in the day after each event; other market factors may also have contributed.

Key Terms

epicutaneous immunotherapy, igg4, ige, skin-prick-test
4 terms
epicutaneous immunotherapy medical
"using epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT)"
Epicutaneous immunotherapy is a treatment that delivers tiny, controlled doses of an allergen through a patch applied to the skin to retrain the immune system and reduce allergic reactions over time. Think of it as a slow, measured exposure training the body to tolerate a trigger rather than avoiding it entirely. Investors watch this approach because it represents a potentially safer, easier-to-administer alternative to injections or pills, with implications for market size, regulatory approval, and long-term treatment adoption in allergy therapeutics.
igg4 medical
"increased peanut-specific IgG4"
IgG4 is a specific subtype of antibody the immune system makes; antibodies are proteins that identify and bind to foreign substances. Think of IgG4 as a specialized model of a tool that behaves differently from other antibodies—sometimes calming inflammation and sometimes signaling particular allergic or autoimmune conditions. For investors, IgG4 matters because its levels can drive demand for diagnostics, influence the course or approval of drugs and biologics, and serve as a clinical or safety signal that affects biotech and healthcare valuations.
ige medical
"decreased peanut-specific IgE"
IgE (immunoglobulin E) is a type of antibody the immune system makes in response to allergens and certain parasites; it acts like a sensor that triggers allergy reactions when it binds to a allergen. For investors, IgE levels matter because many allergy and asthma drugs, diagnostics, or tests are designed to reduce or measure IgE activity—so changes in IgE can indicate whether a treatment is likely to work or how a product might be used in the market.
skin-prick-test medical
"skin-prick-test wheal diameter"
A diagnostic procedure for immediate (IgE‑mediated) allergic reactions in which tiny amounts of suspected allergens are placed on the skin—usually the forearm or back—and the skin is lightly pricked so the allergen enters the outer skin layer; a positive result is a raised, itchy bump (wheal and flare) appearing within about 15–20 minutes. It identifies sensitization to specific airborne, food, or venom allergens but does not measure severity of clinical allergy, can be affected by recent antihistamine use or certain skin conditions, and is distinct from intradermal or patch testing which use different techniques and timing.

AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

See more from StockTitan in Google Search and AI answers. Adds StockTitan as a preferred source · opens Google
Add on Google

Châtillon, France, November 12, 2026

DBV Technologies Highlights New Data from the VITESSE Phase 3 Study of the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch in Children Ages 4-7 Years

  • Additional VITESSE data being presented at 2026 ACAAI Annual Scientific Meeting support safety and efficacy findings from the phase 3 study, and assess potential practical aspects of daily use if approved
  • VIASKIN® Peanut Patch treatment was associated with statistically significant reductions in reaction severity during the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges after 12 months, including reductions when reactions were assessed at or below participants’ baseline eliciting dose
  • Mean treatment compliance was 96.1%; most study participants reported patches were easy and not painful to remove, and no restrictions on daily activities or concomitant medications were required in the study protocol
  • VITESSE participants receiving the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch had immunologic changes consistent with allergen immunotherapy, including increased peanut-specific IgG4 and decreased peanut-specific IgE, Ara h 2 IgE and skin-prick-test wheal diameter


DBV Technologies (Euronext: DBV – ISIN: FR0010417345 – Nasdaq Stock Market: DBVT), a late-stage biopharmaceutical company, today announced that new data from the successful Phase 3 VITESSE clinical trial of the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch in peanut-allergic children aged 4 to 7 years were highlighted in three presentations at the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI) 2026 Annual Scientific Meeting in Phoenix, Arizona. The three presentations evaluate changes in allergic reaction severity during double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges, the potential practicality of the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch using epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT), and changes to immunologic biomarkers during the 12-month VITESSE study.

VITESSE, the largest food allergy immunotherapy trial to date, randomized 654 children 2:1 to receive the VIASKIN Peanut Patch containing 250 µg of peanut protein (VP250) or placebo for 12 months. The study met its primary endpoint, with 46.6% of children in the VIASKIN Peanut Patch arm meeting treatment responder criteria at month 12 compared with 14.8% in the placebo arm (difference in response rates = 31.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.5%, 39.0%; p<0.001).

“The VITESSE data presented at ACAAI add important context to the study’s overall positive results,” said Pharis Mohideen, M.D., Chief Medical Officer of DBV Technologies. “After one year of treatment, children receiving the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch in the study had statistically significantly lower maximum symptom severity during food challenge, along with immunologic changes consistent with other forms of allergen immunotherapy. I am also pleased that the practicality data show high treatment compliance in young children with common atopic comorbidities, and that all participants were able to continue their typical daily activities, including bathing, sports and swimming, while on treatment.”

Highlights from the VITESSE data presented at ACAAI 2026:
“Changes in Reaction Severity Following Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Children with Peanut Allergy”

  • At the month 12 double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), maximum symptom severity was significantly lower with the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch versus placebo (p=0.004). Severe reactions occurred in 8.4% of VIASKIN treated participants versus 12.5% of placebo participants; 12.5% of VIASKIN treated participants had no or mild symptoms versus 1.5% with placebo.
  • When reactions at month 12 were evaluated at or below each participant’s baseline eliciting dose, 52.7% of VIASKIN treated participants had no symptoms versus 19.2% with placebo, while moderate or severe reactions occurred in 14.0% of VIASKIN treated participants versus 50.0% with placebo.


“Immunologic Changes in VITESSE: A 12-Month Study of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Children with Peanut Allergy”

  • Peanut-specific IgG4 increased by month 3 with the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch and remained elevated through month 12
  • At month 12, median peanut-specific IgE and Ara 2-specific IgE were significantly lower with the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch versus placebo (p=0.001).
  • Mean skin-prick-test wheal diameter decreased significantly with the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch versus placebo at month 12 (least-squares mean ratio: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.79; p<0.0001).
  • VIASKIN® Peanut Patch treatment for one year resulted in statistically significant greater responder rates versus placebo and immunomodulatory changes consistent with other forms of allergen immunotherapy.


“Practicality of Daily Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Young Children with Peanut Allergy”

  • Mean treatment compliance was high in both groups (96.1% with the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch and 96.5% with placebo).
  • Most patches were rated by participants as “very easy” or “easy” to remove (83.4% with the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch; 84.8% with placebo) and “not painful” to remove (71.9% with the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch; 70.2% with placebo).
  • Participants continued typical daily activities, including bathing/showering, play, sports and swimming, with no restrictions on daily activities or concomitant medication use required during the study.
  • Atopic comorbidities were common among VITESSE participants, including atopic dermatitis, other food allergies and asthma.


“When I work with families in the clinic, the treatment conversations are not just about safety and efficacy, but practical considerations such as time commitment, how a treatment might fit into family life and family routines, and impact on the child,” said Edwin H. Kim, M.D., Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. “These additional data from VITESSE are clinically meaningful and I believe support the potential of the VIASKIN® Peanut Patch to be integrated into the daily routines of children living with peanut allergy, if approved.”

The presentations will be made available on the Scientific Publications & Presentations page on the Company’s website following presentation at the meeting.

About DBV Technologies
DBV Technologies is a late-stage biopharmaceutical company developing treatment options for food allergies and other immunologic conditions with significant unmet medical need. DBV is currently focused on investigating the use of its proprietary VIASKIN® patch technology to address food allergies, which are caused by a hypersensitive immune reaction and characterized by a range of symptoms varying in severity from mild to life-threatening anaphylaxis. Millions of people live with food allergies, including young children. Through epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT), the VIASKIN® patch is designed to introduce microgram amounts of a biologically active compound to the immune system through intact skin. EPIT is a new class of non-invasive treatment that seeks to modify an individual’s underlying allergy by re-educating the immune system to become desensitized to allergen by leveraging the skin’s immune tolerizing properties. DBV is committed to transforming the care of food allergic people. The Company’s food allergy programs include ongoing clinical trials of VIASKIN Peanut in peanut allergic toddlers (1 through 3 years of age) and children (4 through 7 years of age).

DBV Technologies is headquartered in Châtillon, France, with North American operations in Warren, NJ. The Company’s ordinary shares are traded on segment B of Euronext Paris (Ticker: DBV, ISIN code: FR0010417345) and the Company’s ADSs (each representing five ordinary shares) are traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market (Ticker: DBVT; CUSIP: 23306J309).

For more information, please visit www.dbv-technologies.com and engage with us on X (formerly Twitter) and LinkedIn.

VIASKIN is a registered trademark of DBV Technologies.

Forward Looking Statements
This press release may contain forward-looking statements, including statements regarding the therapeutic potential of VIASKIN® Peanut patch and EPIT, designs of DBV’s anticipated clinical trials, DBV’s planned regulatory and clinical efforts including timing and results of communications with regulatory agencies, clinical trial data release and publications, , and the ability of any of DBV’s product candidates, if approved, to improve the lives of patients with food allergies. These forward-looking statements and estimates are not promises or guarantees and involve substantial risks and uncertainties. At this stage, DBV’s product candidates have not been authorized for sale in any country. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described or projected herein include uncertainties associated generally with research and development, clinical trials and related regulatory reviews and approvals, and DBV’s ability to successfully execute on its budget discipline measures. A further list and description of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements in this press release can be found in DBV’s regulatory filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including in DBV’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on March 26, 2026, as amended by the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on April 30, 2026, DBV’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 28, 2026, and future filings and reports made with the SEC by DBV. Existing and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and estimates, which speak only as of the date hereof. Other than as required by applicable law, DBV Technologies undertakes no obligation to update or revise the information contained in this Press Release.

Investor Contact
Virginie Boucinha
DBV Technologies
Virginie.Boucinha@dbv-technologies.com

Media Contact
Brett Whelan
DBV Technologies
brett.whelan@dbv-technologies.com

Attachment


FAQ

AI-generated questions and answers. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

Did DBV Technologies’ VITESSE peanut patch trial meet its primary endpoint?

VITESSE met its primary endpoint, with 46.6% of VIASKIN Peanut Patch recipients meeting responder criteria at month 12 versus 14.8% with placebo. The difference in response rates was 31.8%, with a 95% confidence interval of 24.5% to 39.0% (p<0.001).

What did DBVT’s new VITESSE data show about peanut reaction severity?

Maximum symptom severity was lower with VIASKIN than placebo during month-12 food challenges (p=0.004). At or below participants’ baseline reaction-triggering dose, 52.7% of patch recipients had no symptoms versus 19.2% with placebo, while moderate or severe reactions occurred in 14.0% versus 50.0%.

Keep reading