R2 Semiconductor Outlines Next Steps Following Chip IP Victory Over Intel in Germany

Rhea-AI Summary

R2 Semiconductor wins intellectual property victory against Intel in Germany over patent infringement, leading to an injunction on Intel, Dell, HP, and HPE. Intel faces challenges in appealing the decision and validity of the patent, potentially impacting its server business. R2 is prepared to enforce the injunction through 2025 and considers further enforcement steps in Europe.

Legal Expert

The court ruling in favor of R2 Semiconductor over Intel represents a significant development in the realm of intellectual property law, particularly in the technology sector. The injunction issued by the Düsseldorf Regional Court not only halts Intel's ability to sell, import, or manufacture the infringing server chips in Germany, but it also extends to Intel's customers, which include major players like Dell, HP and HPE. This decision underscores the strength of European patent protections and could set a precedent for similar cases, especially considering the court's preliminary opinion on the patent's validity.

For Intel and its customers, this ruling may prompt a reassessment of supply chain and product strategy, potentially spurring innovation as they seek alternatives to the patented technology. The requirement for Intel to redesign its chips could lead to a substantial shift in server technology, possibly impacting performance and reliability. This situation may also encourage other companies to more vigorously defend their intellectual property rights in the European market, potentially leading to increased litigation and a more cautious approach to integrating technology that could infringe on existing patents.

Financial Analyst

The financial implications of this legal development are considerable for Intel and its stakeholders. With the server business being a significant contributor to Intel's revenue, the injunction could disrupt a substantial portion of its sales in the German market. The cost of redesigning the chip, which could run into billions, coupled with the potential for inferior performance of alternative technologies, may negatively impact Intel's financial performance and market position in the short to medium term.

Intel's stockholders should monitor the progress of the legal proceedings closely, including the outcome of Intel's validity challenge to the patent in the German Patent Court. The uncertainty surrounding the case and its potential to affect Intel's operations in a key market like Germany could introduce volatility to Intel's stock price. Additionally, the ripple effect on Intel's customers who rely on the infringing technology could have broader implications for the tech industry's supply chain and competitive dynamics.

Market Research Analyst

The injunction against Intel and its implications for the server market could reverberate through the technology sector, potentially altering market shares and competitive positioning. Competitors may capitalize on Intel's inability to sell certain server chips in Germany by offering alternative solutions, which could lead to shifts in market dynamics. This situation may also accelerate the adoption of competing technologies or spur investment in new, non-infringing innovations.

For the broader server market, this development could influence trends in power consumption, performance standards and reliability benchmarks. It may also prompt a reevaluation of risk management strategies, with companies seeking to diversify their technological dependencies to mitigate the impact of similar injunctions in the future. The outcome of this case could also influence patent filing and litigation strategies, as firms seek to protect their innovations while avoiding infringement on existing patents.

PALO ALTO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- R2 Semiconductor last week scored an important intellectual property victory when the Düsseldorf Regional Court ruled that Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC) infringed on R2’s European patent for integrated voltage regulation technology. In doing so, the court also issued an injunction prohibiting Intel in Germany from selling, importing or making chips with the infringing technology, which is especially prominent in Intel’s server business. The injunction also applies to Intel customers Dell, HP and HPE, since they use Intel’s infringing technology.

Today, R2 addressed the next steps and key questions following Intel’s loss in the highly respected German court.

Five Questions Following German Court Decision Against Intel

Q: What happens next in this dispute?

A: In Germany, R2 is fully prepared to enforce the injunction granted by the court against Intel, Dell, HP and HPE to protect our valuable intellectual property, including posting the required bonds. It seems that Intel has appealed, but in Germany, courts do not typically stay the injunction during such appeals – which means the injunction would remain in place through 2025, at a minimum. Additionally, Intel is pursuing a validity challenge to the patent in the German Patent Court, which will be finalized later this year. But, as Intel recognizes in its most recent 10-K, that Court has already given its preliminary opinion that the R2 patent is valid.

In addition to the pending litigation on the same patent in the UK (in which an injunction is also sought), R2 is also considering whether additional enforcement steps may be required elsewhere; after all, R2’s patent is a European patent, and therefore protects its rights Europe-wide. And, the patent involved is a different one than the one Intel challenged in the U.S. several years ago, so the prior litigation history really has nothing to do with Intel’s current predicament.

Q: Can’t Intel just remove the technology from its chips?

A: Very unlikely. The infringing technology is integral to the processor chip and removing it would likely require redesigning the whole chip. That process typically takes years, and costs billions of dollars. Plus, the alternate technologies available to Intel are inferior, and lead effectively to increased power consumption by the chip, lower and/or volatile performance, and lower mean time to failure. Each of those is very bad, especially for computer servers.

Q: Is this a big deal for Intel?

A: The infringing technology is mainly used in servers – a huge business for Intel. In 2022, for example, Intel earned global revenues of $63.6 billion. Of that number about $31 billion is attributable to servers. If the company can’t make, sell or import chips for that business in Germany and other parts of Europe – and HP, HPE and Dell can’t use them -- it’s a big deal. Plus,

Intel last spring announced plans to invest more than 30 billion euros to build a chip manufacturing site in the German city of Magdeburg. The injunction may very well affect that investment.

Q: Isn’t the injunction only limited to a few products?

A: Intel seems to be saying that the injunction is limited to the four chip families the German court discussed in its opinion. That is not so; in fact, the German court prohibited Intel (and Dell, HP and HPE) from infringing the patent, by any means – the injunction is not just for the four families, it covers any chips that infringe in the same way. So, any Intel chip that has similar integrated voltage regulating technology will be subject to the injunction. Intel revises chips each year and introduces a new generation annually, but each chip is largely a derivative of the previous generation with incremental changes.

Intel (and Dell, HP and HPE) must provide R2 with a list of all such processors in the coming weeks, so we will be able to more precisely identify the many chip families impacted. So, newer chips like those in its 13^th and 14^th generation (e.g., Raptor Lake) may very well be within the scope of the injunction.

Q: Is R2 is a “patent troll,” a “shell company,” or a serial litigant?

A: No. A patent troll is an entity that obtains patents for the purpose of suing or licensing, and never practices its own technology. In contrast, R2 is a well-established, 15-year-old, California-based tech firm that invented the integrated voltage regulation technology. Even today, it continues to develop the technology, and works with some of the leading tech companies in the world in the process. Its business model is like that of other public companies, such as ARM, which licenses designs just like R2.

Intel is intimately familiar with R2’s chip IP development business —in fact, the companies were in the final stages of an investment by Intel into R2 in 2015 when Intel unilaterally terminated the process, and Intel (and its downstream customers, HPE and Dell) are the only entities R2 has ever accused of violating its patents. Years before that, in 2011, Intel actually filed a patent application for the same invention R2 patented in 2009. Intel later pulled the patent application during the U.S. litigation.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240212968186/en/

Media Contact

Rubenstein

Steve Murray

631-697-5621

smurray@rubenstein.com

Source: R2 Semiconductor

FAQ

What was the recent intellectual property victory for R2 Semiconductor against Intel in Germany?

R2 Semiconductor won an important intellectual property victory in Germany over patent infringement, resulting in an injunction against Intel, Dell, HP, and HPE.

What are the next steps in the dispute between R2 Semiconductor and Intel?

R2 Semiconductor is prepared to enforce the injunction in Germany through 2025, considering further enforcement steps in Europe, and addressing validity challenges to the patent.

Why is it unlikely for Intel to remove the infringing technology from its chips?

Removing the technology integral to the processor chip would require redesigning the whole chip, a process that takes years and costs billions of dollars, with inferior alternate technologies leading to increased power consumption, lower performance, and lower mean time to failure.

How significant is the impact of the infringement on Intel's business?

The infringing technology is mainly used in Intel's server business, a significant revenue source amounting to $63.6 billion in 2022, potentially impacting performance and power consumption in computer servers.

What are the implications of the German court's decision on Intel's market presence?

The injunction against Intel in Germany could have lasting effects on its market presence, especially in the server business, as the infringing technology is crucial for chip performance.

What are the potential consequences for Intel customers like Dell, HP, and HPE?

Intel customers using the infringing technology, such as Dell, HP, and HPE, are also subject to the injunction, impacting their ability to sell or import chips with the technology.

How does the European patent protection impact R2 Semiconductor's rights?

R2 Semiconductor's European patent provides protection across Europe, allowing the company to enforce its intellectual property rights in various jurisdictions.

What are the financial implications of the patent infringement for Intel?

The patent infringement could have financial implications for Intel, particularly in its server business, where the technology is extensively used.

What are the challenges Intel faces in appealing the court's decision?

Intel faces challenges in appealing the court's decision, as the injunction could remain in place through 2025, impacting its operations in Germany and potentially beyond.

How does the court's preliminary opinion on the patent validity affect the ongoing dispute?

The court's preliminary opinion on the validity of the patent could influence the outcome of the dispute, as Intel seeks to challenge the patent's validity in the German Patent Court.

What distinguishes the current patent litigation from Intel's previous challenges in the U.S.?

The current patent litigation in Germany involves a different patent from Intel's previous challenges in the U.S., indicating a separate legal issue for the company.

What are the potential risks for Intel's server business due to the injunction?

The injunction against Intel could pose risks to its server business, affecting chip performance and potentially leading to market disruptions.

How does R2 Semiconductor plan to protect its intellectual property following the court's decision?

R2 Semiconductor is prepared to enforce the injunction and consider additional enforcement steps to safeguard its intellectual property rights.

What are the implications of the infringement on Intel's technology roadmap?

The infringement could impact Intel's technology roadmap, as the removal of the infringing technology may require significant redesign efforts and cost investments.

How does the injunction affect Intel's competitive position in the market?

The injunction could impact Intel's competitive position in the market, particularly in the server business, where the infringing technology plays a crucial role.

What are the potential consequences for Intel's revenue streams following the court's decision?

The court's decision could have implications for Intel's revenue streams, especially in the server business segment, where the infringing technology is extensively utilized.