STOCK TITAN

VoIP-Pal Files Second Amended Complaints in Federal Court and Serves Defendants

Rhea-AI Impact
(Neutral)
Rhea-AI Sentiment
(Very Negative)
Tags

VoIP-Pal (OTCQB: VPLM) has announced the filing and service of two Second Amended Complaints in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile. The legal action, detailed in a new CEO CFO Magazine article featuring CEO Emil Malak, outlines allegations of forced tying, deceptive 'no charge' marketing, and unauthorized deployment of DID-based routing systems.

The complaints consist of a standalone filing and a nationwide class action, seeking $628.41 billion in alleged damages under RICO, Antitrust, and Telecommunications law. The claims center on structural fraud and consumer deception, with the article providing insights into the legal proceedings and judicial trajectory.

Loading...
Loading translation...

Positive

  • Massive potential damages of $628.41 billion if litigation succeeds
  • Nationwide class action increases chances of settlement or favorable outcome
  • Legal action targets major telecom companies with substantial resources

Negative

  • Uncertain litigation outcome against powerful telecom companies
  • Legal proceedings could be lengthy and costly
  • No guarantee of damages being awarded

News Market Reaction 1 Alert

-2.02% News Effect

On the day this news was published, VPLM declined 2.02%, reflecting a moderate negative market reaction.

Data tracked by StockTitan Argus on the day of publication.

CEO Emil Malak discusses the litigation strategy and consumer impact in a newly published article featured in CEO CFO Magazine

WACO, Texas, April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- VoIP-Pal.com Inc. (“VoIP-Pal,” “Company”) (OTCQB: VPLM), announced that it has filed and served two Second Amended Complaints in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile.

A recently published article in CEO CFO Magazine features an in-depth Q&A with VoIP-Pal CEO Emil Malak and provides a comprehensive overview of the Company’s two Second Amended Complaints. The CEOCFO Magazine article captures the essence of both Second Amended Complaints—highlighting the core allegations of forced tying, deceptive ‘no charge’ marketing, and unauthorized deployment of DID-based routing systems, while summarizing the Court’s procedural trajectory and the $628.41 billion in alleged damages under RICO, Antitrust, and Telecommunications law.

In clear terms, the CEOCFO article distills the main causes of action in both filings—VoIP-Pal’s standalone complaint and the nationwide class action—while outlining the legal stakes, judicial path ahead, and the historic scope of damages rooted in structural fraud and consumer deception. Access the article and Q&A at the following link: CEOCFO Magazine article.

About the Second Amended Complaints

The first complaint, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-cv-03051 RDM, is brought by VoIP-Pal individually, asserting claims under antitrust, RICO, and telecommunications law related to exclusion from the Wi-Fi Calling market and the alleged unauthorized use of the company’s patented call routing system. The second, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-03054 RDM, is a nationwide class action, filed on behalf of approximately 373 million U.S. mobile subscribers, alleging systemic overbilling and deceptive bundling of services.

“These filings represent a major step forward in protecting both our intellectual property and the interests of American mobile subscribers,” said VoIP-Pal CEO Emil Malak. “We are committed to pursuing these claims through the proper legal channels.”

Both complaints are available on the Company’s website www.voip-palusa.com and via the links below:

About VoIP-Pal.com Inc.
VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) is a publicly traded corporation (OTCQB: VPLM) headquartered in Waco, TX. The company owns a portfolio of patents related to Voice-over-Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) technology that it is actively seeking to monetize.

Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements as defined under securities laws. These statements reflect management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Litigation outcomes and settlement discussions are unpredictable, and there is no assurance of favorable resolution.

For Further Information
Corporate Website: www.voip-palusa.com
IR Inquiries: IR@voip-pal.com
IR Contact: Rich Inza, (954) 495-4600


FAQ

What is the total amount in damages VoIP-Pal (VPLM) is seeking in its lawsuits against telecom giants?

VoIP-Pal is seeking $628.41 billion in damages under RICO, Antitrust, and Telecommunications law through its complaints against AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile.

What are the main allegations in VoIP-Pal's (VPLM) Second Amended Complaints?

The main allegations include forced tying, deceptive 'no charge' marketing practices, and unauthorized deployment of DID-based routing systems.

Which telecom companies are named as defendants in VoIP-Pal's (VPLM) District of Columbia lawsuit?

AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile are named as defendants in the lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

How many separate complaints has VoIP-Pal (VPLM) filed in this legal action?

VoIP-Pal has filed two Second Amended Complaints: a standalone complaint and a nationwide class action.
Voip Palcom

OTC:VPLM

VPLM Rankings

VPLM Latest News

VPLM Latest SEC Filings

VPLM Stock Data

34.93M
3.40B
5.67%
0.01%
Telecom Services
Communication Services
Link
United States
Waco