STOCK TITAN

Short Interest Decreases — Positions Being Covered

US-listed companies whose reported short position fell the most between the two most recent FINRA settlement files. A fall is consistent with covering and equally with a share base that changed underneath the count, so the marked rows matter as much as the ranking.
Settlement Sep 15, 2026
next publication (FINRA schedule) Oct 9, 2026
data 13 days old
Reporting period September 2026
Direction Falling short interest
Page 1 of 18

Swipe the table sideways for more columns.

What these columns measure
Short Interest Change
How far the reported short position moved between the two most recent FINRA settlement files. The share counts under each percentage are the two positions it was computed from.
Split in period
A share split that took effect between the two settlement dates puts the two counts on different share bases, so the percentage measures the rebase rather than any trading. Those rows are struck through and marked, never adjusted, because a heuristic correction here is a number nobody can verify.
SI % of Float*
Shares sold short measured against the shares actually available to trade. Where no reliable float exists the position is measured against shares outstanding instead and the row says "of outstanding", because the same position reads lower on the wider denominator.
Days to Cover
Shares sold short divided by average daily volume: how many days of ordinary trading buying the position back would take. FINRA floors the value at 1.00 whenever average daily volume already exceeds the position, so those rows read "1 day or less" rather than stating a precision the source withheld.
Why a cell shows a dash
A percentage is withheld rather than guessed whenever its denominator cannot be trusted: the security class publishes no float, the share-count sources disagree, a split leaves the basis uncertain, the settlement file reports no position, or the computed percentage failed the reliability check. The raw share counts stay visible in every one of those cases.
Rank
Symbol
Company Name
Short Interest Change
SI % of Float*
Days to Cover
Market Cap
Country
Sector
1
-92.88%
827K → 59K
—
—
$641.18M
United States
Financial Services
2
-89.90%
1.5M → 154K
0.30%
1 day or less
$13.17M
China
Industrials
3
-86.93%
371K → 48K
—
—
$69.76M
United States
Financial Services
4
-86.92%
424K → 55K
—
—
$11.09M
China
Industrials
5
-86.03%
1.7M → 231K
—
—
$10.67M
United States
Financial Services
6
-85.90%
519K → 73K
—
—
$153.58M
United States
Technology
7
-85.30%
1.8M → 269K
—
—
$52.71M
United States
Healthcare
8
-80.71%
175K → 34K
—
—
$127.19M
United States
Financial Services
9
-78.94%
484K → 102K
—
—
$42.79M
China
Financial Services
10
-77.26%
179K → 41K
—
—
$399.54M
United States
Financial Services
11
-76.12%
392K → 94K
—
—
$64.30M
China
Consumer Cyclical
12
-76.02%
527K → 126K
—
—
$12.91M
United States
Healthcare
13
-75.70%
350K → 85K
—
—
$10.98M
United States
Technology
14
-75.23%
303K → 75K
—
—
$10.64M
United States
Technology
15
-74.89%
747K → 188K
—
—
$15.13M
United States
Technology
16
-72.34%
109K → 30K
—
—
$202.23M
United States
Financial Services
17
-70.01%
244K → 73K
—
—
$11.88M
Japan
Consumer Defensive
18
-68.91%
108K → 34K
—
—
$309.31M
United States
Financial Services
19
-68.74%
242K → 76K
—
—
$12.11M
United States
Healthcare
20
-67.92%
239K → 77K
—
—
$18.65M
Japan
Industrials
21
-67.32%
201K → 66K
—
—
$14.90M
United Kingdom
Technology
22
-66.95%
253K → 84K
—
—
$49.00M
United States
Healthcare
23
-65.08%
114K → 40K
—
—
$22.70M
United States
Healthcare
24
-64.95%
149K → 52K
—
—
$298.35M
United States
Financial Services
25
-64.64%
171K → 60K
—
—
$96.15M
China
Healthcare
26
-64.31%
233K → 83K
—
—
$1.04B
United States
Financial Services
27
-61.94%
141K → 54K
—
—
$45.43M
United States
Consumer Defensive
28
-61.74%
88K → 34K
—
—
$818.71M
Sweden
Consumer Cyclical
29
-61.62%
109K → 42K
—
—
$13.88M
Malaysia
Technology
30
-61.07%
103K → 40K
—
—
$32.02M
China
Consumer Defensive
31
-59.78%
120K → 48K
—
—
$10.45M
Israel
Healthcare
32
-58.17%
94K → 39K
—
—
$2.15B
United States
Financial Services
33
-58.00%
20.5M → 8.6M
—
—
$30.76B
United States
Industrials
34
-57.80%
8.8M → 3.7M
—
—
$11.53M
Singapore
Communication Services
35
-57.33%
549K → 234K
—
—
$91.91M
China
Consumer Cyclical
36
-56.74%
1.9M → 821K
—
—
$39.95M
United States
Healthcare
37
-56.34%
1.1M → 480K
—
—
$2.69B
Argentina
Financial Services
38
-56.30%
1.9M → 836K
—
—
$5.62B
Canada
Real Estate
39
-55.17%
90K → 40K
—
—
$658.54M
United States
Financial Services
40
-55.05%
173K → 78K
—
—
$32.83B
Brazil
Financial Services
41
-54.96%
266K → 120K
—
—
$710.50M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
42
-53.81%
60K → 28K
—
—
$465.08M
United States
Financial Services
43
-53.63%
9.0M → 4.2M
—
—
$1.46B
Brazil
Basic Materials
44
-53.29%
866K → 405K
—
—
$24.98M
China
Real Estate
45
-52.88%
37.0M → 17.4M
—
—
$104.18B
Canada
Energy
46
-52.86%
1.2M → 543K
—
—
$14.36M
Australia
Consumer Defensive
47
-52.65%
3.9M → 1.9M
—
—
$6.72B
Canada
Technology
48
-51.93%
106K → 51K
—
—
$991.82M
United States
Financial Services
49
-51.87%
5.3M → 2.5M
—
—
$279.63B
Canada
Financial Services
50
-50.93%
67K → 33K
—
—
$34.29M
United States
Industrials
51
-50.76%
77K → 38K
—
—
$72.14M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
52
-50.39%
15.6M → 7.7M
—
—
$72.77B
Canada
Financial Services
53
-50.25%
294K → 146K
—
—
$86.44M
United States
Energy
54
-50.07%
753K → 376K
—
—
$17.42M
United States
Technology
55
-49.99%
1.4M → 699K
—
—
$14.19M
Canada
Utilities
56
-49.69%
243K → 122K
—
—
$1.06B
United States
Financial Services
57
-49.45%
292K → 148K
—
—
$18.37M
United States
Technology
58
-49.21%
892K → 453K
—
—
$617.62M
United States
Financial Services
59
-48.85%
1.1M → 562K
—
—
$2.36B
United States
Financial Services
60
-48.77%
1.4M → 701K
—
—
$10.17M
United States
Healthcare
61
-48.38%
213K → 110K
—
—
$11.75M
United States
Industrials
62
-48.30%
10.1M → 5.2M
—
—
$9.00B
United States
Basic Materials
63
-48.19%
679K → 352K
—
—
$46.19M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
64
-47.65%
95K → 50K
—
—
$242.95M
United States
Financial Services
65
-45.88%
2.9M → 1.5M
—
—
$56.62M
United States
Communication Services
66
-45.44%
612K → 334K
—
—
$130.91M
United Kingdom
Industrials
67
-45.41%
810K → 442K
—
—
$23.71M
Hong Kong
Technology
68
-45.10%
73K → 40K
—
—
$95.59M
United States
Financial Services
69
-44.39%
303K → 168K
—
—
$23.13M
United Kingdom
Real Estate
70
-44.31%
2.3M → 1.3M
—
—
$525.24M
China
Communication Services
71
-43.82%
876K → 492K
—
—
$15.34B
—
—
72
-43.14%
63K → 36K
—
—
$33.55M
United States
Technology
73
-42.56%
72K → 41K
—
—
$19.49M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
74
-42.17%
167K → 97K
—
—
$12.53M
United States
Healthcare
75
-42.15%
1.0M → 600K
—
—
$11.11M
Australia
Consumer Cyclical
76
-42.11%
44K → 25K
—
—
$101.91M
China
Consumer Cyclical
77
-41.94%
6.2M → 3.6M
—
—
$316.69M
United States
Healthcare
78
-41.56%
67K → 39K
—
—
$11.00M
United States
Technology
79
-41.55%
27.9M → 16.3M
—
—
$70.58B
Canada
Basic Materials
80
-40.67%
9.3M → 5.5M
—
—
$67.74M
United States
Healthcare
81
-40.66%
93K → 55K
—
—
$1.50B
United States
Financial Services
82
-40.36%
324K → 193K
—
—
$562.11M
United Kingdom
Financial Services
83
-40.09%
146K → 87K
—
—
$105.76M
United States
Healthcare
84
-39.56%
686K → 415K
—
—
$812.45M
United States
Financial Services
85
-38.70%
85K → 52K
—
—
$135.08M
China
Industrials
86
-37.34%
6.1M → 3.9M
—
—
$50.09B
United States
Basic Materials
87
-37.33%
50K → 32K
—
—
$13.52M
Canada
Consumer Cyclical
88
-36.96%
70K → 44K
—
—
$61.57M
United States
Financial Services
89
-36.94%
83K → 52K
—
—
$55.50M
United States
Industrials
90
-36.73%
213K → 135K
—
—
$85.56M
China
Industrials
91
-36.40%
98K → 62K
—
—
$20.95M
United States
Healthcare
92
-36.40%
6.2M → 3.9M
—
—
$44.43B
Canada
Financial Services
93
-36.01%
49K → 31K
—
—
$12.41M
United States
Healthcare
94
-35.77%
58K → 37K
—
—
$10.65M
United States
Healthcare
95
-35.71%
5.3M → 3.4M
—
—
$5.89B
Brazil
Utilities
96
-35.56%
726K → 468K
—
—
$210.73M
United States
Financial Services
97
-35.51%
161K → 104K
—
—
$139.53M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
98
-35.31%
358K → 232K
—
—
$10.80M
United States
Healthcare
99
-35.24%
145K → 94K
—
—
$234.17M
United States
Communication Services
100
-35.03%
92K → 60K
—
—
$90.83M
Singapore
Industrials
Looking for a specific Symbol?
* Measured against the tradable float where one is published, and against shares outstanding where none is. Rows on the wider denominator say "of outstanding", because the same position reads lower against it.
Short interest data is provided by FINRA and updated bi-monthly. Data as of September 2026. A settlement records positions open on that date rather than trading in between. This ranking is informational and is not investment advice.

What declining short interest means

A smaller reported short position means shares that were borrowed and sold have been bought back, or that the share base underneath the count changed. The first reading is short covering, which itself adds buying pressure; the second is arithmetic, and a reverse split or a symbol leaving the settlement file can produce a fall nobody traded.

The rows here are the ones whose position fell fastest between the two most recent FINRA settlement files. Check the share counts beside each percentage and whether the row is marked as split-affected before reading a decrease as covering, and remember that covering says nothing about whether the short was closing at a profit or a loss.

companies with decreasing short interest

Short Squeeze Potential:

  • Squeeze Mechanics: When shorts cover rapidly, their buying adds upward pressure to the stock. If this coincides with positive news or strong demand, prices can spike dramatically as remaining shorts are forced to cover at increasingly higher prices.
  • Volume Confirmation: Declining short interest accompanied by above-average volume is a stronger signal than quiet short covering. Volume confirms active participation rather than gradual position unwinding.
  • Price Action Context: If short interest is declining while the stock price is rising, it confirms a bullish trend. If short interest drops while price is flat, shorts may simply be taking profits rather than signaling a trend change.
  • Catalyst-Driven Covering: Earnings beats, FDA approvals, partnership announcements, or analyst upgrades can trigger rapid short covering cascades, especially in stocks with high short interest ratios.

How to Use This Data:

Stocks on this page show the largest percentage decreases in short interest between FINRA reporting periods. Consider these approaches:

  • Look for stocks where declining short interest confirms a price uptrend — this suggests bears are capitulating
  • Watch for high-short-interest stocks where covering has just begun — the remaining shorts may be forced out next
  • Correlate short covering with fundamental improvements such as revenue growth, margin expansion, or new contracts
  • Be cautious of stocks where short interest declines after a sharp price drop — shorts may be taking profits, not signaling a bottom

Important Considerations:

Declining short interest does not guarantee price appreciation. Shorts may cover for many reasons including risk management, portfolio rebalancing, or reaching profit targets on positions that already worked. The most actionable signals come when declining short interest aligns with improving fundamentals and positive technical patterns. Always conduct thorough research before making investment decisions based on short interest data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q Which stocks had the biggest short interest decrease this period?
A

MUA leads this ranking, followed by EPOW and AVAT. The ranking measures the change in reported short positions between two consecutive FINRA settlement files, so it reflects positions that were open on those two dates rather than trading that happened in between. The figures on this page come from the settlement dated Sep 15, 2026.

Q How often is short interest data updated?
A

FINRA collects short positions twice a month, on the settlement dates around mid-month and month-end, and publishes each file about seven business days later, on dates it announces a year ahead. That gap is why this page states its settlement date and the age of the figures: a position can have changed substantially before the next file confirms it.

Q What do short interest as a percentage of float and days to cover actually mean?
A

Short interest as a percentage of float is the shorted position measured against the shares actually available to trade, so it answers how crowded the short side is. Days to cover divides that position by average daily volume, answering how long ordinary trading would take to buy it back. Where no reliable float exists, the percentage is measured against shares outstanding instead and the row says so, because the same position reads lower on the wider denominator.

Q What does a large drop in short interest actually tell you?
A

Less than it appears. A fall in the reported position is consistent with shorts buying back, which is the reading most people reach for, but it is equally consistent with a share count that changed underneath the figure: a reverse split rebases the position without anyone trading, and a symbol leaving the settlement file entirely can read as a collapse to zero. Even genuine covering says nothing about why, since a short may be closing at a profit, at a loss, or simply rebalancing. Check the raw share counts beside the percentage and whether a corporate action landed between the two settlement dates before treating a decrease as a signal.

Q How do traders screen for short squeeze candidates?
A

A squeeze needs three things together, and no single column identifies one. First, a crowded position: a high percentage of float, not merely a large share count. Second, difficulty exiting: a high days-to-cover figure, meaning ordinary volume cannot absorb the buying that covering requires. Third, a catalyst that forces the timing, such as an earnings surprise, a regulatory decision or a financing announcement. Screening on any one of the three in isolation produces mostly false positives. Rows marked as split-affected belong in none of it: a split between the two settlement dates rebases the share count, so their change reflects arithmetic rather than anyone trading, and they are marked precisely so they can be set aside.

Q Does high short interest mean a stock will fall?
A

No. Short interest records positioning, not outcomes. Institutions short for hedging as well as for directional bets, so a large position may be one leg of a trade rather than a view on the company. Heavily shorted stocks have both fallen and risen sharply; the data tells you who is positioned how, and nothing about who is right.