STOCK TITAN

Short Interest Increases — Rising Bearish Positions

US-listed companies whose reported short position grew the most between the two most recent FINRA settlement files. A larger position records positioning rather than an outcome; the share counts beside each percentage are what make it readable.
Settlement Aug 31, 2026
next publication (FINRA schedule) Sep 24, 2026
data 25 days old
Reporting period August 2026
Direction Rising short interest
Page 20 of 28

Swipe the table sideways for more columns.

What these columns measure
Short Interest Change
How far the reported short position moved between the two most recent FINRA settlement files. The share counts under each percentage are the two positions it was computed from. A position that grew from almost nothing has no meaningful percentage, so those rows report a floor of over 999.99% instead, and only when the current position is at least 275,000 shares.
Split in period
A share split that took effect between the two settlement dates puts the two counts on different share bases, so the percentage measures the rebase rather than any trading. Those rows are struck through and marked, never adjusted, because a heuristic correction here is a number nobody can verify.
SI % of Float*
Shares sold short measured against the shares actually available to trade. Where no reliable float exists the position is measured against shares outstanding instead and the row says "of outstanding", because the same position reads lower on the wider denominator.
Days to Cover
Shares sold short divided by average daily volume: how many days of ordinary trading buying the position back would take. FINRA floors the value at 1.00 whenever average daily volume already exceeds the position, so those rows read "1 day or less" rather than stating a precision the source withheld.
Why a cell shows a dash
A percentage is withheld rather than guessed whenever its denominator cannot be trusted: the security class publishes no float, the share-count sources disagree, a split leaves the basis uncertain, the settlement file reports no position, or the computed percentage failed the reliability check. The raw share counts stay visible in every one of those cases.
Rank
Symbol
Company Name
Short Interest Change
SI % of Float*
Days to Cover
Market Cap
Country
Sector
1901
+4.81%
11.3M → 11.9M
2.23%
4.0
$61.80B
United States
Financial Services
1902
+4.79%
5.1M → 5.3M
18.46%
2.8
$300.56M
United States
Technology
1903
+4.79%
92K → 97K
6.56%
4.9
$181.70M
United States
Energy
1904
+4.78%
2.9M → 3.1M
29.94%
2.1
$13.68M
United States
Industrials
1905
+4.78%
12.1M → 12.7M
8.46%
4.6
$493.94M
United States
Technology
1906
+4.77%
6.8M → 7.1M
9.14%
6.7
$1.03B
Switzerland
Healthcare
1907
+4.77%
2.7M → 2.8M
14.57%
11.5
$1.21B
United States
Consumer Defensive
1908
+4.76%
1.2M → 1.3M
2.04%of outstanding
3.9
$59.84B
Netherlands
Healthcare
1909
+4.76%
1.7M → 1.8M
7.52%
5.5
$31.62M
United States
Financial Services
1910
+4.76%
943K → 988K
9.19%
6.5
$3.14B
United States
Basic Materials
1911
+4.73%
18.4M → 19.2M
3.88%
3.6
$10.41B
Cayman Islands
Financial Services
1912
+4.72%
2.2M → 2.3M
4.58%
7.9
$896.38M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1913
+4.72%
3.6M → 3.8M
7.87%
10.6
$613.25M
United States
Real Estate
1914
+4.72%
3.1M → 3.3M
6.08%
13.8
$2.68B
United States
Financial Services
1915
+4.72%
3.7M → 3.9M
3.40%
3.4
$21.85B
United States
Financial Services
1916
+4.71%
7.0M → 7.3M
9.92%
8.2
$194.54M
United States
Basic Materials
1917
+4.71%
3.5M → 3.6M
6.21%
5.9
$5.21B
United States
Healthcare
1918
+4.71%
5.8M → 6.1M
3.33%
5.9
$13.63B
United States
Real Estate
1919
+4.71%
24.8M → 25.9M
30.64%
6.2
$2.40B
United States
Financial Services
1920
+4.69%
75K → 79K
0.33%
1 day or less
$398.14M
United States
Financial Services
1921
+4.68%
63.5M → 66.5M
10.42%
2.1
$287.71M
Singapore
Technology
1922
+4.68%
1.3M → 1.4M
13.22%
8.3
$414.72M
United States
Technology
1923
+4.67%
550K → 576K
14.54%
7.1
$451.37M
United States
Communication Services
1924
+4.66%
13.4M → 14.0M
1.58%of outstanding
1.7
$46.01B
Netherlands
Technology
1925
+4.65%
2.8M → 2.9M
10.40%
14.4
$863.31M
United States
Financial Services
1926
+4.63%
10.3M → 10.8M
18.09%
18.4
$2.09B
United States
Healthcare
1927
+4.63%
3.0M → 3.2M
11.00%
26.0
$1.13B
United States
Healthcare
1928
+4.62%
3.2M → 3.3M
2.15%
4.5
$8.85B
China
Consumer Defensive
1929
+4.62%
2.9M → 3.0M
5.67%
5.1
$2.69B
United States
Basic Materials
1930
+4.62%
6.2M → 6.5M
6.59%
6.4
$4.65B
United States
Energy
1931
+4.61%
8.4M → 8.8M
4.58%
7.0
$11.94B
United States
Real Estate
1932
+4.61%
860K → 899K
1.77%
5.5
$843.05M
Turkey
Consumer Cyclical
1933
+4.61%
2.2M → 2.3M
8.99%
7.3
$601.20M
United States
Technology
1934
+4.61%
18.1M → 18.9M
5.50%
8.2
$32.48B
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1935
+4.59%
3.8M → 4.0M
4.85%
5.3
$2.35B
United States
Financial Services
1936
+4.59%
1.7M → 1.8M
5.10%
8.3
$1.40B
United States
Financial Services
1937
+4.58%
6.0M → 6.3M
6.33%
7.9
$5.01B
United States
Technology
1938
+4.58%
1.6M → 1.7M
2.68%
4.7
$7.84B
United States
Healthcare
1939
+4.58%
2.8M → 3.0M
12.96%
7.9
$683.62M
United States
Consumer Defensive
1940
+4.57%
22.1M → 23.2M
16.12%
5.3
$1.42B
United States
Industrials
1941
+4.57%
2.1M → 2.2M
12.95%
3.7
$144.09M
United States
Healthcare
1942
+4.57%
3.8M → 4.0M
4.35%
6.1
$1.77B
United States
Real Estate
1943
+4.55%
10.8M → 11.3M
6.14%
5.8
$7.68B
United States
Industrials
1944
+4.55%
3.0M → 3.1M
8.70%
11.3
$1.83B
United States
Industrials
1945
+4.54%
2.2M → 2.3M
5.53%
5.9
$3.01B
Bermuda
Financial Services
1946
+4.54%
742K → 776K
2.77%
4.3
$290.13M
United States
Industrials
1947
+4.54%
504K → 526K
0.24%
9.3
$285.97M
China
Consumer Cyclical
1948
+4.53%
8.8M → 9.2M
16.56%
9.4
$314.15M
United States
Industrials
1949
+4.51%
3.5M → 3.6M
4.66%
5.5
$36.15B
United States
Industrials
1950
+4.49%
6.7M → 7.0M
23.82%
5.7
$437.07M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1951
+4.47%
5.9M → 6.2M
6.11%
4.6
$214.38M
United States
Healthcare
1952
+4.46%
3.2M → 3.3M
12.94%
15.3
$10.21B
United States
Healthcare
1953
+4.46%
28.2M → 29.4M
21.51%
11.9
$976.15M
United States
Technology
1954
+4.45%
6.1M → 6.4M
5.10%
13.1
$349.82M
United States
Communication Services
1955
+4.45%
3.7M → 3.8M
6.23%
1 day or less
$51.00M
Israel
Technology
1956
+4.44%
1.9M → 2.0M
5.61%
10.3
$1.72B
United States
Financial Services
1957
+4.42%
2.3M → 2.4M
4.54%
8.1
$230.25M
United States
Real Estate
1958
+4.42%
24.6M → 25.7M
11.99%
8.2
$7.10B
United States
Technology
1959
+4.42%
711K → 743K
4.04%
4.8
$563.91M
United States
Industrials
1960
+4.42%
1.2M → 1.2M
6.00%
6.5
$645.14M
United States
Industrials
1961
+4.39%
12.7M → 13.3M
6.66%
8.9
$6.68B
China
Technology
1962
+4.39%
14.9M → 15.5M
6.17%
4.6
$5.82B
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1963
+4.38%
8.7M → 9.1M
16.04%
13.8
$1.05B
United States
Healthcare
1964
+4.38%
8.2M → 8.5M
20.04%
12.3
$5.59B
United States
Healthcare
1965
+4.38%
1.5M → 1.6M
8.35%of outstanding
12.3
$11.88B
United States
Industrials
1966
+4.37%
214K → 223K
0.37%of outstanding
3.8
$9.21B
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1967
+4.36%
16.6M → 17.4M
14.08%
11.3
$98.96M
Canada
Healthcare
1968
+4.35%
2.0M → 2.1M
2.93%
4.1
$6.91B
Bermuda
Financial Services
1969
+4.35%
313K → 326K
30.89%
2.9
$31.88M
United States
Financial Services
1970
+4.34%
6.0M → 6.2M
14.51%
12.7
$4.01B
United States
Technology
1971
+4.34%
3.7M → 3.8M
1.54%
4.0
$39.23B
Canada
Industrials
1972
+4.33%
6.0M → 6.3M
5.55%
7.7
$20.62B
United States
Industrials
1973
+4.32%
23.3M → 24.3M
4.50%
7.2
$64.00B
United States
Utilities
1974
+4.32%
163K → 170K
2.20%
4.5
$267.93M
United States
Financial Services
1975
+4.32%
3.1M → 3.2M
6.25%
7.3
$2.76B
United States
Industrials
1976
+4.32%
4.3M → 4.5M
5.30%
2.2
$7.74B
United States
Technology
1977
+4.32%
286.0M → 298.3M
1.29%
2.1
$5.42T
United States
Technology
1978
+4.31%
131K → 136K
1.59%
3.6
$750.01M
United States
Real Estate
1979
+4.31%
244K → 254K
2.77%
3.0
$677.98M
United States
Consumer Defensive
1980
+4.30%
7.4M → 7.7M
14.98%
10.4
$1.09B
United States
Healthcare
1981
+4.30%
37.0M → 38.6M
3.37%
5.3
$20.01B
United States
Healthcare
1982
+4.29%
9.5M → 9.9M
7.61%
4.3
$6.77B
United States
Industrials
1983
+4.29%
1.0M → 1.1M
3.66%
5.6
$943.74M
United States
Financial Services
1984
+4.29%
343K → 358K
12.02%
9.9
$1.05B
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1985
+4.28%
6.9M → 7.2M
12.01%
7.3
$1.52B
United States
Industrials
1986
+4.27%
3.9M → 4.0M
1.85%
3.8
$63.35B
United States
Basic Materials
1987
+4.27%
15.6M → 16.3M
8.14%
4.5
$1.62B
Bermuda
Energy
1988
+4.26%
4.2M → 4.3M
23.12%
9.2
$3.70B
United States
Financial Services
1989
+4.26%
180K → 188K
4.11%
11.2
$127.42M
United States
Basic Materials
1990
+4.25%
10.8M → 11.3M
10.19%
4.6
$4.47B
United States
Industrials
1991
+4.25%
1.9M → 1.9M
10.79%
8.8
$3.71B
United States
Consumer Defensive
1992
+4.24%
129K → 134K
1.33%
16.3
$420.00M
United States
Financial Services
1993
+4.22%
1.6M → 1.7M
21.72%
11.3
$265.68M
United States
Healthcare
1994
+4.22%
10.9M → 11.4M
12.44%
11.7
$872.19M
United States
Financial Services
1995
+4.22%
877K → 914K
35.10%
9.3
$31.80M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1996
+4.21%
6.9M → 7.2M
18.45%
14.8
$140.26M
United States
Healthcare
1997
+4.21%
4.2M → 4.3M
7.78%
9.6
$265.96M
United States
Communication Services
1998
+4.20%
50.8M → 52.9M
28.01%of outstanding
7.3
$2.26B
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1999
+4.19%
9.6M → 10.1M
6.33%
2.6
$8.90B
United States
Basic Materials
2000
+4.19%
7.4M → 7.7M
8.48%
7.8
$174.02M
United States
Financial Services
Looking for a specific Symbol?
A position that grew from almost nothing has no meaningful percentage, so rows marked this way report >999.99% as a floor rather than a measurement, and only when the current position is at least 275,000 shares. Read the share counts beside them instead. Rows whose position stayed under that size show no percentage at all.
* Measured against the tradable float where one is published, and against shares outstanding where none is. Rows on the wider denominator say "of outstanding", because the same position reads lower against it.
Short interest data is provided by FINRA and updated bi-monthly. Data as of August 2026. A settlement records positions open on that date rather than trading in between. This ranking is informational and is not investment advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q Which stocks had the biggest short interest increase this period?
A

MET leads this ranking, followed by DUOT and PED. The ranking measures the change in reported short positions between two consecutive FINRA settlement files, so it reflects positions that were open on those two dates rather than trading that happened in between. The figures on this page come from the settlement dated Aug 31, 2026.

Q How often is short interest data updated?
A

FINRA collects short positions twice a month, on the settlement dates around mid-month and month-end, and publishes each file about seven business days later, on dates it announces a year ahead. That gap is why this page states its settlement date and the age of the figures: a position can have changed substantially before the next file confirms it.

Q What do short interest as a percentage of float and days to cover actually mean?
A

Short interest as a percentage of float is the shorted position measured against the shares actually available to trade, so it answers how crowded the short side is. Days to cover divides that position by average daily volume, answering how long ordinary trading would take to buy it back. Where no reliable float exists, the percentage is measured against shares outstanding instead and the row says so, because the same position reads lower on the wider denominator.

Q Why do some rows show no percentage change?
A

A position that grew from almost nothing has no meaningful percentage: dividing by a near-zero previous position produces a number that says more about the denominator than about the position. Rows in that state report a floor of over 999.99% instead, and only when the current position is at least 275,000 shares. Below that size the page shows no percentage at all and leaves the raw share counts, which are the reliable figures.

Q How do traders screen for short squeeze candidates?
A

A squeeze needs three things together, and no single column identifies one. First, a crowded position: a high percentage of float, not merely a large share count. Second, difficulty exiting: a high days-to-cover figure, meaning ordinary volume cannot absorb the buying that covering requires. Third, a catalyst that forces the timing, such as an earnings surprise, a regulatory decision or a financing announcement. Screening on any one of the three in isolation produces mostly false positives. Rows marked as split-affected belong in none of it: a split between the two settlement dates rebases the share count, so their change reflects arithmetic rather than anyone trading, and they are marked precisely so they can be set aside.

Q Does high short interest mean a stock will fall?
A

No. Short interest records positioning, not outcomes. Institutions short for hedging as well as for directional bets, so a large position may be one leg of a trade rather than a view on the company. Heavily shorted stocks have both fallen and risen sharply; the data tells you who is positioned how, and nothing about who is right.