STOCK TITAN

Short Interest Increases — Rising Bearish Positions

US-listed companies whose reported short position grew the most between the two most recent FINRA settlement files. A larger position records positioning rather than an outcome; the share counts beside each percentage are what make it readable.
Settlement Sep 15, 2026
next publication (FINRA schedule) Oct 9, 2026
data 15 days old
Reporting period September 2026
Direction Rising short interest
Page 20 of 29

Swipe the table sideways for more columns.

What these columns measure
Short Interest Change
How far the reported short position moved between the two most recent FINRA settlement files. The share counts under each percentage are the two positions it was computed from. A position that grew from almost nothing has no meaningful percentage, so those rows report a floor of over 999.99% instead, and only when the current position is at least 275,000 shares.
Split in period
A share split that took effect between the two settlement dates puts the two counts on different share bases, so the percentage measures the rebase rather than any trading. Those rows are struck through and marked, never adjusted, because a heuristic correction here is a number nobody can verify.
SI % of Float*
Shares sold short measured against the shares actually available to trade. Where no reliable float exists the position is measured against shares outstanding instead and the row says "of outstanding", because the same position reads lower on the wider denominator.
Days to Cover
Shares sold short divided by average daily volume: how many days of ordinary trading buying the position back would take. FINRA floors the value at 1.00 whenever average daily volume already exceeds the position, so those rows read "1 day or less" rather than stating a precision the source withheld.
Why a cell shows a dash
A percentage is withheld rather than guessed whenever its denominator cannot be trusted: the security class publishes no float, the share-count sources disagree, a split leaves the basis uncertain, the settlement file reports no position, or the computed percentage failed the reliability check. The raw share counts stay visible in every one of those cases.
Rank
Symbol
Company Name
Short Interest Change
SI % of Float*
Days to Cover
Market Cap
Country
Sector
1901
+4.73%
281K → 294K
3.55%
10.6
$266.24M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1902
+4.73%
39.3M → 41.1M
6.09%
5.6
$15.59B
United States
Real Estate
1903
+4.73%
3.2M → 3.3M
7.01%
5.2
$627.28M
United States
Communication Services
1904
+4.73%
3.9M → 4.1M
9.88%of outstanding
5.4
$6.30B
United States
Communication Services
1905
+4.71%
3.2M → 3.3M
6.09%
19.4
$1.93B
Australia
Healthcare
1906
+4.70%
1.2M → 1.3M
8.28%
15.2
$312.91M
United States
Real Estate
1907
+4.69%
1.7M → 1.8M
4.59%
3.8
$11.35B
United States
Industrials
1908
+4.69%
26.5M → 27.7M
9.73%
7.4
$4.17B
United States
Real Estate
1909
+4.69%
562K → 588K
2.90%
8.4
$425.06M
United States
Utilities
1910
+4.69%
17.7M → 18.5M
18.01%
12.1
$2.58B
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1911
+4.68%
521K → 545K
1.93%
2.1
$378.73M
United States
Healthcare
1912
+4.67%
24.2M → 25.4M
26.41%of outstanding
5.0
$1.04B
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1913
+4.67%
3.4M → 3.5M
13.17%
12.7
$1.41B
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1914
+4.66%
3.2M → 3.4M
5.07%
2.7
$10.38B
United States
Industrials
1915
+4.66%
30.7M → 32.1M
39.05%
11.4
$401.46M
United States
Industrials
1916
+4.65%
226.6M → 237.1M
43.96%
3.9
$4.36B
United States
Technology
1917
+4.64%
6.5M → 6.8M
9.71%of outstanding
3.4
$51.55M
Israel
Healthcare
1918
+4.64%
990K → 1.0M
3.07%
5.3
$1.23B
Israel
Technology
1919
+4.63%
39.5M → 41.3M
8.02%
6.4
$47.06B
United States
Healthcare
1920
+4.63%
41.4M → 43.3M
23.24%
36.3
$1.04B
United States
Healthcare
1921
+4.63%
9.4M → 9.9M
31.79%
5.7
$1.51B
United States
Healthcare
1922
+4.62%
790K → 826K
3.63%
13.1
$990.07M
United States
Financial Services
1923
+4.62%
3.1M → 3.3M
17.62%
16.9
$568.12M
United States
Healthcare
1924
+4.62%
26.2M → 27.4M
13.11%
20.4
$22.29B
United States
Financial Services
1925
+4.61%
18.5M → 19.4M
20.81%
10.3
$499.68M
United States
Consumer Defensive
1926
+4.61%
11.3M → 11.8M
8.97%
7.7
$1.69B
United States
Real Estate
1927
+4.60%
1.5M → 1.6M
10.62%
11.9
$140.78M
United States
Healthcare
1928
+4.60%
15.0M → 15.7M
10.84%
14.7
$1.58B
China
Communication Services
1929
+4.59%
3.8M → 4.0M
3.96%
5.7
$147.83M
United States
Healthcare
1930
+4.59%
6.3M → 6.6M
2.52%
4.6
$72.73B
United States
Healthcare
1931
+4.59%
2.9M → 3.1M
8.51%
6.7
$140.20M
United States
Energy
1932
+4.59%
16.8M → 17.6M
15.70%
11.4
$25.13B
United States
Industrials
1933
+4.59%
119K → 124K
1.16%
1.1
$105.50M
Canada
Financial Services
1934
+4.57%
196K → 205K
0.85%
5.4
$39.14M
Canada
Consumer Cyclical
1935
+4.57%
4.6M → 4.8M
10.27%
9.4
$2.21B
United States
Healthcare
1936
+4.55%
32.1M → 33.6M
23.46%
7.1
$8.09B
United States
Basic Materials
1937
+4.55%
1.6M → 1.6M
6.77%
6.4
$367.97M
Italy
Utilities
1938
+4.55%
345K → 361K
22.03%
1.6
$16.24M
United States
Healthcare
1939
+4.55%
10.9M → 11.4M
8.68%
7.0
$9.52B
United States
Technology
1940
+4.54%
7.3M → 7.6M
10.37%
6.3
$178.58M
United States
Basic Materials
1941
+4.53%
3.6M → 3.7M
4.27%
17.1
$158.44M
United States
Healthcare
1942
+4.53%
4.2M → 4.4M
5.53%
8.2
$2.13B
United States
Industrials
1943
+4.53%
4.7M → 4.9M
7.50%
8.0
$1.95B
United States
Healthcare
1944
+4.52%
928K → 970K
1.49%
3.1
$16.52B
United States
Financial Services
1945
+4.51%
674K → 705K
6.41%
7.3
$573.77M
United States
Industrials
1946
+4.50%
162K → 169K
6.28%
4.2
$30.13M
United States
Financial Services
1947
+4.50%
2.4M → 2.5M
5.28%
6.6
$1.78B
Monaco
Industrials
1948
+4.50%
3.4M → 3.6M
3.28%
3.7
$25.60B
United States
Healthcare
1949
+4.50%
32.2M → 33.6M
21.38%
3.2
$6.90B
United States
Utilities
1950
+4.49%
519K → 542K
9.41%
9.3
$74.71M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1951
+4.49%
428K → 447K
1.50%of outstanding
3.6
$313.76M
United States
Financial Services
1952
+4.49%
5.7M → 6.0M
5.42%
5.6
$1.15B
United States
Real Estate
1953
+4.49%
4.1M → 4.3M
1.92%
4.2
$53.60B
United States
Basic Materials
1954
+4.48%
1.7M → 1.8M
3.49%
4.1
$6.01B
United States
Industrials
1955
+4.48%
2.3M → 2.4M
7.83%
6.3
$3.65B
United States
Energy
1956
+4.47%
9.1M → 9.5M
7.63%
6.2
$16.22B
United States
Technology
1957
+4.46%
17.4M → 18.2M
5.65%
4.8
$36.56B
United States
Industrials
1958
+4.44%
30.8M → 32.2M
3.57%
7.0
$46.22B
United States
Financial Services
1959
+4.44%
2.0M → 2.1M
3.96%
7.0
$13.25B
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1960
+4.44%
7.2M → 7.5M
2.66%
2.8
$11.13B
United States
Utilities
1961
+4.43%
1.1M → 1.2M
3.01%
3.3
$10.23B
United States
Industrials
1962
+4.43%
5.1M → 5.4M
19.05%
11.4
$197.78M
United States
Financial Services
1963
+4.42%
8.0M → 8.3M
13.54%
7.6
$11.74B
United States
Technology
1964
+4.41%
10.4M → 10.8M
14.27%
12.8
$5.36B
United States
Utilities
1965
+4.41%
5.2M → 5.4M
0.16%
4.0
$344.60B
United Kingdom
Financial Services
1966
+4.41%
16.4M → 17.1M
18.13%
19.6
$767.73M
United States
Healthcare
1967
+4.41%
440K → 459K
6.28%
4.2
$32.33M
United States
Financial Services
1968
+4.40%
12.1M → 12.6M
3.31%
3.4
$15.05B
United States
Financial Services
1969
+4.39%
2.3M → 2.4M
7.78%
6.9
$432.64M
United States
Healthcare
1970
+4.39%
6.9M → 7.2M
11.25%of outstanding
7.2
$805.39M
United States
Healthcare
1971
+4.39%
5.7M → 5.9M
5.50%
3.8
$14.93B
United States
Technology
1972
+4.38%
11.9M → 12.4M
15.62%
11.4
$6.33B
United States
Healthcare
1973
+4.38%
16.8M → 17.5M
8.96%
7.7
$1.42B
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1974
+4.38%
7.5M → 7.8M
7.09%
9.9
$1.79B
United States
Energy
1975
+4.37%
7.3M → 7.6M
4.46%
4.0
$5.26B
United States
Energy
1976
+4.37%
364K → 380K
3.05%
8.7
$15.10M
Sweden
Technology
1977
+4.37%
1.8M → 1.9M
6.48%
4.9
$642.46M
United States
Technology
1978
+4.37%
5.9M → 6.2M
3.65%
7.3
$53.36B
United States
Real Estate
1979
+4.37%
2.2M → 2.3M
9.11%
2.4
$148.53M
United States
Communication Services
1980
+4.36%
12.8M → 13.4M
2.51%
3.6
$44.49B
United States
Technology
1981
+4.35%
12.4M → 12.9M
24.62%
13.2
$835.56M
United States
Healthcare
1982
+4.33%
419K → 437K
2.25%
2.5
$351.97M
United States
Energy
1983
+4.32%
643K → 671K
0.82%
1.4
$68.15M
United States
Healthcare
1984
+4.31%
2.2M → 2.3M
7.30%
6.3
$1.09B
United States
Industrials
1985
+4.31%
551K → 575K
5.41%
3.7
$2.20B
United States
Financial Services
1986
+4.31%
152.2M → 158.8M
3.49%
1.8
$612.82B
United States
Technology
1987
+4.30%
318K → 332K
5.06%
2.4
$185.32M
United States
Healthcare
1988
+4.30%
75.7M → 79.0M
6.09%
8.9
$42.23B
United States
Consumer Defensive
1989
+4.30%
1.7M → 1.8M
4.72%
7.2
$12.56B
United States
Healthcare
1990
+4.29%
524K → 547K
5.04%
4.8
$2.26B
United States
Technology
1991
+4.29%
894K → 932K
10.85%
12.0
$488.05M
United States
Healthcare
1992
+4.27%
1.3M → 1.3M
2.12%of outstanding
6.3
$60.36B
Netherlands
Healthcare
1993
+4.27%
9.1M → 9.5M
16.73%
3.5
$1.06B
United States
Healthcare
1994
+4.26%
449K → 468K
5.90%
7.5
$23.42B
United States
Financial Services
1995
+4.26%
5.3M → 5.5M
18.24%
9.0
$1.93B
United States
Communication Services
1996
+4.25%
31.7M → 33.0M
13.06%of outstanding
15.5
$1.99B
United States
Financial Services
1997
+4.25%
1.2M → 1.2M
6.35%
7.4
$749.47M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
1998
+4.23%
184K → 191K
2.21%
4.3
$303.52M
United States
Financial Services
1999
+4.23%
292K → 304K
1.01%
1.7
$6.02B
Peru
Financial Services
2000
+4.22%
6.2M → 6.4M
12.79%
3.4
$611.07M
United States
Consumer Cyclical
Looking for a specific Symbol?
A position that grew from almost nothing has no meaningful percentage, so rows marked this way report >999.99% as a floor rather than a measurement, and only when the current position is at least 275,000 shares. Read the share counts beside them instead. Rows whose position stayed under that size show no percentage at all.
* Measured against the tradable float where one is published, and against shares outstanding where none is. Rows on the wider denominator say "of outstanding", because the same position reads lower against it.
Short interest data is provided by FINRA and updated bi-monthly. Data as of September 2026. A settlement records positions open on that date rather than trading in between. This ranking is informational and is not investment advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q Which stocks had the biggest short interest increase this period?
A

ESCA leads this ranking, followed by HST and SHEN. The ranking measures the change in reported short positions between two consecutive FINRA settlement files, so it reflects positions that were open on those two dates rather than trading that happened in between. The figures on this page come from the settlement dated Sep 15, 2026.

Q How often is short interest data updated?
A

FINRA collects short positions twice a month, on the settlement dates around mid-month and month-end, and publishes each file about seven business days later, on dates it announces a year ahead. That gap is why this page states its settlement date and the age of the figures: a position can have changed substantially before the next file confirms it.

Q What do short interest as a percentage of float and days to cover actually mean?
A

Short interest as a percentage of float is the shorted position measured against the shares actually available to trade, so it answers how crowded the short side is. Days to cover divides that position by average daily volume, answering how long ordinary trading would take to buy it back. Where no reliable float exists, the percentage is measured against shares outstanding instead and the row says so, because the same position reads lower on the wider denominator.

Q Why do some rows show no percentage change?
A

A position that grew from almost nothing has no meaningful percentage: dividing by a near-zero previous position produces a number that says more about the denominator than about the position. Rows in that state report a floor of over 999.99% instead, and only when the current position is at least 275,000 shares. Below that size the page shows no percentage at all and leaves the raw share counts, which are the reliable figures.

Q How do traders screen for short squeeze candidates?
A

A squeeze needs three things together, and no single column identifies one. First, a crowded position: a high percentage of float, not merely a large share count. Second, difficulty exiting: a high days-to-cover figure, meaning ordinary volume cannot absorb the buying that covering requires. Third, a catalyst that forces the timing, such as an earnings surprise, a regulatory decision or a financing announcement. Screening on any one of the three in isolation produces mostly false positives. Rows marked as split-affected belong in none of it: a split between the two settlement dates rebases the share count, so their change reflects arithmetic rather than anyone trading, and they are marked precisely so they can be set aside.

Q Does high short interest mean a stock will fall?
A

No. Short interest records positioning, not outcomes. Institutions short for hedging as well as for directional bets, so a large position may be one leg of a trade rather than a view on the company. Heavily shorted stocks have both fallen and risen sharply; the data tells you who is positioned how, and nothing about who is right.