AMJB: New JPMorgan auto-callable notes tied to MerQube Tech+ index

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC is issuing $1,150,000 of Review Notes linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index, fully and unconditionally guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co. The notes may be automatically called as early as November 24, 2026 if the Index closes at or above the Call Value, paying $1,000 plus a growing call premium that reaches up to 105% of principal by the final review date.

The notes have a 20.00% downside buffer, but if the Index falls more than this and is not called, investors lose 1% of principal for each 1% decline beyond the buffer, up to an 80.00% loss. The Index embeds a 6.0% per annum daily deduction and a notional financing cost, which drag on performance versus the QQQ-based strategy it tracks. The price to public is $1,000 per note, including $44 in fees and commissions, while the estimated value is $899.40, and the notes carry full issuer and guarantor credit risk.

November 20, 2025
Registration Statement Nos. 333-270004 and 333-270004-01; Rule 424(b)(2)
Pricing supplement to product supplement no. 4-I dated April 13, 2023, underlying supplement no. 5-III dated March 5, 2025, the prospectus and
prospectus supplement, each dated April 13, 2023, and the prospectus addendum dated June 3, 2024
JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC
Structured Investments
$1,150,000
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol
Advantage Index due November 26, 2032
Fully and Unconditionally Guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co.
● The notes are designed for investors who seek early exit prior to maturity at a premium if, on any Review Date, the closing
level of the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index, which we refer to as the Index, is at or above the Call Value.
● The earliest date on which an automatic call may be initiated is November 24, 2026.
● Investors should be willing to forgo interest and dividend payments and be willing to lose up to 80.00% of their principal
amount at maturity.
● The Index is subject to a 6.0% per annum daily deduction, and the performance of the Invesco QQQ TrustSM, Series
1 (the “QQQ Fund”) is subject to a notional financing cost. These deductions will offset any appreciation of the
components of the Index, will heighten any depreciation of those components and will generally be a drag on the
performance of the Index. The Index will trail the performance of an identical index without such deductions. See
“Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Notes Generally — The Level of the Index Will Include a
6.0% per Annum Daily Deduction” and “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Notes Generally —
The Level of the Index Will Include the Deduction of a Notional Financing Cost” in this pricing supplement.
● The notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, which we refer to as
JPMorgan Financial, the payment on which is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Any
payment on the notes is subject to the credit risk of JPMorgan Financial, as issuer of the notes, and the credit risk
of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as guarantor of the notes.
● Minimum denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof
● The notes priced on November 20, 2025 and are expected to settle on or about November 25, 2025.
● CUSIP: 48136LNW5
Investing in the notes involves a number of risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page S-2 of the accompanying
prospectus supplement, Annex A to the accompanying prospectus addendum, “Risk Factors” beginning on page PS-11 of
the accompanying product supplement, “Risk Factors” beginning on page US-4 of the accompanying underlying
supplement and “Selected Risk Considerations” beginning on page PS-7 of this pricing supplement.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of
the notes or passed upon the accuracy or the adequacy of this pricing supplement or the accompanying product supplement,
underlying supplement, prospectus supplement, prospectus and prospectus addendum. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
Price to Public (1)
Fees and Commissions (2)
Proceeds to Issuer
Per note
$1,000
$44
$956
Total
$1,150,000
$50,600
$1,099,400
(1) See “Supplemental Use of Proceeds” in this pricing supplement for information about the components of the price to public of the
notes.
(2) J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, which we refer to as JPMS, acting as agent for JPMorgan Financial, will pay all of the selling commissions
of $44.00 per $1,000 principal amount note it receives from us to other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers. See “Plan of Distribution (Conflicts
of Interest)” in the accompanying product supplement.
The estimated value of the notes, when the terms of the notes were set, was $899.40 per $1,000 principal amount note. See
“The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement for additional information.
The notes are not bank deposits, are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency
and are not obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank.

PS-1| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
Key Terms
Issuer: JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, a direct,
wholly owned finance subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Guarantor: JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Index: The MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
(Bloomberg ticker: MQUSTVA). The level of the Index reflects a
deduction of 6.0% per annum that accrues daily, and the
performance of the QQQ Fund is subject to a notional financing
cost that accrues daily.
Call Premium Amount: As specified under “Key Terms Relating
to the Call Premium Amount” in this pricing supplement.
Call Value: 100.00% of the Initial Value
Buffer Amount: 20.00%
Pricing Date: November 20, 2025
Original Issue Date (Settlement Date): On or about November
25, 2025
Review Dates*: November 24, 2026, December 21, 2026,
January 20, 2027, February 22, 2027, March 22, 2027, April 20,
2027, May 20, 2027, June 21, 2027, July 20, 2027, August 20,
2027, September 20, 2027, October 20, 2027, November 22,
2027, December 20, 2027, January 20, 2028, February 22,
2028, March 20, 2028, April 20, 2028, May 22, 2028, June 20,
2028, July 20, 2028, August 21, 2028, September 20, 2028,
October 20, 2028, November 20, 2028, December 20, 2028,
January 22, 2029, February 20, 2029, March 20, 2029, April 20,
2029, May 21, 2029, June 20, 2029, July 20, 2029, August 20,
2029, September 20, 2029, October 22, 2029, November 20,
2029, December 20, 2029, January 22, 2030, February 20,
2030, March 20, 2030, April 22, 2030, May 20, 2030, June 20,
2030, July 22, 2030, August 20, 2030, September 20, 2030,
October 21, 2030, November 20, 2030, December 20, 2030,
January 21, 2031, February 20, 2031, March 20, 2031, April 21,
2031, May 20, 2031, June 20, 2031, July 21, 2031, August 20,
2031, September 22, 2031, October 20, 2031, November 20,
2031, December 22, 2031, January 20, 2032, February 20,
2032, March 22, 2032, April 20, 2032, May 20, 2032, June 21,
2032, July 20, 2032, August 20, 2032, September 20, 2032,
October 20, 2032 and November 22, 2032 (final Review Date)
Call Settlement Dates*: November 30, 2026, December 24,
2026, January 25, 2027, February 25, 2027, March 25, 2027,
April 23, 2027, May 25, 2027, June 24, 2027, July 23, 2027,
August 25, 2027, September 23, 2027, October 25, 2027,
November 26, 2027, December 23, 2027, January 25, 2028,
February 25, 2028, March 23, 2028, April 25, 2028, May 25,
2028, June 23, 2028, July 25, 2028, August 24, 2028,
September 25, 2028, October 25, 2028, November 24, 2028,
December 26, 2028, January 25, 2029, February 23, 2029,
March 23, 2029, April 25, 2029, May 24, 2029, June 25, 2029,
July 25, 2029, August 23, 2029, September 25, 2029, October
25, 2029, November 26, 2029, December 26, 2029, January 25,
2030, February 25, 2030, March 25, 2030, April 25, 2030, May
23, 2030, June 25, 2030, July 25, 2030, August 23, 2030,
September 25, 2030, October 24, 2030, November 25, 2030,
December 26, 2030, January 24, 2031, February 25, 2031,
March 25, 2031, April 24, 2031, May 23, 2031, June 25, 2031,
July 24, 2031, August 25, 2031, September 25, 2031, October
23, 2031, November 25, 2031, December 26, 2031, January 23,
2032, February 25, 2032, March 25, 2032, April 23, 2032, May
25, 2032, June 24, 2032, July 23, 2032, August 25, 2032,
September 23, 2032, October 25, 2032 and the Maturity Date
Maturity Date*: November 26, 2032
Automatic Call:
If the closing level of the Index on any Review Date is greater
than or equal to the Call Value, the notes will be automatically
called for a cash payment, for each $1,000 principal amount
note, equal to (a) $1,000 plus (b) the Call Premium Amount
applicable to that Review Date, payable on the applicable Call
Settlement Date. No further payments will be made on the
notes.
Payment at Maturity:
If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final
Value is less than the Initial Value by up to the Buffer Amount,
you will receive the principal amount of your notes at maturity.
If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final
Value is less than the Initial Value by more than the Buffer
Amount, your payment at maturity per $1,000 principal amount
note will be calculated as follows:
$1,000 + [$1,000 × (Index Return + Buffer Amount)]
If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final
Value is less than the Initial Value by more than the Buffer
Amount, you will lose some or most of your principal amount at
maturity.
Index Return:
(Final Value – Initial Value)
Initial Value
Initial Value: The closing level of the Index on the Pricing
Date, which was 11,632.39
Final Value: The closing level of the Index on the final Review
Date
* Subject to postponement in the event of a market disruption
event and as described under “Supplemental Terms of the
Notes — Postponement of a Determination Date — Notes
Linked Solely to an Index” in the accompanying underlying
supplement and “General Terms of Notes — Postponement of
a Payment Date” in the accompanying product supplement

PS-2| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
Key Terms Relating to the Call Premium Amount
Call Premium Amount: The Call Premium Amount with respect to
each Review Date is set forth below:
● first Review Date:
15.00% × $1,000
● second Review Date:
16.25% × $1,000
● third Review Date:
17.50% × $1,000
● fourth Review Date:
18.75% × $1,000
● fifth Review Date:
20.00% × $1,000
● sixth Review Date:
21.25% × $1,000
● seventh Review Date:
22.50% × $1,000
● eighth Review Date:
23.75% × $1,000
● ninth Review Date:
25.00% × $1,000
● tenth Review Date:
26.25% × $1,000
● eleventh Review Date:
27.50% × $1,000
● twelfth Review Date:
28.75% × $1,000
● thirteenth Review Date:
30.00% × $1,000
● fourteenth Review Date:
31.25% × $1,000
● fifteenth Review Date:
32.50% × $1,000
● sixteenth Review Date:
33.75% × $1,000
● seventeenth Review Date:
35.00% × $1,000
● eighteenth Review Date:
36.25% × $1,000
● nineteenth Review Date:
37.50% × $1,000
● twentieth Review Date:
38.75% × $1,000
● twenty-first Review Date:
40.00% × $1,000
● twenty-second Review Date:
41.25% × $1,000
● twenty-third Review Date:
42.50% × $1,000
● twenty-fourth Review Date:
43.75% × $1,000
● twenty-fifth Review Date:
45.00% × $1,000
● twenty-sixth Review Date:
46.25% × $1,000
● twenty-seventh Review Date:
47.50% × $1,000
● twenty-eighth Review Date:
48.75% × $1,000
● twenty-ninth Review Date:
50.00% × $1,000
● thirtieth Review Date:
51.25% × $1,000
● thirty-first Review Date:
52.50% × $1,000
● thirty-second Review Date:
53.75% × $1,000
● thirty-third Review Date:
55.00% × $1,000
● thirty-fourth Review Date:
56.25% × $1,000
● thirty-fifth Review Date:
57.50% × $1,000
● thirty-sixth Review Date:
58.75% × $1,000
● thirty-seventh Review Date:
60.00% × $1,000
● thirty-eighth Review Date:
61.25% × $1,000
● thirty-ninth Review Date:
62.50% × $1,000
● fortieth Review Date:
63.75% × $1,000
● forty-first Review Date:
65.00% × $1,000
● forty-second Review Date:
66.25% × $1,000
● forty-third Review Date:
67.50% × $1,000
● forty-fourth Review Date:
68.75% × $1,000
● forty-fifth Review Date:
70.00% × $1,000
● forty-sixth Review Date:
71.25% × $1,000
● forty-seventh Review Date:
72.50% × $1,000
● forty-eighth Review Date:
73.75% × $1,000
● forty-ninth Review Date:
75.00% × $1,000
● fiftieth Review Date:
76.25% × $1,000
● fifty-first Review Date:
77.50% × $1,000
● fifty-second Review Date:
78.75% × $1,000
● fifty-third Review Date:
80.00% × $1,000
● fifty-fourth Review Date:
81.25% × $1,000
● fifty-fifth Review Date:
82.50% × $1,000
● fifty-sixth Review Date:
83.75% × $1,000
● fifty-seventh Review Date:
85.00% × $1,000
● fifty-eighth Review Date:
86.25% × $1,000
● fifty-ninth Review Date:
87.50% × $1,000
● sixtieth Review Date:
88.75% × $1,000
● sixty-first Review Date:
90.00% × $1,000
● sixty-second Review Date:
91.25% × $1,000
● sixty-third Review Date:
92.50% × $1,000
● sixty-fourth Review Date:
93.75% × $1,000
● sixty-fifth Review Date:
95.00% × $1,000
● sixty-sixth Review Date:
96.25% × $1,000
● sixty-seventh Review Date:
97.50% × $1,000
● sixty-eighth Review Date:
98.75% × $1,000
● sixty-ninth Review Date:
100.00% × $1,000
● seventieth Review Date:
101.25% × $1,000
● seventy-first Review Date:
102.50% × $1,000
● seventy-second Review
Date:
103.75% × $1,000
● final Review Date:
105.00% × $1,000

PS-3| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
The MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
The MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index (the “Index”) was developed by MerQube (the “Index Sponsor” and “Index Calculation
Agent”), in coordination with JPMS, and is maintained by the Index Sponsor and is calculated and published by the Index Calculation
Agent. The Index was established on June 22, 2021. An affiliate of ours currently has a 10% equity interest in the Index Sponsor, with a
right to appoint an employee of JPMS, another of our affiliates, as a member of the board of directors of the Index Sponsor.
Since February 9, 2024 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), the underlying asset to which the Index is linked (the “Underlying Asset”)
has been an unfunded position in the QQQ Fund, calculated as the excess of the total return of the QQQ Fund over a notional financing
cost. Prior to the Amendment Effective Date, the Underlying Asset was an unfunded rolling position in E-Mini Nasdaq-100 futures (the
“Futures Contracts”).
The investment objective of the QQQ Fund is to seek to track the investment results, before fees and expenses, of the Nasdaq-100
Index®. For more information about the QQQ Fund and the Nasdaq-100 Index®, see “Background on the Invesco QQQ TrustSM, Series
1” and “Background on the Nasdaq-100 Index®,” respectively, in the accompanying underlying supplement.
The Index attempts to provide a dynamic rules-based exposure to the Underlying Asset, while targeting a level of implied volatility, with
a maximum exposure to the Underlying Asset of 500% and a minimum exposure to the Underlying Asset of 0%. The Index is subject to
a 6.0% per annum daily deduction, and the performance of the Underlying Asset is subject to a notional financing cost deducted daily.
On each weekly Index rebalance day, the exposure to the Underlying Asset is set equal to (a) the 35% implied volatility target (the
“target volatility”) divided by (b) the one-week implied volatility of the QQQ Fund, subject to a maximum exposure of 500%. For
example, if the implied volatility of the QQQ Fund is equal to 17.5%, the exposure to the Underlying Asset will equal 200% (or 35% /
17.5%) and if the implied volatility of the QQQ Fund is equal to 40%, the exposure to the Underlying Asset will equal 87.5% (or 35% /
40%). The Index’s exposure to the Underlying Asset will be greater than 100% when the implied volatility of the QQQ Fund is below
35%, and the Index’s exposure to the Underlying Asset will be less than 100% when the implied volatility of the QQQ Fund is above
35%. In general, the Index’s target volatility feature is expected to result in the volatility of the Index being more stable over time than if
no target volatility feature were employed. No assurance can be provided that the volatility of the Index will be stable at any time. The
Index uses the implied volatility of the QQQ Fund as a proxy for the realized volatility of the Underlying Asset.
The Index tracks the performance of the QQQ Fund, with distributions, if any, notionally reinvested, less the daily deduction of a
notional financing cost. The notional financing cost is intended to approximate the cost of maintaining a position in the QQQ Fund using
borrowed funds at a rate of interest equal to SOFR plus a spread of 0.50% per annum. SOFR, the Secured Overnight Financing Rate,
is intended to be a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities. The Index is an “excess
return” index and not a “total return” index because, as part of the calculation of the level of the Index, the performance of the QQQ
Fund is reduced by the notional financing cost. The notional financing cost has been deducted from the performance of the QQQ Fund
since the Amendment Effective Date.
The 6.0% per annum daily deduction and the notional financing cost will offset any appreciation of the Underlying Asset, will heighten
any depreciation of the Underlying Asset and will generally be a drag on the performance of the Index. The Index will trail the
performance of an identical index without such deductions.
Holding the estimated value of the notes and market conditions constant, the Call Premium Amounts, the Buffer Amount and the other
economic terms available on the notes are more favorable to investors than the terms that would be available on a hypothetical note
issued by us linked to an identical index without a daily deduction. However, there can be no assurance that any improvement in the
terms of the notes derived from the daily deduction will offset the negative effect of the daily deduction on the performance of the Index.
The return on the notes may be lower than the return on a hypothetical note issued by us linked to an identical index without a daily
deduction.
The daily deduction and the volatility of the Index (as influenced by the Index’s target volatility feature) are two of the primary variables
that affect the economic terms of the notes. Additionally, the daily deduction and volatility of the Index are two of the inputs our affiliates’
internal pricing models use to value the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes for purposes of determining
the estimated value of the notes set forth on the cover of this pricing supplement. The daily deduction will effectively reduce the value of
the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” and “Selected Risk
Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
The Index is subject to risks associated with the use of significant leverage. The notional financing cost deducted daily will be
magnified by any leverage provided by the Index. In addition, the Index may be significantly uninvested on any given day,
and, in that case, will realize only a portion of any gains due to appreciation of the Underlying Asset on that day. The index
deduction is deducted daily at a rate of 6.0% per annum, even when the Index is not fully invested.
No assurance can be given that the investment strategy used to construct the Index will achieve its intended results or that
the Index will be successful or will outperform any alternative index or strategy that might reference the Underlying Asset.
For additional information about the Index, see “The MerQube Vol Advantage Index Series” in the accompanying underlying
supplement.

PS-4| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
Supplemental Terms of the Notes
Any value of any underlier, and any values derived therefrom, included in this pricing supplement may be corrected, in the event of
manifest error or inconsistency, by amendment of this pricing supplement and the corresponding terms of the notes. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in the indenture governing the notes, that amendment will become effective without consent of the holders of
the notes or any other party.
How the Notes Work
Payment upon an Automatic Call
Review Dates
Call
Value
Compare the closing level of the Index to the Call Value on each Review Date unless previously automatically called.
The closing level of
the Index is greater
than or equal to
the Call Value.
Automatic Call
The notes will be automatically called on the applicable Call Settlement Date and you will
receive (a) $1,000 plus (b) the Call Premium Amount applicable to that Review Date.
No further payments will be made on the notes.
The closing level of
the Index is less
than the Call
Value.
No Automatic Call
The notes will not be automatically called. Proceed to the next Review Date, if any.
Payment at Maturity If the Notes Have Not Been Automatically Called
Review Dates
Final Review Date
Payment at Maturity
The Final Value of the Index is less than the
Initial Value by up to the Buffer Amount.
You will receive the principal amount of
your notes.
The notes have not
been automatically
called. Proceed to the
payment at maturity.
The Final Value of the Index is less than the
Initial Value by more than the Buffer Amount.
You will receive:
$1,000 + [$1,000 × (Index Return + Buffer
Amount)]
Under these circumstances, you will lose
some or most of your principal amount at
maturity.

PS-5| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
Call Premium Amount
The table below illustrates the Call Premium Amount per $1,000 principal amount note for each Review Date based on the Call
Premium Amounts set forth under “Key Terms — Call Premium Amount” above.
Review Date
Call Premium Amount
First
$150.00
Second
$162.50
Third
$175.00
Fourth
$187.50
Fifth
$200.00
Sixth
$212.50
Seventh
$225.00
Eighth
$237.50
Ninth
$250.00
Tenth
$262.50
Eleventh
$275.00
Twelfth
$287.50
Thirteenth
$300.00
Fourteenth
$312.50
Fifteenth
$325.00
Sixteenth
$337.50
Seventeenth
$350.00
Eighteenth
$362.50
Nineteenth
$375.00
Twentieth
$387.50
Twenty-First
$400.00
Twenty-Second
$412.50
Twenty-Third
$425.00
Twenty-Fourth
$437.50
Twenty-Fifth
$450.00
Twenty-Sixth
$462.50
Twenty-Seventh
$475.00
Twenty-Eighth
$487.50
Twenty-Ninth
$500.00
Thirtieth
$512.50
Thirty-First
$525.00
Thirty-Second
$537.50
Thirty-Third
$550.00
Thirty-Fourth
$562.50
Thirty-Fifth
$575.00
Thirty-Sixth
$587.50
Thirty-Seventh
$600.00
Thirty-Eighth
$612.50
Thirty-Ninth
$625.00
Fortieth
$637.50
Forty-First
$650.00
Forty-Second
$662.50
Forty-Third
$675.00
Forty-Fourth
$687.50
Forty-Fifth
$700.00
Forty-Sixth
$712.50
Forty-Seventh
$725.00
Forty-Eighth
$737.50
Forty-Ninth
$750.00
Fiftieth
$762.50
Fifty-First
$775.00
Fifty-Second
$787.50
Fifty-Third
$800.00
Fifty-Fourth
$812.50
Fifty-Fifth
$825.00
Fifty-Sixth
$837.50
Fifty-Seventh
$850.00
Fifty-Eighth
$862.50

PS-6| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
Fifty-Ninth
$875.00
Sixtieth
$887.50
Sixty-First
$900.00
Sixty-Second
$912.50
Sixty-Third
$925.00
Sixty-Fourth
$937.50
Sixty-Fifth
$950.00
Sixty-Sixth
$962.50
Sixty-Seventh
$975.00
Sixty-Eighth
$987.50
Sixty-Ninth
$1,000.00
Seventieth
$1,012.50
Seventy-First
$1,025.00
Seventy-Second
$1,037.50
Final
$1,050.00
Hypothetical Payout Examples
The following examples illustrate payments on the notes linked to a hypothetical Index, assuming a range of performances for the
hypothetical Index on the Review Dates.
In addition, the hypothetical payments set forth below assume the following:
● an Initial Value of 100.00;
● a Call Value of 100.00 (equal to 100.00% of the hypothetical Initial Value);
● a Buffer Amount of 20.00%; and
● the Call Premium Amounts set forth under “Key Terms — Call Premium Amount” above.
The hypothetical Initial Value of 100.00 has been chosen for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the actual Initial Value.
The actual Initial Value is the closing level of the Index on the Pricing Date and is specified under “Key Terms — Initial Value” in this
pricing supplement. For historical data regarding the actual closing levels of the Index, please see the historical information set forth
under “Hypothetical Back-Tested Data and Historical Information” in this pricing supplement.
Each hypothetical payment set forth below is for illustrative purposes only and may not be the actual payment applicable to a purchaser
of the notes. The numbers appearing in the following examples have been rounded for ease of analysis.
Example 1 — Notes are automatically called on the first Review Date.
Date
Closing Level
First Review Date
110.00
Notes are automatically called
Total Payment
$1,150.00 (15.00% return)
Because the closing level of the Index on the first Review Date is greater than or equal to the Call Value, the notes will be automatically
called for a cash payment, for each $1,000 principal amount note, of $1,150.00 (or $1,000 plus the Call Premium Amount applicable to
the first Review Date), payable on the applicable Call Settlement Date. No further payments will be made on the notes.
Example 2 — Notes are automatically called on the final Review Date.
Date
Closing Level
First Review Date
90.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Second Review Date
85.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Third through
Seventysecond Review
Dates
Less than Call Value
Notes NOT automatically called
Final Review Date
150.00
Notes are automatically called
Total Payment
$2,050.00 (105.00% return)
Because the closing level of the Index on the final Review Date is greater than or equal to the Call Value, the notes will be automatically
called for a cash payment, for each $1,000 principal amount note, of $2,050.00 (or $1,000 plus the Call Premium Amount applicable to
the final Review Date), payable on the applicable Call Settlement Date, which is the Maturity Date.

PS-7| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
Example 3 — Notes have NOT been automatically called and the Final Value is less than the Initial Value by up to
the Buffer Amount.
Date
Closing Level
First Review Date
90.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Second Review Date
85.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Third through
Seventysecond Review
Dates
Less than Call Value
Notes NOT automatically called
Final Review Date
80.00
Notes NOT automatically called; Final Value is less than the Initial
Value by up to the Buffer Amount
Total Payment
$1,000.00 (0.00% return)
Because the notes have not been automatically called and the Final Value is less than the Initial Value by up to the Buffer Amount, the
payment at maturity, for each $1,000 principal amount note, will be $1,000.00.
Example 4 — Notes have NOT been automatically called and the Final Value is less than the Initial Value by more
than the Buffer Amount.
Date
Closing Level
First Review Date
80.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Second Review Date
75.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Third through
Seventysecond Review
Dates
Less than Call Value
Notes NOT automatically called
Final Review Date
50.00
Notes NOT automatically called; Final Value is less than the Initial
Value by more than the Buffer Amount
Total Payment
$700.00 (-30.00% return)
Because the notes have not been automatically called, the Final Value is less than the Initial Value by more than the Buffer Amount and
the Index Return is -50.00%, the payment at maturity will be $700.00 per $1,000 principal amount note, calculated as follows:
$1,000 + [$1,000 × (-50.00% + 20.00%)] = $700.00
The hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments on the notes shown above apply only if you hold the notes for their entire term
or until automatically called. These hypotheticals do not reflect the fees or expenses that would be associated with any sale in the
secondary market. If these fees and expenses were included, the hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments shown above would
likely be lower.
Selected Risk Considerations
An investment in the notes involves significant risks. These risks are explained in more detail in the “Risk Factors” sections of the
accompanying prospectus supplement, product supplement and underlying supplement and in Annex A to the accompanying
prospectus addendum.
Risks Relating to the Notes Generally
● YOUR INVESTMENT IN THE NOTES MAY RESULT IN A LOSS —
The notes do not guarantee any return of principal. If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final Value is less than
the Initial Value by more than 20.00%, you will lose 1% of the principal amount of your notes for every 1% that the Final Value is
less than the Initial Value by more than 20.00%. Accordingly, under these circumstances, you will lose up to 80.00% of your
principal amount at maturity.
● THE LEVEL OF THE INDEX WILL INCLUDE A 6.0% PER ANNUM DAILY DEDUCTION —
The Index is subject to a 6.0% per annum daily deduction. As a result, the level of the Index will trail the value of an identically
constituted synthetic portfolio that is not subject to any such deduction.
This deduction will place a significant drag on the performance of the Index, potentially offsetting positive returns on the Index’s
investment strategy, exacerbating negative returns of its investment strategy and causing the level of the Index to decline steadily if
the return of its investment strategy is relatively flat. The Index will not appreciate unless the return of its investment strategy is
sufficient to offset the negative effects of this deduction, and then only to the extent that the return of its investment strategy is
greater than this deduction. As a result of this deduction, the level of the Index may decline even if the return of its investment
strategy is otherwise positive.
The daily deduction is one of the inputs our affiliates’ internal pricing models use to value the derivative or derivatives underlying
the economic terms of the notes for purposes of determining the estimated value of the notes set forth on the cover of this pricing
supplement. The daily deduction will effectively reduce the value of the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of
the notes. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” and “— Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of
the Notes” in this pricing supplement.

PS-8| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
● THE LEVEL OF THE INDEX WILL INCLUDE THE DEDUCTION OF A NOTIONAL FINANCING COST —
Since the Amendment Effective Date, the performance of the Underlying Asset has been subject to a notional financing cost
deducted daily. The notional financing cost is intended to approximate the cost of maintaining a position in the QQQ Fund using
borrowed funds at a rate of interest equal to the daily SOFR rate plus a fixed spread. The actual cost of maintaining a position in
the QQQ Fund at any time may be less than the notional financing cost. As a result of this deduction, the level of the Index will trail
the value of an identically constituted synthetic portfolio that is not subject to any such deduction.
● CREDIT RISKS OF JPMORGAN FINANCIAL AND JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. —
Investors are dependent on our and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s ability to pay all amounts due on the notes. Any actual or potential
change in our or JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s creditworthiness or credit spreads, as determined by the market for taking that credit
risk, is likely to adversely affect the value of the notes. If we and JPMorgan Chase & Co. were to default on our payment
obligations, you may not receive any amounts owed to you under the notes and you could lose your entire investment.
● AS A FINANCE SUBSIDIARY, JPMORGAN FINANCIAL HAS NO INDEPENDENT OPERATIONS AND HAS LIMITED ASSETS
—
As a finance subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co., we have no independent operations beyond the issuance and administration of
our securities and the collection of intercompany obligations. Aside from the initial capital contribution from JPMorgan Chase & Co.,
substantially all of our assets relate to obligations of JPMorgan Chase & Co. to make payments under loans made by us to
JPMorgan Chase & Co. or under other intercompany agreements. As a result, we are dependent upon payments from JPMorgan
Chase & Co. to meet our obligations under the notes. We are not a key operating subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and in a
bankruptcy or resolution of JPMorgan Chase & Co. we are not expected to have sufficient resources to meet our obligations in
respect of the notes as they come due. If JPMorgan Chase & Co. does not make payments to us and we are unable to make
payments on the notes, you may have to seek payment under the related guarantee by JPMorgan Chase & Co., and that
guarantee will rank pari passu with all other unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of JPMorgan Chase & Co. For more
information, see the accompanying prospectus addendum.
● THE APPRECIATION POTENTIAL OF THE NOTES IS LIMITED TO ANY CALL PREMIUM AMOUNT PAID ON THE NOTES,
regardless of any appreciation of the Index, which may be significant. You will not participate in any appreciation of the Index.
● THE AUTOMATIC CALL FEATURE MAY FORCE A POTENTIAL EARLY EXIT —
If your notes are automatically called, the term of the notes may be reduced to as short as approximately one year. There is no
guarantee that you would be able to reinvest the proceeds from an investment in the notes at a comparable return for a similar
level of risk. Even in cases where the notes are called before maturity, you are not entitled to any fees and commissions described
on the front cover of this pricing supplement.
● THE NOTES DO NOT PAY INTEREST.
● YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE DIVIDENDS ON THE QQQ FUND OR THE SECURITIES HELD BY THE QQQ FUND OR HAVE ANY
RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO THE QQQ FUND OR THOSE SECURITIES.
● JPMS AND ITS AFFILIATES MAY HAVE PUBLISHED RESEARCH, EXPRESSED OPINIONS OR PROVIDED
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT ARE INCONSISTENT WITH INVESTING IN OR HOLDING THE NOTES, AND MAY DO SO IN
THE FUTURE —
Any research, opinions or recommendations could affect the market value of the notes. Investors should undertake their own
independent investigation of the merits of investing in the notes, the Index and the components of the Index.
● LACK OF LIQUIDITY —
The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange. Accordingly, the price at which you may be able to trade your notes is likely
to depend on the price, if any, at which JPMS is willing to buy the notes. You may not be able to sell your notes. The notes are not
designed to be short-term trading instruments. Accordingly, you should be able and willing to hold your notes to maturity.
Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest
● POTENTIAL CONFLICTS —
We and our affiliates play a variety of roles in connection with the notes. In performing these duties, our and JPMorgan Chase &
Co.’s economic interests are potentially adverse to your interests as an investor in the notes. It is possible that hedging or trading
activities of ours or our affiliates in connection with the notes could result in substantial returns for us or our affiliates while the
value of the notes declines. Please refer to “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest” in the accompanying product
supplement.
An affiliate of ours currently has a 10% equity interest in the Index Sponsor, with a right to appoint an employee of JPMS, another
of our affiliates, as a member of the board of directors of the Index Sponsor. The Index Sponsor can implement policies, make
judgments or enact changes to the Index methodology that could negatively affect the performance of the Index. The Index
Sponsor can also alter, discontinue or suspend calculation or dissemination of the Index. Any of these actions could adversely
affect the value of the notes. The Index Sponsor has no obligation to consider your interests in calculating, maintaining or revising
the Index, and we, JPMS, our other affiliates and our respective employees are under no obligation to consider your interests as an
investor in the notes in connection with the role of our affiliate as an owner of an equity interest in the Index Sponsor or the role of
an employee of JPMS as a member of the board of directors of the Index Sponsor.
In addition, JPMS worked with the Index Sponsor in developing the guidelines and policies governing the composition and
calculation of the Index. Although judgments, policies and determinations concerning the Index were made by JPMS, JPMorgan
Chase & Co., as the parent company of JPMS, ultimately controls JPMS. The policies and judgments for which JPMS was
responsible could have an impact, positive or negative, on the level of the Index and the value of your notes. JPMS is under no
obligation to consider your interests as an investor in the notes in its role in developing the guidelines and policies governing the
Index or making judgments that may affect the level of the Index.

PS-9| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes
● THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES IS LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL ISSUE PRICE (PRICE TO PUBLIC) OF THE
NOTES —
The estimated value of the notes is only an estimate determined by reference to several factors. The original issue price of the
notes exceeds the estimated value of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring and hedging the notes are
included in the original issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions, the projected profits, if any, that our
affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimated cost of hedging
our obligations under the notes. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
● THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES DOES NOT REPRESENT FUTURE VALUES OF THE NOTES AND MAY DIFFER
FROM OTHERS’ ESTIMATES —
See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
● THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES IS DERIVED BY REFERENCE TO AN INTERNAL FUNDING RATE —
The internal funding rate used in the determination of the estimated value of the notes may differ from the market-implied funding
rate for vanilla fixed income instruments of a similar maturity issued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. Any difference may
be based on, among other things, our and our affiliates’ view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance,
operational and ongoing liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for the conventional fixed income
instruments of JPMorgan Chase & Co. This internal funding rate is based on certain market inputs and assumptions, which may
prove to be incorrect, and is intended to approximate the prevailing market replacement funding rate for the notes. The use of an
internal funding rate and any potential changes to that rate may have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and any
secondary market prices of the notes. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
● THE VALUE OF THE NOTES AS PUBLISHED BY JPMS (AND WHICH MAY BE REFLECTED ON CUSTOMER ACCOUNT
STATEMENTS) MAY BE HIGHER THAN THE THEN-CURRENT ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES FOR A LIMITED TIME
PERIOD —
We generally expect that some of the costs included in the original issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in
connection with any repurchases of your notes by JPMS in an amount that will decline to zero over an initial predetermined period.
See “Secondary Market Prices of the Notes” in this pricing supplement for additional information relating to this initial period.
Accordingly, the estimated value of your notes during this initial period may be lower than the value of the notes as published by
JPMS (and which may be shown on your customer account statements).
● SECONDARY MARKET PRICES OF THE NOTES WILL LIKELY BE LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL ISSUE PRICE OF THE
NOTES —
Any secondary market prices of the notes will likely be lower than the original issue price of the notes because, among other
things, secondary market prices take into account our internal secondary market funding rates for structured debt issuances and,
also, because secondary market prices may exclude selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if any, and estimated hedging
costs that are included in the original issue price of the notes. As a result, the price, if any, at which JPMS will be willing to buy the
notes from you in secondary market transactions, if at all, is likely to be lower than the original issue price. Any sale by you prior to
the Maturity Date could result in a substantial loss to you.
● SECONDARY MARKET PRICES OF THE NOTES WILL BE IMPACTED BY MANY ECONOMIC AND MARKET FACTORS —
The secondary market price of the notes during their term will be impacted by a number of economic and market factors, which
may either offset or magnify each other, aside from the selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if any, estimated hedging
costs and the level of the Index. Additionally, independent pricing vendors and/or third party broker-dealers may publish a price for
the notes, which may also be reflected on customer account statements. This price may be different (higher or lower) than the price
of the notes, if any, at which JPMS may be willing to purchase your notes in the secondary market. See “Risk Factors — Risks
Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — Secondary market prices of the notes will be
impacted by many economic and market factors” in the accompanying product supplement.
Risks Relating to the Index
● THE INDEX SPONSOR MAY ADJUST THE INDEX IN A WAY THAT AFFECTS ITS LEVEL, AND THE INDEX SPONSOR HAS
NO OBLIGATION TO CONSIDER YOUR INTERESTS —
The Index Sponsor is responsible for maintaining the Index. The Index Sponsor can add, delete or substitute the components of
the Index or make other methodological changes that could affect the level of the Index. The Index Sponsor has no obligation to
consider your interests in calculating or revising the Index.
● THE INDEX MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL OR OUTPERFORM ANY ALTERNATIVE STRATEGY THAT MIGHT BE EMPLOYED
IN RESPECT OF THE UNDERLYING ASSET —
No assurance can be given that the investment strategy on which the Index is based will be successful or that the Index will
outperform any alternative strategy that might be employed with respect to the Underlying Asset.
● THE INDEX MAY NOT APPROXIMATE ITS TARGET VOLATILITY —
No assurance can be given that the Index will maintain an annualized realized volatility that approximates its target volatility of
35%. The Index’s target volatility is a level of implied volatility and therefore the actual realized volatility of the Index may be greater
or less than the target volatility. On each weekly Index rebalance day, the Index’s exposure to the Underlying Asset is set equal to
(a) the 35% implied volatility target divided by (b) the one-week implied volatility of the QQQ Fund, subject to a maximum exposure
of 500%. The Index uses the implied volatility of the QQQ Fund as a proxy for the realized volatility of the Underlying Asset.
However, there is no guarantee that the methodology used by the Index to determine the implied volatility of the QQQ Fund will be
representative of the realized volatility of the QQQ Fund. The volatility of the Underlying Asset on any day may change quickly and
unexpectedly and realized volatility may differ significantly from implied volatility. In general, over time, the realized volatility of the
QQQ Fund has tended to be lower than its implied volatility; however, at any time that realized volatility may exceed its implied
volatility, particularly during periods of market volatility. Accordingly, the actual annualized realized volatility of the Index may be
greater than or less than the target volatility, which may adversely affect the level of the Index and the value of the notes.

PS-10| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
● THE INDEX IS SUBJECT TO RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF SIGNIFICANT LEVERAGE —
On a weekly Index rebalance day, the Index will employ leverage to increase the exposure of the Index to the Underlying Asset if
the implied volatility of the QQQ Fund is below 35%, subject to a maximum exposure of 500%. Under normal market conditions in
the past, the QQQ Fund has tended to exhibit an implied volatility below 35%. Accordingly, the Index has generally employed
leverage in the past, except during periods of elevated volatility. When leverage is employed, any movements in the prices of the
Underlying Asset will result in greater changes in the level of the Index than if leverage were not used. In particular, the use of
leverage will magnify any negative performance of the Underlying Asset, which, in turn, would negatively affect the performance of
the Index. Because the Index’s leverage is adjusted only on a weekly basis, in situations where a significant increase in volatility is
accompanied by a significant decline in the price of the Underlying Asset, the level of the Index may decline significantly before the
following Index rebalance day when the Index’s exposure to the Underlying Asset would be reduced. In addition, the notional
financing cost deducted daily will be magnified by any leverage provided by the Index.
● THE INDEX MAY BE SIGNIFICANTLY UNINVESTED —
On a weekly Index rebalance day, the Index’s exposure to the Underlying Asset will be less than 100% when the implied volatility
of the QQQ Fund is above 35%. If the Index’s exposure to the Underlying Asset is less than 100%, the Index will not be fully
invested, and any uninvested portion will earn no return. The Index may be significantly uninvested on any given day, and will
realize only a portion of any gains due to appreciation of the Underlying Asset on any such day. The 6.0% per annum deduction is
deducted daily, even when the Index is not fully invested.
● AN INVESTMENT IN THE NOTES WILL BE SUBJECT TO RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH NON-U.S. SECURITIES —
Some of the equity securities held by the QQQ Fund are issued by non-U.S. companies. Investments in securities linked to the
value of such non-U.S. equity securities involve risks associated with the home countries of the issuers of those non-U.S. equity
securities. The prices of securities issued by non-U.S. companies may be affected by political, economic, financial and social
factors in the home countries of those issuers, or global regions, including changes in government, economic and fiscal policies
and currency exchange laws.
● THERE ARE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE QQQ FUND —
The QQQ Fund is subject to management risk, which is the risk that the investment strategies of the QQQ Fund’s investment
adviser, the implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. These constraints
could adversely affect the market price of the shares of the QQQ Fund and, consequently, the value of the notes.
● THE PERFORMANCE AND MARKET VALUE OF THE QQQ FUND, PARTICULARLY DURING PERIODS OF MARKET
VOLATILITY, MAY NOT CORRELATE WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE QQQ FUND’S UNDERLYING INDEX AS WELL AS
THE NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE —
The QQQ Fund does not fully replicate its underlying index and may hold securities different from those included in its underlying
index. In addition, the performance of the QQQ Fund will reflect additional transaction costs and fees that are not included in the
calculation of its underlying index. All of these factors may lead to a lack of correlation between the performance of the QQQ Fund
and its underlying index. In addition, corporate actions with respect to the equity securities underlying the QQQ Fund (such as
mergers and spin-offs) may impact the variance between the performances of the QQQ Fund and its underlying index. Finally,
because the shares of the QQQ Fund are traded on a securities exchange and are subject to market supply and investor demand,
the market value of one share of the QQQ Fund may differ from the net asset value per share of the QQQ Fund.
During periods of market volatility, securities underlying the QQQ Fund may be unavailable in the secondary market, market
participants may be unable to calculate accurately the net asset value per share of the QQQ Fund and the liquidity of the QQQ
Fund may be adversely affected. This kind of market volatility may also disrupt the ability of market participants to create and
redeem shares of the QQQ Fund. Further, market volatility may adversely affect, sometimes materially, the prices at which market
participants are willing to buy and sell shares of the QQQ Fund. As a result, under these circumstances, the market value of shares
of the QQQ Fund may vary substantially from the net asset value per share of the QQQ Fund. For all of the foregoing reasons, the
performance of the QQQ Fund may not correlate with the performance of its underlying index as well as the net asset value per
share of the QQQ Fund, which could materially and adversely affect the value of the notes in the secondary market and/or reduce
any payment on the notes.
● HYPOTHETICAL BACK-TESTED DATA RELATING TO THE INDEX DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HISTORICAL DATA AND
ARE SUBJECT TO INHERENT LIMITATIONS, AND THE HISTORICAL AND HYPOTHETICAL BACK-TESTED
PERFORMANCE OF THE INDEX ARE NOT INDICATIONS OF ITS FUTURE PERFORMANCE —
The hypothetical back-tested performance of the Index set forth under “Hypothetical Back-Tested Data and Historical Information”
in this pricing supplement is purely theoretical and does not represent the actual historical performance of the Index and has not
been verified by an independent third party. Hypothetical back-tested performance measures have inherent limitations.
Hypothetical back-tested performance is derived by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model that has been
designed with the benefit of hindsight. Alternative modelling techniques might produce significantly different results and may prove
to be more appropriate. Past performance, and especially hypothetical back-tested performance, is not indicative of future results.
This type of information has inherent limitations, and you should carefully consider these limitations before placing reliance on such
information.
In addition, the QQQ Fund replaced the Futures Contracts as the Underlying Asset on the Amendment Effective Date. No
assurance can be provided that the QQQ Fund is an appropriate substitute for the Futures Contracts. This replacement may
adversely affect the performance of the Index and the value of the notes, as the QQQ Fund, subject to a notional financing cost,
may perform worse, perhaps significantly worse, than the Futures Contracts. The Index lacks any operating history with the QQQ
Fund as the Underlying Asset prior to the Amendment Effective Date and may perform in unanticipated ways. Investors in the
notes should bear this difference in mind when evaluating the historical and hypothetical back-tested performance shown in this
pricing supplement.
● OTHER KEY RISK:
o THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED ON JUNE 22, 2021 AND MAY PERFORM IN UNANTICIPATED WAYS.
Please refer to the “Risk Factors” section of the accompanying underlying supplement for more details regarding the above-
listed and other risks.

PS-11| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
Hypothetical Back-Tested Data and Historical Information
The following graph sets forth the hypothetical back-tested performance of the Index based on the hypothetical back-tested weekly
closing levels of the Index from January 3, 2020 through June 18, 2021, and the historical performance of the Index based on the
weekly historical closing levels of the Index from June 25, 2021 through November 14, 2025. The Index was established on June 22,
2021, as represented by the vertical line in the following graph. All data to the left of that vertical line reflect hypothetical back-tested
performance of the Index. All data to the right of that vertical line reflect actual historical performance of the Index. The closing level of
the Index on November 20, 2025 was 11,632.39. We obtained the closing levels above and below from the Bloomberg Professional®
service ("Bloomberg"), without independent verification.
The data for the hypothetical back-tested performance of the Index set forth in the following graph are purely theoretical and do not
represent the actual historical performance of the Index. See “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Index —
Hypothetical Back-Tested Data Relating to the Index Do Not Represent Actual Historical Data and Are Subject to Inherent Limitations,
and the Historical and Hypothetical Back-Tested Performance of the Index Are Not Indications of Its Future Performance” above.
The hypothetical back-tested and historical closing levels of the Index should not be taken as an indication of future performance, and
no assurance can be given as to the closing level of the Index on any Review Date. There can be no assurance that the performance of
the Index will result in the return of any of your principal amount in excess of $200.00 per $1,000 principal amount note, subject to the
credit risks of JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Hypothetical Back-Tested and Historical Performance of the
MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
Source: Bloomberg
The hypothetical back-tested closing levels of the Index have inherent limitations and have not been verified by an independent third
party. These hypothetical back-tested closing levels are determined by means of a retroactive application of a back-tested model
designed with the benefit of hindsight. Hypothetical back-tested results are neither an indicator nor a guarantee of future returns. No
representation is made that an investment in the notes will or is likely to achieve returns similar to those shown. Alternative modeling
techniques or assumptions would produce different hypothetical back-tested closing levels of the Index that might prove to be more
appropriate and that might differ significantly from the hypothetical back-tested closing levels of the Index set forth above.

PS-12| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
Tax Treatment
You should review carefully the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in the accompanying product
supplement no. 4-I. The following discussion, when read in combination with that section, constitutes the full opinion of our special tax
counsel, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, regarding the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and disposing of notes.
Based on current market conditions, in the opinion of our special tax counsel it is reasonable to treat the notes as “open transactions”
that are not debt instruments for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as more fully described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences — Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders — Notes Treated as Open Transactions That Are Not Debt Instruments” in the
accompanying product supplement. Assuming this treatment is respected, the gain or loss on your notes should be treated as long-term
capital gain or loss if you hold your notes for more than a year, whether or not you are an initial purchaser of notes at the issue price.
However, the IRS or a court may not respect this treatment, in which case the timing and character of any income or loss on the notes
could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, in 2007 Treasury and the IRS released a notice requesting comments on the
U.S. federal income tax treatment of “prepaid forward contracts” and similar instruments. The notice focuses in particular on whether to
require investors in these instruments to accrue income over the term of their investment. It also asks for comments on a number of
related topics, including the character of income or loss with respect to these instruments; the relevance of factors such as the nature of
the underlying property to which the instruments are linked; the degree, if any, to which income (including any mandated accruals)
realized by non-U.S. investors should be subject to withholding tax; and whether these instruments are or should be subject to the
“constructive ownership” regime, which very generally can operate to recharacterize certain long-term capital gain as ordinary income
and impose a notional interest charge. While the notice requests comments on appropriate transition rules and effective dates, any
Treasury regulations or other guidance promulgated after consideration of these issues could materially and adversely affect the tax
consequences of an investment in the notes, possibly with retroactive effect. You should consult your tax adviser regarding the U.S.
federal income tax consequences of an investment in the notes, including possible alternative treatments and the issues presented by
this notice.
Section 871(m) of the Code and Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder (“Section 871(m)”) generally impose a 30% withholding
tax (unless an income tax treaty applies) on dividend equivalents paid or deemed paid to Non-U.S. Holders with respect to certain
financial instruments linked to U.S. equities or indices that include U.S. equities. Section 871(m) provides certain exceptions to this
withholding regime, including for instruments linked to certain broad-based indices that meet requirements set forth in the applicable
Treasury regulations. Additionally, a recent IRS notice excludes from the scope of Section 871(m) instruments issued prior to January
1, 2027 that do not have a delta of one with respect to underlying securities that could pay U.S.-source dividends for U.S. federal
income tax purposes (each an “Underlying Security”). Based on certain determinations made by us, our special tax counsel is of the
opinion that Section 871(m) should not apply to the notes with regard to Non-U.S. Holders. Our determination is not binding on the IRS,
and the IRS may disagree with this determination. Section 871(m) is complex and its application may depend on your particular
circumstances, including whether you enter into other transactions with respect to an Underlying Security. You should consult your tax
adviser regarding the potential application of Section 871(m) to the notes.
The Estimated Value of the Notes
The estimated value of the notes set forth on the cover of this pricing supplement is equal to the sum of the values of the following
hypothetical components: (1) a fixed-income debt component with the same maturity as the notes, valued using the internal funding
rate described below, and (2) the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes. The estimated value of the notes
does not represent a minimum price at which JPMS would be willing to buy your notes in any secondary market (if any exists) at any
time. The internal funding rate used in the determination of the estimated value of the notes may differ from the market-implied funding
rate for vanilla fixed income instruments of a similar maturity issued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. Any difference may be
based on, among other things, our and our affiliates’ view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance, operational
and ongoing liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for the conventional fixed income instruments of
JPMorgan Chase & Co. This internal funding rate is based on certain market inputs and assumptions, which may prove to be incorrect,
and is intended to approximate the prevailing market replacement funding rate for the notes. The use of an internal funding rate and
any potential changes to that rate may have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and any secondary market prices of the notes.
For additional information, see “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of
the Notes — The Estimated Value of the Notes Is Derived by Reference to an Internal Funding Rate” in this pricing supplement.
The value of the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes is derived from internal pricing models of our
affiliates. These models are dependent on inputs such as the traded market prices of comparable derivative instruments and on various
other inputs, some of which are market-observable, and which can include volatility, dividend rates, interest rates and other factors, as
well as assumptions about future market events and/or environments. Accordingly, the estimated value of the notes is determined when
the terms of the notes are set based on market conditions and other relevant factors and assumptions existing at that time.

PS-13| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
The estimated value of the notes does not represent future values of the notes and may differ from others’ estimates. Different pricing
models and assumptions could provide valuations for the notes that are greater than or less than the estimated value of the notes. In
addition, market conditions and other relevant factors in the future may change, and any assumptions may prove to be incorrect. On
future dates, the value of the notes could change significantly based on, among other things, changes in market conditions, our or
JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s creditworthiness, interest rate movements and other relevant factors, which may impact the price, if any, at
which JPMS would be willing to buy notes from you in secondary market transactions.
The estimated value of the notes is lower than the original issue price of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring
and hedging the notes are included in the original issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions paid to JPMS
and other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, the projected profits, if any, that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in
hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes. Because hedging our
obligations entails risk and may be influenced by market forces beyond our control, this hedging may result in a profit that is more or
less than expected, or it may result in a loss. A portion of the profits, if any, realized in hedging our obligations under the notes may be
allowed to other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, and we or one or more of our affiliates will retain any remaining hedging profits. See
“Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — The Estimated
Value of the Notes Is Lower Than the Original Issue Price (Price to Public) of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
Secondary Market Prices of the Notes
For information about factors that will impact any secondary market prices of the notes, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to the
Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — Secondary market prices of the notes will be impacted by many
economic and market factors” in the accompanying product supplement. In addition, we generally expect that some of the costs
included in the original issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in connection with any repurchases of your notes by
JPMS in an amount that will decline to zero over an initial predetermined period. These costs can include selling commissions,
projected hedging profits, if any, and, in some circumstances, estimated hedging costs and our internal secondary market funding rates
for structured debt issuances. This initial predetermined time period is intended to be the shorter of six months and one-half of the
stated term of the notes. The length of any such initial period reflects the structure of the notes, whether our affiliates expect to earn a
profit in connection with our hedging activities, the estimated costs of hedging the notes and when these costs are incurred, as
determined by our affiliates. See “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices
of the Notes — The Value of the Notes as Published by JPMS (and Which May Be Reflected on Customer Account Statements) May
Be Higher Than the Then-Current Estimated Value of the Notes for a Limited Time Period” in this pricing supplement.
Supplemental Use of Proceeds
The notes are offered to meet investor demand for products that reflect the risk-return profile and market exposure provided by the
notes. See “How the Notes Work” and “Hypothetical Payout Examples” in this pricing supplement for an illustration of the risk-return
profile of the notes and “The MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index” in this pricing supplement for a description of the market
exposure provided by the notes.
The original issue price of the notes is equal to the estimated value of the notes plus the selling commissions paid to JPMS and other
affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, plus (minus) the projected profits (losses) that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent
in hedging our obligations under the notes, plus the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes.
Validity of the Notes and the Guarantee
In the opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as special products counsel to JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co., when the
notes offered by this pricing supplement have been issued by JPMorgan Financial pursuant to the indenture, the trustee and/or paying
agent has made, in accordance with the instructions from JPMorgan Financial, the appropriate entries or notations in its records relating
to the master global note that represents such notes (the “master note”), and such notes have been delivered against payment as
contemplated herein, such notes will be valid and binding obligations of JPMorgan Financial and the related guarantee will constitute a
valid and binding obligation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., enforceable in accordance with their terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, concepts of reasonableness and equitable principles of general
applicability (including, without limitation, concepts of good faith, fair dealing and the lack of bad faith), provided that such counsel
expresses no opinion as to (i) the effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer or similar provision of applicable law on the
conclusions expressed above or (ii) any provision of the indenture that purports to avoid the effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent
transfer or similar provision of applicable law by limiting the amount of JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s obligation under the related guarantee.
This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited to the laws of the State of New York, the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware and the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act. In addition, this opinion is subject to customary assumptions about the
trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the indenture and its authentication of the master note and the validity, binding nature
and enforceability of the indenture with respect to the trustee, all as stated in the letter of such counsel dated February 24, 2023, which
was filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 by JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co. on February 24,
2023.

PS-14| Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index
Additional Terms Specific to the Notes
You should read this pricing supplement together with the accompanying prospectus, as supplemented by the accompanying
prospectus supplement relating to our Series A medium-term notes of which these notes are a part, the accompanying prospectus
addendum and the more detailed information contained in the accompanying product supplement and the accompanying underlying
supplement. This pricing supplement, together with the documents listed below, contains the terms of the notes and supersedes all
other prior or contemporaneous oral statements as well as any other written materials including preliminary or indicative pricing terms,
correspondence, trade ideas, structures for implementation, sample structures, fact sheets, brochures or other educational materials of
ours. You should carefully consider, among other things, the matters set forth in the “Risk Factors” sections of the accompanying
prospectus supplement, the accompanying product supplement and the accompanying underlying supplement and in Annex A to the
accompanying prospectus addendum, as the notes involve risks not associated with conventional debt securities. We urge you to
consult your investment, legal, tax, accounting and other advisers before you invest in the notes.
You may access these documents on the SEC website at www.sec.gov as follows (or if such address has changed, by
reviewing our filings for the relevant date on the SEC website):
● Product supplement no. 4-I dated April 13, 2023:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000121390023029539/ea152803_424b2.pdf
● Underlying supplement no. 5-III dated March 5, 2025:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000121390025020799/ea0233342-01_424b2.pdf
● Prospectus supplement and prospectus, each dated April 13, 2023:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000095010323005751/crt_dp192097-424b2.pdf
● Prospectus addendum dated June 3, 2024:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1665650/000095010324007599/dp211753_424b3.htm
Our Central Index Key, or CIK, on the SEC website is 1665650, and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s CIK is 19617. As used in this pricing
supplement, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to JPMorgan Financial.

FAQ

What is JPMorgan Chase Financial (AMJB) offering in this 424B2 filing?

The company is issuing $1,150,000 of unsecured Review Notes linked to the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index, fully and unconditionally guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Each note has a $1,000 principal amount.

How do investors in these JPMorgan MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Notes get paid?

On each Review Date, if the Index is at or above the Call Value (100% of the Initial Value), the notes are automatically called and pay $1,000 plus a Call Premium Amount that starts at 15% of principal and steps up over time. If never called, the final payment depends on the Index level relative to the Initial Value and the 20.00% buffer.

What downside protection and loss risk do these AMJB-linked notes have?

The notes provide a 20.00% buffer at maturity: if the Final Value is down by up to 20.00%, investors receive full principal back. If the Index is down more than 20.00% and the notes are not called, the payoff is $1,000 + [$1,000 × (Index Return + 20.00%)], so investors can lose up to 80.00% of principal.

How do fees and estimated value compare to the price on these JPMorgan notes?

The price to public is $1,000 per note, including $44 in fees and commissions, with net proceeds of $956 per note to the issuer. The estimated value at pricing is $899.40 per $1,000 note, reflecting selling costs, hedging costs and the issuer’s internal funding rate.

What makes the MerQube US Tech+ Vol Advantage Index underlying these notes distinctive?

The Index provides rules-based exposure to the Invesco QQQ Trust with a target volatility of 35% and can use leverage up to 500%. Its level reflects a 6.0% per annum daily deduction and a daily notional financing cost over SOFR plus 0.50%, which generally causes the Index to trail an equivalent strategy without these charges.

What key risks does JPMorgan highlight for this MerQube-linked structured note?

Highlighted risks include potential loss of up to 80.00% of principal, lack of interest and dividends, credit risk of both JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co., index drag from the 6.0% deduction and financing cost, use of significant leverage in the Index, potential conflicts of interest, and that secondary market liquidity is not assured.