JPMorgan Chase Financial (AMJB) prices $841K review notes linked to indexes

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC is offering $841,000 of structured Review Notes linked to the least performing of the Russell 2000 Index, the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index and the Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund, maturing on December 6, 2030. The notes can be automatically called as early as December 7, 2026 if each underlying is at or above its Call Value, paying $1,000 plus a call premium that starts at 11.25% of principal and steps up to 56.25% on the final review date.

If the notes are not called, investors receive full principal at maturity only if the final value of each underlying is at least 70% of its initial level; otherwise, repayment is reduced one-for-one with the worst performer and can fall to zero. The notes pay no interest or dividends, are unsecured obligations of JPMorgan Chase Financial fully and unconditionally guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co., and are not bank deposits or FDIC insured. Each $1,000 note is sold at par, with $41.25 in selling commissions, net proceeds of $958.75 to the issuer and an estimated value at pricing of $926.80.

December 3, 2025 Registration Statement Nos. 333-270004 and 333-270004-01; Rule 424(b)(2)
Pricing supplement to product supplement no. 4-I dated April 13, 2023, underlying supplement no. 1-I dated April 13, 2023, the prospectus and
prospectus supplement, each dated April 13, 2023, and the prospectus addendum dated June 3, 2024
JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC
Structured Investments
$841,000
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the
Russell 2000® Index, the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector
IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector SPDR® Fund due
December 6, 2030
Fully and Unconditionally Guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co.
• The notes are designed for investors who seek early exit prior to maturity at a premium if, on any Review Date, the
closing value of each of the Russell 2000® Index, the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select
Sector SPDR® Fund, which we refer to as the Underlyings, is at or above its Call Value.
• The earliest date on which an automatic call may be initiated is December 7, 2026.
• Investors should be willing to forgo interest and dividend payments and be willing to accept the risk of losing a significant
portion or all of their principal amount at maturity.
• The notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, which we refer to
as JPMorgan Financial, the payment on which is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Any
payment on the notes is subject to the credit risk of JPMorgan Financial, as issuer of the notes, and the credit
risk of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as guarantor of the notes.
• Payments on the notes are not linked to a basket composed of the Underlyings. Payments on the notes are linked to the
performance of each of the Underlyings individually, as described below.
• Minimum denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof
• The notes priced on December 3, 2025 and are expected to settle on or about December 8, 2025.
• CUSIP: 48136LXL8
Investing in the notes involves a number of risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page S-2 of the accompanying
prospectus supplement, Annex A to the accompanying prospectus addendum, “Risk Factors” beginning on page PS-11
of the accompanying product supplement and “Selected Risk Considerations” beginning on page PS-6 of this pricing
supplement.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved
of the notes or passed upon the accuracy or the adequacy of this pricing supplement or the accompanying product supplement,
underlying supplement, prospectus supplement, prospectus and prospectus addendum. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
Price to Public (1)
Fees and Commissions (2)
Proceeds to Issuer
Per note
$1,000
$41.25
$958.75
Total
$841,000
$34,691.25
$806,308.75
(1) See “Supplemental Use of Proceeds” in this pricing supplement for information about the components of the price to public of the
notes.
(2) J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, which we refer to as JPMS, acting as agent for JPMorgan Financial, will pay all of the selling
commissions of $41.25 per $1,000 principal amount note it receives from us to other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers. See “Plan of
Distribution (Conflicts of Interest)” in the accompanying product supplement.
The estimated value of the notes, when the terms of the notes were set, was $926.80 per $1,000 principal amount note.
See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement for additional information.
The notes are not bank deposits, are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency
and are not obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank.

PS-1 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
Key Terms
Review Dates*: December 7, 2026, January 4, 2027, February
3, 2027, March 3, 2027, April 5, 2027, May 3, 2027, June 3,
2027, July 6, 2027, August 3, 2027, September 3, 2027,
October 4, 2027, November 3, 2027, December 3, 2027,
January 3, 2028, February 3, 2028, March 3, 2028, April 3,
2028, May 3, 2028, June 5, 2028, July 3, 2028, August 3, 2028,
September 5, 2028, October 3, 2028, November 3, 2028,
December 4, 2028, January 3, 2029, February 5, 2029, March
5, 2029, April 3, 2029, May 3, 2029, June 4, 2029, July 3, 2029,
August 3, 2029, September 4, 2029, October 3, 2029,
November 5, 2029, December 3, 2029, January 3, 2030,
February 4, 2030, March 4, 2030, April 3, 2030, May 3, 2030,
June 3, 2030, July 3, 2030, August 5, 2030, September 3, 2030,
October 3, 2030, November 4, 2030 and December 3, 2030
(final Review Date)
Call Settlement Dates*: December 10, 2026, January 7, 2027,
February 8, 2027, March 8, 2027, April 8, 2027, May 6, 2027,
June 8, 2027, July 9, 2027, August 6, 2027, September 9, 2027,
October 7, 2027, November 8, 2027, December 8, 2027,
January 6, 2028, February 8, 2028, March 8, 2028, April 6,
2028, May 8, 2028, June 8, 2028, July 7, 2028, August 8, 2028,
September 8, 2028, October 6, 2028, November 8, 2028,
December 7, 2028, January 8, 2029, February 8, 2029, March
8, 2029, April 6, 2029, May 8, 2029, June 7, 2029, July 9, 2029,
August 8, 2029, September 7, 2029, October 9, 2029,
November 8, 2029, December 6, 2029, January 8, 2030,
February 7, 2030, March 7, 2030, April 8, 2030, May 8, 2030,
June 6, 2030, July 9, 2030, August 8, 2030, September 6, 2030,
October 8, 2030, November 7, 2030 and the Maturity Date
Maturity Date*: December 6, 2030
Automatic Call:
If the closing value of each Underlying on any Review Date is
greater than or equal to its Call Value, the notes will be
automatically called for a cash payment, for each $1,000
principal amount note, equal to (a) $1,000 plus (b) the Call
Premium Amount applicable to that Review Date, payable on
the applicable Call Settlement Date. No further payments will
be made on the notes.
Payment at Maturity:
If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final
Value of each Underlying is greater than or equal to its Barrier
Amount, you will receive the principal amount of your notes at
maturity.
If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final
Value of any Underlying is less than its Barrier Amount, your
payment at maturity per $1,000 principal amount note will be
calculated as follows:
$1,000 + ($1,000 × Least Performing Underlying Return)
If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final
Value of any Underlying is less than its Barrier Amount, you will
lose more than 30.00% of your principal amount at maturity and
could lose all of your principal amount at maturity.
Least Performing Underlying: The Underlying with the Least
Performing Underlying Return
Least Performing Underlying Return: The lowest of the
Underlying Returns of the Underlyings
Underlying Return: With respect to each Underlying,
(Final Value – Initial Value)
Initial Value
Initial Value: With respect to each Underlying, the closing value
of that Underlying on the Pricing Date, which was 2,512.136 for
the Russell 2000® Index, 12,979.56 for the Nasdaq-100®
Technology Sector IndexSM and $87.60 for the Fund
Final Value: With respect to each Underlying, the closing value
of that Underlying on the final Review Date
Share Adjustment Factor: The Share Adjustment Factor is
referenced in determining the closing value of the Fund and is
set equal to 1.0 on the Pricing Date. The Share Adjustment
Factor is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain
events affecting the Fund. See “The Underlyings — Funds —
Anti-Dilution Adjustments” in the accompanying product
supplement for further information.
* Subject to postponement in the event of a market disruption event and
as described under “General Terms of Notes — Postponement of a
Determination Date — Notes Linked to Multiple Underlyings” and
“General Terms of Notes — Postponement of a Payment Date” in the
accompanying product supplement
Issuer: JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, a direct, wholly
owned finance subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Guarantor: JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Underlyings: The Russell 2000® Index (Bloomberg ticker:
RTY) and the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM
(Bloomberg ticker: NDXT) (each of the Russell 2000®
Index and the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM,
an “Index” and collectively, the “Indices”) and the Utilities
Select Sector SPDR® Fund (Bloomberg ticker: XLU) (the
“Fund”) (each of the Indices and the Fund, an
“Underlying” and collectively, the “Underlyings”)
Call Premium Amount: The Call Premium Amount with
respect to each Review Date is set forth below:
• first Review Date:
11.2500% × $1,000
• second Review Date:
12.1875% × $1,000
• third Review Date:
13.1250% × $1,000
• fourth Review Date:
14.0625% × $1,000
• fifth Review Date:
15.0000% × $1,000
• sixth Review Date:
15.9375% × $1,000
• seventh Review Date:
16.8750% × $1,000
• eighth Review Date:
17.8125% × $1,000
• ninth Review Date:
18.7500% × $1,000
• tenth Review Date:
19.6875% × $1,000
• eleventh Review Date:
20.6250% × $1,000
• twelfth Review Date:
21.5625% × $1,000
• thirteenth Review Date:
22.5000% × $1,000
• fourteenth Review Date:
23.4375% × $1,000
• fifteenth Review Date:
24.3750% × $1,000
• sixteenth Review Date:
25.3125% × $1,000
• seventeenth Review Date:
26.2500% × $1,000
• eighteenth Review Date:
27.1875% × $1,000
• nineteenth Review Date:
28.1250% × $1,000
• twentieth Review Date:
29.0625% × $1,000
• twenty-first Review Date:
30.0000% × $1,000
• twenty-second Review Date:
30.9375% × $1,000
• twenty-third Review Date:
31.8750% × $1,000
• twenty-fourth Review Date:
32.8125% × $1,000
• twenty-fifth Review Date:
33.7500% × $1,000
• twenty-sixth Review Date:
34.6875% × $1,000
• twenty-seventh Review Date:
35.6250% × $1,000
• twenty-eighth Review Date:
36.5625% × $1,000
• twenty-ninth Review Date:
37.5000% × $1,000
• thirtieth Review Date:
38.4375% × $1,000
• thirty-first Review Date:
39.3750% × $1,000
• thirty-second Review Date:
40.3125% × $1,000
• thirty-third Review Date:
41.2500% × $1,000
• thirty-fourth Review Date:
42.1875% × $1,000
• thirty-fifth Review Date:
43.1250% × $1,000
• thirty-sixth Review Date:
44.0625% × $1,000
• thirty-seventh Review Date:
45.0000% × $1,000
• thirty-eighth Review Date:
45.9375% × $1,000
• thirty-ninth Review Date:
46.8750% × $1,000
• fortieth Review Date:
47.8125% × $1,000
• forty-first Review Date:
48.7500% × $1,000
• forty-second Review Date:
49.6875% × $1,000
• forty-third Review Date:
50.6250% × $1,000
• forty-fourth Review Date:
51.5625% × $1,000
• forty-fifth Review Date:
52.5000% × $1,000
• forty-sixth Review Date:
53.4375% × $1,000
• forty-seventh Review Date:
54.3750% × $1,000
• forty-eighth Review Date:
55.3125% × $1,000
• final Review Date:
56.2500% × $1,000
Call Value: With respect to each Underlying, 100.00% of its
Initial Value
Barrier Amount: With respect to each Underlying, 70.00% of
its Initial Value, which is 1,758.4952 for the Russell 2000®
Index, 9,085.692 for the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector
IndexSM and $61.32 for the Fund
Pricing Date: December 3, 2025
Original Issue Date (Settlement Date): On or about
December 8, 2025

PS-2 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
Supplemental Terms of the Notes
Any values of the Underlyings, and any values derived therefrom, included in this pricing supplement may be corrected, in the event of
manifest error or inconsistency, by amendment of this pricing supplement and the corresponding terms of the notes. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in the indenture governing the notes, that amendment will become effective without consent of the holders of
the notes or any other party.
How the Notes Work
Payment upon an Automatic Call
Payment at Maturity If the Notes Have Not Been Automatically Called
The notes will be automatically called on the applicable Call Settlement Date and you will
receive (a) $1,000 plus (b) the Call Premium Amount applicable to that Review Date.
No further payments will be made on the notes.
Compare the closing value of each Underlying to its Call Value on each Review Date until any earlier automatic call.
Review Dates
Automatic Call
The closing value of
each Underlying is
greater than or equal to
its Call Value.
The closing value of any
Underlying is less than
its Call Value.
Call
Value
The notes will not be automatically called. Proceed to the next Review Date, if any.
No Automatic Call
Review Dates
You will receive the principal amount
of your notes.
The notes have not
been automatically
called. Proceed to the
payment at maturity.
Final Review Date Payment at Maturity
You will receive:
$1,000 + ($1,000 ×Least Performing
Underlying Return)
Under these circumstances, you will
lose a significant portion or all of your
principal amount at maturity.
The Final Value of each Underlying is greater
than or equal to its Barrier Amount.
The Final Value of any Underlying is less than
its Barrier Amount.

PS-3 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
Call Premium Amount
The table below illustrates the Call Premium Amount per $1,000 principal amount note for each Review Date based on the Call
Premium Amounts set forth under “Key Terms — Call Premium Amount” above.
Review Date
Call Premium Amount
First
$112.500
Second
$121.875
Third
$131.250
Fourth
$140.625
Fifth
$150.000
Sixth
$159.375
Seventh
$168.750
Eighth
$178.125
Ninth
$187.500
Tenth
$196.875
Eleventh
$206.250
Twelfth
$215.625
Thirteenth
$225.000
Fourteenth
$234.375
Fifteenth
$243.750
Sixteenth
$253.125
Seventeenth
$262.500
Eighteenth
$271.875
Nineteenth
$281.250
Twentieth
$290.625
Twenty-First
$300.000
Twenty-Second
$309.375
Twenty-Third
$318.750
Twenty-Fourth
$328.125
Twenty-Fifth
$337.500
Twenty-Sixth
$346.875
Twenty-Seventh
$356.250
Twenty-Eighth
$365.625
Twenty-Ninth
$375.000
Thirtieth
$384.375
Thirty-First
$393.750
Thirty-Second
$403.125

PS-4 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
Review Date
Call Premium Amount
Thirty-Third
$412.500
Thirty-Fourth
$421.875
Thirty-Fifth
$431.250
Thirty-Sixth
$440.625
Thirty-Seventh
$450.000
Thirty-Eighth
$459.375
Thirty-Ninth
$468.750
Fortieth
$478.125
Forty-First
$487.500
Forty-Second
$496.875
Forty-Third
$506.250
Forty-Fourth
$515.625
Forty-Fifth
$525.000
Forty-Sixth
$534.375
Forty-Seventh
$543.750
Forty-Eighth
$553.125
Final
$562.500
Hypothetical Payout Examples
The following examples illustrate payments on the notes linked to three hypothetical Underlyings, assuming a range of performances
for the hypothetical Least Performing Underlying on the Review Dates. Solely for purposes of this section, the Least Performing
Underlying with respect to each Review Date is the least performing of the Underlyings determined based on the closing
value of each Underlying on that Review Date compared with its Initial Value.
The hypothetical payments set forth below assume the following:
• an Initial Value for each Underlying of 100.00;
• a Call Value for each Underlying of 100.00 (equal to 100.00% of its hypothetical Initial Value);
• a Barrier Amount for each Underlying of 70.00 (equal to 70.00% of its hypothetical Initial Value); and
• the Call Premium Amounts set forth under “Key Terms — Call Premium Amount” above.
The hypothetical Initial Value of each Underlying of 100.00 has been chosen for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the
actual Initial Value of any Underlying. The actual Initial Value of each Underlying is the closing value of that Underlying on the Pricing
Date and is specified under “Key Terms — Initial Value” in this pricing supplement. For historical data regarding the actual closing
values of each Underlying, please see the historical information set forth under “The Underlyings” in this pricing supplement.
Each hypothetical payment set forth below is for illustrative purposes only and may not be the actual payment applicable to a purchaser
of the notes. The numbers appearing in the following examples have been rounded for ease of analysis.

PS-5 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
Example 1 — Notes are automatically called on the first Review Date.
Date
Closing Value of Least
Performing Underlying
First Review Date
105.00
Notes are automatically called
Total Payment
$1,112.50 (11.25% return)
Because the closing value of each Underlying on the first Review Date is greater than or equal to its Call Value, the notes will be
automatically called for a cash payment, for each $1,000 principal amount note, of $1,112.50 (or $1,000 plus the Call Premium Amount
applicable to the first Review Date), payable on the applicable Call Settlement Date. No further payments will be made on the notes.
Example 2 — Notes are automatically called on the final Review Date.
Date
Closing Value of Least
Performing Underlying
First Review Date
90.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Second Review Date
75.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Third through Forty-Eighth
Review Dates
Less than Call Value
Notes NOT automatically called
Final Review Date
180.00
Notes are automatically called
Total Payment
$1,562.50 (56.25% return)
Because the closing value of each Underlying on the final Review Date is greater than or equal to its Call Value, the notes will be
automatically called for a cash payment, for each $1,000 principal amount note, of $1,562.50 (or $1,000 plus the Call Premium Amount
applicable to the final Review Date), payable on the applicable Call Settlement Date, which is the Maturity Date.
Example 3 — Notes have NOT been automatically called and the Final Value of the Least Performing Underlying is greater
than or equal to its Barrier Amount.
Date
Closing Value of Least
Performing Underlying
First Review Date
80.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Second Review Date
75.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Third through Forty-Eighth
Review Dates
Less than Call Value
Notes NOT automatically called
Final Review Date
70.00
Notes NOT automatically called; Final Value of Least Performing
Underlying is greater than or equal to Barrier Amount
Total Payment
$1,000.00 (0.00% return)
Because the notes have not been automatically called and the Final Value of the Least Performing Underlying is greater than or equal
to its Barrier Amount, the payment at maturity, for each $1,000 principal amount note, will be $1,000.00.

PS-6 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
Example 4 — Notes have NOT been automatically called and the Final Value of the Least Performing Underlying is less than
its Barrier Amount.
Date
Closing Value of Least
Performing Underlying
First Review Date
60.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Second Review Date
70.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Third through Forty-Eighth
Review Dates
Less than Call Value
Notes NOT automatically called
Final Review Date
40.00
Notes NOT automatically called; Final Value of Least Performing
Underlying is less than Barrier Amount
Total Payment
$400.00 (-60.00% return)
Because the notes have not been automatically called, the Final Value of the Least Performing Underlying is less than its Barrier
Amount and the Least Performing Underlying Return is -60.00%, the payment at maturity will be $400.00 per $1,000 principal amount
note, calculated as follows:
$1,000 + [$1,000 × (-60.00%)] = $400.00
The hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments on the notes shown above apply only if you hold the notes for their entire term
or until automatically called. These hypotheticals do not reflect the fees or expenses that would be associated with any sale in the
secondary market. If these fees and expenses were included, the hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments shown above would
likely be lower.
Selected Risk Considerations
An investment in the notes involves significant risks. These risks are explained in more detail in the “Risk Factors” sections of the
accompanying prospectus supplement and product supplement and in Annex A to the accompanying prospectus addendum.
Risks Relating to the Notes Generally
• YOUR INVESTMENT IN THE NOTES MAY RESULT IN A LOSS —
The notes do not guarantee any return of principal. If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final Value of any
Underlying is less than its Barrier Amount, you will lose 1% of the principal amount of your notes for every 1% that the Final Value
of the Least Performing Underlying is less than its Initial Value. Accordingly, under these circumstances, you will lose more than
30.00% of your principal amount at maturity and could lose all of your principal amount at maturity.
• CREDIT RISKS OF JPMORGAN FINANCIAL AND JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. —
Investors are dependent on our and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s ability to pay all amounts due on the notes. Any actual or potential
change in our or JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s creditworthiness or credit spreads, as determined by the market for taking that credit
risk, is likely to adversely affect the value of the notes. If we and JPMorgan Chase & Co. were to default on our payment
obligations, you may not receive any amounts owed to you under the notes and you could lose your entire investment.
• AS A FINANCE SUBSIDIARY, JPMORGAN FINANCIAL HAS NO INDEPENDENT OPERATIONS AND HAS LIMITED ASSETS
—
As a finance subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co., we have no independent operations beyond the issuance and administration of
our securities and the collection of intercompany obligations. Aside from the initial capital contribution from JPMorgan Chase &
Co., substantially all of our assets relate to obligations of JPMorgan Chase & Co. to make payments under loans made by us to
JPMorgan Chase & Co. or under other intercompany agreements. As a result, we are dependent upon payments from JPMorgan
Chase & Co. to meet our obligations under the notes. We are not a key operating subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and in a
bankruptcy or resolution of JPMorgan Chase & Co. we are not expected to have sufficient resources to meet our obligations in
respect of the notes as they come due. If JPMorgan Chase & Co. does not make payments to us and we are unable to make
payments on the notes, you may have to seek payment under the related guarantee by JPMorgan Chase & Co., and that
guarantee will rank pari passu with all other unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of JPMorgan Chase & Co. For more
information, see the accompanying prospectus addendum.

PS-7 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
• THE APPRECIATION POTENTIAL OF THE NOTES IS LIMITED TO ANY CALL PREMIUM AMOUNT PAID ON THE NOTES,
regardless of any appreciation of any Underlying, which may be significant. You will not participate in any appreciation of any
Underlying.
• YOU ARE EXPOSED TO THE RISK OF DECLINE IN THE VALUE OF EACH UNDERLYING —
Payments on the notes are not linked to a basket composed of the Underlyings and are contingent upon the performance of each
individual Underlying. Poor performance by any of the Underlyings over the term of the notes may result in the notes not being
automatically called on a Review Date, may negatively affect your payment at maturity and will not be offset or mitigated by
positive performance by any other Underlying.
• YOUR PAYMENT AT MATURITY WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE LEAST PERFORMING UNDERLYING.
• THE BENEFIT PROVIDED BY THE BARRIER AMOUNT MAY TERMINATE ON THE FINAL REVIEW DATE —
If the Final Value of any Underlying is less than its Barrier Amount and the notes have not been automatically called, the benefit
provided by the Barrier Amount will terminate and you will be fully exposed to any depreciation of the Least Performing Underlying.
• THE AUTOMATIC CALL FEATURE MAY FORCE A POTENTIAL EARLY EXIT —
If your notes are automatically called, the term of the notes may be reduced to as short as approximately one year. There is no
guarantee that you would be able to reinvest the proceeds from an investment in the notes at a comparable return for a similar
level of risk. Even in cases where the notes are called before maturity, you are not entitled to any fees and commissions described
on the front cover of this pricing supplement.
• THE NOTES DO NOT PAY INTEREST.
• YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE DIVIDENDS ON THE FUND OR THE SECURITIES INCLUDED IN OR HELD BY ANY UNDERLYING
OR HAVE ANY RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO THE FUND OR THOSE SECURITIES.
• THE RISK OF THE CLOSING VALUE OF AN UNDERLYING FALLING BELOW ITS BARRIER AMOUNT IS GREATER IF THE
VALUE OF THAT UNDERLYING IS VOLATILE.
• LACK OF LIQUIDITY —
The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange. Accordingly, the price at which you may be able to trade your notes is
likely to depend on the price, if any, at which JPMS is willing to buy the notes. You may not be able to sell your notes. The notes
are not designed to be short-term trading instruments. Accordingly, you should be able and willing to hold your notes to maturity.
Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest
• POTENTIAL CONFLICTS —
We and our affiliates play a variety of roles in connection with the notes. In performing these duties, our and JPMorgan Chase &
Co.’s economic interests are potentially adverse to your interests as an investor in the notes. It is possible that hedging or trading
activities of ours or our affiliates in connection with the notes could result in substantial returns for us or our affiliates while the
value of the notes declines. Please refer to “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest” in the accompanying product
supplement.
Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes
• THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES IS LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL ISSUE PRICE (PRICE TO PUBLIC) OF THE
NOTES —
The estimated value of the notes is only an estimate determined by reference to several factors. The original issue price of the
notes exceeds the estimated value of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring and hedging the notes are
included in the original issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions, the projected profits, if any, that our
affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimated cost of hedging
our obligations under the notes. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
• THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES DOES NOT REPRESENT FUTURE VALUES OF THE NOTES AND MAY DIFFER
FROM OTHERS’ ESTIMATES —
See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.

PS-8 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
• THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES IS DERIVED BY REFERENCE TO AN INTERNAL FUNDING RATE —
The internal funding rate used in the determination of the estimated value of the notes may differ from the market-implied funding
rate for vanilla fixed income instruments of a similar maturity issued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. Any difference may
be based on, among other things, our and our affiliates’ view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance,
operational and ongoing liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for the conventional fixed income
instruments of JPMorgan Chase & Co. This internal funding rate is based on certain market inputs and assumptions, which may
prove to be incorrect, and is intended to approximate the prevailing market replacement funding rate for the notes. The use of an
internal funding rate and any potential changes to that rate may have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and any
secondary market prices of the notes. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
• THE VALUE OF THE NOTES AS PUBLISHED BY JPMS (AND WHICH MAY BE REFLECTED ON CUSTOMER ACCOUNT
STATEMENTS) MAY BE HIGHER THAN THE THEN-CURRENT ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES FOR A LIMITED TIME
PERIOD —
We generally expect that some of the costs included in the original issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in
connection with any repurchases of your notes by JPMS in an amount that will decline to zero over an initial predetermined period.
See “Secondary Market Prices of the Notes” in this pricing supplement for additional information relating to this initial period.
Accordingly, the estimated value of your notes during this initial period may be lower than the value of the notes as published by
JPMS (and which may be shown on your customer account statements).
• SECONDARY MARKET PRICES OF THE NOTES WILL LIKELY BE LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL ISSUE PRICE OF THE
NOTES —
Any secondary market prices of the notes will likely be lower than the original issue price of the notes because, among other
things, secondary market prices take into account our internal secondary market funding rates for structured debt issuances and,
also, because secondary market prices may exclude selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if any, and estimated hedging
costs that are included in the original issue price of the notes. As a result, the price, if any, at which JPMS will be willing to buy the
notes from you in secondary market transactions, if at all, is likely to be lower than the original issue price. Any sale by you prior to
the Maturity Date could result in a substantial loss to you.
• SECONDARY MARKET PRICES OF THE NOTES WILL BE IMPACTED BY MANY ECONOMIC AND MARKET FACTORS —
The secondary market price of the notes during their term will be impacted by a number of economic and market factors, which
may either offset or magnify each other, aside from the selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if any, estimated hedging
costs and the values of the Underlyings. Additionally, independent pricing vendors and/or third party broker-dealers may publish a
price for the notes, which may also be reflected on customer account statements. This price may be different (higher or lower)
than the price of the notes, if any, at which JPMS may be willing to purchase your notes in the secondary market. See “Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — Secondary market prices of the
notes will be impacted by many economic and market factors” in the accompanying product supplement.
Risks Relating to the Underlyings
• AN INVESTMENT IN THE NOTES IS SUBJECT TO RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH SMALL CAPITALIZATION STOCKS WITH
RESPECT TO THE RUSSELL 2000® INDEX —
Small capitalization companies may be less able to withstand adverse economic, market, trade and competitive conditions relative
to larger companies. Small capitalization companies are less likely to pay dividends on their stocks, and the presence of a
dividend payment could be a factor that limits downward stock price pressure under adverse market conditions.
• RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TECHNOLOGY SECTOR WITH RESPECT TO THE NASDAQ-100® TECHNOLOGY SECTOR
INDEXSM —
All or substantially all of the equity securities included in the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM are issued by companies
whose primary line of business is directly associated with the technology sector. As a result, the value of the notes may be subject
to greater volatility and be more adversely affected by a single economic, political or regulatory occurrence affecting this sector
than a different investment linked to securities of a more broadly diversified group of issuers. The value of stocks of technology
companies and companies that rely heavily on technology is particularly vulnerable to rapid changes in technology product cycles,
rapid product obsolescence, government regulation and competition, both domestically and internationally, including competition
from foreign competitors with lower production costs. Stocks of technology companies and companies that rely heavily on
technology, especially those of smaller, less-seasoned companies, tend to be more volatile than the overall market. Technology

PS-9 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
companies are heavily dependent on patent and intellectual property rights, the loss or impairment of which may adversely affect
profitability. Additionally, companies in the technology sector may face dramatic and often unpredictable changes in growth rates
and competition for the services of qualified personnel. These factors could affect the technology sector and could affect the value
of the equity securities included in the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the level of the Nasdaq-100® Technology
Sector IndexSM during the term of the notes, which may adversely affect the value of your notes.
• NON-U.S. SECURITIES RISK WITH RESPECT TO THE NASDAQ-100® TECHNOLOGY SECTOR INDEXSM —
Some of the equity securities included in the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM have been issued by non-U.S. companies.
Investments in securities linked to the value of such non-U.S. equity securities involve risks associated with the home countries of
the issuers of those non-U.S. equity securities.
• THERE ARE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND —
The Fund is subject to management risk, which is the risk that the investment strategies of the Fund’s investment adviser, the
implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. These constraints could
adversely affect the market price of the shares of the Fund and, consequently, the value of the notes.
• THE PERFORMANCE AND MARKET VALUE OF THE FUND, PARTICULARLY DURING PERIODS OF MARKET VOLATILITY,
MAY NOT CORRELATE WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND’S UNDERLYING INDEX AS WELL AS THE NET ASSET
VALUE PER SHARE —
The Fund does not fully replicate its Underlying Index (as defined under “The Underlyings” below) and may hold securities different
from those included in its Underlying Index. In addition, the performance of the Fund will reflect additional transaction costs and
fees that are not included in the calculation of its Underlying Index. All of these factors may lead to a lack of correlation between
the performance of the Fund and its Underlying Index. In addition, corporate actions with respect to the equity securities
underlying the Fund (such as mergers and spin-offs) may impact the variance between the performances of the Fund and its
Underlying Index. Finally, because the shares of the Fund are traded on a securities exchange and are subject to market supply
and investor demand, the market value of one share of the Fund may differ from the net asset value per share of the Fund.
During periods of market volatility, securities underlying the Fund may be unavailable in the secondary market, market participants
may be unable to calculate accurately the net asset value per share of the Fund and the liquidity of the Fund may be adversely
affected. This kind of market volatility may also disrupt the ability of market participants to create and redeem shares of the Fund.
Further, market volatility may adversely affect, sometimes materially, the prices at which market participants are willing to buy and
sell shares of the Fund. As a result, under these circumstances, the market value of shares of the Fund may vary substantially
from the net asset value per share of the Fund. For all of the foregoing reasons, the performance of the Fund may not correlate
with the performance of its Underlying Index as well as the net asset value per share of the Fund, which could materially and
adversely affect the value of the notes in the secondary market and/or reduce any payment on the notes.
• RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE UTILITIES SECTOR WITH RESPECT TO THE FUND —
All or substantially all of the equity securities held by the Fund are issued by companies whose primary line of business is directly
associated with the utilities sector. As a result, the value of the notes may be subject to greater volatility and be more adversely
affected by a single economic, political or regulatory occurrence affecting this sector than a different investment linked to securities
of a more broadly diversified group of issuers. Utility companies are affected by supply and demand, operating costs, government
regulation, environmental factors, liabilities for environmental damage and general civil liabilities and rate caps or rate changes.
Although rate changes of a regulated utility usually fluctuate in approximate correlation with financing costs, due to political and
regulatory factors, rate changes ordinarily occur only following a delay after the changes in financing costs. This factor will tend to
favorably affect a regulated utility company’s earnings and dividends in times of decreasing costs, but conversely, will tend to
adversely affect earnings and dividends when costs are rising. The value of regulated utility equity securities may tend to have an
inverse relationship to the movement of interest rates. Certain utility companies have experienced full or partial deregulation in
recent years. These utility companies are frequently more similar to industrial companies in that they are subject to greater
competition and have been permitted by regulators to diversify outside of their original geographic regions and their traditional lines
of business. These opportunities may permit certain utility companies to earn more than their traditional regulated rates of return.
Some companies, however, may be forced to defend their core business and may be less profitable. In addition, natural disasters,
terrorist attacks, government intervention or other factors may render a utility company’s equipment unusable or obsolete and
negatively impact profitability. Among the risks that may affect utility companies are the following: risks of increases in fuel and
other operating costs; the high cost of borrowing to finance capital construction during inflationary periods; restrictions on
operations and increased costs and delays associated with compliance with environmental and nuclear safety regulations; and the

PS-10 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
difficulties involved in obtaining natural gas for resale or fuel for generating electricity at reasonable prices. Other risks include
those related to the construction and operation of nuclear power plants, the effects of energy conservation and the effects of
regulatory changes. These factors could affect the utilities sector and could affect the value of the equity securities held by the
Fund and the price of the Fund during the term of the notes, which may adversely affect the value of your notes.
• THE ANTI-DILUTION PROTECTION FOR THE FUND IS LIMITED —
The calculation agent will make adjustments to the Share Adjustment Factor for certain events affecting the shares of the Fund.
However, the calculation agent will not make an adjustment in response to all events that could affect the shares of the Fund. If an
event occurs that does not require the calculation agent to make an adjustment, the value of the notes may be materially and
adversely affected.

PS-11 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
The Underlyings
The Russell 2000® Index consists of the middle 2,000 companies included in the Russell 3000E™ Index and, as a result of the index
calculation methodology, consists of the smallest 2,000 companies included in the Russell 3000® Index. The Russell 2000® Index is
designed to track the performance of the small capitalization segment of the U.S. equity market. For additional information about the
Russell 2000® Index, see “Equity Index Descriptions — The Russell Indices” in the accompanying underlying supplement.
The Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM is an equal-weighted, price-return index designed to measure the performance of the
technology companies in the Nasdaq-100 Index®. For additional information about the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM, see
“Annex A” in this pricing supplement.
The Fund is an exchange-traded fund of the Select Sector SPDR® Trust, a registered investment company, that seeks to provide
investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of publicly traded equity securities of
companies in the Utilities Select Sector Index, which we refer to as the Underlying Index with respect to the Fund. The Utilities Select
Sector Index is a capped modified market capitalization-based index that measures the performance of the GICS® utilities sector of the
S&P 500® Index, which currently includes companies in the following industries: electric utilities; water utilities; multi-utilities;
independent power and renewable electricity producers; and gas utilities. For additional information about the Fund, see “Fund
Descriptions — The Select Sector SPDR® Funds” in the accompanying underlying supplement.
Historical Information
The following graphs set forth the historical performance of each Underlying based on the weekly historical closing values from January
3, 2020 through November 28, 2025. The closing value of the Russell 2000® Index on December 3, 2025 was 2,512.136. The closing
value of the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM on December 3, 2025 was 12,979.56. The closing value of the Fund on
December 3, 2025 was $87.60. We obtained the closing values above and below from the Bloomberg Professional® service
(“Bloomberg”), without independent verification. The closing values of the Fund above and below may have been adjusted by
Bloomberg for actions taken by the Fund, such as stock splits.
The historical closing values of each Underlying should not be taken as an indication of future performance, and no assurance can be
given as to the closing value of any Underlying on any Review Date. There can be no assurance that the performance of the
Underlyings will result in the return of any of your principal amount.

PS-12 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
Tax Treatment
You should review carefully the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in the accompanying product
supplement no. 4-I. The following discussion, when read in combination with that section, constitutes the full opinion of our special tax
counsel, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, regarding the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and disposing of notes.
Based on current market conditions, in the opinion of our special tax counsel it is reasonable to treat the notes as “open transactions”
that are not debt instruments for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as more fully described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences — Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders — Notes Treated as Open Transactions That Are Not Debt Instruments” in the
accompanying product supplement. Assuming this treatment is respected, the gain or loss on your notes should be treated as long-
term capital gain or loss if you hold your notes for more than a year, whether or not you are an initial purchaser of notes at the issue
price. However, the IRS or a court may not respect this treatment, in which case the timing and character of any income or loss on the
notes could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, in 2007 Treasury and the IRS released a notice requesting comments on
the U.S. federal income tax treatment of “prepaid forward contracts” and similar instruments. The notice focuses in particular on
whether to require investors in these instruments to accrue income over the term of their investment. It also asks for comments on a
number of related topics, including the character of income or loss with respect to these instruments; the relevance of factors such as
the nature of the underlying property to which the instruments are linked; the degree, if any, to which income (including any mandated
accruals) realized by non-U.S. investors should be subject to withholding tax; and whether these instruments are or should be subject

PS-13 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
to the “constructive ownership” regime, which very generally can operate to recharacterize certain long-term capital gain as ordinary
income and impose a notional interest charge. While the notice requests comments on appropriate transition rules and effective dates,
any Treasury regulations or other guidance promulgated after consideration of these issues could materially and adversely affect the
tax consequences of an investment in the notes, possibly with retroactive effect. You should consult your tax adviser regarding the
U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the notes, including possible alternative treatments and the issues presented
by this notice.
Section 871(m) of the Code and Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder (“Section 871(m)”) generally impose a 30% withholding
tax (unless an income tax treaty applies) on dividend equivalents paid or deemed paid to Non-U.S. Holders with respect to certain
financial instruments linked to U.S. equities or indices that include U.S. equities. Section 871(m) provides certain exceptions to this
withholding regime, including for instruments linked to certain broad-based indices that meet requirements set forth in the applicable
Treasury regulations. Additionally, a recent IRS notice excludes from the scope of Section 871(m) instruments issued prior to January
1, 2027 that do not have a delta of one with respect to underlying securities that could pay U.S.-source dividends for U.S. federal
income tax purposes (each an “Underlying Security”). Based on certain determinations made by us, our special tax counsel is of the
opinion that Section 871(m) should not apply to the notes with regard to Non-U.S. Holders. Our determination is not binding on the
IRS, and the IRS may disagree with this determination. Section 871(m) is complex and its application may depend on your particular
circumstances, including whether you enter into other transactions with respect to an Underlying Security. You should consult your tax
adviser regarding the potential application of Section 871(m) to the notes.
The Estimated Value of the Notes
The estimated value of the notes set forth on the cover of this pricing supplement is equal to the sum of the values of the following
hypothetical components: (1) a fixed-income debt component with the same maturity as the notes, valued using the internal funding
rate described below, and (2) the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes. The estimated value of the
notes does not represent a minimum price at which JPMS would be willing to buy your notes in any secondary market (if any exists) at
any time. The internal funding rate used in the determination of the estimated value of the notes may differ from the market-implied
funding rate for vanilla fixed income instruments of a similar maturity issued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. Any difference
may be based on, among other things, our and our affiliates’ view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance,
operational and ongoing liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for the conventional fixed income
instruments of JPMorgan Chase & Co. This internal funding rate is based on certain market inputs and assumptions, which may prove
to be incorrect, and is intended to approximate the prevailing market replacement funding rate for the notes. The use of an internal
funding rate and any potential changes to that rate may have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and any secondary market
prices of the notes. For additional information, see “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and
Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — The Estimated Value of the Notes Is Derived by Reference to an Internal Funding Rate” in this
pricing supplement.
The value of the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes is derived from internal pricing models of our
affiliates. These models are dependent on inputs such as the traded market prices of comparable derivative instruments and on
various other inputs, some of which are market-observable, and which can include volatility, dividend rates, interest rates and other
factors, as well as assumptions about future market events and/or environments. Accordingly, the estimated value of the notes is
determined when the terms of the notes are set based on market conditions and other relevant factors and assumptions existing at that
time.
The estimated value of the notes does not represent future values of the notes and may differ from others’ estimates. Different pricing
models and assumptions could provide valuations for the notes that are greater than or less than the estimated value of the notes. In
addition, market conditions and other relevant factors in the future may change, and any assumptions may prove to be incorrect. On
future dates, the value of the notes could change significantly based on, among other things, changes in market conditions, our or
JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s creditworthiness, interest rate movements and other relevant factors, which may impact the price, if any, at
which JPMS would be willing to buy notes from you in secondary market transactions.
The estimated value of the notes is lower than the original issue price of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring
and hedging the notes are included in the original issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions paid to JPMS
and other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, the projected profits, if any, that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in
hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes. Because hedging our
obligations entails risk and may be influenced by market forces beyond our control, this hedging may result in a profit that is more or
less than expected, or it may result in a loss. A portion of the profits, if any, realized in hedging our obligations under the notes may be

PS-14 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
allowed to other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, and we or one or more of our affiliates will retain any remaining hedging profits. See
“Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — The Estimated
Value of the Notes Is Lower Than the Original Issue Price (Price to Public) of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
Secondary Market Prices of the Notes
For information about factors that will impact any secondary market prices of the notes, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to the
Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — Secondary market prices of the notes will be impacted by many
economic and market factors” in the accompanying product supplement. In addition, we generally expect that some of the costs
included in the original issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in connection with any repurchases of your notes by
JPMS in an amount that will decline to zero over an initial predetermined period. These costs can include selling commissions,
projected hedging profits, if any, and, in some circumstances, estimated hedging costs and our internal secondary market funding rates
for structured debt issuances. This initial predetermined time period is intended to be the shorter of six months and one-half of the
stated term of the notes. The length of any such initial period reflects the structure of the notes, whether our affiliates expect to earn a
profit in connection with our hedging activities, the estimated costs of hedging the notes and when these costs are incurred, as
determined by our affiliates. See “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices
of the Notes — The Value of the Notes as Published by JPMS (and Which May Be Reflected on Customer Account Statements) May
Be Higher Than the Then-Current Estimated Value of the Notes for a Limited Time Period” in this pricing supplement.
Supplemental Use of Proceeds
The notes are offered to meet investor demand for products that reflect the risk-return profile and market exposure provided by the
notes. See “How the Notes Work” and “Hypothetical Payout Examples” in this pricing supplement for an illustration of the risk-return
profile of the notes and “The Underlyings” in this pricing supplement for a description of the market exposure provided by the notes.
The original issue price of the notes is equal to the estimated value of the notes plus the selling commissions paid to JPMS and other
affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, plus (minus) the projected profits (losses) that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent
in hedging our obligations under the notes, plus the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes.
Validity of the Notes and the Guarantee
In the opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as special products counsel to JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co., when the
notes offered by this pricing supplement have been issued by JPMorgan Financial pursuant to the indenture, the trustee and/or paying
agent has made, in accordance with the instructions from JPMorgan Financial, the appropriate entries or notations in its records relating
to the master global note that represents such notes (the “master note”), and such notes have been delivered against payment as
contemplated herein, such notes will be valid and binding obligations of JPMorgan Financial and the related guarantee will constitute a
valid and binding obligation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., enforceable in accordance with their terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, concepts of reasonableness and equitable principles of general
applicability (including, without limitation, concepts of good faith, fair dealing and the lack of bad faith), provided that such counsel
expresses no opinion as to (i) the effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer or similar provision of applicable law on the
conclusions expressed above or (ii) any provision of the indenture that purports to avoid the effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent
transfer or similar provision of applicable law by limiting the amount of JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s obligation under the related guarantee.
This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited to the laws of the State of New York, the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware and the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act. In addition, this opinion is subject to customary assumptions about the
trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the indenture and its authentication of the master note and the validity, binding nature
and enforceability of the indenture with respect to the trustee, all as stated in the letter of such counsel dated February 24, 2023, which
was filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 by JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co. on February 24,
2023.
Additional Terms Specific to the Notes
You should read this pricing supplement together with the accompanying prospectus, as supplemented by the accompanying
prospectus supplement relating to our Series A medium-term notes of which these notes are a part, the accompanying prospectus
addendum and the more detailed information contained in the accompanying product supplement and the accompanying underlying
supplement. This pricing supplement, together with the documents listed below, contains the terms of the notes and supersedes all
other prior or contemporaneous oral statements as well as any other written materials including preliminary or indicative pricing terms,
correspondence, trade ideas, structures for implementation, sample structures, fact sheets, brochures or other educational materials of

PS-15 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
ours. You should carefully consider, among other things, the matters set forth in the “Risk Factors” sections of the accompanying
prospectus supplement and the accompanying product supplement and in Annex A to the accompanying prospectus addendum, as the
notes involve risks not associated with conventional debt securities. We urge you to consult your investment, legal, tax, accounting and
other advisers before you invest in the notes.
You may access these documents on the SEC website at www.sec.gov as follows (or if such address has changed, by
reviewing our filings for the relevant date on the SEC website):
• Product supplement no. 4-I dated April 13, 2023:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000121390023029539/ea152803_424b2.pdf
• Underlying supplement no. 1-I dated April 13, 2023:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000121390023029543/ea151873_424b2.pdf
• Prospectus supplement and prospectus, each dated April 13, 2023:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000095010323005751/crt_dp192097-424b2.pdf
• Prospectus addendum dated June 3, 2024:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1665650/000095010324007599/dp211753_424b3.htm
Our Central Index Key, or CIK, on the SEC website is 1665650, and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s CIK is 19617. As used in this pricing
supplement, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to JPMorgan Financial.

PS-16 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
Annex A
The Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM
All information contained in this pricing supplement regarding the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM, including, without limitation,
its make-up, method of calculation and changes in its components, has been derived from publicly available information, without
independent verification. This information reflects the policies of, and is subject to change by, The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
(“Nasdaq”). The Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM was developed by Nasdaq and is calculated, maintained and published by
The Nasdaq OMX Group, Inc. (“Nasdaq OMX”). Neither Nasdaq nor Nasdaq OMX has any obligation to continue to publish, and may
discontinue publication of, the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM.
The Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM began on February 22, 2006 at a base value of 1,000.00. The Nasdaq-100® Technology
Sector IndexSM is reported by Bloomberg, L.P. under the ticker symbol “NDXT.”
The Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM is an equal-weighted, price-return index designed to measure the performance of the
technology companies in the Nasdaq-100 Index®.
Security Eligibility Criteria
The Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM contains securities of the Nasdaq-100 Index® which are classified as Technology
according to the Industry Classification Benchmark (“ICB”). The eligibility for the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM is
determined in a 2-step process and the security has to meet both criteria in order to become eligible for the Nasdaq-100® Technology
Sector IndexSM. For additional information about the Nasdaq-100 Index®, including the methodology for inclusion in the Nasdaq-100
Index®, see “Equity Index Descriptions — The Nasdaq-100 Index®” in the accompanying underlying supplement.
Parent Index
The security must be included in the Nasdaq-100 Index®, which includes 100 of the largest domestic and international non-financial
companies listed on the Nasdaq.
Industry or Sector Eligibility
The company must be classified as a Technology Company (any company classified under the Technology Industry) according to ICB.
Constituent Selection
All securities that meet the applicable Security Eligibility Criteria described above are included in the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector
IndexSM.
Constituent Weighting
The Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM employs an equal weighting methodology such that each company’s Index market value
is rebalanced quarterly to an equal-dollar value corresponding to an equal percent weight of the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector
IndexSM’s aggregate market value. Index Shares are calculated by dividing this equal-dollar market value for each Index Security by
the corresponding Last Sale Price of the security at the close of trading on the third Friday in March, June, September, and December.
In the case of multiple share classes of a company being included in the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM, the equal-weighted
market value will be divided equally among the securities of that company.
Index Calculation
The Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM is an equal weighted, price return index. The Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM
is calculated without regard to ordinary dividends, however, it does reflect special dividends. The formula is as follows:
(1) “Index Market Value” shall be calculated as follows:
“Index Security” shall mean a security that has been selected for membership in the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM,
having met all applicable eligibility requirements.
n = Number of Index Securities included in the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM
𝑞𝑖= Number of shares of Index Security i applied in the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM.
𝑝𝑖 = Price in quote currency of Index Security i. Depending on the time of the calculation, the price can be either of the
following:

PS-17 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
a. The Start of Day (SOD) price which is the previous index calculation day’s ( t -1) closing price for Index Security i
adjusted for corporate action(s) occurring prior to market open on date t, if any, for the SOD calculation only;
b. The intraday price which reflects the current trading price received from the Nasdaq during the index calculation day;
c. The End of Day (EOD) price refers to the Last Sale Price, which refers to the last regular-way trade reported on
Nasdaq; or
d. The Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP)
𝑡 = current index calculation day
𝑡-1 = current index calculation day
(2) “PR Index Divisor” should be calculated as follows:
The Index Divisor serves the purpose of scaling an Index Market Value to lower order of magnitude, which is recommended for
reporting purposes. The Index Divisor is adjusted to ensure that changes in an Index Security’s price or shares either by corporate
actions or index participation which occur outside of trading hours do not affect the index value. An Index Divisor change occurs
after the close of the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM.
Index Maintenance
Deletion Policy
If a component of the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM is removed from the Nasdaq-100 Index® for any reason, it is also
removed from the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM at the same time.
Replacement Policy
When a component of the Nasdaq-100 Index® that is classified as Technology according to ICB is removed from the Nasdaq-100
Index, it is also removed from the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index. As such, if the replacement company being added to the
Nasdaq-100 Index® is classified as Technology according to ICB, it is added to the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and will
assume the weight of the removed company on the Index effective date.
When a component of the Nasdaq-100 Index® that is not classified as Technology according to ICB is removed and the replacement
company being added to the Nasdaq-100 Index is classified as Technology according to ICB, the replacement company is considered
for addition to the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index at the next quarterly Rebalance. When a component of the Nasdaq-100 Index
that is classified as Technology according to ICB is removed from the Nasdaq-100 Index and the replacement company being added to
the Nasdaq-100 Index® is not classified as Technology according to ICB, the company is removed from the Nasdaq-100® Technology
Sector IndexSM and the divisor of the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM is adjusted to ensure Index continuity.
Additions Policy
If a security is added to the Nasdaq-100 Index® for any reason, it may be added to the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM at the
same time.
Corporate Actions
In the interim periods between scheduled index reconstitution and rebalance events, individual Index securities may be the subject to a
variety of corporate actions and events that require maintenance and adjustments to the Index.
In certain cases, corporate actions and events are handled according to the weighting scheme or other index construction techniques
employed. Wherever alternate methods are described, the Index will follow the “Non-Market Cap Corporate Action Method.”
Index Share Adjustments
Other than as a direct result of corporate actions, the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM does not normally experience share
adjustments between scheduled index rebalance and reconstitution events.
License Agreement
JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliate intends to enter into a non-exclusive license agreement with Nasdaq providing for the license to it
and certain of its affiliates or subsidiaries, including JPMorgan Financial, with a non-exclusive license and, for a fee, with the right to use
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM in connection with certain securities, including the notes.
The license agreement with Nasdaq provides that the following language must be stated in this pricing supplement:
The notes are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Nasdaq Inc. or its affiliates (Nasdaq, with its affiliates, are referred to as
the “Corporations”). The Corporations have not passed on the legality or suitability of, or the accuracy or adequacy of descriptions and

PS-18 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the Least Performing of the Russell 2000® Index,
the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM and the Utilities Select Sector
SPDR® Fund
disclosures relating to, the notes. The Corporations make no representation or warranty, express or implied, to the owners of the notes
or any member of the public regarding the advisability of investing in securities generally or in the notes particularly, or the ability of the
Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM to track general stock market performance. The Corporations’ only relationship to the Issuer,
the Guarantor (if applicable) and their affiliates is in the licensing of Nasdaq®, Nasdaq-100® and Nasdaq-100 Index® registered
trademarks, service marks and certain trade names of the Corporations and the use of the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM
which is determined, composed and calculated by Nasdaq without regard to the Issuer or the Guarantor (if applicable) or the notes.
Nasdaq has no obligation to take the needs of the Issuer or the Guarantor (if applicable) or the owners of the notes into consideration in
determining, composing or calculating the Nasdaq-100® Technology Sector IndexSM. The Corporations are not responsible for and
have not participated in the determination of the timing of, prices at, or quantities of the notes to be issued or in the determination or
calculation of the equation by which the notes are to be converted into cash. The Corporations have no liability in connection with the
administration, marketing or trading of the notes.
THE CORPORATIONS DO NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY AND/OR UNINTERRUPTED CALCULATION OF THE NASDAQ-
100® TECHNOLOGY SECTOR INDEXSM OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. THE CORPORATIONS MAKE NO WARRANTY,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE ISSUER, THE GUARANTOR (IF APPLICABLE), OWNERS
OF THE NOTES, OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FROM THE USE OF THE NASDAQ-100® TECHNOLOGY SECTOR
INDEXSM OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. THE CORPORATIONS MAKE NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, AND
EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE
WITH RESPECT TO THE NASDAQ-100® TECHNOLOGY SECTOR INDEXSM OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. WITHOUT
LIMITING ANY OF THE FOREGOING, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE CORPORATIONS HAVE ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY LOST
PROFITS OR SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

FAQ

What is the JPMorgan AMJB structured note offering described in this document?

The offering is $841,000 of structured Review Notes issued by JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, fully and unconditionally guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co.. The notes are linked to the least performing of the Russell 2000 Index, the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index and the Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund and are scheduled to mature on December 6, 2030.

How does the automatic call feature work on the AMJB Review Notes?

On each scheduled Review Date, starting on December 7, 2026, if the closing value of each underlying is at or above its Call Value (100% of its Initial Value), the notes are automatically called. For each $1,000 note, investors then receive $1,000 plus a Call Premium Amount, which begins at 11.2500% × $1,000 on the first Review Date and increases stepwise to 56.2500% × $1,000 on the final Review Date.

What do AMJB investors receive at maturity if the notes are not called early?

If the notes are not automatically called and the Final Value of each underlying is at least its Barrier Amount of 70.00% of Initial Value, investors receive the full $1,000 principal per note at maturity. If the Final Value of any underlying is less than its Barrier Amount, the payment per $1,000 note is $1,000 + ($1,000 × Least Performing Underlying Return), so investors lose 1% of principal for each 1% decline in the least performing underlying from its Initial Value and can lose all principal.

What key risks are highlighted for investors considering the AMJB notes?

The notes do not guarantee any return of principal and investors may lose more than 30% of principal and possibly all of it. They pay no interest and investors do not receive dividends on the fund or underlying securities. The notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of JPMorgan Chase Financial, fully guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co., exposing holders to the credit risk of both entities. Additional risks include liquidity risk because the notes are not listed on any exchange, potential conflicts of interest, and sector and small-cap exposure risks tied to the underlyings.

What are the pricing, fees and estimated value for the AMJB structured notes?

Each AMJB note has a price to public of $1,000. Selling commissions are $41.25 per $1,000 note, so the issuer’s proceeds are $958.75 per note. In total, the transaction size is $841,000, with $34,691.25 in fees and commissions and $806,308.75 of proceeds to the issuer. The estimated value at pricing is $926.80 per $1,000 note, reflecting costs for selling, structuring and hedging.

Are the AMJB Review Notes principal protected or insured by the FDIC?

No. The notes do not guarantee principal; if the Final Value of any underlying is below its Barrier Amount and the notes are not called, investors can lose a significant portion or all of their investment. The notes are not bank deposits, are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency, and are not obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank, though they are guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co.