ARMK Form 4: Chief HR Officer Receives 64.783 Dividend-Equivalent Shares
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Aramark (ARMK) Form 4 — insider acquisition via dividend equivalents
Senior Vice President & Chief HR Officer Abigail Charpentier was reported as acquiring 64.783 shares of Aramark common stock on 08/20/2025 at a reported price of $0, described as dividend equivalent rights that vested with underlying restricted stock units. After the transaction, the reporting person beneficially owned 54,056.256 shares. The filing was signed by an attorney-in-fact on 08/21/2025. The entry indicates these are non-cash, compensation-related share credits tied to quarterly dividends and the vesting schedule of the underlying awards.
Positive
- Insider transparency: The filing discloses the transaction and current beneficial ownership of 54,056.256 shares.
- Compensation alignment: Dividend equivalent rights vest with underlying restricted stock units, aligning executive pay with shareholder outcomes.
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: Routine compensation-related issuance of dividend equivalents; small incremental economic impact relative to total holdings.
The Form 4 documents a non-cash acquisition of 64.783 shares via dividend equivalent rights tied to restricted stock units, which commonly occurs when companies credit dividend equivalents on unvested awards. This does not reflect an open-market purchase or sale and is compensation accounting in nature. The reporting person’s total beneficial ownership of 54,056.256 shares is disclosed, providing transparency on insider stake. For investors, this is a routine disclosure with limited standalone market impact.
TL;DR: Administrative vesting of dividend equivalents; governance disclosure requirements satisfied.
The filing satisfies Section 16 reporting for an officer, showing issuance of dividend equivalent rights that vest along with restricted stock units. The transaction code and zero price indicate these are not market transactions but compensatory credits. The clear statement of beneficial ownership and the attorney-in-fact signature indicate proper procedural compliance. This is a routine governance disclosure rather than an indicator of material corporate action.