false
0001674632
0001674632
2025-06-22
2025-06-22
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 22, 2025
Beta Bionics, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware |
|
001-42491 |
|
47-5386878 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation) |
|
(Commission File Number) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification
No.) |
11 Hughes
Irvine, California 92618
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 427-7785
N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities
Act (17 CFR 230.425)
☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange
Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
☐ Pre-commencement communications
pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class |
|
Trading
symbol(s) |
|
Name of each exchange
on which registered |
| Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share |
|
BBNX |
|
Nasdaq Global Market |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company
as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company ☒
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant
to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure
On June 22, 2025, Beta Bionics, Inc.
(the “Company”) hosted its first Investor and Analyst Event in conjunction with the 85th Scientific Sessions of
the American Diabetes Association (“ADA”). A copy of the presentation to be used by the Company during the event (the “Presentation”)
is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein. A copy of the Presentation will also be available on the Company’s
website in the “Investors – Events & Presentations” section at https://investors.betabionics.com. Information contained
in, or that can be accessed through, the Company's website is not incorporated by reference into this report.
The information contained under this
Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it
be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Exchange Act, regardless
of any general incorporation language in any such filing, unless the Company expressly sets forth in such filing that such information
is to be considered “filed” or incorporated by reference therein.
Item 8.01 Other Events
On June 22, 2025, the Company announced updated “Real-world”
iLet Bionic Pancreas (“iLet”) data sourced from iLet users who uploaded continuous glucose monitor (“CGM”) readings
to the Beta Bionics cloud over the first two years after the iLet’s commercial launch (May 19, 2023 to May 18, 2025). 16,439 iLet
users uploaded at least three-weeks’ worth of iLet data. Of those 16,439 iLet users, 14,952 had a pre-iLet baseline HbA1c value
available (as provided to us by the medical providers).
Figure 1 shows the change from baseline HbA1c to glucose
management indicator (“GMI”) – a population-based estimate of HbA1c based on mean CGM glucose that is widely accepted
as an indicator in the diabetes industry – on the iLet for the group of 14,952 iLet users. Data from these users showed an overall
improvement from an average baseline HbA1c of 8.9% to an average GMI of 7.3% on the iLet. Users saw a meaningful change from baseline
HbA1c to follow-up GMI on iLet regardless of their baseline HbA1c. Additionally, over 84% of these users met the ADA’s hypoglycemia
goals of less than 4% time below 70 mg/dL and less than 1% time below 54 mg/dL.
Figure 1. All iLet Users: Change from Baseline HbA1c
to Follow-Up GMI While On the iLet

Figure 2 shows the HbA1c of adults with Type 1 Diabetes
(“T1D”) in the United States based on the real-world data included in Pettus et al., Diabetes Care 2019;42:2220–2227
(“Pettus study”). The Pettus study included data from 31,430 adults, sourced from the Optum Humedica database between July
2014 and June 2016. Figure 2 also shows the baseline HbA1c of 10,333 iLet users who are adults and have T1D (as provided to us by the
medical providers). The 10,333 iLet users included in Figure 2 who are adults and have T1D are a subgroup of the aforementioned 14,952
iLet users.
Figure 2. HbA1c of Adults with T1D in the U.S. Versus
Baseline HbA1c of iLet Adult Users with T1D

Figure 3 shows the HbA1c of adults with T1D in the United
States based on the Pettus study. Figure 3 also shows the follow-up GMI on iLet of the same 10,333 iLet users who are adults and have
T1D as described above.
Figure 3. HbA1c of Adults with T1D in the U.S. Versus
Follow-Up GMI of iLet Adult Users with T1D

Figure 4 shows the change from baseline HbA1c to GMI
on the iLet for iLet users whose previous therapy before starting iLet was multiple daily injections (“MDI”) (as provided
to us by the medical providers). Of the aforementioned 14,952 iLet users, 8,802 iLet users were identified as using MDI as their most
recent therapy prior to starting iLet. Data from these previous MDI users showed an overall improvement from an average baseline HbA1c
of 9.2% to an average GMI of 7.3% on the iLet. Users saw a meaningful change from baseline HbA1c to follow-up GMI on iLet regardless of
their baseline HbA1c. Additionally, over 85% of users met the ADA’s aforementioned hypoglycemia goals.
Figure 4. iLet Users Coming from MDI: Change from Baseline
HbA1c to Follow-Up GMI While On the iLet

Figure 5 shows the change from baseline HbA1c to GMI
on the iLet for iLet users whose previous therapy before starting iLet was a competitive hybrid-closed loop (“HCL”) system
(as provided to us directly by users). Competitive HCL systems include Tandem’s t:slim X2 and Mobi, Insulet’s Omnipod 5, and
Medtronic’s MiniMed 670G, 720G, 750G, 760G, 770G, and 780G. Of the aforementioned 14,952 iLet users, 2,910 iLet users were identified
as using a competitive HCL system as their most recent therapy prior to starting iLet. Data from these previous competitive HCL system
users showed an overall improvement from an average baseline HbA1c of 8.1% to an average GMI of 7.3% on the iLet. Users saw a meaningful
change from baseline HbA1c to follow-up GMI on iLet regardless of their baseline HbA1c. Additionally, over 83% of users met the ADA’s
aforementioned hypoglycemia goals.
Figure 5. iLet Users Coming from Competitive HCL Systems:
Change from Baseline HbA1c to Follow-Up GMI While On the iLet

Figure 6 shows the change from baseline HbA1c to GMI
on the iLet for iLet users who are treated in endocrinology practices and primary care practices (as determined by Symphony Health Solutions’
database and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ National Plan and Provider Enumeration System). Of the aforementioned
14,952 iLet users, 13,566 iLet users were identified as being treated in endocrinology practices, and 1,036 iLet users were identified
as being treated in primary care practices. Data from iLet users treated in endocrinology practices and users treated in primary care
practices showed a similar overall improvement from an average baseline HbA1c of 8.9% to an average GMI of 7.3% on the iLet. Users saw
a similar improvement from baseline HbA1c to follow-up GMI on iLet regardless of their provider practice type. Additionally, over 84%
of users met the ADA’s aforementioned hypoglycemia goals regardless of their provider practice type.
Figure 6. iLet Users Treated by Type of Provider Practice
(Endocrinology or Primary Care)

Figure 7 shows the change from baseline HbA1c to GMI
on the iLet for iLet users who use the pump in a “fully-closed loop” manner, defined as iLet users who announced less than
one meal per day, on average, over the 21-day period from April 28, 2025 to May 18, 2025 (as determined by meal announcements inputted
into the iLet App). Of the aforementioned 14,952 iLet users, 2,416 iLet users were identified as using the pump in a “fully-closed
loop” manner. On average, “fully-closed loop” iLet users announced approximately one meal every three days. Data from
“fully-closed loop” iLet users showed an overall improvement from an average baseline HbA1c of 9.4% to an average GMI of 7.5%
on the iLet during the 21-day period. Users saw a meaningful change from baseline HbA1c to follow-up GMI on iLet regardless of their baseline
HbA1c, and approximately 83% of users met the ADA’s aforementioned hypoglycemia goals. Additionally, those users showed an average
time in range (defined as blood glucose levels between 70 and 180 mg/dL as determined by CGM readings) of approximately 62%. Lastly, 530
iLet users were identified as not having announced a single meal in the aforementioned 21-day period, and those users showed an overall
improvement from an average baseline HbA1c of 9.4% to an average GMI of 7.4% on the iLet during the 21-day period. Additionally, approximately
86% of those users met the ADA’s aforementioned hypoglycemia goals.
Figure 7. “Fully-Closed” Loop iLet Users:
Change from Baseline HbA1c to Follow-Up GMI
While On the iLet

Figure 8 shows the change from baseline HbA1c to follow-up
GMI on the iLet relative to the duration of iLet use from initialization to day 42. These data are sourced from all iLet users who uploaded
CGM readings to the Beta Bionics cloud over the first two years after the iLet’s commercial launch (May 19, 2023 to May 18, 2025).
90% of these users had a baseline HbA1c available, but all users were included in the analysis regardless of whether or not they had a
baseline HbA1c available. In total, 30,077 iLet sessions were uploaded. A session reflects each initial use of an iLet or after a factory
reset. Most iLets had only one session. iLet sessions showed an overall improvement from an average baseline HbA1c of 8.9% to an average
GMI of 7.4% on the iLet after 42 days. On average, the iLet sessions took two days to reach a near steady-state GMI of 7.4%, suggesting
that the adaptive algorithm “warms-up” just two days after initiation.
Figure 8. Change from Baseline HbA1c to Follow-Up
GMI On the iLet Relative to the Duration of iLet Use

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This Current Report on Form 8-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements in this Current
Report on Form 8-K that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include,
without limitation, statements regarding the potential benefits of the iLet, including the overall improvement reflected in the data between
average baseline HbA1c and an average GMI on the iLet. These forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of the management of
the Company as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the Company. Such statements reflect the current views
of the Company with respect to future events and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including business, regulatory,
economic and competitive risks and uncertainties about the Company, including, without limitation, risks inherent in developing product
candidates, future results from the Company’s ongoing and future studies and clinical trials, the Company’s ability to obtain
adequate financing to fund its product development and other expenses, risks that real-world data or future results may not be consistent
with interim, initial or preliminary results or results from prior preclinical studies or clinical trials, trends in the industry, the
Company’s relationships with its existing and future collaboration partners, the legal and regulatory framework for the industry,
future expenditures and the potential impacts of global macroeconomic conditions. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the events
or circumstances referred to in the forward-looking statements may not occur. The actual results may vary from the anticipated results
and the variations may be material. Other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results to differ from current expectations
are discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the section titled “Risk Factors”
in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this Current Report on Form 8-K is given. Except as required
by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits.
| |
|
| Exhibit No. |
Description |
| |
|
| 99.1 |
Investor and Analyst Event Presentation |
| 104 |
Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document) |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| |
|
|
| |
Beta Bionics, Inc. |
| |
|
|
| |
By: |
/s/ Sean Saint |
| |
|
Sean Saint |
| |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Dated: June 23, 2025