BCS 13F Amendment: Restatement Corrects Holdings Reporting for Q2 2025
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Barclays PLC amended its Form 13F for the quarter ended 06-30-2025 to restate previously filed holdings. The amendment corrects a technical issue that had caused certain positions to be inaccurately reflected in the original filing. The report lists 6 other included managers associated with Barclays entities and shows a total of 12,350 information table entries representing a reported aggregate value of $436,375,096. The amendment is signed by Suejean Mott, Director, and indicates the firm is reporting a full 13F holdings report for this manager.
Positive
- Amendment issued to correct prior inaccuracies, improving reported data integrity
- Comprehensive scope reported: the filing states this is a full 13F holdings report for the reporting manager
- Clear aggregate metrics: 12,350 information table entries totaling $436,375,096
Negative
- Restatement due to a technical issue, indicating the original filing contained inaccuracies
- Filing does not disclose which specific positions changed or the magnitude of corrections versus the original report
Insights
TL;DR: Barclays corrected its 13F to reflect previously omitted or inaccurate positions; total disclosed value is $436.4M across 12,350 entries.
The amendment restates the 13F for the quarter ended 06-30-2025 due to a technical issue that affected position reporting. The corrected filing shows a substantial information table size (12,350 entries) and a combined value of $436,375,096, which quantifies the public equity exposure being reported. For investors and analysts, the key facts are the scale of the disclosure and that this filing purports to be a complete 13F holdings report for the reporting manager.
TL;DR: The amendment signals an operational reporting error corrected via restatement; no new transaction detail is provided here.
The filing explicitly states it is a restatement and attributes the change to a technical issue that led to certain positions not being accurately reflected in the original submission. While the amendment addresses accuracy, the document does not detail which positions changed or quantify the magnitude of differences versus the prior filing, limiting assessment of compliance or risk impact from this filing alone.