[NT 10-Q] CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. SEC Filing
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) submitted a Form 12b-25 notifying the SEC that its NT 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 could not be filed on time because the company has not finalized its financial statements.
The registrant states the delay could not be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense and expects to file the 10-Q within the five-calendar-day grace period under Exchange Act Rule 12b-25. The company indicates all other periodic reports have been filed and no significant change in year-over-year results is anticipated.
- Registrant expects to file the NT 10-Q within the five-day grace period provided by Exchange Act Rule 12b-25
- All other periodic reports required in the preceding 12 months have been filed
- Company indicated no anticipated significant change in results of operations compared with the corresponding prior-year period
- Financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 were not finalized, preventing timely filing of the NT 10-Q
- The registrant states the delay could not be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense, indicating a material timing issue in the close or review process
Insights
TL;DR: Routine late filing; management expects to file within the five-day grace period and reports no anticipated material change in results.
The Form 12b-25 shows the company did not finalize its June 30, 2025 financial statements in time to meet the original deadline and invoked the five-day extension under Rule 12b-25. For investors, the key facts are procedural: the delay is attributed to incomplete financials, the company affirms other periodic filings are current, and it does not anticipate significant year-over-year operational changes.
TL;DR: Governance disclosure is compliant but highlights internal controls or close-process timing issues around quarter-end close.
The notification is a formal, compliant disclosure of a late NT 10-Q filing. It identifies the CFO as the contact and confirms the reason is unfinished financial statements rather than a restatement or adverse result. While the filing itself is routine, repeated occurrences could signal process weaknesses; this single notification, however, supplies no evidence of accounting irregularity.