CCLD Form 144 Notice — 11,960 CCLDO Pref Series B for Sale on NASDAQ
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Form 144 notice for CCLD Preferred Series B: The filing reports a proposed sale of 11,960 shares of CCLDO Preferred Series B with an aggregate market value of $252,000 on an approximate sale date of 09/29/2025 on NASDAQ. The broker listed is Chapin Davis Investments (address provided). The securities were acquired from CareCloud, Inc. as compensation: 5,480 shares on 02/19/2022 and 6,480 shares on 12/16/2024, matching the total to be sold. The filer reports no securities sold in the past three months and includes the standard representation that the seller is not aware of undisclosed material adverse information.
Positive
- Complete disclosure of number of shares (11,960), aggregate market value ($252,000), approximate sale date (09/29/2025) and exchange (NASDAQ)
- Acquisition history is provided showing the shares were received as compensation on 02/19/2022 (5,480) and 12/16/2024 (6,480), matching the total to be sold
- No sales in past three months are reported, which clarifies recent trading activity
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR Proposed sale of 11,960 preferred shares totaling $252,000, acquired as compensation in 2022 and 2024.
The filing is a routine Rule 144 notice documenting an insider/affiliate sale process through a broker with full disclosure of acquisition dates and amounts. The total amount and acquisition history are clearly stated, and there are no reported sales in the prior three months. From an investor-disclosure perspective, the form provides the necessary elements to satisfy Rule 144 notice requirements but does not include the identity of the selling person in the visible fields.
TL;DR Transparent filing of compensatory-origin preferred shares being offered for sale; no adverse items disclosed.
The document documents compensation-issued preferred shares being offered for sale and includes the broker and aggregate value. It contains the required representation regarding material undisclosed information. The filing does not present material governance concerns on its face, but it also omits the explicit named seller field in the visible content, which is a disclosure gap in the provided text rather than necessarily in the form itself.