[SCHEDULE 13G/A] Enerflex Ltd. SEC Filing
Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd., a British-Columbia-based investment adviser, filed Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) covering the ownership position as of 30 Jun 2025.
- Beneficial ownership: 5,698,625 common shares, representing 4.6 % of the outstanding class.
- Sole voting power: 5,242,565 shares.
- Sole dispositive power: 5,698,625 shares.
- No shared voting or dispositive power reported.
- The filer is classified as an investment adviser under Rule 13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(E).
- The certification states the shares were acquired in the ordinary course and not to influence control of the issuer.
- The filing notes “Ownership of 5 percent or less,” indicating the stake is below the 5 % threshold that ordinarily triggers initial 13G reporting.
- Signed by Chief Compliance Officer Derrick Crowe on 31 Jul 2025.
No financial performance metrics, transactions, or strategic intentions are disclosed; the document is limited to passive ownership information.
- Institutional investor retains a 4.6 % stake, indicating ongoing professional interest in Enerflex.
- None.
Insights
TL;DR — Neutral; passive 4.6 % stake signals routine portfolio adjustment.
The amended 13G shows Connor, Clark & Lunn holds 5.7 M Enerflex shares with full dispositive authority but below the 5 % threshold. As a passive investment adviser, the firm affirms no intent to influence control. From a portfolio perspective, continued institutional ownership lends credibility yet does not meaningfully alter Enerflex’s shareholder structure or governance dynamics. Impact on valuation or float is negligible.
TL;DR — Regulatory compliance filing; minimal market impact.
This Amendment No. 1 satisfies Rule 13d-2(b) obligations following a change in holding size. The ‘ownership of 5 percent or less’ language suggests the filer’s position slipped under the statutory threshold, yet amendment is still required until year-end. No control, activist, or group activity is alleged. Consequently, the disclosure is largely informational and should not be interpreted as a strategic move.