As previously reported, on November 19, 2025, Exact Sciences Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Exact”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Abbott Laboratories, an Illinois corporation (“Abbott”), and Badger Merger Sub I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Abbott (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which, among other things and subject to the conditions contained in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Exact (the “Merger”), with Exact surviving as a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Abbott.
In connection with the Merger Agreement, Exact filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a preliminary proxy statement on December 29, 2025, and a definitive proxy statement (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”) on January 9, 2026. The Definitive Proxy Statement was first mailed to Exact stockholders on or about January 9, 2026.
As of February 10, 2026, three complaints have been filed in New York State court by purported stockholders of Exact in connection with the Merger: Johnson v. Exact Sciences Corp., et al., Index No. 650457/2026 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Jan. 27, 2026), Kent v. Exact Sciences Corp., et al., Index No. 650535/2026 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Jan. 28, 2026), and Smith v. Barber, et al., Index No. 56498/2026 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Jan. 29, 2026) (the “Smith Action”). The complaints generally allege that the Definitive Proxy Statement includes false and misleading information and/or fails to disclose allegedly material information in violation of New York State law. The Smith Action also alleges that Abbott violated Wisconsin securities laws. The complaints seek, among other things, to enjoin Exact from consummating the Merger or, in the alternative, rescissory damages, and an award of attorneys’ fees. In addition to these complaints, Exact has also received demands from purported stockholders alleging similar deficiencies and seeking supplemental disclosures (together with the complaints, the “Actions”).
Exact believes that the claims asserted in the Actions are without merit and that no additional disclosures were or are required under applicable law. However, to moot the unmeritorious disclosure claims, to avoid the risk of the Actions delaying or adversely affecting the Merger and to minimize the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation, without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, Exact has determined to make voluntarily the supplemental disclosures in this Current Report on Form 8-K. Nothing in this Current Report on Form 8-K shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the supplemental disclosures herein. To the contrary, Exact specifically denies all allegations in the Actions that any additional disclosure was or is required.
It is possible that additional, similar allegations may be made or the complaints described above may be amended. Exact does not intend to announce the filing of each additional, similar claim or any amended complaint.
Supplemental Disclosures
The following supplemental disclosures (the “Supplemental Disclosures”) should be read in conjunction with the Definitive Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety. Defined terms used in the Supplemental Disclosures that are not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Definitive Proxy Statement. All page references in the Supplemental Disclosures are to pages in the Definitive Proxy Statement. Paragraph references in the Supplemental Disclosures refer to paragraphs in the Definitive Proxy Statement before any additions or deletions resulting from the Supplemental Disclosures. The information herein speaks only as of February 10, 2026, unless (and then only to the extent) the information indicates another date applies. For clarity, new text within restated portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement is indicated by bold typeface and underlining, and deleted passages are indicated by bold strikethrough text.
| 1. |
The disclosure in the section of the Definitive Proxy Statement entitled “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement—Opinion of Centerview Partners LLC—Summary of Centerview Financial Analysis—Discounted Cash Flow Analysis” is amended by modifying the third paragraph on page 43 to read in its entirety as follows: |