[144] First BanCorp. SEC Filing
First BanCorp (FBP) reports a Rule 144 notice proposing the sale of 10,000 shares of its common stock through Merrill Lynch on the NYSE, with an aggregate market value of $211,000. The filing shows the 10,000 shares were acquired as restricted stock awards issued as compensation in multiple grants between 2017 and 2022, and the holdings to be sold equal the sum of those grants. The filing lists the company’s outstanding shares as 160,469,644, making the proposed sale a very small fraction of total shares. The filer certifies they are not aware of any undisclosed material adverse information about the issuer.
- Compliance with Rule 144 disclosed, showing transparency about proposed insider sale
- Securities originated from restricted compensation grants, indicating the sale is converting vested compensation to cash rather than a gift or transfer
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: Proposed sale of 10,000 FBP shares (~0.006% of outstanding) is immaterial to capitalization and likely routine insider liquidity.
The filing notifies a planned Rule 144 sale of 10,000 First BanCorp shares via Merrill Lynch with an indicated market value of $211,000. Acquisition records show these shares originated from restricted stock compensation across 2017–2022 and total exactly 10,000 shares, indicating the sale would liquidate those specific grants. Relative to the stated 160.47 million outstanding shares, this disposal is negligible in size and unlikely to move market pricing or corporate control metrics. The filing is a standard compliance disclosure rather than a signal of company-level financial stress.
TL;DR: This is a routine disclosure of insider sales under Rule 144; governance implications appear minimal based on the data provided.
The notice documents that the securities to be sold were granted as restricted stock awards and that no gifts or third-party transfers are reported. The filer affirms no undisclosed material adverse information. Because the sale size is extremely small relative to the issuer’s outstanding shares, there is no evident governance concern such as insider divestiture that would materially alter ownership or signal a governance dispute. The record aligns with expected insider liquidity practices following vesting of compensation awards.