[DEF 14A] Graham Corporation Definitive Proxy Statement
On 15 July 2025, MSP Recovery, Inc. (Nasdaq: MSPR) filed an 8-K to disclose a material legal development. The Supreme Court of Maryland answered a certified question from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland and held that the assignments underpinning two pending lawsuits are not champertous. This favorable ruling removes a key procedural obstacle and permits the Company’s claims in those cases to move forward.
The decision does not determine liability or damages, but it materially strengthens MSPR’s litigation position by affirming the validity of its assignments under Maryland law. Management cautions that litigation outcomes remain uncertain and provided no quantitative guidance on potential recoveries. A related press release was filed as Exhibit 99.1.
No financial statements or earnings data accompanied the filing; therefore, immediate balance-sheet impact cannot be assessed. Nevertheless, the ruling may enhance the probability of future cash inflows from litigation settlements or judgments, while reducing the risk of dismissal on champerty grounds.
Il 15 luglio 2025, MSP Recovery, Inc. (Nasdaq: MSPR) ha presentato un 8-K per comunicare un importante sviluppo legale. La Corte Suprema del Maryland ha risposto a una domanda certificata dal Tribunale Distrettuale degli Stati Uniti per il Distretto del Maryland, stabilendo che le assegnazioni alla base di due cause pendenti non sono di tipo champertous. Questa sentenza favorevole elimina un ostacolo procedurale chiave e consente alle pretese della Società in quei casi di procedere.
La decisione non determina responsabilità o danni, ma rafforza significativamente la posizione processuale di MSPR confermando la validità delle sue assegnazioni secondo la legge del Maryland. La direzione avverte che l’esito del contenzioso resta incerto e non ha fornito indicazioni quantitative sui potenziali recuperi. Un comunicato stampa correlato è stato depositato come Allegato 99.1.
Non sono stati allegati bilanci o dati sugli utili; pertanto, non è possibile valutare un impatto immediato sul bilancio. Tuttavia, la sentenza potrebbe aumentare la probabilità di futuri flussi di cassa derivanti da accordi o sentenze giudiziarie, riducendo il rischio di rigetto per motivi di champerty.
El 15 de julio de 2025, MSP Recovery, Inc. (Nasdaq: MSPR) presentó un 8-K para informar sobre un desarrollo legal importante. La Corte Suprema de Maryland respondió a una pregunta certificada del Tribunal de Distrito de los EE. UU. para el Distrito de Maryland y determinó que las cesiones que sustentan dos demandas pendientes no son champertous. Esta decisión favorable elimina un obstáculo procesal clave y permite que las reclamaciones de la Compañía en esos casos sigan adelante.
La decisión no determina responsabilidad ni daños, pero fortalece considerablemente la posición litigiosa de MSPR al afirmar la validez de sus cesiones bajo la ley de Maryland. La gerencia advierte que los resultados del litigio siguen siendo inciertos y no proporcionó orientación cuantitativa sobre posibles recuperaciones. Se presentó un comunicado de prensa relacionado como Anexo 99.1.
No se acompañaron estados financieros ni datos de ganancias con la presentación; por lo tanto, no se puede evaluar un impacto inmediato en el balance. No obstante, la resolución podría aumentar la probabilidad de futuros ingresos en efectivo derivados de acuerdos o sentencias judiciales, mientras reduce el riesgo de desestimación por motivos de champerty.
2025년 7월 15일, MSP Recovery, Inc. (나스닥: MSPR)는 중요한 법적 발전을 공개하기 위해 8-K 보고서를 제출했습니다. 메릴랜드 주 대법원은 메릴랜드 지방법원으로부터 인증된 질문에 답변하며, 두 건의 진행 중인 소송의 근거가 되는 양도가 불법적인 중개(champertous)가 아니다라고 판결했습니다. 이 유리한 판결은 주요 절차적 장애물을 제거하고 회사의 해당 소송 청구가 진행될 수 있도록 허용합니다.
이번 결정은 책임이나 손해 배상 여부를 판단하지는 않지만, 메릴랜드 법에 따른 양도의 유효성을 확인함으로써 MSPR의 소송 입장을 크게 강화했습니다. 경영진은 소송 결과가 여전히 불확실하다고 경고하며 잠재적 회수액에 대한 수치적 지침은 제공하지 않았습니다. 관련 보도자료는 부록 99.1로 제출되었습니다.
재무제표나 수익 데이터는 제출되지 않아 즉각적인 재무상태표 영향은 평가할 수 없습니다. 그럼에도 이번 판결은 소송 합의나 판결로 인한 미래 현금 유입 가능성을 높이고 champerty(불법 중개) 사유로 인한 기각 위험을 줄일 수 있습니다.
Le 15 juillet 2025, MSP Recovery, Inc. (Nasdaq : MSPR) a déposé un 8-K pour divulguer un développement juridique important. La Cour suprême du Maryland a répondu à une question certifiée émanant du tribunal de district des États-Unis pour le district du Maryland et a statué que les cessions à l'origine de deux poursuites en cours ne sont pas champertous. Cette décision favorable supprime un obstacle procédural clé et permet à la société de poursuivre ses réclamations dans ces affaires.
La décision ne détermine pas la responsabilité ni les dommages-intérêts, mais renforce considérablement la position contentieuse de MSPR en confirmant la validité de ses cessions en vertu du droit du Maryland. La direction met en garde que les résultats des litiges restent incertains et n’a fourni aucune indication chiffrée sur les recouvrements potentiels. Un communiqué de presse lié a été déposé en annexe 99.1.
Aucun état financier ni donnée sur les résultats n’a accompagné le dépôt ; par conséquent, l’impact immédiat sur le bilan ne peut être évalué. Néanmoins, cette décision pourrait augmenter la probabilité de futurs flux de trésorerie issus de règlements ou de jugements, tout en réduisant le risque de rejet pour cause de champerty.
Am 15. Juli 2025 reichte MSP Recovery, Inc. (Nasdaq: MSPR) ein 8-K ein, um eine wesentliche rechtliche Entwicklung offenzulegen. Der Oberste Gerichtshof von Maryland beantwortete eine zertifizierte Frage des US-Bezirksgerichts für den District of Maryland und entschied, dass die Zuweisungen, die zwei anhängige Klagen untermauern, nicht champertous sind. Dieses positive Urteil beseitigt ein zentrales verfahrensrechtliches Hindernis und ermöglicht es dem Unternehmen, seine Ansprüche in diesen Fällen weiterzuverfolgen.
Die Entscheidung bestimmt nicht die Haftung oder Schadensersatz, stärkt jedoch die Prozessposition von MSPR erheblich, indem sie die Gültigkeit der Zuweisungen nach Maryland-Recht bestätigt. Das Management weist darauf hin, dass der Ausgang des Rechtsstreits weiterhin ungewiss ist und keine quantitativen Angaben zu möglichen Erträgen gemacht wurden. Eine zugehörige Pressemitteilung wurde als Anlage 99.1 eingereicht.
Es wurden keine Finanzberichte oder Gewinnzahlen beigefügt, daher kann eine unmittelbare Auswirkung auf die Bilanz nicht bewertet werden. Dennoch könnte das Urteil die Wahrscheinlichkeit künftiger Geldzuflüsse aus Prozessvergleichen oder Urteilen erhöhen und das Risiko einer Abweisung wegen Champerty verringern.
- Maryland Supreme Court ruling removes champerty risk, allowing two key lawsuits to proceed.
- Decision potentially increases probability of future litigation recoveries for MSPR.
- The filing states that litigation outcomes remain inherently uncertain; no guarantee of financial recovery.
- No quantitative guidance on potential damages, timing, or impact on earnings/cash flow.
Insights
TL;DR: Maryland Supreme Court validates MSPR litigation assignments, boosting case viability; financial upside possible but still unquantified.
The champerty argument was a significant defense hurdle. By affirming the validity of MSPR’s assignments, the Maryland Supreme Court improves the Company’s chances of pursuing recoveries tied to health-care reimbursement claims. Strategically, the ruling eliminates a binary dismissal risk and may strengthen MSPR’s settlement leverage. However, because damages, timing, and collectability remain uncertain, the market impact hinges on investors’ assessment of potential award size versus legal costs and duration. Overall, this is a positive but incomplete milestone warranting continued monitoring.
Il 15 luglio 2025, MSP Recovery, Inc. (Nasdaq: MSPR) ha presentato un 8-K per comunicare un importante sviluppo legale. La Corte Suprema del Maryland ha risposto a una domanda certificata dal Tribunale Distrettuale degli Stati Uniti per il Distretto del Maryland, stabilendo che le assegnazioni alla base di due cause pendenti non sono di tipo champertous. Questa sentenza favorevole elimina un ostacolo procedurale chiave e consente alle pretese della Società in quei casi di procedere.
La decisione non determina responsabilità o danni, ma rafforza significativamente la posizione processuale di MSPR confermando la validità delle sue assegnazioni secondo la legge del Maryland. La direzione avverte che l’esito del contenzioso resta incerto e non ha fornito indicazioni quantitative sui potenziali recuperi. Un comunicato stampa correlato è stato depositato come Allegato 99.1.
Non sono stati allegati bilanci o dati sugli utili; pertanto, non è possibile valutare un impatto immediato sul bilancio. Tuttavia, la sentenza potrebbe aumentare la probabilità di futuri flussi di cassa derivanti da accordi o sentenze giudiziarie, riducendo il rischio di rigetto per motivi di champerty.
El 15 de julio de 2025, MSP Recovery, Inc. (Nasdaq: MSPR) presentó un 8-K para informar sobre un desarrollo legal importante. La Corte Suprema de Maryland respondió a una pregunta certificada del Tribunal de Distrito de los EE. UU. para el Distrito de Maryland y determinó que las cesiones que sustentan dos demandas pendientes no son champertous. Esta decisión favorable elimina un obstáculo procesal clave y permite que las reclamaciones de la Compañía en esos casos sigan adelante.
La decisión no determina responsabilidad ni daños, pero fortalece considerablemente la posición litigiosa de MSPR al afirmar la validez de sus cesiones bajo la ley de Maryland. La gerencia advierte que los resultados del litigio siguen siendo inciertos y no proporcionó orientación cuantitativa sobre posibles recuperaciones. Se presentó un comunicado de prensa relacionado como Anexo 99.1.
No se acompañaron estados financieros ni datos de ganancias con la presentación; por lo tanto, no se puede evaluar un impacto inmediato en el balance. No obstante, la resolución podría aumentar la probabilidad de futuros ingresos en efectivo derivados de acuerdos o sentencias judiciales, mientras reduce el riesgo de desestimación por motivos de champerty.
2025년 7월 15일, MSP Recovery, Inc. (나스닥: MSPR)는 중요한 법적 발전을 공개하기 위해 8-K 보고서를 제출했습니다. 메릴랜드 주 대법원은 메릴랜드 지방법원으로부터 인증된 질문에 답변하며, 두 건의 진행 중인 소송의 근거가 되는 양도가 불법적인 중개(champertous)가 아니다라고 판결했습니다. 이 유리한 판결은 주요 절차적 장애물을 제거하고 회사의 해당 소송 청구가 진행될 수 있도록 허용합니다.
이번 결정은 책임이나 손해 배상 여부를 판단하지는 않지만, 메릴랜드 법에 따른 양도의 유효성을 확인함으로써 MSPR의 소송 입장을 크게 강화했습니다. 경영진은 소송 결과가 여전히 불확실하다고 경고하며 잠재적 회수액에 대한 수치적 지침은 제공하지 않았습니다. 관련 보도자료는 부록 99.1로 제출되었습니다.
재무제표나 수익 데이터는 제출되지 않아 즉각적인 재무상태표 영향은 평가할 수 없습니다. 그럼에도 이번 판결은 소송 합의나 판결로 인한 미래 현금 유입 가능성을 높이고 champerty(불법 중개) 사유로 인한 기각 위험을 줄일 수 있습니다.
Le 15 juillet 2025, MSP Recovery, Inc. (Nasdaq : MSPR) a déposé un 8-K pour divulguer un développement juridique important. La Cour suprême du Maryland a répondu à une question certifiée émanant du tribunal de district des États-Unis pour le district du Maryland et a statué que les cessions à l'origine de deux poursuites en cours ne sont pas champertous. Cette décision favorable supprime un obstacle procédural clé et permet à la société de poursuivre ses réclamations dans ces affaires.
La décision ne détermine pas la responsabilité ni les dommages-intérêts, mais renforce considérablement la position contentieuse de MSPR en confirmant la validité de ses cessions en vertu du droit du Maryland. La direction met en garde que les résultats des litiges restent incertains et n’a fourni aucune indication chiffrée sur les recouvrements potentiels. Un communiqué de presse lié a été déposé en annexe 99.1.
Aucun état financier ni donnée sur les résultats n’a accompagné le dépôt ; par conséquent, l’impact immédiat sur le bilan ne peut être évalué. Néanmoins, cette décision pourrait augmenter la probabilité de futurs flux de trésorerie issus de règlements ou de jugements, tout en réduisant le risque de rejet pour cause de champerty.
Am 15. Juli 2025 reichte MSP Recovery, Inc. (Nasdaq: MSPR) ein 8-K ein, um eine wesentliche rechtliche Entwicklung offenzulegen. Der Oberste Gerichtshof von Maryland beantwortete eine zertifizierte Frage des US-Bezirksgerichts für den District of Maryland und entschied, dass die Zuweisungen, die zwei anhängige Klagen untermauern, nicht champertous sind. Dieses positive Urteil beseitigt ein zentrales verfahrensrechtliches Hindernis und ermöglicht es dem Unternehmen, seine Ansprüche in diesen Fällen weiterzuverfolgen.
Die Entscheidung bestimmt nicht die Haftung oder Schadensersatz, stärkt jedoch die Prozessposition von MSPR erheblich, indem sie die Gültigkeit der Zuweisungen nach Maryland-Recht bestätigt. Das Management weist darauf hin, dass der Ausgang des Rechtsstreits weiterhin ungewiss ist und keine quantitativen Angaben zu möglichen Erträgen gemacht wurden. Eine zugehörige Pressemitteilung wurde als Anlage 99.1 eingereicht.
Es wurden keine Finanzberichte oder Gewinnzahlen beigefügt, daher kann eine unmittelbare Auswirkung auf die Bilanz nicht bewertet werden. Dennoch könnte das Urteil die Wahrscheinlichkeit künftiger Geldzuflüsse aus Prozessvergleichen oder Urteilen erhöhen und das Risiko einer Abweisung wegen Champerty verringern.
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☑ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
☐ |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
|
☑ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
☐ |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
|
☐ |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
|
|
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
☑ |
|
No fee required. |
|
|
|
☐ |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
☐ |
|
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
Table of Contents
2024 GHM GRAHAM CORPORATION 2024 Proxy Statement and Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders Building better companies
Table of Contents
Graham Corporation is a global leader in the design and manufacture of mission critical fluid, power, heat transfer and vacuum technologies for the Defense, Energy & Process, and Space industries. The Graham Manufacturing, Barber-Nichols, and P3 Technologies global brands are built upon world-renowned engineering expertise in vacuum, heat transfer, cryogenic pumps and turbomachinery technologies, as well as its responsive and flexible service and the unsurpassed quality customers have come to expect from our products and systems. Our core strengths include:
|
value-enhancing engineering sales and product development platform |
|
strong capabilities to handle complex, custom orders |
|
a responsive, flexible production environment |
|
capability to manage outsourced production |
|
robust technical support |
|
highly trained workforce |
|
capability to manufacture to tight tolerances |
Table of Contents
Notice of Annual Meeting
of Stockholders
|
|
|
Meeting Details: |
||||||||
Meeting Business The principal business of the 2025 Annual (1) Election of three director nominees; (2) To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers; (3) To ratify the appointment of Deloitte (4) To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual |
|
|
|
|
Date: Tuesday,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place: www.proxydocs.com/GHM In order to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, you must register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/GHM. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique link that will allow you access to the meeting and will also permit you to vote and submit questions at the meeting. There will not be a physical meeting location and you will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Time: 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Record Date: June 27, 2025
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 26, 2025: The Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and the Annual Report are available at www.proxydocs.com/GHM BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Christopher J. Thome Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Secretary |
Dated: July 15, 2025
Table of Contents
Vote Your Shares
How to Vote
Your vote is very important, and we hope that you will participate in the Annual Meeting. You are eligible to vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on June 27, 2025. In order to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, you must register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/GHM. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique link that will allow you access to the meeting. Please read the proxy statement and vote right away using any of the following methods.
Stockholders of Record:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Vote By Internet Before or During the Meeting Visit: www.proxypush.com/GHM and follow the instructions |
|
|
|
|
Vote By Telephone Call 1-866-256-0715 |
|
|
|
|
Vote By Mail Sign, date, and return your proxy card, if you received one, using the enclosed envelope |
|
Beneficial Stockholders:
If you are a beneficial stockholder, you will receive instructions from your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, nominee, custodian, fiduciary or other nominee that you must follow in order for your shares to be voted. Your broker may not vote your shares for director nominees or on the advisory vote on executive compensation unless you provide your broker with voting instructions.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Page |
PROXY STATEMENT |
|
General Information |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING |
|
3 |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
|
Board Recommendation |
|
7 |
|
Nominees Proposed for Election as Directors at the Annual Meeting |
|
7 |
|
|
Directors Whose Terms do not Expire at the Annual Meeting |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
|
Director Independence |
|
11 |
|
Board Leadership Structure |
|
11 |
|
|
Committees and Meetings of the Board; Meeting Attendance |
|
11 |
|
|
Corporate Governance Guidelines |
|
13 |
|
|
Insider Trading Policy |
|
13 |
|
|
Policies and Practices Related to the Grant of Certain Equity Awards |
|
13 |
|
|
Political Contribution Policy Statement |
|
14 |
|
|
Board Policy on Stockholder Rights Plans |
|
14 |
|
|
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight |
|
14 |
|
|
Communications from Stockholders and other Interested Parties |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MATTERS |
|
Commitment to Sustainability |
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
|
19 |
|
Risk Considerations in our Compensation Programs |
|
29 |
|
|
Fiscal Year 2025 Summary Compensation Table |
|
30 |
|
|
Fiscal Year 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards |
|
31 |
|
|
Employment Agreements |
|
31 |
|
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at March 31, 2025 |
|
33 |
|
|
Fiscal Year 2025 Stock Vested |
|
34 |
|
|
Pension Benefits at March 31, 2025 |
|
35 |
|
|
Fiscal Year 2026 Compensation |
|
36 |
|
|
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control |
|
37 |
|
|
Estimated Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control |
|
41 |
|
|
Pay Versus Performance |
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |
|
Director Compensation Programs |
|
45 |
|
Fiscal Year 2025 Director Compensation Table |
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
PROPOSAL TWO: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
|
Board Recommendation |
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
PROPOSAL THREE: Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
Board Recommendation |
|
48 |
|
Fees Paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE |
|
49 |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS |
|
Policies and Procedures for Review, Approval or Ratification of Related Person Transactions |
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
||
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS |
|
51 |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT |
|
52 |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
2026 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS |
|
Shareholder Proposals for Inclusion in the Proxy Materials for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders |
|
53 |
|
Shareholder Proposals for Consideration at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but not for Inclusion in the Proxy Materials |
|
53 |
|
|
Stockholder Nominations of Directors |
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
||
OTHER MATTERS |
|
54 |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
APPENDIX A - RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURE |
|
A-1 |
||
|
|
|
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this proxy statement contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are identified by words such as “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “opportunities,” “will,” “may,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “strives,” “continues,” “encourage,” and other similar words. All statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, including but not limited to our growth, diversification strategy, markets, returns and solutions, financial flexibility, and our ability to achieve our operating priorities are forward-looking statements and should be evaluated in light of important risk factors and uncertainties. These risk factors and uncertainties are more fully described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or should any of our underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those currently anticipated. In addition, undue reliance should not be placed on our forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and speak only as of the date made, and except as required by law, Graham Corporation disclaims any obligation to update or publicly announce any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein.
NOTE ABOUT OUR WEBSITES AND REPORTS: None of the statements on our websites or reports referenced or discussed in this proxy statement, are deemed to be part of, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement. The statements and reports may also change at any time and we undertake no obligation to update them, except as required by law. We have not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement the information included, or that can be accessed through, our website and you should not consider it to be part of this proxy statement.
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement Summary The Annual Meeting |
|
Proxy Statement Summary
To assist you in reviewing the proposals to be considered and voted upon at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held on August 26, 2025 (the “Annual Meeting”), we have summarized information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement or in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 (the “Annual Report”). This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider about Graham Corporation (the “Company”) and the proposals being submitted to stockholders at the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement and Annual Report carefully before voting.
The Annual Meeting
Date and Time: |
|
Tuesday, August 26, 2025, 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time |
Location: |
|
Online via: www.proxydocs.com/GHM |
Record Date: |
|
June 27, 2025 |
In order to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, you must register at www.proxydocs.com/GHM in advance. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique link that will allow you access to the meeting and will also permit you to vote and submit questions at the meeting. There will not be a physical meeting location and you will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.
Meeting Agenda and Voting Matters
Item |
|
Proposal |
|
Board Vote Recommendation |
|
Page Reference (for more information) |
1 |
|
Election of three director nominees named in this proxy statement |
|
FOR each nominee |
|
8 |
2 |
|
To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers |
|
FOR |
|
49 |
3 |
|
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026 |
|
FOR |
|
50 |
Directors and Nominees
Name |
|
Age |
|
Recent Professional Experience |
|
Board Committees |
James J. Barber, Ph.D.* |
|
71 |
|
Independent Consultant and Principal of Barber Advisors, LLC |
|
AC, CC**, NCGC |
Cari L. Jaroslawsky*◆
|
|
56 |
|
Founder and President of Compliance Right, LLC; Former Senior Vice President and General Manager of Eaton Mission Systems |
|
AC, NCGC** |
Matthew J. Malone◆ |
|
38 |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company |
|
— |
Jonathan W. Painter*◆
|
|
66 |
|
Lead Independent Director of the Company’s Board; Chair of Kadant Inc. |
|
AC, CC, NCGC |
Lisa M. Schnorr* |
|
59 |
|
Former Senior Vice President and Project Lead, Digital Enablement for Constellation Brands, Inc. |
|
AC**, CC |
Troy A. Stoner* |
|
61 |
|
Senior Director, Electronic & Intelligence Systems, Space Intelligence & Weapons Systems division of Boeing Defense, Space and Security |
|
CC, NCGC |
Daniel J. Thoren |
|
62 |
|
Executive Chairman of the Company |
|
— |
* — Independent Director
◆ — Director Nominee
** — Committee Chair
AC — Audit Committee
CC — Compensation Committee
NCGC — Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
1 |
Table of Contents
|
Proxy Statement Summary Our Business |
Our Business
We are a global leader in the design and manufacture of mission critical fluid, power, heat transfer and vacuum technologies for the Defense, Energy & Process, and Space industries. For the Defense industry, our equipment is used in nuclear and non-nuclear propulsion, power, fluid transfer, and thermal management systems. For the Energy & Process industries we supply equipment for vacuum, heat transfer, and fluid transfer applications used in oil refining, downstream chemical facilities, fertilizers, ethylene, methanol, edible oil, food & beverage, pulp & paper, and multiple alternative energy applications such as hydrogen, small modular nuclear, concentrated solar and geothermal processes. For the Space industry, our equipment is used in propulsion, power and thermal management systems, and for life support systems.
Our brands are built upon our engineering expertise and close customer collaboration to design, develop, and produce mission critical equipment and systems that enable our customers to meet their economic and operational objectives. Continual improvement of our processes and systems to ensure qualified and compliant equipment are hallmarks of our brands. Our early engagement with customers and support until the end of service life are values upon which our brands are built.
Director Skills and Attributes
We believe that our directors possess the requisite experience and skills necessary to carry out their duties and to serve our best interests and those of our stockholders.
2 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting |
|
Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting
Why am I receiving these proxy materials?
These proxy materials are being furnished to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors (the “Board”) for the Annual Meeting to be held on Tuesday, August 26, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Annual Meeting will be conducted as a virtual meeting of stockholders by means of a live audio-only webcast. We believe that hosting a virtual meeting will enable greater stockholder participation from any location. There will not be a physical meeting location and you will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.
We made our proxy materials available to stockholders via the Internet or in printed form if requested on or about July 15, 2025. Our proxy materials include the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”), the Notice of the Annual Meeting, this proxy statement and the Annual Report. If you requested and received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, our proxy materials also include the proxy card. These proxy materials, other than the proxy card, can be accessed at www.proxydocs.com/GHM.
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) e-proxy rules allow companies to post their proxy materials on the Internet and provide only a Notice of Internet Availability to stockholders as an alternative to mailing full sets of proxy materials except upon request. Similar to last year, we have elected to use this notice and access model. Unless you previously indicated your preference to receive paper copies of our proxy statement and Annual Report, you should have received a Notice of Internet Availability. The Notice of Internet Availability includes information on how to access our proxy materials on the Internet, how to vote and how to request a paper or email copy of the proxy materials at no extra charge this year or on an ongoing basis.
What am I voting on?
At the Annual Meeting, you will vote upon:
Will there be any other items of business addressed at the Annual Meeting?
As of the date of this proxy statement, we are not aware of any other matter to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that the holders of the proxies will act in accordance with their best judgment.
What must I do if I want to participate in the Annual Meeting?
You can participate in the Annual Meeting so long as you register in advance to virtually attend the Annual Meeting at www.proxydocs.com/GHM. You will be asked to provide the control number located inside the shaded gray box on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card. After completion of your registration, further instructions, including a unique link to access the Annual Meeting, will be emailed to you. Please be sure to follow the instructions found on your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card and/or voting instruction card and subsequent instructions that will be delivered to you via email.
By visiting www.proxydocs.com/GHM, pre-registering and then accessing the Annual Meeting as instructed, you will be able to participate in the Annual Meeting, vote your shares and ask questions during the meeting. However, if you do not comply with the procedures outlined above, you may not be admitted to the Annual Meeting.
As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting. This proxy statement furnishes you with the information you need in order to vote, whether or not you participate in the Annual Meeting.
Who may vote and how many shares can be cast?
If you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on June 27, 2025, which is the record date for the Annual Meeting, then you are entitled to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the record date, we had 10,975,874 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share is entitled to one vote on each proposal.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
3 |
Table of Contents
|
Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting |
How do I vote?
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If on the record date, your shares of our common stock were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, then you are a stockholder of record and your shares will be voted as you indicate. If you are a stockholder of record, there are four ways to vote:
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the meeting, we urge you to vote to ensure your vote is counted. You may still virtually attend and vote during the meeting if you have already voted by proxy. Only the latest vote you properly submit will be counted.
Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank. If on the record date, your shares of our common stock were held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer or other similar organization, which we collectively refer to as a broker, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being made available to you by that organization along with a voting instruction card. As a beneficial owner, you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker. Your broker has enclosed or otherwise provided a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker how to vote your shares. Your shares will be voted as you indicate. Check the voting instruction card used by that organization to see if it offers Internet or telephone voting.
If you hold your shares in street name, you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or nominee that you must follow in order to submit your voting instructions and have your shares voted at the Annual Meeting. If you want to vote in person virtually at the Annual Meeting, you must register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/GHM. You may be instructed to obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee and to submit a copy in advance of the meeting. Further instructions will be provided to you as part of your registration process.
Even if you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you submit your proxy or voting instructions in advance of the Annual Meeting as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend or are unable to attend the Annual Meeting.
What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?
If you are a stockholder of record and you indicate when voting over the Internet or by telephone that you wish to vote as recommended by our Board or sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, then the proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by our Board on all matters presented in this proxy statement and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.
For a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, if a proposal is deemed “routine” and you do not give instructions to your broker or nominee, they may, but are not required to, vote your shares with respect to the proposal. If the proposal is deemed “non-routine” and you do not give instructions to your broker or nominee, they may not vote your shares with respect to the proposal and the shares will be treated as broker non-votes. The determination of whether a proposal is “routine” or “non-routine” will be made by the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) based on NYSE rules that regulate member brokerage firms. When our inspector of election tabulates the votes for any particular matter, broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, but may not otherwise be counted. We therefore encourage you to provide voting instructions on each proposal to the organization that holds your shares.
What constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting?
A quorum is required for our stockholders to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. Pursuant to our Amended and Restated By-laws, as amended (the “By-laws”), the holders of record of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum. Abstentions, broker non-votes, and “withhold” votes for election of directors will be counted for the purpose of determining the existence of a quorum. If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned by the vote of a majority of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting until a quorum has been obtained.
4 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting |
|
What vote is required to approve each proposal and how does the Board recommend that I vote?
The vote required to approve each proposal, and the Board’s recommendation with respect to each proposal are described below:
Proposal Number |
|
Proposal |
|
Board |
|
Vote Required |
|
Effect of |
|
Effect of Broker |
One |
|
Election of the three director nominees identified in this proxy statement |
|
FOR each |
|
Plurality of the shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting(1) |
|
None |
|
None |
Two |
|
To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers |
|
FOR |
|
Majority of the votes cast on the proposal(2) |
|
None |
|
None |
Three |
|
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026 |
|
FOR |
|
Majority of the votes cast on the proposal(3) |
|
None |
|
N/A because this proposal is a matter on which brokers may vote |
How can I obtain a stockholder list?
A stockholder list will be available for examination by our stockholders during ordinary business hours throughout the ten-day period prior to the Annual Meeting at our principal executive offices at 20 Florence Avenue, Batavia, New York 14020, and during the meeting via the virtual meeting site, for any purpose germane to the meeting.
Can I change or revoke my vote?
Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy. However, if you are a stockholder of record you can change or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by:
Only your last, properly submitted, timely vote will count at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a street name holder, you must contact your broker to receive instructions as to how you may revoke your proxy instructions.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
5 |
Table of Contents
|
Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting |
We encourage you to vote in advance of the Annual Meeting to ensure your vote is counted should you be unable to participate in the Annual Meeting. Stockholders who have pre-registered to attend the Annual Meeting and who have not voted their shares prior to the Annual Meeting or who wish to change their vote will be able to vote their shares electronically at the Annual Meeting while the polls are open. If you properly provide your proxy in time to be voted at the Annual Meeting, it will be voted as you specify unless it is properly revoked prior thereto. If you properly provide your proxy but do not include your voting specifications, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board, as described in this proxy statement.
Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?
This proxy solicitation is made by our Board on our behalf, and we will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to solicitation by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies personally or by telephone or other means of communication. We will not compensate our directors, officers or employees for making proxy solicitations on our behalf. We will provide persons holding shares in their name or in the names of nominees, which in either case are beneficially owned by others, soliciting materials for delivery to those beneficial owners and will reimburse the record owners for their expenses in doing so.
Can I ask questions at the Annual Meeting?
If you registered in advance and attend the Annual Meeting, you may submit questions during the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to submit questions at www.proxydocs.com/GHM after logging in with your unique control number provided in connection with your pre-registration for the Annual Meeting.
We expect to respond to questions during the Annual Meeting that are pertinent to meeting matters as time permits. We may group together questions that are substantially similar to avoid repetition.
How can I find out the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. We will publish the voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which will be filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.
Where can I obtain additional information?
You can obtain, free of charge, a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 (“fiscal year 2025”) by:
You can also obtain a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and all other reports and information that we file with, or furnish to, the SEC from the SEC’s EDGAR database located at www.sec.gov.
6 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Proposal One: Election of Directors Nominees Proposed for Election as Directors at the Annual Meeting |
|
Proposal One:
Election of Directors
The Board currently consists of seven members. Our By-laws provide for a classified board of directors consisting of three classes of directors, with each class serving a staggered three-year term. As a result, stockholders elect only a portion of our Board each year. The terms of three of our directors, Cari L. Jaroslawsky, Matthew J. Malone and Jonathan W. Painter, will expire at the Annual Meeting.
Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has unanimously nominated Cari L. Jaroslawsky, Matthew J. Malone and Jonathan W. Painter for election as directors. If elected, each of Ms. Jaroslawsky and Messrs. Malone and Painter will hold office for a three-year term expiring in 2028 or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Our Board does not contemplate that any of the nominees will be unable to serve as a director, but if that contingency should occur before the proxies are voted, the designated proxies reserve the right to vote for such substitute nominee(s) as they, in their discretion, determine. Our By-laws do not permit re-election after a director reaches the age of 75.
Board Recommendation
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the election of each of Ms. Jaroslawsky, Mr. Malone and Mr. Painter as a director to serve for a three-year term expiring in 2028.
Nominees Proposed for Election as Directors at the Annual Meeting
|
|
|
|
Cari L. Jaroslawsky |
|
President of Compliance Right, LLC
AGE DIRECTOR SINCE 56 2022
TERM EXPIRES
2025
COMMITTEES
▶ Audit ▶ Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)
|
|
|
|
||
Ms. Jaroslawsky is the founder and President of Compliance Right, LLC, a board and executive consulting service provider formed in January 2022. Ms. Jaroslawsky served as the Senior Vice President and General Manager of Eaton Mission Systems, a leading aerospace and defense manufacturer and a division of Eaton Corporation plc (“Eaton”), from January 2019 until her retirement in December 2022, having previously served as Senior Vice President of Finance from October 2016 to December 2018 for Cobham International until it was acquired by Eaton. Prior to her position with Cobham International, Ms. Jaroslawsky served as the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Servotronics, Inc. (NYSE American: SVT), a designer and manufacturer of advanced technology and consumer products, from 2005 until 2016. Ms. Jaroslawsky is a certified public accountant. She also serves on the board of directors of Rand Capital Corporation (Nasdaq: RAND). |
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Qualifications |
|
||
|
|
||
Ms. Jaroslawsky brings to the Board substantial operational and leadership experience, defense industry knowledge and a significant background in accounting and financial matters, including through her prior service as the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of a publicly traded company.
|
|
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
7 |
Table of Contents
|
Proposal One: Election of Directors Nominees Proposed for Election as Directors at the Annual Meeting |
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Malone |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
AGE DIRECTOR SINCE 38 2025
TERM EXPIRES
2025
|
|
|
|
||
Mr. Malone was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a director in June 2025, having previously served as our President and Chief Operating Officer from February 2025 to June 2025 and our Vice President and General Manager – Barber-Nichols from June 2021 to February 2025. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Malone served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Barber-Nichols since May 2021, having previously served as Barber-Nichols Vice President of Operations from May 2020 to May 2021, Project Management Office Manager from November 2017 to May 2020, and Project Engineer from July 2015 to November 2017. Prior to Barber-Nichols, Mr. Malone began his career at GE Transportation where he held a variety of progressively challenging engineering and management positions. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Qualifications |
|
||
|
|
||
As our current President and Chief Executive Officer and given his extensive experience with Barber-Nichols, Mr. Malone provides the Board with valuable insight regarding the operations of our Company and our management team and he performs a critical role in the Board’s discussions regarding strategic planning and development. Our Board also benefits from Mr. Malone's leadership skills and experience at Barber-Nichols.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan W. Painter |
|
Lead Independent Director of the Company; Chair of Kadant Inc.
AGE DIRECTOR SINCE 66 2014
TERM EXPIRES
2025
COMMITTEES
▶ Audit ▶ Compensation ▶ Nominating and Corporate Governance |
|
|
|
||
Mr. Painter serves as our Lead Independent Director since June 2025, Chair since March 2022, and a director since 2014. Mr. Painter also serves as the Chair, since 2019, and a director since January 2010 of Kadant Inc. (NYSE: KAI), a leading global supplier of components and engineered systems used in process industries, including the pulp and paper industry. Mr. Painter served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Kadant from January 2010 to July 2019 and as President and Chief Operating Officer from September 2009 to December 2009. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Qualifications |
|
||
|
|
||
Mr. Painter brings valuable experience to the Board and management as a former executive officer of a public company that, similar to us, is in the business of designing, manufacturing and marketing specialized, engineered equipment. The Board believes that Mr. Painter’s diverse experience in operations, finance, mergers and acquisitions and corporate strategy enables him to provide critical insight to the Board and management that will help us to achieve our strategic goals.
|
|
8 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Proposal One: Election of Directors Directors Whose Terms do not Expire at the Annual Meeting |
|
Directors Whose Terms do not Expire at the Annual Meeting
|
|
|
|
James J. Barber, Ph.D. |
|
Independent Consultant and Principal of Barber Advisors, LLC
AGE DIRECTOR SINCE 71 2011
TERM EXPIRES
2026 COMMITTEES
▶ Audit ▶ Compensation (Chair) ▶ Nominating and Corporate Governance |
|
|
|
||
Dr. Barber is an independent consultant and the principal of Barber Advisors, LLC, a consulting firm advising businesses and non-profits in the areas of strategy, management, marketing and operations, since September 2007. From January 2000 to May 2007, Dr. Barber was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Metabolix, Inc. (formerly NASDAQ: MBLX). He was responsible for transforming Metabolix, Inc. from a research boutique into a leader in “clean tech” and industrial biotechnology.
Dr. Barber has served on the board of directors of Gevo, Inc. (Nasdaq: GEVO) since May 2025, where he serves on the audit committee. Dr. Barber served as the independent non-executive Chair of Itaconix plc (formerly Revolymer plc) (LON: ITX), a specialty chemicals company, from December 2018 to July 2022, and served as a non-executive director of Itaconix plc from September 2016 to November 2018. He has also served as a director of numerous private companies. Dr. Barber holds a National Association of Corporate Directors Directorship Certification. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Qualifications |
|
||
|
|
||
Dr. Barber brings to our Board substantial executive level leadership experience and a deep understanding of product and business development in highly technical industries and alternative energy markets. Dr. Barber also has significant experience in structuring both joint venture and acquisition transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troy A. Stoner |
|
Senior Director, Electronic & Intelligence Systems, Space Intelligence & Weapons Systems division of Boeing Defense, Space and Security
AGE DIRECTOR SINCE 61 2022
TERM EXPIRES
2026 COMMITTEES
▶ Compensation ▶ Nominating and Corporate Governance |
|
|
|
||
Mr. Stoner has served as the Senior Director, Electronic and Intelligence Systems for the Space Intelligence and Weapons Systems division of Boeing Defense, Space and Security since March 2025 and served as Director, Electronic Systems from June 2023 until March 2025. Mr. Stoner served as Chief Executive Officer of Argon ST, a specialist in systems engineering and a subsidiary of The Boeing Company from April 2020 until May 2023. Prior to that, Mr. Stoner served Boeing in a series of advancing roles including Senior Program Manager, Missions & Payloads, Autonomous Systems from December 2019 to March 2020, Senior Manager, Autonomous Systems, Boeing Strategy from November 2017 to November 2019, Senior Maritime Representative, Boeing Global Sales and Marketing, April 2016 to October 2017, and Senior Manager, Boeing Strategy from May 2015 to March 2016. Mr. Stoner retired from the U.S. Navy after 30 years of service. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Qualifications |
|
||
|
|
||
Mr. Stoner brings to the Board extensive business experience with strategy, leadership and operations at companies within the defense, space and security markets. Our Board and management team value his in-depth knowledge of the U.S. Navy as well as his extensive expertise in military defense systems and U.S. Navy planning and procurement processes.
|
|
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
9 |
Table of Contents
|
Proposal One: Election of Directors Directors Whose Terms do not Expire at the Annual Meeting |
|
|
|
|
Lisa M. Schnorr |
|
Former Senior Vice President and AGE DIRECTOR SINCE 59 2014
TERM EXPIRES
2027
COMMITTEES
▶ Audit (Chair) ▶ Compensation
|
|
|
|
||
Ms. Schnorr has served as a director since 2014. Before retiring in May 2021, she worked for Constellation Brands (NYSE: STZ), a Fortune 500 company and a leading international producer of beer, wine and spirits with operations in the U.S., Mexico, New Zealand and Italy. Ms. Schnorr joined Constellation Brands in 2004 and earned promotions through a series of positions with increasing responsibility, including Vice President of Compensation and HRIS (2011-2013), Senior Vice President of Total Rewards (2014-2015), Corporate Controller (2015-2017), Chief Financial Officer of the Wine & Spirits Division (2017-2019), and Senior Vice President and Project Lead of Digital Enablement (2019-2021). Before joining Constellation Brands, Ms. Schnorr held financial and accounting positions at various public and private companies and she began her career in 1987 at PricewaterhouseCoopers (formerly Price Waterhouse), all in Rochester, New York. Ms. Schnorr has been a member of the board of directors of Warrior Met Coal (NYSE: HCC), since August 2022 where she serves as Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Ms. Schnorr served as a member of the board of directors of Vintage Wine Estates (formerly Nasdaq: VWE) from June 2021 until February 2025 where she served as Chair of the Audit Committee. She holds a B.S. degree in Accounting from the State University of New York at Oswego. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Qualifications |
|
||
|
|
||
With her background and experience in strategic planning, audit, financial planning and analysis, capital allocation, public company governance and risk management, human resources and investor relations, Ms. Schnorr offers a global business and organizational perspective to the Board. The Board believes that Ms. Schnorr’s background and expertise enables her to guide us through a continued period of organic and acquisition-related growth and allows her to provide insight and leadership to our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel J. Thoren |
|
Executive Chairman of the Company AGE DIRECTOR SINCE 62 2021
TERM EXPIRES
2027
|
|
|
|
||
Mr. Thoren was appointed Executive Chairman in June 2025 and previously served as our Chief Executive Officer from September 2021 to June 2025 and became our President and Chief Operating Officer in June 2021. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Thoren had been employed by Barber-Nichols, LLC (“Barber-Nichols”), a premier supplier of specialty turbomachinery, pumps and electronic drives that address critical applications for the defense and aerospace/space industries, from 1991 until we acquired Barber-Nichols in June 2021, and served in progressively increasing roles, including his service as Barber-Nichols’ President and Chief Executive Officer from 1997 until May 2021 and its Chairman of the Board of Directors through June 2021. |
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Qualifications |
|
||
|
|
||
As our Executive Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer, and as a result of his day-to-day leadership of the business, Mr. Thoren provides the Board with valuable insight regarding the operations of our Company and our management team and he performs a critical role in the Board’s discussions regarding strategic planning and development. Our Board also benefits from Mr. Thoren’s proven strong leadership skills and experience at Barber-Nichols.
|
|
10 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Corporate Governance Director Independence |
|
Corporate Governance
Director Independence
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the independence standards of the NYSE govern the independence determinations for the members of our Board. The Board has affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Barber, Painter and Stoner, and Mses. Jaroslawsky and Schnorr is independent and has no material relationship with us as required by the independence standards of the NYSE. In addition, the Board has affirmatively determined that Mr. Fortier, whose service as a director ended at the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, was independent and had no material relationship with us as required by the independence standards of the NYSE during his service on the Board. Mr. Thoren, our Executive Chairman and employee and Mr. Malone, our President and Chief Executive Officer and employee, are not independent.
Board Leadership Structure
Mr. Thoren, our former Chief Executive Officer, serves as Executive Chairman. Mr. Painter, a non-executive independent director, serves as Lead Independent Director of the Board. Our Board believes that its leadership structure, with a non-executive Lead Independent Director position separate from our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, provides appropriate, independent oversight of management. The Executive Chairman presides at all meetings of the Board and stockholders; encourages and facilitates active participation of all directors; develops the calendar of and agendas for Board meetings in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer and other members of the Board; determines, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, the information that should be provided to the Board in advance of meetings; and performs any other duties requested by the Board from time to time. Additionally, the Executive Chairman assists the Chief Executive Officer with the development of a strategic plan, provides mentorship to the Chief Executive Officer, and provides assistance with risk management and business development. The Lead Independent Director presides during regularly held sessions with only the independent directors; serves as a liaison between the independent directors, the Executive Chairman and management and periodically meets with the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Committees and Meetings of the Board; Meeting Attendance
Our Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are set forth in their respective charters and are described below. The current charter of each committee is available on our website at www.grahamcorp.com under the heading “Investor Relations” and the subheading “Governance.”
The following table lists the current membership of the committees of the Board and the Chairs of each committee.
|
|
|
Committee Membership |
||||
Name |
|
|
Audit Committee |
|
Compensation Committee |
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
James J. Barber |
|
|
|
|
|||
Cari L. Jaroslawsky |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Jonathan W. Painter |
|
|
|
|
|||
Lisa M. Schnorr |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Troy A. Stoner |
|
|
|
|
|
= Chair
= Member
During fiscal year 2025, the Board met six times, the Audit Committee met four times, the Compensation Committee met six times, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times. During fiscal year 2025, each of our then serving directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served.
The non-management directors meet without members of management present during regularly scheduled executive sessions and at such other times as they deem necessary or appropriate. The Lead Independent Director of the Board presides over these executive sessions.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
11 |
Table of Contents
|
Corporate Governance Committees and Meetings of the Board; Meeting Attendance |
Our policy requires that each director attend our annual meeting of stockholders or provide the Executive Chairman of the Board with advance notice of the reason for not attending. All of our then serving directors attended our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, aside from Mr. Fortier, whose service as a director ended immediately following the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.
Audit Committee
We have a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Board has affirmatively determined that each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the independence standards of the NYSE applicable to audit committee members and applicable SEC rules. The Board has also determined that each of Mses. Jaroslawsky and Schnorr qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with applicable SEC rules based on their education and extensive professional work experience as described in each of their biographies under “Proposal One: Election of Directors.”
The Audit Committee reviews with Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, our financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, Deloitte & Touche LLP’s auditing procedures and fees, and the possible effects of professional services upon the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
The Audit Committee works closely with the Board, our executive management team and our independent registered public accounting firm to assist the Board in overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes and financial statement audits. In furtherance of these responsibilities, the Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of:
In addition, the Audit Committee’s responsibilities include reviewing and overseeing any transactions between us and any related person as defined by the SEC’s rules and discussing our guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee is also responsible for preparing the Audit Committee’s report that the SEC’s rules require to be included in our annual proxy statement, and performing such other tasks that are consistent with the Audit Committee’s charter. The Audit Committee’s report appears under the heading “Report of the Audit Committee.”
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates, interviews and nominates candidates for election to the Board and is responsible for oversight of our corporate governance practices.
When identifying director nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee solicits suggestions from incumbent directors, management and stockholders. In identifying and evaluating nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks candidates possessing the highest standards of personal and professional ethics and integrity; practical wisdom, independent thinking, maturity and the ability to exercise sound business judgment; skills, experience and demonstrated abilities that help meet the current needs of the Board; and a firm commitment to the interests of our stockholders. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not maintain a specific written diversity policy, it recognizes the value of diversity and seeks diverse candidates when possible and appropriate and considers diversity in its review of candidates.
In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into consideration such other factors as it deems appropriate. These factors may include knowledge of our industry and markets, experience with businesses and other organizations of comparable size, the interplay of the nominee’s experience with the experience of other members of the Board, and the extent to which the candidate would be a desirable addition to the Board and any of its committees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider, among other factors, experience or expertise in our industry, global business, science and technology, competitive positioning, corporate governance, risk management, finance or economics, and public affairs.
Stockholders entitled to vote in the election of directors at any annual meeting may recommend candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as potential nominees by submitting written recommendations to the attention of our Corporate Secretary at the following address: Graham Corporation, 20 Florence Avenue, Batavia, New York 14020. Stockholder recommendations must contain: (i) each candidate’s name, age, business and residence addresses; (ii) the candidate’s principal occupation or employment; (iii) each candidate’s written consent to serve as a director, if elected; (iv) whether each candidate would be an independent director if elected, and the basis therefore, under the NYSE listing standards; (v) a description of the candidate’s qualifications to be a director; and (vi) such other information regarding each candidate as would be required to be included in the proxy statement pursuant to the SEC’s rules. Any stockholder submitting a recommendation must provide his or her own name and address as they appear
12 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Corporate Governance Committees and Meetings of the Board; Meeting Attendance |
|
on our books and records, as well as the class and number of our shares owned of record and the date(s) he or she acquired such shares. In addition, any stockholder submitting a recommendation must provide (i) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each candidate and any other person pursuant to which the nominations were made; (ii) the identification of any person retained by the stockholder or by any candidate, or any person acting on his or her behalf to make solicitations for the purpose of electing such candidate and a brief description of the terms of such arrangement; (iii) a description of any arrangement, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss, manage risk or benefit from changes in the Company’s share price, or increase or decrease the voting power of the stockholder or beneficial owner with respect to the Company’s shares, and the stockholder’s agreement to notify the Company in writing within five business days after the record date for such meeting of any such arrangement in effect as of the record date for the meeting; and (iv) any such information regarding the stockholder as would be required to be included in a proxy statement or provided to the Company pursuant to the SEC’s rules. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate director candidates proposed by stockholders using the same criteria, and in the same manner, as described above for other potential nominees.
In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in its oversight of our strategies, policies and practices relating to environmental and social matters as well as executive officer succession. Annually, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts a performance evaluation of the Board and Board Committees operation and function and recommends any proposed changes to the Board for approval.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves salaries, incentive cash awards and other forms of compensation paid to our executive officers, reviews and approves the goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our executive officers, evaluates the performance of our executive officers, approves recipients of equity-based awards and establishes the number of shares and other terms applicable to such awards. The Compensation Committee also construes the provisions of and generally administers the 2020 Graham Corporation Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2020 Plan”), and any successor plan thereto. The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to its charter and may delegate its authority or responsibility to one or more subcommittees.
The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves the compensation paid to the Board. More information about the compensation of our directors is set forth under the heading “Director Compensation.”
In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis that is included in our annual proxy statement and performing such other tasks that are consistent with its charter.
The Compensation Committee recognizes the importance of using an independent consultant that provides services solely to the Compensation Committee and not to management. The Compensation Committee engaged an independent compensation consultant in fiscal year 2025. For more information on the role of the Compensation Committee in determining executive compensation, including its use of an independent consultant, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” under the heading “Executive Compensation.”
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to promote the effective functioning of the Board in its governance of our business and corporate operations. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at www.grahamcorp.com under the heading “Investor Relations” and the subheadings “Governance” and “Governance Documents.”
Insider Trading Policy
We have
Policies and Practices Related to the Grant of Certain Equity Awards
We have adopted a policy governing the grant of equity awards in order to create a framework for the consistent process for the granting of equity awards and to ensure the integrity and efficiency of our equity award process. Equity awards, including stock options, are granted in accordance with a predetermined schedule. Annual grants of equity awards, including stock options, to eligible recipients are made during the prescheduled Board and Board committee meetings held to approve the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Equity awards, including stock options, made in connection with a new hire or in connection with the promotion of or bonus award to an existing employee are granted at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Compensation Committee.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
13 |
Table of Contents
|
Corporate Governance Policies and Practices Related to the Grant of Certain Equity Awards |
Our Compensation Committee does not purposely accelerate or delay the public release of material information in order to allow the award recipient to benefit from a more favorable stock price. Management advises the Compensation Committee and the Board whenever it is aware that material non-public information is planned to be released to the public in close proximity to the grant date of any equity award, including stock options.
Political Contribution Policy Statement
The Board has adopted a political contribution policy statement, which outlines the Company’s policies, procedures and philosophy regarding its political contributions and activities. It is the Company’s policy not to make independent political expenditures in support of the election or defeat of particular candidates and not to maintain a political action committee. This policy is available on our website at www.grahamcorp.com under the heading “Investor Relations” and the subheadings “Governance” and “Governance Documents.”
Board Policy on Stockholder Rights Plans
We do not have a “poison pill” or stockholder rights plan. If we were to adopt a stockholder rights plan, the Board would seek prior stockholder approval of the plan unless, due to timing constraints or other reasons, a majority of independent directors of the Board determines that it would be in the best interests of stockholders to adopt a plan before obtaining stockholder approval. If a stockholder rights plan is adopted without prior stockholder approval, the Board will submit the plan for approval by stockholders prior to the first anniversary of the effective date of the plan or the plan will otherwise terminate.
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
The Board oversees our risk profile and management’s processes for managing risk, primarily through the Board’s committees. Our Audit Committee focuses on financial risks, including those that could arise from our accounting and financial reporting processes. Additionally, our Audit Committee monitors and directs the formal risk management projects implemented by management, including cybersecurity. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee focuses on the management of risks associated with board organization, membership and structure, corporate governance, and the recruitment and retention of talented Board members. Additionally, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee focuses on the management of risks associated with executive officer succession. Our Compensation Committee focuses on the management of risks that could arise from our compensation policies and programs and, in particular, our executive compensation programs and policies.
As part of its risk oversight responsibilities, the Board and its committees review the policies and processes that senior management uses to manage our risk exposure. In doing so, the Board and its committees review our overall risk function and senior management’s establishment of appropriate systems and processes for managing areas of material risk to the Company, including, but not limited to, operational, financial, legal, regulatory, strategic and information technology risks (including with respect to cybersecurity).
Communications from Stockholders and other Interested Parties
Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to contact the Board or an individual director, including the Lead Independent Director or independent directors as a group, should send their communications to the attention of the Corporate Secretary, Graham Corporation, 20 Florence Avenue, Batavia, New York 14020. The Corporate Secretary will forward all such communications as directed unless the communication is inappropriate.
14 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Environmental and Social Matters Commitment to Sustainability |
|
Environmental and Social Matters
Commitment to Sustainability
Oversight
Over the last few years, Graham Corporation has transformed from a highly cyclical, refinery and petrochemical equipment supplier into a well-diversifies, multi-market company providing full life cycle mission critical equipment to defend our nation, ensure sustainable energy supply and enable space commercialization. Graham Corporation is committed to embedding sustainability throughout our business. We believe that all our stakeholders must be considered in our everyday actions. We continue to enhance our sustainability strategy to align with the broader transformation of our business. Our executive management team recognizes the importance of embedding environmental and social priorities within our business operations and an enhanced and modernized strategy intended to drive additional progress on initiatives that promote sustainability and increase transparency. Mr. Malone, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is the lead officer responsible for overseeing and advancing the Company’ efforts with respect to sustainability initiatives. In such capacity, Mr. Malone reviews our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) efforts with the Board and the various Board committees as appropriate.
We have established ESG working groups at each of our companies that are responsible for leading our ESG strategy and monitoring our corporate social responsibility and environmental accountability initiatives. These groups include cross-functional subject matter experts from across the business. Against this backdrop, we have, with the assistance of outside expertise, performed an assessment of key indicators and engaged with our internal and external stakeholders on sustainability topics to help further inform our future direction and tenets. This ESG working group oversees Graham’s sustainability strategy and subsequent disclosures, including the production of our 2025 Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Factsheet available on our website. The four tenets of our ESG strategy are shown below:
|
|
|
|
Environment
We believe that a focus on environmental stewardship is fundamental and integral to the work we do every day to serve our customers, create value for our stockholders, and benefit our global community. We have taken steps at both our business units in Batavia, New York and Arvada, Colorado to improve energy efficiencies and air quality that are intended to lessen our impact on the environment. Notably:
We have over 630 employees across our global facilities, including our 43,000 square foot, state-of-the-art manufacturing plant that is part of the 101,000 square foot campus in Arvada, Colorado, where our commitment to reducing the waste we generate and utilizing our expertise to produce high quality and sustainable products. Each of our facilities are diligent in controlling hazardous waste and ensuring wastewater and storm sewer discharges are monitored to support greater access to clean water. Additionally, a key aspect of our ESG strategy is climate change. We help minimize our environmental footprint with Adopt-A-Street activities, factory recycling programs, electric car charging stations, and energy saving initiatives like LED lighting, motion sensors for lighting, smart compressors to manage energy loads and installing programmable thermostats in our facilities.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
15 |
Table of Contents
|
Environmental and Social Matters Commitment to Sustainability |
Our People
At Graham, we believe our most important asset is our people. We are committed to fostering and embracing a Graham community in which employees share a mutual understanding and respect for each other. Our pledge to diversity and equality encompasses our commitment to create a work environment which embraces inclusion. We continually strive to use our knowledge, talents, and resources to improve the quality of life of our workforce. In 2023, Barber-Nichols was recognized in Glassdoor’s Best Places to Work, ranking 10 out of 50 in the U.S. small and medium company category. Glassdoor’s analysis is based solely on the input of employees who complete an anonymous review about their job, work environment and employer.
Diversity, Equality & Inclusion (“DEI”) is very important to us at Graham. Our commitment starts with our goal of attracting, retaining, and developing a workforce that is diverse in background, knowledge, skill, and experience. In 2023, we started a Women in Manufacturing group to attract and promote women in our workplace. As of December 31, 2024, women represented approximately 21% and self-identified racial and ethnic minorities represented approximately 8% of our workforce, up from 5% as of March 31, 2022. We strive to have our diversity mirror our local communities through recruitment in our high schools and community colleges.
Our management recognizes that a diverse workforce and a culture of equity and inclusion helps us compete more effectively, sustain success, and build long-term shareholder value. We encourage every one of our team members to form deeper relationships with those around them based on mutual respect, dignity, and understanding. Furthermore, to encourage productive conversations within our organization, we continued to act on employee engagement survey results and rolled out a new Human Resource information system to provide easy access to pertinent information, as well as ensured training for our managers and employees while encouraging effective communication. Graham has non-discrimination and anti-harassment policies as outlined in our employee handbook, as well as a formal Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
We believe that employee development is vital to our continued success, and we support the development of our employees through programs such as our internal weld school training, our partnerships with community colleges, our tuition assistance program, and management and leadership training classes. Our management is continuously focused on developing an inclusive and respectful work environment where our employees are highly engaged and motivated.
We are dedicated to ensuring the health and safety of our team members by supporting the whole person. Our dedicated global health and safety function ensures that employees are trained on best practices to create a safe and healthy workplace for all. After an increase in our total recordable incident rate ("TRIR") metric in 2023, our safety and management teams took action to strengthen factory safety, resulting in a 43% reduction in our TRIR for 2024. Our TRIR is now back below the industry average. To ensure the health and well being of our employees, we aim to provide a robust health and wellness package. Some of the various benefits we offer include:
Our Communities
We believe that investing in local communities to create positive social and economic outcomes is at the heart of generating social impact. We believe in giving back to the communities in which we live and work. We support and empower our employees' efforts in their communities by providing opportunities to volunteer. Being a good company means that we push ourselves to do our best, for our customers, for our shareholders, for the Company, for ourselves, for those around us, and for the world that we all share. We are committed to supporting the communities in which we do business by leveraging the power of our company through donations, scholarships, education, and participation with charitable organization. Notably:
16 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Environmental and Social Matters Commitment to Sustainability |
|
We believe the industry needs to engage with young people, be more inclusive and employ people from a diverse range of backgrounds. As key stakeholders in the industry, we partnered with nonprofit organizations to implement elementary school Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (“STEM”) programs, where over 30 volunteers engaged in science fair judging, tours, and career fairs and created STEM kits to support educational endeavors. Furthermore, we facilitated welder training programs with local high schools and community colleges, and serve on their industry partner committees. Also, we assisted with college scholarship funds at many local colleges and universities, including Red Rocks Community College, Warren Tech, University of Colorado and Colorado State University.
We believe it is our responsibility to respect human rights in our operations, including, among other things, by opposing human trafficking and the exploitation of children. Accordingly, we have adopted a Human Rights Policy Statement to emphasize our strong commitment to human rights. As another part of being a good corporate citizen, we adopted a Conflict Minerals Policy that is intended to support our commitment to sourcing components and materials from companies that share our values around human rights and ethics. Both policies are available on our website at www.grahamcorp.com under the heading “Investor Relations” and the subheadings “Governance” and “Governance Documents.”
Corporate Governance
Graham is committed to achieving excellence in our corporate governance practices. We emphasize a culture of accountability and conduct our business in a manner that is fair, ethical, and responsible to earn the trust of our stakeholders. The Company has corporate governance and sustainability policies and structures in place to foster accountability and transparency. These policies reflect our underlying commitment to maintain the highest standards of ethics and integrity and to operate our business in compliance with all applicable anti-corruption, anti-bribery, and anti-trust laws and regulations.
The Board of Directors is comprised of a majority of independent directors as defined by the NYSE listing standards and the Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. All of the Board committees are comprised entirely of independent directors.
Graham recognizes that effectively managing enterprise risks is critically important to the long-term success of our business. Management is responsible for our company’s day-to-day risk management activities. Our company relies on a comprehensive risk management process to aggregate, monitor, measure, and manage risks. While we exercise oversight, we do not have full control over our supply chain nor the suppliers we do business with; however, we continually seek to partner with suppliers that share common values and a shared commitment to our ESG objectives.
As a global leader in the design and manufacture of mission critical fluid, power, heat transfer and vacuum technologies for the Defense, Energy & Process, and Space industries, Graham is a trusted partner that meets the industry’s high bar for data resiliency and security. We leverage the latest encryption configurations and technologies on our systems, devices, and third-party connections and further vet third-party vendors’ encryption, as required, through our vendor management process.
We routinely engage with our stakeholders to better understand their views on ESG matters, carefully considering the feedback we receive and acting when appropriate. For more information, please visit our website at www.grahamcorp.com under the heading “Investor Relations.”
To support our principles, we have adopted a Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation, Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy, in addition to the Human Rights Policy, Code of Vendor Conduct and Enterprise Level Environmental Policy, and our Conflict Minerals Policy, as further described below and are available on our website at www.grahamcorp.com under the heading “Investor Relations” and the subheadings “Governance” and “Governance Documents.”
Human Rights Policy
Our Human Rights Policy sets forth our views on the health and safety standards we strive to provide to our employees, our intolerance for forced or involuntary labor of any kind, and our commitment to providing equal opportunity in all aspects of employment. Human rights are generally defined as the basic freedoms believed to be inherent to all people as outlined in the United Nations Universal Declaration for Human Rights, which focuses on dignity, respect and equality, without discrimination.
Enterprise Level Environmental Policy
Our Enterprise Level Environmental Policy focuses on our belief that environmental stewardship is fundamental and integral to the work we do every day to serve our customers, create value for our stockholders, and benefit our global community. We believe that our focus on environmental sustainability, with the objective of reducing costs and improving sustainability of our operations, will provide us with a strategic benefit. Through our Enterprise Level Environmental Policy we will continue to engage with suppliers throughout our global value chain to manage these impacts in order to conserve resources, reduce costs, and promote ethical practices.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
17 |
Table of Contents
|
Environmental and Social Matters Commitment to Sustainability |
Conflict Minerals Policy
Our Conflict Minerals Policy outlines our commitment to sourcing components and materials from companies that share our values around human rights and ethics. We strive to utilize suppliers with products that are conflict free. We undertake due diligence processes to support our efforts and expect our suppliers to source products and develop reasonable due diligence frameworks and policies designed to prevent conflict minerals from being included in our products. We encourage our employees, vendors, or other partners to notify us of any issues or concerns regarding our supply chain, including issues and concerns relating to conflict minerals.
Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy
Our Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy sets forth our commitment to ensuring that our employees, affiliates, and others acting on our behalf abide by all international and local laws that collectively prohibit bribery and corruption in countries where we conduct business. We prohibit any form of bribery or corruption, including giving, offering, promising or receiving Anything of Value (as defined in the Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy), directly or indirectly with the intent to obtain an improper business advantage.
Code of Vendor Conduct
Our Code of Vendor Conduct specifies the behaviors, practices and regulations we expect to see practiced in all stages of our supply chain. The Code of Vendor Conduct is focused on ensuring that our vendors, suppliers, and other business partners, including their employees, agents, and suppliers, act in a way that is ethical, corporately responsible, and aims to promote compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
Executive Officers
As of June 27, 2025, we were served by the following executive officers and Section 16 officers, each of whom was appointed by the Board:
Matthew J. Malone, age 38, became our President and Chief Executive Officer in June 2025, having previously served as our President and Chief Operating Officer from February 2025 to June 2025 and our Vice President and General Manager – Barber-Nichols from June 2021 to February 2025. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Malone served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Barber-Nichols since May 2021, having previously served as Barber-Nichols Vice President of Operations from May 2020 to May 2021, Project Management Office Manager from November 2017 to May 2020, and Project Engineer from July 2015 to November 2017. Further information about Mr. Malone is set forth under “Proposal One: Election of Directors.”
Daniel J. Thoren, age 62, has served as our Executive Chairman since June 2025, having previously served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from September 2021 to June 2025 and our President and Chief Operating Officer from June 2021 to September 2021. Further information about Mr. Thoren is set forth under “Proposal One: Election of Directors.”
Christopher J. Thome, age 54, became our Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in April 2022 and our Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Secretary in July 2022. Prior to joining the Company since February 2020, Mr. Thome served as Corporate Controller and Treasurer of Allient Inc. (NASDAQ: ALNT), formerly known as Allied Motion Technologies Inc., a producer of precision and specialty motion, control and power quality components and systems. From July 2006 to February 2020, he held progressively advancing roles at Integer Holdings Corporation (NYSE: ITGR), a provider of advanced medical device outsourcing, including Senior Director–Treasurer and Senior Director–Financial Reporting, Treasury Operations and Shared Services. Mr. Thome is a certified public accountant and began his career with PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Alan E. Smith, age 58, became our Vice President and General Manager – Batavia in July 2015. Mr. Smith served as our Vice President of Operations from July 2007 until July 2015. Previously, from 2005 until July 2007, Mr. Smith served as Director of Operations for Lydall, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of specialty engineering products. Prior to that, he had been employed by us for fourteen years, progressing from Project Engineer to Engineering Manager.
Michael E. Dixon, age 44, became our Vice President and General Manager – Barber-Nichols in June 2025, having previously served as General Manager – Barber-Nichols from February 2025 to June 2025, Director of Sales and Marketing from September 2022 to February 2025, Sales Engineering Manager from July 2021 to September 2022 and Sales Engineer from October 2018 to July 2021. Prior to this, Mr. Dixon served as Application Engineer from January 2013 to December 2017 and Application Engineering Manager from December 2017 to October 2018 at Sundyne. Mr. Dixon began his career at ESS Metron, where he served as Product Manager – Packaged Pumping Systems from May 2011 to December 2012.
18 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
|
Executive Compensation
As a smaller reporting company under the Exchange Act we are not required to provide certain disclosures pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, however, we have elected not to take advantage of certain scaled disclosure requirements allowed for smaller reporting companies to provide transparency with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides information about the compensation programs for our executive officers named in the fiscal year 2025 Summary Compensation Table. These named executive officers and their respective titles are:
This CD&A includes the philosophy and objectives of the Compensation Committee of our Board, descriptions of each of the elements of our executive compensation programs, and the basis for the compensation decisions we made during fiscal year 2025.
Executive Summary
Fiscal Year 2025 Results
The Compensation Committee’s philosophy focuses on aligning the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders by rewarding performance that enhances the objective of increasing both current and long-term stockholder value. Our executive compensation programs are designed to provide a strong link between the amounts earned by our named executive officers and Company and individual performance.
During fiscal year 2025, our named executive officers continued to implement our strategic plan to diversify, increase productivity, improve processes, and grow our market share and profits in our existing businesses.
Our financial results for fiscal year 2025 included the following:
Management Transition
On February 5, 2025, we appointed Mr. Malone as our President and Chief Operating Officer and Michael Dixon as our General Manager of Barber-Nichols. In connection with his appointment as President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Malone’s annual base salary was increased to $400,000. In connection with his appointment as General Manager of Barber-Nichols, Mr. Dixon’s annual base salary was increased to $275,000. On June 10, 2025, we appointed Mr. Malone as our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Thoren as our Executive Chairman and Mr. Dixon as our Vice President and General Manager of Barber-Nichols. In connection with these changes the annual base salaries for Messrs. Malone, Thoren and Dixon were changed to $480,000, $250,000 and $300,000, respectively. For fiscal 2026, the target annual cash incentive for Messrs. Malone, Thoren and Dixon was set at 100%, 50% and 50% of base salary, respectively. For fiscal 2026, the target annual long-term incentive compensation for Mr. Malone was set at 125% of base salary and 50% of base salary for Messrs. Thoren and Dixon.
We entered into amended and restated employment agreement with Messrs. Thoren and Malone in connection with these changes. For more information on Messrs. Thoren’s and Malone’s amended and restated employment agreements, please see the section entitled “Employment Agreements” below.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
19 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Our “Pay for Performance” Philosophy
Our executive compensation programs contain key components and features that reinforce our “pay for performance” philosophy. For example:
Principles and Objectives
In establishing executive compensation, the guiding principles and objectives of the Compensation Committee are as follows:
The Compensation Committee reviews the market median and also considers measures of Company and industry performance when determining named executive officer compensation, including revenue, bookings, adjusted EBITDA, and return on invested capital (“ROIC”). ROIC is defined as a return on invested capital and is calculated by dividing net operating profit after taxes by the total invested capital. As described further below under the heading “Use of Peer Group Compensation Data and Tally Sheets,” from time to time, but at a minimum every three years, the Compensation Committee reviews data on the executive compensation programs of other comparably-sized companies both within our industry and in our geographic region as part of the process of establishing and maintaining our executive compensation programs.
We designed our executive compensation programs to reward our named executive officers for Company and individual performance that maximizes stockholder value. We describe the Company and individual performance measures that the Compensation Committee takes into account in determining cash and equity-based incentive awards for our named executive officers below under the headings “Annual Cash Incentive Compensation” and “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation,” respectively.
How We Make Compensation Decisions
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee designs and implements compensation programs that further the intent and purpose of our fundamental compensation philosophy, principles, and objectives. The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting appropriate compensation levels for our named executive officers, and determines base salary, as well as cash and equity-based incentive awards for each of our named executive officers. We provide additional information about the Compensation Committee under the heading “Corporate Governance.”
20 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
|
Role of Named Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions
Within the framework of the executive compensation programs approved by the Compensation Committee and based on management’s review of market competitive positions, our Chief Executive Officer annually reviews the performance of our other named executive officers and presents such performance information to the Compensation Committee. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the salary, cash incentive and equity-based incentive compensation paid to our other named executive officers. The Compensation Committee considers such performance information in determining each element of compensation for the other named executive officers. The Compensation Committee uses its discretion to determine whether to accept, reject or modify any adjustments to awards that may be recommended by our Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and meets in executive session, outside the presence of our Chief Executive Officer, when determining his compensation.
On an annual basis, our Chief Executive Officer also approves and recommends to the Compensation Committee the individual objectives for our other named executive officers under the Stock Bonus Plan and Cash Bonus Program. The Compensation Committee approves the individual objectives for our Chief Executive Officer.
Use of Outside Consultants by the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee believes that it benefits from external advice and assistance to help meet its objectives and fulfill its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee periodically engages outside consultants to educate and inform Committee members with regard to compensation matters, including the advantages and disadvantages of existing and proposed compensation programs, and keeps the Compensation Committee abreast of current and emerging compensation trends both within our industry and for companies of similar size and stature. These consultants also may advise the Compensation Committee with respect to various compensation alternatives, provide the Compensation Committee with relevant market compensation data and assist the Compensation Committee in analyzing such data when making compensation decisions.
During fiscal year 2025, the Compensation Committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“F.W. Cook”) to assist the Compensation Committee in analyzing the competitiveness of the salary levels for our named executive officers.
Use of Peer Group Compensation Data and Tally Sheets
Peer Group Compensation Data. When making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee may consider executive compensation programs and individual elements of compensation paid to other named executive officers at a group of comparably-sized companies both within our industry and in our geographic region or which we otherwise consider to be our peers. When selecting our peer group shown below, the Compensation Committee considered the companies’ revenue, market capitalization, number of employees, and industry classification.
Allient, Inc. |
|
Energy Recovery, Inc. |
|
Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. |
Astronics Corporation |
|
Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. |
|
SIFCO Industries, Inc. |
CECO Environmental Corp. |
|
Hurco Companies, Inc. |
|
The Eastern Company |
CPI Aerostructures, Inc. |
|
Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. |
|
The Gorman-Rupp Company |
DMC Global, Inc. |
|
Park Aerospace Corp. |
|
Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. |
The Compensation Committee may use peer group compensation data to provide an informational perspective on our compensation practices, levels of base salary, and the design of annual cash and long-term equity incentive compensation programs and the overall competitiveness of our compensation program.
Tally Sheets. The Compensation Committee analyzes tally sheets prepared for each named executive officer as part of its responsibilities for our executive compensation programs. Tally sheets present the dollar amount of each component of compensation for each named executive officer. The purpose of tally sheets is to bring together, in summary form, all of the elements of total direct compensation for our named executive officers so that the Compensation Committee may analyze both the individual elements of compensation (including the weighting of each element as compared to each other element) and the aggregate amount of total direct compensation. During fiscal year 2025, the Compensation Committee used tally sheets to assist in its review of the compensation of our named executive officers. No compensation changes were made with respect to fiscal year 2025 compensation based on those tally sheet reviews.
Executive Compensation Components
As discussed in greater detail below, our compensation philosophy focuses on aligning the total direct compensation of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders by rewarding performance that enhances the objective of increasing both current
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
21 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
and long-term stockholder value. We use the term “total direct compensation” to refer to the sum of base salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation.
Total Direct Compensation |
|
= |
|
Base Salary |
|
+ |
|
Annual Incentive Compensation |
|
+ |
|
Long-Term Incentive Compensation |
The components of total direct compensation granted during fiscal year 2025 were:
Compensation Element |
|
Form of Compensation |
|
Purpose |
|
Performance Criteria |
Base Salary |
|
Cash |
|
Provide compensation that is not “at-risk” to compensate our named executive officers for services rendered during the fiscal year |
|
Not performance based |
Annual Incentive Compensation |
|
Cash |
|
Motivate our named executive officers to attain strategic short-term Company and individual objectives |
|
Adjusted EBITDA, bookings and individual officer goals linked to achievement of Company strategic objectives |
Long-term Incentive Compensation |
|
PSUs |
|
Incentivize our named executive officers to focus on Company growth and profitability, align their compensation with our business strategy, and create value for our stockholders |
|
50% three-year cumulative revenue metric and 50% three-year adjusted ROIC metric |
|
|
RSUs |
|
Encourage retention of our named executive officers over a three-year period |
|
Not performance based |
The Compensation Committee seeks to align the annual and long-term compensation elements of our named executive officer compensation to our strategic plan. We strive to strike a balance between establishing incentives that motivate our named executive officers to achieve meaningful results, while ensuring that we sufficiently recognize our named executive officers for achieving results that are within their control. The Compensation Committee believes that the diversity of the selected forms of compensation and performance metrics help to manage the pay for performance challenges presented by our business while creating the proper focus among our named executive officers to facilitate our growth.
We establish each element that comprises targeted total direct compensation for the named executive officers annually. We do not have a specific policy for the allocation of compensation between short-term and long-term compensation or cash and equity compensation, as the allocation of these items is primarily driven by market compensation information and Company performance and goals.
We generally do not consider gains realized from prior compensation, such as stock option exercises, restricted stock vesting and vesting of RSUs or PSUs, in setting other elements of compensation. We believe that reducing or limiting awards because of prior gains realized by a named executive officer would unfairly penalize the officer for outstanding past performance and reduce the motivation for continued outstanding achievement. Similarly, our severance and change-in-control arrangements, which we discuss in detail under the heading “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control,” do not affect our decisions regarding other elements of compensation. Those arrangements serve specific purposes that are unrelated to the determination of a named executive officer’s compensation for a specific year.
In support of our compensation philosophy, our executive compensation is heavily weighted toward incentive (variable) compensation, and the proportion of variable, or “at risk,” compensation increases as the level of responsibility increases. As shown below, in fiscal year 2025, we provided 67% of Mr. Thoren's, our Chief Executive Officer for the period, target compensation through annual and long-term incentive compensation, and, on average, we provided 50% of our other named executive officers’ target compensation through annual and long-term incentive compensation.
Beginning in fiscal year 2023, our Compensation Committee grants awards consisting of RSUs and PSUs. We believe the use of such awards supports our long-term compensation philosophy as well as emphasizes performance and alignment of executives’ interests with our stockholders. The Compensation Committee will continue to review our executive compensation programs, as well as consider the outcome of the “say-on-pay” votes when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers.
22 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
|
Fiscal Year 2025 Total Target Compensation*
* The fair market value of the RSUs and PSUs are based upon the closing price at the date of grant. Information is presented for fiscal year 2025.
We also provide compensation and benefits to our named executive officers through the following programs:
Compensation Element |
|
Form of Compensation |
|
Purpose |
Health and welfare plans |
|
Eligibility to receive health and other welfare benefits paid for by the Company, including life insurance, short-term and long-term disability insurance, and a comprehensive medical, dental and vision plan |
|
Provide a competitive employee benefits program |
Retirement benefits |
|
Named executive officers hired prior to January 1, 2003, limited to Mr. Smith, participate in a qualified defined benefit pension plan, a qualified defined contribution plan, and a non-qualified supplemental retirement plan. Named executive officers hired on or after January 1, 2003, including Messrs. Thoren, Thome, and Malone, participate only in the qualified defined contribution plan and receive an additional Company contribution under such plan in lieu of their participation in the defined benefit pension plan |
|
Provide an incentive for long-term retention of our named executive officers |
Limited perquisites and other personal benefits |
|
A $5,000 allowance for our Chief Executive Officer ($2,500 for our other named executive officers) to purchase term life insurance |
|
Provide a competitive compensation package, facilitate strong, focused performance and better enable us to attract and retain superior employees for key positions |
Stockholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
At our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in our 2024 proxy statement, referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote. Approximately 99% of the votes cast were voted in favor of the compensation of our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee evaluated the positive results of the 2024 “say-on-pay” vote as well as the other factors discussed in this CD&A. Each of these factors were considered by the Compensation Committee to determine our named executive officer compensation programs.
At our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders expressed a preference that the “say-on-pay” vote take place on an annual basis. This preference was subsequently adopted by our Board, and so we are providing our stockholders with a “say-on-pay” vote this year. See “Proposal Two: Advisory Vote on the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers.”
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
23 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Annual Base Salaries
The Compensation Committee reviews base salaries for each of our named executive officers at least annually. In general, the Compensation Committee sets base salaries based on factors including Company and individual performance, job responsibilities, internal pay equity and base salary levels of similar positions in our peer group.
Effective as of April 1, 2025, the Board approved the following changes to the annual base salary rates of our named executive officers:
Mr. Malone's annual base salary changed to $400,000 effective February 5, 2025 in connection with his appointment as our President and Chief Operating Officer and was later increased to $480,000 on June 10, 2025 in connection with his appointment as our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Thoren’s annual base salary was changed to $250,000 on June 10, 2025 in connection with his appointment as our Executive Chairman.
Annual Cash Incentive Compensation
Our Annual Executive Cash Bonus Program, which we refer to as the Cash Bonus Program, is designed to compensate our named executive officers for above-average performance through an annual cash incentive award related both to Company and individual performance. We instituted the Cash Bonus Program to effectively align short-term individual performance with Company performance.
The Compensation Committee designed the Cash Bonus Program to provide a clear link between the named executive officers’ goals and our performance and business objectives. In fiscal year 2025, the Compensation Committee used a combination of consolidated adjusted EBITDA or divisional adjusted EBITDA, consolidated bookings or divisional bookings, and personal objectives as the performance metrics to evaluate our named executive officers’ performance under the Cash Bonus Program. The consolidated adjusted EBITDA and divisional adjusted EBITDA performance metrics are based on 2025 fiscal year-end results. Consolidated bookings and divisional bookings represent new orders received by us (or the applicable division) and entered into backlog during fiscal year 2025, reduced by the impact of any backlog cancellations. Consolidated bookings include consolidated net orders for Graham Mfg., Barber-Nichols, P3 Technologies, LLC ("P3"), Ahmedabad, India, and Suzhou, PRC. The Compensation Committee selected consolidated adjusted EBITDA/divisional adjusted EBITDA and consolidated bookings/divisional bookings as the quantitative measures of short-term performance because it believes that these metrics impact our annual profitability and future growth.
For fiscal year 2025, the Compensation Committee established personal goals for our named executive officers, which included the following:
The Compensation Committee assigned the weightings applicable to the three metrics to align our named executive officers’ goals with our current business objectives as follows:
Metric |
|
Weighting |
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA/Divisional Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
|
50% |
Bookings(2) |
|
20% |
Personal goals |
|
30% |
24 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
|
The Compensation Committee typically establishes the goals for the Cash Bonus Program during our annual budgeting process following the commencement of the fiscal year. The Compensation Committee typically approves such goals during our first quarter, subject to the ratification of the Board. The Compensation Committee approves the personal goals for our Chief Executive Officer. Our Chief Executive Officer develops the personal goals for our other named executive officers in alignment with our corporate strategy and recommends these goals to our Compensation Committee Chair for approval.
For fiscal year 2025, the Compensation Committee set target bonus levels as follows: Mr. Thoren – 100% of base salary; and Messrs. Thome, Smith and Malone – 50% of base salary. Mr. Malone’s bonus was based on the total salary received during fiscal 2025, which was comprised of the salary he received while acting as General Manager of Berber-Nichols and the prorated salary for the time he served as Chief Operating Officer. The Compensation Committee uses a stretch maximum payout level to better incentivize and reward above target performance. Each named executive officer may receive anywhere from 0% to 200% of his target bonus level depending on the attainment of objectives, as follows:
Target Level |
|
Consolidated Adjusted |
|
Consolidated Bookings/ Divisional Bookings |
Threshold |
|
50% |
|
50% |
Target |
|
100% |
|
100% |
Maximum |
|
200% |
|
200% |
We use linear interpolation to determine the percentage of the target bonus payable based on performance in between threshold and target or target and maximum. The Compensation Committee may consider extraordinary events that either positively or negatively affect financial performance, and may in its discretion, include or exclude the impact of these events in approving awards under the Cash Bonus Program. During fiscal year 2025, the Compensation Committee exercised this discretion and adjusted EBITDA to add back ERP implementation costs, acquisition related costs, Barber-Nichols supplemental bonus costs and equity based compensation as applicable.
For fiscal year 2025, threshold, target, maximum, and actual quantitative performance metrics used under the Cash Bonus Program for our named executive officers were as follows ($ in millions):
Performance Measure |
|
Threshold |
|
|
Target |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Actual |
|
||||
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
|
18.9 |
|
25.3 |
|
37.9 |
|
26.7 |
||||||||
Consolidated Bookings |
|
187.2 |
|
234.0 |
|
280.8 |
|
231.1 |
||||||||
Divisional Adjusted EBITDA - Graham Manufacturing |
|
9.4 |
|
12.5 |
|
18.8 |
|
19.3 |
||||||||
Divisional Bookings - Graham Manufacturing |
|
104.8 |
|
131.0 |
|
157.2 |
|
82.2 |
||||||||
Divisional Adjusted EBITDA - Barber-Nichols/P3 |
|
13.8 |
|
18.4 |
|
27.6 |
|
13.8 |
||||||||
Divisional Bookings - Barber-Nichols/P3 |
|
82.4 |
|
103.0 |
|
123.6 |
|
148.9 |
At its June 2, 2025 meeting, the Compensation Committee reviewed the achievement of Company and individual objectives during fiscal year 2025 and approved the award of cash incentive compensation under the Cash Bonus Program for each named executive officer. Based on our performance during fiscal year 2025, the Compensation Committee determined that the consolidated adjusted EBITDA achieved was above the target level but below the maximum level for the consolidated adjusted EBITDA component; the consolidated bookings achieved was below the target level but above the threshold level for the consolidated bookings component; the divisional adjusted EBITDA – Graham Manufacturing achieved was above the maximum level for the divisional adjusted EBITDA – Graham Manufacturing component; the divisional bookings – Graham Manufacturing achieved was below the threshold level for the divisional bookings – Graham Manufacturing component; the divisional adjusted EBITDA – Barber-Nichols/P3 achieved was at the threshold level for the divisional adjusted EBITDA – Barber-Nichols/P3 component; and the divisional bookings – Barber-Nichols/P3 achieved was above the maximum level for the divisional bookings – Barber-Nichols/P3 component of the Cash Bonus Program. Because the divisional adjusted EBITDA - Barber-Nichols/P3 component was approximately 0.1% below the threshold level, the Compensation Committee used its discretion to award at the threshold level for the divisional EBITDA - Barber-Nichols/P3 component. The Compensation Committee determined that each of our named executive officers, achieved the following percentages of their respective target personal goals: Mr. Thoren – 65%; Mr. Thome – 130%; Mr. Smith –
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
25 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
78%; and Mr. Malone – 155%. Based on these results and achievements, the cash incentive compensation earned under the Cash Bonus Program for our named executive officers for fiscal year 2025 was as follows:
Named Executive Officer |
|
Bonus |
|
Percent of |
|
Percent of |
Daniel J. Thoren |
|
$471,000 |
|
94% |
|
47% |
Christopher J. Thome |
|
$204,660 |
|
114% |
|
57% |
Alan E. Smith |
|
$190,839 |
|
116% |
|
58% |
Matthew J. Malone |
|
$195,450 |
|
114% |
|
57% |
The Compensation Committee sets what it believes are challenging goals for maximum bonus awards and expects that maximum bonus awards will be made only in extraordinary circumstances.
The amount of these cash awards earned by each named executive officer in fiscal year 2025 is shown in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Fiscal Year 2025 Summary Compensation Table.
Under the Cash Bonus Program, special awards may be made to a named executive officer who has made an extraordinary contribution to us during the fiscal year. Such awards are generally recommended in writing by our Chief Executive Officer to the Chair of the Compensation Committee and approved by the Compensation Committee before grant. The Compensation Committee did not approve any such awards in fiscal year 2025.
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation
The Compensation Committee designed our Stock-Based Long-Term Incentive Award Plan for Senior Executives, which we refer to as the Stock Bonus Plan, to motivate our named executive officers to increase stockholder value by providing them with long-term stock-based awards for above-average Company performance. Our long-term incentive opportunities are intended to be competitive with the long-term incentive opportunities offered by the companies constituting our peer group. We issue awards pursuant to our 2020 Plan, a comprehensive executive compensation plan that provides for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, PSUs and other stock-related awards, as well as other awards that may be settled in cash or other property. All of our named executive officers currently employed by us are eligible to participate in the 2020 Plan.
The Compensation Committee designed the Stock Bonus Plan to create a tight link between the named executive officers’ stock-based compensation and the Company’s performance and business objectives. In fiscal year 2025, the Compensation Committee granted half of the awards in the form of RSUs, and the other half in the form of PSUs.
RSUs. We granted RSUs because we believe that RSUs help us retain our named executive officers by offering our named executive officers the opportunity to receive shares of our common stock if they continue to be employed by us on the date the RSUs vest. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, shares granted vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to the named executive officer’s continued employment at each such date.
PSUs. We granted PSUs because we believe that PSUs help us reward our named executive officers by conditioning the receipt of shares of our common stock upon the satisfaction of longer-term predetermined Company objectives. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, the PSUs vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to satisfaction of the performance metrics for the applicable three-year period and subject to continued employment through the third anniversary of the date of grant. The Compensation Committee typically approves the performance metrics and the other terms of the PSUs during our first quarter.
For fiscal year 2025 grants, the performance metrics applicable to the PSUs are 50% based upon the Company’s three-year cumulative revenue metric with linear interpolation applied between points and no payout if the results are below threshold and 50% based upon the Company three-year average ROIC change (compared to the ROIC for fiscal 2024) with linear interpolation applied between points and no payout if the results are below 0 basis points . With respect to these grants, the Compensation Committee may consider extraordinary events that either positively or negatively affect the performance metrics, and may in its discretion, include or exclude the impact of these events.
The Compensation Committee determines the number of RSUs and PSUs to award to our named executive officers based on a percentage of each named executive officer’s annual base salary. The Compensation Committee determined the number of RSUs and PSUs to award to our named executive officers by using each such officer’s Long-Term Incentive Percentage of Base Salary, which we refer to as the L-T Percentage. For fiscal year 2025, the L-T Percentage in effect for each of our named executive officers was as follows: Mr. Thoren – 170%; Mr. Thome - 70%; and Messrs. Smith and Malone – 60%.
The number of RSUs awarded was determined by multiplying 50% of each named executive officer’s base salary in effect on the date of grant by such officer’s L-T Percentage, and then dividing the product by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. The number of PSUs was determined by multiplying 50% of each named executive officer’s base salary in effect on the
26 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
|
date of grant by such officer’s L-T Percentage, and then dividing the product by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. The closing price of our common stock was $25.56 on June 4, 2024, the date of grant.
The Compensation Committee seeks to establish performance goals that are challenging but attainable based on our three-year business and financial plan for the year. When establishing performance goals, the Compensation Committee reviews and discusses our business and financial plans for that year and the opportunity to generate stockholder value. The Compensation Committee establishes a range of performance goals for the performance period as well as payment thresholds, targets and maximums for each goal.
Additional information regarding the awards granted to each named executive officer in fiscal year 2025 is set forth in the Fiscal Year 2025 Summary Compensation Table and the Fiscal Year 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026 (“fiscal year 2026"), the L-T Percentage approved for each of our named executive officers was as follows and reflects the promotion of Mr. Malone to President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Thoren's appointment as our Executive Chair: Mr. Malone – 125%; Mr. Thoren – 50%; Mr. Thome - 70%; and Mr. Smith – 60%.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
We provide limited perquisites and benefits. To attract, retain and reward named executive officers, we provide an overall benefit package similar to those received by similarly-situated executive officers at comparably-sized companies in our industry and geographic region.
During fiscal year 2025, we paid premiums for life insurance policies for the benefit of each of our named executive officers. We also make available to our named executive officers health insurance and long-term disability programs that are available to our other employees.
Our named executive officers also receive an allowance up to $2,500 for the purpose of purchasing term life insurance with a named beneficiary of each officer’s choosing. Our Chief Executive Officer is entitled to up to $5,000 for the purpose of purchasing term life insurance. Each of our named executive officers currently employed by us also participates in our long-term disability plan that is generally available to all of our salaried employees.
Retirement Benefits
We provide retirement benefits to our named executive officers to attract, retain and reward named executive officers by providing an overall benefit package similar to those received by similarly-situated executive officers at comparably-sized companies in our industry and geographic region.
All of our named executive officers participate in our Incentive Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which is a defined contribution plan that provides for both employer and employee contributions. The 401(k) Plan uses a “safe harbor” design that provides for a matching contribution of 100% of a participant’s deferrals up to 3% of compensation plus 50% of the next 2% of deferrals (for a maximum 4% matching contribution). Matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan are immediately vested. Additionally, eligible employees hired after January 1, 2003, including Messrs. Thoren, Thome and Malone, with at least one hour of service during the relevant plan year who are employed by us at the end of such year receive a contribution in an amount equal to 3.25% of eligible compensation received during such year, which contribution is paid on the first $345,000 of compensation, as adjusted for cost-of-living increases, in accordance with Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”).These additional contributions under the 401(k) Plan fully vest after four years of employment.
Mr. Smith is eligible to participate in our Retirement Income Plan, which is a defined benefit pension plan for the benefit of our domestic employees hired prior to January 1, 2003. Benefits are based on the employee’s years of service and average annual base salary for the five highest consecutive calendar years of compensation in the ten-year period preceding retirement, reduced to take into account a participant’s Social Security benefits paid for by the Company.
Mr. Smith is also eligible to participate in our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which we refer to as the Supplemental Plan. The Supplemental Plan is intended to provide eligible participants and their surviving spouses and beneficiaries with the amount of employer-provided retirement benefits that the Retirement Income Plan would provide, but for the limitation on compensation that may be recognized under tax-qualified plans imposed by Section 401(a)(17) of the Code and the limitations on benefits imposed by Section 415 of the Code. As of March 31, 2025, Mr. Smith had not accrued any benefit under our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
We have provided more information about our defined benefit retirement plans and the benefits payable to our named executive officers under such plans under the heading “Pension Benefits at March 31, 2025.”
Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
We have employment agreements with each of our named executive officers. The decisions to enter into employment agreements and the terms of those agreements were based on our need to motivate and retain talent for our long-term growth and are consistent with similarly-situated executive officers at comparably sized companies in our industry and geographic region. The material terms of the employment agreements with our named executive officers are described under the heading “Employment Agreements.”
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
27 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Pursuant to their respective employment agreements, we have agreed to provide payments to certain of our named executive officers in the event of a termination of employment as a result of normal and early retirement, involuntary termination, death, and disability. Messrs. Malone, Thoren and Thome are also eligible to receive additional payments in the event of termination following a change in control. We believe these arrangements promote stability and continuity of leadership to the benefit of our named executive officers and the Company. See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” for further information regarding these arrangements.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In order to more closely align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders, the Compensation Committee has established minimum stock ownership guidelines that require our named executive officers to work towards acquiring and maintaining specific levels of equity ownership interests in our common stock within specified time frames. A summary of our current stock ownership guidelines for our named executive officers is as follows:
Position |
|
Stock Ownership Guideline |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Common stock with a value equal to at least 4.00 times his annual base salary |
Other named executive officers |
|
Common stock with a value equal to at least 2.00 times his annual base salary |
Our stock ownership guidelines also require our named executive officers to retain 50% of the net shares realized (after tax) when a RSU, PSU or restricted stock award (“RSA”) vests or a stock option is exercised until they are in compliance with the guidelines, unless waived by the Chair of the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee monitors the progress made by our named executive officers in achieving their stock ownership guidelines and, if circumstances warrant, may modify the guidelines and/or time frames for one or more of our named executive officers. Under the guidelines, our named executive officers are directed to be in compliance with their respective ownership objectives within five years of becoming a named executive officer (with an additional two-fiscal year grace period if the guidelines are amended to increase the ownership target). If a named executive officer does not meet his ownership guidelines, the Compensation Committee may take that fact into consideration when evaluating such executive’s overall performance. As of the end of fiscal year 2025, all of our named executive officers were in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines, including three named executive officers who are in the grace period provided by the guidelines and expected to comply with the guidelines at the end of such period.
Policy for the Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation
Effective as of October 2, 2023, we adopted the Policy for the Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation in accordance with NYSE and SEC requirements. The Policy for Erroneously Awarded Compensation governs the recovery of erroneously awarded compensation received by executive officers on or after October 2, 2023 in the event of an accounting restatement. A copy of the Policy for the Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation is available on our website at www.grahamcorp.com under the heading “Investor Relations” and the subheadings “Governance” and “Governance Documents.”
Certain Tax and Accounting Implications
We periodically review accounting and tax laws, rules and regulations that may apply to our compensation programs. However, tax and accounting considerations have not significantly impacted the compensation programs that we offer to our named executive officers.
We account for stock-based employee compensation at fair value of the awards on the grant date and recognize the related cost in our statements of operations in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation.
28 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Risk Considerations in our Compensation Programs |
|
Risk Considerations in our Compensation Programs
At least one time each year, we undertake a Company-wide analysis of our compensation programs to assess whether they create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business. In fiscal year 2025, the Compensation Committee conducted its own risk assessment for our compensation programs and plans. As part of that assessment, the Compensation Committee reviewed the intent, purposes and practices of our compensation programs and plans. The Compensation Committee conducted this review in connection with a review of our business and growth strategies. Based on these reviews, we have concluded that our compensation programs are appropriately tailored to encourage employees to grow our business, but not incentivize them to do so in a way that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.
For example, our Cash Bonus Program and our Stock Bonus Plan, which are our two primary executive compensation programs, balance each other by providing compensation that rewards short-term (Cash Bonus Program) and long-term (Stock Bonus Plan) performance. The Cash Bonus Program balances risk by considering several performance metrics and capping the maximum payout a named executive officer can receive at 200% of target bonus level (target bonus level is between 100% and 50% of base salary for each of our named executive officers). In addition, our Stock Bonus Plan provides balanced incentives through equity-based compensation awards, which include RSUs and PSUs. The Compensation Committee believes that this mix of incentives, together with our executive stock ownership guidelines, encourages our named executive officers to achieve both short-term operating and long-term strategic objectives, including the long-term performance of our stock.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
29 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Fiscal Year 2025 Summary Compensation Table |
Fiscal Year 2025 Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows certain information about the compensation of our named executive officers for our two most recently completed fiscal years.
Name and Principal Position |
|
Fiscal |
|
Salary(1) |
|
Bonus |
|
|
Stock |
|
Non-Equity |
|
Change in |
|
All Other |
|
Total |
Daniel J. Thoren |
|
2025 |
|
500,000 |
|
— |
|
|
850,024 |
|
471,000 |
|
— |
|
32,350 |
|
1,853,374 |
Executive Chairman, Former CEO |
|
2024 |
|
400,000 |
|
730,000 |
(6) |
|
400,004 |
|
698,000 |
|
— |
|
23,039 |
|
2,251,043 |
Christopher J. Thome |
|
2025 |
|
359,986 |
|
— |
|
|
252,022 |
|
204,660 |
|
— |
|
25,976 |
|
842,644 |
VP - Finance, CFO, CAO and |
|
2024 |
|
312,000 |
|
— |
|
|
155,994 |
|
265,200 |
|
— |
|
24,693 |
|
757,887 |
Alan E. Smith |
|
2025 |
|
330,000 |
|
— |
|
|
197,988 |
|
190,839 |
|
76,611 |
|
16,963 |
|
812,401 |
VP and General Manager - |
|
2024 |
|
312,000 |
|
— |
|
|
155,994 |
|
241,566 |
|
70,072 |
|
16,165 |
|
795,797 |
Matthew J. Malone |
|
2025 |
|
341,667 |
(7) |
54,275 |
(8) |
|
197,988 |
|
195,450 |
|
— |
|
38,637 |
|
828,017 |
President & CEO, Former VP and GM - Barber-Nichols |
|
2024 |
|
312,000 |
|
312,396 |
(9) |
|
155,994 |
|
249,132 |
|
— |
|
45,486 |
|
1,075,008 |
Named Executive Officer |
|
Insurance |
|
|
401(k) Plan |
|
|
401(k) Plan |
|
|
Vacation |
|
|
Total |
|
|||||
Daniel J. Thoren |
|
6,260 |
|
14,877 |
|
11,213 |
|
— |
|
32,350 |
||||||||||
Christopher J. Thome |
|
483 |
|
14,280 |
|
11,213 |
|
— |
|
25,976 |
||||||||||
Alan E. Smith |
|
2,983 |
|
13,980 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
16,963 |
||||||||||
Matthew J. Malone |
|
1,083 |
|
14,317 |
|
10,545 |
|
12,692 |
|
38,637 |
30 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Fiscal Year 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards |
|
Fiscal Year 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table shows information regarding the grants of annual incentive cash compensation and restricted stock during fiscal year 2024 to our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts |
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
|
Type of |
|
Grant |
|
Threshold |
|
|
Target |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Threshold |
|
|
Target |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
or Units |
|
|
Awards (2) |
|
||||||||
Daniel J. Thoren |
|
PSUs(3)(4) |
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,314 |
|
16,628 |
|
33,256 |
|
|
|
|
425,012 |
||||||||||||
|
|
RSUs(3)(4) |
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,628 |
|
425,012 |
||||||||||
|
|
Annual Incentive |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
500,000 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Christopher J. Thome |
|
PSUs(3)(4) |
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,465 |
|
4,930 |
|
9,860 |
|
|
|
|
126,011 |
||||||||||||
|
|
RSUs(3)(4) |
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,930 |
|
126,011 |
||||||||||
|
|
Annual Incentive |
|
|
|
89,997 |
|
179,993 |
|
359,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Alan E. Smith |
|
PSUs(3)(4) |
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
3,873 |
|
7,746 |
|
|
|
|
98,994 |
||||||||||||
|
|
RSUs(3)(4) |
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,873 |
|
98,994 |
||||||||||
|
|
Annual Incentive |
|
|
|
82,500 |
|
165,000 |
|
330,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Matthew J. Malone |
|
PSUs(3)(4) |
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
3,873 |
|
7,746 |
|
|
|
|
98,994 |
||||||||||||
|
|
RSUs(3)(4) |
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,873 |
|
98,994 |
||||||||||
|
|
Annual Incentive |
|
|
|
85,417 |
|
170,834 |
|
341,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreements
During fiscal year 2025, we were a party to employment agreements with each of our named executive officers. The following is a summary of the key terms of each of these employment agreements.
Daniel J. Thoren. We entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Restated Thoren Agreement”) with Mr. Thoren effective as of February 5, 2025, which amended and restated the employment agreement between us and Mr. Thoren dated as of August 31, 2021. Pursuant to the terms of the Restated Thoren Agreement, Mr. Thoren served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company through the close of business on June 9, 2025 after which Mr. Thoren transitioned to Executive Chairman effective as of June 10, 2025. The Restated Thoren Agreement has a term of one-year and automatically renews such that it always has a one-year term remaining, unless we or Mr. Thoren elect not to extend the term further, in which case the term will end on the first anniversary of the date on which notice of such election not to extend is given. There were no changes to Mr. Thoren’s compensation during the remainder of his service as Chief Executive Officer. Effective June 10, 2025, Mr. Thoren’s base salary as Executive Chairman is equal to a rate of $250,000 per annum and he is required to devote approximately thirty (30) hours per week to his position. The Restated Thoren Agreement also provides for us to make certain payments to Mr. Thoren in the event we terminate his employment without cause or upon the occurrence of certain events relating to a change in control of the Company, as described under “Involuntary Termination” and “Termination Following a Change in Control” under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
In addition, if Mr. Thoren’s employment with us is terminated for any reason, he will be subject to a covenant not to disclose to anyone our confidential information as well as a 12-month covenant not to compete with us and not to interfere in certain of our business relationships.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
31 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Employment Agreements |
The Restated Thoren Agreement also provides that we will indemnify Mr. Thoren for all acts or omissions and for any suits brought against him which relate to duties he performed in good faith for us.
Christopher J. Thome. As of March 7, 2022, we entered into an Employment Agreement, effective as of April 4, 2022 with Mr. Thome, our Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Thome’s agreement automatically renews such that it always has a one-year term remaining, unless we or Mr. Thome elect not to extend the term further, in which case the term will end on the first anniversary of the date on which notice of such election not to extend is given. If not terminated sooner, the agreement will end on the last day of the month in which Mr. Thome turns 65. Mr. Thome’s initial base salary rate pursuant to the agreement was $290,000 per year. The agreement also provides for us to make certain payments to Mr. Thome in the event we terminate his employment without cause or upon the occurrence of certain events relating to a change in control of the Company, as described under “Involuntary Termination” and “Termination Following a Change in Control” under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
In addition, if Mr. Thome’s employment with us is terminated for any reason, he will be subject to a covenant not to disclose to anyone our confidential information as well as a 12-month covenant not to compete with us and not to interfere in certain of our business relationships.
The agreement also provides that we will indemnify Mr. Thome for all acts or omissions and for any suits brought against him which relate to duties he performed in good faith for us.
Alan E. Smith. On July 30, 2007, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Smith, as subsequently amended on December 31, 2008. The agreement provides that Mr. Smith will receive an annual minimum base salary as well as other customary benefits. Mr. Smith’s agreement automatically renews such that it always has a one-year term remaining, unless we or Mr. Smith elect not to extend the term further, in which case the term will end on the first anniversary of the date on which notice of such election not to extend is given. If not terminated sooner, the agreement will end on the last day of the month in which Mr. Smith turns 65. Mr. Smith’s initial base salary rate pursuant to the agreement was $152,500.
Pursuant to our employment agreement with Mr. Smith, if his employment with us is terminated for any reason, he will be subject to an 18-month covenant not to compete with us, not to interfere in certain of our business relationships, and not to disclose to anyone our confidential information.
Our employment agreement with Mr. Smith also provides for us to make certain payments to him in the event we terminate his employment without cause as described below under “Involuntary Termination” under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Our employment agreement with Mr. Smith provides that we will indemnify him for all acts or omissions and for any suits brought against him which relate to duties he performed in good faith for us.
Matthew J. Malone. We entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Restated Malone Agreement”) with Mr. Malone, effective as of February 5, 2025, which amended and restated the employment agreement between us and Mr. Malone dated as of June 1, 2021. Pursuant to the terms of the Restated Malone Agreement, Mr. Malone served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company effective February 5, 2025 through the close of business on June 9, 2025 (the “COO Period”). Effective June 10, 2025, Mr. Malone was employed as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO Period”). The Restated Malone Agreement has a term of one-year and automatically renews such that it always has a one-year term remaining, unless we or Mr. Malone elect not to extend the term further, in which case the term will end on the first anniversary of the date on which notice of such election not to extend is given. If not terminated sooner, the Restated Malone Agreement will end on the last day of the month in which Mr. Malone turns 65. Mr. Malone’s initial annual base salary pursuant to the Restated Malone Agreement was $400,000 per year during the COO Period and is $480,000 per year during the CEO Period. The Restated Malone Agreement also provides for us to make certain payments to Mr. Malone in the event we terminate his employment without cause or upon the occurrence of certain events relating to a change in control of the Company, as described under “Involuntary Termination” and “Termination Following a Change in Control” under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Pursuant to our the Restated Malone Agreement, if Mr. Malone’s employment with us is terminated for any reason, he will be subject to a covenant not to disclose to anyone our confidential information as well as a 12-month covenant not to compete with us and not to interfere in certain of our business relationships.
The Restated Malone Agreement also provides for us to make certain payments to Mr. Malone in the event we terminate his employment without cause as described below under “Involuntary Termination” under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
The Restated Malone Agreement also provides that we will indemnify Mr. Malone for all acts or omissions and for any suits brought against him which relate to duties he performed in good faith for us.
In addition, Mr. Malone was eligible to receive benefits under the Amended and Restated Performance Bonus Agreement (the “Performance Bonus Agreement”) during fiscal 2025. Mr. Malone will no longer qualify for benefits under the Performance Bonus Agreement during fiscal 2026 due to his appointment as our President and Chief Executive Officer. As part of our acquisition of Barber-Nichols, we entered into a contingent earn-out agreement dependent upon certain financial measures of Barber-Nichols post-acquisition. In the second quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 (“fiscal year 2022"), upon the request of the former shareholders of Barber-Nichols, the earn-out agreement was terminated and replaced with the Performance Bonus Agreement. The Performance Bonus Agreement provides certain employees of Barber-Nichols, including Mr. Malone, with performance-based cash awards based on the achievement of Barber-Nichols performance objectives for fiscal years ending March 31, 2024, 2025 and 2026. The bonus pool can range between $2,000,000 to $4,000,000 per year and is distributed among those certain employees eligible to participate at the time the bonus payment is made by the Company based upon each employee’s base salary, impact to the organization and length of service.
32 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Outstanding Equity Awards at March 31, 2025 |
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at March 31, 2025
The following table shows information regarding the equity awards held by our named executive officers at March 31, 2025.
|
Stock Awards |
|||||||||||
Name |
|
Grant |
|
Number of |
|
|
Market |
|
Equity |
|
|
Equity |
Daniel J. Thoren |
|
5/23/22 |
|
8,140 |
(2) |
|
234,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/17/23 |
|
12,177 |
(3) |
|
350,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/4/24 |
|
16,628 |
(4) |
|
479,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/23/22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,580 |
(6) |
|
1,025,416 |
|
|
5/17/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,530 |
(7) |
|
1,052,795 |
|
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,256 |
(8) |
|
958,438 |
Christopher J. Thome |
|
5/23/22 |
|
2,951 |
(2) |
|
85,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/17/23 |
|
4,749 |
(3) |
|
136,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/4/24 |
|
4,930 |
(4) |
|
142,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/23/22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,704 |
(6) |
|
510,229 |
|
|
5/17/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,246 |
(7) |
|
410,570 |
|
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,860 |
(8) |
|
284,165 |
Alan E. Smith |
|
5/23/22 |
|
3,053 |
(2) |
|
87,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/23/22 |
|
18,315 |
(5) |
|
527,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/17/23 |
|
4,749 |
(3) |
|
136,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/4/24 |
|
3,873 |
(4) |
|
111,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/23/22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,316 |
(6) |
|
527,867 |
|
|
5/17/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,246 |
(7) |
|
410,570 |
|
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,746 |
(8) |
|
223,240 |
Matthew J. Malone |
|
5/23/22 |
|
3,053 |
(2) |
|
87,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/17/23 |
|
4,749 |
(3) |
|
136,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/4/24 |
|
3,873 |
(4) |
|
111,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/23/22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,316 |
(6) |
|
527,867 |
|
|
5/17/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,246 |
(7) |
|
410,570 |
|
|
6/4/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,746 |
(8) |
|
223,240 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
33 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Outstanding Equity Awards at March 31, 2025 |
Fiscal Year 2025 Stock Vested
The following table shows information regarding the stock awards that vested during fiscal year 2025 for each of our named executive officers. None of our named executive officers exercised any options during fiscal year 2025.
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|||||
Name |
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Value Realized on |
|
||
Daniel J. Thoren |
|
2,979 |
|
94,851 |
||||
|
|
6,088 |
|
177,283 |
||||
|
|
8,140 |
|
231,257 |
||||
|
|
31,779 |
|
859,622 |
||||
Christopher J. Thome |
|
2,374 |
|
69,131 |
||||
|
|
2,951 |
|
83,838 |
||||
Alan E. Smith |
|
2,374 |
|
69,131 |
||||
|
|
3,053 |
|
86,736 |
||||
|
|
10,108 |
|
273,421 |
||||
Matthew J. Malone |
|
2,374 |
|
69,131 |
||||
|
|
3,053 |
|
86,736 |
||||
|
|
9,525 |
|
257,651 |
34 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Pension Benefits at March 31, 2025 |
|
Pension Benefits at March 31, 2025
At March 31, 2025, Mr. Smith was the only one of our named executive officers eligible to participate in our Retirement Income Plan and our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. The following table shows information at March 31, 2025 regarding our Retirement Income Plan and our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
Name |
|
Plan Name |
|
Number |
|
|
Present |
|
|
Payments |
|
|||
Alan E. Smith |
|
Retirement Income Plan |
|
30 |
|
1,143,081 |
|
— |
||||||
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
Retirement Income Plan
Our Retirement Income Plan is a defined benefit pension plan for the benefit of our domestic employees hired prior to January 1, 2003. The purpose of the Retirement Income Plan is to supplement Social Security benefits and to provide a reliable source of regular income for participants or their survivors after retirement by the participant. During fiscal year 2025, Mr. Smith was eligible to participate in the Retirement Income Plan.
Normal retirement under the Retirement Income Plan is generally the later of a participant’s 65th birthday or the 5th anniversary of the date on which he or she became a participant. Early retirement under the Retirement Income Plan is available for a participant who is at least 55 years old and has completed fifteen years or more of creditable service. The Retirement Income Plan also provides for a disability retirement allowance in the event of disability.
The Retirement Income Plan also provides for the payment of a retirement benefit in the event that a participant’s employment was terminated when the participant was not eligible for normal, early or disability retirement. Eligibility for such “vested retirement” requires the completion of five years of service with us. A participant who is entitled to a vested retirement allowance when his employment terminates will ordinarily begin receiving payments after reaching normal retirement age. If the participant has completed at least fifteen years of creditable service, he or she may elect to begin receiving payments on the first day of the month after he or she reaches age 55 and up to the first month after he or she reaches normal retirement age. The amount of a participant’s monthly vested retirement payment will vary depending on age, service and time of commencement.
Benefits under the Retirement Income Plan are based on the employee’s years of service and average annual base salary for the five highest consecutive calendar years of compensation in the ten-year period preceding retirement. Benefits under the Retirement Income Plan are reduced to take into account a participant’s Social Security benefits paid for by the Company. To calculate the present value of the accumulated benefits, the following assumptions were used: a 5.53% discount rate, the PRI-2012 White Collar Mortality Table dataset projected generationally by scale MP 2021 and a retirement age of 64.
The approximate years of creditable service as of March 31, 2025 of Mr. Smith was 30 years. Although our named executive officers may serve us for more than 30 years, we disregard creditable service in excess of 30 years.
The form and amount of the payments made under the Retirement Income Plan depends upon marital status when payment begins and the form of payment selected. The normal form of benefit for a married participant is a 100% joint and survivor annuity, which provides a retirement allowance in the form of reduced monthly payments that will continue for the rest of the participant’s life. If the participant is survived by the person who was the participant’s spouse when payments began, such spouse will receive survivor benefits equal to 100% of the amount of the payments made to the participant during his lifetime. His spouse will be paid survivor benefits for his or her remaining lifetime. Subject (in most cases) to the spouse’s consent, a participant may elect to receive benefits in the form of a single life annuity, 50% joint and survivor annuity, a Social Security Level Income Option, a 10, 15, or 20-year certain annuity or a life annuity with a 10, 15, or 20 year guarantee.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
In addition to the Retirement Income Plan, we maintain the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Supplemental Plan”) that is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan and is intended to provide eligible participants and their surviving spouses and beneficiaries with the amount of employer-provided retirement benefits that the Retirement Income Plan would provide but for the limitation on compensation that may be recognized under tax-qualified plans imposed by Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code and the limitations on benefits imposed by Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
35 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Pension Benefits at March 31, 2025 |
A participant who has completed a period of service of at least five years under the Retirement Income Plan and whose benefits are limited by the above-referenced provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, is entitled to receive a monthly benefit from the Supplemental Plan. As Mr. Smith is our only named executive officers hired prior to January 1, 2003, he is the only named executive officer eligible to participate in the Supplemental Plan. Mr. Smith has no accrued benefit under the Supplemental Plan as of March 31, 2025.
The monthly benefit under the Supplemental Plan is equal to the excess, if any, of the retirement benefits that would have been payable to or with respect to the plan participant under the Retirement Income Plan had the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code not been applicable over the retirement benefits payable to or with respect to the participant under the Retirement Income Plan.
A participant’s retirement benefits under the Supplemental Plan generally will be paid to or with respect to the participant in the same form and at the same time as the participant’s retirement benefits under the Retirement Income Plan. The benefits under the Supplemental Plan will terminate upon cessation of benefits to the participant or his beneficiary under the Retirement Income Plan.
Upon a “change in control” of the Company, each participant in the Supplemental Plan would automatically become 100% vested in his or her benefits. A “change in control” for the purposes of the Supplemental Plan is defined as:
401(k) Plan
All of our named executive officers currently employed by us are eligible to participate in our 401(k) Plan, which is available to all of our employees. Pursuant to the 401(k) Plan, we match funds deferred at the election of participants, up to a certain percentage, and we make non-elective contributions to the accounts of eligible participants. Matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan always are fully vested. Additionally, eligible employees hired after January 1, 2003 with at least one hour of service during the relevant plan year who are employed by us at the end of such year receive a nonelective contribution as described above.
Fiscal Year 2026 Compensation
For fiscal 2026, the L-T Percentage in effect for each of our named executive officers is as follows: Mr. Thoren – 50%; Mr. Malone – 125%; Mr. Thome - 70%; and Mr. Smith – 60%. Additionally, Mr. Dixon will be eligible for compensation under the Stock-Based Long-Term Incentive Award Plan with a L-T Percentage of 60%.
Further, for fiscal 2026, the target bonus levels under the Cash Bonus Program at 100% attainment of both Company and personal objectives are as follows: Daniel J. Thoren – 50% of base salary; Matthew J. Malone – 100% of base salary; Christopher J. Thome – 50% of base salary; and Alan E. Smith – 50% of base salary. Each named executive officer will be eligible to receive anywhere from 0% to 200% of his target bonus level depending on the attainment of such objectives. Additionally, Mr. Dixon will be eligible for compensation under the Cash Bonus Program in fiscal 2026, with a target bonus level at 50%.
36 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control |
|
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
The following information and the table entitled “Estimated Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control” describe the potential payments and benefits to each of our named executive officers upon a termination of employment or our change in control.
Assumptions and General Principles
The following assumptions and general principles apply with respect to the table entitled “Estimated Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control” and any termination of employment of a named executive officer:
Voluntary Termination and Termination for Cause
Pursuant to our employment agreements with certain of our named executive officers, cause exists if the Board determines that there has been willful misconduct by the named executive officers in connection with the performance of their duties or if the named executive officers have engaged in any other conduct that has been materially injurious to the Company or have breached any of the representations and warranties in their employment agreements. Under the employment agreement with Mr. Smith, upon termination for cause, we would pay all legal fees and other expenses incurred by Mr. Smith if he, in good faith, contests the termination. Mr. Smith would be required to reimburse us for all such costs if a court of final adjudication were to determine that he did not act in good faith in bringing such challenge.
Our named executive officers are not entitled to receive any severance payments or other benefits upon their voluntary decision to terminate employment with the Company prior to being eligible for retirement (other than compensation due through the date of termination) or upon termination for cause.
Pursuant to the Stock Bonus Plan, upon the retirement of a named executive officer at the age of 65 or later, all unvested RSUs granted under the plan will vest in accordance the vesting schedule of the award, and any outstanding PSUs will vest pro-rata based on the satisfaction of the applicable performance goals as determined at the end of the respective performance period.
Involuntary Termination
Our employment agreements with Messrs. Thoren, Thome, Smith, and Malone provide that, upon termination without cause, or if the individual resigns because of our material breach of his employment agreement, we will have the following obligations: (i) pay to him compensation due him through the date of termination, within ten business days of the termination date; (ii) continue his base salary for 12 months following such termination at an annual rate equal to the greater of $500,000, $290,000, $152,500 and $400,000, respectively, or his then-current annualized salary; and (iii) pay to him a prorated portion of his target bonus opportunity determined using the methodology in place for determining his bonus in the prior fiscal year.
Our obligation to make payments upon any termination of Messrs. Thoren, Thome, Smith and Malone without cause or upon his resignation because of a material breach of his agreement by us is conditioned on his execution of an enforceable release of all claims against us and his compliance with all provisions of his employment agreement.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
37 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control |
Death or Disability
Pursuant to our Stock Bonus Plan, upon the death or disability of a currently employed named executive officer, all unvested shares of time-vested restricted stock, RSUs and stock options, if any, held by the named executive officer will become immediately vested and the stock options will become exercisable in full. All unvested shares of performance-vested restricted stock or PSUs held by the named executive officer will vest pro-rata based on the target level of the applicable performance goals through the end of the quarter immediately preceding the date of the named executive officer’s death or disability.
All of our named executive officers currently employed by us participate in our life insurance plan, whereby his beneficiary would be entitled to a death benefit equal to the lessor of the named executive officer’s base salary rate or $250,000. We also provide each of our named executive officers with an allowance of $2,500 annually (except for our Chief Executive Officer, who is entitled to $5,000 annually) for the purpose of procuring a term life insurance policy.
Each of our named executive officers currently employed by us also participates in our short-term disability program that is available to our managers and executive officers. Pursuant to such program, each of Messrs. Thome and Smith, as a Batavia based named executive officer, would be entitled to payments equal to his full base salary for six months following such disability.
Termination Following a Change in Control
Our employment agreement with Messrs. Thoren, Malone, Thome and Smith requires a termination of employment following a change in control of our Company (commonly referred to as a “double trigger”) in order to trigger certain payments.
A “change in control” is defined in our employment agreement with Mr. Smith to include the following events:
A “change in control” is defined in our employment agreements with Messers. Thoren, Malone and Thome to include the following events:
38 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control |
|
Under his respective employment agreement, neither Mr. Thoren, Mr. Malone nor Mr. Thome will be entitled to any payments by us upon the occurrence of a change in control. Rather, upon the occurrence of a change in control, he must continue to provide us with the services contemplated by his employment agreement until three months after a change in control has occurred. However, upon the event of his termination within two years after a change in control, Messrs. Thoren and Malone are entitled to a lump sum in an amount equal to two and a half times the sum of his salary at the time of termination and the target amount of his bonus under the Cash Bonus Plan. Upon the event of his termination within two years after a change in control, Mr. Thome is entitled to a lump sum in an amount equal to two times the sum of his salary at the time of termination and the target amount of his bonus under the Cash Bonus Plan.
At the time of his termination following a change in control, any unvested stock options, RSUs, PSUs or RSAs held by Mr. Thoren, Mr. Malone or Mr. Thome accelerate and become immediately exercisable or fully vested. We would also be required to pay, six months after the triggering event, a lump sum payment in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the value of the aggregate benefits to which he would be entitled under any and all qualified and non-qualified defined contribution pension plans maintained by, or covering employees of, the Company as if he were 100% vested under such plans or (ii) the value of the benefits to which he is actually entitled under such defined contribution pension plans as of the date of his termination. Each of Mr. Thoren’s Mr. Malone's and Mr. Thome’s employment agreement contains certain limitations for these payments that relate to our ability to deduct such payments for federal income tax purposes. In addition, pursuant to our agreements with Messrs. Thoren, Malone and Thome, we are required to provide continuing health and medical coverage for a period of 18 months following termination of his employment.
Pursuant to his respective employment agreement, our obligation to make payments upon termination following a change in control is conditioned on the officer’s execution of an enforceable release of all claims and his compliance with all provisions of the employment agreement.
Regarding Mr. Thoren and Mr. Malone, pursuant to their respective employment agreements, triggering events that would be deemed events of termination include, among others, termination of the individual for any reason other than death, disability or cause, or resignation of the individual under the following circumstances:
The triggering events that would be deemed events of termination include, among others, termination of Mr. Thome for any reason other than death, disability or cause, or resignation of Mr. Thome under the following circumstances:
Mr. Smith: Under Mr. Smith’s employment agreement, Mr. Smith will not be entitled to any payments by us upon the occurrence of a change in control. Rather, upon the occurrence of a change in control, Mr. Smith must continue to provide us with the services contemplated by the employment agreement until three months after a change in control has occurred.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
39 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control |
General. In the event of any sale, merger or any form of business combination affecting us, our employment agreements with Messrs. Thoren, Thome, Smith and Malone require us to obtain the express written assumption of the agreement by the acquiring or surviving entity, and failure to do so would entitle the executive officer to all payments and other benefits to be provided by us in the event of termination without cause.
Award Agreements. In the event the named executive officer is terminated within 12 months of the change in control, unless the named executive officer is a party to an employment or other agreement providing for treatment of equity awards upon a change in control of the Company, our award agreements provide for the following treatment:
In addition, pursuant to the Supplemental Plan, in the event of a “change in control,” each participant in our Supplemental Plan, which currently includes Mr. Smith, would become 100% vested in his benefits.
40 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Estimated Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control |
|
Estimated Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
|
|
Involuntary |
|
|
Voluntary |
|
|
Death |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
Termination |
|
|||||
Daniel J. Thoren |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Continued salary |
|
500,000 |
|
500,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
||||||||||
Life insurance proceeds |
|
— |
|
— |
|
2,259,950 |
|
— |
|
— |
||||||||||
Accelerated vesting of RSAs, RSUs, PSAs and PSUs |
|
— |
|
— |
|
2,195,552 |
|
2,195,552 |
|
2,774,156 |
||||||||||
Short-term disability payments |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
18,000 |
|
— |
||||||||||
Cash severance payment |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
2,500,000 |
||||||||||
Health and medical coverage |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
21,270 |
||||||||||
Total(1) |
|
500,000 |
|
500,000 |
|
4,455,502 |
|
2,213,552 |
|
5,295,426 |
||||||||||
Christopher J. Thome |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Continued salary |
|
359,986 |
|
359,986 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
||||||||||
Life insurance proceeds |
|
— |
|
— |
|
250,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
||||||||||
Accelerated vesting of RSUs and PSUs |
|
— |
|
— |
|
774,228 |
|
774,228 |
|
936,016 |
||||||||||
Cash severance payment |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
1,079,958 |
||||||||||
Short-term disability payments |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
179,993 |
|
— |
||||||||||
Health and medical coverage(2) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
||||||||||
Total(1) |
|
359,986 |
|
359,986 |
|
1,024,228 |
|
954,221 |
|
2,015,974 |
||||||||||
Alan E. Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Continued salary |
|
330,000 |
|
330,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
||||||||||
Life insurance proceeds |
|
— |
|
— |
|
3,189,765 |
|
— |
|
— |
||||||||||
Accelerated vesting of RSAs, RSUs PSAs and PSUs |
|
— |
|
— |
|
1,274,542 |
|
1,274,542 |
|
1,445,150 |
||||||||||
Short-term disability payments |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
165,000 |
|
— |
||||||||||
Health and medical coverage |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
||||||||||
Total(1) |
|
330,000 |
|
330,000 |
|
4,464,307 |
|
1,439,542 |
|
1,445,150 |
||||||||||
Matthew J. Malone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Continued salary |
|
400,000 |
|
400,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
||||||||||
Life insurance proceeds |
|
— |
|
— |
|
250,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
||||||||||
Accelerated vesting of RSAs, RSUs, PSAs and PSUs |
|
— |
|
— |
|
746,703 |
|
746,703 |
|
917,312 |
||||||||||
Short-term disability payments |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
18,000 |
|
— |
||||||||||
Cash severance payment |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
1,500,000 |
||||||||||
Total(1) |
|
400,000 |
|
400,000 |
|
996,703 |
|
764,703 |
|
2,417,312 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
41 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Pay Versus Performance |
Pay Versus Performance
The following table sets forth the compensation information of our principal executive officer (the “PEO”) and the average compensation information of our other named executive officers (“non-PEO NEOs”), both as reported in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement and with certain adjustments to reflect the “compensation actually paid” to such individuals, as defined under the SEC’s pay versus performance disclosure rules, for each of fiscal year 2025, fiscal year 2024 and fiscal year 2023. For further information concerning our pay-for-performance philosophy and how we align executive compensation with Company financial performance, refer to the CD&A in this proxy statement.
Year |
|
Summary |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Value of |
|
|
Net |
|
||||||
2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEO |
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO |
|
|||
Adjustments for defined benefit pension plan |
|
|
|
|
(Deduct): Aggregate change in actuarial present value included in Summary |
|
|||
Add: Service cost for the covered fiscal year |
|
|||
Add: Prior service cost for the covered fiscal year |
|
|||
Adjustments for stock awards and option awards |
|
|
|
|
(Deduct): Aggregate value for stock awards and option awards included in Summary |
|
|||
Add: Fair value at year end of awards granted during the covered fiscal year that were |
|
|||
Add: Year-over-year change in fair value at covered fiscal year end of awards granted in |
|
|||
Add: Vesting date fair value of awards granted and vested during the covered fiscal year |
|
|||
Add: Change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of |
|
|||
(Deduct): Fair value at end of prior fiscal year of awards granted in any prior fiscal year |
|
|||
Add: Change in incremental fair value of awards modified during the covered fiscal year |
|
|||
Add: Dividends or other earnings paid on awards in the covered fiscal year prior to vesting |
|
|||
Compensation “Actually Paid” to PEO |
|
$ |
42 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Executive Compensation Pay Versus Performance |
|
|
|
Other Non-PEO NEOs (Average) |
|
|
|
|
2025 |
||
Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs |
|
$ |
||
Adjustments for stock awards and option awards |
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Aggregate value for stock awards and option awards included in Summary |
|
|||
Add: Fair value at year end of awards granted during the covered fiscal year that were |
|
|||
Add: Year-over-year change in fair value at covered fiscal year end of awards granted |
|
|||
Add: Vesting date fair value of awards granted and vested during the covered fiscal year |
|
|||
Add: Change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of |
|
|||
Deduct: Fair value at end of prior fiscal year of awards granted in any prior fiscal year |
|
|||
Add: Change in incremental fair value of awards modified during the covered fiscal year |
|
|||
Add: Dividends or other earnings paid on awards in the covered fiscal year prior to |
|
|||
Compensation “Actually Paid” to Non-PEO NEOs |
|
$ |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
43 |
Table of Contents
|
Executive Compensation Pay Versus Performance |
Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay Versus Performance Table
In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Company is providing the following graphs with respect to the relationships between information presented in the Pay Versus Performance table. For purposes of these graphs, we refer to compensation “actually paid” as “CAP.”
44 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Director Compensation Director Compensation Programs |
|
Director Compensation
Director Compensation Programs
The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves compensation for our independent directors. Messrs. Malone and Thoren, our President & Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, respectively, are not independent directors under applicable NYSE and SEC rules and, therefore, do not receive any additional compensation for services as a director. The compensation that we paid to Messrs. Malone and Thoren, in fiscal year 2025, is disclosed in the Fiscal Year 2025 Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement.
We use a combination of cash and equity-based compensation to attract and retain our independent directors. As described below, independent director compensation consists of an annual cash retainer, payable quarterly; an additional cash retainer for the Lead Independent Director and the chair of each committee of the Board, payable quarterly; and RSUs. We also reimburse our independent directors for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board and committee meetings. We do not provide retirement benefits to our independent directors.
Cash Compensation. For fiscal year 2025, each of our independent directors received an annual cash retainer fee of $55,000 for service on the Board. The Compensation Committee approved an increase to the annual cash retainer fee for service on the Board to $57,000 for fiscal year 2026.
The Chair of the Board and each of our independent directors serving as a chair of committees of the Board receive additional fees for such service in fiscal year 2025. For fiscal year 2025, the Chair of the Board received an additional annual fee of $50,000, the Chair of the Audit Committee received an additional annual fee of $15,000, the Chair of the Compensation Committee received an additional annual fee of $12,500 and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received an additional annual fee of $7,000. The Compensation Committee approved an increase to the additional annual fee for the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to $12,500 for fiscal year 2026 and the Lead Independent Director will receive the additional annual fee previously paid to the Chair of the Board.
Restricted Stock Units. During fiscal year 2025, equity compensation awards to independent directors were made in the form of RSUs awarded under the 2020 Plan. On June 4, 2024, the Compensation Committee awarded 2,934 RSUs to each of our then serving independent directors, with a grant date fair market value of approximately $74,993 and which vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Messrs. Stoner and Painter and Ms. Schnorr elected to defer the payment of shares of common stock underlying these RSUs until he or she is no longer a member of the Board. The Compensation Committee approved a change to our director compensation to increase the grant value of the independent director annual stock award to $77,000 for fiscal year 2026.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In order to more closely align the interests of our independent directors with the interests of our stockholders, the Compensation Committee established minimum stock ownership guidelines that require our independent directors to work towards acquiring and maintaining specific levels of equity ownership interests in our common stock within specified time frames.
We revised our stock ownership guidelines in 2022 to increase the common stock ownership target for our independent directors to an amount at least 5.0 times their annual cash retainer. Independent directors are expected to achieve their ownership guidelines within five years of becoming subject to the guidelines (with an additional two-fiscal year grace period if the guidelines are amended to increase the ownership target). Our stock ownership guidelines also require our independent directors to retain 50% of the net shares they realize (after tax) when a restricted stock award vests or a stock option is exercised until they are in compliance with the guidelines. The Compensation Committee monitors the progress made by independent directors in achieving their stock ownership guidelines and, in its discretion, may modify the guidelines and/or time frames for some or all of our independent directors. As of the end of fiscal year 2025, all of our independent directors were in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines, including directors who are in the grace period provided by the guidelines.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
45 |
Table of Contents
|
Director Compensation Fiscal Year 2025 Director Compensation Table |
Fiscal Year 2025 Director Compensation Table
The following table shows information regarding the compensation of our independent directors serving for all or part of fiscal year 2025.
Name |
|
Fees Earned or |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
Total |
|
||||
James J. Barber |
|
69,375 |
|
74,993 |
|
— |
|
144,368 |
||||||||
Alan Fortier(2) |
|
13,750 |
|
74,993 |
|
— |
|
88,743 |
||||||||
Cari L. Jaroslawsky |
|
63,250 |
|
74,993 |
|
— |
|
138,243 |
||||||||
Jonathan W. Painter |
|
106,250 |
|
74,993 |
|
— |
|
181,243 |
||||||||
Lisa M. Schnorr |
|
71,250 |
|
74,993 |
|
— |
|
146,243 |
||||||||
Troy A. Stoner |
|
56,250 |
|
74,993 |
|
— |
|
131,243 |
The table below presents the aggregate number of unvested RSUs outstanding for each of our independent directors serving at March 31, 2025. None of our independent directors serving at March 31, 2025 held any unexercised stock option awards as of such date.
Name |
|
Number of unvested RSUs |
|
|
James J. Barber |
|
2,934 |
||
Alan Fortier |
|
2,934 |
||
Cari L. Jaroslawsky |
|
2,934 |
||
Jonathan W. Painter |
|
2,934 |
||
Lisa M. Schnorr |
|
2,934 |
||
Troy A. Stoner |
|
2,934 |
46 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Proposal Two: Advisory Vote on the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers Board Recommendation |
|
Proposal Two:
Advisory Vote on the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as described in the CD&A, accompanying compensation tables and related narrative discussion contained in this proxy statement. In 2023, we held an advisory vote on the frequency of our “say on pay” vote, which resulted in a recommendation for an annual frequency for the “say on pay” vote. After considering that recommendation, the Board determined that the “say on pay” vote will be held annually until the next required vote on the frequency of the “say on pay” vote which will be considered in 2029.
We encourage stockholders to carefully review the CD&A section of this proxy statement for additional details on our executive compensation programs, including our compensation philosophy and objectives, as well as the processes our Compensation Committee used to determine the structure and amounts of the compensation of our named executive officers during fiscal year 2025. For your convenience, we have provided an executive summary in the first few pages of the CD&A section that highlights information that we believe is particularly important in helping you decide how to vote on this proposal. You should also carefully review the tables that immediately follow the CD&A, together with the related narrative disclosure and footnotes.
We are asking you to indicate your support for the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.
As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding upon the Board or the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions expressed by stockholders in their vote on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote in deciding whether to take any action as a result of the vote and when making future compensation decisions for named executive officers.
Board Recommendation
Our Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the following advisory resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related narrative discussions set forth in this proxy statement, is hereby approved.”
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
47 |
Table of Contents
|
Proposal Three: Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Board Recommendation |
Proposal Three:
Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm in fiscal year 2025. The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026. This appointment will be presented to our stockholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting. The Audit Committee will consider the outcome of this vote in its future discussions regarding the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.
We have been advised by Deloitte & Touche LLP that a representative will be present at the Annual Meeting and that such representative will be available to respond to appropriate questions. Such representative will be given an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires.
Board Recommendation
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ended March 31, 2026.
Fees Paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP
We paid the following fees to Deloitte & Touche LLP for fiscal year 2025 and fiscal year 2024:
|
|
Fiscal Year 2025 |
|
Fiscal Year 2024 |
Audit fees |
|
$760,000 |
|
$778,048 |
Audit-related fees |
|
75,000 |
|
25,500 |
Tax fees |
|
— |
|
73,500 |
All other fees |
|
2,047 |
|
2,047 |
Total fees |
|
$837,047 |
|
$879,095 |
Audit fees for each of fiscal year 2025 and fiscal year 2024 included fees associated with audits of our financial statements and reviews of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Audit-related fees for fiscal year 2025 include fees for the issuance of a consent for a registration statement on Form S-3. Audit-related fees for fiscal year 2024 include fees for the issuance of a consent for a registration statement on Form S-8. Tax fees for fiscal year 2024 include the fees related to the assistance provided in applying for the employee retention tax credit. All other fees for fiscal year 2025 and fiscal year 2024 included the subscription fees for the Deloitte & Touche LLP Technical Library Research Tool.
The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of permitted non-audit services described above has not compromised the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
The Audit Committee has adopted procedures for pre-approving all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee annually pre-approves a list of specific services and categories of services, subject to a specified cost level. Part of this approval process includes making a determination as to whether permitted non-audit services are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority up to $100,000 to the Chair of the Audit Committee, subject to reporting any such approvals at the next Audit Committee meeting.
The Audit Committee monitors the services rendered and actual fees paid to our independent registered public accounting firm quarterly to ensure that such services are within the scope of approval. All audit and permitted non-audit services for which Deloitte & Touche LLP was engaged were pre-approved by the Chair of the Audit Committee.
48 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Report of the Audit Committee |
|
Report of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of our Board and has other duties and functions as described in its charter. Management has the primary responsibility for the Company’s financial statements and the reporting process. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, is responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
The Audit Committee has:
The Audit Committee discussed with the personnel responsible for the internal audit function and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the personnel responsible for overseeing the internal audit function and with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, the evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board (and our Board has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2025 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has also appointed the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026 and has submitted such appointment for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting.
Audit Committee: |
Lisa M. Schnorr (Chair) |
James J. Barber |
Cari L. Jaroslawsky |
Jonathan W. Painter |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
49 |
Table of Contents
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Policies and Procedures for Review, Approval or Ratification of Related Person Transactions |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Policies and Procedures for Review, Approval or Ratification of Related Person Transactions
Our Audit Committee reviews all relationships and transactions in which the Company and our directors and executive officers or their immediate family members are participants in advance for review and approval. Any existing related person transactions are reviewed at least annually by the Audit Committee. Any director or executive officer with an interest in a related person transaction is expected to recuse himself or herself from any consideration of the matter.
Although the Audit Committee has not established a written policy regarding the approval of related person transactions, when evaluating these transactions, the Audit Committee considers, among other factors:
To the extent that the transaction involves an independent director, consideration is also given, as applicable, to the listing standards of the NYSE and other relevant rules related to independence.
In addition, our Audit Committee also reviews all transactions between us and any entity with which an independent director or executive officer is an affiliate, taking into account the factors listed above as well as all other factors deemed appropriate by the Audit Committee.
Barber-Nichols, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, is a party to two building lease agreements and two equipment lease agreements with Ascent Properties, LLC, a limited liability company of which Daniel J. Thoren holds a majority interest. During fiscal year 2025, lease payments made under these lease agreements was $1.0 million. As of March 31, 2025, the anticipated aggregate remaining payment obligations under the building and equipment lease agreements were approximately $4.8 million.
50 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The table below shows certain information, as of June 27, 2025, regarding the only persons known to us to be the beneficial owners of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of our common stock, with percentages based on 10,975,874 shares outstanding.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number of Shares of |
|
|
Percent of Class |
BlackRock, Inc |
|
757,147 |
(1) |
|
6.9% |
Brandes Investment Partners, L.P., et al. |
|
1,133,455 |
(2) |
|
10.3% |
The Vanguard Group |
|
665,865 |
(3) |
|
6.1% |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
51 |
Table of Contents
|
Security Ownership of Management |
Security Ownership of Management
The table below shows certain information, as of June 27, 2025, regarding shares of our common stock held by (i) each of our directors; (ii) each of our named executive officers; and (iii) all directors, named executive officers and executive officers as a group.
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number of Shares of |
|
Percent of Class |
|
Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Barber, Ph.D. |
|
53,835 |
|
|
— |
Cari L. Jaroslawsky |
|
16,667 |
|
|
— |
Jonathan W. Painter |
|
32,600 |
(3) |
|
— |
Lisa M. Schnorr |
|
35,911 |
(3)(4) |
|
— |
Troy A. Stoner |
|
16,667 |
(3) |
|
— |
Named Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Malone(5) |
|
53,064 |
|
|
— |
Daniel J. Thoren(6) |
|
351,783 |
|
|
3.2% |
Christopher J. Thome |
|
27,360 |
|
|
— |
Alan E. Smith |
|
66,634 |
|
|
— |
All directors, named executive officers and executive officers as a group (10 persons) |
|
654,988 |
(7) |
|
6.0% |
52 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders |
|
2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Shareholder Proposals for Inclusion in the Proxy Materials for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
We will include in our proxy materials for our 2026 annual meeting of stockholders any stockholder proposals that comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. Among other things, Rule 14a-8 requires that we receive such proposals not less than 120 days prior to the one-year anniversary of this proxy statement, or March 17, 2026. If the proposal is in compliance with all of the requirements set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, we will include the stockholder proposal in our proxy statement and place it on the form of proxy issued for the 2026 annual meeting. Stockholder proposals submitted for inclusion in our proxy materials should be mailed to the following address: Graham Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 20 Florence Avenue, Batavia, New York 14020.
Shareholder Proposals for Consideration at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but not for Inclusion in the Proxy Materials
Pursuant to our By-laws, items of business that are proposed outside of the process pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act as described above, may properly be brought before the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders only if we receive notice of such business no earlier than 120 days and no later than 90 days prior to the one-year anniversary of our 2025 Annual Meeting. Thus, for the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders, we must receive notice of business that is not submitted for inclusion in our proxy materials pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act between April 28, 2026 and May 28, 2026. The notice must be in accordance with and contain all information provided for in our By-laws and such business must be a proper matter for stockholder action under the General Corporation Law of Delaware. We will not permit business that does not comply with the foregoing notice requirement to be brought before the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders. Stockholder business that is not submitted for inclusion in our proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 should be mailed to the following address: Graham Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 20 Florence Avenue, Batavia, New York 14020. You may obtain a copy of our By-laws by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the address above.
Stockholder Nominations of Directors
Pursuant to our By-laws, no nominations for directors shall be acted upon at the annual meeting except for those made by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and those made by stockholders of record upon timely notice in writing to our Corporate Secretary. To be considered timely, notice must be received by us no earlier than 120 days and no later than 90 days prior to the one-year anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting. Thus, for the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders, we must receive the notice between April 28, 2026 and May 28, 2026. The notice must contain all information, including the completed questionnaire, referenced in our By-laws. Stockholder notice of nominations for directors should be mailed to the following address: Graham Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 20 Florence Avenue, Batavia, New York 14020. You may obtain a copy of our By-laws by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the address above.
In addition to satisfying the advance notice requirements under our By-laws, to comply with the universal proxy rules under the Exchange Act, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice to our Corporate Secretary that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than June 29, 2026.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
53 |
Table of Contents
|
Other Matters |
Other Matters
The Board does not know of any other matters that may be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. Should any other matters come before the Annual Meeting, however, the persons named as proxies will have discretionary authority to vote all proxies with respect to such matters in accordance with their judgment.
|
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
|
Dated: July 15, 2025 |
Christopher Thome Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Secretary |
54 |
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Table of Contents
Appendix A |
|
Appendix A - Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measure
The table below shows the reconciliation of the Company’s Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA for the period presented:
Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation
(Unaudited, $ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
2025 |
Net Income |
|
$12,230 |
Income taxes |
|
3,177 |
Net interest income |
|
(583) |
Depreciation |
|
3,718 |
Amortization |
|
2,218 |
Earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) |
|
20,760 |
Barber-Nichols earnout bonus |
|
4,258 |
Stock compensation |
|
1,957 |
ERP implementation costs |
|
882 |
Acquisition income |
|
(1,170) |
Adjusted earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization (Adjusted EBITDA) |
|
$26,687 |
Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. and may not be comparable to the measures as used by other companies.
Adjusted EBITDA was established by the Compensation Committee as a performance measure under the Annual Executive Cash Bonus Program. The Adjusted EBITDA measure used by the Compensation Committee as a performance measure differs from the Adjusted EBITDA measure presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 (“2025 Form 10-K”). The Adjusted EBITDA metric used by the Compensation Committee adds back expenses incurred under the Barber-Nichols earnout bonus which is not added back for purposes of the Adjusted EBITDA information included in our 2025 Form 10-K or other financial reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Compensation Committee decided to add back expenses incurred under the Barber-Nichols Bonus Program because when the Barber-Nichols Bonus Program was adopted in fiscal 2022 it replaced the earn-out agreement the Company entered into with the prior owners of Barber-Nichols. The Compensation Committee views the expenses associated with the Barber-Nichols Bonus Program as non-recurring because they were awarded in lieu of the earnout consideration for the purchase of Barber-Nichols. The Barber-Nichols Bonus Program expires after fiscal 2026.
GRAHAM CORPORATION 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
A-1 |
Table of Contents
NYSE: GHM graham Corporation 20 Florence Avenue Batavia, New York 14020 (585) 343-2216 www.garahamcorp.com
Table of Contents
GHM P.O. BOX 8016, CARY, NC 27512-9903 Your vote matters! Have your ballot ready and please use one of the methods below for easy voting: Your control number Have the 12 digit control number located in the box above available when you access the website and follow the instructions. Graham Corporation Annual Meeting of Stockholders For Stockholders of record as of June 27, 2025 Tuesday, August 26, 2025 9:00 AM, Eastern Time The Annual Meeting will be held live via the Internet. Please visit www.proxydocs.com/GHM for more details. Internet: www.proxypush.com/GHM Cast your vote online Have your Proxy Card ready Follow the simple instructions to record your vote Phone: 1-866-256-0715 Use any touch-tone telephone Have your Proxy Card ready Follow the simple recorded instructions Mail: Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card Fold and return your Proxy Card in the postage-paid envelope provided Virtual: You must register to attend the meeting online and/or participate at www.proxydocs.com/GHM YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! PLEASE VOTE BY: 9:00 AM, Eastern Time, August 26, 2025. This proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints Daniel J. Thoren and Jonathan W. Painter (the "Named Proxies"), and each or either of them, as the true and lawful attorneys of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and revocation, and authorizes them, and each of them as proxies, to vote all the shares of capital stock of Graham Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at said Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof upon the matters specified and upon such other matters as may be properly brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, conferring authority upon such true and lawful attorneys to vote in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and revoking any proxy heretofore given. THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, SHARES WILL BE VOTED IDENTICAL TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDATION. In their discretion, the Named Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. If you hold shares in any Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or 401(k) savings plan of Graham Corporation (the "Plans"), then this proxy card, when signed and returned, or your telephone or Internet proxy, will constitute voting instructions on matters properly coming before the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof in accordance with the instructions given herein to the trustee for shares held in any of the Plans. Shares in each of the Plans for which voting instructions are not received by August 21, 2025 at 5:00 PM ET, or if no choice is specified, will be voted by an independent fiduciary. You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (SEE REVERSE SIDE) but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendation. The Named Proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign (on the reverse side) and return this card. PLEASE BE SURE TO SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY CARD AND MARK ON THE REVERSE SIDE Copyright © 2025 BetaNXT, Inc. or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved
Table of Contents
GHM Graham Corporation Annual Meeting of Stockholders Please make your marks like this: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE: FOR ON PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 3 PROPOSAL YOUR VOTE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS 1. Election of three director nominees 1.01 Cari L. Jaroslawsky 1.02 Matthew J. Malone 1.03 Jonathan W. Painter FOR WITHHOLD 2. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 3. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026 NOTE: The proxies are authorized to vote, in their discretion, upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjourment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR You must register to attend the meeting online and/or participate at www.proxydocs.com/GHM Authorized Signatures - Must be completed for your instructions to be executed. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on your account. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the Proxy/Vote Form. Signature (and Title if applicable) Date Signature (if held jointly) Date