VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL) posts H1 loss yet waives all fees
VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL) reports a sharp decline for the six months ended June 30, 2026, driven by a drop in bitcoin prices. Net assets fell from $1,382,273,990 at December 31, 2025 to $958,827,545, a 30.63% decrease, while bitcoin fell 32.48% from $87,432.00 to $59,037.45.
The Trust held 16,241.00 bitcoin worth $958,827,545 at June 30, 2026, up from 15,809.70 bitcoin at year-end, and Shares outstanding rose to 57,425,000. NAV per Share declined from $24.73 to $16.70, a 32.47% drop, closely tracking bitcoin’s move.
Net decrease in net assets from operations was $(458,070,903), reflecting $(438,684,196) of unrealized depreciation and $(19,386,707) of realized losses on bitcoin sold for redemptions. Operating expenses were fully offset by a Sponsor Fee waiver through July 31, 2026, resulting in a reported 0.00% net expense ratio.
Positive
- Sponsor fee fully waived through July 31, 2026 on the first $2.5 billion of assets, producing a 0.00% net expense ratio for the period and reducing structural drag for shareholders while bitcoin prices declined.
- Bitcoin holdings increased to 16,241.00 BTC from 15,809.70 BTC over six months, as net creations (12,125,000 Shares issued vs. 10,600,000 redeemed) modestly increased exposure despite price weakness.
Negative
- Net assets fell 30.63% from $1.38 billion to $958.83 million in six months, driven by a 32.48% decline in bitcoin’s price and $(458.1 million) in combined realized and unrealized losses.
- NAV per Share declined 32.47% from $24.73 to $16.70 over six months, mirroring bitcoin’s drop and highlighting the Trust’s full exposure to bitcoin price volatility.
- Three-month performance also weak: NAV decreased 17.22% in Q2 2026, with a $(148.16 million) net decrease from operations as bitcoin fell 13.33% in the quarter.
Filing Explained
After July 31, 2026, HODL’s disclosed 0.20% Sponsor Fee resumes, creating an expense for the Trust after the full waiver.
A Form 10-Q is an unaudited quarterly report. This filing covers
The fee accrues daily and is paid monthly. The Sponsor uses it to pay the Trust’s operating expenses, except litigation and other extraordinary expenses.
The filing reports 58,875,000 Shares outstanding as of
Key Figures
Key Terms
Bitcoin Benchmark Rate financial
Sponsor Fee financial
grantor trust regulatory
Authorized Participants financial
digital commodity regulatory
GENIUS Act regulatory
FAQ
How did VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL) perform in the first half of 2026?
What happened to HODL’s NAV per Share during the period ended June 30, 2026?
How many bitcoin and Shares did VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL) hold at June 30, 2026?
What were the key drivers of VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL)’s loss from operations?
What fees and expenses did HODL incur during the first half of 2026?
How active were creations and redemptions in VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL) in H1 2026?
What market risk does VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL) highlight for investors?
AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
| Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended |
or
| Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from_________________to______________________. |
Commission file number:
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
c/o VanEck Digital Assets, LLC
Jonathan R. Simon, Esq.
Matthew A. Babinsky, Esq.
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit such files). ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large Accelerated Filer | ☐ | Accelerated Filer | ☐ | |
| ☒ | Smaller Reporting Company | |||
| Emerging Growth Company |
If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes
The registrant had
VanEck Bitcoin ETF
Table of Contents
| Page | |
| Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION. | 1 |
| Item 1. Unaudited Financial Statements. | 1 |
| Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. | 11 |
| Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. | 12 |
| Item 4. Controls and Procedures. | 13 |
| Part II. OTHER INFORMATION. | 14 |
| Item 1. Legal Proceedings. | 14 |
| Item 1A. Risk Factors. | 14 |
| Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. | 21 |
| Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. | 21 |
| Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. | 21 |
| Item 5. Other Information. | 21 |
| Item 6. Exhibits. | 21 |
| SIGNATURES. | 23 |
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
Item 1. Unaudited Financial Statements.
VANECK BITCOIN ETF
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
| June 30, 2026 (Unaudited) | December 31, 2025 | |||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Investment in bitcoin, at fair value (cost $ | $ | $ | ||||||
| Receivable for investment in bitcoin sold | ||||||||
| Total assets | ||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||
| Payable for shares redeemed | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||||
| Net assets | $ | $ | ||||||
Shares issued and outstanding ( | ||||||||
| Net Asset Value per Share | $ | $ | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
| 1 |
VANECK BITCOIN ETF
Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | |||||||||||||
| Expenses | ||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor fee, related party | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Total expenses | ||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor fee waiver, related party | ( | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||
| Net expenses | ||||||||||||||||
| Net investment loss | ||||||||||||||||
| Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net realized gain (loss) on: | ||||||||||||||||
| Bitcoin sold for redemption of shares | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Bitcoin distributed for Sponsor fee, related party | ||||||||||||||||
| Net realized gain (loss) from investment in bitcoin | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investment in bitcoin | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
| 2 |
VANECK BITCOIN ETF
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (Unaudited)
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2026 |
2025 |
2026 |
2025 | |||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) from operations | ||||||||||||||||
| Net investment loss | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Net realized gain (loss) from investment in bitcoin | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments in bitcoin | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Capital Share transactions | ||||||||||||||||
| Contributions for shares issued | ||||||||||||||||
| Withdrawals for shares redeemed | ( | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in capital share transactions | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Net assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Beginning of period | ||||||||||||||||
| End of period | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
| 3 |
VANECK BITCOIN ETF
Schedules of Investment
| June 30, 2026 (Unaudited) | ||||||||||
| Description | Quantity | Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
| Bitcoin | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Total Investment in bitcoin – | ||||||||||
| Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets – | ||||||||||
| Net Assets – | $ | |||||||||
| December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||
| Description | Quantity | Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
| Bitcoin | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Total Investment in bitcoin – | ||||||||||
| Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets – | ||||||||||
| Net Assets – | $ | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
| 4 |
VANECK BITCOIN ETF
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements
June 30, 2026
Note 1. Organization:
VanEck Bitcoin ETF (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust, is an exchange-traded fund that issues common shares of beneficial interest in an ownership of the Trust (the “Shares”). The Shares are traded on the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the “Exchange”). The Trust’s investment objective is to reflect the performance of the price of bitcoin less the net operating expenses of the Trust. The Trust is managed and controlled by VanEck Digital Assets, LLC (the “Sponsor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Van Eck Associates Corporation (“VanEck”). The CSC Delaware Trust Company is the “Trustee” of the Trust.
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies:
| A. | Basis of Preparation and Use of Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Trust qualifies as an investment company solely for accounting purposes and not for any other purpose and follows accounting and reporting requirements of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 Financial Services—Investment Companies (“ASC Topic 946”), but is not registered, and is not required to be registered, as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
| B. | Cash |
Cash, if any, represents cash
deposits held at a major financial institution and is subject to credit risk to the extent its balance exceeds the federally insured
limits. As of June 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, the Trust did
| C. | Investment Valuation |
The Trust values its investment in bitcoin and other assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
The Trust identifies and determines the bitcoin principal market (or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market) for GAAP financial statement purposes consistent with the application of fair value measurement framework in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 820 at 11:59 p.m. EST. Under ASC 820, a principal market is the market with the greatest volume and activity level for the asset or liability. The Sponsor on behalf of the Trust will determine in its sole discretion the valuation sources and policies used to prepare the Trust’s financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities. Inputs may be based on independent market data or they may be internally developed. These inputs are categorized into a disclosure hierarchy consisting of three broad levels for financial reporting purposes. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not considered to be active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means; and
| 5 |
VANECK BITCOIN ETF
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements (continued)
June 30, 2026
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs where there are little or no market activity for the asset or liability, including the Trust’s assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments.
The following is a summary of the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025:
| June 30, 2026 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment in bitcoin | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2025 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment in bitcoin | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
The following represents the changes in quantity of bitcoin and the respective fair value:
| Bitcoin | Fair Value | |||||||
| Beginning balance as of January 1, 2026 | $ | |||||||
| Bitcoin purchased | ||||||||
| Bitcoin purchased in-kind | ||||||||
| Bitcoin sold | ( | ( | ||||||
| Bitcoin sold in-kind | ||||||||
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investment in bitcoin | ( | |||||||
| Net realized loss on investment in bitcoin | ( | |||||||
| Ending balance as of June 30, 2026 | $ |
| Bitcoin | Fair Value | |||||||
| Beginning balance as of January 1, 2025 | $ | |||||||
| Bitcoin purchased | ||||||||
| Bitcoin sold | ( | ( | ||||||
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investment in bitcoin | ( | |||||||
| Net realized gain on investment in bitcoin | ||||||||
| Ending balance as of December 31, 2025 | $ |
| D. | Bitcoin |
Bitcoin transactions are accounted for on trade date. Realized gains and losses on the sale of bitcoin are determined based on the average cost method. Under ASC Topic 946, the average cost method is an accepted method to determine realized gains and losses on the sale of bitcoin. Proceeds received by the Trust from the issuance of baskets consist of bitcoin. Deposits of bitcoin are held by Gemini Trust Company, LLC (the “Bitcoin Custodian”) and at Coinbase Custody Trust Company, LLC (the “Additional Bitcoin Custodian”, and collectively the “Bitcoin Custodians”), on behalf of the Trust until (i) delivered out in connection with redemptions of baskets or cash or (ii) sold by the Sponsor, which may be facilitated by the Bitcoin Custodians, to pay fees due to the Sponsor and Trust expenses and liabilities not assumed by the Sponsor.
| E. | Calculation of Net Asset Value |
The Trust’s net asset value (“NAV”) is calculated based on the Trust’s net asset holdings, as reconciled to the Bitcoin Custodians’ accounts, on a market approach determined on a daily basis using the MarketVectorTM Bitcoin Benchmark Rate price at 4:00 pm EST. The Trust’s NAV per Share is calculated by taking the current market value of its total assets, subtracting any liabilities, and then dividing that total by the total number of outstanding Shares. The Trust Agreement gives the Sponsor the exclusive authority to determine the Trust’s NAV and the Trust’s NAV per Share, which it has delegated to the administrator.
| 6 |
VANECK BITCOIN ETF
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements (continued)
June 30, 2026
| F. | Federal Income Taxes |
The Trust is treated as a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes and, therefore, no provision for federal income taxes is required. Any interest, expenses, gains and losses are passed through to the holders of Shares of the Trust. The Sponsor has reviewed the tax positions for the periods presented and has determined that no provision for income tax is required in the Trust’s financial statements.
| G. | Segment Reporting |
The Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Sponsor acts as the Trust’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), assessing performance and making decisions about resource allocation. The CODM has determined that the Trust has a single operating segment based on the fact that the Trust’s long-term strategic asset allocation is pre-determined in accordance with the terms of its prospectus, with a defined investment strategy which is executed by the Sponsor. The financial information provided to and reviewed by the CODM is presented within the Trust’s financial statements.
| H. | Interim financial statements |
The financial statements included herein were prepared without audit according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP may be omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary that were of a normal and recurring nature and adequate disclosures to present fairly the financial position and results of operations as of and for the periods indicated. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or for any other period.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Form 10-K previously filed with the SEC.
Note 3. Trust Expenses and Other Agreements
The Trust pays the Sponsor a unified fee
(the “Sponsor Fee”) of
The Trustee fee is paid by the Sponsor and is not an expense of the Trust.
The Trust holds its bitcoin at the Bitcoin Custodians, both of which are regulated third-party custodians that carry insurance (in the case of the Additional Bitcoin Custodian, such insurance is carried by its parent, Coinbase Inc., and is intended to cover the loss of client assets held by Coinbase Inc. and its subsidiaries, including the Additional Bitcoin Custodian) and are responsible for safekeeping of bitcoin owned by the Trust and holding private keys that provide access to the bitcoin in the Trust’s bitcoin account.
State Street Bank and Trust Company serves as the Trust’s administrator, transfer agent and cash custodian.
| 7 |
VANECK BITCOIN ETF
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements (continued)
June 30, 2026
Note 4. Related Parties
The Sponsor is considered to be a related party to the Trust.
MarketVector Indexes GmbH is the index sponsor and index administrator for the MarketVectorTM Bitcoin Benchmark Rate, which is used by the Trust to determine its NAV. MarketVector Indexes GmbH is an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of VanEck.
Van Eck Securities Corporation, a marketing agent to the Trust, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of VanEck.
As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025,
the VanEck’s ownership in the Trust represents approximately
VanEck is a minority interest holder in
the parent company of the Bitcoin Custodian, representing less than
VanEck is a minority equity holder in Metatech Holdings, the parent company of Nonco LLC and holds approximately
Note 5. Capital Share Transactions
Investors can buy and sell Shares of the Trust in secondary market transactions through brokers. Shares trade on the Exchange under the ticker symbol HODL. Shares are bought and sold throughout the trading day like other publicly traded securities.
The Trust continuously offers the Shares
in baskets consisting of
The Trust creates and redeems Shares, but only in one or more baskets. Baskets are only made in exchange for delivery to the Trust or the distribution by the Trust of the amount of bitcoin represented by the baskets being created or redeemed, the amount of which is equal to the combined NAV of the number of Shares included in the baskets being created or redeemed determined as of 4:00 p.m. EST on the day the order to create or redeem baskets is properly received. The authorized participants deliver cash or bitcoin to create baskets and receive cash or bitcoin when redeeming Shares. For a subscription in cash, an authorized participant will deliver cash to the Trust’s account at the cash custodian, which the Sponsor will then use to purchase bitcoin from a liquidity provider chosen by the Sponsor. For a redemption in cash, the Sponsor will arrange for the bitcoin represented by the basket to be sold to a liquidity provider chosen by the Sponsor and the cash proceeds distributed from the Trust’s account at the cash custodian to the authorized participant. For an “in-kind” subscription, authorized participants will deliver, or arrange for the delivery by the authorized participant’s designee of, bitcoin to the Trust’s account with the Bitcoin Custodians in exchange for Shares when they purchase Shares. For an “in-kind” redemption transaction with the Trust, when authorized participants redeem Shares, the Trust through the Bitcoin Custodians will deliver bitcoin to such authorized participants, or a designee thereof, in exchange for their Shares. Only authorized participants may place orders to create and redeem baskets through the transfer agent. The transfer agent will coordinate with the Trust’s Bitcoin Custodians to facilitate settlement of the Shares and bitcoin.
Share and capital activity is as follows:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 2025(a) | 2026 | 2025(a) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning of period | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares redeemed | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| End of period | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) |
| 8 |
VANECK BITCOIN ETF
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements (continued)
June 30, 2026
Note 6. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
In the normal course of business, the Trust enters into contracts that contain a variety of general indemnifications. The Trust’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet occurred. However, the Sponsor believes the risk of loss under these arrangements to be remote.
Note 7. Risk
Substantially all of the Trust’s assets are holdings of bitcoin, which creates a concentration risk associated with fluctuations in the value of bitcoin due to a number of factors. Accordingly, a decline in the value of bitcoin will have an adverse effect on the value of the Shares of the Trust. Factors that may have the effect of causing a decline in the value of bitcoin include high volatility, which could have a negative impact on the performance of the Trust. Bitcoin platforms are relatively new and may be unregulated or may be subject to regulation in a relevant jurisdiction, but may not be complying, and therefore, may be more exposed to fraud and security breaches than established, regulated exchanges for other financial assets or instruments, which could have a negative impact on the performance of the Trust. The value of the Shares depends on the development and acceptance of the bitcoin network. The slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of the bitcoin network may adversely affect an investment in the Trust. The price of bitcoin on the bitcoin market has exhibited periods of extreme volatility. Digital assets such as bitcoin were only introduced within the past decade, and the medium-to-long term value of the Shares is subject to a number of factors relating to the capabilities and development of block-chain technologies and to the fundamental investment characteristics of digital assets that are uncertain and difficult to evaluate. The Trust is subject to risks due to its concentration of investments in a single asset class. Possible illiquid markets may exacerbate losses or increase the variability between the Trust’s NAV and its market price. The amount of bitcoin represented by the Shares may decline over time.
Future and current regulations by a United States or foreign government or quasi-governmental agency could have an adverse effect on an investment in the Trust. Shareholders do not have the protections associated with ownership of Shares in an investment company registered under the 1940 Act or the protections afforded by the Commodity Exchange Act. Future legal or regulatory developments may negatively affect the value of bitcoin or require the Trust or the Sponsor to become registered with the SEC or CFTC, which may cause the Trust to liquidate.
The Exchange on which the Shares are listed may halt trading in the Trust’s Shares, which would adversely impact a Shareholder’s ability to sell Shares. The market infrastructure of the bitcoin spot market could result in the absence of active authorized participants able to support the trading activity of the Trust.
| 9 |
VANECK BITCOIN ETF
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements (continued)
June 30, 2026
Note 8. Financial Highlights(a)
The financial highlights summarize certain per share operating information and financial ratios of net investment loss and expenses, to daily average net assets for the periods below. An individual investor’s return and ratios may vary based on the timing of capital transactions:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | |||||||||||||
| Net asset value per share, beginning of period | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| From investment operations: | ||||||||||||||||
| Net investment loss(b) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net realized gain (loss) and change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments in bitcoin(c) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) resulting from operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net asset value per share, end of period | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Total return(d) | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Ratios to average net assets(e) | ||||||||||||||||
| Gross expense | ||||||||||||||||
| Net expense | ||||||||||||||||
| Net investment loss | ||||||||||||||||
| (a) | |
| (b) | |
| (c) | |
| (d) | |
| (e) |
Note 9. Subsequent Event Review
The Trust has evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that there are no material events that would require disclosure in the financial statements.
| 10 |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to financial statements included with this Report. The discussion and analysis that follows may contain statements that relate to future events or future performance. In some cases, such forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. All statements (other than statements of historical fact) included in this Report that address activities, events or developments that may occur in the future, including such matters as changes in commodity prices and market conditions (for bitcoin and the Shares), the operations of the Trust, the plans of the Sponsor and references to the Trust’s future success and other similar matters are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. These statements are based upon certain assumptions and analyses made by the Sponsor on the basis of its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. Whether or not actual results and developments will conform to the Sponsor’s expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the special considerations discussed in this Report, general economic, market and business conditions, changes in laws or regulations, including those concerning taxes, made by governmental authorities or regulatory bodies, and other world economic and political developments. Consequently, all the forward-looking statements made in this Report are qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments the Sponsor anticipates will be realized or, even if substantially realized, will result in the expected consequences to, or have the expected effects on, the Trust’s operations or the value of the Shares issued by the Trust. Moreover, neither the Sponsor nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the forward-looking statements. Neither the Trust nor the Sponsor undertakes an obligation to publicly update or conform to actual results any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law.
Introduction
The Trust is a Delaware statutory trust. The Trust does not have directors, officers or employees. The creation and operation of the Trust has been arranged by the Sponsor. The Trust is administered by the Trust Agreement, among the Sponsor, the Trustee and the Delaware Trustee. The Trust is managed and controlled by the Sponsor, a wholly-owned subsidiary of VanEck. The Sponsor is not governed by a board of directors.
The Trust’s investment objective is to reflect the performance of bitcoin less the operating expenses of the Trust. The Trust is a passive investment vehicle that does not seek to pursue any investment strategy beyond tracking the price of bitcoin. The Trust does not engage in any activities designed to obtain a profit from, or ameliorate losses caused by, changes in the price of bitcoin.
The Trust issues and redeems Shares only in aggregations of 25,000 Shares, a Basket, or integral multiples thereof, and only in transactions with Authorized Participants.
Shares of the Trust trade on the Exchange under the ticker symbol “HODL.”
Computation of Net Asset Value
The Trust’s NAV is calculated based on the Trust’s net asset holdings, as reconciled to the Bitcoin Custodians’ accounts, on a market approach determined on a daily basis in accordance with the MarketVectorTM Bitcoin Benchmark Rate price at 4:00 p.m. EST. The Trust’s NAV per Share is calculated by taking the current market value of its total assets, subtracting any liabilities, and then dividing that total by the total number of outstanding Shares. The Trust Agreement gives the Sponsor the exclusive authority to determine the Trust’s NAV and the Trust’s NAV per Share, which it has delegated to the Administrator.
Liquidity
The Trust is not aware of any trends, demands, conditions or events that are reasonably likely to result in material changes to its liquidity needs. In exchange for a fee, the Sponsor has agreed to assume most of the expenses incurred by the Trust. As a result, the
| 11 |
only ordinary expense of the Trust during the period covered by this Report was the Sponsor’s Fee. The Trust’s only source of liquidity is its sales of bitcoin.
Significant Accounting Policies
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amount of revenue and expenses reported during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. A description of the valuation of bitcoin, a critical accounting policy that the Trust believes is important to understanding its results of operations and financial position, is provided in the section entitled “Computation of Net Asset Value” above. In addition, please refer to Note 2 to the Financial Statements included in this Report for further discussion of the Trust’s accounting policies.
Results of Operations
The Three Months Ended June 30, 2026
The Trust’s NAV decreased from $1,158,283,647 at March 31, 2026 to $ 958,827,545 at June 30, 2026, a 17.22% decrease. The decrease in the Trust’s NAV resulted primarily from a decrease in the price of bitcoin, which decreased 13.33% from $68,115.81 at March 31, 2026 to $59,037.45 at June 30, 2026. In addition, the number of outstanding Shares decreased from 60,125,000 Shares at March 31, 2026 to 57,425,000 Shares at June 30, 2026. This is the net result of 3,200,000 Shares (128 Baskets) being created and 5,900,000 Shares (236 Baskets) being redeemed during the three months ended June 30, 2026.
The 13.29% decrease in the NAV per Share from $19.26 at March 31, 2026 to $16.70 at June 30, 2026 is primarily related to the 13.33% decrease in the price of bitcoin during these the months ended June 30, 2026.
The NAV per Share of $23.17 on May 11, 2026, was the highest during the three months, compared with a low during the three months of $16.70 on June 30, 2026.
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2026, was $(148,158,446) resulting from the net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investment in bitcoin of $(131,568,140), and a net realized loss of $(16,590,306) on bitcoin sold for the redemption of Shares. The Trust had no expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2026 as they were all waived by the Sponsor.
The Six Months Ended June 30, 2026
The Trust’s NAV decreased from $1,382,273,990 at December 31, 2025 to $958,827,545 at June 30, 2026, a 30.63% decrease. The decrease in the Trust’s NAV resulted primarily from a decrease in the price of bitcoin, which decreased 32.48% from $87,432.00 at December 31, 2025 to $59,037.45 at June 30, 2026. This decrease was partially offset as the number of outstanding Shares increased from 55,900,000 Shares at December 31, 2025 to 57,425,000 Shares at June 30, 2026. This is the net result of 12,125,000 Shares (485 Baskets) being created and 10,600,000 Shares (424 Baskets) being redeemed during the six months ended June 30, 2026.
The 32.47% decrease in the NAV per Share from $24.73 at December 31, 2025 to $16.70 at June 30, 2026 is primarily related to the 32.48% decrease in the price of bitcoin during these six months ended June 30, 2026.
The NAV per Share of $27.59 on January 14, 2026, was the highest during the six months, compared with a low during the six months of $16.70 on June 30, 2026.
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026, was $(458,070,903) resulting from a net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investment in bitcoin of $(438,684,196), and a net realized loss of $(19,386,707) on bitcoin sold for the redemption of Shares. The Trust had no expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2026 as they were all waived by the Sponsor.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Trust is a passive investment vehicle. The Trust does not use leverage, invest in derivative financial instruments, engage in foreign currency transactions, or have long-term debt. The principal market risk to which the Trust is exposed is the market price of bitcoin. Changes in the market price of bitcoin will directly affect the value of the Trust’s bitcoin holdings and the net asset value of the Shares, and such price may be volatile.
| 12 |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
The duly authorized officers of the Sponsor performing functions equivalent to those a principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Trust would perform if the Trust had any officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures, and have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures of the Trust were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Report to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Trust files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to the duly authorized officers of the Sponsor performing functions equivalent to those a principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Trust would perform if the Trust had any officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.
There were no changes in the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting.
| 13 |
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The trading prices of many digital assets, including bitcoin, have experienced extreme volatility in recent periods and may continue to do so. Extreme volatility in the future, including further declines in the trading prices of bitcoin, could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Shares and the Shares could lose all or substantially all of their value.
The trading prices of many digital assets, including bitcoin, have experienced extreme volatility in recent periods and may continue to do so. The average annualized one-year trailing volatility of bitcoin over the past ten years to date remains elevated at 65%. Over the course of 2021, there were steep increases in the value of certain digital assets, including bitcoin, and multiple market observers asserted that digital assets were experiencing a “bubble.” These increases were followed by steep drawdowns throughout 2022 in digital asset trading prices, including for bitcoin. In the 2021-2022 cycle, the price of bitcoin peaked at $67,734 and bottomed at $15,632, representing a 77% drawdown. After reaching an all-time high of approximately $125,000 in October 2025, the price of bitcoin declined to below $59,000 in June 2026, representing a drawdown of more than 50%, and there can be no assurance that the price of bitcoin will not decline further. These episodes of rapid price appreciation followed by steep drawdowns have occurred multiple times throughout bitcoin’s history, including in 2011, 2013-2014, and 2017-2018, before repeating again in 2021-2022, 2024, and 2025-2026. Digital asset prices have continued to fluctuate in 2025 and 2026 For example, bitcoin lost approximately 14% of its value according to some sources in mid-October 2025 as part of wider digital asset market turmoil, widely attributed to global trade tensions, which triggered a number of dislocations in the digital asset market (the “October 2025 Flash Crash”), including liquidations of up to $20 billion in collateral in the form of various digital assets (including, but not limited to, bitcoin) securing trades (particularly perpetual futures contracts and various forms of financing transactions), along with reported service interruptions, halted orders, forced unwinding of trades, and other issues, across centralized and decentralized exchanges. Digital asset prices, including the price of bitcoin, declined significantly during the first half of 2026, and during the second quarter of 2026, U.S. spot bitcoin exchange-traded products experienced their largest quarterly net outflows since such products launched in January 2024, according to some sources. As of the date of this report, the price of bitcoin remains significantly below its October 2025 all-time high, and digital asset prices continue to fluctuate significantly.
Extreme volatility may persist, and the value of the Shares may significantly decline in the future without recovery. The digital asset markets may still be experiencing a bubble or may experience a bubble again in the future. For example, in the first half of 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital Ltd., and Three Arrows Capital declared bankruptcy, resulting in a loss of confidence in participants of the digital asset ecosystem and negative publicity surrounding digital assets more broadly. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. (“FTX”), one of the largest digital asset platforms by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumors of the company’s liquidity issues and likely insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX’s CEO resigned and FTX and many of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar proceedings around the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the SEC and CFTC brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX’s and its affiliates’ senior executives, including its former CEO. In addition, several other entities in the digital asset industry filed for bankruptcy following FTX’s bankruptcy filing, such as BlockFi Inc. and Genesis Global Capital, LLC (“Genesis”). In April 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) issued a policy memo ending “regulation by prosecution” for digital asset actors, refocusing on fraud and illicit finance and aligning enforcement with executive directives, and the Acting Chairman of the CFTC directed staff to follow the DOJ’s new policy, pausing certain prosecutions. In July 2025, BlockFi reached a $35 million settlement with the DOJ, clearing legal hurdles for creditor distributions. In response to these events (collectively, the “2022 Events”), the digital asset markets have experienced extreme price volatility and other entities in the digital asset industry have been, and may continue to be, negatively affected, further undermining confidence in the digital asset markets. These events have also negatively impacted the liquidity of the digital asset markets as certain entities affiliated with FTX engaged in significant trading activity. If the liquidity of the digital asset markets continues to be negatively impacted by these events, digital asset prices, including bitcoin, may continue to experience significant volatility or price declines and confidence in the digital asset markets may be further undermined. In addition, regulatory and enforcement scrutiny has increased, including from, among others, the Department of Justice, the SEC, the CFTC, the White House and Congress, as well as state regulators and authorities, and the digital asset industry remains subject to significant attention from regulators, legislators and policymakers. These
| 14 |
events are continuing to develop and the full facts are continuing to emerge. It is not possible to predict at this time all of the risks that they may pose to the Trust, its service providers or to the digital asset industry as a whole.
The prices of some digital assets, including bitcoin, have fluctuated significantly following the 2024 election of Donald Trump as president of the United States. Industry participants generally expect the administration to continue to take a constructive approach toward the digital asset industry. Through his executive orders, President Trump has indicated that the administration will work toward providing greater regulatory clarity for blockchain technology and digital assets, thereby fostering their development in the United States. Similarly, the digital asset industry expects favorable legislation from the U.S. Congress, as certain members have expressed interest in advancing digital asset specific legislation. There can be no assurance that market expectations around future activity by the administration or Congress will be fulfilled, or that digital asset prices will rise or maintain their current levels. Some commentators have referred to the digital asset market post-President Trump’s election as a bubble. There can be no assurance that such a bubble does not exist. The failure of the administration and Congress to provide the expected level of regulatory clarity and support for blockchain technology and digital assets, could lead to a decline in digital asset prices, including bitcoin. Such a decline could cause a decline in the value of our Shares and cause our Shareholders to suffer losses. Moreover, there can be no assurance that political dynamics and sentiments toward the digital asset industry, or market perceptions of those sentiments, will not unfavorably shift over time. Extreme volatility in the future, including further declines in the trading prices of bitcoin, could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Shares, and could lose all or substantially all of their value.
In addition, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act of 2025 (“GENIUS Act”), which establishes a federal framework for payment stablecoins, was enacted in July 2025. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (the “CLARITY Act”), which is intended to establish a federal market-structure framework for certain digital assets, passed the U.S. House of Representatives in July 2025 and was advanced by the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs in May 2026. In July 2026, Senate Republicans released updated bill text, but the CLARITY Act has not been enacted and its prospects remain uncertain. Delays in, changes to, or adverse developments relating to implementation of the GENIUS Act, enactment of the CLARITY Act or similar legislation, or other federal or state regulatory actions could negatively affect market sentiment, liquidity, trading activity, or the prices of digital assets, including bitcoin. Any resulting decline in the price of bitcoin could cause a reduction in the value of the Shares and cause Shareholders to suffer losses.
On March 6, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order for the “Establishment of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and United States Digital Asset Stockpile” (the “Order”). The Order requires the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury to establish two offices to administer and maintain a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve” (the “Bitcoin Reserve”) and a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile (the “Digital Asset Stockpile”), respectively. The Bitcoin Reserve will be capitalized with bitcoin forfeited as part of U.S. criminal or civil proceedings or in satisfaction of penalties imposed by executive agencies. The Digital Asset Stockpile will be capitalized initially with other digital assets forfeited as part of criminal or civil asset forfeiture proceedings. This development has led to expectations within the bitcoin market that the United States may begin acquiring and holding bitcoin. The Order directs the Secretaries of the U.S. Treasury Department and the U.S. Department of Commerce to develop budget-neutral strategies for acquiring additional bitcoin for the Bitcoin Reserve. Legislation has been introduced in the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives, which would direct the acquisition of one million bitcoin by the federal government over a five-year period, which would be held in trust in secure storage by the U.S. Treasury. The bill proposes to fund the bitcoin acquisition using remittances from the Federal Reserve, revaluations of Federal Reserve gold certificates, and other funding mechanisms. Bills have also been introduced in several state legislatures to authorize the acquisition of bitcoin by state governments or their instrumentalities, some of which have failed to pass. In May 2026, legislation styled the American Reserve Modernization Act of 2026 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives, which would, among other things, establish the Bitcoin Reserve and a digital asset stockpile in statute and require the consolidation of digital assets held by federal agencies within the U.S. Department of the Treasury. As of the date of this report, these initiatives remain subject to significant uncertainty. If now or in the future, the U.S. federal government or any state government or any instrumentality thereof does not announce bitcoin acquisition plans or does announce such plans, but these plans fall short of market expectations, the price of bitcoin may decline, which may impact Share value. Even if government acquisitions occur or if legislation requiring acquisitions is enacted, the price of bitcoin may decline if there are implementation challenges, unexpected difficulties, policy or legal reversals, or changes in political priorities, any of which may negatively impact Share value. Further, executive orders, such as the Order, are subject to change and can be reversed or overturned. The enduring existence and size of the Bitcoin Reserve and Digital Asset Stockpile, and the passage and implementation of legislation at the federal or state level, are subject to complex challenges and uncertainty that makes it difficult to evaluate their effect on the value of bitcoin and the Shares, now or in the future. Extreme volatility in the future, including further declines in the trading prices of bitcoin, could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Shares and the Shares could lose all or substantially all of their value. The Trust is not actively managed and will not take any actions to take advantage, or mitigate the impacts, of volatility in the price of bitcoin.
| 15 |
Digital Asset Markets In The United States Exist In A State Of Regulatory Uncertainty, And Adverse Legislative Or Regulatory Developments Could Significantly Harm The Value Of Bitcoin Or The Shares, Such As By Banning, Restricting Or Imposing Onerous Conditions Or Prohibitions On The Use Of Bitcoins, Mining Activity, Digital Wallets, The Provision Of Services Related To Trading And Providing Custody Services For Bitcoin, The Operation Of The Bitcoin Network, Or The Digital Asset Markets Generally
There is a lack of consensus regarding the regulation of digital assets, including bitcoin, and their markets. As a result of the growth in the size of the digital asset market, as well as the 2022 Events, the U.S. Congress and a number of U.S. federal and state agencies (including FinCEN, SEC, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), CFTC, FINRA, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), state financial institution regulators, and others) have been examining the operations of digital asset networks, digital asset users and the digital asset markets. Congress is currently considering several bills relating to the regulation of digital assets and stablecoins, which may not pass and be enacted in their present form or at all. Many state and federal agencies have brought enforcement actions or issued consumer advisories regarding the risks posed by digital assets to investors. Ongoing and future regulatory actions with respect to digital assets generally or bitcoin in particular may alter, perhaps to a materially adverse extent, the nature of an investment in the Shares or the ability of the Trust to continue to operate.
The 2022 Events, including among others the bankruptcy filings of FTX and its subsidiaries, Three Arrows Capital, Celsius Network, Voyager Digital, Genesis, BlockFi and others, and other developments in the digital asset markets, have resulted in calls for heightened scrutiny and regulation of the digital asset industry, with a specific focus on intermediaries such as digital asset exchanges and custodians. Federal and state legislatures and regulatory agencies may introduce and enact new laws and regulations to regulate crypto asset intermediaries, such as digital asset exchanges and custodians. The March 2023 collapses of Silicon Valley Bank, Silvergate Bank, and Signature Bank, which in some cases provided services to the digital asset industry, may amplify and/or accelerate these trends.
U.S. federal and state regulators, as well as the White House, have issued reports and releases concerning crypto assets, including bitcoin and crypto asset markets. Further, in 2023 the House of Representatives formed two new subcommittees: the Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion Subcommittee and the Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development Subcommittee, each of which were formed in part to analyze issues concerning crypto assets and demonstrate a legislative intent to develop and consider the adoption of federal legislation designed to address the perceived need for regulation of and concerns surrounding the crypto industry. However, the extent and content of any forthcoming laws and regulations are not yet ascertainable with certainty, and it may not be ascertainable in the near future. The impact of these and other related events on the Trust, the digital asset industry, and the value of the Shares cannot be predicted.
There remains substantial uncertainty regarding the regulation of digital assets, including bitcoin, and their markets, notwithstanding certain recent federal interpretive actions intended to provide additional clarity. On March 17, 2026, the SEC issued an interpretive release (the “Interpretive Release”) regarding the application of the federal securities laws to certain types of digital assets and certain transactions involving digital assets, and the CFTC concurrently provided guidance that it and its staff will administer the Commodity Exchange Act consistent with that interpretation. Among other things, the Interpretive Release introduces a taxonomy for crypto assets; addresses how a non-security crypto asset may become subject to, and may cease to be subject to, an investment contract; and clarifies the application of the federal securities laws to airdrops, protocol mining, protocol staking and the wrapping of a non-security crypto asset. Although the March 17, 2026 interpretive guidance may provide greater clarity in certain respects, this guidance is not binding law, may be revised, and does not eliminate uncertainty, particularly with respect to the regulatory treatment of specific activities or transactions involving crypto assets.In August 2021, the chair of the SEC stated that he believed investors using digital asset trading platforms are not adequately protected, and that activities on the platforms can implicate the securities laws, commodities laws and banking laws, raising a number of issues related to protecting investors and consumers, guarding against illicit activity, and ensuring financial stability. The chair expressed a need for the SEC to have additional authorities to prevent transactions, products, and platforms from “falling between regulatory cracks,” as well as for more resources to protect investors in “this growing and volatile sector.” The chair called for federal legislation centering on digital asset trading, lending, and decentralized finance platforms, seeking “additional plenary authority” to write rules for digital asset trading and lending. It is not possible to predict whether, or when, any of these developments will lead to Congress granting additional authorities to the CFTC, SEC or other regulators, what the nature of such additional authorities might be, how additional legislation and/or regulatory oversight might impact the ability of digital asset markets to function or how any new regulations or changes to existing regulations might impact the value of digital assets generally and bitcoin held by the Trust specifically. The consequences of increased federal regulation of digital assets and digital asset activities could have a material adverse effect on the Trust and the Shares.
| 16 |
FinCEN requires any administrator or exchanger of convertible virtual currency (“CVC”) to register with FinCEN as a money transmitter and comply with the anti- money laundering regulations applicable to money transmitters. Entities which fail to comply with such regulations are subject to fines, may be required to cease operations, and could have potential criminal liability. For example, in 2015, FinCEN assessed a $700,000 fine against a sponsor of a digital asset for violating several requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act by acting as an MSB and selling the digital asset without registering with FinCEN, and by failing to implement and maintain an adequate anti-money laundering program. In 2017, FinCEN assessed a $110,000,000 fine against BTC-e, a now defunct digital asset exchange, for similar violations. The requirement that exchangers that do business in the United States register with FinCEN and comply with anti- money laundering regulations may increase the cost of buying and selling bitcoin and therefore may adversely affect the price of bitcoin and an investment in the Shares.
The Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury Department”) has added digital currency addresses, including addresses on the Bitcoin Blockchain, to the list of Specially Designated Nationals whose assets are blocked, and with whom U.S. persons are generally prohibited from dealing. Such actions by OFAC, or by similar organizations in other jurisdictions, may introduce uncertainty in the market as to whether bitcoin that has been associated with such addresses in the past can be easily sold. This “tainted” bitcoin may trade at a substantial discount to untainted bitcoin. Reduced fungibility in the bitcoin markets may reduce the liquidity of bitcoin and therefore adversely affect their price.
In February 2020, then-U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin stated that digital assets were a “crucial area” on which the U.S. Treasury Department has spent significant time. Secretary Mnuchin announced that the U.S. Treasury Department is preparing significant new regulations governing digital asset activities to address concerns regarding the potential use for facilitating money laundering and other illicit activities. In December 2020, FinCEN, a bureau within the U.S. Treasury Department, proposed a rule that would require financial institutions to submit reports, keep records, and verify the identity of customers for certain transactions to or from so-called “unhosted” wallets, also commonly referred to as self-hosted wallets. In January 2021, then U.S. Treasury Secretary nominee Janet Yellen stated her belief that regulators should “look closely at how to encourage the use of digital assets for legitimate activities while curtailing their use for malign and illegal activities.”
Under regulations from the New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”), businesses involved in digital asset business activity for third parties in or involving New York, excluding merchants and consumers, must apply for a license, commonly known as a BitLicense, from the NYDFS and must comply with anti-money laundering, cybersecurity, consumer protection, and financial and reporting requirements, among others. As an alternative to a BitLicense, a firm can apply for a charter to become a limited purpose trust company under New York law qualified to engage in certain digital asset business activities. Other states have considered or approved digital asset business activity statutes or rules, passing, for example, regulations or guidance indicating that certain digital asset business activities constitute money transmission requiring licensure.
The inconsistency in applying money transmitting licensure requirements to certain businesses may make it more difficult for these businesses to provide services, which may affect consumer adoption of bitcoin and its price. In an attempt to address these issues, the Uniform Law Commission passed a model law in July 2017, the Uniform Regulation of Virtual Currency Businesses Act, which has many similarities to the BitLicense and features a multistate reciprocity licensure feature, wherein a business licensed in one state could apply for accelerated licensure procedures in other states. It is still unclear, however, how many states, if any, will adopt some or all of the model legislation.
Law enforcement agencies have often relied on the transparency of blockchains to facilitate investigations. However, certain privacy-enhancing features have been, or are expected to be, introduced to a number of digital asset networks. If the Bitcoin network were to adopt any of these privacy-enhancing features, these features may provide law enforcement agencies with less visibility into transaction-level data. Europol, the European Union’s law enforcement agency, released a report in October 2017 noting the increased use of privacy-enhancing digital assets like Zcash and Monero in criminal activity on the internet. In May 2022, OFAC banned all U.S. persons from using Blender.io, a digital asset mixing application that operates on the Bitcoin Blockchain to obfuscate the origin, destination and counterparties of blockchain transactions, by adding certain digital asset wallet addresses associated with Blender.io to its Specially Designated Nationals list. Blender.io receives a variety of transactions and mixes them together before transmitting them to their ultimate destinations. On March 23, 2022, Lazarus Group, a state-sponsored cyber hacking group associated with North Korea, carried out a major virtual currency heist from a blockchain project linked to the online game Axie Infinity; Blender.io was used in processing some of the illicit proceeds. The U.S. Treasury Department’s press release announcing the sanctions on Blender.io observed that, while most virtual currency activity is licit, virtual currency can be used for illicit activity, including sanctions evasion, through mixers, peer-to-peer exchangers, darknet markets, and exchanges. This includes the facilitation of heists, ransomware schemes, and other cybercrimes. On October 19, 2023, FinCEN published proposed rulemaking to apply the authorities in Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act to impose requirements on financial institutions that engage in CVC transactions with CVC mixers. The proposed rule, if adopted, would
| 17 |
require covered financial institutions to report to FinCEN any CVC transactions they process that involves CVC mixing within or involving a jurisdiction outside the United States. The term “CVC mixing” covers more than just transactions that involve CVC mixers like Tornado Cash, and seemingly could cover a broader range of conduct involving technologies, services, or methods that have the effect of obfuscating the source, destination, or amount of a CVC transaction, whether or not the obfuscation was intentional. If the rule were to be adopted as proposed and if the Bitcoin Blockchain were to be deemed to or were to adopt features which come within the rule’s ambit, it could cause covered financial institutions - such as many digital asset platforms, or the Trust’s service providers, such as the Cash Custodian - to reduce support for or cease offering services for bitcoin or to the Trust, which could impair the utility of bitcoin, the value of the Shares and the Trust’s ability to operate in compliance with new laws and regulations.
A determination that bitcoin or any other digital asset is a “security” may adversely affect the value of bitcoin and the value of the Shares, and result in potentially extraordinary, nonrecurring expenses to, or termination of, the Trust.
Depending on its characteristics, a digital asset may be considered a “security” under the federal securities laws. The test for determining whether a particular digital asset is a “security” is complex and difficult to apply, and the outcome is difficult to predict. Although certain public statements by SEC officials have suggested that bitcoin may not be treated as a security, such statements are non-binding and subject to change, and regulatory authorities or courts may reach a different conclusion.
Whether a digital asset is a security under the federal securities laws depends on whether it is included in the lists of instruments making up the definition of “security” in the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the Investment Company Act. Digital assets as such do not appear in any of these lists, although each list includes the terms “investment contract” and “note,” and the SEC has typically analyzed whether a particular digital asset is a security by reference to whether it meets the tests developed by the federal courts interpreting these terms, known as the Howey and Reves tests, respectively. For many digital assets, whether or not the Howey or Reves tests are met is difficult to resolve definitively, and substantial legal arguments can often be made both in favor of and against a particular digital asset qualifying as a security under one or both of the Howey and Reves tests. Adding to the complexity, the SEC staff has indicated that the security status of a particular digital asset can change over time as the relevant facts evolve.
In the Interpretive Release, the SEC stated that, based on its current understanding of the digital asset markets, bitcoin is a “digital commodity” and not itself a security. Although the Interpretive Release represents the official position of the SEC, it is not itself a statute or binding rule, does not supersede or replace the Howey test, is based on the SEC’s current understanding of the digital asset markets, and may be refined, revised or expanded. In addition, a court, regulator, or future administration could take a different view, and future legislation, rulemaking, enforcement positions, judicial decisions or other developments could result in bitcoin, the Trust, the Shares or transactions involving bitcoin being treated differently than contemplated by the Interpretive Release. Any such developments could adversely affect the Trust and the value of the Shares.
As part of determining whether bitcoin is a security for purposes of the federal securities laws, the Sponsor takes into account a number of factors, including the various definitions of “security” under the federal securities laws and federal court decisions interpreting elements of these definitions, such as the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in the Howey and Reves cases, as well as reports, orders, press releases, public statements and speeches by the SEC and its staff providing guidance on when a digital asset may be a security for purposes of the federal securities laws, and other materials relevant to the status of bitcoin as a security (or not). Finally, the Sponsor discusses the security status of bitcoin with its securities lawyers. Through this process the Sponsor believes that it is applying the proper legal standards in making a good faith determination that it believes bitcoin is not presently a security under the federal law notwithstanding the uncertainties inherent in the Howey and Reves tests. However, because of these uncertainties and the fact-based nature of the analysis, the Sponsor acknowledges that notwithstanding the SEC’s characterization of bitcoin as a digital commodity in the Interpretive Release, bitcoin may in the future be found by the SEC or a federal court to be a security under the federal securities laws notwithstanding the Sponsor’s prior conclusion; and the Sponsor’s prior conclusion, even if reasonable under the circumstances and made in good faith, would not preclude legal or regulatory action based on the presence of a security.
The Sponsor may dissolve the Trust if the Sponsor determines bitcoin is a security under the federal securities laws, whether that determination is initially made by the Sponsor itself, or because the SEC or a federal court subsequently makes that determination. Because the legal tests for determining whether a digital asset is or is not a security often leave room for interpretation, for so long as the Sponsor believes there to be good faith grounds to conclude that the Trust’s bitcoin is not a security, the Sponsor does not intend to dissolve the Trust on the basis that bitcoin could at some future point be determined to be a security.
Any enforcement action by the SEC or a state securities regulator asserting that bitcoin is a security, or a court decision to that effect, would be expected to have an immediate material adverse impact on the trading value of bitcoin, as well as the Shares. This is because bitcoin and related infrastructure, including exchanges, custodians, and trading venues, currently operate outside the securities regulatory
| 18 |
framework, and a determination that bitcoin is a security would require compliance with regulations — including registration, disclosure, and trading requirements — with which participants in the bitcoin market are not currently structured to comply.
If a digital asset is determined or asserted to be a security, it is likely to become difficult or impossible for the digital asset to be traded, cleared or custodied in the United States through the same channels used by non-security digital assets, which in addition to materially and adversely affecting the trading value of the digital asset is likely to significantly impact its liquidity and market participants’ ability to convert the digital asset into U.S. dollars. For example, in 2020 the SEC filed a complaint against the issuer of XRP, Ripple Labs, Inc., and two of its executives, alleging that they raised more than $1.3 billion through XRP sales that should have been registered under the federal securities laws, but were not. In the years prior to the SEC’s action, XRP’s market capitalization at times reached over $140 billion. However, in the weeks following the SEC’s complaint, XRP’s market capitalization fell to less than $10 billion, which was less than half of its market capitalization in the days prior to the complaint. Although the SEC and Ripple reached a settlement in August 2025 to resolve the enforcement action and to dismiss their respective court appeals, which has largely been viewed as positive in the digital assets market, there remains continued uncertainty as to the regulatory framework that will be applied by the SEC and courts to digital assets. Such uncertainty may remain until legislation providing a regulatory framework is adopted. There is currently legislation being considered that addresses this regulatory uncertainty, most notably the CLARITY Act, but it is unclear if such legislation will be enacted.
In addition, if bitcoin is determined to be a security, the Trust could be considered an unregistered “investment company” under SEC rules, which could necessitate the Trust’s liquidation. In this case, the Trust and the Sponsor may be deemed to have participated in an illegal offering of securities and there is no guarantee that the Sponsor will be able to register the Trust under the Investment Company Act at such time or take such other actions as may be necessary to ensure the Trust’s activities comply with applicable law, which could force the Sponsor to liquidate the Trust.
Moreover, whether or not the Sponsor or the Trust were subject to additional regulatory requirements as a result of any SEC or federal court determination that its assets include securities, the Sponsor may nevertheless decide to terminate the Trust, in order, if possible, to liquidate the Trust’s assets while a liquid market still exists. For example, in response to the SEC’s action against the issuer of XRP, certain significant market participants announced they would no longer support XRP and announced measures, including the delisting of XRP from major digital asset trading platforms. The sponsor of the Grayscale XRP Trust subsequently dissolved this trust and liquidated its assets. If the SEC or a federal court were to determine that bitcoin is a security, it is likely that the value of the Shares would decline significantly, and that the Trust itself may be terminated and, if practical, its assets liquidated.
Future Legal Or Regulatory Developments May Negatively Affect The Value Of Bitcoin Or Require The Trust Or The Sponsor To Become Registered With The SEC Or CFTC, Which May Cause The Trust To Liquidate.
Current and future legislation, SEC and CFTC rulemaking, and other regulatory developments may impact the manner in which bitcoin are treated for classification and clearing purposes. In particular, although the Interpretive Release classified bitcoin as a digital commodity and not a security under the federal securities laws, bitcoin may nonetheless in the future be classified by the CFTC as a “commodity interest” under the CEA. Alternatively, in the future a court or a future SEC administration could conclude that bitcoin is a “security” under U.S. federal securities laws. The Sponsor and the Trust cannot be certain as to how future regulatory developments will impact the treatment of bitcoin under the law. In the face of such developments, the required registrations and compliance steps may result in extraordinary, nonrecurring expenses to the Trust. If the Sponsor decides to terminate the Trust in response to the changed regulatory circumstances, the Trust may be dissolved or liquidated at a time that is disadvantageous to Shareholders.
The SEC has stated that certain digital assets may be considered “securities” under the federal securities laws. The test for determining whether a particular digital asset is a “security” is complex and the outcome is difficult to predict. If bitcoin is in the future determined to be a “security” under federal or state securities laws by the SEC or any other agency, or in a proceeding in a court of law or otherwise, it would likely have material adverse consequences for the value of bitcoin. For example, it may become more difficult or impossible for bitcoin to be traded, cleared and custodied in the United States as compared to other digital assets that are not considered to be securities, which could in turn negatively affect the liquidity and general acceptance of bitcoin and cause users to migrate to other digital assets.
To the extent that bitcoin is determined to be a security, the Trust and the Sponsor may also be subject to additional regulatory requirements, including under the 1940 Act, and the Sponsor may be required to register as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). If the Sponsor determines not to comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, the Sponsor will terminate the Trust. Any such termination could result in the liquidation of the Trust’s bitcoin at a time that is disadvantageous to Shareholders.
| 19 |
To the extent that bitcoin is deemed to fall within the definition of a “commodity interest” under the CEA, the Trust and the Sponsor may be subject to additional regulation under the CEA and CFTC regulations. These additional requirements may result in extraordinary, recurring and/or nonrecurring expenses of the Trust, thereby materially and adversely impacting the Shares. If the Sponsor and/or the Trust determines not to comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, the Sponsor may terminate the Trust. Any such termination could result in the liquidation of the Trust’s bitcoin at a time that is disadvantageous to Shareholders.
Rules like those previously proposed by the SEC, that amend the definition of a “qualified custodian” and expand the current custody rule in 406(4)-2 to cover all digital assets, including bitcoin and related advisory activities would likely impose additional regulatory requirements with respect to the custody and storage of digital assets, including bitcoin. The Sponsor is studying the impact that such amendments may have on the Trust and its arrangements with the Bitcoin Custodian and the Additional Bitcoin Custodian. It is possible that such amendments, if adopted, could prevent the Bitcoin Custodian and the Additional Bitcoin Custodian from serving as service providers to the Trust, or require potentially significant modifications to existing arrangements under the Custody Agreement and the Additional Bitcoin Custody Agreement, which could cause the Trust to bear potentially significant increased costs. If the Sponsor is unable to make such modifications or appoint successor service providers to fill the role that the Bitcoin Custodian or the Additional Bitcoin Custodian currently play, the Trust’s operations (including in relation to creations and redemptions of Baskets and the holding of bitcoin) could be negatively affected, the Trust could dissolve (including at a time that is potentially disadvantageous to Shareholders), and the value of the Shares or an investment in the Trust could be affected.
Further, the proposed amendments could have a severe negative impact on the price of bitcoin and therefore the value of the Shares if enacted, by, among other things, making it more difficult for investors to gain access to bitcoin, or causing certain holders of bitcoin to sell their holdings.
If regulatory changes or interpretations of an Authorized Participant’s, Liquidity Provider’s, the Trust’s or the Sponsor’s activities require the regulation of an Authorized Participant, Liquidity Provider, the Trust or the Sponsor as a money service business under the regulations promulgated by FinCEN under the authority of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act or as a money transmitter or digital asset business under state regimes for the licensing of such businesses, an Authorized Participant, Liquidity Provider, the Trust or the Sponsor may be required to register and comply with such regulations, which could result in extraordinary, recurring and/or nonrecurring expenses to the Authorized Participant, Trust or Sponsor or increased commissions for the Authorized Participant’s clients, thereby reducing the liquidity of the Shares.
To the extent that the activities of any Authorized Participant, Liquidity Provider, the Trust or the Sponsor cause it to be deemed a “money services business” under the regulations promulgated by FinCEN under the authority of the BSA, such Authorized Participant, Liquidity Provider, the Trust or the Sponsor may be required to comply with FinCEN regulations, including those that would mandate the Authorized Participant, Liquidity Provider, Trust or the Sponsor to implement anti-money laundering programs, make certain reports to FinCEN and maintain certain records. Similarly, the activities of an Authorized Participant, Liquidity Provider, the Trust or the Sponsor may require it to be licensed as a money transmitter or as a digital asset business, such as under NYDFS’ BitLicense regulation.
Such additional regulatory obligations may cause the Authorized Participant, Liquidity Provider, the Trust or the Sponsor to incur extraordinary expenses. If the Authorized Participant, Liquidity Provider, the Trust or the Sponsor decide to seek the required licenses, there is no guarantee that they will timely receive them. The Authorized Participant or Liquidity Provider may also instead decide to terminate its role as Authorized Participant or Liquidity Provider of the Trust, or the Sponsor may decide to terminate the Trust. Termination by the Authorized Participant may decrease the liquidity of the Shares, which may adversely affect the value of the Shares, and any termination of the Trust in response to the changed regulatory circumstances may be at a time that is disadvantageous to the Shareholders.
Additionally, to the extent the Authorized Participant, Liquidity Provider, the Trust or the Sponsor is found to have operated without appropriate state or federal licenses by any regulator or court, it may be subject to investigation, administrative or court proceedings, operating restrictions, and civil or criminal monetary fines and penalties, all of which would harm the reputation of the Authorized Participant, Liquidity Provider, the Trust or the Sponsor, disrupt their operations, and have a material adverse effect on the price of the Shares. Although Liquidity Providers represent to the Trust that they have obtained all necessary governmental licenses in the Liquidity Provider agreements, if such representations prove inaccurate, such Liquidity Providers may suffer adverse consequences and be unable to perform their obligations or engage in bitcoin transactions with the Trust, or the Trust’s operations could be adversely affected and decreased liquidity for the Shares or losses for Shareholders could result.
| 20 |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
a) None.
b) Not applicable.
c) 5,900,000 (236 Baskets) were redeemed during the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
| Period | Total Number of Shares Redeemed | Average Price Per Share | ||||||
| 04/01/26 to 04/30/26 | 2,650,000 | $ | 20.63 | |||||
| 05/01/26 to 05/31/26 | 925,000 | 11.39 | ||||||
| 06/01/26 to 06/30/26 | 2,325,00 | 17.74 | ||||||
| Total | 5,900,000 | $ | 18.04 | |||||
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
Item 6. Exhibits.
See the Exhibit Index below, which is incorporated by reference herein.
| Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description |
| 3.1 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Trust incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on August 20, 2024 |
| 3.2 | Certificate of Trust incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by the Registrant on December 30, 2020 |
| 4.1 | Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on March 1, 2024 |
| 4.2 | Amendment No. 1 to the Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on August 20, 2024 |
| 10.1 | Form of Authorized Participant Agreement by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the current report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on November 20, 2025 |
| 10.2 | Form of Marketing Agent Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by the Registrant on October 27, 2023 |
| 10.3 | Form of Custodial Services Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by the Registrant on October 27, 2023 |
| 10.4 | Trust Administration and Accounting Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by the Registrant on December 29, 2023 |
| 21 |
| 10.5 | Transfer Agency Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by the Registrant on December 29, 2023 |
| 10.6 |
Form of Index Sub-Licensing Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by the Registrant on October 27, 2023
|
| 10.7 | Cash Custody Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by the Registrant on December 29, 2023 |
| 10.8 | Subscription Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by the Registrant on December 29, 2023 |
| 10.9 |
Clearing Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by the Registrant on January 8, 2024
|
| 10.10 | Additional Bitcoin Custodian Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on June 26, 2024. |
| 31.1* | Certification by Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 31.2* | Certification by Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 32.1* | Certification by Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 32.2* | Certification by Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 101.INS* | Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document |
| 101.SCH* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema with Embedded Linkbase Documents |
| 104* | Cover Page Interactive Data File included as Exhibit 101 (embedded within the Inline XBRL document) |
* Filed herewith.
| 22 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned in the capacities* indicated thereunto duly authorized.
VANECK DIGITAL ASSETS, LLC
Sponsor of VanEck Bitcoin ETF
| By: | /s/ Jan F. van Eck* | |
| Jan F. van Eck | ||
| President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
| (Principal Executive Officer) | ||
| By: | /s/ John J. Crimmins* | |
| John J. Crimmins | ||
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||
| (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
Date: August 13, 2026
* The Registrant is a trust and the persons are signing in their capacities as officers of VanEck Digital Assets, LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
| 23 |