ICICI Bank (IBN) faces ₹ 16.03 crore West Bengal GST demand order
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
ICICI Bank Limited has received a tax demand order from the Deputy Commissioner of Revenue, West Bengal under Section 73 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The order raises a total Goods and Services Tax (GST) demand of ₹ 16,03,30,178, comprising tax of ₹ 8,67,57,468, interest of ₹ 6,48,96,963 and penalty of ₹ 86,75,747. The demand relates to GST on services provided to customers maintaining specified minimum balances in their accounts, an issue that has also appeared in earlier show cause notices and orders for which the bank is already in litigation, including a writ petition. As the aggregate amount involved now crosses the bank’s materiality threshold, this development is being disclosed, and the bank plans to contest the order through an appeal within the prescribed timelines.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- Material GST demand raised: West Bengal tax authority issued an order under Section 73 of the West Bengal GST Act, 2017 raising a cumulative GST demand of ₹ 16,03,30,178 (tax ₹ 8,67,57,468, interest ₹ 6,48,96,963, penalty ₹ 86,75,747) on services to customers maintaining specified minimum balances, which the bank deems material and is contesting through appeal.
Insights
ICICI Bank faces a material GST demand it plans to appeal.
ICICI Bank Limited has received a GST demand order from the West Bengal tax authority for ₹ 16,03,30,178. This includes tax of ₹ 8,67,57,468, interest of ₹ 6,48,96,963 and penalty of ₹ 86,75,747 linked to services provided to customers maintaining specified minimum balances. The disclosure notes that the cumulative amount tied to this issue has crossed the bank’s internal materiality threshold.
The bank indicates that similar GST questions have arisen in prior show cause notices and orders, which are already under litigation, including a writ petition. This suggests the matter is part of an ongoing interpretive dispute rather than a one-off assessment, but the text does not describe any resolution to date. Financial impact will ultimately depend on outcomes of these legal proceedings and any potential future orders on the same subject.
The bank states it will take appropriate steps and contest the order through an appeal within the prescribed timelines. Until courts or appellate authorities issue decisions, the final liability remains undetermined. Subsequent disclosures in periodic reports or further announcements would be the place where any changes to provisions or confirmed liabilities are likely to be presented.

