INSM Form 144 Filed — 10,000 Shares via Merrill Lynch on NASDAQ
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Form 144 filed for Insmed, Inc. (INSM) reports a proposed sale of 10,000 shares of common stock through Merrill Lynch in Orlando, to be executed on or about 08/12/2025 on NASDAQ with an aggregate market value of $1,215,350. The filing lists total shares outstanding of 211,374,786, which makes the proposed block a very small fraction of the company's capitalization.
The securities to be sold were acquired via stock option transactions reported on 05/18/2018 (6,702 shares) and 05/16/2019 (6,066 shares). Several identifying fields in the filing appear blank or unspecified, and the form includes the standard representation that the seller does not possess undisclosed material adverse information.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- Seller identity not specified in the visible filing fields, reducing transparency about who is proposing the sale.
- Filer contact/CIK and signature/date fields are not provided in the content supplied, limiting verifiability of the notice.
Insights
TL;DR: Proposed sale of 10,000 INSM shares (~0.0047% of outstanding) valued at $1.215M—immaterial to overall capitalization.
The filing shows a small disposition relative to 211,374,786 shares outstanding: 10,000/211,374,786 equals approximately 0.0047% of the float implied by outstanding shares. The broker is listed as Merrill Lynch (Orlando). The reported acquisition lots (6,702 shares from 05/18/2018 and 6,066 shares from 05/16/2019) indicate the seller holds option-derived lots larger than the proposed sale, but the filing does not identify the named seller in the provided fields. From an investor-impact perspective, the size and timing (08/12/2025) make market impact negligible.
TL;DR: Routine Rule 144 notice filed but several identification fields are missing, which reduces transparency for market participants.
The form contains the required Rule 144 representation about absence of undisclosed material adverse information and documents the broker and sale details. However, key identifying fields (the filer CIK/contact info and the "Name of Person for Whose Account" appear blank in the provided content), and signature/date entries are not shown. That limits the utility of the filing for due diligence and public record verification, though it does not alter the factual details of the proposed transaction as reported.