STOCK TITAN

Interparfums (IPAR) replaces Forvis with Grant Thornton amid control weakness

Filing Impact
(Moderate)
Filing Sentiment
(Neutral)
Form Type
8-K

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Interparfums, Inc. changed its independent auditor, with the Audit Committee dismissing Forvis Mazars, LLP and appointing Grant Thornton, LLP effective May 8, 2026. Forvis’ audit reports on the 2025 and 2024 financial statements contained no adverse opinions or qualifications.

The company had previously concluded it did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and Forvis concurred with that assessment. The filing states there were no disagreements with Forvis on accounting, disclosure, or audit scope, and no reportable events other than the previously disclosed material weakness in internal control.

Positive

  • None.

Negative

  • Ongoing internal control weakness: The company and its former auditor both concluded that internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, highlighting a continuing governance and reporting risk.

Insights

Auditor switch follows disclosed internal control weakness but without reported disputes.

Interparfums, Inc. replaced Forvis Mazars, LLP with Grant Thornton, LLP as its independent registered public accounting firm effective May 8, 2026. Forvis’ prior reports on the 2025 and 2024 financial statements were clean, without adverse opinions or scope or principle qualifications.

The company and Forvis both acknowledged a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. The filing notes no disagreements or additional reportable events beyond this weakness, indicating the change was not attributed to disputes over accounting treatment in this disclosure.

Auditor transitions during a period of internal control remediation can draw investor attention because the new firm must assess controls and financial reporting for future periods. Subsequent company filings may outline how Grant Thornton evaluates the existing weakness and any steps taken to strengthen internal controls.

Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant Governance
The company changed its independent auditing firm, which may involve disagreements on accounting matters.
Auditor change effective date May 8, 2026 Effective date of dismissal of Forvis and appointment of Grant Thornton
Fiscal year end with control weakness December 31, 2025 Management concluded internal control over financial reporting was not effective
Prior fiscal year with control weakness December 31, 2024 Internal control over financial reporting also assessed as not effective
independent registered public accounting firm regulatory
"dismissed Forvis Mazars, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm"
An independent registered public accounting firm is an outside accounting company officially registered with the government regulator to examine and report on a public company's financial records and controls. Investors treat its reports like an impartial inspector’s certificate — they add credibility to financial statements, help spot errors or misleading claims, and reduce the risk that shareholders are relying on unchecked or biased numbers.
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting financial
"a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting"
reportable events regulatory
"no reportable events of the type listed in paragraphs (A) through (D)"
Regulation S-K regulatory
"as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K"
A set of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules that tell public companies which narrative and qualitative details must be disclosed in filings, such as risk factors, management discussion, executive pay, legal proceedings and business description. Think of it as a standardized checklist or blueprint that ensures investors get the same types of background information from every company so they can compare risks, management quality and strategy before making investment decisions.
false NY 0000822663 00008226632026-05-082026-05-08

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 8-K

 CURRENT REPORT

 

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): May 8, 2026 

 

Interparfums, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

0-16469

 

13-3275609

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

 

Commission
File Number

 

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

 

551 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10176
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

212.983.2640
(Registrant’s Telephone number, including area code)

 

   (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2 below):

 

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

Soliciting Material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class

 

Trading Symbol(s)

 

Name of each exchange
on which registered

 

 

 

 

 

 Common Stock, $.001 par value per share

 

IPAR

 

The Nasdaq Stock Market

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).

 

Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.





Item 4.01 Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.

 

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) of Interparfums, Inc. (the “Company”) dismissed Forvis Mazars, LLP (“Forvis”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm effective May 8, 2026.


The reports of Forvis on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.


As previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, management concluded that the Company had not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. Forvis concurred with management’s assessment as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.


During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and any subsequent interim period preceding May 8, 2026, there were no disagreements (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) with Forvis on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement(s), if not resolved to the satisfaction of Forvis, would have caused Forvis to make reference thereto in its reports on the Company consolidated financial statements, and no reportable events of the type listed in paragraphs (A) through (D) of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, other than, as previously disclosed in Item 9A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting


On May 8, 2026, the Audit Committee appointed Grant Thornton, LLP (“Grant Thornton”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Commencing with calendar year ended December 31, 2025 through the date of this report, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted Grant Thornton with respect to (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the registrant's financial statements or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as described in Regulation S-K paragraph 304(a)(1)(iv)), or a reportable event (as described in Regulation S-K paragraph 304(a)(1)(v)).


Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits. 


(16) Letter re change in certifying accountant





SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused and authorized this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned.

 

Dated: May 13, 2026

 

 

Interparfums, Inc.

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Michel Atwood

 

 

Michel Atwood

 

 

Chief Financial Officer



FAQ

What change in auditors did Interparfums (IPAR) disclose in this 8-K?

Interparfums, Inc. replaced Forvis Mazars, LLP with Grant Thornton, LLP as its independent auditor effective May 8, 2026. The Audit Committee approved dismissing Forvis and appointing Grant Thornton as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for future financial statement audits.

Did Forvis issue adverse opinions on Interparfums (IPAR) 2025 or 2024 financial statements?

Forvis did not issue adverse opinions or disclaimers on Interparfums’ 2025 and 2024 financial statements. Its reports were not qualified or modified for uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, despite the separately disclosed internal control weakness over financial reporting.

What internal control issue did Interparfums (IPAR) and Forvis identify?

Interparfums and Forvis agreed there was a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. Management concluded controls were not effective, and this assessment was disclosed in the company’s Form 10-K filings for those years.

Were there any disagreements between Interparfums (IPAR) and Forvis leading to the dismissal?

The filing states there were no disagreements with Forvis on accounting principles, disclosure, or audit procedures. It also notes no reportable events under Regulation S-K Item 304, other than the previously disclosed material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.

Did Interparfums (IPAR) consult Grant Thornton before appointing it auditor?

The company did not consult Grant Thornton on accounting principles, specific transactions, or potential audit opinions before the appointment. It also reports no consultations on matters that would have involved disagreements or reportable events under Regulation S-K Item 304.

Filing Exhibits & Attachments

6 documents