JPMorgan sells $1M multi-asset review notes

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (JPM), through JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, is offering $1,000,000 of unsecured Review Notes linked to the J.P.

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (JPM), through JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, is offering $1,000,000 of unsecured Review Notes linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index, due August 15, 2036, fully and unconditionally guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co.

The notes may be automatically called on annual Review Dates starting August 16, 2027 if the Index is at or above 100% of its Initial Value, paying $1,000 plus a growing Call Premium (from 12% up to 120%) per note, after which no further payments are made. The notes pay no interest. If not called, principal is protected only by a 10% buffer; below that, losses are magnified by a 1.11111 downside leverage factor, so investors can lose some or all principal at maturity.

The Index reflects a 1.00% per annum daily deduction and is an excess return, rules-based strategy of futures-based indices across equities, bonds and commodities. Price to public is $1,000 per note, including $10 of selling commissions, for issuer proceeds of $990 per note; the estimated value at pricing was $938.70 per $1,000 note, reflecting embedded costs and JPMS’s internal funding rate.

Key Figures

Offering Size: $1,000,000 Price to Public per Note: $1,000 Selling Commissions per Note: $10 +5 more

8 metrics

Offering Size $1,000,000 Total principal amount of Review Notes offered

Price to Public per Note $1,000 Issue price for each $1,000 principal amount note

Selling Commissions per Note $10 Fees and commissions included in price to public per note

Proceeds to Issuer $990,000 Net proceeds before hedging, $990 per note on $1,000,000 total

Estimated Value per Note $938.70 Estimated value at pricing per $1,000 principal amount note

Buffer Amount 10.00% Index decline tolerated before principal losses at maturity

Downside Leverage Factor 1.11111 Loss multiplier for Index declines beyond the 10% buffer

Index Annual Deduction 1.00% per annum Daily deduction embedded in the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index

Key Terms

Buffer Amount, Downside Leverage Factor, excess return index, contango, +2 more

6 terms

Buffer Amount financial

"If the Final Value is less than the Initial Value by up to the Buffer Amount"

Downside Leverage Factor financial

"Downside Leverage Factor: An amount equal to 1 / (1 -Buffer Amount)"

excess return index financial

"The Index is an “excess return” index because it provides notional exposure"

contango financial

"if the market for the underlying futures contracts is in “contango,”"

Contango is a market situation where contracts to buy a commodity or asset for future delivery trade at higher prices than the current spot price. For investors, contango matters because holding or rolling futures contracts can erode returns — like repeatedly buying a subscription that costs more each renewal — turning a stable underlying price into a gradual loss for funds or traders who must keep extending their positions.

backwardation financial

"if the market for the underlying futures contracts is in “backwardation,”"

A market condition in which contracts to buy a commodity or asset for future delivery are priced lower than contracts for nearer delivery or the current spot price. It matters to investors because backwardation signals strong immediate demand or tight supply, meaning holding or rolling futures can yield different returns — akin to paying more for a concert ticket today than for the same seat months from now because demand is highest now, which affects trading, hedging and short-term price expectations.

Section 871(m) financial

"Section 871(m) of the Code and Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder"

A U.S. tax rule that treats certain payments from financial contracts (like options, swaps, and other instruments that mimic stock dividends) to non-U.S. investors as if they were direct dividends, requiring U.S. withholding tax. It matters to investors because it can reduce net returns on offshore trades that replicate U.S. equity income and may change pricing or counterparty behavior—think of it as a hidden sales tax that applies when a substitute payment acts like a dividend.

Offering Details

shelf · $1,000,000

Offering

Offering Type shelf

Securities Offered Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index due August 15, 2036

Offering Amount $1,000,000

Use of Proceeds Issuer states the notes are offered to meet investor demand for this risk-return profile; original issue price equals estimated value plus selling commissions, projected hedging profits or losses, hedging costs, and any third-party data or platform fees.

FAQ

AI-generated questions and answers. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

What is JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) offering in this 424B2 structured note filing?

JPM is offering $1,000,000 of Review Notes linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index, due August 15, 2036, issued by JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC and fully guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co., with no periodic interest payments.

How does the automatic call feature work on JPM’s Multi-Asset Index Review Notes (JPM)?

On each annual Review Date starting August 16, 2027, if the Index is at or above 100% of the Initial Value, each note is called for $1,000 plus a Call Premium (12% to 120% by schedule), and no further payments are made.

What downside protection and loss risk do these JPM (JPM) notes have?

If not called and the Final Index Value is down by up to the 10% Buffer Amount, investors receive full principal. Below that, losses increase at a 1.11111 Downside Leverage Factor, so a sufficiently large Index decline can cause substantial principal loss at maturity.

What are the fees, proceeds, and estimated value per JPM structured note (JPM)?

Each note is sold at $1,000, including $10 of selling commissions, leaving issuer proceeds of $990 per note. The estimated value at pricing was $938.70 per $1,000 note, reflecting internal funding and hedging costs.

How does the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index underlying JPM’s notes (JPM) operate?

The Index dynamically allocates among 10 futures-based indices in equities, bonds and commodities, targets a volatility threshold starting at 4%, allows capped long and short weights, and applies a 1.00% per annum daily deduction, making it an excess return index.

What is the U.S. federal tax treatment described for these JPM (JPM) notes?

Special tax counsel believes it is reasonable to treat the notes as open transactions (prepaid financial contracts) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, with gains potentially as long-term capital gain if held over a year, though the IRS could assert a different treatment.

Does Section 871(m) withholding apply to these JPM structured notes (JPM) for Non-U.S. Holders?

Based on JPM’s determinations, counsel opines Section 871(m) should not apply to these notes, so dividend equivalent withholding should not be imposed on Non-U.S. Holders, though the IRS could disagree and individual circumstances may affect the analysis.

AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

See more from StockTitan in Google Search and AI answers. Adds StockTitan as a preferred source · opens Google

Add on Google Not now

Available on EDGAR 08/18/2026 - 10:06 AM Accepted by SEC EDGAR 08/14/2026 - 11:02 AM Learn about SEC filing dates

August 12, 2026 Registration Statement Nos. 333-293684 and 333-293684-01; Rule 424(b)(2)
Pricing supplement to product supplement no. 3-I dated April 17, 2026, underlying supplement no. 23-I dated April 17, 2026 and the prospectus and
prospectus supplement, each dated April 17, 2026
JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC
Structured Investments
$1,000,000
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset
Index due August 15, 2036
Fully and Unconditionally Guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co.
• The notes are designed for investors who seek early exit prior to maturity at a premium if, on any Review Date, the
closing level of the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index, which we refer to as the Index, is at or above the Call Value.
• The earliest date on which an automatic call may be initiated is August 16, 2027.
• Investors should be willing to forgo interest payments and be willing to accept the risk of losing some or all of their
principal amount at maturity.
• The Index is subject to a 1.00% per annum daily deduction. As a result of the per annum deduction, the level of
the Index will trail the value of a hypothetical identically constituted notional portfolio from which no such
deduction is made. See “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Notes Generally — The Index is
Subject to a 1.00% per Annum Daily Deduction” in this pricing supplement.
• The notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, which we refer to
as JPMorgan Financial, the payment on which is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Any
payment on the notes is subject to the credit risk of JPMorgan Financial, as issuer of the notes, and the credit
risk of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as guarantor of the notes.
• Minimum denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof
• The notes priced on August 12, 2026 and are expected to settle on or about August 17, 2026.
• CUSIP: 46661KJ33
Investing in the notes involves a number of risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page S-2 of the accompanying
prospectus supplement, “Risk Factors” beginning on page PS-12 of the accompanying product supplement, “Risk
Factors” beginning on page US-4 of the accompanying underlying supplement and “Selected Risk Considerations”
beginning on page PS-6 of this pricing supplement.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved
of the notes or passed upon the accuracy or the adequacy of this pricing supplement or the accompanying product supplement,
underlying supplement, prospectus supplement and prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Price to Public (1)
Fees and Commissions (2)
Proceeds to Issuer
Per note
$1,000
$10
$990
Total
$1,000,000
$10,000
$990,000
(1) See “Supplemental Use of Proceeds” in this pricing supplement for information about the components of the price to public of the
notes.
(2) J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, which we refer to as JPMS, acting as agent for JPMorgan Financial, will pay all of the selling
commissions of $10.00 per $1,000 principal amount note it receives from us to other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers. See “Plan of
Distribution (Conflicts of Interest)” in the accompanying product supplement.
The estimated value of the notes, when the terms of the notes were set, was $938.70 per $1,000 principal amount note.
See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement for additional information.
The notes are not bank deposits, are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency
and are not obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank.

PS-1 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
Key Terms
Issuer: JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, a direct, wholly
owned finance subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Guarantor: JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Index: The J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index (Bloomberg ticker: MAX).
The level of the Index reflects a 1.00% per annum daily deduction.
Call Premium Amount: The Call Premium Amount with respect to
each Review Date is set forth below:
• first Review Date:
12.00% × $1,000
• second Review Date:
24.00% × $1,000
• third Review Date:
36.00% × $1,000
• fourth Review Date:
48.00% × $1,000
• fifth Review Date:
60.00% × $1,000
• sixth Review Date:
72.00% × $1,000
• seventh Review Date:
84.00% × $1,000
• eighth Review Date:
96.00% × $1,000
• ninth Review Date:
108.00% × $1,000
• final Review Date:
120.00% × $1,000
Call Value: 100.00% of the Initial Value
Buffer Amount: 10.00%
Downside Leverage Factor: An amount equal to 1 / (1 -Buffer
Amount), which is 1.11111
Pricing Date: August 12, 2026
Original Issue Date (Settlement Date): On or about August 17,
2026
Review Dates*: August 16, 2027, August 14, 2028, August 13,
2029, August 12, 2030, August 12, 2031, August 12, 2032, August
12, 2033, August 14, 2034, August 13, 2035 and August 12, 2036
(final Review Date)
Call Settlement Dates*: August 19, 2027, August 17, 2028, August
16, 2029, August 15, 2030, August 15, 2031, August 17, 2032,
August 17, 2033, August 17, 2034, August 16, 2035 and the
Maturity Date
Maturity Date*: August 15, 2036
* Subject to postponement in the event of a market disruption event
and as described under “Supplemental Terms of the Notes —
Postponement of a Determination Date — Notes linked solely to the
Index” in the accompanying underlying supplement and “General
Terms of Notes — Postponement of a Payment Date” in the
accompanying product supplement or early acceleration in the event
of an acceleration event as described under “General Terms of
Notes — Consequences of an Acceleration Event” in the
accompanying product supplement and “Selected Risk
Considerations — Risks Relating to the Notes Generally — We May
Accelerate Your Notes If an Acceleration Event Occurs” in this
pricing supplement
Automatic Call:
If the closing level of the Index on any Review Date is greater than
or equal to the Call Value, the notes will be automatically called for
a cash payment, for each $1,000 principal amount note, equal to
(a) $1,000 plus (b) the Call Premium Amount applicable to that
Review Date, payable on the applicable Call Settlement Date. No
further payments will be made on the notes.
Payment at Maturity:
If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final Value
is less than the Initial Value by up to the Buffer Amount, you will
receive the principal amount of your notes at maturity.
If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final Value
is less than the Initial Value by more than the Buffer Amount, your
payment at maturity per $1,000 principal amount note will be
calculated as follows:
$1,000 + [$1,000 × (Index Return + Buffer Amount) × Downside
Leverage Factor]
If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final Value
is less than the Initial Value by more than the Buffer Amount, you
will lose some or all of your principal amount at maturity.
Index Return:
(Final Value – Initial Value)
Initial Value
Initial Value: The closing level of the Index on the Pricing Date,
which was 317.37
Final Value: The closing level of the Index on the final Review
Date

PS-2 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
Supplemental Terms of the Notes
The notes are not futures contracts or swaps and are not regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the
“Commodity Exchange Act”). The notes are offered pursuant to an exemption from regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act,
commonly known as the hybrid instrument exemption, that is available to securities that have one or more payments indexed to the
value, level or rate of one or more commodities, as set out in section 2(f) of that statute. Accordingly, you are not afforded any
protection provided by the Commodity Exchange Act or any regulation promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
The J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
The J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index (the “Index”) was developed and is maintained and calculated by JPMS, one of our affiliates. The
Index is reported by Bloomberg L.P. under the ticker symbol “MAX Index.”
The Index seeks to provide a dynamic and diversified asset allocation based on a momentum investment strategy. The Index tracks
the return of (a) a dynamic notional portfolio consisting of up to 10 excess return futures-based indices (each, a “Constituent” and
collectively, the “Constituents”), converted into U.S. dollars (in the case of Constituents not denominated in U.S. dollars), less (b) a
1.00% per annum daily deduction. The Constituents represent a broad range of asset classes (equities, fixed income and
commodities) and developed markets (the United States, Germany and Japan).
The Index selects and rebalances into a new notional portfolio composed of the Constituents at least once each month using a
methodology that is designed to:
• maintain a diversified allocation at all times;
• allocate dynamically based on the market cycle; and
• select allocations that attempt to deliver a stable volatility over time.
Maintaining a diversified allocation. A diversified portfolio’s return is the weighted average of its constituents’ returns, but its volatility is
less than the weighted average of its constituents’ volatilities, because different assets don’t always move in the same direction — in
this sense, a diversified portfolio can be said to deliver average returns with below-average volatility. In order to ensure diversification,
the Index constitutes its selected portfolio from a universe of 10 Constituents, and imposes caps and floors on the Constituent weights
at the individual and asset class levels. Each Constituent’s assigned weight must also be an increment of 5%, and the assigned
weights must sum to 100%. The following table sets forth the current Constituents, the ticker for each Constituent, the minimum and
maximum assigned weight for each Constituent and the minimum and maximum aggregate assigned weight for each asset class. For
additional information about the Constituents, see “Background on the J.P. Morgan Futures Indices” in the accompanying underlying
supplement.
Constituent
Ticker
Individual
Assigned
Weight
Constraints
Aggregate
Assigned
Weight
Constraints
1
J.P. Morgan US Large Cap Equities Futures Index
JPUSLGEQ
Minimum:
-10%
Maximum:
40%
Minimum:
10%
Maximum:
60%
2
J.P. Morgan US Small Cap Equities Futures Index
JPUSSMEQ
3
J.P. Morgan German Equities Futures Index
JPDEEQ
4
J.P. Morgan Japanese Equities Futures Index
JPJPEQ
5
J.P. Morgan 5Y U.S. Treasury Futures Index
JPUS5YT
Minimum:
-10%
Maximum:
40%
Minimum:
10%
Maximum:
80%
6
J.P. Morgan 10Y U.S. Treasury Futures Index
JPUS10YT
7
J.P. Morgan German Government Bond Futures Index
JPDEBUND
8
J.P. Morgan Japanese Government Bond Futures Index
JPJP10YB
9
J.P. Morgan Brent Crude Oil Futures Index
JPBRENT
Minimum:
-20%
Maximum:
20%
Minimum:
-30%
Maximum:
30%
10
J.P. Morgan Gold Futures Index
JPMGOLD

PS-3 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
Allocating dynamically based on the market cycle. Historical data and statistical analysis support the premise that assets tend to move
in multi-year cycles. Depending on the asset class, these cycles can range from five to 30 years. The presence of these trends is one
possible explanation for the academic research showing that, historically, asset classes exhibiting strong recent returns have been
more likely to continue to exhibit positive returns. The Index attempts to take advantage of this dynamic by identifying a selected
portfolio that reflects the strongest recent returns in local-currency terms from among the possible portfolios that meet the weight
constraints set forth above and the volatility threshold described below.
Targeting stable volatility. One measure of risk used by many investors is volatility, which reflects the degree of variation in the value of
an asset or portfolio over a period of time. Unlike asset-allocation approaches that aim to maintain stable proportions of different assets
throughout the market cycle, the Index attempts to maintain a stable level of volatility over time. As compared to an approach that
maintains consistent weights through the market cycle, the Index is designed to take on more volatility risk in calm markets and deliver
lower volatility in choppy ones.
Identifying a selected portfolio. At least once each month, the Index identifies every notional portfolio that meets the individual
Constituent and asset class weight constraints set forth above with weights in increments of 5% and a total weight of 100% and that
has a recent historical volatility at or below a volatility threshold of 4%. The Index then selects and rebalances into the notional portfolio
from that set with the strongest recent performance in local-currency terms. If no such notional portfolio exists, then the volatility
threshold is increased by 1% (e.g., from 4% to 5%), and the procedure described in this paragraph is repeated, including the increase
to the volatility threshold, until a notional portfolio has been selected.
Calculating the level of the Index. On any given day, the closing level of the Index (the “Index Level”) reflects (a) the weighted U.S.
dollar performance of the Constituents tracked by the Index on that day less (b) the 1.00% per annum daily deduction. The Index Level
was set equal to 100.00 on February 22, 1994, the base date of the Index. The Index Calculation Agent (as defined below) began
calculating the Index on a live basis on November 18, 2022.
The Index is an “excess return” index because it provides notional exposure to the Constituents that in turn provide exposure to futures
contract returns that reflect changes in the price of those futures contracts, as well as their “roll” returns. The Index is not a “total return”
index because the Constituents do not reflect interest that could be earned on funds notionally committed to the trading of futures
contracts.
JPMS is currently the sponsor of the Index (the “Index Sponsor”) and the calculation agent of the Index (the “Index Calculation Agent”).
See “The J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index” in the accompanying underlying supplement for additional information about the Index.
No assurance can be given that the investment strategy used to construct the Index will be successful or that the Index will
outperform any alternative portfolio or strategy that might be constructed from the Constituents. There is no guarantee that
past performance trends referenced in identifying a selected portfolio will continue during the subsequent period when the
Index provides exposure to that selected portfolio. In addition, no assurance can be given that the actual realized volatility of
the Index will approximate 4%. The actual realized volatility of the Index will depend on the performance of the Constituents
included in the selected portfolio(s) from time to time, and, at any time or for extended periods, may be greater than 4%,
perhaps significantly, or less than 4%. Furthermore, the volatility threshold is subject to upward adjustment and, thus, the
realized volatility threshold used to determine any selected portfolio may be greater than 4%, perhaps significantly.
The Index is described as a “notional” or “synthetic” portfolio of assets because there is no actual portfolio of assets to
which any person is entitled or in which any person has any ownership interest. The Index merely references certain assets,
the performance of which will be used as a reference point for calculating the Index Level.

PS-4 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
How the Notes Work
Payment upon an Automatic Call
Payment at Maturity If the Notes Have Not Been Automatically Called
Call Premium Amount
The table below illustrates the Call Premium Amount per $1,000 principal amount note for each Review Date based on the Call
Premium Amounts set forth under “Key Terms — Call Premium Amount” above.
Review Date
Call Premium Amount
First
$120.00
Second
$240.00
Third
$360.00
Fourth
$480.00
Fifth
$600.00
Sixth
$720.00
Seventh
$840.00
Eighth
$960.00
The notes will be automatically called on the applicable Call Settlement Date and you will
receive (a) $1,000 plus (b) the Call Premium Amount applicable to that Review Date.
No further payments will be made on the notes.
Review Dates
Automatic Call
The closing level of the
Index is greater than or
equal to the Call Value.
The closing level of the
Index is less than the
Call Value.
Call
Value
Compare the closing level of the Index to the Call Value on each Review Date until any earlier automatic call.
The notes will not be automatically called. Proceed to the next Review Date, if any.
No Automatic Call
Review Dates
You will receive the principal amount
of your notes.
The notes have not
been automatically
called. Proceed to the
payment at maturity.
Final Review Date Payment at Maturity
The Final Value is less than the Initial Value by up
to the Buffer Amount.
You will receive:
$1,000 + [$1,000 ×(Index Return +
Buffer Amount) x Downside Leverage
Factor]
Under these circumstances, you will
lose some or all of your principal
amount at maturity.
The Final Value is less than the Initial Value by
more than the Buffer Amount.

PS-5 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
Review Date
Call Premium Amount
Ninth
$1,080.00
Final
$1,200.00
Hypothetical Payout Examples
The following examples illustrate payments on the notes linked to a hypothetical Index, assuming a range of performances for the
hypothetical Index on the Review Dates.
In addition, the hypothetical payments set forth below assume the following:
• an Initial Value of 100.00;
• a Call Value of 100.00 (equal to 100.00% of the hypothetical Initial Value);
• a Buffer Amount of 10.00%;
• a Downside Leverage Factor of 1.11111; and
• the Call Premium Amounts set forth under “Key Terms — Call Premium Amount” above.
The hypothetical Initial Value of 100.00 has been chosen for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the actual Initial Value.
The actual Initial Value is the closing level of the Index on the Pricing Date and is specified under “Key Terms — Initial Value” in this
pricing supplement. For historical data regarding the actual closing levels of the Index, please see the historical information set forth
under “Hypothetical Back-Tested Data and Historical Information” in this pricing supplement.
Each hypothetical payment set forth below is for illustrative purposes only and may not be the actual payment applicable to a purchaser
of the notes. The numbers appearing in the following examples have been rounded for ease of analysis.
Example 1 — Notes are automatically called on the first Review Date.
Date
Closing Level
First Review Date
105.00
Notes are automatically called
Total Payment
$1,120.00 (12.00% return)
Because the closing level of the Index on the first Review Date is greater than or equal to the Call Value, the notes will be automatically
called for a cash payment, for each $1,000 principal amount note, of $1,120.00 (or $1,000 plus the Call Premium Amount applicable to
the first Review Date), payable on the applicable Call Settlement Date. No further payments will be made on the notes.
Example 2 — Notes are automatically called on the final Review Date.
Date
Closing Level
First Review Date
80.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Second Review Date
75.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Third through Ninth
Review Dates
Less than Call Value
Notes NOT automatically called
Final Review Date
260.00
Notes are automatically called
Total Payment
$2,200.00 (120.00% return)
Because the closing level of the Index on the final Review Date is greater than or equal to the Call Value, the notes will be automatically
called for a cash payment, for each $1,000 principal amount note, of $2,200.00 (or $1,000 plus the Call Premium Amount applicable to
the final Review Date), payable on the applicable Call Settlement Date, which is the Maturity Date.

PS-6 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
Example 3 — Notes have NOT been automatically called and the Final Value is less than the Initial Value by up to the Buffer
Amount.
Date
Closing Level
First Review Date
80.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Second Review Date
85.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Third through Ninth
Review Dates
Less than Call Value
Notes NOT automatically called
Final Review Date
90.00
Notes NOT automatically called; Final Value is less than Initial
Value by up to Buffer Amount
Total Payment
$1,000.00 (0.00% return)
Because the notes have not been automatically called and the Final Value is less than the Initial Value by up to the Buffer Amount, the
payment at maturity, for each $1,000 principal amount note, will be $1,000.00.
Example 4 — Notes have NOT been automatically called and the Final Value is less than the Initial Value by more than the
Buffer Amount.
Date
Closing Level
First Review Date
80.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Second Review Date
70.00
Notes NOT automatically called
Third through Ninth
Review Dates
Less than Call Value
Notes NOT automatically called
Final Review Date
40.00
Notes NOT automatically called; Final Value is less than Initial
Value by more than Buffer Amount
Total Payment
$444.445 (-55.5555% return)
Because the notes have not been automatically called, the Final Value is less than the Initial Value by more than the Buffer Amount and
the Index Return is -60.00%, the payment at maturity will be $444.445 per $1,000 principal amount note, calculated as follows:
$1,000 + [$1,000 × (-60.00% + 10.00%) × 1.11111] = $444.445
The hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments on the notes shown above apply only if you hold the notes for their entire term
or until automatically called. These hypotheticals do not reflect the fees or expenses that would be associated with any sale in the
secondary market. If these fees and expenses were included, the hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments shown above would
likely be lower.
Selected Risk Considerations
An investment in the notes involves significant risks. These risks are explained in more detail in the “Risk Factors” sections of the
accompanying prospectus supplement, product supplement and underlying supplement.
Risks Relating to the Notes Generally
• YOUR INVESTMENT IN THE NOTES MAY RESULT IN A LOSS —
The notes do not guarantee any return of principal. If the notes have not been automatically called and the Final Value is less than
the Initial Value by more than 10.00%, you will lose 1.11111% of the principal amount of your notes for every 1% that the Final
Value is less than the Initial Value by more than 10.00%. Accordingly, under these circumstances, you will lose some or all of your
principal amount at maturity.
• THE INDEX IS SUBJECT TO A 1.00% PER ANNUM DAILY DEDUCTION —
This per annum deduction will be deducted daily. As a result of the per annum deduction, the level of the Index will trail the value
of a hypothetical identically constituted notional portfolio from which no such deduction is made.
• CREDIT RISKS OF JPMORGAN FINANCIAL AND JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. —
Investors are dependent on our and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s ability to pay all amounts due on the notes. Any actual or potential
change in our or JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s creditworthiness or credit spreads, as determined by the market for taking that credit

PS-7 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
risk, is likely to adversely affect the value of the notes. If we and JPMorgan Chase & Co. were to default on our payment
obligations, you may not receive any amounts owed to you under the notes and you could lose your entire investment.
• AS A FINANCE SUBSIDIARY, JPMORGAN FINANCIAL HAS NO INDEPENDENT ACTIVITIES AND HAS LIMITED ASSETS —
As a finance subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co., we have no independent activities beyond the issuance and administration of
our securities and the collection of intercompany obligations. Aside from the initial capital contribution from JPMorgan Chase &
Co., substantially all of our assets relate to obligations of JPMorgan Chase & Co. to make payments under loans made by us to
JPMorgan Chase & Co. or under other intercompany agreements. As a result, we are dependent upon payments from JPMorgan
Chase & Co. to meet our obligations under the notes. We are not an operating subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and in a
bankruptcy or resolution of JPMorgan Chase & Co. we are not expected to have sufficient resources to meet our obligations in
respect of the notes as they come due. If JPMorgan Chase & Co. does not make payments to us and we are unable to make
payments on the notes, you may have to seek payment under the related guarantee by JPMorgan Chase & Co., and that
guarantee will rank pari passu with all other unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of JPMorgan Chase & Co. For more
information, see “Risk Factors — Holders of securities issued by JPMorgan Financial may be subject to losses if JPMorgan Chase
& Co. were to enter into a resolution” in the accompanying prospectus supplement.
• THE APPRECIATION POTENTIAL OF THE NOTES IS LIMITED TO ANY CALL PREMIUM AMOUNT PAID ON THE NOTES,
regardless of any appreciation of the Index, which may be significant. You will not participate in any appreciation of the Index.
• THE AUTOMATIC CALL FEATURE MAY FORCE A POTENTIAL EARLY EXIT —
If your notes are automatically called, the term of the notes may be reduced to as short as approximately one year. There is no
guarantee that you would be able to reinvest the proceeds from an investment in the notes at a comparable return for a similar
level of risk. Even in cases where the notes are called before maturity, you are not entitled to any fees and commissions described
on the front cover of this pricing supplement.
• THE NOTES DO NOT PAY INTEREST.
• YOU WILL NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO THE CONSTITUENTS, THE FUTURES CONTRACTS UNDERLYING
THE CONSTITUENTS OR THE SECURITIES OR COMMODITIES UNDERLYING THOSE FUTURES CONTRACTS.
• WE MAY ACCELERATE YOUR NOTES IF AN ACCELERATION EVENT OCCURS —
Upon the announcement or occurrence of an acceleration event, we may, in our sole and absolute discretion, accelerate the
payment on your notes and pay you an amount determined by the calculation agent in good faith and in a commercially reasonable
manner by reference to the values of any fixed-income debt component and any derivatives underlying the economic terms of the
notes as of the date of the notice of acceleration. An acceleration event means there is an occurrence of legal or regulatory
changes that the calculation agent determines have interfered with the our or our affiliates’ ability to hedge its obligations under the
notes. If the payment on your notes is accelerated, your investment may result in a loss, and you may not be able to reinvest your
money in a comparable investment. Please see “General Terms of Notes — Consequences of a Commodity Hedging Disruption
Event” in the accompanying product supplement for more information.
• LACK OF LIQUIDITY —
The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange. Accordingly, the price at which you may be able to trade your notes is
likely to depend on the price, if any, at which JPMS is willing to buy the notes. You may not be able to sell your notes. The notes
are not designed to be short-term trading instruments. Accordingly, you should be able and willing to hold your notes to maturity.
Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest
• POTENTIAL CONFLICTS —
We and our affiliates play a variety of roles in connection with the notes. In performing these duties, our and JPMorgan Chase &
Co.’s economic interests are potentially adverse to your interests as an investor in the notes. It is possible that hedging or trading
activities of ours or our affiliates in connection with the notes could result in substantial returns for us or our affiliates while the
value of the notes declines. Please refer to “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest” in the accompanying product
supplement. See also “— Risks Relating to the Index — Our Affiliate, JPMS, Is the Index Sponsor and Index Calculation Agent
and May Adjust the Index in a Way that Affects Its Level” below.
In addition, one of our affiliates, JPMS, is one of the primary dealers through which the U.S. Federal Reserve conducts open-
market purchases and sales of U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities, including U.S. Treasury notes. These activities may
affect the prices and yields on the U.S. Treasury notes, which may in turn affect the levels of two of the Bond Constituents (as

PS-8 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
defined below) and the level of the Index. JPMS has no obligation to take into consideration your interests as a holder of the notes
when undertaking these activities.
• JPMS AND ITS AFFILIATES MAY HAVE PUBLISHED RESEARCH, EXPRESSED OPINIONS OR PROVIDED
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT ARE INCONSISTENT WITH INVESTING IN OR HOLDING THE NOTES, AND MAY DO SO IN
THE FUTURE —
Any research, opinions or recommendations could affect the market value of the notes. Investors should undertake their own
independent investigation of the merits of investing in the notes, the Constituents, the futures contracts in the Constituents and the
securities and commodities underlying those futures contracts.
Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes
• THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES IS LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL ISSUE PRICE (PRICE TO PUBLIC) OF THE
NOTES —
The estimated value of the notes is only an estimate determined by reference to several factors. The original issue price of the
notes exceeds the estimated value of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring and hedging the notes are
included in the original issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions, the projected profits, if any, that our
affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in hedging our obligations under the notes, the estimated cost of hedging our
obligations under the notes and the fees, if any, paid for third-party data analytics and/or electronic platform services. See “The
Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
• THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES DOES NOT REPRESENT FUTURE VALUES OF THE NOTES AND MAY DIFFER
FROM OTHERS’ ESTIMATES —
See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
• THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES IS DERIVED BY REFERENCE TO AN INTERNAL FUNDING RATE —
The internal funding rate used in the determination of the estimated value of the notes may differ from the market-implied funding
rate for vanilla fixed income instruments of a similar maturity issued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. Any difference may
be based on, among other things, our and our affiliates’ view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance,
operational and ongoing liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for the conventional fixed income
instruments of JPMorgan Chase & Co. This internal funding rate is based on certain market inputs and assumptions, which may
prove to be incorrect, and is intended to approximate the prevailing market replacement funding rate for the notes. The use of an
internal funding rate and any potential changes to that rate may have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and any
secondary market prices of the notes. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
• THE VALUE OF THE NOTES AS PUBLISHED BY JPMS (AND WHICH MAY BE REFLECTED ON CUSTOMER ACCOUNT
STATEMENTS) MAY BE HIGHER THAN THE THEN-CURRENT ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES FOR A LIMITED TIME
PERIOD —
We generally expect that some of the costs included in the original issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in
connection with any repurchases of your notes by JPMS in an amount that will decline to zero over an initial predetermined period.
See “Secondary Market Prices of the Notes” in this pricing supplement for additional information relating to this initial period.
Accordingly, the estimated value of your notes during this initial period may be lower than the value of the notes as published by
JPMS (and which may be shown on your customer account statements).
• SECONDARY MARKET PRICES OF THE NOTES WILL LIKELY BE LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL ISSUE PRICE OF THE
NOTES —
Any secondary market prices of the notes will likely be lower than the original issue price of the notes because, among other
things, secondary market prices take into account our internal secondary market funding rates for structured debt issuances and,
also, because secondary market prices may exclude selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if any, estimated hedging
costs and fees, if any, paid for third-party data analytics and/or electronic platform services that are included in the original issue
price of the notes. As a result, the price, if any, at which JPMS will be willing to buy the notes from you in secondary market
transactions, if at all, is likely to be lower than the original issue price. Furthermore, if you sell your notes, you will likely be charged
a commission for secondary market transactions, or the price will likely reflect a dealer discount and/or fees for use of an electronic
platform to facilitate secondary market activity. Any sale by you prior to the Maturity Date could result in a substantial loss to you.
• SECONDARY MARKET PRICES OF THE NOTES WILL BE IMPACTED BY MANY ECONOMIC AND MARKET FACTORS —
The secondary market price of the notes during their term will be impacted by a number of economic and market factors, which
may either offset or magnify each other, aside from the selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if any, estimated hedging

PS-9 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
costs and the level of the Index. Additionally, independent pricing vendors and/or third party broker-dealers may publish a price for
the notes, which may also be reflected on customer account statements. This price may be different (higher or lower) than the
price of the notes, if any, at which JPMS may be willing to purchase your notes in the secondary market. See “Risk Factors —
Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — Secondary market prices of the notes will be
impacted by many economic and market factors” in the accompanying product supplement.
Risks Relating to the Index
• JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. IS CURRENTLY ONE OF THE COMPANIES THAT MAKE UP THE S&P 500® INDEX, THE
REFERENCE INDEX UNDERLYING THE FUTURES CONTRACTS INCLUDED IN ONE OF THE EQUITY CONSTITUENTS (AS
DEFINED BELOW),
but JPMorgan Chase & Co. will not have any obligation to consider your interests in taking any corporate action that might affect
the securities included in the reference index underlying the futures contracts included in that Equity Constituent.
• OUR AFFILIATE, JPMS, IS THE INDEX SPONSOR AND INDEX CALCULATION AGENT AND MAY ADJUST THE INDEX IN A
WAY THAT AFFECTS ITS LEVEL —
JPMS, one of our affiliates, currently acts as the Index Sponsor and the Index Calculation Agent and is responsible for calculating
and maintaining the Index and developing the guidelines and policies governing its composition and calculation. In performing
these duties, JPMS may have interests adverse to the interests of the holders of the notes, which may affect your return on the
notes, particularly where JPMS, as the Index Sponsor and the Index Calculation Agent, is entitled to exercise discretion. The rules
governing the Index may be amended at any time by the Index Sponsor, in its sole discretion. The rules also permit the use of
discretion by the Index Sponsor and the Index Calculation Agent in relation to the Index in specific instances, including, but not
limited to, the determination of whether to replace a Constituent with a substitute or successor upon the occurrence of certain
events affecting that Constituent, the selection of any substitute or successor and the determination of the levels to be used in the
event of market disruptions that affect the ability of the Index Calculation Agent to calculate and publish the levels of the Index and
the interpretation of the rules governing the Index. Although JPMS, acting as the Index Sponsor and the Index Calculation Agent,
will make all determinations and take all action in relation to the Index acting in good faith, it should be noted that JPMS may have
interests adverse to the interests of the holders of the notes and the policies and judgments for which JPMS is responsible could
have an impact, positive or negative, on the level of the Index and the value of your notes.
Although judgments, policies and determinations concerning the Index are made by JPMS, JPMorgan Chase & Co., as the ultimate
parent company of JPMS, ultimately controls JPMS. JPMS has no obligation to consider your interests in taking any actions that
might affect the value of your notes. Furthermore, the inclusion of any Constituent in the Index is not an investment
recommendation by us or JPMS of that Constituent or any of the futures contracts underlying that Constituent.
• AN INVESTMENT IN THE NOTES CARRIES THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE INDEX’S MOMENTUM INVESTMENT
STRATEGY —
The Index construction reflects a momentum investment strategy. Momentum investing generally seeks to capitalize on positive
trends in the returns of financial instruments. As such, the weights of the Constituents in the Index are based in part on the recent
performance of the Constituents. However, there is no guarantee that recent performance trends will continue in the future. In
addition, the caps and floors on the Constituent weights applied at the individual and asset class levels will result in lower weights
for the Constituents with the best recent performance than would be the case if those caps and floors were not applied. Moreover,
the aggregate assigned weights of the J.P. Morgan US Large Cap Equities Futures Index, the J.P. Morgan US Small Cap Equities
Futures Index, the J.P. Morgan German Equities Futures Index and the J.P. Morgan Japanese Equities Futures Index (the “Equity
Constituents”) and the aggregate assigned weights of the J.P. Morgan 5Y U.S. Treasury Futures Index, the J.P. Morgan 10Y U.S.
Treasury Futures Index, the J.P. Morgan German Government Bond Futures Index and the J.P. Morgan Japanese Government
Bond Futures Index (the “Bond Constituents”) will, in each case, not be less than 10%, even in cases where the recent
performance of the Equity Constituents or the Bond Constituents, as applicable, is significantly worse than the recent performance
of the remaining Constituents.
Furthermore, the Index will maintain a 100% net long exposure to the Constituents at all times, even when most or all Constituents
are displaying negative performance. Moreover, once a selected portfolio has been identified and implemented, the Index will track
the performance of the relevant Constituents until the next rebalancing of the Index, even when the performance of those
Constituents is worse than their recent performance, or than the performance of the remaining Constituents.
In addition, due to the Index’s momentum investment strategy, the Index may fail to realize gains that could occur as a result of
obtaining exposures to financial instruments that have experienced returns one direction, but which subsequently experience a

PS-10 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
sudden return in the other direction. As a result, if market conditions do not represent a continuation of prior observed trends, the
level of the Index, which is rebalanced based on prior trends, may decline.
• THE INDEX MAY PERFORM POORLY AT TIMES WHEN THE PHASE OF THE MARKET CYCLE IS CHANGING OR DURING
PERIODS CHARACTERIZED BY SHORT-TERM VOLATILITY —
While historical data and statistical analysis support the premise that assets tend to move in multi-year cycles, performance of
assets will be variable, even within a particular phase of a market cycle, and the nature of a market cycle is such that the
performance of assets will shift from phases of positive performance to phases of negative performance over time. Because the
Index’s strategy is based on momentum investing, the Index may perform poorly during times when a Constituent’s performance is
not consistent with the current phase of the market cycle or when the current phase of the market cycle for that Constituent is
changing. In non-trending, sideways markets, momentum investment strategies are subject to “whipsaws.” A whipsaw occurs
when the market reverses and does the opposite of what is indicated by the trend indicator, resulting in a trading loss during the
particular period. Consequently, the Index may perform poorly in non-trending, “choppy” markets characterized by short-term
volatility.
● BECAUSE THE INDEX MAY INCLUDE NOTIONAL SHORT POSITIONS, THE NOTES MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL
RISKS —
During each rebalancing of the Index, the Index may assign negative weights as low as -10% to one or more of the Equity
Constituents and the Bond Constituents and negative weights as low as -20% to one or both of the J.P. Morgan Brent Crude Oil
Futures Index and the J.P. Morgan Gold Futures Index (the “Commodity Constituents”), thereby providing notional short exposure
to one or more Constituents. Unlike long positions, short positions are subject to unlimited risk of loss because there is no limit on
the appreciation of the price of the relevant asset before the short position is closed. It is possible that a Constituent may
appreciate substantially while the Index is providing a notional short exposure to that Constituent, thus resulting in an adverse
effect on the level of the Index and the value of your notes.
Moreover, if the Index provides both notional long and short exposures to the Constituents, the total long and short exposure to the
Constituents may exceed 100%, perhaps significantly, which increases the risk that the Index will suffer losses, thereby adversely
affecting any payment on the notes and the value of the notes.
• THE INDEX MAY NOT APPROXIMATE ITS INITIAL VOLATILITY THRESHOLD OF 4% —
No assurance can be given that the Index will maintain an annualized realized volatility that approximates its initial volatility
threshold of 4%. The actual realized volatility of the Index will depend on the performance of the Constituents included in the
selected portfolio(s) from time to time, and, at any time or for extended periods, may be greater than 4%, perhaps significantly, or
less than 4%. Furthermore, the volatility threshold of the Index is subject to upward adjustment and, thus, the realized volatility
threshold used to determine any selected portfolio may be greater than 4%, perhaps significantly. While the assigned weights of
the notional portfolio(s) tracked by the Index are based in part on the recent historical volatility of the relevant notional portfolio,
there is no guarantee that trends existing in the relevant measurement periods will continue in the future. The volatility of the
notional portfolio on any day may change quickly and unexpectedly. Accordingly, the actual annualized realized volatility of the
Index on a daily basis may be greater than or less than the volatility threshold used to select the relevant selected portfolio(s),
which may adversely affect the level of the Index and the value of the notes.
In addition, due to the weight constraints applied in constructing the Index, the aggregate assigned weights of the Equity
Constituents will not be less than 10%, even if the Equity Constituents are performing poorly. In general, the Equity Constituents
will tend to receive their minimum weight of 10% during periods when equities are experiencing poor performance or high volatility.
In addition, during periods when equities are experiencing high volatility, the initial volatility threshold, and the actual realized
volatility, may be significantly higher than 4%, even if other assets are not experiencing high volatility.
• A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE INDEX’S EXPOSURE MAY BE ALLOCATED TO THE BOND CONSTITUENTS —
Under normal market conditions, the Equity Constituents and the Commodity Constituents have tended to exhibit realized
volatilities that are higher than the realized volatilities of the Bond Constituents in general over time. As a result, the Index will
generally need to reduce its exposure to the Equity Constituents and the Commodity Constituents in order to satisfy the volatility
threshold. Therefore, the Index may have significant exposure for an extended period of time to the Bond Constituents, and that
exposure may be greater, perhaps significantly greater, than its exposure to the Equity Constituents and the Commodity
Constituents. However, the returns of the Bond Constituents may be significantly lower than the returns of the Equity Constituents
and the Commodity Constituents, and possibly even negative while the returns of the Equity Constituents and the Commodity
Constituents are positive, which will adversely affect the level of the Index and any payment on, and the value of, the notes.

PS-11 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
• THE INDEX IS SUBJECT TO CONCENTRATION RISK IN ITS ALLOCATION AMONG THE CONSTITUENTS —
The strategy employed by the Index involves an asset allocation that imposes certain weight caps and floors that may result in the
Index being allocated to as few as three Constituents, with up to 40% of the Index being allocated to a single Equity Constituent
and/or any single Bond Constituent. Under these circumstances, the Index may face more risks than if it were diversified broadly
over numerous asset classes and geographical regions. Accordingly, the Index may be more adversely affected by negative
economic, political or regulatory occurrences affecting its Constituents and the relevant asset classes than a more broadly
diversified allocation among its Constituents. Additionally, the Index allocation will sometimes result in exposure to only the Equity
Constituents and the Bond Constituents, without any exposure to the Commodity Constituents.
• CHANGES IN THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUENTS MAY OFFSET EACH OTHER —
Because the notes are linked to the Index, which is linked to the performance of the Constituents, which collectively represent a
broad range of asset classes (equities, fixed income and commodities) and developed markets (the United States, Germany and
Japan), price movements between the Constituents representing different asset classes or developed markets may not correlate
with each other. At a time when the value of a Constituent representing a particular asset class or developed market increases,
the value of other Constituents representing a different asset class or developed market may not increase as much or may decline.
Therefore, in calculating the level of the Index, increases in the values of some of the Constituents may be moderated, or more
than offset, by lesser increases or declines in the values of other Constituents. In addition, high correlation during periods of
negative returns among Constituents could have a material adverse effect on the performance of the Index.
● THE INDEX IS AN “EXCESS RETURN” INDEX AND NOT A “TOTAL RETURN” INDEX BECAUSE THE CONSTITUENTS DO
NOT REFLECT INTEREST THAT COULD BE EARNED ON FUNDS NOTIONALLY COMMITTED TO THE TRADING OF
FUTURES CONTRACTS —
Each of the Constituents is an excess return index and not a total return index. The Index, by providing exposure to the
Constituents, is also an excess return index and not a total return index. The return from investing in futures contracts derives from
three sources: (a) changes in the price of the relevant futures contracts (which is known as the “price return”); (b) any profit or loss
realized when rolling the relevant futures contracts (which is known as the “roll return”); and (c) any interest earned on the cash
deposited as collateral for the purchase of the relevant futures contracts (which is known as the “collateral return”).
Some indices, including the Constituents (and indirectly, the Index), that track futures contracts are excess return indices that
measure the returns accrued from investing in uncollateralized futures contracts (i.e., the sum of the price return and the roll return
associated with an investment in futures contracts). By contrast, a total return index, in addition to reflecting those returns, also
reflects interest that could be earned on funds committed to the trading of the underlying futures contracts (i.e., the collateral return
associated with an investment in futures contracts). Investing in the notes will not generate the same return as would be generated
from investing directly in the relevant futures contracts or in a total return index related to those futures contracts.
• HYPOTHETICAL BACK-TESTED DATA RELATING TO THE INDEX DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HISTORICAL DATA AND
ARE SUBJECT TO INHERENT LIMITATIONS —
The hypothetical back-tested performance of the Index set forth under “Hypothetical Back-Tested Data and Historical Information”
in this pricing supplement is purely theoretical and does not represent the actual historical performance of the Index and has not
been verified by an independent third party. Hypothetical back-tested performance measures have inherent limitations. Alternative
modeling techniques might produce significantly different results and may prove to be more appropriate. Past performance, and
especially hypothetical back-tested performance, is not indicative of future results. This type of information has inherent limitations
and you should carefully consider these limitations before placing reliance on such information. Hypothetical back-tested
performance is derived by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model that has been designed with the benefit of
hindsight.
• THE INVESTMENT STRATEGY USED TO CONSTRUCT THE INDEX INVOLVES REGULAR REBALANCING AND
WEIGHTING CONSTRAINTS THAT ARE APPLIED TO THE CONSTITUENTS —
The Constituents are subject to regular rebalancing and weighting constraints applied individually and by asset type. By contrast, a
notional portfolio that does not rebalance monthly and is not subject to any weighting constraints could see greater compounded
gains over time through exposure to a consistently and rapidly appreciating portfolio consisting of the Constituents. Therefore,
your return on the notes may be less than the return you could realize on an alternative investment in the Constituents that is not
subject to regular rebalancing or weighting constraints. No assurance can be given that the investment strategy used to construct
the Index will outperform any alternative investment in the Constituents.

PS-12 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
• A CONSTITUENT MAY BE REPLACED BY A SUBSTITUTE INDEX UPON THE OCCURRENCE OF CERTAIN
EXTRAORDINARY EVENTS —
Following the occurrence of certain extraordinary events with respect to a Constituent, the affected Constituent may be replaced by
a substitute index or the Index Calculation Agent may cease calculation and publication of the Index on a date determined by the
Index Calculation Agent. These extraordinary events generally include events that could materially interfere with the ability of
market participants to transact in, or events that could materially change the underlying economic exposure of, positions with
respect to the Index, any Constituent or any reference index, where that material interference or change is not acceptable to the
Index Calculation Agent. If the Index Calculation Agent determines in its discretion that no suitable substitute is available for an
affected Constituent, then the Index Calculation Agent will determine its good faith estimate of the closing level of that Constituent
and remove it from the Index. In any such case, the Index Calculation Agent will, in good faith, make related adjustments to the
rules governing the Index that it determines to be appropriate. See “The J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index — Succession and
Extraordinary Events” in the accompanying underlying supplement for a summary of events that could trigger an extraordinary
event.
You should realize that the changing of a Constituent may affect the performance of the Index, and therefore, the return on the
notes, as the replacement Constituent may perform significantly better or worse than the original Constituent. Moreover, the
policies of the sponsor of the substitute index concerning the methodology and calculation of the substitute index, including
decisions regarding additions, deletions or substitutions of the assets underlying the substitute index, could affect the level of the
substitute index and therefore the value of the notes. The amount payable on the notes and their market value could also be
affected if the sponsor of a substitute index or the sponsor of the reference index discontinues or suspends calculation or
dissemination of the index, in which case it may become difficult to determine the market value of the notes. The sponsor of the
substitute index will have no obligation to consider your interests in calculating or revising such substitute index.
● THE CONSTITUENTS ARE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH FUTURES CONTRACTS —
Each Constituent tracks the returns of futures contracts. The price of a futures contract depends not only on the price of the
underlying asset referenced by the futures contract, but also on a range of other factors, including but not limited to changing
supply and demand relationships, interest rates, governmental and regulatory policies and the policies of the exchanges on which
the futures contracts trade. In addition, the futures markets are subject to temporary distortions or other disruptions due to various
factors, including the lack of liquidity in the markets, the participation of speculators and government regulation and intervention.
These factors and others can cause the prices of futures contracts to be volatile and could adversely affect the level of the Index
and any payments on, and the value of, your notes.
• SUSPENSION OR DISRUPTIONS OF MARKET TRADING IN FUTURES CONTRACTS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE
VALUE OF YOUR NOTES —
Futures markets are subject to temporary distortions or other disruptions due to various factors, including lack of liquidity, the
participation of speculators, and government regulation and intervention. In addition, futures exchanges generally have regulations
that limit the amount of futures contract price fluctuations that may occur in a single day. These limits are generally referred to as
“daily price fluctuation limits” and the maximum or minimum price of a contract on any given day as a result of these limits is
referred to as a “limit price.” Once the limit price has been reached in a particular contract, no trades may be made at a price
beyond the limit, or trading may be limited for a set period of time. Limit prices have the effect of precluding trading in a particular
contract or forcing the liquidation of contracts at potentially disadvantageous times or prices. These circumstances could delay the
calculation of the levels of the Constituents and the level of the Index and could affect the levels of the Constituents and adversely
affect the level of the Index and any payments on, and the value of, your notes.
• AN INCREASE IN THE MARGIN REQUIREMENTS FOR FUTURES CONTRACTS INCLUDED IN THE CONSTITUENTS MAY
ADVERSELY AFFECT THE LEVEL OF THAT CONSTITUENT —
Futures exchanges require market participants to post collateral in order to open and keep open positions in futures contracts. If
an exchange increases the amount of collateral required to be posted to hold positions in futures contracts underlying the
Constituents, market participants who are unwilling or unable to post additional collateral may liquidate their positions, which may
cause the price of the relevant futures contracts to decline significantly. As a result, the level of the Index and any payments on,
and the value of, the notes may be adversely affected.
• THE CONSTITUENTS MAY IN THE FUTURE INCLUDE CONTRACTS THAT ARE NOT TRADED ON REGULATED FUTURES
EXCHANGES —
The Constituents are currently based solely on futures contracts traded on regulated futures exchanges (referred to in the United
States as “designated contract markets”). If these exchange-traded futures contracts cease to exist, or if the calculation agent for

PS-13 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
the Constituents substitutes a futures contract in certain circumstances, the Index may in the future include futures contracts or
over-the-counter contracts traded on trading facilities that are subject to lesser degrees of regulation or, in some cases, no
substantive regulation. As a result, trading in such contracts, and the manner in which prices and volumes are reported by the
relevant trading facilities, may not be subject to the provisions of, and the protections afforded by, the U.S. Commodity Exchange
Act, or other applicable statutes and related regulations that govern trading on regulated U.S. futures exchanges or similar statutes
and regulations that govern trading on regulated non-U.S. futures exchanges. In addition, many electronic trading facilities have
only recently initiated trading and do not have significant trading histories. As a result, the trading of contracts on such facilities,
and the inclusion of such contracts in the Index, through its exposure to the Constituents, may be subject to certain risks not
presented by futures contracts traded on regulated futures exchanges, including risks related to the liquidity and price histories of
the relevant contracts.
● CHANGES IN FUTURE PRICES OF THE FUTURES CONTRACTS INCLUDED IN THE CONSTITUENTS RELATIVE TO THEIR
CURRENT PRICES COULD LEAD TO A DECREASE IN ANY PAYMENT ON THE NOTES —
The Constituents are composed of futures contracts. As the contracts underlying the Constituents come to expiration, they are
replaced by contracts that have a later expiration. For example, a contract notionally purchased and held in August may specify an
October expiration. As time passes, the contract expiring in October is replaced by a contract for delivery in November. This is
accomplished by notionally selling the October contract and notionally purchasing the November contract. This process is referred
to as “rolling.” Excluding other considerations, if the market for the underlying futures contracts is in “contango,” where the prices
are higher in the distant delivery months than in the nearer delivery months, the notional purchase of the November contract would
take place at a price that is higher than the price of the October contract, thereby creating a negative “roll yield.” In addition,
excluding other considerations, if the market for the underlying futures contracts is in “backwardation,” where the prices are lower
in the distant delivery months than in the nearer delivery months, the notional purchase of the November contract would take place
at a price that is lower than the price of the October contract, thereby creating a positive “roll yield.”
When the Index provides long exposure to a Constituent, the presence of contango in the relevant markets could adversely affect
the values of that Constituent and the Index and, accordingly, any payment on the notes. In addition, when the Index provides
short exposure to a Constituent, the presence of backwardation in the relevant markets could positively affect the value of that
Constituent and therefore adversely affect the value of the Index and, accordingly, any payment on the notes.
● THE INDEX SHOULD NOT BE COMPARED TO ANY OTHER INDEX OR STRATEGY SPONSORED BY ANY OF OUR
AFFILIATES —
The Index follows a notional rules-based proprietary strategy that may have objectives, features and/or constituents that are similar
to those of another index or strategy sponsored by any of our affiliates (each, a “J.P. Morgan Index”). No assurance can be given
that these similarities will form a basis for comparison between the Index and any other J.P. Morgan Index, and no assurance can
be given that the Index would be more successful than or outperform any other J.P. Morgan Index. The Index operates
independently and does not necessarily revise, enhance, modify or seek to outperform any other J.P. Morgan Index.
● OTHER KEY RISKS:
o THE INDEX MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL OR OUTPERFORM ANY ALTERNATIVE STRATEGY THAT MIGHT BE
EMPLOYED IN RESPECT OF THE CONSTITUENTS.
o THE INDEX COMPRISES NOTIONAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES. THERE IS NO ACTUAL PORTFOLIO OF ASSETS TO
WHICH ANY PERSON IS ENTITLED OR IN WHICH ANY PERSON HAS ANY OWNERSHIP INTEREST.
o THE INDEX, WHICH WAS ESTABLISHED ON NOVEMBER 18, 2022, AND THE CONSTITUENTS, WHICH WERE
ESTABLISHED ON DECEMBER 22, 2020, NOVEMBER 29, 2021 OR OCTOBER 24, 2022, HAVE LIMITED OPERATING
HISTORIES AND MAY PERFORM IN UNANTICIPATED WAYS.
o THE NOTES ARE SUBJECT TO CURRENCY EXCHANGE RISK BECAUSE THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUENTS
DENOMINATED IN CURRENCIES OTHER THAN THE U.S. DOLLAR ARE CONVERTED INTO U.S. DOLLARS FOR
PURPOSES OF CALCULATING THE LEVEL OF THE INDEX.
o THE NOTES ARE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH NON-U.S. SECURITIES MARKETS AND
SMALL-CAPITALIZATION STOCKS.
o THE NOTES ARE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-INCOME SECURITIES, INCLUDING
INTEREST RATE-RELATED RISKS AND CREDIT RISK.
o THE COMMODITY FUTURES CONTRACTS UNDERLYING THE COMMODITY CONSTITUENTS ARE SUBJECT TO
UNCERTAIN LEGAL AND REGULATORY REGIMES.

PS-14 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
o INVESTMENTS RELATED TO THE VALUES OF THE COMMODITIES TEND TO BE MORE VOLATILE THAN
TRADITIONAL INVESTMENTS.
o HIGHER FUTURE PRICES OF THE COMMODITY FUTURES CONTRACTS CONSTITUTING THE COMMODITY
CONSTITUENTS RELATIVE TO THEIR CURRENT PRICES MAY DECREASE THE AMOUNT PAYABLE AT MATURITY.
o THE MARKET PRICE OF CRUDE OIL AND GOLD WILL AFFECT THE VALUE OF THE NOTES.
Please refer to the “Risk Factors” section of the accompanying underlying supplement for more details regarding the above-listed and
other risks.

PS-15 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
Hypothetical Back-Tested Data and Historical Information
The following graph sets forth the hypothetical back-tested performance of the Index based on the hypothetical back-tested weekly
closing levels of the Index from January 8, 2021 through November 11, 2022, and the historical performance of the Index based on the
weekly historical closing levels of the Index from November 18, 2022 through August 7, 2026. The Index was established on November
18, 2022, as represented by the vertical line in the following graph. All data to the left of that vertical line reflect hypothetical back-
tested performance of the Index. All data to the right of that vertical line reflect actual historical performance of the Index. The closing
level of the Index on August 12, 2026 was 317.37. We obtained the closing levels above and below from the Bloomberg Professional®
service (“Bloomberg”), without independent verification.
The data for the hypothetical back-tested performance of the Index set forth in the following graph are purely theoretical and do not
represent the actual historical performance of the Index. See “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Index —
Hypothetical Back-Tested Data Relating to the Index Do Not Represent Actual Historical Data and Are Subject to Inherent Limitations”
above.
The hypothetical back-tested and historical closing levels of the Index should not be taken as an indication of future performance, and
no assurance can be given as to the closing level of the Index on any Review Date. There can be no assurance that the performance
of the Index will result in the return of any of your principal amount.
The hypothetical back-tested closing levels of the Index have inherent limitations and have not been verified by an independent third
party. These hypothetical back-tested closing levels are determined by means of a retroactive application of a back-tested model
designed with the benefit of hindsight. Hypothetical back-tested results are neither an indicator nor a guarantee of future returns. No
representation is made that an investment in the notes will or is likely to achieve returns similar to those shown. Alternative modeling
techniques or assumptions would produce different hypothetical back-tested closing levels of the Index that might prove to be more
appropriate and that might differ significantly from the hypothetical back-tested closing levels of the Index set forth above.
Tax Treatment
You should review carefully the section entitled “United States Federal Taxation” in the accompanying prospectus supplement. The
following discussion, when read in combination with that section, constitutes the full opinion of our special tax counsel, Davis Polk &
Wardwell LLP, regarding the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and disposing of notes.
Based on current market conditions, in the opinion of our special tax counsel it is reasonable to treat the notes as “open transactions”
that are not debt instruments for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as more fully described in “United States Federal Taxation — Tax
Consequences to U.S. Holders — Program Securities Treated as Prepaid Financial Contracts That are Open Transactions” in the
accompanying prospectus supplement. Assuming this treatment is respected, the gain or loss on your notes should be treated as long-
term capital gain or loss if you hold your notes for more than a year, whether or not you are an initial purchaser of notes at the issue
price. However, the IRS or a court may not respect this treatment, in which case the timing and character of any income or loss on the
notes could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, in 2007 Treasury and the IRS released a notice requesting comments on
the U.S. federal income tax treatment of “prepaid forward contracts” and similar instruments. The notice focuses in particular on
whether to require investors in these instruments to accrue income over the term of their investment. It also asks for comments on a

PS-16 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
number of related topics, including the character of income or loss with respect to these instruments; the relevance of factors such as
the nature of the underlying property to which the instruments are linked; the degree, if any, to which income (including any mandated
accruals) realized by non-U.S. investors should be subject to withholding tax; and whether these instruments are or should be subject
to the “constructive ownership” regime, which very generally can operate to recharacterize certain long-term capital gain as ordinary
income and impose a notional interest charge. While the notice requests comments on appropriate transition rules and effective dates,
any Treasury regulations or other guidance promulgated after consideration of these issues could materially and adversely affect the
tax consequences of an investment in the notes, possibly with retroactive effect. You should consult your tax adviser regarding the
U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the notes, including possible alternative treatments and the issues presented
by this notice.
Section 871(m) of the Code and Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder (“Section 871(m)”) generally impose a 30% withholding
tax (unless an income tax treaty applies) on dividend equivalents paid or deemed paid to Non-U.S. Holders with respect to certain
financial instruments linked to U.S. equities or indices that include U.S. equities. Section 871(m) provides certain exceptions to this
withholding regime, including for instruments linked to certain broad-based indices that meet requirements set forth in the applicable
Treasury regulations. Additionally, a recent IRS notice excludes from the scope of Section 871(m) instruments issued prior to January
1, 2027 that do not have a delta of one with respect to underlying securities that could pay U.S.-source dividends for U.S. federal
income tax purposes (each an “Underlying Security”). Based on certain determinations made by us, our special tax counsel is of the
opinion that Section 871(m) should not apply to the notes with regard to Non-U.S. Holders. Our determination is not binding on the
IRS, and the IRS may disagree with this determination. Section 871(m) is complex and its application may depend on your particular
circumstances, including whether you enter into other transactions with respect to an Underlying Security. You should consult your tax
adviser regarding the potential application of Section 871(m) to the notes.
The Estimated Value of the Notes
The estimated value of the notes set forth on the cover of this pricing supplement is equal to the sum of the values of the following
hypothetical components: (1) a fixed-income debt component with the same maturity as the notes, valued using the internal funding
rate described below, and (2) the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes. The estimated value of the
notes does not represent a minimum price at which JPMS would be willing to buy your notes in any secondary market (if any exists) at
any time. The internal funding rate used in the determination of the estimated value of the notes may differ from the market-implied
funding rate for vanilla fixed income instruments of a similar maturity issued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. Any difference
may be based on, among other things, our and our affiliates’ view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance,
operational and ongoing liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for the conventional fixed income
instruments of JPMorgan Chase & Co. This internal funding rate is based on certain market inputs and assumptions, which may prove
to be incorrect, and is intended to approximate the prevailing market replacement funding rate for the notes. The use of an internal
funding rate and any potential changes to that rate may have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and any secondary market
prices of the notes. For additional information, see “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and
Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — The Estimated Value of the Notes Is Derived by Reference to an Internal Funding Rate” in this
pricing supplement.
The value of the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes is derived from internal pricing models of our
affiliates. These models are dependent on inputs such as the traded market prices of comparable derivative instruments and on
various other inputs, some of which are market-observable, and which can include volatility, dividend rates, interest rates and other
factors, as well as assumptions about future market events and/or environments. Accordingly, the estimated value of the notes is
determined when the terms of the notes are set based on market conditions and other relevant factors and assumptions existing at that
time.
The estimated value of the notes does not represent future values of the notes and may differ from others’ estimates. Different pricing
models and assumptions could provide valuations for the notes that are greater than or less than the estimated value of the notes. In
addition, market conditions and other relevant factors in the future may change, and any assumptions may prove to be incorrect. On
future dates, the value of the notes could change significantly based on, among other things, changes in market conditions, our or
JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s creditworthiness, interest rate movements and other relevant factors, which may impact the price, if any, at
which JPMS would be willing to buy notes from you in secondary market transactions.
The estimated value of the notes is lower than the original issue price of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring
and hedging the notes are included in the original issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions paid to JPMS
and other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, the projected profits, if any, that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in
hedging our obligations under the notes, the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes and the fees, if any, paid for
third-party data analytics and/or electronic platform services. Because hedging our obligations entails risk and may be influenced by

PS-17 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
market forces beyond our control, this hedging may result in a profit that is more or less than expected, or it may result in a loss. A
portion of the profits, if any, realized in hedging our obligations under the notes may be allowed to other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers,
and we or one or more of our affiliates will retain any remaining hedging profits. See “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating
to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — The Estimated Value of the Notes Is Lower Than the Original
Issue Price (Price to Public) of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
Secondary Market Prices of the Notes
For information about factors that will impact any secondary market prices of the notes, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to the
Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — Secondary market prices of the notes will be impacted by many
economic and market factors” in the accompanying product supplement. In addition, we generally expect that some of the costs
included in the original issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in connection with any repurchases of your notes by
JPMS in an amount that will decline to zero over an initial predetermined period. These costs can include selling commissions,
projected hedging profits, if any, and, in some circumstances, estimated hedging costs, our internal secondary market funding rates for
structured debt issuances and the fees paid for third-party data analytics and/or electronic platform services. This initial predetermined
time period is intended to be the shorter of six months and one-half of the stated term of the notes. The length of any such initial period
reflects the structure of the notes, whether our affiliates expect to earn a profit in connection with our hedging activities, the estimated
costs of hedging the notes and when these costs are incurred, as determined by our affiliates. See “Selected Risk Considerations —
Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — The Value of the Notes as Published by JPMS
(and Which May Be Reflected on Customer Account Statements) May Be Higher Than the Then-Current Estimated Value of the Notes
for a Limited Time Period” in this pricing supplement.
Supplemental Use of Proceeds
The notes are offered to meet investor demand for products that reflect the risk-return profile and market exposure provided by the
notes. See “How the Notes Work” and “Hypothetical Payout Examples” in this pricing supplement for an illustration of the risk-return
profile of the notes and “The J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index” in this pricing supplement for a description of the market exposure
provided by the notes.
The original issue price of the notes is equal to the estimated value of the notes plus the selling commissions paid to JPMS and other
affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, plus (minus) the projected profits (losses) that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent
in hedging our obligations under the notes, plus the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes, plus the fees, if any, paid
for third-party data analytics and/or electronic platform services.
Validity of the Notes and the Guarantee
In the opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as special products counsel to JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co., when the
notes offered by this pricing supplement have been issued by JPMorgan Financial pursuant to the indenture, the trustee and/or paying
agent has made, in accordance with the instructions from JPMorgan Financial, the appropriate entries or notations in its records relating
to the master global note that represents such notes (the “master note”), and such notes have been delivered against payment as
contemplated herein, such notes will be valid and binding obligations of JPMorgan Financial and the related guarantee will constitute a
valid and binding obligation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., enforceable in accordance with their terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, concepts of reasonableness and equitable principles of general
applicability (including, without limitation, concepts of good faith, fair dealing and the lack of bad faith), provided that such counsel
expresses no opinion as to (x)(i) the effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer or similar provision of applicable law on the
conclusions expressed above or (ii) any provision of the indenture that purports to avoid the effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent
transfer or similar provision of applicable law by limiting the amount of JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s obligation under the related guarantee
or (y) the validity, legally binding effect or enforceability of any provision that permits holders to collect any portion of the stated principal
amount upon acceleration of the notes to the extent determined to constitute unearned interest. This opinion is given as of the date
hereof and is limited to the laws of the State of New York, the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and the Delaware
Limited Liability Company Act, except that such counsel expresses no opinion as to (i) any law, rule or regulation that is applicable to
JPMorgan Financial or JPMorgan Chase & Co., the indenture, the notes, the related guarantee (together with the indenture and the
notes, the “Documents”) or such transactions solely because such law, rule or regulation is part of a regulatory regime applicable to any
party to any of the Documents or any of its affiliates due to the specific assets or business of such party or such affiliate or (ii) any law,
rule or regulation relating to national security. In addition, this opinion is subject to customary assumptions about the trustee’s
authorization, execution and delivery of the indenture and its authentication of the master note and the validity, binding nature and
enforceability of the indenture with respect to the trustee, all as stated in the letter of such counsel dated February 24, 2026, which was

PS-18 | Structured Investments
Review Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Index
filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 by JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co. on February 24,
2026.
Additional Terms Specific to the Notes
You should read this pricing supplement together with the accompanying prospectus, as supplemented by the accompanying
prospectus supplement relating to our Series A medium-term notes of which these notes are a part, and the more detailed information
contained in the accompanying product supplement and the accompanying underlying supplement. This pricing supplement, together
with the documents listed below, contains the terms of the notes and supersedes all other prior or contemporaneous oral statements as
well as any other written materials including preliminary or indicative pricing terms, correspondence, trade ideas, structures for
implementation, sample structures, fact sheets, brochures or other educational materials of ours. You should carefully consider, among
other things, the matters set forth in the “Risk Factors” sections of the accompanying prospectus supplement, the accompanying
product supplement and the accompanying underlying supplement, as the notes involve risks not associated with conventional debt
securities. We urge you to consult your investment, legal, tax, accounting and other advisers before you invest in the notes.
You may access these documents on the SEC website at www.sec.gov as follows (or if such address has changed, by reviewing our
filings for the relevant date on the SEC website):
• Product supplement no. 3-I dated April 17, 2026:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000121390026045198/ea0285802-20_424b2.pdf
• Underlying supplement no. 23-I dated April 17, 2026:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000121390026045207/ea0285802-16_424b2.pdf
• Prospectus supplement and prospectus, each dated April 17, 2026:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000095010326005889/crt_dp245141-424b2.pdf
Our Central Index Key, or CIK, on the SEC website is 1665650, and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s CIK is 19617. As used in this pricing
supplement, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to JPMorgan Financial.