
Lexeo TherapeuticsCorporate Overview August 2026 Exhibit 99.2

Forward-looking statements This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including, but not limited to, Lexeo’s expectations and plans regarding its current product candidates and programs, the anticipated benefits of its current product candidates, the timing for receipt and announcement of data from its clinical trials, the timing and likelihood of potential regulatory developments, trial design changes and approval, and expectations regarding the time period over which Lexeo’s capital resources will be sufficient to fund its anticipated operations and estimates regarding Lexeo’s financial condition. Words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “objective,” “intend,” “should,” “could,” “can,” “would,” “expect,” “believe,” “design,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “develop,” “plan” or the negative of these terms, and similar expressions, or statements regarding intent, belief, or current expectations, are forward-looking statements. While Lexeo believes these forward looking statements are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on any such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon current information available to the company as well as certain estimates and assumptions and are subject to various risks and uncertainties (including, without limitation, those set forth in Lexeo’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)), many of which are beyond the company’s control and subject to change. Actual results could be materially different from those indicated by such forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including but not limited to: the outcome of ongoing discussions with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding the design of our pivotal trial for accelerated approval pathway and the design of our confirmatory study for obtaining full approval; expectations regarding the initiation, progress, and expected results of Lexeo’s preclinical studies, clinical trials and research and development programs; the unpredictable relationship between preclinical study results and clinical study results; topline data and final results from our pivotal trial; delays in submission of regulatory filings or failure to receive regulatory approval; risks and uncertainties related to global macroeconomic conditions and related volatility; liquidity and capital resources; and other risks and uncertainties identified in Lexeo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026, filed with the SEC on May 11, 2026, and subsequent future filings Lexeo may make with the SEC. New risks and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible to predict all risks and uncertainties. Lexeo claims the protection of the Safe Harbor contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for forward-looking statements. Lexeo expressly disclaims any obligation to update or alter any statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Dedicated to reshaping heart health by applying pioneering science to fundamentally change how cardiovascular disease is treated Genetic medicine leader with rare cardiac disease focus Proven experience in the clinic Platform designed for safety and scalability Individuals and families impacted by Friedreich ataxia

Building a leading cardiac gene therapy platform Differentiated AAVrh.10 capsid Proven cardiac tropism allows for lower doses and improved therapeutic index Innovative AAV manufacturing Optimized Sf9 baculovirus manufacturing platform designed to support future commercial scale-up Operating experience Deep cardiac genetic medicine know-how, anchored by two clinical and two preclinical programs Strong financial position Cash runway into 2028, supporting multiple value creating milestones Genetic cardiac disease expertise Leader in genetic medicine for inherited cardiac diseases

Advancing cardiac genetic medicines in diseases with high unmet need Lexeo cardiac programs and expertise: Clinical: LX2006 Friedreich Ataxia Cardiomyopathy LX2020 PKP2 Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Proven clinical experience with 27 patients treated using AAVrh.10 Cardiomyopathies have few disease-modifying therapies and high morbidity/mortality High unmet need Cardiac gene therapy is less competitive, offering opportunity to establish leadership White space Lexeo’s vision is to fundamentally change the course of inherited cardiac disease with a single infusion Transformative potential Market opportunity: LX2021 Desmoplakin Cardiomyopathy LX2022 Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Deep expertise in genetic cardiac disease models and IND enabling studies Pre-Clinical:

Lexeo’s AAVrh.10 is a highly differentiated capsid Lexeo’s AAVrh.10 is a highly differentiated capsid AAVrh.10 has been utilized systemically across LX2006 and LX2020 with no clinically significant complement activation. Both LX2006 and LX2020 have been generally well-tolerated to date Significant evidence of protein expression in LX2006 clinical data with AAVrh.10 capsid An increase in FXN protein was observed in human cardiac biopsies at the high dose of 1.2 × 10¹² vg/kg in the phase I/II study This remains a relatively low dose in cardiac gene therapy and showed an important increase from baseline Increased Frataxin Expression Across All Participants Evaluated at 3-Months Post Treatment – Measured by LCMS (Previously Reported) % increase FXN from baseline 200% 300% 100% 0% Cohort Avg. Inc. (%) Part. 6 Part. 9 29% 187% 22% 35% 151% 120% 198% 23% +0.22 +1.81 ng/mg total prot.: C3 (n=4) 115% C1 (n=1) Cohort 2 (n=3) Cohort 3 (n=4) C1 (n=1) 29% C2 (n=3) 69% Part. 10 +0.40 Part. 11 +0.29 Part. 12 +0.11 Part. 14 +0.91 Part. 15 +0.53 Part. 16 +0.60 Compelling cardiac tropism in pre-clinical data Observed ~1.5x to 2.0x greater biodistribution in the heart compared to AAV9 in multiple large animal models Observed greater trends of functional improvements in PKP2-murine model compared to AAV9 NHP Biodistribution2 Yucatan Minipig Biodistribution1 Copies/μg DNA 15000 10000 5000 0 AAV9 AAVrh.10 I-124 Vector Levels (% total body) 16% 12% 8% 4% 0% AAV9 AAVrh.10 1 - Selvan, N. et al. Poster presented at: ASGCT Annual Meeting; May 16-20, 2023; Los Angeles, CA. 2 - Ballon DJ et al, Human Gene Therapy, 2020. Note: FXN, Frataxin; LCMS, Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. FXN expression assessed with academic LCMS assay, assay validation in progress for pivotal study. LX2006 FXN data previously reported in April 2025. Distribution to the heart ~2x higher with AAVrh.10 than AAV9 Distribution to the heart ~1.5x higher with AAVrh.10 than AAV9 Cardiac tropism of AAVrh.10 may allow lower doses for cardiac gene therapy

Lexeo's optimized Sf9 baculovirus platform combines differentiated manufacturing, attractive economics and demonstrated commercial readiness High yield, strong product quality, and an FDA-endorsed commercial manufacturing process position Lexeo for attractive economics and execution readiness across our pipeline Differentiated Manufacturing Optimized Sf9 baculovirus platform Improved genomic purity High-quality vector production Higher yield and quality compared to HEK model Fewer empty AAV capsids <25% Higheryields 1.0E15 vg/L Greater downstream recovery>55% Potentially Transformational COGS Profile Lower Cost Per Dose Fewer Production Runs Fewer Empty Capsids Higher Recovery Higher Yield + Well Defined Starting Materials LX2006 selected for FDA CDRP program FDA confirmed no additional nonclinical bridging studies required Final commercial manufacturing process cleared for SUNRISE-FA 2 Commercial-scale drug product available immediately for patient dosing Launch Readiness

Lexeo’s two clinical stage programs address devastating cardiac diseases Leveraging gene therapy to address devastating cardiac diseases with no existing disease-modifying treatments Focus: LX2006 Potential first disease-modifying gene therapy for FA cardiomyopathy Only program with clinical-stage data in FA cardiomyopathy, which accounts for death in up to 80% of people with FA Clinical data to date demonstrate an encouraging safety profile and sustained and deepening improvements across both cardiac and neurologic measures of FA Finalized SUNRISE-FA 2 pivotal protocol & SAP for accelerated approval; Study initiated in June 2026; Expecting topline data in 2H 2027 and BLA filing in 1H 2028 Friedreich Ataxia Cardiomyopathy FA - Friedreich Ataxia; FXN - Frataxin; LVMi - Left Ventricular Mass Index; ACM - arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; SAP – Statistical analysis plan. LX2020 Potential best-in-class treatment for PKP2- ACM; ~60K people in US with no disease- modifying treatment available Interim clinical data show encouraging early signals on efficacy and safety measures across patients dosed in the low and high dose cohorts Data update for high-dose participants expected in Q4 2026; regulatory engagement expected in 2026 PKP2 Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy

Our pipeline 1 - Friedreich ataxia.2 - Plakophilin 2 Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.3 - Desmoplakin. Programs: Indication: Gene: Phase I/II Phase II/III CARDIOVASCULAR FXN PKP2 GJA1 (encoding for CX43 protein) TNNI3 Lexeo retains global rights across all programs LX2006 LX2020 LX2021 LX2022 Preclinical FA(1) Cardiomyopathy DSP(3) Cardiomyopathy PKP2-ACM(2) Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Clinical: Pre-clinical: ~35K US prevalence ~25K US prevalence ~5K US prevalence Discovery ~60K US prevalence

Friedreich Ataxia Cardiomyopathy (FA-CM) LX2006

Cardiac complications are the leading cause of death in Friedreich Ataxia 1 - Payne R.M. JACC Basic Transl Sci, 2022;13;7(12):1267-1283. - Friedreich’s Ataxia Research Alliance, 2024. - Norrish G., et al. Arch Dis Child, 2022;107(5), 450–455. - Reetz, K., et al. Lancet Neurol, 2025;24(7):614-624. FA - Friedreich Ataxia; FXN - Frataxin; LVMi - Left Ventricular Mass Index. 5 - Indelicato, E., et al. Mov Disord, 2024;39(3), 510–518. 6 - Lexeo Therapeutics, Data on File, 2025. FA is a rare, progressive and devastating multisystem disease caused by a loss of function mutation in the FXN gene1. With a typical age of onset between 5 and 15 years2, individuals with FA experience a combination of cardiac and neurological manifestations, with cardiac complications accounting for up to 80% of deaths1 Cardiac dysfunction in FA is associated with a multitude of symptoms but ultimately presents as cardiac hypertrophy and subsequent heart failure1; hypertrophy in childhood is potentially associated with a more severe phenotype, with earlier progression to end-stage disease3 The only approved disease-specific treatment for FA demonstrated efficacy on neurological measures but was not evaluated for the treatment of cardiac dysfunction in clinical trials, leaving significant unmet need within FA cardiomyopathy4 ~5,000 individuals affected by FA in the U.S.2 ~15,000 individuals affected by FA worldwide2 Up to 40% of adults with FA have left ventricular hypertrophy as defined by abnormal LVMi6 Cardiac complications account for up to 80% of deaths in those with FA, with an average life expectancy of 35–40 years1,5

Cardiac symptoms may be absent or under-recognized even as cardiomyopathy evolves, supporting the need for earlier evaluation and coordinated neurology-cardiology care Typical age of onset between 5-15 Most early signs are movement-related Small subset of children (~5%) present with cardiac symptoms years before ataxia1 Early symptom onset Patients may remain in pediatric care during early development Diagnosis is often delayed while symptoms evolve Pediatric evaluation Neurology referral & FA diagnosis Referral to pediatric neurologist, followed by ataxia specialists; neurologist manages workup Genetic testing confirms FXN mutation Guidelines recommend cardiology referral at FA diagnosis EKG, echo and blood biomarkers establish cardiovascular baseline Cardiology workup Long-term FA-CM management Monitoring frequency varies by CM symptoms & severity Ongoing care requires neurology-cardiology coordination No existing evidence that heart-failure medications prevent cardiac dysfunction or provides cardiac benefit to those with preserved EF2 Primary HCP: Pediatrician Primary HCP: Neurologist + ataxia COE Primary HCP: Neurologist + cardiologist + ataxia COE Timely, multidisciplinary care is critical to identifying and managing FA-CM Cardiac complications drive up to 80% of FA deaths, often by the mid-30s, reinforcing the need for early cardiac evaluation, coordinated follow-up and disease-modifying treatments3,4 Source: HCP and patient market research. COE = center of excellence. 1 - Norrish G., et al. Friedreich’s ataxia-associated childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a national cohort study. 2 - Clinical Management Guidelines for Friedreich Ataxia. Chapter 4. The heart and cardiovascular system in Friedreich ataxia. 2022. 3 - Tsou AY, Paulsen EK, Lagedrost SJ, et al. Mortality in Friedreich ataxia. J Neurol Sci. 2011;307(1-2):46-49. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2011.05.023. PMID:21652007. 4 - Pousset F, Legrand L, Monin ML, et al. A 22-Year Follow-up Study of Long-term Cardiac Outcome and Predictors of Survival in Friedreich Ataxia. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(11):1334-1341. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1855. PMID:26414159

LX2006 has the potential to treat the root cause of FA cardiomyopathy: significant decrease in frataxin in the heart AAV, Adeno-Associated Virus; CAG, Chicken Beta-Actin; cDNA, Copy DNA; FA, Friedreich Ataxia; FXN, Frataxin; Poly-A, Poly Adenosine. AAVrh.10hFXN LX2006 construct: Ubiquitous promoter FXN cDNA(full length gene) Rabbitβ-globin polyA CAG FXN gene Poly-A FXN mutation FXN deficiency Mitochondria Increased FXN expression FA Cardiomyopathy LX2006 Mechanism Cardiomyocyte Delivery of FXN gene in cardiomyocytes by LX2006 is intended to increase frataxin protein levels in the mitochondria and improve heart muscle function FXN deficiency results in mitochondrial dysfunction and leads to deficient energy production in thickened cardiomyocytes Mitochondria Cardiomyocyte Iron cluster FXN with iron Functional FXN gene

Elevated LVMi predicts mortality in FA and is not expected to decrease significantly without intervention HR - Hazard Ratio; CI - Confidence Internal; LVMi - Left Ventricular Mass Index. Note: 10g/m2 represents approximately 10% change in LVMi based on echocardiography measurements of upper bound of normal (105 g/m2). 1 - Pousset, F. et al. JAMA Neurol, 2015;72(11):1334-1341. 2 - Includes heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, Shah et al, Journal of American College of Cardiology, 2019; hypertensive cardiomyopathy, Muiesan et al, Hypertension, 2004; Fabry disease, Orsborne et al, Journal of American College of Cardiology, 2022; and obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Hegde et al, Journal of American College of Cardiology, 2021. 3 - Hughes DA, et al. J Med Genet, 2017;54:288–296; Migalastat; Solomon S, et al. Circulation, 2018. Patisiran; Saberi S, et al. Circulation, 2021;143:606–608. Mavacamten; Data on file. Increases in LVMi independently predict mortality in Friedreich Ataxia (FA) Natural history study showed a 19% higher risk of death per 10g/m2 (HR 1.19; 95% CI)1 MRI of individual with FA cardiomyopathy demonstrating significant hypertrophy. Concentric hypertrophy, with increased left ventricular mass and wall thickness, is a hallmark of FA cardiomyopathy1 In FA and many other cardiac diseases, elevated LVMi is not expected to significantly decrease without intervention1,3 – and abnormal LVMi is closely correlated with poor outcomes2 Reduction in LVMi may improve cardiac outcomes; key primary endpoint for pivotal trial in FA cardiomyopathy Disease Measure(3) LVMi or LVM Percent Change from Baseline in Placebo or Control Arm Fabry Disease LVMi at 18 months on ERT Amyloidosis (ATTR) LVM at 18 Months HCM LVMi at 30 Weeks -2 g/m2 (-2.2%) +0.6g (0.3%) -1.6 g/m2 (-1.7%) Note: Percent change in LVM / LVMi calculated based on change applied to baseline levels. No Significant Change in LVMi or LV Mass (LVM) Control Across Multiple Randomized Controlled Trials

LX2006 clinical data show sustained or deepening improvements across cardiac measures of FA; LX2006 generally well tolerated LX2006 generally well tolerated across 17 participants dosed with no Grade 3 treatment-related SAEs to date No clinically significant complement activation Minimal, transient LFT elevations No signs of frataxin over-expression observed in cardiac tissue One previously disclosed, possibly treatment-related Grade 2 event of asymptomatic myocarditis observed one year after dosing Mean LVMi Change Participants at 12-mo visit (n=6) -23% Participants at 6-mo visit1 (n=6) -18% Cohorts 2 and 3 at 12-mo visit (n=3) -33% Cohorts 2 and 3 at 6-mo visit1 (n=3) -28% Cardiac MRI: LVMi (n=6; abnormal at baseline) Biomarkers: High-Sensitivity Troponin I (n=17) Majority of participants reach or remain in normal LVMi range at latest visit Durable LVMi improvement maintained out to three years following treatment LX2006 generally well tolerated Cardiac MRI: LVMi Among participants with abnormal baseline LVMi (key inclusion criteria for pivotal study; n=6): LVMi (g/m2) Change from baseline (%) Cohort 1 (n=3) Cohort 2 (n=2) Cohort 3 (n=1) 16 of 17 participants have significantly reduced or stable troponin I, excluding participant with myocarditis2 Highly specific, blood-based marker of myocardial injury Cohort 1 (n=6) Cohort 2 (n=6) Cohort 3 (n=4) Improvement Improvement (1) Participant 11 6-month visit not conducted due to hurricane; 3-month visit used for mean calculations. (2) Participant 10 not included in Hs-TNI chart due to scale. Values are +29% at 6M, +45% at 9M, +2,702% at 12M, +1,857% at 18M, +1,620% at 21M, and +1,458% at 24M as of most recent safety monitoring.Note: Data as of December 2025.

Cardiac function improvement observed in individual with later stage cardiomyopathy Effect of LX2006 on Cardiac Function Majority of Participants (16/17) Baseline LVEF: Normal Post therapy: No change One Participant (#13) with later stage cardiomyopathy Baseline LVEF: Low (35%) Post Therapy: Significant improvements across all cardiac biomarkers Cardiac Improvements 18 months Post LX2006 Treatmentin Participant with Low Baseline LVEF Biomarker: High-Sensitivity Troponin I83% reduction Cardiac MRI: LVMi48% reduction Cardiac MRI: LVEF LVMi (g/m2) LVEF (%) hs troponin I (ng/L) LVMi = left ventricular mass index, LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction. Note: Data as of December 2025.

Mean Change from Baseline (95% CI) Change in mFARS: Open Label Cohort (n=16) vs. UNIFAI Matched Control (n=45) mFARS validated clinical scale measures FA neurological progression; higher scores represent disease worsening Majority of LX2006-treated participants demonstrate mFARS improvement or stabilization at latest visit relative to baseline New evidence of neurological functional improvement compared to propensity matched control, with annualized difference in progression of 2.3 points per year (95% CI: 0.82-3.84) PSM, propensity score matched. Note: Data as of December 2025. 16 patients treated with LX2006 in the Open Label study were matched to a control group of individuals in the Friedrich Ataxia Global Clinical Consortium UNIFIED Natural History Study of Friedrich’s Ataxia (UNIFAI) in a 3:1 ratio. While some patients did not have 2 years of follow up, this model is using every patient’s earlier visits to inform the rate-of-change estimate for mFARS (an annualized slope). Analysis performed by Christian Rumney in partnership with FARA. Statistically significant improvement in mean mFARS scores for LX2006-treated participants compared to propensity-matched control cohort Baseline 12 mo. 24 mo. Statistically significant slope difference (p=0.003)

Finalized SUNRISE-FA 2 pivotal protocol and SAP for LX2006 Study design: Open-label pivotal study with untreated control arm (no placebo or sham) Dose: 1.2x1012 vg/kg, one-time IV infusion Sample Size: 26 participants, 13 participants treated with LX2006 Key Eligibility Criteria: 16 years and older: Abnormal baseline LVMi, ≥2SD above normal mean 6 to <16 years: Abnormal baseline LV wall thickness, assessed via echocardiography. Pediatric cohorts assessed primarily for safety Primary Endpoint: LVMi, via cMRI at 6 months Statistical Analysis Plan: Pivotal arms stratified to balance baseline LVMi Study powered for 15% or greater LVMi change at 6 months Key Secondary Endpoints: mFARS, KCCQ, Hs-Troponin I, lateral wall thickness Confirmatory Evidence Strategy: Lexeo remains in ongoing discussions with the FDA regarding potential use of certain secondary endpoints at the 12-month time point in SUNRISE-FA 2 to support full approval Vg/kg = vector genomes per kilogram, LVMi = left ventricular mass index, cMRI = cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, mFARS = modified Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale, KCCQ = Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, Hs = high sensitivity. Expect topline data in the second half of 2027 and a potential BLA filing in the first half of 2028

SUNRISE-FA 2 Is Supported by Clinical Evidence, Robust Study Designand Execution Readiness Phase I/II data exceeded pivotal-study assumptions, statistical simulations signal potential to meet the primary endpoint, and operational execution is already underway, providing multiple sources of confidence in SUNRISE-FA 2 Observed Phase I/II efficacy exceeds assumptions incorporated into the pivotal study design ~18% LVMi reduction observed at 6 months, with ~28% reduction in higher dose cohorts (2 & 3) in patients with abnormal baseline LVMI1 Effect exceeds both the 10% clinically meaningful benchmark and the 15% powering threshold for SUNRISE-FA 2 LVMi has not been shown to improve without intervention Phase I/II LVMi Reductions Exceeded the Threshold Used to Power SUNRISE-FA 2 >99% of simulated trials met or exceeded the 15% powering threshold, with most outcomes exceeding by a wide margin Stratification ensures balanced distribution of disease severity and aligns study population Monte Carlo simulations support study assumptions Study Design Maximizes Ability to Detect a Clinically Meaningful Treatment Effect Operational infrastructure is in place to support key milestones through topline data and potential registration First SUNRISE-FA 2 participant enrolled in June 2026 CLARITY-FA enrollment continues to advance and supports identification of eligible participants into pivotal study; 19 active sites across 8 countries Topline data expected in 2H 2027; potential BLA submission in 1H 2028 Execution Readiness With Clear Catalyst Path (1) Participant 11 6-month visit not conducted due to hurricane; 3-month visit used for 6 month mean calculation.

Patient Impact LX2006 Has Potential to Improve Outcomes Across the Disease Continuum in FA No Cardiomyopathy Mild Cardiomyopathy Moderate Cardiomyopathy Severe Cardiomyopathy Cardiac Disease4 Increasing cardiac dysfunction Increasing mortality risk Loss of ambulation, shortness of breath, arrythmias Neurological burden progresses throughout the disease course Neurological Disease Unmet Need ~5,000 individuals affected by FA in the U.S / ~15,000 impacted worldwide3 Subset of FA patients with cardiomyopathy have abnormal LVMi (up to 40%)1,2 LX2006 Differentiation Based on cardiac and CNS data generated to date, LX2006 has the potential to address the full spectrum of FA, while the current standard of care addresses only the neurological manifestations of disease 1 - Pousset, F. et al. JAMA Neurol, 2015;72(11):1334-1341. The heart and cardiovascular system in Friedreich ataxia. 2022. 2 - Lexeo Therapeutics, Data on File, 2025. 3 - Friedreich’s Ataxia Research Alliance, 2024. 4 - Weidemann, F., Rummey, C., Bijnens, B., Störk, S., Jasaityte, R., Dhooge, J., Baltabaeva, A., Sutherland, G., Schulz, J. B., Meier, T., & Mitochondrial Protection with Idebenone in Cardiac or Neurological Outcome (MICONOS) study group (2012). The heart in Friedreich ataxia: definition of cardiomyopathy, disease severity, and correlation with neurological symptoms. Circulation, 125(13), 1626–1634. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.059477 20

Addressable FA patients are concentrated within a small network of specialty centers, creating a clear and efficient path to patient identification, referral, and treatment for LX2006 if approved Majority of FA patients are managed at a limited number of specialized treatment centers. Most target patients are genetically confirmed and actively followed at academic institutions. Established partnerships with leading FA patient advocacy organizations facilitate patient identification and community outreach. Existing relationships with multidisciplinary FA care teams, including cardiologists managing FA-CM, support efficient patient identification, evaluation, and treatment activation. Patient Identification FA Patients Are Highly Concentrated and Readily Identifiable FA Patient Populations Sources: Data on file. Katharina Buesch & Rongrong Zhang (2022) A systematic review of disease prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic outcomes associated with Friedreich’s Ataxia, Current Medical Research and Opinion, 38:10, 1739-1749, DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2112870

Strong path forward for LX2006 SUNRISE-FA 2 Initiated with First Patient Enrolled in June 2026 Differentiated AAVrh.10 Capsid and Commercial-Ready CMC Supply Chain Phase I/II Results Exceed the Effect Size in LVMi Used to Power the Pivotal Study Building Internal Commercial Capabilities to Support Successful Launch Next steps Continued FDA engagement on confirmatory evidence strategy; update expected once finalized Topline data readout expected in second half of 2027 Potential BLA submission under accelerated approval pathwayin first half of 2028

Plakophilin 2 Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy(PKP2-ACM) LX2020

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy caused by mutations in the PKP2 gene: devastating genetic heart disease with clearly defined mechanism PKP2-ACM is a rare, genetic cardiac disease caused by loss of function mutations in the PKP2 gene Approximately 23% of individuals with ACM experience SCD as the presenting symptom and individuals often suffer from anxiety and reduced quality of life(3)(4) ICDs are commonly utilized in the US but do not halt disease progression. Individuals experience ongoing arrhythmias, along with both appropriate and inappropriate shocks necessitating escalating treatments, underscoring severe unmet need(2)(3) Prevalence: ~60,000 US Standard of care: Current management methods are focused on relieving symptoms and preventing SCD, and do not address the underlying cause of ACM ACM, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; ARVD/C, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy; ICD implantable cardioverter defibrillator; SDC sudden cardiac death. (1) Cedars-Sinai ARVC overview. (2023). (2) Corrado et al. (2017). (3) Dalal et al. (2005). (4) Day, Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics (2012). Progressive replacement of cardiac muscle with fatty fibrotic tissue, with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to disrupted cardiac electrical signals(1)(2)

Mutations in the PKP2 gene are the most common genetic cause of ACM; LX2020 delivers a full-length PKP2 gene to cardiomyocytes, restoring the desmosome ACM, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. PKP2 cDNA (full length gene) Rabbit β-globin polyA AAVrh.10hPKP2 LX2020 construct: Cardiac-specific promoter Promoter PKP2 gene Poly-A PKP2-ACM: Absence of PKP2 results in impairment of cardiac desmosomes, leading to abnormal cardiac rhythms (arrhythmias) and onset of cardiac dysfunction DES DES Desmosomal complex Absent PKP2 Desmoglein-2 Desmocollin-2 Desmin Desmoplakin Plakoglobin LX2020 mechanism: PKP2 expression is expected to restore the balance of desmosomal proteins by scaffolding adjacent cell-cell junctional proteins The restoration of PKP2 may lead to improvement in cardiac electrical and mechanical function as well as inhibit further structural damage Desmosomal complex AAVrh.10 Desmin Desmoplakin DES DES Plakoglobin PKP2 Desmoglein-2 Desmocollin-2

Individuals with ACM experience high arrhythmia burden with a spectrum of severity Early indicator of electrical instability that can trigger more severe/sustained arrhythmia >3 ventricular beats in a row, at >100 bpm, lasting under 30 seconds2; self-terminating Closely associated with increased riskof sustained VT, ICD shock and SCD1; impacts patient anxiety and qualityof life >3 ventricular beats in a row, at >100 bpm, lasting more than 30 seconds2 Can cause collapse, cardiac arrest or SCD; sustained VT may be terminated by ICD shock to restore normal rhythm SCD, sudden cardiac death; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; VT, ventricular tachycardia. Gasperetti A, et al. JAMA Cardiology, 2022; Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2018;138(13):e272-e391. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000549. Severity of Arrhythmias Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVCs) Non-Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia (NSVT) Sustained VT / ICD Shock Normal Sinus Rhythm Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC) Compensatory Pause Ventricular Tachycardia CardioversionShock Sinus Rhythm

Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) may trigger ventricular tachycardia (VT); measures are related but driven by potentially different mechanisms (1) Cerrone et al. Nature Comm, 2017. (2) Kim et al. Circulation, 2019. (3) Sato P. et al. Circulation Research, 2009. (4) Oxford E.M et al. Circulation Research, 2007. PVCs Are a Trigger That Can Precipitate More Severe Arrhythmias VT is Caused When a Trigger (PVC) Meets an Electrical or Structural Vulnerability PKP2 deficient myocytes demonstrate calcium instability; Ca2+ leak can disrupt refractory period and depolarization1,2 PVCs are not reentry loops but can trigger them Calcium instability due to PKP2 deficiency likely driven by downstream proteins, which may take more time to repair versus the desmosome with direct PKP2 function VT occurs when a PVC meets a vulnerability like slow electrical conduction, enabling the premature beat to propagate as a reentry loop3,4 Reentry loops are self-sustaining electrical circuits that override normal rhythm, consistently re-exciting the heart PKP2 deficiency causes electrical and structural vulnerabilities like slow conduction and scarring; hypothesis that VT could be reduced if vulnerabilities are improved even if PVCs persist Ventricular Depolarization Ca2+ Ca2+ Ca2+ PKP2 Deficiency Reduces Cell-to-Cell Adhesion, Slowing Electrical Conduction and Causing Reentry Loops: Absent PKP2 Desmoglein-2 Desmocollin-2 Desmin Desmoplakin Plakoglobin Desmosomal Complex

In people with ACM, sustained VT risk is predicted by increased PVC burden and by non-sustained VT events PVC burden in ACM decreases initially after diagnosis but persists long term1 Initial drop driven by lifestyle change (exercise modification) and medication PVCs remain elevated (>500/24h) and variable over disease course While lifestyle modification may reduce PVCs immediately following diagnosis, Lexeo-sponsored SNAPSHOT natural history data suggests that PVCs and NSVT may increase later in disease progression, both of which are associated with greater VT risk 1. Gasperetti A, et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7(4):378–385 VT risk increases with PVCs and NSVT1 Prospective natural history SNAPSHOT (n=15) Participants mean 8 years after diagnosis Median PVC / 24h Median NSVT / 7d Quartile 1 +41% Quartile 3 +20% Quartile 1 Quartile 3

Phase I/II Trial Lexeo’s role in advancing PKP2-ACM research Retrospective EMR Review and Prospective Observational Natural History Study Objective: Assess the safety and efficacy of LX2020 in individuals with PKP2-ACM Dose: 2.0E13 vg/kg (Cohort 1), 6.0E13 vg/kg (Cohorts 2, 3) Key Endpoints: PKP2 expression, VT, PVC, QRS, T-wave inversion, cardiac function, PROs Status: Ongoing (fully enrolled, n=10) Objective: Evaluate the clinical burden of illness for patients with PKP2-ACM, and prospectively evaluate changes in key cardiac parameters and patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) associated with PKP2-ACM progression Dose: N/A Key Assessments: VT, PVC, QRS, T-wave inversion, cardiac function, PROs Status: Ongoing (actively recruiting)

LX2020 is being evaluated in an ongoing phase I/II study (HEROIC-PKP2); enrollment completed in Q4 2025 2 Key Inclusion Criteria 3 Key Measurements 1 Study Design & Objective Design: 52-week open-label study with a 4-year long term follow up Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of LX2020 in individuals with PKP2-ACM Adults (18-65 years) Diagnosis of ACM with documented PKP2 mutation Existing ICD that is MRI compatible and minimum threshold of PVCs / 24-hr Neutralizing anti-AAVrh.10 titer cutoff Ventricular arrhythmias and associated measures (PVC, VT, QRS, T-wave inversion) Cardiac Structure & Function (EF, EDV, ESV) Change in Symptoms (NYHA Class and PROs) PKP2 Protein Expression (quantitative WB) PVC, Premature Ventricular Contraction; hsTnI, High Sensitivity Troponin I; WB, Western Blot; ECG, Electrocardiogram; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PROs, Patient Reported Outcomes. Note: LX2020 is administered systemically; participants receive immune suppression with prednisone and sirolimus beginning on the day prior to treatment through 12 weeks following LX2020 administration. 2.0x1013 vg/kg 6.0x1013 vg/kg 6.0x1013 vg/kg Cohort 1 n=3 Cohort 2 n=3 Cohort 3 n=4 52-Week Fully Enrolled Fully Enrolled Fully Enrolled

Interim results demonstrate increased PKP2 expression and potential for LX2020 to reduce severe arrhythmia burden n=3 n=8 n=5 n=5 n=2 n=3 n=3 n=8 n=5 n=5 n=2 n=3 Mean change in PKP2 expression from baseline (western blot) Mean PVC change PVCs reduced or stabilized in majority of participants with >6 months of follow up -14% improvement in mean PVCs at latest visit in high-dose cohort Mean NSVT change NSVT reduced or stabilized in majority of participants with >6 months of follow up -22% improvement in mean NSVT at latest visit in high-dose cohort LX2020 generally well tolerated LX2020 generally well tolerated across ten participants dosed No clinically significant complement activation Elevations in liver function tests (LFT) observed in seven participants at the high-dose, treated successfully per trial protocol with no complications or hospitalization(2) No participants discontinued from study One previously disclosed Grade 3 serious adverse event of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) was observed three months after dosing. This event is consistent with the natural course of PKP2-ACM and its known clinical manifestations. The participant was successfully treated with anti-arrhythmic medication and discharged with no additional intervention required. Note: Data as of January 2026. Lab vendor identified an error with respect to Patient 2 in PKP2 expression data, impacting the low dose mean. Previously reported data for Patient 2 was 115% and correct value is 109%. (1) Participant 3 elected not to undergo a post-treatment biopsy (2) Five participants’ elevations occurred following steroid tapering and resolved with re-introduction of low-dose prednisone; two participants’ elevations occurred prior to steroid tapering and resolved with increased prednisone and sirolimus treatment; all elevations have since resolved without other complications or hospitalization, and no other medications were required for resolution Patient reported outcomes 4 of 5 participants at high dose report improvement relative to baseline on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale NSVT / 7d ng/μg Protein GAPDH Normalized PVC / 24h

Preclinical Programs

Lexeo is also advancing two preclinical cardiac gene therapy programs +2026 research collaboration with Johnson & Johnson exploring novel routes of administration for cardiac AAV gene therapy to maximize safety and efficacy LX2021 Significant unmet need characterized by extensive fibrosis, high arrhythmic risk, and substantial heart failure burden 30-50% mortality within 5 years of diagnosis for dilated phenotype ~35K patients in U.S. IND-enabling studies ongoing LX2021 Desmoplakin Cardiomyopathy TNNI3 variants compose 3-5% of all HCM cases, causing cardiomyopathy, clinical heart failure and shortened lifespan Non-obstructive phenotype, often with preserved EF; myosin inhibitors not effective ~25K patients in U.S. LX2022 Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Clear clinical and regulatory milestones supported by a strong balance sheet LX2006 Continued FDA engagement on confirmatory evidence strategy; update expected once finalized Topline data readout expected in second half of 2027 Potential BLA submission under accelerated approval pathway in first half of 2028 Friedreich Ataxia Cardiomyopathy LX2020 12-month data update for all high dose participants expected in fourth quarter of 2026 Regulatory engagement with the FDAexpected in 2026 PKP2 Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Cash, cash equivalents and investments of $234.2 million as of June 30, 2026 Strong financial position to take us through key milestones Cash runway into 2028 which provides funding through LX2006 pivotal study and BLA submission

Thank You