[Form 4] MIRA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Insider Trading Activity
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
MIRA Pharmaceuticals' CEO and director received repriced, fully vested stock options totaling 300,000 shares. The company’s board lowered the exercise price on two existing option grants—from $5.00 and $6.50—to $1.38, while leaving all other terms unchanged. Each repriced grant covers 150,000 options and remains exercisable into common stock with specified expiration dates in 2033. The disclosure shows the holdings are held directly by the reporting person and that the repricing was approved by the board, which materially changes the economic value of the previously issued awards.
Positive
- 300,000 options granted/repriced to $1.38 increases management alignment with potential upside
- Options are fully vested, providing clear, immediate economic recognition to the reporting person
- Board approval documented for the repricing action
Negative
- Exercise prices reduced significantly from $5.00 and $6.50 to $1.38, which materially enhances insider value
- Potential shareholder dilution upon exercise of 300,000 options
- Governance concerns may arise because repricing vested awards increases insider compensation without disclosed shareholder approval
Insights
TL;DR: Board-approved repricing materially increases intrinsic value of executive options but does not change share count or expiration terms.
The board reduced exercise prices from $5.00 and $6.50 to $1.38 on two option grants totaling 300,000 options now fully vested and held directly by the CEO/director. This raises the immediate economic value of those awards and strengthens executive upside if the stock appreciates above the new strike. It does not, per the filing, alter expiration dates or other contractual terms beyond price. For investors, the action improves management compensation economics but introduces potential dilution upon exercise.
TL;DR: Repricing vested options to a much lower strike can create shareholder governance concerns despite retaining original terms.
Repricing vested awards from $5.00 and $6.50 down to $1.38 significantly increases award value to the reporting person without new grant approvals disclosed. While the filing states all other terms are unchanged, such repricing can attract scrutiny over alignment with shareholder interests and customary anti-dilution or clawback protections. The move is material to governance assessments and may prompt questions about board rationale and shareholder approval practices.