CBIZ CPAs Engaged by Marker Therapeutics; Marcum Resigned
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Marker Therapeutics disclosed a change in its independent registered public accounting firm: Marcum LLP resigned and CBIZ CPAs P.C. was engaged to serve as the companys auditor for the year ending December 31, 2025, effective with the review of the condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. The engagement was approved by the Board of Directors and CBIZ will perform services previously provided by Marcum.
Marcums audit reports for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer and were not qualified, except that they included an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about the companys ability to continue as a going concern. The filing states there were no disagreements and no reportable events between the company and Marcum during the periods covered. A letter from Marcum is filed as Exhibit 16.1.
Positive
- Board-approved engagement of CBIZ CPAs to ensure continuity of audit and review services for 2025
- No disagreements or reportable events were reported between Marker Therapeutics and Marcum for the periods described
Negative
- Marcums audit reports included an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about the companys ability to continue as a going concern
- Change of independent auditor is a material event that may prompt investor scrutiny until CBIZ completes its reviews
Insights
TL;DR: Auditor transition to CBIZ follows Marcums attest business acquisition; Marcums prior audits included a going-concern explanatory paragraph, a material disclosure.
The auditor change stems from CBIZ CPAs acquiring Marcums attest business and Marcums subsequent resignation. CBIZ is engaged to complete reviews beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2025, which preserves auditor continuity for interim reporting. The filing explicitly states there were no disagreements or reportable events, reducing immediate audit-risk concerns.
However, Marcums audit reports for 2024 and 2023 included an explanatory paragraph about substantial doubt regarding the companys ability to continue as a going concern, a material disclosure that remains relevant to investors and financial analysis until resolved in future financial statements.
TL;DR: Auditor transition appears orderly and Board-approved; absence of disagreements suggests governance processes addressed the change appropriately.
The engagement of CBIZ CPAs was approved by the Board and described as taking over services previously provided by Marcum, indicating an organized handoff. The company provided Marcum with a draft of this Form 8-K and requested a letter from Marcum, consistent with disclosure protocols. The filings statement of no disagreements or reportable events is a governance-positive element.
Nonetheless, the presence of a going-concern explanatory paragraph in the prior auditors reports is a substantive disclosure that governance and management must address through financial remediation or additional disclosure in upcoming filings.
8-K Event Classification
FAQ
Why did Marker Therapeutics (MRKR) change auditors?
When will CBIZ CPAs begin reviewing MRKRs financial statements?
Did Marcums prior audit reports contain qualifications?
Were there any disagreements or reportable events with Marcum?
Is there any auditor correspondence filed with the 8-K?