Nautilus Biotech: 45k Share Option Grant to Director Melissa Epperly
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Form 4 overview: On 06/23/2025, Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. (ticker NAUT) granted Director Melissa B. Epperly a new equity award.
- Security type: Non-qualified stock option (right to buy common stock).
- Shares underlying option: 45,000.
- Exercise price: $0.6951 per share.
- Term: Expires 06/23/2035 (10-year life).
- Vesting schedule: Monthly vesting in 12 equal instalments, subject to Ms. Epperly maintaining “Service Provider” status, as defined in the company’s 2021 Equity Incentive Plan.
- Post-transaction beneficial ownership (derivative form): 45,000 options held directly.
The filing reports no disposals or open-market purchases of common stock; the only activity is the A-coded (grant) issuance of the option. No Rule 10b5-1 trading plan is indicated. The form was signed on 06/24/2025 by attorney-in-fact Mathew B. Murphy.
Investor takeaway: This is a routine director compensation grant that minimally affects share count but incrementally aligns the director’s incentives with shareholder value creation.
Positive
- Alignment of incentives: Granting options ties director compensation to future share performance, potentially benefiting shareholders.
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: Routine 45k option grant to director; negligible dilution, neutral for valuation.
The 45,000-share option grant represents a very small fraction of NAUT’s outstanding shares and therefore has immaterial dilution. The $0.6951 strike embeds upside incentive aligned with shareholder returns. No sale activity occurred, so there is no bearish signal. From a cash-flow standpoint the grant is non-cash; future accounting expense will be spread over the 12-month vesting period, likely insignificant to earnings given the company’s R&D cost structure. Overall impact on equity value, liquidity, and float is de minimis, so I classify the filing as neutral.
TL;DR: Standard director compensation; supports incentive alignment, no governance red flags.
The option vests monthly over one year, a structure that encourages continuous board engagement without creating an excessive overhang. The 10-year term matches market norms. Absence of a Rule 10b5-1 declaration indicates the grant is ordinary-course, not linked to a pre-planned trading program. No accelerated vesting clauses are disclosed, reducing potential governance risk. I see no conflict-of-interest concerns in this filing, and the modest size aligns with peer director compensation practices.