SWK to merge into Runway Growth Finance (RWAY) — SWK holders get stock or cash plus $9M
SWK Holdings Corporation seeks stockholder approval to merge into Runway Growth Finance Corp. through a three-step transaction, subject to SWK stockholder vote at a virtual special meeting on March 31, 2026. Each SWK share will convert, at holder election, into Per Share Stock Consideration (shares of RWAY) or Per Share Cash Consideration (equal to SWK Per Share NAV), plus a pro rata portion of a $9,000,000 guaranteed cash payment from the Adviser. The Exchange Ratio is the quotient of SWK Per Share NAV divided by RWAY Per Share NAV, both calculated within two business days prior to closing and rounded to four decimals. As of the record date March 2, 2026, there were 12,095,906 shares of SWK Common Stock outstanding. The SWK Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the proposals.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
Transaction swaps SWK equity for RWAY equity or cash plus a $9.0M adviser-funded cash top-up.
The deal uses an exchange ratio tied to each party’s NAVs calculated within two business days of closing, limiting price uncertainty but relying heavily on contemporaneous valuations and a valuation firm process for SWK’s adjudicated portfolio values.
Timing hinges on shareholder approval and closing conditions; the adviser-funded $9,000,000 payment is explicitly allocated pro rata to SWK shares.
Deal structure is a three-step merger governed by a detailed merger agreement with customary closing conditions and appraisal rights under Delaware law.
The agreement includes election mechanics, pro rata haircut provisions if stock or cash election caps are exceeded, and indemnification and D&O tail coverage provisions. Appraisal rights under Section 262 are preserved for dissenting SWK holders.
Closing requires SWK stockholder majority and satisfaction or waiver of contractual and regulatory conditions; litigation or consent failures could delay or terminate the transaction.
AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.
FAQ
What will RWAY (RWAY) give SWK stockholders in the merger?
When and how do SWK (RWAY) shareholders vote on the merger?
Is the merger taxable for SWK stockholders (RWAY)?
How is the Exchange Ratio determined in the RWAY–SWK transaction?
What vote threshold is required to approve the SWK merger proposal?
Table of Contents
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
File No.: 333-291634
SWK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
5956 Sherry Lane
Suite 650
Dallas, Texas 75225
MERGER PROPOSED — YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
March 3, 2026
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Special Meeting of Stockholders (the “SWK Special Meeting”) of SWK Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“SWK”), to be held virtually on March 31, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, at the following website: meetnow.global/MAFJD7K. Stockholders of record of SWK at the close of business on March 2, 2026 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the SWK Special Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
The notice of special meeting and the proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this letter provide an outline of the business to be conducted at the SWK Special Meeting. At the SWK Special Meeting, you will be asked to:
The closing of the Mergers is contingent upon (a) the approval of the First Merger by holders of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of SWK (such shares of common stock, “SWK Common Stock” and, such holders, “SWK Stockholders”) and (b) the satisfaction or waiver of certain other closing conditions.
RWAY and SWK are proposing a combination of both companies by a merger and related transactions pursuant to the Merger Agreement in which SWK will merge with and into Acquisition Sub, with Acquisition Sub continuing as the surviving company and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediary Sub (the “First Merger”). Following the effectiveness of the First Merger, Acquisition Sub will merge with and into Intermediary Sub (the “Second Merger”), with Intermediary Sub continuing as the surviving company and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of RWAY. Immediately after effectiveness of the Second Merger, Intermediary Sub will merge with and into RWAY (the “Third Merger” and, together with the First Merger and the Second Merger, the “Mergers”), with RWAY continuing as the surviving corporation. RWAY is a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the 1940 Act (as defined below).
Table of Contents
Holders of RWAY’s shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “RWAY Common Stock”) are not required to vote on and approve the Mergers. RWAY’s board of directors has approved, among other things, the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the time the First Merger becomes effective (the “Effective Time”), each share of SWK Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than shares held by subsidiaries of SWK or held, directly or indirectly by RWAY, Intermediary Sub and Acquisition Sub and all treasury shares, collectively “Cancelled Shares”) will be converted, at the election of the respective SWK Stockholder, into the right to receive (A) (i) newly issued shares of RWAY Common Stock equal to the Exchange Ratio (as defined below) (the “Per Share Stock Consideration”) or (ii) an amount of cash equal to the SWK Per Share NAV (as defined below) (the “Per Share Cash Consideration” and, together with the Per Share Stock Consideration, the “Per Share Merger Consideration”) plus (B) a pro rata share of the guaranteed cash payment of $9,000,000 being paid by the Adviser (the “Per Share Guaranteed Cash Payment” and, together with the Per Share Merger Consideration, the “Total Per Share Consideration”).
Two (2) days prior (excluding Sundays and holidays) to the closing of the First Merger (such date, the “Determination Date”), each of RWAY and SWK will deliver to the other a calculation of its estimated net asset value as of such date (such calculation with respect to SWK, the “Closing SWK Net Asset Value” and such calculation with respect to RWAY, the “Closing RWAY Net Asset Value”), in each case calculated in good faith and determined in accordance with the accounting and reporting guidance set forth in the United States generally accepted accounting principles’ Accounting Standards Certification topic 946 – Financial Services – Investment Companies (“ASC 946”). Based on such calculations, the parties will calculate: (1) the “SWK Per Share NAV,” which will be equal to (i) the Closing SWK Net Asset Value divided by (ii) the number of shares of SWK Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the Determination Date (other than Cancelled Shares) and (2) the “RWAY Per Share NAV,” which will be equal to (i) the Closing RWAY Net Asset Value divided by (ii) the number of shares of RWAY Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the Determination Date. The “Exchange Ratio” will be equal to the quotient (rounded to four decimal places) of (i) the SWK Per Share NAV divided by (ii) the RWAY Per Share NAV.
With respect to the Closing SWK Net Asset Value, in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, such calculation will be approved by SWK’s board of directors (“the SWK Board”) and determined in accordance with the adjudicated portfolio value as determined in coordination with a valuation firm, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus.
RWAY and SWK will update and redeliver the Closing RWAY Company Net Asset Value or the Closing SWK Net Asset Value, respectively, in the event that the closing of the Mergers is subsequently materially delayed or there is a material change to such calculation between the Determination Date and the closing of the Mergers and as needed to ensure that the calculation is determined within two (2) days (excluding Sundays and holidays) prior to the Effective Time.
Your vote is extremely important. Holders of a majority of the voting power of all shares of SWK Common Stock entitled to vote at the SWK Special Meeting must be present at the SWK Special Meeting, virtually or represented by proxy, to establish a quorum and conduct business. At the SWK Special Meeting, you will be asked to vote on the Merger Proposal. The approval of the Merger Proposal requires the affirmative vote of SWK Stockholders representing a majority of the outstanding shares of SWK Common Stock entitled to vote at the SWK Special Meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes “AGAINST” the Merger Proposal.
After careful consideration, the SWK Board unanimously approved, adopted and determined advisable the Merger Agreement, including the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger), and unanimously recommends that SWK Stockholders vote “FOR” each of the Proposals. The SWK Board did not make a determination as to the advisability of the Second Merger and Third Merger as such transactions would not have an effect on the Total Per Share Consideration to be received by SWK Stockholders or otherwise affect the rights and entitlements of SWK Stockholders in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
It is important that your shares be represented at the SWK Special Meeting. Please follow the instructions on the enclosed proxy card and authorize a proxy to vote your shares via the Internet, by telephone or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card. SWK encourages you to authorize a proxy to vote your shares via the Internet as it saves SWK significant time and processing costs. Voting by proxy does not deprive you of your right to participate in the virtual SWK Special Meeting.
The proxy statement/prospectus describes the SWK Special Meeting, the Mergers and the documents related to the Mergers (including the Merger Agreement) and other related matters that SWK Stockholders should review before voting on the Proposals and should be retained for future reference. Please carefully read this entire document, including the section entitled “Risk Factors” and as otherwise incorporated by reference in the proxy
Table of Contents
statement/prospectus, for a discussion of the risks relating to the Mergers, SWK and RWAY. SWK files periodic reports, current reports, proxy statements and other information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). This information is available free of charge, and stockholder inquiries can be made by contacting SWK at 5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 650, Dallas, TX, 75225 or by calling SWK at (972) 687-7252 or on SWK’s website at https://investors.swkhold.com/sec-filings. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains such information. Except for the documents incorporated by reference into the proxy statement/prospectus, information on SWK’s website is not incorporated into or a part of the proxy statement/prospectus. Additional information about RWAY has been filed with the SEC and is available upon request and without charge by contacting RWAY at 205 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 4200 Chicago, Illinois 60601, or by calling RWAY at (312) 698-6902.
No matter how many or few shares of SWK you own, your vote and participation are very important to us.
|
Sincerely yours, |
|
|
|
Laurie L. Dotter |
|
Chair of the Board |
Neither the SEC nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the shares of SWK Common Stock to be issued under the proxy statement/prospectus or determined if the proxy statement/prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The proxy statement/prospectus is dated March 3, 2026 and is first being mailed or otherwise delivered to SWK Stockholders on or about March 3, 2026.
Runway Growth Finance Corp. 205 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 4200 Chicago, Illinois 60601 (312) 698-6902 |
SWK Holdings Corporation 5956 Sherry Lane Suite 650 Dallas, TX, 75225 (972) 687-7250 |
Table of Contents
SWK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
5956 Sherry Lane
Suite 650
Dallas, Texas 75225
NOTICE OF VIRTUAL SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Online Meeting Only — No Physical Meeting Location
meetnow.global/MAFJD7K
March 31, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., Central Time
Dear Stockholder:
A Special Meeting of Stockholders (the “SWK Special Meeting”) of SWK Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“SWK”), will be conducted online on March 31, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., Central Time at the following website: meetnow.global/MAFJD7K.
At the SWK Special Meeting, holders of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of SWK (such shares of common stock, “SWK Common Stock” and, such holders, “SWK Stockholders”) will consider and vote on proposals to:
RWAY and SWK are proposing a combination of both companies by a merger and related transactions pursuant to the Merger Agreement in which SWK will merge with and into Acquisition Sub, with Acquisition Sub continuing as the surviving company and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediary Sub (the “First Merger”). Following the effectiveness of the First Merger, Acquisition Sub will merge with and into Intermediary Sub (the “Second Merger”), with Intermediary Sub continuing as the surviving company and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of RWAY. Immediately after effectiveness of the Second Merger, Intermediary Sub will merge with and into RWAY (the “Third Merger” and, together with the First Merger and the Second Merger, the “Mergers”), with RWAY continuing as the surviving corporation.
Table of Contents
AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SWK UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MERGER AGREEMENT, DETERMINED THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE OTHER TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY (OTHER THAN THE SECOND MERGER AND THE THIRD MERGER) ADVISABLE AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SWK STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE PROPOSALS.
You have the right to receive notice of, and to vote at, the SWK Special Meeting if you were a stockholder of record of SWK at the close of business on March 2, 2026. A proxy statement/prospectus is attached to this Notice that describes the matters to be voted upon at the SWK Special Meeting or any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof. The enclosed proxy card will instruct you as to how you may authorize a proxy to vote your shares via the Internet, by telephone or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card. In addition, information regarding how to find the logistical details of the virtual SWK Special Meeting (including how to remotely access, participate in and vote during the virtual meeting) is included in the section entitled “The SWK Special Meeting” of the attached proxy statement/prospectus.
Whether or not you plan to participate in the SWK Special Meeting, we encourage you to authorize a proxy to vote your shares by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card. Please note, however, that if you wish to vote during the SWK Special Meeting and your shares are held of record by a broker or nominee, you must obtain a “legal” proxy issued in your name from that record holder.
We are not aware of any other business that may properly be brought before the SWK Special Meeting.
Thank you for your continued support of SWK.
|
By order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
Joe D. Staggs |
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
Dallas, TX
March 3, 2026
To ensure proper representation at the SWK Special Meeting, please follow the instructions on the enclosed proxy card to authorize a proxy to vote your shares via the Internet or telephone, or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card. Even if you authorize a proxy to vote your shares prior to the virtual SWK Special Meeting, you still may participate in the virtual SWK Special Meeting.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT |
8 |
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SWK SPECIAL MEETING AND THE MERGERS |
9 |
SUMMARY OF THE MERGERS |
18 |
RISK FACTORS |
30 |
COMPARATIVE FEES AND EXPENSES |
34 |
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS |
37 |
CAPITALIZATION |
39 |
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
40 |
THE SWK SPECIAL MEETING |
65 |
THE MERGERS |
68 |
DESCRIPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT |
108 |
DESCRIPTION OF KEY STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT |
124 |
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF THE MERGERS |
125 |
CERTAIN MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS |
126 |
SWK PROPOSAL 1 — APPROVAL OF THE MERGER PROPOSAL |
137 |
SWK PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION PROPOSAL |
138 |
SWK PROPOSAL 3 — APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROPOSAL |
139 |
SWK PROPOSAL 4 — APPROVAL OF THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL |
140 |
MARKET PRICE, DIVIDEND AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION |
141 |
MANAGEMENT OF RWAY AND SWK |
143 |
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT OF RWAY |
144 |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS OF RWAY |
146 |
BUSINESS OF RWAY |
146 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS OF RWAY |
146 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF RWAY |
146 |
SENIOR SECURITIES OF RWAY |
146 |
PORTFOLIO COMPANIES OF RWAY |
147 |
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF RWAY |
155 |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS OF SWK |
157 |
BUSINESS OF SWK |
157 |
PROPERTIES |
157 |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
157 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF SWK |
157 |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
157 |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
157 |
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF SWK |
157 |
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF RWAY |
159 |
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF SWK |
165 |
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN OF RWAY |
166 |
COMPARISON OF RWAY AND SWK STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS |
168 |
CUSTODIAN, TRANSFER AND DISTRIBUTION PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR |
176 |
BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES |
176 |
LEGAL MATTERS |
176 |
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS |
177 |
Table of Contents
OTHER MATTERS |
177 |
STOCKHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS |
178 |
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION |
179 |
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE FOR RWAY |
180 |
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE FOR SWK |
180 |
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
182 |
ANNEX A — MERGER AGREEMENT |
A-1 |
ANNEX B — OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR TO SWK |
B-1 |
Table of Contents
ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT
This document, which forms part of a registration statement on Form N-14 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) by Runway Growth Finance Corp., a Maryland corporation (“RWAY”), (File No. 333-291634), constitutes a prospectus under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), with respect to the shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of RWAY (“RWAY Common Stock” and, such holders, “RWAY Stockholders”) to be issued to holders of the shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of SWK Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“SWK”) (such shares of common stock, “SWK Common Stock,” and such holders, “SWK Stockholders”) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 9, 2025, by and among RWAY; SWK; RWAY Portfolio Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of RWAY (“Intermediary Sub”); RWAY Portfolio Corp., a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediary Sub (“Acquisition Sub”); and Runway Growth Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the external investment adviser to RWAY (the “Adviser”) (as may be amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”).
RWAY and SWK are proposing a combination of both companies by a merger and related transactions pursuant to the Merger Agreement in which SWK will merge with and into Acquisition Sub, with Acquisition Sub continuing as the surviving company and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediary Sub (the “First Merger”). Following the effectiveness of the First Merger, Acquisition Sub, will merge with and into Intermediary Sub (the “Second Merger”), with Intermediary Sub continuing as the surviving company and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of RWAY. Immediately after effectiveness of the Second Merger, Intermediary Sub will merge with and into RWAY (the “Third Merger” and, together with the First Merger and the Second Merger, the “Mergers”), with RWAY continuing as the surviving corporation (the “Combined Company”).
This document also constitutes a proxy statement of SWK under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). It also constitutes a notice of meeting with respect to the Special Meeting of SWK Stockholders (the “SWK Special Meeting”), at which SWK Stockholders will be asked to vote upon the Merger Proposal, the Compensation Proposal, the Director Compensation Proposal and Adjournment Proposal (as defined below).
As described above, SWK Stockholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals at the SWK Special Meeting:
You should rely only on the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus, including in determining how to vote your shares of SWK Common Stock. No one has been authorized to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. This proxy statement/prospectus is dated March 3, 2026. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other than that date. Neither any mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus to SWK Stockholders nor the issuance of RWAY Common Stock in connection with the First Merger will create any implication to the contrary.
This proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom it is unlawful to make any such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction.
Except where the context otherwise indicates, information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus regarding RWAY has been provided by RWAY and information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus regarding SWK has been provided by SWK.
8
Table of Contents
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SWK SPECIAL MEETING AND THE MERGERS
The questions and answers below highlight only selected information from this proxy statement/prospectus. They do not contain all of the information that may be important to you. You should read carefully this entire document to fully understand the Merger Agreement, which is attached as Annex A hereto, and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Mergers) and the voting procedures for the SWK Special Meeting.
Questions and Answers about the SWK Special Meeting
Q: |
|
Why am I receiving these materials? |
A: |
|
SWK is furnishing these materials in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of SWK (the “SWK Board”) for use at the SWK Special Meeting to be held virtually on March 31, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, at the following website: meetnow.global/MAFJD7K, and any adjournments or postponements thereof. |
|
|
This proxy statement/prospectus and the accompanying materials are being mailed on or about March 3, 2026 to stockholders of record of SWK described below and are available at www.investorvote.com/SWKH. |
|
|
The SWK Special Meeting is being held in connection with the proposed Mergers. The Adviser believes the Mergers will position the Combined Company to continue to deliver strong risk-adjusted returns and investment performance for both stockholders of RWAY (the “RWAY Stockholders”) and SWK Stockholders, and that the Mergers will provide several immediate and long-term benefits to SWK Stockholders. See the sections entitled “The Mergers – Board Recommendation; Reasons for the Mergers – SWK Reasons for the Mergers” and “Summary of the Mergers – Merger Structure” for additional information. |
Q: |
|
What items will be considered and voted on at the SWK Special Meeting? |
A: |
|
At the SWK Special Meeting, SWK Stockholders will be asked to approve (i) the First Merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement (i.e., the Merger Proposal), (ii) Compensation Proposal, (iii) the Director Compensation Proposal and (iv) the Adjournment Proposal. |
Q: |
|
How does the SWK Board recommend voting on the Proposals at the SWK Special Meeting? |
A: |
|
After careful consideration, the SWK Board unanimously approved, adopted and determined advisable the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) and unanimously recommends that SWK Stockholders vote “FOR” the Merger Proposal, the Compensation Proposal, the Director Compensation Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal (collectively, the “SWK Board Recommendation”). |
Q: |
|
If I am an SWK Stockholder, what is the “record date” and what does it mean? |
A: |
|
The record date for the SWK Special Meeting is the close of business on March 2, 2026 (the “SWK Record Date”). The SWK Record Date was established by the SWK Board, and only holders of record of shares of SWK Common Stock on the SWK Record Date are entitled to receive notice of the SWK Special Meeting and vote at the SWK Special Meeting. As of the SWK Record Date, there were 12,095,906 shares of SWK Common Stock and no shares of SWK preferred stock (the “SWK Preferred Stock”) issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the SWK Special Meeting. |
9
Table of Contents
Q: |
|
If I am a SWK Stockholder, how many votes do I have? |
A: |
|
Each share of SWK Common Stock held by a holder of record as of the SWK Record Date (i.e., March 2, 2026) has one vote on each matter to be considered at the SWK Special Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
Q: |
|
If I am a SWK Stockholder, how do I vote? |
A: |
|
The SWK Special Meeting will be hosted virtually via live Internet webcast. Any record holders of SWK Common Stock or their validly authorized proxy holders can attend the SWK Special Meeting at meetnow.global/MAFJD7K. If you were a record holder of SWK Common Stock as of the SWK Record Date, you can vote at the SWK Special Meeting. It is important to note that SWK Stockholders have the same rights and opportunities by participating in a virtual meeting as they would if attending an in-person meeting. A summary of the information you need to attend the SWK Special Meeting online is as follows: |
|
|
• the webcast will start at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, on March 31, 2026. Online check-in will begin at 8:30 a.m., Central Time. Please allow time for online check-in procedures. For further assistance should you need it you may call Local 1-888-724-2416 or International +1-781-575-2748; • record holders of SWK Common Stock and their validly authorized proxy holders may vote and submit questions while attending the SWK Special Meeting via the Internet; and • SWK Stockholders will need a control number to enter the SWK Special Meeting. A record holder of SWK Common Stock may also authorize a proxy by telephone or through the Internet using the toll-free telephone numbers or web address printed on your proxy card. Authorizing a proxy by telephone or through the Internet requires you to input the control number located on your proxy card. After inputting the control number, you will be prompted to direct your proxy to vote on the Merger Proposal in accordance with your instructions. You will have an opportunity to review your directions and make any necessary changes before submitting your directions and terminating the telephone call or Internet link. • By Internet: www.investorvote.com/SWKH or scanning the QR Barcode on the enclosed proxy card. • By telephone: 1-800-652-8683 to reach a toll-free voting line. • By mail: You may also authorize a proxy to vote your shares by mail by following the directions and indicating your instructions on the enclosed proxy card, dating and signing the proxy card, and promptly returning the proxy card in the envelope provided, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States. Please allow sufficient time for your proxy card to be received on or prior to 11:59 p.m., Central Time, on March 30, 2026. |
|
|
Important Notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the SWK Special Meeting. The proxy statement/prospectus and the proxy card are available at www.investorvote.com/SWKH. |
Q: |
|
What if an SWK Stockholder does not specify a choice for a matter when authorizing a proxy? |
A: |
|
All properly executed proxies representing shares of SWK Common Stock received at the SWK Special Meeting will be voted in accordance with the directions given. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the shares of SWK Common Stock will be voted “FOR” each of the Proposals. |
10
Table of Contents
Q: |
|
If I am a SWK Stockholder, how can I revoke a proxy? |
A: |
|
Yes. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote by giving notice at any time before your proxy is exercised. A revocation may be effected by resubmitting voting instructions via the Internet voting site, by telephone, by obtaining and properly completing another proxy card that is dated later than the original proxy card and returning it, by mail, in time to be received before the SWK Special Meeting, by attending the SWK Special Meeting and voting in person (virtually), or by a notice, provided in writing and signed by you, delivered to SWK’s Secretary on any business day before the date of the SWK Special Meeting. |
Q: |
|
How do I vote shares of SWK Common Stock held through a broker or nominee? |
A: |
|
If you hold shares of SWK Common Stock through a broker or nominee, you must direct your intermediary regarding how you would like your shares voted by following the voting instructions you receive from your broker or nominee. Please instruct your broker or nominee regarding how you would like your shares voted so your vote can be counted. |
Q: |
|
What constitutes a “quorum” for the SWK Special Meeting? |
A: |
|
For SWK to conduct business at the SWK Special Meeting, a quorum of SWK Stockholders must be present. The holders of at least a majority of the voting power of all shares of SWK Common Stock entitled to vote at the SWK Special Meeting must be present at the SWK Special Meeting, in person (virtually) or represented by proxy, to constitute a quorum for the SWK Special Meeting. Abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. We do not expect any broker non-votes at the SWK Special Meeting because the Merger Proposal, the Compensation Proposal, the Director Compensation Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal are non-routine matters on which your bank, broker or other nominee cannot vote without your instructions. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker who holds shares for the beneficial owner does not vote on a proposal because the broker does not have discretionary voting authority for that proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Accordingly, if you own SWK Common Stock through a broker or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”), you must provide voting instructions in accordance with the instructions on the voting instruction card that your broker or other nominee provides to you, as brokers and other nominees do not have discretionary voting authority with respect to any of the proposals described in this proxy statement/prospectus. You should instruct your broker or other nominee as to how to vote your SWK Common Stock following the directions contained in such voting instruction card. |
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve each of the Proposals being considered at the SWK Special Meeting? |
A: |
|
Merger Proposal: The affirmative vote of holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of the outstanding shares of SWK Common Stock entitled to vote at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Merger Proposal (“SWK Stockholder Approval”). Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Merger Proposal, although abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the shares of SWK Common Stock will be voted “FOR” the Merger Proposal. Compensation Proposal: The affirmative vote of holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of all votes properly cast is required to approve the Compensation Proposal. Abstentions will have no effect on the voting outcome of the Compensation Proposal, although abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. Director Compensation Proposal: The affirmative vote of holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of all votes properly cast is required to approve the Director Compensation Proposal. Abstentions will have no effect on the voting outcome of the Director Compensation Proposal, although abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. |
11
Table of Contents
|
|
Adjournment Proposal: The affirmative vote of holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of all votes properly cast is required to approve the Adjournment Proposal. Abstentions will have no effect on the voting outcome of the Adjournment Proposal, although abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. |
Q: |
|
What will happen if the Merger Proposal being considered at the SWK Special Meeting is not approved by the required vote? |
A: |
|
As discussed in more detail in the section entitled “Description of the Merger Agreement – Conditions to Closing the Mergers,” the closing of the First Merger (the “Closing”) is conditioned upon the approval by SWK Stockholders of the Merger Proposal and satisfaction or waiver of certain other closing conditions. If the Mergers do not close because SWK Stockholders do not approve the Merger Proposal or any of the other conditions to the Closing are not satisfied or waived, each of RWAY and SWK will continue to operate as a stand-alone company pursuant to the current agreements in place for each, and each of RWAY’s and SWK’s respective directors and officers will continue to serve as its directors and officers, respectively, until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or their resignation.
|
Q: |
|
When will the final voting results be announced? |
A: |
|
Final voting results will be published by SWK in a Current Report on Form 8-K following the SWK Special Meeting. |
Q: |
|
Will SWK incur expenses in soliciting proxies? |
A: |
|
SWK will bear the cost of the solicitation of proxies. SWK has not retained a solicitor for these purposes. For more information regarding expenses related to the Mergers, see the section entitled “Questions and Answers about the Mergers – Who is responsible for paying the expenses relating to completing the Mergers?” |
Q: |
|
What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card? |
A: |
|
Some of your shares of SWK Common Stock, as applicable, may be registered differently or held in a different account. You should authorize a proxy to vote the shares in each of your accounts via the Internet or by mail or telephone. If you mail proxy cards, please sign, date and return each proxy card to ensure that all of your shares are voted. If you hold your shares in registered form and wish to combine your stockholder accounts in the future, you should call SWK’s Investor Relations department at (778) 323-0959. |
Q: |
|
Are the proxy materials available electronically? |
A: |
|
In addition to mailing hard copies of the proxy materials, SWK has made the registration statement (of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part), the Notice of Virtual Special Meeting of SWK Stockholders and the proxy card available to SWK Stockholders on the Internet. Stockholders may (i) access and review the proxy materials of SWK, (ii) authorize their proxies, as described in the sections entitled “The SWK Special Meeting – Voting of Proxies,” and/or (iii) elect to receive certain future proxy materials by electronic delivery via the Internet address provided below. The registration statement (of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part), the Notice of Virtual Special Meeting of Stockholders and the proxy card are available at https://investors.swkhold.com/sec-filings. |
12
Table of Contents
Q: |
|
Will my vote make a difference? |
A: |
|
Yes; your vote is very important. Your vote is needed to ensure the Proposals can be acted upon. Please submit your proxy immediately to help avoid potential delays and save significant additional expenses associated with soliciting stockholder votes. |
Q: |
|
Whom can I contact with any additional questions? |
A: |
|
If you are an SWK Stockholder, you can contact SWK’s Investor Relations department at the below contact information with any additional questions: Alliance Advisors IR Susan Xu Investor Relations sxu@allianceadvisors.com 778-323-0959 |
Q: |
|
Where can I find more information about RWAY and SWK? |
A: |
|
You can find more information about RWAY and SWK in the documents referenced in the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.” |
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
A: |
|
We urge you to carefully read this entire document, including its annexes and the documents (including the Merger Agreement) incorporated by reference. You should also review the documents referenced under the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” and consult with your accounting, legal and tax advisors. |
Questions and Answers about the Mergers |
||
Q: |
|
What will happen in the Mergers? |
A: |
|
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the time the First Merger becomes effective (the “Effective Time”), SWK will merge with and into Acquisition Sub, with Acquisition Sub surviving the First Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediary Sub (i.e., the First Merger). Immediately following the occurrence of the Effective Time (the “Second Effective Time”), Acquisition Sub will merge with and into Intermediary Sub (i.e., the Second Merger). Intermediary Sub will be the surviving company and continue its existence as a corporation under the laws of the state of Delaware, and the corporate existence of Acquisition Sub will cease to exist. Immediately following the Second Effective Time, Intermediary Sub will merge with and into RWAY (i.e., the Third Merger). RWAY will be the surviving company in the Third Merger and will continue its existence as a corporation under the laws of the state of Maryland. At the time of the Third Merger, the separate existence of Intermediary Sub will cease. |
13
Table of Contents
Q: |
|
What will SWK Stockholders receive in the Mergers? |
A: |
|
SWK Stockholders, based on their election, will receive (A) (i) a number of shares of RWAY Common Stock equal to the Exchange Ratio (as defined below) and, if applicable, cash will be paid in lieu of fractional shares (the “Per Share Stock Consideration”) or (ii) or an amount of cash equal to the SWK Per Share NAV (as defined below) (the “Per Share Cash Consideration” and, together with the Per Share Stock Consideration, the “Per Share Merger Consideration”) plus (B) a pro rata share of the guaranteed cash payment of $9,000,000 being paid by the Adviser (the “Per Share Guaranteed Cash Payment” and, together with the Per Share Merger Consideration, the “Total Per Share Consideration”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, SWK Stockholders may receive a form or combination of consideration different from what If, after giving effect to the elections, the aggregate amount of cash (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, cash in lieu of See the section entitled “Risk Factors – Risks Relating to the Mergers” for a more detailed discussion. |
Q: |
|
Is the Exchange Ratio subject to any adjustment? |
A: |
|
Yes. The Exchange Ratio will be appropriately adjusted to provide the same economic effect if, between the two (2) days prior (excluding Sundays and holidays) to the closing of the First Merger (such date, the “Determination Date”) and the Effective Time, the respective outstanding shares of RWAY Common Stock or SWK Common Stock will have been increased or decreased or changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or securities, in each case, as a result of any reclassification, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, split-up, combination or exchange of shares, or if a stock dividend or dividend payable in any other securities will be authorized and declared with a record date within such period, as permitted by the Merger Agreement. Because the Exchange Ratio will be determined within two (2) days (excluding Sundays and holidays) prior to the Effective Time, the time period during which such an adjustment could occur will be relatively short. |
Q: |
|
Who is responsible for paying the expenses relating to completing the Mergers? |
A: |
|
RWAY and SWK will be responsible for paying certain expenses in connection with the Mergers, and as a result, RWAY Stockholders and SWK Stockholders will bear these costs. Specifically, all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Mergers) will be paid by the party incurring such fees or expenses, whether or not the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (including the Mergers) are consummated. Notwithstanding the foregoing, RWAY will bear certain fees and expenses, including relating to (i) the termination of SWK’s real property leases, (ii) the calling of SWK’s 9.00% Notes due 2027 issued pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of October 3, 2023, by and between SWK and Wilmington Trust, National Association (as amended pursuant to the First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 3, 2023, by and between SWK and Wilmington Trust, National Association) (the "SWK Notes") (iii) the preparation, filing and printing of this registration statement and proxy |
14
Table of Contents
|
|
statement/prospectus, (iv) the preparation and filing of any required applications, notices or other filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”) and (v) any severance amounts or other costs or expenses incurred by SWK in connection with the termination of any employee or service provider of SWK or any of its subsidiaries who was employed by or provided services to SWK as of the date of the Merger Agreement and who is terminated following the date of the Merger Agreement; provided that, for purposes of the calculation of such costs, the 2025 annual bonus owed to any such employee will not be considered to be a liability associated with the termination of such employee. Additionally, SWK will bear fees and expenses relating to (i) the procurement of a “tail” insurance policy for the extension of the directors’ and officers’ liability coverage of SWK’s existing directors’ and officers’ insurance policies, as required pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, (ii) the engagement of a valuation firm for the purposes of providing good faith determination of a valuation range with respect to each of SWK’s portfolio assets and (iii) the arranging, announcing and holding of the SWK Special Meeting, including the costs of printing and mailing of SWK’s DEFM-14A to SWK Stockholders in preparation for the SWK Special Meeting and the retention of a proxy solicitor. Total transaction costs for RWAY are estimated to be $6.7 million and total transaction costs for SWK are estimated to be $3.2 million. |
Q: |
|
What are the pro forma costs and expenses estimated to be incurred by the Combined Company in the first year following completion of the Mergers? |
A: |
|
The following table is intended to assist SWK Stockholders in understanding the costs and expenses that an investor in shares of RWAY Common Stock bears directly or indirectly and, based on the assumptions described in the section entitled “Comparative Fees and Expenses,” the pro forma costs and expenses estimated to be incurred by the Combined Company in the first year following completion of the Mergers. We caution you that some of the percentages in the table below are estimates and may vary. The table below is based on information as of September 30, 2025 for each party (except as noted below), and includes expenses of the applicable consolidated subsidiaries. Any footing differences are due to rounding. See the section entitled “Comparative Fees and Expenses” for additional details and assumptions. |
|
|
Actual |
|
Pro Forma |
|||||
|
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
RWAY |
|||
Annual expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Fee payable under the RWAY Investment Advisory Agreement |
|
3.11 |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
3.42 |
% |
Incentive Fee payable under the RWAY Investment Advisory Agreement |
|
2.59 |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
2.83 |
% |
Interest payments and fees paid on borrowed funds |
|
8.69 |
% |
|
1.78 |
% |
|
9.14 |
% |
Other expenses |
|
1.68 |
% |
|
8.57 |
% |
|
1.59 |
% |
Total annual expenses |
|
16.07 |
% |
|
10.35 |
% |
|
16.98 |
% |
Q: |
|
Will I receive distributions after the Mergers? |
A: |
|
Subject to applicable legal restrictions and the sole discretion of the RWAY Board, after the Mergers, RWAY intends to declare and pay regular dividends to RWAY Stockholders on a quarterly basis, which is consistent with the current frequency of dividends to RWAY Stockholders. For a history of the dividend declarations and payments by RWAY since March 31, 2022, see the section entitled “Market Price, Dividend and Distribution Information.” The amount and timing of past dividends are not a guarantee of any future dividends, or the amount thereof, the payment, timing and amount of which will be determined by the RWAY Board and depend on RWAY’s financial condition and earnings, contractual restrictions, legal and regulatory considerations and other factors. See the section entitled “Dividend Reinvestment Plan of RWAY” for information regarding RWAY’s dividend reinvestment plan (the “RWAY DRIP”). Following the Effective Time, the holders of shares of SWK Common Stock will be entitled to receive dividends declared by the RWAY Board with a record date after the Effective Time therefore payable with respect to the whole shares of RWAY Common Stock received as part of the Per Share Merger Consideration. |
Q: |
|
Are the Mergers subject to any third party consents? |
A: |
|
Under the Merger Agreement, RWAY and SWK have agreed to will use their respective reasonable best efforts to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated thereby and to cause the conditions to the First Merger to be satisfied, including using reasonable best efforts to accomplish the following: (i) the obtaining of all necessary actions or |
15
Table of Contents
|
|
non-actions, consents and approvals from governmental authorities or other persons necessary in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the First Merger, and the making of all necessary registrations and filings and the taking of all reasonable steps as may be necessary to obtain an approval from, or to avoid a proceeding by, any governmental authority or other persons necessary in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the First Merger; (ii) the defending of any lawsuits or other legal proceedings, whether judicial or administrative, challenging the Merger Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the First Merger, performed or consummated by such party in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, including seeking to have any stay or temporary restraining order entered by any court or other governmental authority vacated or reversed; and (iii) the execution and delivery of any additional instruments reasonably necessary to consummate the First Merger and any other transactions to be performed or consummated by such party in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement and to carry out fully the purposes of the Agreement. |
Q: |
|
How does RWAY’s investment objective, strategy and risks differ from SWK’s? |
A: |
|
RWAY’s investment objective is to maximize its total return to its stockholders primarily through current income on its loan portfolio and secondarily through capital gains on its warrants and other equity positions. RWAY invests in senior secured term loans and other senior debt obligations and may on occasion invest in second lien loans. RWAY has and continues to expect to acquire warrants and other equity securities from portfolio companies in connection with RWAY’s investments in loans to these companies. RWAY focuses on lending to late and growth stage companies in technology, life sciences, healthcare information and services, business services, financial services, select consumer sectors and other high-growth industries. RWAY is generally the sole lender to its portfolio companies and generally does not actively syndicate the loans it originates to other lenders. RWAY may on occasion participate in syndications built by other lenders. RWAY originates its investments through two strategies: Sponsored Growth Lending and Non-Sponsored Growth Lending. RWAY’s Sponsored Growth Lending strategy generally includes loans to late and growth stage companies that are already backed by established venture capital firms. RWAY’s Sponsored Growth Lending strategy typically includes the receipt of warrants and/or other equity from these venture-backed companies. RWAY’s Non-Sponsored Growth Lending strategy generally includes loans to late and growth stage, private companies that are funded directly by entrepreneurs and founders, or companies that no longer require institutional equity investment (which may selectively include publicly traded companies). RWAY refers to these target borrowers as “non-sponsored growth companies.” In addition to RWAY’s core strategy of providing Sponsored Growth Lending and Non-Sponsored Growth Lending, RWAY may also opportunistically participate in the secondary markets for investments that are consistent with RWAY’s broader investment strategy. RWAY seeks to construct a balanced portfolio with diversification among sponsored and non-sponsored transactions, diversification among sponsors within the Sponsored Growth Lending strategy, diversification among industry, geography, and stage of development, all contributing to a favorable risk adjusted return for the portfolio viewed as a whole. Borrowers tend to use the proceeds of RWAY’s financings to invest in sales and marketing, expand capacity of the overall business or refinance existing debt. SWK’s operations consist of its “Finance Receivables” business. SWK evaluates and invests in a broad range of healthcare related companies and products with innovative intellectual property, including the biotechnology, medical device, medical diagnostics and related tools, animal health and pharmaceutical industries (collectively, “life sciences”). SWK allocates capital within its finance receivables portfolio in order to generate income through the sales of life science products by third parties and related earned income sources. SWK’s Finance Receivables strategy is to be a leading healthcare capital provider by offering customized financing solutions to a broad range of life science companies, institutions and inventors. SWK’s Finance Receivables business is primarily focused on monetizing cash flow streams derived from commercial-stage products and related intellectual property through royalty purchases and financings, as well as through the creation of synthetic revenue interests in commercialized products. RWAY and SWK have similar risks given that both provide financing solutions and invest in debt. However, RWAY, as a significant portion of its investment strategy, is focused on providing senior secured loans to companies, while SWK does not generally act as a direct lender. Direct lending is particularly susceptible to a number of risks, such as failure to establish a substantial origination platform, breach of contractual loan agreements constituting default, credit downgrades, failure to complete proper due diligence of portfolio companies, decrease in the value of secured collateral, among other things. These risks are less amplified for SWK, whose portfolio includes senior and subordinated debt backed by royalties and synthetic royalties paid by companies in the life science sector, and purchased royalties generated by sales of life science products and related intellectual property. |
16
Table of Contents
|
|
SWK currently operates as an operating company and is structured in such a way that it is not deemed to be an “investment company” under the 1940 Act. Following the completion of the Mergers, the Combined Company will operate as a BDC. As a BDC, the Combined Company will be subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, which includes certain restrictions on the amount of leverage the Combined Company can utilize and limitations on who the Combined Company can transact with. Also, the Combined Company will operate as a regulated investment company (a “RIC”) under Subchapter M of the |
Q: |
|
How will the Combined Company be managed following the Mergers? |
A: |
|
Subject to applicable law, the directors of RWAY immediately prior to the Mergers will remain the directors of RWAY and will hold office until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify, or their earlier death or incapacity, resignation or removal. Following the Mergers, the Adviser will continue to be the investment adviser of RWAY. |
Q: |
|
Will the composition of the RWAY Board change following the Mergers? |
A: |
|
No. Following the Mergers and subject to applicable law, the directors of RWAY immediately prior to the Mergers will remain the directors of RWAY. |
Q: |
|
Are SWK Stockholders able to exercise appraisal rights? |
A: |
|
Yes. Subject to the closing of the First Merger, SWK Stockholders who do not vote in favor of the Merger Proposal and otherwise comply with the procedures and satisfy the conditions set forth in Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) are entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL. Failure to follow exactly the procedures specified under Section 262 of the DGCL will result in the loss of appraisal rights. Because of the complexity of the DGCL relating to appraisal rights, if you are considering exercising your appraisal rights, we encourage you to seek the advice of your own legal counsel. See the section entitled “The Mergers – Appraisal Rights” of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
Q: |
|
When do you expect to complete the Mergers? |
A: |
|
While there can be no assurance as to the exact timing, or that the Mergers will be completed at all, RWAY and SWK are working to complete the Mergers in the first quarter or early in the second quarter of 2026. It is currently expected that the Mergers will be completed promptly following receipt of the required stockholder approvals at the SWK Special Meeting and the satisfaction or waiver of the other closing conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement. |
Q: |
|
Are the Mergers expected to be taxable to SWK Stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes? |
A: |
|
Yes. The Mergers are expected to be a taxable event for SWK Stockholders. SWK Stockholders should read the section entitled “Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” for a more complete discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Mergers. SWK Stockholders should consult with their tax advisors to determine the tax consequences of the Mergers to them. |
Q: |
|
What happens if the Mergers are not consummated? |
A: |
|
If the Mergers are not completed for any reason, SWK Stockholders will not receive any consideration for their SWK Common Stock in connection with the Mergers. Instead, each of RWAY and SWK will remain a stand-alone company. |
17
Table of Contents
SUMMARY OF THE MERGERS
This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should carefully read this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including the other documents to which this proxy statement/ prospectus refers, for a more complete understanding of the Mergers. In particular, you should read the annexes attached to this proxy statement/prospectus, including the Merger Agreement, which is attached as Annex A hereto, as it is the legal document that governs the Mergers. See “Where You Can Find More Information.” For a discussion of the risk factors, you should carefully consider, see the section entitled “Risk Factors.”
The Parties to the Mergers
Runway Growth Finance Corp.
205 N. Michigan Ave.
Suite 4200
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 698-6902
RWAY is a non-diversified closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the 1940 Act. In addition, for tax purposes, RWAY has elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Code. RWAY is externally managed by the Adviser. RWAY Common Stock began to trade under the ticker “RWAY” on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on October 21, 2021.
RWAY’s investment objective is to maximize its total return to its stockholders primarily through current income on its loan portfolio and secondarily through capital gains on its warrants and other equity positions. RWAY typically invests in senior secured term loans and other senior debt obligations and may on occasion invest in second lien loans. RWAY generally receives warrants and/or other equity securities from portfolio companies in connection with its investments in loans to these companies. RWAY focuses on lending to late and growth stage companies in technology, healthcare, business services, financial services, and select consumer services and products in other high-growth industries. RWAY is typically the sole lender to its portfolio companies and does not actively syndicate the loans it originates to other lenders nor does it participate in syndications built by other lenders. RWAY originates its investments through two strategies: Sponsored Growth Lending and Non-Sponsored Growth Lending. In addition to its core strategy of providing Sponsored Growth Lending and Non-Sponsored Growth Lending, RWAY may also opportunistically participate in the secondary markets for investments that are consistent with its broader investment strategy. RWAY seeks to construct a balanced portfolio with diversification among sponsored and non-sponsored transactions, diversification among sponsors within the Sponsored Growth Lending strategy, diversification among industry, geography, and stage of development, all contributing to a favorable risk-adjusted return for the portfolio viewed as a whole. Borrowers tend to use the proceeds of RWAY’s financing to invest in sales and marketing, expand capacity of the overall business or refinance existing debt.
RWAY Portfolio Holding Corp.
205 N. Michigan Ave.
Suite 4200
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 698-6902
Intermediary Sub is a Delaware corporation and a newly incorporated wholly-owned subsidiary of RWAY. Intermediary Sub was formed in connection with, and for the sole purpose of, the Mergers.
RWAY Portfolio Corp.
205 N. Michigan Ave.
Suite 4200
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 698-6902
Acquisition Sub is a Delaware corporation and a newly incorporated wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediary Sub. Acquisition Sub was formed in connection with, and for the sole purpose of, the Mergers.
SWK Holdings Corporation
5956 Sherry Lane
Suite 650
Dallas, TX, 75225
(972) 687-7250
18
Table of Contents
SWK was incorporated in July 1996 in California and reincorporated in Delaware in September 1999. In July 2012, SWK commenced a strategy of building a specialty finance and asset management business. In August 2019, SWK commenced a complementary strategy of building a pharmaceutical development, manufacturing and intellectual property licensing business. Until recently, SWK’s operations were comprised of two reportable segments: “Finance Receivables” and “Pharmaceutical Development.” As a result of the sale and assignment of assets related to its contract manufacturing, formulation and development services business to AptarGroup, Inc., the Finance Receivables segment is the only remaining operating segment. SWK evaluates and invests in a broad range of healthcare related companies and products with innovative intellectual property, including the biotechnology, medical device, medical diagnostics and related tools, animal health and pharmaceutical industries (collectively, “life sciences”). SWK allocates capital within its finance receivables portfolio in order to generate income through the sales of life science products by third parties and related earned income sources.
SWK’s Finance Receivables strategy is to be a leading healthcare capital provider by offering customized financing solutions to a broad range of life science companies, institutions and inventors. SWK’s Finance Receivables business is primarily focused on monetizing cash flow streams derived from commercial-stage products and related intellectual property through royalty purchases and financings, as well as through the creation of synthetic revenue interests in commercialized products. In addition, through SWK’s wholly-owned subsidiary, SWK Advisors LLC, it is able to provide non-discretionary investment advisory services to institutional clients in separately managed accounts to similarly invest in life science finance. Unlike RWAY, SWK's investment objective and strategy are entirely focused on healthcare and life science related investments. RWAY's debt strategy is much more broad and involves investments across a number of sectors.
Runway Growth Capital LLC
205 N. Michigan Ave.
Suite 4200
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 698-6902
The Adviser was formed in 2015 to pursue an investment strategy focused on providing growth financing for dynamic, late and growth stage companies. David Spreng, Chief Executive Officer and President, formed the Adviser following a more than 25-year career in venture capital investing and lending. The Adviser has 26 employees across three offices in the United States, including twelve investment professionals focused on origination, underwriting, and managing its investment portfolio. The Adviser consistently demonstrates a credit first culture while maintaining, what the Adviser believes, is an admirable reputation among borrowers for industry knowledge, creativity, and understanding of the challenges often faced by late and growth stage companies.
In January 2025, the Adviser was acquired by certain private investment funds advised by BC Partners Credit and Mount Logan Capital Inc. pursuant to its minority investment. BC Partners Credit was launched in February 2017, with a focus on identifying attractive credit opportunities in any market environment, often in complex market segments. The platform leverages the broader firm’s deep industry and operating resources to provide flexible financing solutions to middle-market companies across Business Services, Industrials, Healthcare and other select sectors. Mount Logan Capital Inc. is an alternative asset management and insurance solutions company that is focused on public and private debt securities in the North American market and the reinsurance of annuity products, primarily through its wholly owned subsidiaries Mount Logan Management LLC and Ability Insurance Company, respectively. Mount Logan Capital Inc. also actively sources, evaluates, underwrites, manages, monitors and primarily invests in loans, debt securities, and other credit-oriented instruments that present attractive risk-adjusted returns and present low risk of principal impairment through the credit cycle.
The Adviser is registered as an investment adviser with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (together with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the “Advisers Act”). Subject to the overall supervision of the RWAY Board, the Adviser manages RWAY’s day-to-day operations and provides RWAY with investment advisory services pursuant to the third amended and restated investment advisory agreement, dated January 30, 2025 (the “RWAY Investment Advisory Agreement”).
Merger Structure
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, as of the Effective Time, SWK will merge with and into Acquisition Sub, with Acquisition Sub surviving the First Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediary Sub (i.e., the First Merger). Immediately following the occurrence of the Effective Time, Acquisition Sub will merge with and into Intermediary Sub (i.e., the Second Merger). Intermediary Sub will be the surviving company and continue its existence as a corporation under the laws of the state of Delaware, and the corporate existence of Acquisition Sub will cease to exist. Immediately following the Second Effective Time, Intermediary Sub will merge with and into RWAY (i.e., the Third Merger). RWAY will be the surviving company in the Third Merger and will continue its existence as a corporation under the laws of the state of Maryland. At such time, the separate existence of Intermediary Sub will cease.
19
Table of Contents
The Merger Agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus. RWAY and SWK encourage their respective stockholders to read the Merger Agreement carefully and in its entirety, as it is the legal document governing the Mergers.
Current Structure |
|
20
Table of Contents
First Merger |
|
21
Table of Contents
Second Merger |
|
22
Table of Contents
Third Merger |
|
23
Table of Contents
Post-Mergers |
|
Merger Consideration
At the Effective Time, each share of SWK Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, other than any shares of SWK Common Stock that are issued and outstanding and are owned by RWAY or any of its consolidated subsidiaries prior to the Effective Time or any treasury shares of SWK, which will be cancelled with no consideration exchanged therefor (the “Cancelled Shares”), will be converted, at the election of the respective SWK Stockholder, into the right to receive either (a) an amount of cash equal to the SWK Per Share NAV (as defined below) (such consideration, the “Per Share Cash Consideration”) or (b) a number of validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable shares of RWAY Common Stock equal to the quotient (rounded to four decimal places) of the SWK Per Share NAV divided by the RWAY Per Share NAV (as defined below) (the “Per Share Stock Consideration”), in each case of (a) and (b), subject to the applicable holder’s election for such share and the adjustments set forth in the Merger Agreement and describe below, plus (c) the quotient of $9,000,000 in cash (to be paid by the Adviser) (the "Guaranteed Cash Payment") divided by the numbers of shares of SWK Common Stock outstanding as of the Determination Date (excluding any Cancelled Shares) (the “Per Share Guaranteed Cash Payment”) (the Per Share Guaranteed Cash Payment, together with the Per Share Cash Consideration and the Per Share Stock Consideration, as applicable, the “Total Per Share Consideration”). See the section entitled “Description of the Merger Agreement – Letter of Election and Transmittal” for a more information on the election of the Per Share Cash Consideration and the Per Share Stock Consideration.
In connection with determining Closing SWK Net Asset Value (as defined below), SWK will present its good faith determination of the carrying value of the underlying portfolio assets of SWK as of 5:00 p.m. New York City time on the Determination Date (the value of each of such asset, the “SWK Marks”) to a valuation firm chosen by SWK (the “SWK Valuation Firm”). The SWK Valuation Firm will then determine in good faith a valuation range with respect to each underlying portfolio asset of SWK as of 5:00 p.m. New York City time on the Determination Date (each such range, an “Asset Valuation Range”). SWK will then calculate the “Adjudicated Portfolio Value,” in which each of the SWK Marks that are valued outside the Asset Valuation Range for such portfolio asset are deemed to be, (i) in the event the SWK Mark is higher than the highest value in the Asset Valuation Range for such asset, the highest value of such Asset Valuation Range and (ii) in the event the SWK Mark is lower than the lowest value in the Asset Valuation Range for such asset,
24
Table of Contents
the lowest value of such Asset Valuation Range; provided that, in the event the SWK Mark for a portfolio asset is within the Asset Valuation Range for such asset, the value of such asset is deemed to be the SWK Mark.
On the Determination Date, each of RWAY and SWK will deliver to the other a calculation of its estimated net asset value as of such date (such calculation with respect to SWK, the “Closing SWK Net Asset Value” and such calculation with respect to RWAY, the “Closing RWAY Net Asset Value”), in each case calculated in good faith and determined in accordance with the accounting and reporting guidance set forth in the United States generally accepted accounting principles’ (“GAAP”) Accounting Standards Certification topic 946 – Financial Services – Investment Companies. With respect to the Closing SWK Net Asset Value, such calculation will be determined in accordance with the determination of the Adjudicated Portfolio Value as set forth above and as more fully described in the Merger Agreement.
Based on such calculations, the parties will calculate: (1) the “SWK Per Share NAV,” which will be equal to (i) the Closing SWK Net Asset Value divided by (ii) the number of shares of SWK Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the Determination Date (other than Cancelled Shares) and (2) the “RWAY Per Share NAV,” which will be equal to (i) the Closing RWAY Net Asset Value divided by (ii) the number of shares of RWAY’s Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the Determination Date. The “Exchange Ratio” will be equal to the quotient (rounded to four decimal places) of (i) the SWK Per Share NAV divided by (ii) the RWAY Per Share NAV.
RWAY and SWK will update and redeliver the Closing RWAY Net Asset Value or the Closing SWK Net Asset Value, respectively, in the event that the closing of the Mergers is subsequently materially delayed or there is a material change to such calculation between the Determination Date and the closing of the Mergers and as needed to ensure that the calculation is determined within two (2) days (excluding Sundays and holidays) prior to the Effective Time.
Market Price of Securities
RWAY Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “RWAY.” SWK Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SWKH.”
The following table presents the most recently determined NAV per share of RWAY Common Stock and the most recently determined NAV per share of SWK Common Stock and the closing sales price as of the last trading day before execution of the Merger Agreement.
|
|
RWAY Common Stock |
|
SWK Common Stock |
||
NAV per Share as of September 30, 2025(1) |
|
$ |
13.55 |
|
$ |
21.02 |
Market Price per Share as of September 30, 2025 |
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
14.55 |
Closing Sales Price on October 8, 2025 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
14.45 |
Risks Relating to the Mergers
The Mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are subject to, among others, the following risks. RWAY Stockholders and SWK Stockholders should carefully consider these risks before deciding how to vote on the Merger Proposal to be voted on at the SWK Special Meeting.
25
Table of Contents
See the section entitled “Risk Factors – Risks Relating to the Mergers” for a more detailed discussion of these risks.
Treatment of Equity Awards
Treatment of SWK Restricted Stock Awards
Each award of restricted SWK Common Stock granted under SWK’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (“SWK Restricted Stock Award”) that is outstanding and unvested as of the Effective Time will vest in full immediately prior to the Effective Time and each share of SWK Common Stock subject to an outstanding SWK Restricted Stock Award shall be accelerated and cancelled in exchange for the right to receive the Total Per Share Consideration, subject to applicable withholding.
Interests of the Directors and Executive Officers of SWK in the Mergers
Certain of SWK’s directors and executive officers may have financial interests in the Mergers that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of the SWK Stockholders generally. The SWK Board was aware of these potential interests and considered them, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the Merger Agreement and in reaching its decision to approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger), and to recommend that the SWK Stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the First Merger. These interests include the following, among others:
26
Table of Contents
The interests of SWK’s directors and executive officers are described in more detail in the section entitled “The Mergers — Interests of the Directors and Executive Officers of SWK in the Mergers” of this proxy statement/prospectus.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Mergers
U.S. holders of SWK Common Stock will be treated as having sold their SWK Common Stock in a taxable sale and will generally recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the fair market value of the RWAY Common Stock and cash received (including such holder’s share of the Aggregate Cash Consideration) and the basis in his or her SWK Common Stock. This gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if, as of the effective date of the Mergers, the holding period for such shares of SWK Common Stock is greater than one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
Special Meeting of SWK Stockholders
SWK plans to hold the SWK Special Meeting virtually on March 31, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, at the following website meetnow.global/MAFJD7K. At the SWK Special Meeting, SWK Stockholders will be asked to approve the Merger Proposal, the Compensation Proposal, the Director Compensation Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal.
A SWK Stockholder can vote at the SWK Special Meeting if such stockholder owned shares of SWK Common Stock at the close of business on the SWK Record Date. As of that date, there were 12,095,906 shares of SWK Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote. Approximately 176,261 of such total outstanding shares, or approximately 1.46%, were owned beneficially or of record by directors and executive officers of SWK.
After careful consideration, the SWK Board unanimously approved the Merger Agreement, determined the Merger Agreement and the other transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) are advisable and unanimously recommends that SWK Stockholders vote “FOR” the Merger Proposal, Compensation Proposal, the Director Compensation Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal.
Vote Required — SWK
Each share of SWK Common Stock held by a holder of record as of the SWK Record Date (i.e., March 2, 2026) has one vote on each matter to be considered at the SWK Special Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
The Merger Proposal
The affirmative vote of the holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of outstanding shares of SWK Common Stock entitled to vote at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Merger Proposal.
Abstentions will be treated as present for quorum purposes and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Merger Proposal. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the shares of the SWK Common Stock will be voted “FOR” the Merger Proposal.
The Compensation Proposal
The affirmative vote of the holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of all votes properly cast at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Compensation Proposal.
Abstentions will have no effect on the voting outcome of the Compensation Proposal, although abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the shares of the SWK Common Stock will be voted “FOR” the Compensation Proposal.
The Director Compensation Proposal
The affirmative vote of the holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of all votes properly cast at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Director Compensation Proposal.
27
Table of Contents
Abstentions will have no effect on the voting outcome of the Director Compensation Proposal, although abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the shares of the SWK Common Stock will be voted "FOR" the Director Compensation Proposal.
The Adjournment Proposal
The affirmative vote of the holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of all the votes properly cast at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Adjournment Proposal.
Abstentions will have no effect on the voting outcome of the Adjournment Proposal, although abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the shares of the SWK Common Stock will be voted “FOR” the Adjournment Proposal.
Voting of Key Stockholder
As of the SWK Record Date, Double Black Diamond Offshore, Ltd. (as defined below) is entitled to vote approximately 8,493,088 shares of SWK Common Stock, or approximately 70.21% of total shares outstanding on that date.
RWAY, Double Black Diamond Offshore, Ltd. and Black Diamond Offshore, Ltd. have entered into the Key Stockholder Agreement (as defined below). See the section entitled “Description of Key Stockholder Agreement” for a description of this agreement.
Completion of the Mergers
As more fully described elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus and in the Merger Agreement, the completion of the Mergers depends on a number of conditions being satisfied or, where legally permissible, waived. For information on the conditions that must be satisfied or waived for the Mergers to occur, see the section entitled “Description of the Merger Agreement – Conditions to Closing the Mergers.” While there can be no assurance as to the exact timing, or that the Mergers will be completed at all, RWAY and SWK are working to complete the Mergers in the first quarter or early second quarter of 2026. It is currently expected that the Mergers will be completed promptly following receipt of the required stockholder approval at the SWK Special Meeting and the satisfaction or waiver of the other closing conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement.
Termination of the Merger
The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for RWAY and SWK, as discussed below in the section entitled “Description of the Merger Agreement – Termination of the Merger Agreement.”
Management of the Combined Company
Subject to applicable law, the directors of RWAY immediately prior to the Mergers will remain the directors of RWAY and will hold office until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify, or their earlier death or incapacity, resignation or removal. Following the Mergers, the Adviser will continue to be the investment adviser to RWAY.
Board Recommendation; Reasons for the Mergers
RWAY
The RWAY Board consulted with its legal and other advisors, as well as RWAY management, and considered numerous factors, and the RWAY Board unanimously determined that the Mergers are in the best interests of RWAY and the RWAY Stockholders.
The RWAY Board, with the assistance of their legal advisors, weighed various benefits and risks in considering the Mergers, both with respect to the immediate effects of the Mergers on RWAY and RWAY Stockholders and with respect to the potential benefits that could be experienced by the Combined Company after the Mergers. Some of the material factors considered by the RWAY Board in concluding that the Mergers are in the best interests of RWAY and RWAY Stockholders included, among others:
28
Table of Contents
Some of the material risks considered by the RWAY Board in concluding that the Mergers are in the best interests of RWAY and RWAY Stockholders included, among others:
For a further discussion of the material factors considered by the RWAY Board see the section entitled “The Mergers – Board Recommendation; Reasons for the Mergers – RWAY Reasons for the Mergers.”
SWK
The SWK Board consulted with its legal and other advisors, as well as SWK management, and considered numerous factors, and the SWK Board unanimously determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of SWK and SWK Stockholders.
The SWK Board, with the assistance of its legal and financial advisors, weighed various benefits and risks in considering the First Merger, both with respect to the immediate effects of the First Merger on SWK and SWK Stockholders and with respect to the potential benefits that could be experienced by the Combined Company after the First Merger. For the material factors (both positive and negative) considered by the SWK Board in concluding that the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) are in the best interests of SWK and SWK Stockholders, see the section entitled “The Mergers – SWK Board Recommendation; SWK Reasons for the Merger.”
The SWK Board has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger), determined the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) advisable and directed that such matters be submitted to SWK Stockholders for approval. After careful consideration the SWK Board unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger), determined the Merger Agreement and the other transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) are advisable and unanimously recommends that SWK Stockholders vote “FOR” each of the Proposals.
Stockholders Will Have Appraisal Rights
Subject to the closing of the First Merger, SWK Stockholders who do not vote in favor of the Merger Proposal and otherwise comply with the procedures and satisfy the conditions set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL are entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL. Failure to follow exactly the procedures specified under Section 262 of the DGCL will result in the loss of appraisal rights. See the section entitled “The Mergers — Appraisal Rights” of this proxy statement/prospectus.
29
Table of Contents
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information included in this document, SWK Stockholders should carefully consider the risks described below in determining whether to approve the Merger Proposal. The information in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part I of RWAY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 814-01180) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, and in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of RWAY's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 is incorporated herein by reference for general risks related to RWAY.
Since SWK's investment strategies are narrower than RWAY's, RWAY's risk profile is broader and its portfolio may be impacted by a greater number of market changes or events. RWAY is also subject to certain regulatory risks associated with being an investment company regulated under the 1940 Act. The information in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part I of SWK’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 001-39184) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of SWK’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-39184) for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of SWK’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-39184) for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 and in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of SWK’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-39184) for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 is incorporated herein by reference for general risks related to SWK. The occurrence of any of these risks could materially and adversely affect the business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow of RWAY and SWK and, following the Mergers, the Combined Company, and might cause you to lose all or part of your investment. The risks, as set out below and incorporated by reference herein, are not the only risks RWAY and SWK and, following the Mergers, the Combined Company, face, and there may be additional risks that RWAY and SWK do not presently know of or that they currently consider not likely to have a significant impact. New risks may emerge at any time, and RWAY and SWK cannot predict such risks or estimate the extent to which they may affect the business or financial performance of RWAY and SWK and, following the Mergers, the Combined Company. See the sections entitled “Incorporation by Reference for RWAY,” “Incorporation by Reference for SWK” and “Where You Can Find More Information” in this proxy statement/prospectus.
Risks Relating to the Mergers
Most RWAY Stockholders and SWK Stockholders will experience a reduction in percentage ownership and voting power in the Combined Company as a result of the Mergers.
RWAY Stockholders will experience a reduction in their percentage ownership interests and effective voting power in respect of the Combined Company relative to their percentage ownership interests in RWAY prior to the Mergers unless they hold a comparable or greater percentage ownership in SWK. Consequently, RWAY Stockholders should generally expect to exercise less influence over the management and policies of the Combined Company following the Mergers than they currently exercise over the management and policies of RWAY.
SWK Stockholders will experience a reduction in their percentage ownership interests and effective voting power in respect of the Combined Company relative to their percentage ownership interests in SWK prior to the Mergers unless they hold a comparable or greater percentage ownership in RWAY. Consequently, SWK Stockholders should generally expect to exercise less influence over the management and policies of the Combined Company following the Mergers than they currently exercise over the management and policies of SWK.
In addition, prior to completion of the Mergers, subject to certain restrictions in the Merger Agreement and certain restrictions under the 1940 Act for issuances at prices below the then-current NAV per share of RWAY Common Stock and SWK Common Stock, RWAY and SWK may issue additional shares of RWAY Common Stock and SWK Common Stock, respectively, which would further reduce the percentage ownership of the Combined Company to be held by current RWAY Stockholders and SWK Stockholders.
RWAY may be unable to realize the benefits anticipated by the Mergers, including estimated cost savings, or it may take longer than anticipated to achieve such benefits.
The realization of certain benefits anticipated as a result of the Mergers will depend in part on the integration of SWK’s investment portfolio with RWAY’s investment portfolio, and the integration of SWK’s business with RWAY’s business. Though the Adviser believes it can integrate RWAY and SWK given the significant overlap in their respective investment portfolios, operations and governance structure, there can be no assurance that SWK’s investment portfolio or business can be operated profitably or integrated successfully into RWAY’s operations in a timely fashion or at all. The dedication of management resources to such integration may detract attention from the day-to-day business of the Combined Company, and there can be no assurance that there will not be substantial
30
Table of Contents
costs associated with the transition process or there will not be other material adverse effects as a result of these integration efforts. Such effects, including incurring unexpected costs or delays in connection with such integration and failure of SWK’s investment portfolio to perform as expected, could have a material adverse effect on the financial results of the Combined Company.
RWAY also expects to achieve certain synergies and cost savings from the Mergers when the two companies have fully integrated their portfolios. It is possible that the estimates of these synergies and potential cost savings could ultimately be incorrect. The cost savings estimates also assume that RWAY will be able to combine its operations and SWK’s operations in a manner that permits those cost savings to be fully realized. If the estimates turn out to be incorrect, or if RWAY is not able to successfully combine SWK’s investment portfolio or business with its operations, the anticipated synergies and cost savings may not be fully realized (or realized at all) or may take longer to realize than expected.
The announcement and pendency of the Mergers could adversely affect both RWAY’s and SWK’s businesses, financial results and operations.
The announcement and pendency of the Mergers could cause disruptions in, and create uncertainty surrounding, both RWAY’s and SWK’s businesses, including affecting relationships with existing and future borrowers, which could have a significant negative impact on future revenues and results of operations, regardless of whether the Mergers are completed. In addition, RWAY and SWK have diverted, and will continue to divert, management resources towards the completion of the Mergers, which could have a negative impact on their future revenues and results of operations.
RWAY and SWK are also subject to the restrictions on the conduct of each of their businesses prior to the completion of the Mergers set forth in the Merger Agreement. Generally, these restrictions will require RWAY and SWK to conduct their businesses only in the ordinary course and subject to specific limitations, including, among other things, certain restrictions on their ability to make certain investments and acquisitions, sell, transfer or dispose of their assets, amend their organizational documents and enter into or modify certain material contracts. These restrictions could prevent RWAY or SWK from pursuing otherwise attractive business opportunities, industry developments and future opportunities and may otherwise have a significant negative impact on their future investment income and results of operations.
If the Mergers do not close, SWK will not benefit from the expenses they have incurred in pursuit of the Mergers.
The Mergers may not be completed. If the Mergers are not completed, SWK will have incurred substantial expenses for which no ultimate benefit will have been received. SWK has incurred out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the Mergers for investment banking, legal and accounting fees and financial printing and other related charges, much of which will be incurred even if the Mergers are not completed. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, such expenses incurred in connection with the Mergers will be taken into account in the calculation of the Closing SWK Net Asset Value.
The termination of the Merger Agreement could negatively impact SWK.
If the Merger Agreement is terminated, there may be various consequences, including:
The Merger Agreement limits the ability of SWK to pursue alternatives to the Mergers.
The Merger Agreement includes restrictions on the ability of SWK to solicit proposals for alternative transactions or engage in discussions regarding such proposals, subject to exceptions and termination provisions (as more fully described in the section entitled “Description of the Merger Agreement – Other Covenants”), which could have the effect of discouraging such proposals from being made or pursued.
31
Table of Contents
The Mergers are subject to closing conditions, including approval by SWK Stockholders, that, if not satisfied or (to the extent legally allowed) waived, will result in the Mergers not being completed, which may result in material adverse consequences to the business and operations of RWAY and SWK.
The Mergers are subject to closing conditions, including approval of SWK Stockholders that, if not satisfied or (to the extent legally allowed) waived, will prevent the Mergers from being completed. The closing condition that SWK Stockholders approve the Merger Proposal may not be waived under applicable law and must be satisfied for the Mergers to be completed. If SWK Stockholders do not approve the Merger Proposal and the Mergers are not completed, the resulting failure of the Mergers could have a material adverse impact on SWK’s businesses and operations. Likewise, if SWK Stockholders do not approve the Merger Proposal and the Mergers are not completed, the resulting failure of the Mergers could have a material adverse impact on RWAY’s businesses and operations. In addition to the required approvals of SWK Stockholders, the Mergers are subject to a number of other conditions beyond the control of RWAY and SWK that may prevent, delay or otherwise materially adversely affect completion of the Mergers. RWAY and SWK cannot predict whether and when these other conditions will be satisfied. The failure to complete the Mergers would result in RWAY and SWK, and RWAY Stockholders and SWK Stockholders, failing to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers described in the section entitled “The Mergers – Board Recommendation; Reasons for the Mergers – SWK Reasons for the Mergers.”
RWAY and SWK may, to the extent legally allowed, waive one or more conditions to the Mergers without resoliciting stockholder approval.
Certain conditions to RWAY’s and SWK’s respective obligations to complete the Mergers may be waived, in whole or in part, to the extent legally allowed, either unilaterally or by mutual agreement. In the event that any such waiver does not require resolicitation of stockholders, RWAY and SWK will each have the discretion to complete the Mergers without seeking further stockholder approval. The conditions requiring the approval of SWK Stockholders, however, cannot be waived.
RWAY and SWK will be subject to operational uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the Mergers are pending.
Uncertainty about the effect of the Mergers may have an adverse effect on RWAY or SWK and, consequently, on the Combined Company following completion of the Mergers. These uncertainties may cause those that deal with RWAY or SWK to seek to change their existing business relationships with them. In addition, the Merger Agreement restricts RWAY and SWK from taking actions that each might otherwise consider to be in its best interest. These restrictions may prevent RWAY or SWK from pursuing certain business operations that may arise prior to the completion of the Mergers.
Litigation filed against RWAY or SWK in connection with the Mergers could result in substantial costs and could delay or prevent the Mergers from being completed.
From time to time, RWAY and SWK may be subject to legal actions, including securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits, as well as various regulatory, governmental and law enforcement inquiries, investigations and subpoenas in connection with the Mergers. These or any similar securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits, regardless of their merits, may result in substantial costs and divert management time and resources. An adverse judgment in such cases could have a negative impact on the liquidity and financial condition of RWAY, SWK or the Combined Company following the Mergers or could prevent the Mergers from being completed.
The Mergers may trigger certain “change of control” provisions and other restrictions in contracts of RWAY and SWK or their affiliates, and the failure to obtain any required consents or waivers could adversely impact the Combined Company.
Certain agreements of RWAY, SWK or their respective affiliates may require by their terms the consent or waiver of one or more counterparties in connection with the Mergers. The failure to obtain any such consent or waiver may permit such counterparties to terminate, or otherwise increase their rights or RWAY’s and SWK’s obligations under, any such agreement because the Mergers or other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement may violate an anti-assignment, change of control or similar provision relating to any of such transactions. If this occurs, RWAY may have to seek to replace that agreement with a new agreement or seek an amendment to such agreement. RWAY and SWK cannot assure you that RWAY will be able to replace or amend any such agreement on comparable terms or at all.
If any such agreement is material, the failure to obtain consents, amendments or waivers under, or to replace on similar terms or at all, any of these agreements could adversely affect the financial performance or results of operations of the Combined Company following the Mergers, including preventing RWAY from operating a material part of SWK’s business.
32
Table of Contents
In addition, the consummation of the Mergers may violate, conflict with, result in a breach of provisions of, or the loss of any benefit under, constitute a default (or an event that, with or without notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute a default) under, or result in the termination, cancellation, acceleration or other change of any right or obligation (including any payment obligation) under, certain agreements of RWAY and SWK. Any such violation, conflict, breach, loss, default or other effect could, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, assets or business of the Combined Company following completion of the Mergers.
The shares of RWAY Common Stock to be received by SWK Stockholders as a result of the Mergers will have different rights associated with them than the shares of SWK Common Stock currently held by them.
The rights associated with SWK Common Stock are different from the rights associated with RWAY Common Stock. See the section entitled “Comparison of RWAY and SWK Stockholder Rights.”
RWAY has operated and continues to operate so as to maintain its election to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. If RWAY meets source of income, quarterly asset diversification, and distribution requirements, it generally will not be subject to corporate-level income taxation on income it timely distributes, or is deemed to distribute, to its stockholders as distributions. RWAY would cease to qualify for such tax treatment if it were unable to comply with these requirements. In addition, RWAY may have difficulty meeting the requirement to make distributions to RWAY’s stockholders because in certain cases RWAY may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income. If RWAY fails to qualify as a RIC, it will have to pay corporate-level taxes on all of its income whether or not it distributes it, which would substantially reduce the amount of income available for debt service as well as reduce and/or affect the character and amount of its distributions to RWAY’s Stockholders.
SWK Stockholders may receive a form or combination of consideration different from what they elect.
Each holder of SWK Common Stock is entitled to make an election (an “Election”) to receive, with respect to all or any portion of such shares held by such holder, the Per Share Cash Consideration. With respect to each share held by a record holder of shares of SWK Common Stock with respect to which such holder does not make an Election, such holder will receive the Per Share Stock Consideration; provided, that with respect to any record holder of shares of SWK Common Stock who at the record date who does not make an Election with respect to any shares held by such holder (such holder, a “Non-Election Holder”), such holder will have been deemed to have made an Election with respect to a percentage of the total shares of SWK Common Stock held by such Non-Election Holder equal to a number, the numerator of which will be the Aggregate Cash Consideration (as defined and calculated in accordance with the Merger Agreement), and the denominator of which will be the Closing SWK Net Asset Value.
If, after giving effect to the Elections, the aggregate number of shares of RWAY Common Stock to be issued by RWAY in the First Merger (the “Proposed Aggregate Stock Issuance Amount”) exceeds the Total Stock Consideration (as defined and calculated in accordance with the Merger Agreement), then the number of non-electing shares will be reduced (without any action on the part of any holder of SWK Common Stock) by converting non-electing shares into electing shares until the Proposed Aggregate Stock Issuance Amount is equal to the Total Stock Consideration (determined on a whole-share basis). Any such reduction in the number of non-electing shares shall be applied among all stockholders, pro rata based on the aggregate number of non-electing shares held by each such stockholder in proportion to the total number of non-electing shares.
If, after giving effect to the Elections, the aggregate amount of cash (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, cash in lieu of fractional shares) to be issued by RWAY in the First Merger (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, the Guaranteed Cash Payment (the “Proposed Cash Consideration”)) exceeds the Aggregate Cash Consideration, then the number of electing shares shall be reduced (without any action on the part of any holder of SWK Common Stock) by converting electing shares into non-electing shares until the Proposed Cash Consideration is equal to the Aggregate Cash Consideration (determined on a whole-share basis). Any such reduction in the number of electing shares shall be applied among all stockholders, pro rata based on the aggregate number of electing shares held by each such stockholder in proportion to the total number of electing shares.
The market price of RWAY Common Stock will continue to fluctuate after the Mergers.
Upon completion of the Mergers and subject to such SWK Stockholder’s election, SWK Stockholders will become holders of RWAY Common Stock. The market price of the common stock of the Combined Company may continue to fluctuate, potentially significantly, following completion of the Mergers, including for the reasons described above. As a result, former SWK Stockholders could lose some or all of the value of their investment in RWAY Common Stock. In addition, any significant price or volume fluctuations in the stock market generally could have a material adverse effect on the market for, or liquidity of, the RWAY Common Stock received in the Mergers, regardless of the Combined Company’s actual operating performance.
33
Table of Contents
COMPARATIVE FEES AND EXPENSES
The following table is intended to assist SWK Stockholders in understanding the costs and expenses that an investor in shares of RWAY Common Stock or SWK Common Stock bears directly or indirectly and, based on the assumptions set forth below, the pro forma costs and expenses estimated to be incurred by the Combined Company in the first year following completion of the Mergers. We caution you that some of the percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary. Except where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this document contains a reference to fees or expenses paid or to be paid by “you,” “RWAY” or “SWK,” stockholders will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in RWAY or SWK, as applicable. The table below is based on information as of September 30, 2025 for each party (except as noted below), annualized for a full year, and includes expenses of the applicable consolidated subsidiaries.
|
|
Actual |
|
Pro Forma |
||||||
|
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
RWAY |
||||
Stockholder transaction expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price) |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
(1) |
Offering expenses (as a percentage of offering price) |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
(2) |
Dividend reinvestment plan expenses |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
(3) |
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of offering price) |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock)*: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Fee payable under the RWAY Investment Advisory Agreement |
|
3.11 |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
3.42 |
% |
(4) |
Incentive Fee payable under the RWAY Investment Advisory Agreement |
|
2.59 |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
2.83 |
% |
(5) |
Interest payments and fees paid on borrowed funds |
|
8.69 |
% |
|
1.78 |
% |
|
9.14 |
% |
(6) |
Other expenses |
|
1.68 |
% |
|
8.57 |
% |
|
1.59 |
% |
(7) |
Total annual expenses |
|
16.07 |
% |
|
10.35 |
% |
|
16.98 |
% |
|
* These percentages are expressed as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock. As a result, the ratios will appear higher for a highly leveraged entity. Therefore, we are also providing each percentage expressed as a percentage of gross assets as of September 30, 2025 in the respective footnote. Total annual expenses expressed as a percentage of gross assets are 8.11% for RWAY, 9.14% for SWK, and 7.74% for the Combined Company on a pro forma basis.
The pro forma base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 1.50% of the gross assets of the Combined Company, assumed to be a combined amount of RWAY’s actual gross assets as of September 30, 2025 and the resulting additional SWK gross assets to be integrated into RWAY as a result of the Mergers. SWK’s Gross Assets included a fair value adjustment to SWK’s investment as of September 30, 2025 to align to Accounting Standards Certification Topic 946 – Financial Services – Investment Companies (“ASC 946”). The fair value adjustment is based on a preliminary valuation estimate prepared by independent third party valuation specialists as of September 30, 2025. This same ratio is 1.56% when expressed as a percentage of the Combined Company's gross assets as of September 30, 2025.
Under the Income Incentive Fee, RWAY pays the Adviser an incentive fee with respect to RWAY’s NII prior to calculating the incentive fee (“Pre-Incentive Fee NII”). Pre-Incentive Fee NII, expressed as a rate of return on the value of RWAY’s net assets at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter, will be compared to a “hurdle rate” of 2.0% per quarter (8.0% annualized). RWAY pays the Adviser an Income Incentive Fee with respect to RWAY’s Pre-Incentive Fee NII in each calendar quarter as follows: (i) no Income Incentive Fee in any calendar quarter in which our Pre-Incentive Fee NII does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2.0%; (ii) 80% of
34
Table of Contents
our Pre-Incentive Fee NII with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee NII, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 2.667% in any calendar quarter (10.668% annualized) (the portion of our Pre-Incentive Fee NII that exceeds the hurdle but is less than 2.667% is referred to as the “catch-up”; the “catch-up” is meant to provide the Adviser with 20.0% of our Pre-Incentive Fee NII as if a hurdle did not apply if our Pre-Incentive Fee NII exceeds 2.667% in any calendar quarter (10.668% annualized)); and (iii) 20.0% of the amount of our Pre-Incentive Fee NII, if any, that exceeds 2.667% in any calendar quarter (10.668% annualized) payable to the Adviser (once the hurdle is reached and the catch-up is achieved, 20.0% of all Pre-Incentive Fee NII thereafter is allocated to the Adviser). The incentive fee referenced in the “Actual” column is based on annualized amounts of the Income Incentive Fee on Pre-Incentive Fee NII incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2025, adjusted for the non-recurring income related to prepayments. RWAY experienced higher levels of prepayments during the three months ended September 30, 2025, which does not accurately reflect the incentive fees on a go-forward basis. Accordingly, the adjustment was made to more appropriately reflect expected incentive fees on a go-forward basis. This same ratio is 1.31% when expressed as a percentage of RWAY's gross assets as of September 30, 2025.
The pro forma incentive fee has been calculated in accordance with the terms of the RWAY Investment Advisory Agreement as described above. The “Pro Forma” column incorporates SWK’s estimated incentive fee based on income earned for the three months ended September 30, 2025. This same ratio is 1.29% when expressed as a percentage of the Combined Company's gross assets as of September 30, 2025.
Under the Capital Gains Fee, RWAY pays the Adviser, as of the end of each calendar year, 20.0% of RWAY’s aggregate cumulative realized capital gains, if any, from the date of our election to be regulated as a BDC through the end of that calendar year, computed net of our aggregate cumulative realized capital losses and aggregate cumulative unrealized capital depreciation through the end of such year, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid Capital Gains Fee. For the foregoing purpose, the RWAY’s “aggregate cumulative realized capital gains” will not include any unrealized gains. If such amount is negative, then no Capital Gains Fee will be payable for such year. The figures above for both “Actual” and “Pro Forma” columns do not include a Capital Gains Fee.
For SWK, “Interest payments and fees on borrowed funds” is computed by annualizing the interest and financings cost for the three months ended September 30, 2025 to more accurately reflect the expense on a go-forward basis as compared against the actual amounts incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2025. This same ratio is 1.57% when expressed as a percentage of SWK's gross assets as of September 30, 2025.
The pro forma “Interest payments and fees on borrowed funds” represents an estimate of RWAY’s annualized interest expense based on outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement, the 2026 Notes, the 2027 Notes, and the 2028 Notes. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement reflect the outstanding balance as of September 30, 2025, and assume an incremental drawdown of approximately $206.1 million on September 30, 2025, utilizing the applicable interest rates and unused fees in effect as of that date. The incremental borrowings are assumed to fund the cash portion of the purchase price, related transaction expenses, and the prepayment of SWK’s unsecured notes. In addition, the estimate assumes the repayment at maturity of the April 2026 Notes in the principal amount of $25.0 million, bearing an interest rate of 8.54%, and the simultaneous drawdown under the Credit Agreement in order to repay the April 2026 Notes. The pro forma “Interest payments and fees on borrowed funds” ratio is 4.17% when expressed as a percentage of the Combined Company's gross assets as of September 30, 2025.
For SWK, “Other expenses” largely includes general and administrative expenses, which consists primarily of compensation, legal and professional expenses, income tax expenses, and corporate governance expenses. The percentage reflected in the “Actual” column reflects actual amounts incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2025, on an annualized basis. This same ratio is 7.56% when expressed as a percentage of SWK's gross assets as of September 30, 2025.
The pro forma column assumes the sum of amounts estimated for RWAY above and an estimate of incremental expenses expected to be incurred as a result of the increase in the combined entity asset size following the Mergers, while also accounting for efficiencies and a reduction to overall income tax expense, as described below. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, RWAY qualifies as an investment company and has elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Conversely, SWK operates as a taxable C corporation subject to U.S. federal and state corporate income taxes. As such, SWK’s tax expense incurred in 2025 is not indicative of taxes expected to be incurred on a go-forward basis following the completion of the Mergers. For reference, RWAY’s tax expense as a percentage of total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024, was approximately 0.48%, while SWK’s was approximately 24%. “Other expenses” on a pro forma basis when expressed as a percentage of the Combined Company's gross assets as of September 30, 2025 are 0.72%.
35
Table of Contents
Example
The following example demonstrates the projected dollar amount of total cumulative expenses over various periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in RWAY, SWK or the Combined Company’s common shares following completion of the Mergers on a pro forma basis. In calculating the following expense amounts, each of RWAY and SWK has assumed that it would have no additional leverage and that its annual operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the tables above. Calculations for the pro forma Combined Company following the Mergers assume that the Mergers closed on September 30, 2025, and that the leverage and operating expenses of RWAY and SWK remain at the levels set forth in the tables above. Estimated transaction expenses related to the Mergers are not included in the following example.
|
|
|
|
|
1 year |
|
3 years |
|
5 years |
|
10 years |
||||
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
RWAY, assuming a 5% annual return (assumes no return from net realized capital gains or net unrealized capital appreciation) |
|
$ |
135 |
|
$ |
371 |
|
$ |
569 |
|
$ |
934 |
|||
SWK, assuming a 5% annual return (assumes no return from net realized capital gains or net unrealized capital appreciation) |
|
$ |
104 |
|
$ |
294 |
|
$ |
465 |
|
$ |
818 |
|||
RWAY, assuming a 5% annual return (assumes return entirely from realized capital gains and thus subject to the capital gain incentive fee) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
$ |
395 |
|
$ |
599 |
|
$ |
963 |
|||
SWK, assuming a 5% annual return (assumes return entirely from realized capital gains and thus subject to the capital gain incentive fee) |
|
$ |
104 |
|
$ |
294 |
|
$ |
465 |
|
$ |
818 |
|||
Pro forma Combined Company following the Mergers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Assuming a 5% annual return (assumes no return from net realized capital gains or net unrealized capital appreciation) |
|
$ |
142 |
|
$ |
387 |
|
$ |
589 |
|
$ |
954 |
|||
Assuming a 5% annual return (assumes return entirely from realized capital gains and thus subject to the capital gain incentive fee) |
|
$ |
152 |
|
$ |
410 |
|
$ |
619 |
|
$ |
981 |
|||
While the example assumes a 5% annual return, as required by the SEC, performance of RWAY, SWK and the Combined Company will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5%. The incentive fee under the RWAY Investment Advisory Agreement, which, assuming a 5% annual return, would either not be payable or have an immaterial impact on the expense amounts shown above in the example where there is no return from net realized capital gains, and therefore is not reflected in such calculations. Under the RWAY Investment Advisory Agreement, no incentive fee would be payable if RWAY or the Combined Company, as applicable, has a 5% annual return with no capital gains, however, there would be incentive fees payable in the examples where the entire return is derived from realized capital gains. If sufficient returns are achieved on investments, including through the realization of capital gains, to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, returns to investors and expenses would be higher. The example assumes that all dividends and other distributions are reinvested at NAV. Under certain circumstances, reinvestment of dividends and other distributions under the distribution reinvestment plan may occur at a price per share that differs from NAV.
The example and the expenses in the table above should not be considered a representation of RWAY’s or SWK’s or, following the completion of the Mergers, the Combined Company’s, future expenses, and actual expenses may be greater or less than those shown.
36
Table of Contents
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement/prospectus, including the documents incorporated by reference herein, contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to RWAY, SWK or, following the Mergers, the Combined Company, regarding future events or the future performance or future financial condition of RWAY, SWK or, following the Mergers, the Combined Company. The forward-looking statements may include statements as to: future operating results of RWAY, SWK or, following the Mergers, the Combined Company, and NII projections; business prospects of RWAY, SWK or, following the Mergers, the Combined Company, and the prospects of their portfolio companies; and the impact of the investments that RWAY, SWK or, following the Mergers, the Combined Company expect to make. Certain factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected, including the uncertainties associated with:
In addition, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “seek,” “plan,” “should,” “estimate,” “project” and “intend” indicate forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. The forward-looking statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus involve risks and uncertainties. The actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part I of RWAY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 814-01180) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, and in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 for RWAY and in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part I of SWK’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 001-39184) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of SWK’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-39184) for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of SWK’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-39184) for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 and in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of SWK’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no.
37
Table of Contents
001-39184) for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 for SWK, as such factors may be updated from time to time in their periodic filings with the SEC, and elsewhere contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus.
Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include:
RWAY and SWK have based the forward-looking statements included in this proxy statement/prospectus on information available to them on the date of this presentation, and they assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, for which the safe harbor provided in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act is not available. Although RWAY and SWK undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that they may make directly to you or through reports that RWAY and SWK in the future may file with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.
38
Table of Contents
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth (1) RWAY’s and SWK’s actual capitalization as of September 30, 2025 and (2) RWAY’s pro forma capitalization as adjusted to reflect the effects of the Mergers. You should read this table together with RWAY’s and SWK’s consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference herein.
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2025 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
(unaudited, dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share data) |
|||||||||
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|||||
|
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
Pro Forma Adjustments(1) |
|
RWAY |
||||
|
|
(acquiring company) |
|
(target company) |
|
|
|
(Combined Company) |
||||
Net assets |
|
|
489,526 |
|
|
254,206 |
|
|
(187,175) |
|
|
556,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares of common stock outstanding |
|
|
36,134,037 |
|
|
12,095,906 |
|
|
(6,444,535) |
(3) |
|
41,785,408 |
NAV per common share |
|
$ |
13.55 |
|
$ |
21.02 |
(2) |
|
|
|
$ |
13.32 |
39
Table of Contents
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements and explanatory notes illustrate the effect of the Mergers on RWAY’s financial position and results of operations based upon RWAY’s and SWK’s respective actual financial positions and results of operations under the asset acquisition method of accounting.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X as amended by the SEC Final Rule Release No. 33-10786, Amendments to Financial Disclosures About Acquired and Disposed Businesses. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are derived from and should be read in conjunction with:
The unaudited pro forma financial statements consists of (i) an unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of September 30, 2025 assuming the Mergers had been completed on September 30, 2025, and (ii) Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of Operations unaudited for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and audited for the year ended December 31, 2024 assuming the Mergers had been completed on January 1, 2024.
The unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities gives effect to that acquisition as if it had been consummated on September 30, 2025 and includes pro forma adjustments based on the preliminary valuation of certain tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and consideration transferred. The unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities combines the RWAY’s unaudited Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of September 30, 2025 with SWK’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2025.
The unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 gives effect to the acquisition as if it had been consummated on January 1, 2024 and combines RWAY’s audited consolidated results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 with SWK’s audited consolidated results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024. Similarly, the unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 gives effect to the acquisition as if it had been consummated on January 1, 2024 and combines RWAY’s unaudited consolidated results for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 with SWK’s unaudited consolidated results for the nine months ended September 30, 2025.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are for illustrative purposes only and are subject to a number of uncertainties and assumptions as described in the accompanying notes. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements should not be relied upon as an indication of the financial condition or the operating results that RWAY would have achieved had the acquisition occurred on the dates assumed, nor indicative of the financial condition or operating results of the merged company as of or for any future date or period. In addition, as explained in more detail in the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements, the allocation of the pro forma purchase price reflected in the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements involves estimates, is subject to adjustment and may vary significantly from the actual purchase price allocation that will be recorded upon completion of the Mergers.
40
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
As of September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
Actual |
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|||
|
|
RWAY |
|
SWK As Reclassified |
|
Transaction Adjustments |
|
Other Transaction Accounting Adjustments |
|
Financing Adjustments |
|
RWAY |
||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/non-affiliate investments at fair value |
|
$ |
931,915 |
|
$ |
253,270 |
|
$ |
10,213 |
(4a) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1,195,398 |
Affiliate investments at fair value |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Control investments at fair value |
|
|
14,049 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
14,049 |
Total investments at fair value |
|
|
945,964 |
|
|
253,270 |
|
|
10,213 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,209,447 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7,917 |
|
|
10,206 |
|
|
(172,510) |
(4b) |
|
(3,792) |
(5a) |
|
172,510 |
(6a) |
|
14,331 |
Interest and fees receivable |
|
|
8,038 |
|
|
5,581 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
13,619 |
Other assets |
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
20,305 |
|
|
(19,677) |
(4c) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,055 |
Total assets |
|
|
963,346 |
|
|
289,362 |
|
|
(181,974) |
|
|
(3,792) |
|
|
172,510 |
|
|
1,239,452 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility |
|
|
186,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
172,510 |
(6a) |
|
358,510 |
2026 Notes |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
25,000 |
2027 Notes |
|
|
132,250 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
132,250 |
2028 Notes |
|
|
107,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
107,000 |
SWK Notes, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
31,921 |
|
|
1,536 |
(4d) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
33,457 |
Unamortized deferred financing costs |
|
|
(6,744) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(6,744) |
Total debt, less unamortized deferred financing costs |
|
|
443,506 |
|
|
31,921 |
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
- |
|
|
172,510 |
|
|
649,473 |
Incentive fees payable |
|
|
16,295 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
16,295 |
Interest payable |
|
|
9,990 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
9,990 |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
640 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
640 |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
3,389 |
|
|
3,235 |
|
|
3,665 |
(4e) |
|
(3,792) |
(5a) |
|
- |
|
|
6,497 |
Total liabilities |
|
|
473,820 |
|
|
35,156 |
|
|
5,201 |
|
|
(3,792) |
|
|
172,510 |
|
|
682,895 |
Net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value |
|
|
361 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
45 |
(4f) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
418 |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
545,504 |
|
|
4,417,730 |
|
|
(4,358,207) |
(4f) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
605,027 |
Accumulated undistributed (overdistributed) earnings |
|
|
(56,339) |
|
|
(4,163,536) |
|
|
4,170,987 |
(4f) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(48,888) |
Total net assets |
|
$ |
489,526 |
|
$ |
254,206 |
|
$ |
(187,175) |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
556,557 |
See notes to pro forma consolidated financial statements.
41
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
Actual |
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|||
|
|
RWAY |
|
SWK As Reclassified |
|
Transaction Adjustments |
|
Other Transaction Accounting Adjustments (Note 5) |
|
Financing Adjustments |
|
Asset Sale Adjustments |
|
RWAY |
|||||||
Investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From non-control/non-affiliate investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
91,314 |
|
$ |
30,077 |
|
$ |
1,316 |
(4g) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(2,543) |
(7a) |
$ |
120,164 |
Payment-in-kind interest income |
|
|
11,857 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
11,857 |
Dividend income |
|
|
758 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
758 |
Fee income |
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,946 |
From affiliate investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
646 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
646 |
Fee income |
|
|
256 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
256 |
Other income |
|
|
515 |
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(2,269) |
(7a) |
|
935 |
Total investment income |
|
|
107,292 |
|
|
32,766 |
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(4,812) |
|
|
136,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees |
|
|
11,916 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,144 |
(4h) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
15,060 |
Incentive fees |
|
|
11,527 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,251 |
(4i) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
13,778 |
Interest and other debt financing expenses |
|
|
32,681 |
|
|
3,464 |
|
|
(852) |
(4j) |
|
(368) |
(5c) |
|
7,814 |
(6b) |
|
- |
|
|
42,739 |
Professional fees |
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,687 |
Administration agreement expenses |
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,993 |
Insurance expense |
|
|
479 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
479 |
Tax expense |
|
|
810 |
|
|
4,220 |
|
|
(4,220) |
(4k) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
810 |
Other expenses |
|
|
916 |
|
|
9,884 |
|
|
1,748 |
(4l) |
|
(3,072) |
(5b) |
|
- |
|
|
(3,122) |
(7a) |
|
6,354 |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
62,009 |
|
|
17,568 |
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
(3,440) |
|
|
7,814 |
|
|
(3,122) |
|
|
82,900 |
Net investment income |
|
|
45,283 |
|
|
15,198 |
|
|
(755) |
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
(7,814) |
|
|
(1,690) |
|
|
53,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and net change in unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/non-affiliate investments |
|
|
(5,705) |
|
|
(479) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(996) |
(7a) |
|
(7,180) |
Affiliate investments |
|
|
8,943 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
8,943 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
3,238 |
|
|
(479) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(996) |
|
|
1,763 |
Net realized gain (loss) on forward contracts and foreign currency transactions |
|
|
(23) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(23) |
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
|
3,215 |
|
|
(479) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(996) |
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized gain (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/non-affiliate investments |
|
|
(11,677) |
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
4,379 |
(4m) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(5,049) |
Affiliate investments |
|
|
(9,925) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(9,925) |
Control investments |
|
|
426 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
426 |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
(21,176) |
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(14,548) |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts and foreign currency transactions |
|
|
(640) |
|
|
(113) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(753) |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
(21,816) |
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(15,301) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
(18,601) |
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(996) |
|
|
(13,561) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
|
$ |
26,682 |
|
$ |
16,855 |
|
$ |
3,624 |
|
$ |
3,440 |
|
$ |
(7,814) |
|
$ |
(2,686) |
|
$ |
40,101 |
Net investment income per common share (basic and diluted) |
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per common share (basic and diluted) |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic and diluted) |
|
|
36,887,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,539,339 |
See notes to pro forma consolidated financial statements.
42
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
Actual |
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|||
|
|
RWAY |
|
SWK As Reclassified |
|
Transaction Adjustments |
|
Other Transaction Accounting Adjustments (Note 5) |
|
Financing Adjustments |
|
Asset Sale Adjustments |
|
RWAY |
|||||||
Investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From non-control/non-affiliate investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
127,045 |
|
$ |
40,787 |
|
$ |
1,755 |
(4g) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(8,855) |
(7a) |
$ |
160,732 |
Payment-in-kind interest income |
|
|
12,088 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
12,088 |
Dividend income |
|
|
318 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
318 |
Fee income |
|
|
2,231 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,231 |
From affiliate investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,419 |
Other income |
|
|
531 |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(3,647) |
(7a) |
|
1,084 |
Total investment income |
|
|
144,632 |
|
|
44,987 |
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(12,502) |
|
|
178,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees |
|
|
15,694 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,192 |
(4h) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
19,886 |
Incentive fees |
|
|
14,579 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,720 |
(4i) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
17,299 |
Interest and other debt financing expenses |
|
|
44,226 |
|
|
4,685 |
|
|
(1,054) |
(4j) |
|
(657) |
(5c) |
|
11,822 |
(6b) |
|
- |
|
|
59,022 |
Professional fees |
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,199 |
Administration agreement expenses |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,986 |
Insurance expense |
|
|
829 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
829 |
Tax expense |
|
|
392 |
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
(4,884) |
(4k) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
392 |
Other expenses |
|
|
976 |
|
|
28,716 |
|
|
(12,606) |
(4l) |
|
(978) |
(5b) |
|
- |
|
|
(7,365) |
(7a) |
|
8,743 |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
80,881 |
|
|
38,285 |
|
|
(11,632) |
|
|
(1,635) |
|
|
11,822 |
|
|
(7,365) |
|
|
110,356 |
Net investment income |
|
|
63,751 |
|
|
6,702 |
|
|
13,387 |
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
(11,822) |
|
|
(5,137) |
|
|
68,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on non-control/non-affiliate investments, including U.S. Treasury Bills |
|
|
(2,939) |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,695) |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, including U.S. Treasury Bills |
|
|
(2,939) |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,695) |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on non-control/non-affiliate investments, including U.S. Treasury Bills |
|
|
(372) |
|
|
4,901 |
|
|
5,696 |
(4m) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
10,225 |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on affiliate investments |
|
|
12,779 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
12,779 |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on control investments |
|
|
390 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
390 |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts and foreign currency transactions |
|
|
- |
|
|
641 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
12,797 |
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
5,696 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
24,035 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
9,858 |
|
|
6,786 |
|
|
5,696 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
22,340 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
|
$ |
73,609 |
|
$ |
13,488 |
|
$ |
19,083 |
|
$ |
1,635 |
|
$ |
(11,822) |
|
$ |
(5,137) |
|
$ |
90,856 |
Net investment income per common share (basic and diluted) |
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per common share (basic and diluted) |
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic and diluted) |
|
|
38,852,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,503,642 |
See notes to pro forma consolidated financial statements.
43
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Schedule of Investments
As of September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
Portfolio Company |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment Description(1)(2)(4) |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) / |
|
RWAY |
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
SWK |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
% of Pro Forma Net Assets |
|
Footnotes |
||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Debt Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Airship Group, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+3.75%, 9.08% floor, 3.00% PIK, 3.25% ETP |
|
6/15/2028 |
|
50,263 |
|
50,049 |
|
50,632 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
50,049 |
|
50,632 |
|
9.10% |
|
(10) (11) (12) |
|
|
Blueshift Labs, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+8.25% PIK, 11.25% floor, 1.50% ETP |
|
12/15/2028 |
|
27,702 |
|
27,529 |
|
23,272 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
27,529 |
|
23,272 |
|
4.18% |
|
(10) (11) |
|
|
Blueshift Labs, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+8.25% PIK, 11.25% floor |
|
12/15/2028 |
|
532 |
|
532 |
|
941 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
532 |
|
941 |
|
0.17% |
|
(10) (22) |
|
|
Blueshift Labs, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+8.25% PIK, 11.25% floor |
|
12/15/2028 |
|
750 |
|
743 |
|
998 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
743 |
|
998 |
|
0.18% |
|
(10) (22) |
|
|
CarNow, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.25%, 11.75% floor, 1.60% ETP |
|
3/22/2029 |
|
20,000 |
|
18,135 |
|
18,804 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
18,135 |
|
18,804 |
|
3.38% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Piano Software, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.25%, 11.25% floor, 1.50% ETP |
|
12/31/2029 |
|
43,000 |
|
42,126 |
|
42,864 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
42,126 |
|
42,864 |
|
7.70% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
VTX Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (dba VertexOne) |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 8.00% floor, 1.00% PIK, 3.00% ETP |
|
9/24/2029 |
|
35,270 |
|
35,093 |
|
34,895 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
35,093 |
|
34,895 |
|
6.27% |
|
(10) (11) (12) |
|
|
VTX Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (dba VertexOne) |
|
Second Lien |
|
FIXED 12.50% PIK, 31.05% ETP |
|
9/24/2029 |
|
6,426 |
|
6,185 |
|
6,210 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
6,185 |
|
6,210 |
|
1.12% |
|
(10) (11) |
|
|
Zinnia Corporate Holdings, LLC |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+5.50%, 7.50% floor |
|
9/21/2029 |
|
40,000 |
|
39,326 |
|
40,020 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
39,326 |
|
40,020 |
|
7.19% |
|
(12) |
|
|
Total Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
219,718 |
|
218,636 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
219,718 |
|
218,636 |
|
39.28% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Bombora, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+4.75%, 6.75% floor, 3.25% PIK, 1.10% ETP |
|
1/15/2028 |
|
30,634 |
|
30,652 |
|
30,802 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
30,652 |
|
30,802 |
|
5.53% |
|
(10) (11) (12) |
|
|
Elevate Services, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.50%, 12.78% floor, 0.50% ETP |
|
7/10/2027 |
|
39,000 |
|
38,231 |
|
39,195 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
38,231 |
|
39,195 |
|
7.04% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Shepherd Intermediate, LLC (dba FHAS) |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.25%, 8.25% floor |
|
7/10/2030 |
|
7,500 |
|
7,376 |
|
7,391 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
7,376 |
|
7,391 |
|
1.33% |
|
(12) |
|
|
Shepherd Intermediate, LLC (dba FHAS) (Revolver) |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.25%, 8.25% floor |
|
7/10/2030 |
|
N/A |
|
(6) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(6) |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(12) |
|
|
Swing Education, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 10.80% floor, 3.50% ETP |
|
6/15/2029 |
|
8,000 |
|
7,886 |
|
7,887 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
7,886 |
|
7,887 |
|
1.42% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Swing Education, Inc. (Revolver) |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+6.65%, 10.45% floor |
|
6/1/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
(183) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(183) |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(12) |
|
|
Total Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
83,956 |
|
85,275 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
83,956 |
|
85,275 |
|
15.32% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Marley Spoon SE |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+ 8.75% PIK, 9.51% floor, 1.00% ETP |
|
6/15/2027 |
|
43,863 |
|
44,014 |
|
34,469 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
44,014 |
|
34,469 |
|
6.19% |
|
(6) (9) (10) (11) (18) |
|
|
Marley Spoon SE |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+ 8.75% PIK, 9.51% floor |
|
6/15/2027 |
|
2,892 |
|
2,892 |
|
2,273 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,892 |
|
2,273 |
|
0.41% |
|
(6) (9) (10) (18) |
|
|
Marley Spoon SE |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+ 8.75% PIK, 9.51% floor |
|
11/15/2025 |
|
3,975 |
|
3,975 |
|
3,124 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,975 |
|
3,124 |
|
0.56% |
|
(6) (9) (10) (18) |
|
|
Total Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
50,881 |
|
39,866 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
50,881 |
|
39,866 |
|
7.16% |
|
|
||||
44
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Schedule of Investments - (Continued)
As of September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
Portfolio Company |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment Description(1)(2)(4) |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) / |
|
RWAY |
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
SWK |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
% of Pro Forma Net Assets |
|
Footnotes |
||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Debt Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Financial Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Autobooks, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.50%, 11.77% floor, 2.75% ETP |
|
2/5/2028 |
|
28,600 |
|
28,011 |
|
28,020 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
28,011 |
|
28,020 |
|
5.03% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Hurricane Cleanco Limited |
|
Senior Secured |
|
FIXED 6.25%, 6.25% PIK |
|
11/22/2029 |
|
30,006 |
|
28,052 |
|
30,352 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
28,052 |
|
30,352 |
|
5.45% |
|
(5) (9) (10) (21) |
|
|
Vesta Payment Solutions, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 9.00% floor, 6.00% ETP |
|
11/15/2026 |
|
25,000 |
|
25,848 |
|
22,146 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
25,848 |
|
22,146 |
|
3.98% |
|
(11) |
|
|
Total Financial Services |
|
|
|
|
|
81,911 |
|
80,518 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
81,911 |
|
80,518 |
|
14.47% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Biotricity, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+10.76%, 11.50% floor, 11.28% ETP |
|
2/15/2027 |
|
13,846 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
14,413 |
|
13,846 |
|
13,846 |
|
13,846 |
|
2.49% |
|
(11) (33) |
|
|
EBR Systems, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+4.90%, 8.90% floor, 4.50% ETP |
|
6/15/2027 |
|
40,000 |
|
40,509 |
|
41,011 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
40,509 |
|
41,011 |
|
7.37% |
|
(11) (12) (16) |
|
|
ImpediMed LTC |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+9.50%, 13.75% floor, 9.00% ETP |
|
2/5/2030 |
|
15,000 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
14,594 |
|
14,282 |
|
14,282 |
|
14,282 |
|
2.57% |
|
(9) (11) (16) (31) |
|
|
Mingle Healthcare Solutions, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+9.75%, 12.26% floor, 10.50% ETP |
|
12/15/2026 |
|
4,127 |
|
4,757 |
|
2,363 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
4,757 |
|
2,363 |
|
0.42% |
|
(11) (26) |
|
|
MedMinder Systems, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+5.35%, 10.10% floor, 6.00% ETP |
|
8/18/2028 |
|
22,500 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
22,987 |
|
21,894 |
|
21,893 |
|
21,894 |
|
3.93% |
|
(11) |
|
|
Moximed, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+5.25%, 8.75% floor, 3.50% ETP |
|
7/1/2027 |
|
15,000 |
|
15,198 |
|
15,427 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
15,198 |
|
15,427 |
|
2.77% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Onward Medical, N.V. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+6.50%, 10.75% floor, 2.50% ETP |
|
6/15/2028 |
|
17,088 |
|
16,833 |
|
17,080 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
16,833 |
|
17,080 |
|
3.07% |
|
(8) (9) (11) (12) (17) |
|
|
Route 92 Medical, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 9.00% floor, 3.95% ETP |
|
3/31/2029 |
|
35,000 |
|
34,317 |
|
34,746 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
34,317 |
|
34,746 |
|
6.24% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Triple Ring Technologies, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.50%, 12.00% floor, 7.75% ETP |
|
12/6/2028 |
|
8,000 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
8,049 |
|
7,891 |
|
7,891 |
|
7,891 |
|
1.42% |
|
(11) |
|
|
Total Health Care Equipment & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
111,614 |
|
110,627 |
|
60,043 |
|
57,913 |
|
169,526 |
|
168,540 |
|
30.28% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Household & Personal Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Madison Reed, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+5.00%, 12.50% floor, 3.00% ETP |
|
8/29/2029 |
|
40,000 |
|
39,230 |
|
39,234 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
39,230 |
|
39,234 |
|
7.05% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Total Household & Personal Products |
|
|
|
|
|
39,230 |
|
39,234 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
39,230 |
|
39,234 |
|
7.05% |
|
|
||||
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Kin Insurance, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+5.00%, 12.00% floor, 2.00% ETP |
|
8/13/2029 |
|
45,000 |
|
43,782 |
|
43,786 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
43,782 |
|
43,786 |
|
7.87% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Total Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
43,782 |
|
43,786 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
43,782 |
|
43,786 |
|
7.87% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media & Entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Skillshare, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+6.75%, 10.96% floor, 2.00% ETP |
|
2/8/2029 |
|
12,614 |
|
12,458 |
|
12,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,458 |
|
12,462 |
|
2.24% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Snap! Mobile, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.50%, 12.10% floor, 3.83% ETP |
|
9/30/2028 |
|
18,000 |
|
17,699 |
|
17,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
17,699 |
|
17,724 |
|
3.18% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Total Media & Entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
30,157 |
|
30,186 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
30,157 |
|
30,186 |
|
5.42% |
|
|
||||
45
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Schedule of Investments - (Continued)
As of September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
Portfolio Company |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment Description(1)(2)(4) |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) / |
|
RWAY |
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
SWK |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
% of Pro Forma Net Assets |
|
Footnotes |
||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Debt Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
4WEB, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+9.25%, 12.75% floor, 35.38% ETP |
|
12/31/2027 |
|
19,486 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
23,037 |
|
24,428 |
|
24,427 |
|
24,428 |
|
4.39% |
|
(11) |
|
|
Advanced Oxygen Therapy, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.75%, 10.90% floor, 5.60% ETP |
|
2/15/2029 |
|
19,478 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
19,623 |
|
19,623 |
|
19,622 |
|
19,623 |
|
3.53% |
|
(11) (32) |
|
|
Elutia, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+3.75%, 6.50% floor, 4.50% PIK, 6.95% ETP |
|
8/10/2027 |
|
22,074 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
27,372 |
|
27,372 |
|
27,371 |
|
27,372 |
|
4.92% |
|
(10) (11) (15) |
|
|
Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+6.75%, 11.75% floor, 5.00% ETP |
|
12/17/2027 |
|
30,000 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
29,644 |
|
29,644 |
|
29,643 |
|
29,644 |
|
5.33% |
|
(9) (11) (15) |
|
|
Goodwin Biotechnology, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+5.03%, 9.28% floor, 3.98% PIK, 5.00% ETP |
|
9/13/2027 |
|
5,000 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5,491 |
|
5,400 |
|
5,400 |
|
5,400 |
|
0.97% |
|
(10) (11) |
|
|
Journey Medical Corporation |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.75%, 12.75% floor, 5.00% ETP |
|
12/27/2027 |
|
25,000 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
25,213 |
|
24,709 |
|
24,708 |
|
24,709 |
|
4.44% |
|
(11) (15) |
|
|
NeoLight, LLC |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+6.50%, 13.50% floor, 11.00% ETP |
|
5/15/2027 |
|
5,553 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5,923 |
|
5,478 |
|
5,478 |
|
5,478 |
|
0.98% |
|
(11) |
|
|
Nicoya Lifesciences, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+9.00%, 12.75% floor, 9.00% ETP |
|
11/30/2026 |
|
8,500 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
8,846 |
|
8,585 |
|
8,585 |
|
8,585 |
|
1.54% |
|
(7) (9) (11) |
|
|
Shield Therapeutics PLC |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+9.25%, 14.25% floor, 6.56% ETP |
|
9/28/2028 |
|
20,000 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
20,033 |
|
20,046 |
|
20,045 |
|
20,046 |
|
3.60% |
|
(5) (9) (11) (32) |
|
|
SKNV, LLC |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.75%, 12.00% floor, 8.84% ETP |
|
11/15/2028 |
|
15,997 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
16,409 |
|
16,409 |
|
16,409 |
|
16,409 |
|
2.95% |
|
(11) |
|
|
Total Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
181,591 |
|
181,694 |
|
181,688 |
|
181,694 |
|
32.65% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systems Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
3PL Central LLC (dba Extensiv) |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 9.00% floor, 5.00% ETP |
|
3/31/2026 |
|
72,290 |
|
75,421 |
|
70,266 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
75,421 |
|
70,266 |
|
12.63% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Digicert, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+5.75%, 6.50% floor |
|
7/30/2030 |
|
9,327 |
|
9,191 |
|
9,362 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
9,191 |
|
9,362 |
|
1.68% |
|
(12) (28) |
|
|
Digicert, Inc. (Revolver) |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+5.75%, 6.50% floor |
|
7/30/2030 |
|
N/A |
|
(9) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(9) |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(12) (28) |
|
|
Circadence Corporation |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+9.50%, 12.26% floor, 7.50% ETP |
|
12/15/2025 |
|
22,002 |
|
23,352 |
|
19,358 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
23,352 |
|
19,358 |
|
3.48% |
|
(11) |
|
|
Synack, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 11.07% floor, 1.00% ETP |
|
12/29/2028 |
|
45,000 |
|
44,887 |
|
45,074 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
44,887 |
|
45,074 |
|
8.10% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Total Systems Software |
|
|
|
|
|
152,842 |
|
144,060 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
152,842 |
|
144,060 |
|
25.88% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Hardware & Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Brivo, Inc. |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.25%, 11.29% floor, 2.53% ETP |
|
12/15/2029 |
|
40,000 |
|
39,856 |
|
41,003 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
39,856 |
|
41,003 |
|
7.37% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Dejero Labs Inc. |
|
Second Lien |
|
SOFR+8.00%, 8.50% floor, 2.00% PIK, 3.00% ETP |
|
12/22/2025 |
|
14,685 |
|
15,036 |
|
14,967 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
15,036 |
|
14,967 |
|
2.69% |
|
(7) (9) (10) (11) (12) |
|
|
Linxup, LLC |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+3.25%, 11.75% floor, 2.25% ETP |
|
11/15/2027 |
|
30,000 |
|
29,983 |
|
30,655 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
29,983 |
|
30,655 |
|
5.51% |
|
(11) (12) |
|
|
Total Technology Hardware & Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
84,875 |
|
86,625 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
84,875 |
|
86,625 |
|
15.56% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
898,966 |
|
878,813 |
|
241,634 |
|
239,607 |
|
1,138,566 |
|
1,118,420 |
|
200.95% |
|
|
|||||
46
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Schedule of Investments - (Continued)
As of September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
Portfolio Company |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment Description(1)(2)(4) |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) / |
|
RWAY |
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
SWK |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
% of Pro Forma Net Assets |
|
Footnotes |
||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Equity Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Aria Systems, Inc. |
|
Equity |
|
Series G Preferred Stock |
|
N/A |
|
289,419 |
|
250 |
|
323 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
250 |
|
323 |
|
0.06% |
|
(13) |
|
|
VTX Holdings, LLC |
|
Equity |
|
Series C Preferred Units |
|
N/A |
|
3,015,219 |
|
143 |
|
23 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
143 |
|
23 |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Total Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
346 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
393 |
|
346 |
|
0.06% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
FiscalNote, Inc. |
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
19,240 |
|
438 |
|
89 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
438 |
|
89 |
|
0.02% |
|
(13) (14) (19) |
|
|
JobGet Holdings, Inc. (fka Snagajob, Inc.) |
|
Equity |
|
Series C-1 Preferred Stock |
|
N/A |
|
476,564 |
|
39,275 |
|
27,200 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
39,275 |
|
27,200 |
|
4.89% |
|
(13) (27) |
|
|
JobGet Holdings, Inc. (fka Snagajob, Inc.) |
|
Equity |
|
Series C-2 Preferred Stock |
|
N/A |
|
16,963 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) (27) |
|
|
Total Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
39,713 |
|
27,289 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
39,713 |
|
27,289 |
|
4.90% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marley Spoon SE |
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
46,004 |
|
410 |
|
19 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
410 |
|
19 |
|
0.00% |
|
(6) (9) (13) (18) (19) (21) |
|
|
Total Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
410 |
|
19 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
410 |
|
19 |
|
0.00% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
CareCloud, Inc. |
|
Equity |
|
8.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock |
|
N/A |
|
462,064 |
|
12,132 |
|
9,669 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
12,132 |
|
9,669 |
|
1.74% |
|
(15) |
|
|
Epica International, Inc. |
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
25,000 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
167 |
|
166 |
|
167 |
|
0.03% |
|
(13) |
|
|
MolecuLight, Inc. |
|
Equity |
|
Series B-3 Preferred Stock |
|
N/A |
|
250,000 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
44 |
|
44 |
|
44 |
|
0.01% |
|
(7) (9) (13) |
|
|
Total Health Care Equipment & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
12,132 |
|
9,669 |
|
- |
|
211 |
|
12,342 |
|
9,880 |
|
1.78% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media & Entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Minute Media Inc. |
|
Equity |
|
Preferred Stock |
|
N/A |
|
1,039 |
|
120 |
|
171 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
120 |
|
171 |
|
0.03% |
|
(5) (9) (13) |
|
|
Minute Media Inc. |
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
136 |
|
16 |
|
21 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
16 |
|
21 |
|
0.00% |
|
(5) (9) (13) |
|
|
Total Media & Entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
192 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
136 |
|
192 |
|
0.03% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Advanced Oxygen Therapy, Inc. |
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
402,634 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
230 |
|
230 |
|
230 |
|
230 |
|
0.04% |
|
(13) (32) |
|
|
Elutia, Inc. |
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
50,000 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
45 |
|
45 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
0.01% |
|
(13) (15) |
|
|
Sincerus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
26,575 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
552 |
|
551 |
|
552 |
|
0.10% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Total Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
275 |
|
827 |
|
825 |
|
827 |
|
0.15% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
52,784 |
|
37,515 |
|
275 |
|
1,038 |
|
53,819 |
|
38,553 |
|
6.93% |
|
|
|||||
47
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Schedule of Investments - (Continued)
As of September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
Portfolio Company |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment Description(1)(2)(4) |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) / |
|
RWAY |
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
SWK |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
% of Pro Forma Net Assets |
|
Footnotes |
||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
3DNA Corp. (dba NationBuilder) |
|
Warrants |
|
Series C-1 Preferred Stock |
|
12/28/2028 |
|
273,164 |
|
104 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
104 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Airship Group, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series F Preferred Stock |
|
6/28/2034 |
|
519,313 |
|
414 |
|
442 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
414 |
|
442 |
|
0.08% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Aria Systems, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series G Preferred Stock |
|
6/29/2028 |
|
2,387,705 |
|
1,048 |
|
1,329 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,048 |
|
1,329 |
|
0.24% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Blueshift Labs, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
167 |
|
166 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
167 |
|
166 |
|
0.03% |
|
(13) (20) |
|
|
CarNow, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/22/2034 |
|
200,000 |
|
2,400 |
|
3,026 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,400 |
|
3,026 |
|
0.54% |
|
(13) |
|
|
INRIX, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
7/26/2029 |
|
150,804 |
|
522 |
|
326 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
522 |
|
326 |
|
0.06% |
|
(13) |
|
|
JWP Holdco LLC (fka Longtail Ad Solutions, Inc.) |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Units |
|
12/12/2029 |
|
167,827 |
|
47 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
47 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Piano Software, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
12/31/2034 |
|
119,978 |
|
348 |
|
491 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
348 |
|
491 |
|
0.09% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Predactiv, Inc. (fka Sharethis, Inc.) |
|
Warrants |
|
Series D-3 Preferred Stock |
|
12/3/2028 |
|
647,615 |
|
2,162 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,162 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Total Application Software |
|
|
|
|
7,212 |
|
5,780 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
7,212 |
|
5,780 |
|
1.04% |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
AllClear ID, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
8/31/2027 |
|
870,514 |
|
1,750 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,750 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Bombora, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/31/2031 |
|
121,581 |
|
174 |
|
113 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
174 |
|
113 |
|
0.02% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Bombora, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
12/26/2033 |
|
54,711 |
|
48 |
|
51 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
48 |
|
51 |
|
0.01% |
|
(13) |
|
|
CloudPay, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B Preferred Stock |
|
6/30/2030 |
|
11,273 |
|
218 |
|
1,311 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
218 |
|
1,311 |
|
0.24% |
|
(5) (9) (13) |
|
|
CloudPay, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
8/17/2031 |
|
3,502 |
|
52 |
|
86 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
52 |
|
86 |
|
0.02% |
|
(5) (9) (13) |
|
|
CloudPay, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
9/26/2032 |
|
5,252 |
|
176 |
|
130 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
176 |
|
130 |
|
0.02% |
|
(5) (9) (13) |
|
|
Elevate Services, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
7/10/2033 |
|
248,997 |
|
447 |
|
416 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
447 |
|
416 |
|
0.07% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Elevate Services, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
7/17/2034 |
|
236,549 |
|
377 |
|
536 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
377 |
|
536 |
|
0.10% |
|
(13) |
|
|
FiscalNote, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Earnout |
|
7/29/2027 |
|
N/A |
|
127 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
127 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) (14) (20) |
|
|
JobGet Holdings, Inc. (fka Snagajob, Inc.) |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B-1 Preferred Stock |
|
9/29/2031 |
|
763,269 |
|
343 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
343 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Swing Education, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
6/27/2035 |
|
196,160 |
|
19 |
|
23 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
19 |
|
23 |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Total Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
2,666 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,731 |
|
2,666 |
|
0.48% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Autobooks, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Success Fee |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
489 |
|
508 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
489 |
|
508 |
|
0.09% |
|
(13) (20) |
|
|
Betterment Holdings, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
10/6/2033 |
|
7,680 |
|
35 |
|
60 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
35 |
|
60 |
|
0.01% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Betterment Holdings, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
10/6/2033 |
|
9,818 |
|
40 |
|
68 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
40 |
|
68 |
|
0.01% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Credit Sesame, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
1/7/2030 |
|
191,601 |
|
425 |
|
529 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
425 |
|
529 |
|
0.10% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Total Financial Services |
|
|
|
|
|
989 |
|
1,165 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
989 |
|
1,165 |
|
0.21% |
|
|
||||
48
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Schedule of Investments - (Continued)
As of September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
Portfolio Company |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment Description(1)(2)(4) |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) / |
|
RWAY |
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
SWK |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
% of Pro Forma Net Assets |
|
Footnotes |
||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Allurion Technologies, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/30/2031 |
|
5,320 |
|
282 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
282 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) (14) |
|
|
Allurion Technologies, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/30/2031 |
|
1,851 |
|
141 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
141 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) (14) |
|
|
Allurion Technologies, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
9/15/2032 |
|
1,850 |
|
144 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
144 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) (14) |
|
|
Allurion Technologies, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Earnout |
|
8/1/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) (14) (20) |
|
|
Biotricity, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
12/21/2028 |
|
9,589 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) (33) |
|
|
Biotricity, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
8/25/2030 |
|
54,300 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
26 |
|
26 |
|
26 |
|
26 |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) (33) |
|
|
Biotricity, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
11/11/2031 |
|
600,000 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
307 |
|
307 |
|
307 |
|
307 |
|
0.06% |
|
(13) (33) |
|
|
EBR Systems, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
6/30/2032 |
|
N/A |
|
605 |
|
602 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
605 |
|
602 |
|
0.11% |
|
(13) (16) (20) |
|
|
Epica International, Inc.(30) |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
7/24/2027 |
|
581,818 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,771 |
|
1,771 |
|
1,771 |
|
0.32% |
|
(13) |
|
|
ImpediMed LTC |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
2/6/2032 |
|
12,491,870 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
180 |
|
180 |
|
180 |
|
180 |
|
0.03% |
|
(9) (13) (16) (31) |
|
|
ImpediMed LTC |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
7/23/2032 |
|
6,245,935 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
90 |
|
90 |
|
90 |
|
90 |
|
0.02% |
|
(9) (13) (16) (31) |
|
|
MedMinder Systems, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
8/18/2029 |
|
65,092 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
119 |
|
119 |
|
119 |
|
0.02% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Mingle Healthcare Solutions, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series CC Preferred Stock |
|
8/15/2028 |
|
1,770,973 |
|
492 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
492 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
MolecuLight, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
12/28/2028 |
|
394,322 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
0.00% |
|
(7) (9) (13) |
|
|
Moximed, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
6/24/2032 |
|
214,285 |
|
175 |
|
28 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
175 |
|
28 |
|
0.01% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Nalu Medical, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series D-2 Preferred Stock |
|
10/12/2032 |
|
91,717 |
|
173 |
|
30 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
173 |
|
30 |
|
0.01% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Onward Medical, N.V. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
9/26/2034 |
|
165,338 |
|
340 |
|
459 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
340 |
|
459 |
|
0.08% |
|
(8) (9) (13) (17) (21) |
|
|
Route 92 Medical, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
3/31/2035 |
|
N/A |
|
833 |
|
649 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
833 |
|
649 |
|
0.12% |
|
(13) (20) |
|
|
SetPoint Medical Corporation |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B Preferred Stock |
|
6/29/2031 |
|
400,000 |
|
14 |
|
142 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
14 |
|
142 |
|
0.03% |
|
(13) |
|
|
SetPoint Medical Corporation |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B Preferred Stock |
|
12/29/2032 |
|
600,000 |
|
74 |
|
213 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
74 |
|
213 |
|
0.04% |
|
(13) |
|
|
VERO Biotech LLC |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
12/29/2025 |
|
N/A |
|
377 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
377 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) (20) |
|
|
Total Health Care Equipment & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
2,123 |
|
605 |
|
2,500 |
|
6,150 |
|
4,623 |
|
0.83% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Household & Personal Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Madison Reed, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
404 |
|
414 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
404 |
|
414 |
|
0.07% |
|
(13) (20) |
|
|
Total Household & Personal Products |
|
|
|
|
|
404 |
|
414 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
404 |
|
414 |
|
0.07% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Kin Insurance, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series D-3 Preferred Stock |
|
9/26/2032 |
|
62,364 |
|
426 |
|
374 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
426 |
|
374 |
|
0.07% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Kin Insurance, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series E Preferred Stock |
|
8/13/2035 |
|
15,928 |
|
818 |
|
819 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
818 |
|
819 |
|
0.15% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Total Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
1,193 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,244 |
|
1,193 |
|
0.21% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media & Entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Skillshare, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
337 |
|
309 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
337 |
|
309 |
|
0.06% |
|
(13) (20) |
|
|
Snap! Mobile, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B Preferred Stock |
|
9/30/2034 |
|
19,140 |
|
345 |
|
293 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
345 |
|
293 |
|
0.05% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Total Media & Entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
682 |
|
602 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
682 |
|
602 |
|
0.11% |
|
|
||||
49
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Schedule of Investments - (Continued)
As of September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
Portfolio Company |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment Description(1)(2)(4) |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) / |
|
RWAY |
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
SWK |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
% of Pro Forma Net Assets |
|
Footnotes |
||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
4WEB, Inc.(30) |
|
Warrants |
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
9/3/2031 |
|
727,788 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,921 |
|
2,920 |
|
2,921 |
|
0.52% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Elutia, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
8/10/2029 |
|
157,895 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
38 |
|
38 |
|
38 |
|
38 |
|
0.01% |
|
(13) (15) |
|
|
Elutia, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
8/10/2029 |
|
30,075 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) (15) |
|
|
Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
11/13/2026 |
|
51,239 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
829 |
|
807 |
|
807 |
|
807 |
|
0.14% |
|
(9) (13) (15) |
|
|
Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
8/12/2027 |
|
18,141 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
288 |
|
272 |
|
272 |
|
272 |
|
0.05% |
|
(9) (13) (15) |
|
|
Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
9/30/2031 |
|
289,736 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5,350 |
|
5,038 |
|
5,038 |
|
5,038 |
|
0.91% |
|
(9) (13) (15) |
|
|
Goodwin Biotechnology, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
9/13/2030 |
|
211,442 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
60 |
|
60 |
|
60 |
|
0.01% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Mustang Bio, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/4/2032 |
|
997 |
|
315 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
315 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) (15) |
|
|
NeoLight, LLC |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B-2 Preferred Stock |
|
2/17/2030 |
|
105,048 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
13 |
|
13 |
|
13 |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Nicoya Lifesciences, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-3 Preferred Stock |
|
10/13/2030 |
|
117,305 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
23 |
|
23 |
|
23 |
|
0.00% |
|
(7) (9) (13) |
|
|
Nicoya Lifesciences, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B-1 Preferred Stock |
|
5/27/2032 |
|
276,630 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
144 |
|
144 |
|
144 |
|
0.03% |
|
(7) (9) (13) |
|
|
Shield Therapeutics PLC |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
10/2/2029 |
|
8,910,540 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
482 |
|
482 |
|
482 |
|
482 |
|
0.09% |
|
(5) (9) (13) (32) |
|
|
DxTerity Diagnostics, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B Preferred Stock |
|
12/31/2026 |
|
2,019,231 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
123 |
|
122 |
|
123 |
|
0.02% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. (fka Acer Therapeutics, Inc.) |
|
Warrants |
|
Contingent Value Right |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(9) (13) (15) (20) |
|
|
Total Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
315 |
|
- |
|
6,994 |
|
9,928 |
|
10,241 |
|
9,928 |
|
1.78% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systems Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Circadence Corporation |
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-6 Preferred Stock |
|
12/20/2028 |
|
1,538,462 |
|
3,630 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,630 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Circadence Corporation |
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-6 Preferred Stock |
|
10/31/2029 |
|
384,615 |
|
846 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
846 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Circadence Corporation |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
304 |
|
433 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
304 |
|
433 |
|
0.08% |
|
(13) (20) |
|
|
Scale Computing, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/29/2029 |
|
9,665,667 |
|
346 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
346 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Synack, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
6/30/2032 |
|
131,521 |
|
168 |
|
191 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
168 |
|
191 |
|
0.03% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Total Systems Software |
|
|
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
624 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5,294 |
|
624 |
|
0.11% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Hardware & Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Brivo, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-2 Preferred Stock |
|
10/20/2032 |
|
201,000 |
|
98 |
|
371 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
98 |
|
371 |
|
0.07% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Brivo, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-2 Preferred Stock |
|
12/27/2034 |
|
32,109 |
|
43 |
|
59 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
43 |
|
59 |
|
0.01% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Dejero Labs Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
5/31/2029 |
|
333,621 |
|
192 |
|
125 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
192 |
|
125 |
|
0.02% |
|
(7) (9) (13) |
|
|
Linxup, LLC |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
11/3/2033 |
|
N/A |
|
253 |
|
241 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
253 |
|
241 |
|
0.04% |
|
(13) (20) |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-1 Preferred Stock |
|
10/5/2028 |
|
73,746 |
|
89 |
|
134 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
89 |
|
134 |
|
0.02% |
|
(13) |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
10/5/2028 |
|
38,705 |
|
47 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
47 |
|
1 |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-1 Preferred Stock |
|
12/28/2028 |
|
14,749 |
|
16 |
|
27 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
16 |
|
27 |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
12/28/2028 |
|
7,742 |
|
9 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
9 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-1 Preferred Stock |
|
6/27/2029 |
|
81,251 |
|
250 |
|
61 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
250 |
|
61 |
|
0.01% |
|
(13) |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
6/27/2029 |
|
42,643 |
|
131 |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
131 |
|
1 |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Total Technology Hardware & Equipment |
|
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
1,020 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,128 |
|
1,020 |
|
0.18% |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
24,649 |
|
15,587 |
|
7,599 |
|
12,428 |
|
37,075 |
|
28,015 |
|
5.03% |
|
|
|||||
50
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Schedule of Investments - (Continued)
As of September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
Portfolio Company |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment Description(1)(2)(4) |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) / |
|
RWAY |
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
SWK |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
% of Pro Forma Net Assets |
|
Footnotes |
||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Royalty Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Exeevo, Inc. |
|
Royalty |
|
Royalty - Gross Margin Earnout |
|
9/30/2027 |
|
N/A |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
621 |
|
621 |
|
621 |
|
0.11% |
|
(26) |
|
|
Total Application Software |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
621 |
|
621 |
|
621 |
|
0.11% |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Best ABT, Inc. |
|
Royalty |
|
Royalty |
|
11/12/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,347 |
|
2,008 |
|
2,008 |
|
2,008 |
|
0.36% |
|
(26) |
|
|
Flowonix Medical, Inc. |
|
Royalty |
|
Royalty |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
- |
|
- |
|
6,633 |
|
5,638 |
|
5,638 |
|
5,638 |
|
1.01% |
|
(26) |
|
|
Ideal Implant, Inc. |
|
Royalty |
|
Royalty |
|
2/1/2039 |
|
N/A |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,522 |
|
2,143 |
|
2,143 |
|
2,143 |
|
0.39% |
|
(26) |
|
|
Total Health Care Equipment & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
11,502 |
|
9,789 |
|
9,789 |
|
9,789 |
|
1.76% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
InSite Vision Inc. |
|
Royalty |
|
Royalty |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(26) |
|
|
Total Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Royalty Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
11,502 |
|
10,410 |
|
10,410 |
|
10,410 |
|
1.87% |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
976,399 |
|
931,915 |
|
261,010 |
|
263,483 |
|
1,239,870 |
|
1,195,398 |
|
214.78% |
|
|
||||||
51
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Pro Forma Consolidated Schedule of Investments - (Continued)
As of September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
Portfolio Company |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment Description(1)(2)(4) |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) / |
|
RWAY |
|
RWAY |
|
SWK |
|
SWK |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
% of Pro Forma Net Assets |
|
Footnotes |
||
Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24) |
||||||
|
Equity Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Coginiti Corp |
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
1,040,160 |
|
4,551 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
4,551 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Total Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
4,551 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
4,551 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Coginiti Corp |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/9/2030 |
|
811,770 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
(13) |
|
|
Total Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
4,551 |
|
- |
|
0.00% |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25) |
||||||
|
Equity Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Pivot3, Inc. |
|
Equity |
|
100% Equity Interest |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
950 |
|
1,194 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
950 |
|
1,194 |
|
0.21% |
|
(23) |
|
|
Total Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
950 |
|
1,194 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
950 |
|
1,194 |
|
0.21% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-Sector Holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Runway-Cadma I LLC |
|
Equity |
|
50% Equity Interest |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
12,283 |
|
12,855 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
12,283 |
|
12,855 |
|
2.31% |
|
(9) |
|
|
Total Multi-Sector Holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
12,283 |
|
12,855 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
12,283 |
|
12,855 |
|
2.31% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
13,233 |
|
14,049 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
13,233 |
|
14,049 |
|
2.52% |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
13,233 |
|
14,049 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
13,233 |
|
14,049 |
|
2.52% |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
994,183 |
|
945,964 |
|
261,010 |
|
263,483 |
|
1,257,654 |
|
1,209,447 |
|
217.31% |
|
|
||||||
52
Table of Contents
53
Table of Contents
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Notes to Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
Note 1 - Basis of Pro Forma Presentation
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X. The Mergers will be accounted for as an asset acquisition by RWAY under ASC 805-50, Business Combinations – Related Issues. In an asset acquisition, the total purchase cost is allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. This method does not result in goodwill. Further, because SWK does not meet the definition of a fund under Regulation S-X Rule 6-11, which provides relief from certain disclosure requirements for the acquisition of a fund, the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are subject to the requirements of Rule 3-05 of Regulation S-X.
The actual consolidated financial statements of RWAY and SWK were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and presented in thousands, except share and per share data. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements have been derived from the actual consolidated financial statements of RWAY and SWK. Certain SWK audited and unaudited actual consolidated balances have been reclassified to conform to RWAY’s financial statement presentation. Refer to “Note 3 - Reclassification Adjustments” for a summary of these adjustments. The unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of September 30, 2025, gives effect to the Mergers as if they had occurred on such date. The Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of Operations audited for the year ended December 31, 2024 and unaudited for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 give effect to the Mergers as if they had occurred on January 1, 2024.
The actual consolidated financial statements have been adjusted in the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements to illustrate the estimated effect of the Mergers in accordance with Regulation S-X Rule 11-02. These adjustments include the effects of conforming accounting policies. A significant accounting policy difference exists between the two entities, as SWK historically measured its loan investments at amortized cost, whereas RWAY, as an investment company, is required to report such loan investments at fair value in accordance with ASC 946, Financial Services—Investment Companies. Refer to “Note 4 - Transaction Adjustments” for the quantitative impact of these adjustments.
The actual Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and for the year ended December 31, 2024 of SWK include the results of its wholly-owned subsidiary, MOD3 Pharma Inc., and a majority of SWK’s royalty portfolio, which has since been sold and is not part of the Mergers. MOD3 Pharma Inc. was divested to AptarGroup, Inc. on July 15, 2025, and the majority of the royalty portfolio was sold to Soleus Capital on April 10, 2025. The accompanying pro forma consolidated financial statements incorporate “Asset Sale” adjustments to reflect these divestitures. Refer to “Note 7 - Asset Sale Adjustments” for more information.
In addition to the transaction accounting adjustments, as further described in “Note 4 - Transaction Adjustments,” which reflect RWAY’s asset acquisition accounting entries, the pro forma consolidated financial statements also include adjustments to reflect the effects of certain conditions upon which the closing of the Mergers is contingent. These “Other Transaction Adjustments” give effect to certain closing conditions which must occur in order for RWAY to remain in compliance with the RWAY Investment Advisory Agreement and regulatory requirements. Refer to “Note 5 - Other Transaction Adjustments” for more information regarding these adjustments.
In connection with the Mergers, a portion of the outstanding shares of SWK Common Stock will be exchanged for newly issued shares of RWAY Common Stock calculated as $75.5 million divided by the RWAY Per Share NAV calculated at Closing. The total purchase price consideration as reflected in “Estimated Consideration of the Mergers” within “Note 2 – Purchase Price Allocation” will be allocated to the individual assets acquired or liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values of net identifiable assets acquired other than “non-qualifying” assets (for example, cash) and would not give rise to goodwill. To the extent that the market price of RWAY’s Common Stock does not closely approximate RWAY Per Share NAV calculated at closing, the difference between the total purchase price consideration and the fair value of SWK’s net assets acquired will result in a purchase discount or premium (henceforth referred to as the “purchase discount (or premium)”). For purposes of the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements, a purchase discount is presumed. The purchase discount is allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities of SWK based on its fair value as of Closing. Immediately following the Mergers, RWAY records its investments, including the acquired SWK investments, at their respective fair values and, as a result, the purchase discount allocated to the cost basis of the investments acquired from SWK would be recognized as unrealized gain on investments. The purchase discount allocated to the acquired SWK debt investments will accrete over the life of the loans through interest income with a corresponding reversal of the initial unrealized gain on investments on the acquired SWK loans through their ultimate disposition. The purchase discount allocated to the acquired SWK equity investments (including royalties) will be recognized upon disposition. Assuming no subsequent change to the fair value of the acquired SWK equity
54
Table of Contents
investments and disposition of such investments are at fair value; a realized gain would be recognized with a corresponding reversal of the unrealized gain on investments upon disposition of such royalty and equity securities. Interest income accretion attributable solely to debt investments is included in the income incentive fee calculations and payable to the Adviser.
The pro forma adjustments represent management’s estimates based on information available as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus and do not reflect possible adjustments related to integration activities that have yet to be determined or transaction or other costs following the Mergers that are not expected to have a continuing impact. No adjustments have been made to the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements to reflect potential synergies or cost savings that may result from the business combination.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the actual consolidated financial statements, and related notes thereto, of RWAY and SWK for the periods presented. See “Index to Financial Statements.”
Note 2 - Purchase Price Allocation
Estimated Consideration of the Mergers
The following table summarizes the total purchase price consideration for the Mergers:
|
|
|
Purchase Price Consideration |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cash purchase consideration |
|
|
|
|
Cash purchase price |
|
|
$ |
165,819 |
Parent capital contribution |
|
|
|
9,000 |
Severance expenses |
|
|
|
1,220 |
Transaction expenses |
|
|
|
5,471 |
Total cash purchase consideration |
|
|
|
181,510 |
Equity consideration (1) |
|
|
|
50,580 |
Total purchase price consideration |
|
|
$ |
232,090 |
55
Table of Contents
Purchase Price Allocation
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements reflect accounting adjustments to give effect to the Mergers, including the total purchase price consideration for the Mergers. The total purchase price consideration is estimated based on provisional amounts and the associated purchase accounting adjustments reflected in “Note 4 - Transaction Adjustments” and “Note 5 - Other Transaction Adjustments.” The allocation of the total purchase price consideration to the acquired net assets is based upon the preliminary fair value estimates of the acquired assets. Once the Mergers have been consummated, RWAY will complete a robust valuation exercise that leverages widely accepted income-based, market-based, and/or cost-based valuation methodologies. Actual results may differ materially from the assumptions within the accompanying unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements. While the unaudited pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and assumptions, the purchase price adjustments relating to SWK’s and RWAY’s consolidated financial statements are preliminary and subject to change.
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation, as if the Mergers had been completed on September 30, 2025:
(in thousands) |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
$ |
6,414 |
Interest and fees receivable |
|
|
|
5,581 |
Investments at fair value |
|
|
|
263,483 |
Other assets |
|
|
|
628 |
Total assets |
|
|
$ |
276,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
SWK Notes, net |
|
|
$ |
33,457 |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
|
3,108 |
Total liabilities |
|
|
$ |
36,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
|
$ |
239,541 |
A day one unrealized gain of $7.5 million will be recognized for the difference by which the estimated fair value of net assets acquired will exceed total purchase price consideration. This unrealized gain will be allocated to the cost basis of the acquired investments based on their respective fair values. See below table for the calculation:
(in thousands) |
|
|
Excess Of Acquired Net Assets Over Total Purchase Price Consideration |
|
Fair value of net assets acquired |
|
|
$ |
239,541 |
Total purchase price consideration |
|
|
|
232,090 |
Purchase discount (unrealized gain on investments) |
|
|
$ |
7,451 |
56
Table of Contents
Note 3 - Reclassification Adjustments
During the preparation of the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements, management performed a preliminary analysis of SWK’s financial information to identify differences in presentation of SWK’s financial statement captions as compared to the presentation of those captions in RWAY’s financial statements. Reclassifications have been made to conform SWK’s actual consolidated financial information presentation to RWAY’s financial statement presentation.
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
Actual |
||
(in thousands) |
|
SWK |
|
Reclassification Adjustments |
|
SWK As Reclassified |
|||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
10,206 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
10,206 |
Interest and accounts receivable, net |
|
|
5,581 |
|
|
(5,581) |
|
|
- |
Interest and fees receivable |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,581 |
|
|
5,581 |
Finance receivables, net |
|
|
245,396 |
|
|
(245,396) |
(i) |
|
- |
Marketable investments |
|
|
275 |
|
|
(275) |
(i) |
|
- |
Warrant assets |
|
|
7,599 |
|
|
(7,599) |
(i) |
|
- |
Non-control/non-affiliate investments at fair value |
|
|
- |
|
|
253,270 |
|
|
253,270 |
Other current assets |
|
|
543 |
|
|
(543) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
19,330 |
|
|
(19,330) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Other non-current assets |
|
|
432 |
|
|
(432) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Other assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
20,305 |
|
|
20,305 |
Total assets |
|
|
289,362 |
|
|
- |
|
|
289,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured senior notes, net |
|
|
31,921 |
|
|
(31,921) |
|
|
- |
SWK Notes, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
31,921 |
|
|
31,921 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
(2,874) |
(iii) |
|
- |
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
361 |
|
|
(361) |
(iii) |
|
- |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,235 |
|
|
3,235 |
Total liabilities |
|
|
35,156 |
|
|
- |
|
|
35,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
12 |
|
|
(12) |
|
|
- |
Common stock, par value |
|
|
- |
|
|
12 |
|
|
12 |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
4,417,730 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,417,730 |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(4,163,536) |
|
|
4,163,536 |
|
|
- |
Accumulated undistributed (overdistributed) earnings |
|
|
- |
|
|
(4,163,536) |
|
|
(4,163,536) |
Total net assets |
|
$ |
254,206 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
254,206 |
57
Table of Contents
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
Actual |
||
(in thousands) |
|
SWK |
|
Reclassification Adjustments |
|
SWK As Reclassified |
|||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivable interest income, including fees |
|
$ |
30,077 |
|
$ |
(30,077) |
|
$ |
- |
Interest income |
|
|
- |
|
|
30,077 |
|
|
30,077 |
Pharmaceutical development |
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
(2,155) |
(i) |
|
- |
Other |
|
|
534 |
|
|
(534) |
(i) |
|
- |
Other income |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
2,689 |
Total investment income |
|
|
32,766 |
|
|
- |
|
|
32,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,464 |
|
|
(3,464) |
|
|
- |
Interest and other debt financing expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,464 |
|
|
3,464 |
Provision (benefit) for credit losses |
|
|
(1,635) |
|
|
1,635 |
(ii) |
|
- |
Loss on impairment of intangibles assets |
|
|
209 |
|
|
(209) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Loss on disposal of inventory |
|
|
314 |
|
|
(314) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Pharmaceutical manufacturing, research and development expense |
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
(1,550) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
40 |
|
|
(40) |
(ii) |
|
- |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
9,406 |
|
|
(9,406) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Other expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
9,884 |
|
|
9,884 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
4,220 |
|
|
(4,220) |
|
|
- |
Tax expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,220 |
|
|
4,220 |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
17,568 |
|
|
- |
|
|
17,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction gains (losses) |
|
|
(113) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
- |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts and foreign currency transactions |
|
|
- |
|
|
(113) |
|
|
(113) |
Unrealized net gain on warrant assets |
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
(2,563) |
(iii) |
|
- |
Net loss on marketable investments |
|
|
(314) |
|
|
314 |
(iii) |
|
- |
Non-control/non-affiliate investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
2,249 |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
(82) |
|
|
82 |
(iv) |
|
- |
Gain on sale of business |
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
(1,601) |
(iv) |
|
- |
Realized gain on early payment of finance receivable |
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
(1,729) |
(iv) |
|
- |
Gain (loss) on revaluation of finance receivables |
|
|
(3,727) |
|
|
3,727 |
(iv) |
|
- |
Non-control/non-affiliate investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
(479) |
|
|
(479) |
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
|
(479) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(479) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
|
$ |
16,855 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
16,855 |
58
Table of Contents
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
Actual |
||
(in thousands) |
|
SWK |
|
Reclassification Adjustments |
|
SWK As Reclassified |
|||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivable interest income, including fees |
|
$ |
40,787 |
|
$ |
(40,787) |
|
$ |
- |
Interest income |
|
|
- |
|
|
40,787 |
|
|
40,787 |
Pharmaceutical development |
|
|
3,616 |
|
|
(3,616) |
(i) |
|
- |
Other |
|
|
584 |
|
|
(584) |
(i) |
|
- |
Other income |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
4,200 |
Total investment income |
|
|
44,987 |
|
|
- |
|
|
44,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,685 |
|
|
(4,685) |
|
|
- |
Interest and other debt financing expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,685 |
|
|
4,685 |
Loss on impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
5,771 |
|
|
(5,771) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
12,756 |
|
|
(12,756) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Pharmaceutical manufacturing, research and development expense |
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
(2,203) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
(1,399) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Change in fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration |
|
|
(4,900) |
|
|
4,900 |
(ii) |
|
- |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
11,487 |
|
|
(11,487) |
(ii) |
|
- |
Other expenses |
|
|
- |
|
|
28,716 |
|
|
28,716 |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
(4,884) |
|
|
- |
Tax expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
4,884 |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
38,285 |
|
|
- |
|
|
38,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction gains |
|
|
641 |
|
|
(641) |
|
|
- |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts and foreign currency transactions |
|
|
- |
|
|
641 |
|
|
641 |
Unrealized net gain (loss) on warrants |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
(2,406) |
(iii) |
|
- |
Gain on revaluation of finance receivable |
|
|
2,495 |
|
|
(2,495) |
(iii) |
|
- |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on non-control/non-affiliate investments, including U.S. Treasury Bills |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,901 |
|
|
4,901 |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on exercise and cancellation of warrants |
|
|
445 |
|
|
(445) |
(iv) |
|
- |
Net loss on marketable investments |
|
|
(266) |
|
|
266 |
(iv) |
|
- |
Realized gain on early payment of finance receivable |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
(1,065) |
(iv) |
|
- |
Net realized gain (loss) on non-control/non-affiliate investments, including U.S. Treasury Bills |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
1,244 |
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
|
$ |
13,488 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
13,488 |
59
Table of Contents
Note 4 - Transaction Adjustments
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
The following summarizes the transaction adjustments to give effect as if the Mergers had been completed on September 30, 2025 for the purposes of the unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The following table summarizes the adjustments to fair value for each asset class:
|
|
As of September 30, 2025 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Debt investments |
$ |
3,988 |
Royalty investments |
|
634 |
Equity investments |
|
5,591 |
Pro forma adjustment to Non-control/non-affiliate investments |
$ |
10,213 |
|
|
As of September 30, 2025 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Parent capital contribution |
$ |
9,000 |
Cash purchase consideration |
|
(181,510) |
Pro forma adjustment to Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
(172,510) |
As a component of the Mergers, the Adviser has agreed to pay an aggregate of $9.0 million in cash to SWK stockholders. For accounting purposes, this Adviser-paid portion of the consideration is treated as a capital contribution to RWAY. The remainder of cash paid for the purchase price is funded through a draw down on RWAY’s credit facility.
The following table summarizes the write-off adjustment for each asset class:
|
|
As of September 30, 2025 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Deferred tax asset |
$ |
(19,330) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
(347) |
Pro forma adjustment to Other assets |
$ |
(19,677) |
The pro forma adjustment eliminates the acquired deferred tax assets, as RWAY, due to its election to be treated as a RIC, will not be able to realize the benefit of this asset. Additionally, debt issuance costs related to SWK’s credit facility were eliminated, as this credit facility will be terminated as a closing condition of the Mergers.
The following table summarizes the adjustment for each liability class:
|
|
As of September 30, 2025 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Long term contra-tax liability |
$ |
118 |
Severance liability |
|
1,220 |
Transaction costs payable |
|
2,327 |
Pro forma adjustment to Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
$ |
3,665 |
60
Table of Contents
|
|
As of September 30, 2025 |
||||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||||
|
|
Common stock, par value |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
Accumulated undistributed (overdistributed) earnings |
Elimination of total historical equity of SWK |
$ |
(12) |
|
$ |
(4,417,730) |
|
$ |
4,163,536 |
Issuance of shares of RWAY Common Stock |
|
57 |
|
|
50,523 |
|
|
- |
Parent capital contribution |
|
- |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
- |
Purchase discount recognized as day 1 unrealized gain |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
7,451 |
Pro forma adjustment to Net assets |
$ |
45 |
|
$ |
(4,358,207) |
|
$ |
4,170,987 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations
The following summarizes the transaction adjustments to give effect as if the Mergers had been completed on January 1, 2024 for the purposes of the unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of Operations.
61
Table of Contents
Note 5 – Other Transaction Adjustments
In addition to the Transaction Adjustments discussed in “Note 4 - Transaction Adjustments,” the pro forma consolidated financial statements include “Other Transaction Adjustments” to reflect the financial impact of events that are required to be completed as conditions precedent to the closing of the Mergers. These adjustments consist of the termination of all SWK employees and the settlement of SWK’s existing credit facilities. These actions are necessary for RWAY to remain in compliance with certain contractual obligations within the RWAY Investment Advisory Agreement, and existing debt covenants. Management has presented these items as separate adjustments under Rule 11-01(a)(8) of Regulation S-X, as they represent material transactions that must occur prior to close in order for RWAY to be able to acquire SWK, and their financial impact is therefore essential for investors to understand the pro forma financial position of the consolidated company.
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
|
|
As of September 30, 2025 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Employee compensation liabilities |
$ |
(1,465) |
Transaction costs payable |
|
(2,327) |
Pro forma adjustment to Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
$ |
(3,792) |
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2025 |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2024 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Compensation expense |
$ |
(3,072) |
|
$ |
(3,305) |
SWK transaction costs |
|
- |
|
|
2,327 |
Pro forma adjustment to Other expenses |
$ |
(3,072) |
|
$ |
(978) |
The adjustment to compensation expense was to eliminate SWK’s historical employee compensation expense, as these costs are not expected to be incurred by the Combined Company. The termination of SWK employees was a required condition to the closing of the Mergers; therefore, the associated compensation expense has been removed from the Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Note 6 - Financing Adjustments
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Consolidated Statements of Operations
62
Table of Contents
Note 7 – Asset Sale Adjustments
Sale of MOD3 Pharma Inc. and Royalty Investments
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2025 |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2024 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Interest income |
$ |
(2,543) |
|
$ |
(8,855) |
Other income |
|
(2,269) |
|
|
(3,647) |
Other expenses |
|
(3,122) |
|
|
(7,365) |
Reversal of SWK realized gain |
|
(996) |
|
|
- |
Note 8 – Management Adjustments
In addition to the pro forma adjustments presented in Notes 4 through 7, RWAY has included the following adjustments to reflect reasonably estimable synergies that are expected to result from the Mergers. These “Management’s Adjustments,” as defined by Rule 11-02(a)(7) of Regulation S-X, are presented for illustrative purposes and are based on cost savings the Combined Company expects to achieve by terminating or subleasing SWK’s historical operating lease. While the Merger Agreement stipulates that SWK will use its reasonable best efforts to facilitate the lease terminations prior to close, this action is not a condition precedent to the consummation of the Mergers. As these actions are not contractually required to close the transaction, the resulting financial impact is presented as a Management Adjustment. The pro forma financial information reflects all management’s adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the pro forma financial information presented. See the below tables for the cost savings related to termination of SWK’s leases for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and for the year ended December 31, 2024.
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 |
|||||||
|
|
|
Pro Forma RWAY |
|
|
Management's Adjustment |
|
|
Pro Forma RWAY |
Other expenses |
|
$ |
6,354 |
|
$ |
(260) |
|
$ |
6,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
|
$ |
40,101 |
|
$ |
260 |
|
$ |
40,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income per common share (basic and diluted) |
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
1.27 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per common share (basic and diluted) |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.95 |
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic and diluted) |
|
|
42,539,339 |
|
|
- |
|
|
42,539,339 |
63
Table of Contents
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2024 |
|||||||
|
|
|
Pro Forma RWAY |
|
|
Management's Adjustment |
|
|
Pro Forma RWAY |
Other expenses |
|
$ |
8,743 |
|
$ |
(422) |
|
$ |
8,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
|
$ |
90,856 |
|
$ |
422 |
|
$ |
91,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income per common share (basic and diluted) |
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
1.55 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per common share (basic and diluted) |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
2.05 |
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic and diluted) |
|
|
44,503,642 |
|
|
- |
|
|
44,503,642 |
64
Table of Contents
THE SWK SPECIAL MEETING
Date, Time and Place of the SWK Special Meeting
The SWK Special Meeting will be held virtually on March 31, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, at meetnow.global/MAFJD7K. This proxy statement/prospectus and the accompanying materials are being mailed on or about March 3, 2026 to stockholders of record of SWK and are available at www.investorvote.com/SWKH.
Purpose of the SWK Special Meeting
At the SWK Special Meeting, SWK Stockholders will be asked to approve (i) the Merger Proposal, (ii) the Compensation Proposal, (iii) the Director Compensation Proposal and (iv) the Adjournment Proposal.
After careful consideration, the SWK Board unanimously approved, adopted and determined advisable the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger), and unanimously recommends that SWK Stockholders vote “FOR” each of the Proposals.
Record Date
The SWK Record Date is the close of business on March 2, 2026. The SWK Record Date was established by the SWK Board, and only holders of record of shares of SWK Common Stock on the SWK Record Date are entitled to receive notice of the SWK Special Meeting and vote at the SWK Special Meeting. As of the SWK Record Date, there were 12,095,906 shares of SWK Common Stock and zero shares of SWK Preferred Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.
Quorum
For SWK to conduct business at the SWK Special Meeting, a quorum of SWK Stockholders must be present. The holders of at least a majority of the voting power of all shares of SWK Common Stock entitled to vote at the meeting must be present at the SWK Special Meeting, virtually or represented by proxy, to constitute a quorum for the SWK Special Meeting.
Vote Required
Each share of SWK Common Stock held by a holder of record as of the SWK Record Date (i.e., March 2, 2026) has one vote on each matter to be considered at the SWK Special Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
The Merger Proposal
The affirmative vote of the holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of the outstanding shares of SWK Common Stock entitled to vote at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Merger Proposal.
Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Merger Proposal, although abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the shares of SWK Common Stock will be voted “FOR” the Merger Proposal.
The Compensation Proposal
The affirmative vote of the holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of all votes properly cast at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Compensation Proposal.
Abstentions will have no effect on the voting outcome of the Compensation Proposal, although abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the shares of the SWK Common Stock will be voted “FOR” the Compensation Proposal.
65
Table of Contents
The Director Compensation Proposal
The affirmative vote of the holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of all votes properly cast at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Director Compensation Proposal.
Abstentions will have no effect on the voting outcome of the Director Compensation Proposal, although abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the shares of the SWK Common Stock will be voted “FOR” the Director Compensation Proposal.
The Adjournment Proposal
The affirmative vote of the holders of SWK Common Stock representing a majority of all the votes properly cast at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Adjournment Proposal.
Abstentions will have no effect on the voting outcome of the Adjournment Proposal, although abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the shares of SWK Common Stock will be voted “FOR” the Adjournment Proposal.
Voting of Management
On the SWK Record Date, SWK’s executive officers and directors owned and were entitled to vote approximately 176,261 shares of SWK Common Stock, representing approximately 1.46% of the outstanding shares of SWK Common Stock on the SWK Record Date. None of SWK’s executive officers or directors has entered into any voting agreement relating to the Mergers.
Voting of Proxies
SWK encourages SWK Stockholders to vote their shares, either by voting at the SWK Special Meeting or by authorizing a proxy to vote their shares, which means that SWK Stockholders authorize someone else to vote their shares. Shares represented by duly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with the applicable SWK Stockholder’s instructions. If a SWK Stockholder executes a proxy without specifying its voting instructions, such SWK Stockholder’s shares will be votes “FOR” each of the Proposals.
A record holder of SWK Common Stock may also authorize a proxy by telephone or through the Internet by using the toll-free telephone numbers or web address printed on your proxy card. Authorizing a proxy by telephone or through the Internet requires you to input the control number located on your proxy card. After inputting the control number, you will be prompted to direct your proxy to vote on the Proposals. You will have an opportunity to review your directions and make any necessary changes before submitting your directions and terminating the telephone call or Internet link.
Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the SWK Special Meeting. The proxy statement/prospectus and the proxy card are available at www.investorvote.com/SWKH.
Revocability of Proxies
You may revoke your proxy and change your vote by giving notice at any time before your proxy is exercised. A revocation may be effected by resubmitting voting instructions via the Internet voting site, by telephone, by obtaining and properly completing another proxy card that is dated later than the original proxy card and returning it, by mail, in time to be received before the SWK Special Meeting, by attending the SWK Special Meeting and voting in person, or by a notice, provided in writing and signed by you, delivered to SWK’s Secretary on any business day before the date of the SWK Special Meeting.
Solicitation of Proxies
SWK will bear the cost of the solicitation of proxies. SWK has not retained a solicitor for these purposes. For more information regarding expenses related to the Mergers, see the section entitled “Questions and Answers about the Mergers – Who is responsible for paying the expenses relating to completing the Mergers?”
66
Table of Contents
Appraisal Rights
Subject to the closing of the First Merger, SWK Stockholders who do not vote in favor of the Merger Proposal and otherwise comply with the procedures and satisfy the conditions set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL are entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL. Failure to follow exactly the procedures specified under Section 262 of the DGCL will result in the loss of appraisal rights. Because of the complexity of the DGCL relating to appraisal rights, if you are considering exercising your appraisal rights, we encourage you to seek the advice of your own legal counsel. See the section entitled “The Mergers — Appraisal Rights” of this proxy statement/prospectus.
67
Table of Contents
THE MERGERS
The discussion in this proxy statement/prospectus, which includes the material terms of the Mergers and the principal terms of the Merger Agreement, is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus.
General Description of the Mergers
The Mergers will result in the combination by merger of RWAY and SWK, with RWAY as the surviving company and the accounting survivor. The proposed reorganization will occur in three separate transactions. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, as of the Effective Time, SWK will merge with and into Acquisition Sub, with Acquisition Sub surviving the First Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediary Sub (i.e., the First Merger). Immediately following the Effective Time, Acquisition Sub will merge with and into Intermediary Sub (i.e., the Second Merger). Intermediary Sub will be the surviving company in the Second Merger and will continue its existence as a corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of RWAY. As of the Second Effective Time, the separate existence of Acquisition Sub will cease. Immediately following the Second Effective Time, Intermediary Sub will be merged with and into RWAY (i.e., the Third Merger). RWAY will be the surviving company in the Third Merger and the accounting survivor and will continue its existence as a corporation under the laws of the State of Maryland. At such time, the separate existence of Intermediary Sub will cease. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement), each share of SWK Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than shares owned by RWAY or any of its consolidated subsidiaries, including Intermediary Sub and Acquisition Sub) will be converted, at the election of the respective SWK Stockholder, into the right to receive the Per Share Stock Consideration or the Per Share Cash Consideration. SWK has no preferred stock outstanding, and no preferred stock will be issued by RWAY as a result of the First Merger. In addition to the Per Share Merger Consideration, SWK Stockholders will receive the Per Share Guaranteed Cash Payment.
Based on the number of shares of RWAY Common Stock and shares of SWK Common Stock issued and outstanding and the NAVs of RWAY and SWK as of September 30, 2025, RWAY would issue approximately 5.7 million shares of RWAY Common Stock to SWK Stockholders in the aggregate in the First Merger, resulting in pro forma ownership of approximately 86.5% for current RWAY Stockholders and approximately 13.5% for current SWK Stockholders. Note, SWK’s NAV as of September 30, 2025 does not reflect the fair value adjustments to SWK’s investments required to determine the “Closing SWK Net Asset Value” as defined herein.
Following the Mergers, RWAY will continue to be advised by the Adviser and will have the same investment objectives and strategies as it had before the Mergers.
Background of the Mergers
The following chronology summarizes the negotiations, material contacts and other material events that led to the signing of the Merger Agreement. The following chronology does not purport to catalogue every conversation among the SWK Board or the representatives of SWK, RWAY or other parties.
As part of SWK’s ongoing consideration and evaluation of its long-term strategic goals and plans, the SWK Board and SWK’s management have periodically reviewed, considered and assessed SWK’s business, operations, financial performance and prospects, as well as SWK’s tax strategy and overall industry conditions, as factors that may affect those strategic goals and plans. This review at times has included, among other things, the consideration of potential opportunities for business combinations, acquisitions and other financial and strategic alternatives to enhance stockholder value.
As part of that review and the ongoing evaluation of business opportunities, the SWK Board has periodically and separately considered and engaged in discussions concerning feasible strategic options for its Pharmaceutical Development and Finance Receivables business segments, including potential mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures and other similar transactions as well as a potential long-term strategic winddown of SWK’s operations. These discussions periodically included introductions to potential strategic counterparties made by the Carlson Funds. Prior to the first quarter of 2024, these discussions did not progress beyond initial exploratory meetings.
During the first quarter of 2024, SWK’s senior management engaged in periodic discussions with representatives of a privately held investment management firm referred to herein as “Party A,” as well as a private equity firm specializing in alternative credit investments referred to herein as “Party B,” each of which was first introduced to SWK by the Carlson Funds and had expressed interest in a potential acquisition of substantially all of SWK’s Finance Receivables business segment. During this period, SWK entered into confidentiality agreements with Party A and Party B and exchanged confidential information of SWK. Only the confidentiality agreement with Party A contained a standstill provision, which expired on February 16, 2025.
68
Table of Contents
In March of 2024, SWK announced that it had entered into an Option and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Option”) with a strategic partner which granted the strategic partner an exclusive option to acquire substantially all of the assets of SWK’s Pharmaceutical Development segment. The Option was exercisable at any time before January 1, 2026.
Beginning in April of 2024, at the direction of the SWK Board and in light of SWK’s ongoing discussions with Party A and Party B, SWK senior management engaged in discussions with representatives of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (“KBW”) as well as representatives of two other nationally recognized investment banking firms concerning a potential engagement as SWK’s financial advisor to provide financial advisory and investment banking services to SWK and the SWK Board, including specifically in connection with a potential transaction involving the Finance Receivables business.
On May 7, 2024, the SWK Board held a meeting at which representatives of KBW and members of SWK senior management were present by invitation. At this meeting, the SWK Board received information from representatives of KBW concerning KBW’s qualifications and its potential engagement.
Throughout the second quarter of 2024, members of SWK senior management engaged regularly in discussions with each of Party A and Party B regarding the potential financial terms on which the SWK Board might consider a sale of SWK’s Finance Receivables business. During this period, the SWK Board met regularly with SWK senior management and representatives of its outside legal counsel, Goodwin Procter LLP (“Goodwin”), to discuss the status of due diligence activities by Party A and Party B and the potential valuations for the Finance Receivables business implied by these ongoing discussions, which initial valuations ranged from approximately 84% to 90% of the GAAP asset value of SWK’s Finance Receivables portfolio plus certain contingent consideration based on the credit performance of the portfolio following the closing of a potential transaction.
On July 10, 2024, the SWK Board held a virtual special meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin were present by invitation. At the meeting, the SWK Board discussed the potential engagement by SWK of a financial advisor as part of SWK’s formal process to evaluate potential strategic alternatives available to SWK and its Finance Receivables portfolio, including management’s and the SWK Board’s evaluation of KBW and the other financial advisors interviewed by SWK senior management. The representatives of Goodwin discussed with the members of the SWK Board their fiduciary duties under Delaware law in connection with a strategic alternatives review process and potential or perceived conflicts that could be applicable to members of the SWK Board or significant shareholders. The SWK Board discussed, among other things, examples of perceived conflicts of interest, including if any members of the SWK Board or significant stockholders of SWK (i) had any agreements, arrangements or understandings with any potential buyers with respect to a potential acquisition of SWK or substantially all of its businesses or assets, (ii) had an immediate need for liquidity that was a significant factor in their support for a potential sale process in the near term, (iii) were interested in acquiring SWK, either alone or with a consortium, (iv) intended to seek differential treatment of some or all of their respective stakes in a transaction relative to SWK’s public stockholders, or (v) intended to seek any non-ratable benefit in a potential transaction relative to SWK’s public stockholders. The SWK Board discussed the importance of identifying any potential conflicts or the appearance of potential conflicts of interest with respect to the members of the SWK Board, and requested that members of the SWK Board identify any such conflicts to the extent they arise at any point throughout the strategic process. The SWK Board identified no conflicts at that time. The SWK Board also stated its expectation that no members of the SWK Board or SWK management would enter into discussions or negotiations with any potential buyer regarding differential treatment or non-ratable benefits for the Carlson Funds in connection with a potential transaction. The SWK Board then discussed the engagement of KBW as SWK’s financial advisor in connection with a potential strategic transaction, noting KBW’s familiarity with, knowledge of and relationships in the industry in which SWK’s Finance Receivables business operates and experience with advising companies in connection with potential strategic transactions. On the basis of these considerations, the SWK Board authorized the engagement of KBW as SWK’s financial advisor in connection with the potential transaction.
On July 31, 2024, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. At this meeting, the participants discussed the status of ongoing discussions with Party A and Party B. The SWK Board determined that it was advisable to commence a broader market outreach to assess interest in a potential strategic transaction involving SWK and/or its Finance Receivables business and directed management to work with KBW to begin outreach to strategic parties in accordance with the timing and process discussed at the meeting.
At the direction of the SWK Board, throughout August and September of 2024, representatives of KBW contacted 38 potential strategic partners to solicit interest in a potential transaction involving SWK and/or its Finance Receivables business. Of the 38 potential buyers contacted by KBW during this period, 23 parties (including a publicly traded BDC referred to herein as “Party C,” an external investment manager referred to herein as “Party D” and RWAY) executed customary confidentiality agreements with SWK, 12 of which included customary standstill provisions, of which all such provisions permitted the potential buyers to make a confidential proposal to SWK and all of such customary standstill provisions terminated prior to SWK’s announcement of the transaction with RWAY. Of these 23 parties, (i) nine potential buyers engaged in substantive initial discussions with KBW and/or SWK management concerning the potential opportunity, during which the participants discussed publicly available information regarding SWK’s business, (ii) four such parties
69
Table of Contents
received access to SWK’s virtual data room and (iii) two of such parties engaged in further discussions with representatives of KBW and/or SWK management during which such participants discussed confidential information regarding SWK’s business.
On August 6, 2024, Party B submitted a written proposal to acquire substantially all of the assets of SWK’s Finance Receivables business for an aggregate cash purchase price equivalent to 89% of the GAAP asset value of Finance Receivables portfolio assets, plus an earnout equal to 11% of GAAP asset value, subject to adjustment for asset write-offs and write-downs within a certain period of time following the closing of the proposed transaction. SWK management estimated Party B’s offer to be equivalent to a value of approximately $18.70 per share of SWK Common Stock based on the GAAP value of the Finance Receivables portfolio as of June 30, 2024. Party B’s August 6 proposal was subject to Party B obtaining equity and debt financing commitments prior to executing a definitive agreement with respect to a proposed transaction.
On August 12, 2024, Party A submitted an offer to acquire substantially all of SWK’s Finance Receivables business for, at SWK’s option, either (i) an aggregate cash purchase price equivalent to approximately 87% of the GAAP asset value of Finance Receivables portfolio assets, plus an additional 13% percent of GAAP asset value, contingent upon the performance of certain credit receivables following the closing of the proposed transaction or (ii) an aggregate cash purchase price equivalent to 90.5% of GAAP asset value. SWK management estimated the two options presented in Party A’s offer to be equivalent to a value of approximately $18.78 per share of SWK Common Stock and $17.59 per share of SWK Common Stock, respectively, based on the GAAP value of the Finance Receivables portfolio as of June 30, 2024. These assumptions factored in the net present value of the proposed contingent consideration of option (i) as well as certain adjustments related to SWK’s indebtedness and other liabilities and receivables. Party A’s August 12 proposal also noted that the offer would be subject to equity and debt financing contingencies.
On August 13, 2024, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. Joseph D. Staggs, SWK’s Chief Executive Officer, and representatives of KBW provided an overview of the August 12 proposal received from Party A and the August 6 proposal received from Party B. Representatives of Goodwin then provided a summary of legal considerations in respect of both offers, including provisions around closing certainty, exclusivity and the fiduciary duties of the SWK Board in evaluating the proposals.
On August 14, 2024, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. At the meeting, representatives of KBW provided an update regarding the status of outreach to other potential counterparties. The SWK Board also continued to discuss the characteristics of the August 12 proposal received from Party A and the August 6 proposal received from Party B, including the type and value of consideration proposed, the amount of diligence the parties still needed to complete and expecting financing and other contingencies.
On August 28, 2024, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. At the meeting, representatives of KBW provided a further update regarding the status of outreach to other potential counterparties. The SWK Board then discussed the August 12 proposal received from Party A and the August 6 proposal received from Party B. The SWK Board weighed the relative financial terms of the proposals as well as the likely conditions related to the consummation of such proposals and the SWK Board’s belief, after consultation with SWK senior management and representatives of KBW, that neither Party A nor Party B was likely to submit an improved proposal for the SWK Board’s consideration that would generate the support of the SWK Board. Following discussion, the SWK Board directed KBW to proceed with distributing a process letter to potential parties that executed a confidentiality agreement.
On September 4, 2024, as directed by the SWK Board, representatives of KBW distributed a process letter to 36 parties, including RWAY, Party C and Party D, which requested preliminary non-binding proposals for a potential strategic transaction involving SWK and/or its Finance Receivables business no later than September 26, 2025.
During the subsequent weeks, various parties who had received a process letter from KBW, including RWAY, Party C and Party D, received due diligence information and engaged in discussions with representatives of KBW and members of SWK senior management. Financial terms concerning a potential transaction involving SWK and/or its Finance Receivables business were not discussed during any of these meetings.
On September 26, 2024, Party C submitted an initial indication of interest to acquire 100% of the outstanding equity interests of SWK via reverse triangular merger on a cash- and net asset value (NAV)-for-NAV basis, net of SWK’s transaction expenses, with approximately 40% of the merger consideration proposed to be in cash and approximately 60% in the form of shares of Party C’s common stock. The September 26 offer by Party C was estimated by SWK senior management to be valued at approximately 92% of SWK’s GAAP asset value for the Finance Receivable portfolio assets, which management estimated to be equivalent to approximately $19.29 per share of SWK Common Stock, based on the proposed adjustments to NAV implied by the terms of Party C’s offer.
70
Table of Contents
Also on September 26, 2024, Party D submitted an initial indication of interest regarding a potential recapitalization transaction whereby SWK would be converted into a registered investment company and Party D would become SWK’s investment advisor. Party D’s proposal was contingent upon SWK obtaining a third party to purchase existing assets of SWK for cash. Party D’s proposal was estimated by SWK senior management to represent a long-term value of approximately $20.62 per share of SWK Common Stock.
On October 1, 2024, Mr. Pennington submitted his resignation from the SWK Board as a result of his departure from his position as a director of the Carlson Funds. Following Mr. Pennington’s resignation, the Carlson Funds declined to exercise their rights to appoint an alternative designee to the SWK Board and the SWK Board thereafter consisted solely of independent directors in accordance with applicable Nasdaq listing standards.
During the following weeks, members of SWK senior management engaged in further due diligence discussions with Party C and its external advisor. During these meetings, the participants did not discuss the reaction of the SWK Board to Party C’s September 26 proposal or other financial terms of a potential transaction between Party C and SWK.
On November 25, 2024, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. At the meeting, representatives of KBW provided an update regarding the status of outreach to other potential counterparties as well as a summary of the key financial and other terms of the proposals received by SWK to date. The SWK Board then discussed in detail proposals received from Party C and Party D. The SWK Board concluded that the proposal received from Party D was not compelling due to the proposed transaction structure, limited near-term value to SWK stockholders and substantial risks to closing certainty implied by the proposal. The SWK Board also considered the proposal submitted by Party C, including in light of Party C’s historical stock performance and the headwinds facing public BDCs in the current market. Following discussion, the SWK Board determined that the proposed transaction with Party C would be more compelling if the cash portion of the proposed merger consideration represented a larger portion of the overall transaction value. The SWK Board then directed KBW and SWK management to provide this feedback to Party C and encourage Party C to make a revised proposal.
On December 2, 2024, Party C submitted a revised proposal to acquire SWK, which reflected an increase in the cash portion of the aggregate merger consideration to 50%, with the remainder payable in the form of shares of Party C common stock.
During the months of December 2024 through February 2025, at the direction of the SWK Board, SWK senior management continued to engage in discussions with Party C regarding a potential strategic transaction between the two parties. The SWK Board also met regularly throughout this period to continue to evaluate a proposed transaction with Party C as well as other strategic alternatives for SWK, including potential divestitures of SWK’s Pharmaceutical Development segment and performing royalty portfolio assets as well as a long-term wind-down and liquidation scenario. Throughout this period, Party C’s share price remained steady.
On March 3, 2025, Party C submitted a revised proposal to acquire SWK, which reflected an increase in the cash portion of the aggregate merger consideration to 55%, with the remainder payable in the form of shares of Party C common stock.
Throughout March 2025, SWK senior management and the SWK Board met regularly to discuss Party C’s March 3 proposal. During this period, SWK senior management also engaged in discussions with the Carlson Funds to gauge its interest in a potential transaction with Party C, in light of its controlling interest in SWK as well as Party C’s expectation that any proposed transaction between the two parties would require a voting and support agreement to be executed by the Carlson Funds simultaneously with the execution of a definitive agreement. At the direction of the SWK Board, representatives of Goodwin also engaged with representatives of Party C’s legal counsel during this period to discuss potential transaction terms and legal considerations in connection with the proposed transaction.
On March 17, 2025, SWK announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to divest its performing royalty portfolio to Soleus Capital in exchange for cash consideration of approximately $34 million. In addition, SWK announced that its royalty financing partner, ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., had exercised its buyout option related to the Iluvien royalty, which resulted in a payment of approximately $17.3 million to SWK.
On March 19, 2025, following SWK’s announcement of its transaction with Soleus Capital, representatives of a global asset management firm referred to herein as “Party E” initiated discussions with SWK management concerning a potential business combination. At the meeting, SWK management confirmed that SWK was in the process of evaluating strategic alternatives and invited Party E to participate in the process.
On April 2, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. The SWK Board considered, among other things, that the value of Party C’s common stock had declined significantly over the past several weeks, which meaningfully lowered the overall value of Party C’s March 3 Proposal to
71
Table of Contents
stockholders, as well as the proposed conditions on which Party C would be prepared to enter into formal negotiations for a definitive agreement, which included a request for exclusivity as well as significant expense reimbursement obligations if SWK declined to proceed with the potential transaction. The aggregate value of Party C’s proposal was estimated by SWK senior management to be approximately $19.74 per share of SWK Common Stock based on the GAAP asset value of the Finance Receivables portfolio was of March 31, 2025; however, the SWK Board and SWK senior management noted that the per-share increase in value from the date of Party C’s August 26 proposal was attributable to growth in SWK’s Finance Receivables portfolio and did not represent incremental transaction value. The SWK Board also discussed the feedback received from the Carlson Funds regarding Party C’s March 3 Proposal, which also cited the decline in Party C’s stock price over the past several weeks. As a result of these discussions, and in view of the SWK Board’s belief based on discussions with Party C over the course of the past several weeks that the March 3 Proposal represented the best offer SWK was reasonably likely to receive from Party C, the SWK Board determined to cease negotiations with Party C concerning a potential transaction between the two parties.
On April 3, 2025, at the direction of the SWK Board, representatives of KBW contacted representatives of the Adviser to discuss whether RWAY would be interested in reengaging in discussions concerning a potential transaction between SWK and RWAY. At the meeting, RWAY representatives indicated they would potentially be interested in reengaging and that any transaction would need to include a sizable stock component.
On April 4, 2025, SWK entered into a mutual confidentiality agreement with Party E. The agreement did not contain a standstill provision.
On April 10, 2025, SWK declared a special cash dividend to SWK stockholders of $4.00 per share.
During the month of April, SWK senior management held preliminary discussions with RWAY and Party E exploring a potential strategic transaction with each party, which discussions did not include discussion of financial terms.
On April 27, 2025, RWAY submitted an initial indication of interest to acquire 100% of the outstanding equity interests of SWK via reverse triangular merger on a cash- and NAV-for-NAV basis, net of SWK’s transaction expenses, with 40% of the merger consideration proposed to be in cash and 60% in the form of shares of RWAY’s common stock. RWAY’s April 27 offer was estimated by SWK senior management to be valued at approximately 85% of SWK’s GAAP asset value for the Finance Receivable portfolio assets as of March 31, 2025, or $14.36 per share of SWK Common Stock ($18.36 per share as adjusted for the $4.00 cash dividend declared in respect of shares of SWK Common Stock), based on the proposed adjustments to NAV implied by the terms of RWAY’s offer.
On May 16, 2025, Party E submitted an initial indication of interest to acquire substantially all of the assets of SWK’s Finance Receivables business for an aggregate cash purchase price ranging from 90 – 95% of the tangible net book value for the performing loans included within the portfolio. Party E’s offer also stated that the non-performing assets included within the portfolio would be valued at between 0 – 50% of the tangible net book value and certain other assets at 100% of the tangible net book value. Party E’s May 16 offer was estimated by SWK senior management to represent between $15.12 and $16.98 per share of SWK Common Stock (between $19.12 and $20.98 per share as adjusted for the $4.00 cash dividend declared in respect of shares of SWK Common Stock), based on the proposed adjustments to NAV implied by the terms of Party E's offer as well as management’s assumptions regarding necessary cash reserves for post-closing liquidation and wind-down activities.
Throughout May and June of 2025, members of SWK senior management and representatives of Party E met regularly to discuss SWK’s Finance Receivables portfolio and other due diligence activities. The financial terms of a potential transaction between SWK and Party E were not discussed at these meetings. During this time, Party B also expressed interest in recommencing due diligence discussions with SWK, with the goal of submitting an improved offer to their proposal made on August 6, 2024.
On May 22, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. During the meeting, the SWK Board discussed the status and potential terms of the proposed transactions with RWAY, Party B and Party E, as well as strategies to maximize stockholder value through continued operations as a going concern or under a long-term winddown and liquidation scenario relative to a strategic third party transaction. Representatives of Goodwin led the SWK Board in a discussion of their fiduciary duties in evaluating the proposals and pursuing a potential strategic transaction.
On June 4, 2025, members of SWK senior management held discussions with representatives of RWAY and the Adviser. These discussions included reference to the fact that the SWK Board was unlikely to accept a proposal that did not include a meaningful increase to the cash portion of the proposed merger consideration and RWAY’s perspective that it was unlikely to be able to improve its offer from the 40% cash / 60% stock terms initially proposed by RWAY in its April 27 proposal.
72
Table of Contents
Throughout the rest of June and the first two weeks of July 2025, RWAY, Party B and Party E continued conducting due diligence activities facilitated by SWK senior management.
On July 15, 2025, SWK announced the closing of the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of SWK’s Pharmaceutical Development segment pursuant to the exercise of the Option in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $7 million.
On July 16, 2025, as a result of an introduction made by a member of the SWK Board, an alternative asset manager referred to herein as “Party F” entered into a mutual confidentiality agreement with SWK, which did not contain a standstill.
On July 17, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management were present by invitation. During the meeting, the SWK Board discussed the status and potential terms of the proposed transactions with RWAY, Party B and Party E, as well as ongoing discussions between management and the Carlson Funds regarding a potential strategic transaction involving SWK.
Later that day, RWAY submitted a revised letter of intent, which included the same financial and other material terms as its April 27 proposal, except that the revised offer increased the cash portion of the proposed merger consideration from 40% to 54% of the overall merger consideration (the “RWAY July 17 Proposal”). The RWAY July 17 Proposal did not include any financing contingency and was estimated by SWK senior management to be valued at approximately 91% of SWK’s GAAP asset value for the Finance Receivable portfolio assets as of June 30, 2025, or $16.84 per share of SWK Common Stock ($20.84 per share as adjusted for the $4.00 cash dividend declared in respect of shares of SWK Common Stock), based on the proposed adjustments to NAV implied by the terms of RWAY’s offer.
Also on July 17, 2025, Party F and members of SWK senior management met to discuss the possibility of Party F exploring a potential strategic transaction with SWK. SWK management agreed to provide Party F with access to SWK’s virtual data room and facilitate preliminary due diligence, but noted that SWK was in advanced discussions with two alternative parties concerning a potential strategic transaction.
On July 21, 2025, Mr. Staggs and representatives of KBW met with representatives of Party E to provide them with an update on the status of SWK’s strategic process. As part of this discussion, Party E was notified that SWK’s sales process was competitive and encouraged to submit an updated bid promptly.
On July 23, 2025, Mr. Staggs met with a senior representative of Party E. At the meeting, the Party E representative outlined the financial terms of a revised bid that Party E intended to submit to SWK. Later that day, Party E submitted the revised bid to acquire substantially all of the assets of SWK’s Finance Receivables portfolio as discussed with Mr. Staggs earlier that day (the “Party E July 23 Proposal”), which reflected an aggregate cash purchase price based on core asset valuations ranging between 23.4% of the tangible net book value for non-performing loans included within the portfolio to 93.5% of the tangible net book value for performing loans included within the portfolio. The Party E July 23 Proposal did not include any financing contingency and was estimated by SWK senior management to represent approximately $15.86 per share of SWK Common Stock ($19.98 per share as adjusted for the $4.00 cash dividend declared in respect of shares of SWK Common Stock), based on the proposed adjustments to NAV implied by the terms of Party E's offer as well as management’s assumptions regarding necessary cash reserves for post-closing liquidation and wind-down activities. At this time, Party E also requested that SWK enter into exclusivity with Party E and delivered a draft exclusivity agreement for SWK’s review.
On July 24, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. During the meeting, Mr. Staggs and representatives of KBW provided the SWK Board with an update on the status of the ongoing discussions with RWAY, Party B and Party E. Representatives of KBW indicated that an updated letter of intent from Party B was expected to arrive within the next several days.
On July 25, 2025, Party B submitted a revised non-binding letter of intent to acquire substantially all of the assets of SWK’s Finance Receivables business for an aggregate cash purchase price equivalent to 92.5% of the GAAP asset value of Finance Receivables portfolio assets (the “Party B July 25 Proposal”). The Party B July 25 Proposal was estimated by SWK senior management to be valued at $16.91 per share of SWK Common Stock ($20.91 per share as adjusted for the $4.00 cash dividend declared in respect of shares of SWK Common Stock), based on the proposed adjustments to GAAP asset value implied by the terms of Party B’s offer. The Party B July 25 Proposal was contingent upon Party B obtaining debt and equity financing for approximately 98% of the aggregate purchase price prior to the signing of a definitive agreement with SWK.
On July 29, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. At the meeting, the SWK Board continued to discuss the characteristics of the RWAY July 17 Proposal, the Party E July 23 Proposal and the Party B July 25 Proposal. With respect to the RWAY July 17 Proposal, the SWK Board discussed, among other things, (1) the fact that RWAY’s proposal was not subject to any financing contingency, that its due diligence was
73
Table of Contents
substantially complete and that RWAY would be prepared to enter into a definitive transaction agreement with SWK in the shortest time period relative to Party B and Party E and (2) the SWK Board’s concern that the mix of cash and stock consideration did not represent sufficiently compelling value relative to the Party E July 23 Proposal and the Party B July 25 Proposal due to the fact that SWK stockholders would bear the economic risk of fluctuation in the value of RWAY stock between the signing and closing of the transaction, the risk that the RWAY stock issuance may require a vote of the RWAY stockholders to approve the transaction, and the regulatory considerations around RWAY’s status as a BDC (the “RWAY July 17 Proposal Considerations”). With respect to the Party B July 25 Proposal, the SWK Board discussed, among other things, (1) the heightened execution risk of the Party B July 25 Proposal given the fact that Party B’s debt financing provider had not yet commenced due diligence and Party B would require a written commitment from its debt financing partner before proceeding to execute a definitive agreement with SWK and (2) the SWK Board’s expectation that if Party B could not obtain the debt and equity financing needed to consummate the transaction, SWK’s only recourse pursuant to the potential transaction agreement with Party B would be to receive a termination fee (the “Party B July 25 Proposal Considerations”). With respect to the Party E July 23 Proposal, the SWK Board discussed, among other things, (1) the fact that the Party E July 23 Proposal represented higher certainty of value than the RWAY July 17 Proposal given the RWAY July 17 Proposal’s contemplated mix of cash and stock consideration and RWAY’s status as a BDC and (2) the fact that the Party E July 23 Proposal provided significantly greater execution certainty than the Party B July 25 Proposal given Party E’s advanced stage of due diligence and lack of financing contingency (the “Party E July 23 Proposal Considerations”). The SWK Board also discussed (1) the SWK Board’s expectation that the prevailing bidder would require a voting and support agreement from the Carlson Funds in connection with the signing of a definitive agreement and that SWK would be expected to enter into exclusivity with the prevailing bidder prior to entering into a definitive agreement with respect to a proposed transaction and (2) the legal and operational complexity introduced by the asset acquisition structure contemplated by the Party B July 25 Proposal and the Party E July 23 Proposal relative to the RWAY July 17 Proposal, in light of the fact that the RWAY July 17 Proposal would not require a post-closing wind-down of SWK’s operations and liabilities and the holdback of any portion of the transaction consideration in order to satisfy any such winddown liabilities and the fact that SWK’s value as a shell company would be difficult to ascertain with certainty (the “Other Considerations”). Representatives of Goodwin then reviewed the fiduciary duties of the SWK Board in evaluating each of the three proposals in light of the RWAY July 17 Proposal Considerations, Party B July 25 Proposal Considerations, the Party E July 23 Proposal Considerations and the Other Considerations.
On July 30, 2025, at the request of the SWK Board, Mr. Staggs met with Mr. Carlson to discuss the RWAY July 17 Proposal, the Party E July 23 Proposal and the Party B July 25 Proposal. At the meeting, Mr. Carlson expressed his view that, when evaluating each of the RWAY July 17 Proposal Considerations, the Party E July 23 Proposal Considerations and the Party B July 25 Proposal Considerations, the Party E July 23 Proposal represented the highest overall value for stockholders.
On August 1, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. At the meeting, the SWK Board continued to review the RWAY July 17 Proposal Considerations, the Party E July 23 Proposal Considerations, the Party B July 25 Proposal Considerations and the Other Considerations and Mr. Staggs provided the SWK Board with an update regarding his conversation with Mr. Carlson. Representatives of KBW also provided an overview of the latest published equity research perspectives on RWAY Common Stock. After discussion, the SWK Board determined that Director Laurie Dotter should engage in discussions directly with Mr. Carlson in order to share perspectives on the RWAY July 17 Proposal Considerations, the Party E July 23 Proposal Considerations, the Party B July 25 Proposal Considerations and the Other Considerations.
On August 4, 2025, the SWK Board held an additional meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation, during which the SWK Board reviewed the matters discussed at the August 1 meeting of the SWK Board and reviewed the current status of each of the proposals.
Later that day, Ms. Dotter and Mr. Carlson met to discuss the RWAY July 17 Proposal, the Party E July 23 Proposal and the Party B July 25 Proposal, during which Mr. Carlson reiterated his views supporting the Party E July 23 Proposal relative to the RWAY July 17 Proposal and the Party B July 25 Proposal.
On August 5, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. At the meeting, Ms. Dotter reviewed the substance of her discussion with Mr. Carlson the previous day and the SWK Board continued to evaluate the RWAY July 17 Proposal Considerations, the Party E July 23 Proposal Considerations, the Party B July 25 Proposal Considerations and the Other Considerations. Following discussion, the SWK Board determined that the Party E July 23 Proposal represented the highest overall value to stockholders in light of the various considerations reviewed by the SWK Board. The SWK Board then directed SWK senior management to notify Party E that SWK was prepared to enter into exclusive negotiations with Party E with respect to the Party E July 23 Proposal and directed representatives of KBW to notify RWAY and Party B of the same.
74
Table of Contents
Later that evening, at the direction of the SWK Board, SWK senior management provided Party E with a markup of Party E’s proposed draft Exclusivity Agreement as well as comments to the term sheet attached to the Party E July 23 Proposal.
Also on the evening of August 5, 2025, representatives of RWAY notified representatives of KBW as well as members of SWK senior management that RWAY was prepared to submit an improved offer within the next 24 hours and requesting that SWK refrain from entering into exclusivity with Party E until the SWK Board had an opportunity to evaluate the revised RWAY proposal. During the course of this evening, at the direction of the SWK Board, representatives of KBW communicated with representatives of Party B that the SWK Board had made a determination to pursue a proposal from a party whose due diligence was substantially complete and would be in a position to sign a definitive agreement substantially more quickly than Party B.
On August 6, 2025, RWAY submitted a revised letter of intent, which include the same financial and other material terms as the RWAY July 17 Proposal except that the revised offer increased the cash portion of the proposed merger consideration to 72% of the overall merger consideration and capped the maximum amount of stock consideration at 19.90% of RWAY’s outstanding capital stock, which would preclude the need for a RWAY stockholder vote to approve the transaction (the “RWAY August 6 Proposal”). At the time of receipt of the RWAY August 6 Proposal, SWK senior management estimated the RWAY August 6 Proposal to be valued at approximately 96% of SWK’s GAAP net asset value for the Finance Receivable portfolio assets as of June 30, 2025, or $17.75 per share of SWK Common Stock ($21.75 per share as adjusted for the $4.00 cash dividend declared in respect of shares of SWK Common Stock), based on the proposed adjustments to NAV implied by the terms of RWAY’s offer. Following receipt of the RWAY August 6 Proposal, at the direction of the SWK Board, representatives of KBW notified representatives of Party E that SWK had received an improved proposal from an alternative bidder and that the SWK Board would need additional time to consider the improved proposal relative to the Party E July 23 Proposal before proceeding with term sheet and exclusivity negotiations with Party E. At this time, representatives of Party E notified representatives of KBW that Party E was unlikely to be able to meaningfully improve the terms of the Party E July 23 Proposal.
On August 7, 2025, at the direction of the SWK Board, Mr. Staggs met with Mr. Carlson to review the terms of the RWAY August 6 Proposal and to evaluate whether the improved cash-and-stock mix implied by the RWAY August 6 Proposal was sufficient to alter Mr. Carlson’s support for the Party E July 23 Proposal. At the meeting, Mr. Carlson conveyed to Mr. Staggs that the Carlson Funds would support the SWK Board’s recommendation as between the RWAY August 6 Proposal and the Party E July 23 Proposal.
Later that day, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. At the meeting, the SWK Board discussed the impact of the improved cash-and-stock mix represented by the RWAY August 6 Proposal on the RWAY July 17 Proposal Considerations, the Party E July 23 Proposal Considerations, the Party B July 25 Proposal Considerations and the Other Considerations, and Mr. Staggs provided the SWK Board with an update concerning his conversation with Mr. Carlson earlier that day. The SWK Board also discussed that based on SWK senior management’s latest estimates, the RWAY August 6 Proposal represented a valuation of $17.75 per share relative to the per-share value of the Party B July 25 Proposal and the Party E July 23 Proposal of $16.59 and $16.31 per share, respectively (or $21.75, $20.59 and $20.31, respectively, as adjusted for the $4.00 cash dividend declared in respect of shares of SWK Common Stock). Following discussion, the SWK Board determined that the improvements represented by the RWAY August 6 Proposal led the SWK Board to conclude that RWAY August 6 Proposal represented the highest overall value to stockholders in light of the various considerations reviewed by the SWK Board. The SWK Board then directed SWK senior management to notify Party E that SWK would be withdrawing from negotiations regarding the terms of an Exclusivity Agreement and term sheet for the Party E July 23 Proposal and authorized SWK senior management to negotiate with RWAY to enter into up to 30 business days of exclusivity with respect to the RWAY August 6 Proposal.
On August 8, 2025, RWAY and SWK entered into an exclusivity agreement providing for a 30 business day exclusivity period, which was due to expire at 11:59 p.m. on September 22, 2025.
Over the next two weeks, members of RWAY and SWK management engage in due diligence discussions concerning the Finance Receivables portfolio and other assets and liabilities of SWK.
On August 22, 2025, representatives of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, legal counsel to RWAY (“STB”) sent an initial draft of the Merger Agreement to representatives of Goodwin. The Merger Agreement provided for an exchange ratio calculation that valued SWK’s NAV after deducting a number of liabilities in addition to SWK’s legal and financial advisory transaction expenses, including the value of SWK’s deferred tax assets, costs associated with calling SWK’s outstanding bonds, liabilities related to the termination of outstanding lease agreements, costs associated with RWAY obtaining a representation and warranty insurance policy, the premium for SWK’s D&O tail insurance policy and cost-sharing with respect to RWAY’s fees and expenses in preparing a registration/proxy statement and making the required U.S. antitrust filing (the “NAV Deductions”). The draft Merger Agreement also included, among other things, (1) a “no-shop” provision requiring SWK to cease solicitation of alternative proposals following the execution of the Merger Agreement, (2) the ability of SWK, under certain circumstances, to negotiate with counterparties in connection with a superior proposal, change its recommendation in support of the Merger Agreement and/or terminate the Merger Agreement in order to accept a superior proposal, (3)
75
Table of Contents
a “force-the-vote” provision requiring SWK to hold a stockholder meeting to approve the proposed transaction with RWAY regardless of whether the SWK Board had changed its recommendation in support of the Merger Agreement, and (4) a termination fee of an unspecified size, payable by SWK under certain circumstances (a “Company Termination Fee”), plus an obligation on the part of SWK to reimburse RWAY for its transaction expenses if SWK stockholder approval is not obtained (a “Parent Expense Reimbursement Obligation”).
On August 27, 2025, the SWK Board held a regularly scheduled meeting of the SWK Board, at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin were present by invitation. In addition to general topics for discussion at the meeting, Mr. Staggs provided the SWK Board with an update on the status of negotiations with RWAY and the material terms of the draft Merger Agreement provided by STB, including SWK management’s initial estimates of the impact of the NAV Deductions on its initial analysis of the overall value of the RWAY August 6 Proposal as well as the other material terms set forth in the proposed draft of the Merger Agreement.
On August 30, 2025, representatives of STB sent an initial draft of the Key Stockholder Agreement to representatives of Goodwin, which provided for, among other things, a commitment on the part of the Carlson Funds to vote their respective shares of SWK Common Stock in favor of the transactions contemplated by the draft Merger Agreement, and against competing transactions unless the Merger Agreement was terminated.
On September 2, 2025, representatives of Goodwin sent a revised draft of the Merger Agreement to representatives of STB, which draft reflected, among other things, (1) the removal of all proposed NAV Deductions as contemplated by STB’s proposed draft Merger Agreement other than deductions to NAV for SWK’s legal and financial advisory expenses; (2) the removal of the “force the vote” provision and (3) a proposed Company Termination Fee of 2% of the transaction equity value and the removal of the Parent Expense Reimbursement Obligation.
On September 4, 2025, after consultation with legal counsel for the Carlson Funds, representatives of Goodwin sent a revised draft of the Key Stockholder Agreement to representatives of STB, which provided for, among other things, the removal of the Carlson Funds’ voting obligation in favor of the proposed Merger Agreement if the SWK Board makes an adverse recommendation change under the Merger Agreement.
On September 8, 2025, representatives of STB sent a revised draft of the Merger Agreement to representatives of Goodwin, which draft reflected, among other things, (1) the reinsertion of the full scope of NAV Deductions proposed by STB’s August 22 draft of the Merger Agreement; (2) the reinsertion of the “force-the-vote” provision; and (3) a Company Termination Fee equal to 3.5% of the transaction equity value.
On September 10, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. At the meeting, members of SWK senior management provided an update concerning the status of discussions and negotiations with RWAY and the key open issues in the draft Merger Agreement.
Over the course of the following week, representatives of Goodwin and members of SWK senior management engaged in discussions with representatives of STB and representatives of RWAY to discuss the open issues presented by STB’s September 8 draft of the Merger Agreement, including the impact to the SWK Board’s assessment of the proposed transaction value based on the proposed NAV Deductions and the parties’ expectations concerning how NAV would be calculated for purposes of determining the final merger consideration. During this period the SWK Board also held a meeting to review the status and progress of such discussions with members of SWK senior management, at which representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation.
On September 18, 2025, representatives of Goodwin sent a revised draft of the Merger Agreement to representatives of STB, which draft reflected, among other things, (1) the removal of all NAV Deductions other than SWK’s legal and financial advisory fees and the cost of procuring a directors’ and officers’ tail insurance policy; (2) the introduction of a lower collar on the value of SWK’s NAV for purposes of determining the final merger consideration, equal to $7 million less than SWK’s GAAP carrying value of its portfolio assets as of the closing of the proposed transaction (the “Lower Collar”); and (3) the removal of the “force-the-vote” provision, which Goodwin indicated would be accompanied by the removal of the separate termination right in the event of an adverse recommendation change by the SWK Board under the Key Stockholder Agreement.
On September 22, 2025, representatives of STB sent a revised draft of the Merger Agreement to representatives of Goodwin, which draft reflected, among other things, (1) acceptance of SWK’s proposed scope of NAV Deductions, subject to the inclusion of SWK’s proxy statement expenses and certain executive severance costs, (2) a commitment on the part of the Adviser, to fund up to $2 million of additional merger consideration in the event that the Lower Collar exceeds SWK’s closing NAV as determined pursuant to the Merger Agreement by more than $2 million, as well as a mutual closing condition that SWK’s closing NAV as determined pursuant to the
76
Table of Contents
Merger Agreement must not be less than the Lower Collar (the “Lower Collar Closing Condition”); (3) the reinsertion of the “force-the-vote” provision; and (4) a “diligence out” provision allowing RWAY to terminate the Merger Agreement if certain due diligence information is not provided to the satisfaction of RWAY prior to the Closing.
In the afternoon of September 22, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. The SWK Board discussed the status of discussions with RWAY and the key issues presented by STB’s September 22 draft of the Merger Agreement in light of the pending expiration of the exclusivity period, which was expected to expire at 11:59 p.m. that evening. The SWK Board authorized SWK senior management to negotiate for one 24-hour extension of the exclusivity period with RWAY if RWAY agreed (1) to remove the “force-the-vote” provision in the Merger Agreement, (2) to exclude any executive severance obligations from the calculation of the NAV Deductions and (3) to remove any “diligence out” termination right in the Merger Agreement. SWK management then met with representatives of RWAY to outline the proposed terms of an exclusivity extension.
Later that day, representatives of RWAY communicated to members of SWK senior management that RWAY was prepared to accept SWK’s positions regarding the Merger Agreement as described earlier in the day, provided that the parties would agree to split certain executive severance obligations and that RWAY would not be in a position to sign the definitive agreement until certain critical due diligence items were resolved.
In the morning of September 23, 2025, at the direction of the SWK Board, SWK and RWAY agreed to an extension of exclusivity for an additional 24 hours, until 11:59 p.m. on September 23, 2025.
Later that evening, representatives of Goodwin sent a revised draft of the Merger Agreement to representatives of STB, which draft reflected, among other things, (i) the removal of the “force-the-vote” provision; (ii) the removal of the “diligence out” termination right under the Merger Agreement and (iii) that the Lower Collar Closing Condition would be a unilateral condition for the benefit of SWK and not for the benefit of RWAY. The exclusivity period expired that evening at 11:59 p.m. and was not extended.
On September 24, 2025, representatives of Goodwin, STB and RWAY, as well as members of SWK senior management, engaged in an “all hands” discussion to resolve the final open items in the Merger Agreement. Later that day, representatives of STB sent a proposed final draft of the Merger Agreement to representatives of Goodwin, which reflected RWAY’s agreement with SWK’s position on the material issues presented by Goodwin’s September 23 draft of the Merger Agreement.
Over the course of the next several days, representatives of Goodwin and representatives of STB exchanged drafts of the Merger Agreement and disclosure letters and members of SWK senior management met regularly with representatives of RWAY to review outstanding due diligence issues.
On September 26, 2025, representatives of RWAY provided Mr. Staggs via email with the proposed terms of a consulting agreement to be entered into between Mr. Staggs and RWAY in connection with the signing of the Merger Agreement. After receipt of the proposal, Mr. Staggs did not engage in further discussions with RWAY concerning the terms of such proposal prior to the signing of the Merger Agreement.
On September 29, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin were present by invitation. The participants discussed the status of RWAY’s due diligence activities, including the anticipated timeline for resolution of critical diligence items, as well as whether discussions with Party E should be reinitiated given the expiration of exclusivity with RWAY and RWAY’s delay in resolving open due diligence issues. The SWK Board also discussed the terms of the consulting agreement received by Mr. Staggs on September 26 and the SWK Board directed Mr. Staggs not to engage in discussions regarding his post-closing employment or service with RWAY until otherwise determined by the SWK Board.
On September 30, 2025, Mr. Staggs met with Mr. Carlson to provide an update concerning the status of the transaction with RWAY. At the meeting, Mr. Carlson expressed interest in exploring whether Party E would be interested in making an updated bid to the Party E July 23 Proposal, in light of RWAY’s delay in resolving open due diligence items and the overall market outlook for BDCs and the private credit market generally.
Later that day, at the direction of the SWK Board, Mr. Staggs and a representative of Party E senior management met to discuss Party E’s interest in potentially re-engaging with SWK with respect to a potential transaction between the parties. The Party E representative expressed interest in submitting an updated proposal.
On October 1, 2025, members of SWK management met with representatives of Party E to review the current status of SWK’s Finance Receivables portfolio and relevant valuation metrics.
77
Table of Contents
On October 2, 2025, Mr. Staggs and RWAY’s Chief Investment Officer, Greg Greifeld, met to discuss the status of the potential transaction between RWAY and SWK. At the meeting, Mr. Greifeld notified Mr. Staggs that all open due diligence issues had been favorably resolved and the RWAY Board was prepared to move forward with signing the Merger Agreement. Later that day, Mr. Staggs and Mr. Carlson met to discuss the status of recent discussions with Party E and with RWAY.
On October 3, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. The SWK Board discussed the recent decline in RWAY’s stock price and the overall market outlook for BDCs and the private credit market generally, as well as the status of Party E’s efforts to provide a refreshed proposal for a transaction involving SWK. Following discussion, the SWK Board determined that it would be in the best interest of SWK stockholders to refrain from entering into the Merger Agreement with RWAY until Party E was able to make a revised proposal.
Later that day, at the direction of the SWK Board, Mr. Staggs notified representatives of RWAY that SWK had decided to explore a potential alternative proposal given the lapse in exclusivity with RWAY and that the SWK Board saw the need for meaningful financial improvements to RWAY’s proposal given current market conditions and the passage of time since entering into exclusivity with RWAY. Mr. Staggs also held discussions with representatives of Party E senior management during which the Party E representatives provided a verbal overview of the expected terms of Party E’s refreshed proposal, which the Party E representatives committed to providing in writing within the next 48 hours.
On October 5, 2025, Party E submitted a written proposal to acquire substantially all of SWK’s Finance Receivables portfolio for an aggregate cash purchase price based on core asset valuations ranging between 23.5% of GAAP asset value for non-performing loans included within the portfolio to 97.1% of GAAP asset value for performing loans included within the portfolio (the “Party E October 5 Proposal”). The Party E October 5 Proposal was subject to Party E’s final internal approval process, which was expected to be received by October 10, 2025, and noted that Party E expected to be in a position to sign a definitive agreement with SWK within 30 days. The Party E October 5 Proposal was estimated by SWK senior management to represent approximately $17.40 per share of SWK Common Stock ($21.40 per share as adjusted for the $4.00 cash dividend declared in respect of shares of SWK Common Stock), based on the proposed adjustments to NAV implied by the terms of Party E’s offer as well as management’s assumptions regarding necessary cash reserves for post-closing liquidation and wind-down activities. At this time, Party E also requested that SWK enter into exclusivity with Party E and delivered a draft exclusivity agreement for SWK’s review.
Also on October 5, 2025, members of the SWK Board met with Mr. Carlson to discuss the Party E October 5 Proposal relative to the terms of the proposed Merger Agreement with RWAY. Members of the SWK Board and Mr. Carlson discussed the fact that Party E’s all-cash bid may be more favorable than the RWAY proposal under current market conditions.
Later that day, at the direction of the SWK Board, Mr. Staggs notified representatives of RWAY that SWK would evaluate “best and final” proposals by October 10, 2025. Mr. Staggs also notified members of Party E senior management that SWK was expecting a revised proposal from an alternative bidder on October 10, 2025 and that any subsequent offer made by Party E should be Party E’s “best and final” proposal. The representative of Party E notified Mr. Staggs at this time that the Party E October 5 Proposal likely represented the best offer reasonably available from Party E.
On October 7, 2025, RWAY delivered a written proposal to SWK agreeing to increase the terms of its offer by an additional $6 million in the aggregate in the form of a guaranteed cash payment from the Adviser (the “RWAY October 7 Proposal”). Based on estimates by SWK senior management, the RWAY October 7 Proposal represented a transaction value equivalent to $18.23 per share ($22.23 per share as adjusted for the $4.00 cash dividend declared in respect of shares of SWK Common Stock) and a 75% cash / 25% stock mix.
On the morning of October 8, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. The SWK Board discussed the terms of the RWAY October 7 Proposal relative to the Party E October 5 Proposal, including in light of the RWAY July 17 Proposal Considerations (as adjusted for the revised financial terms of the RWAY October 7 Proposal), the Party E July 23 Proposal Considerations (as adjusted for the revised financial terms of the Party E October 5 Proposal) and the Other Considerations. The SWK Board discussed that the revised terms of the RWAY October 7 Proposal represented meaningful incremental value to SWK stockholders but would require additional improvement for the SWK Board to move forward with a transaction with RWAY. Following discussion, the SWK Board directed SWK senior management to solicit feedback from Mr. Carlson concerning the Party E October 5 Proposal and the RWAY October 7 Proposal.
Later that day, members of SWK senior management met with Mr. Carlson to discuss the Party E October 5 Proposal and the RWAY October 7 Proposal, during which Mr. Carlson indicated that he supported the SWK Board’s proposal to seek additional improvement to the RWAY proposal.
78
Table of Contents
In the early evening of October 8, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. At the meeting, the SWK Board continued to discuss the considerations discussed earlier in the day and feedback from Mr. Carlson was reviewed. The SWK Board then directed SWK senior management to notify representatives of RWAY that SWK would be prepared to move towards a signing of the definitive Merger Agreement within the next 24 hours if RWAY and the Adviser agreed to increase the Adviser’s guaranteed cash payment by an additional $3 million in the aggregate.
Immediately following the SWK Board meeting, Mr. Staggs met with a representative of RWAY senior management to signal the SWK Board’s willingness to move forward on the basis of the terms discussed at the SWK Board meeting that evening.
Later that evening, RWAY delivered a written proposal agreeing to increase the terms of its RWAY October 7 Proposal by an additional $3 million in the aggregate, which represented a total guaranteed cash payment from the Adviser of $9 million (the “RWAY October 8 Proposal”). Based on management estimates, the RWAY October 8 Proposal represented aggregate transaction consideration equivalent to $18.45 per SWK share ($22.45 per share as adjusted for the $4.00 cash dividend declared in respect of shares of SWK Common Stock), with a 75% cash / 25% stock mix, assuming that all SWK stockholders entitled to the consideration elect the cash consideration (and the applicable pro rata adjustment mechanism would apply).
Also, in the evening of October 8, 2025, Mr. Staggs met with Mr. Carlson to review the RWAY October 8 Proposal and ascertain Mr. Carlson’s willingness to move forward with a potential transaction on the basis of the RWAY October 8 Proposal. At the meeting, Mr. Carlson conveyed to Mr. Staggs that the Carlson Funds would support the SWK Board’s recommendation as it relates to the RWAY October 8 Proposal.
Late in the evening of October 8, 2025, representatives of Goodwin sent representatives of STB a revised draft of the Merger Agreement, reflecting, among other things, (1) the addition of the $9 million guaranteed cash payment from BCP, (2) a reduction in the Lower Collar amount from $7 million to $5 million and (3) a requirement that the NAV Deductions exclude any severance expense.
On the morning of October 9, 2025, the SWK Board held a meeting at which members of SWK senior management and representatives of Goodwin and KBW were present by invitation. Representatives of Goodwin provided a status update regarding negotiations with RWAY. Representatives of Goodwin also reviewed the disclosures provided by KBW regarding KBW’s investment banking and financial advisory services to RWAY during the preceding two-year period. Following review of this information, the SWK Board concluded that the disclosed information did not cause the SWK Board to believe that KBW’s ability to continue to act effectively as financial advisor to SWK was affected. KBW then reviewed the financial aspects of the proposed transaction, which review included financial analyses performed by KBW, and rendered an opinion to the SWK Board to the effect that, as of such date and subject to the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by KBW as set forth in such opinion, the aggregate consideration (defined in KBW’s opinion as the aggregate stock consideration assumed to be approximately 5.5 million shares of RWAY common stock, the aggregate cash consideration assumed to be approximately $159.1 million and the guaranteed cash payment of $9,000,000 by the Adviser, taken together) in the First Merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of SWK Common Stock, collectively as a group. One of the financial analyses performed by KBW utilized long-range projections prepared by SWK’s management covering six fiscal years (or portions thereof) assuming SWK pursues a long-term wind-down and liquidation scenario of its portfolio assets, as further described in the section entitled “The Mergers—Certain Prospective Financial Information” (the “Wind-Down Projections”). Representatives of Goodwin then discussed with the SWK Board the material terms of the Merger Agreement. Following additional discussion and consideration of the Merger Agreement, the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (including the factors described in the section entitled “The Mergers—Board Recommendation; Reasons for the Merger”), the SWK Board unanimously (i) approved and adopted the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, (ii) determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of SWK and its stockholders, (iii) directed that the adoption of the Merger Agreement be submitted to a vote of the SWK stockholders and (iv) resolved to recommend that SWK stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement and direct that such matter be submitted for consideration of SWK stockholders at a special meeting of the stockholders.
Immediately following the closing of trading of the U.S. stock markets on October 9, 2025, the parties executed the Merger Agreement and related agreements (including the Key Stockholder Agreement with the Carlson Funds) and SWK and RWAY issued a joint press release announcing the execution of the Merger Agreement.
For more information concerning the terms and provisions of the Merger Agreement as negotiated by the parties, see the section entitled “Description of the Merger Agreement” of this proxy statement/prospectus.
79
Table of Contents
Board Recommendation; Reasons for the Mergers
RWAY Reasons for the Mergers
At various telephonic RWAY Board meetings, the RWAY Board considered the approval of the Mergers and the Merger Agreement. In connection with its consideration, the RWAY Board requested that RWAY management provided information regarding the proposed Mergers, SWK, and the anticipated effects of the Mergers on RWAY and RWAY Stockholders, both immediately after the Mergers and over the longer-term assuming that some or all of the anticipated benefits of the Mergers are realized. Over the course of its review of the materials and information provided and its consideration of the Mergers, the RWAY Board consulted with their legal adviser, STB, as well as RWAY’s management. The RWAY Board considered the nature and adequacy of the information provided, including the terms of the Merger Agreement and their duties under state and federal law in approving the Mergers and the conflicts of interest presented by the transactions provided for in the Merger Agreement. The RWAY Board considered numerous factors, including the ones described below, in connection with their consideration and approval of the Mergers. On October 9, 2025, the RWAY Board unanimously determined that the Mergers are in the best interests of RWAY and in the best interests of RWAY Stockholders.
In considering the Mergers, the RWAY Board reviewed comparative information about RWAY and SWK including, among other items: (1) their investment objectives, strategies, policies and restrictions; (2) their individual holdings and the quality of such holdings, including, in particular, the holdings of SWK that were not currently held by RWAY; (3) their existing leverage facilities and permissible asset coverage ratios under the 1940 Act; (4) their short-term and long-term investment performance history and financial results; and (5) the amount of past dividends, distributions and expenses and the anticipated effect of the Mergers on future NII. In addition, the RWAY Board reviewed comprehensive information regarding the anticipated immediate benefits and possible risks to RWAY as a result of the Mergers, and the anticipated investment, market and financial synergies to be experienced by the Combined Company over the shorter and longer-term.
The RWAY Board weighed various benefits and risks in considering the Mergers, both with respect to the immediate effects of the Mergers on RWAY and RWAY Stockholders and with respect to the potential benefits that could be experienced by the Combined Company after the Mergers. Some of the material factors considered by the RWAY Board that assisted them in concluding that the Mergers are in the best interests of RWAY and RWAY Stockholders included, among others:
Increased Scale and Diversification
The RWAY Board considered the significant increase in scale expected as a result of the proposed Mergers and that there are various possible advantages to the larger size of the Combined Company. RWAY net assets on a pro forma basis are expected to increase to approximately $67.0 million, and a pro forma increase in total assets to approximately $276.1 million, based on balance sheet data of each company as of September 30, 2025, assuming leverage remains constant on pro forma basis and excluding any estimated transaction costs or potential special dividend payments. This increase in size could potentially allow for greater participation in investments and scale. The proposed Mergers would also increase RWAY’s total investments by $263.5 million (based on September 30, 2025 data), meaningfully increasing the Combined Company’s scale.
The RWAY Board considered that a combined portfolio would result in more diversification based on number of portfolio companies and position size, and that diversification is key to risk mitigation for a BDC. Diversification reduces the reliance on the success of one singular investment, and the proposed Mergers strengthen that effort.
Acquisition of a Known, High-Quality Portfolio of Assets
The RWAY Board considered that RWAY and SWK employ a similar investment strategy, and are subject to substantially similar risks, and that each of RWAY and SWK focus on investments in middle market companies. The RWAY Board concluded that the combination of two known, diversified portfolios of investments, constructed and managed by affiliated investment advisers, will facilitate portfolio consolidation and meaningfully mitigate potential integration risk.
Strong Combined Portfolio Company Metrics
The RWAY Board considered that a combined portfolio would result in approximately $1.2 million of investments on a pro forma basis based on balances as of September 30, 2025. The asset mix of the Combined Company would be comprised of approximately 91.5% of first lien debt, 1.8% of second lien debt, 1.1% in a joint venture, 3.4% in equity positions, 1.8% in warrants, and 0.4% in royalties based on data as of September 30, 2025.
80
Table of Contents
Greater Access to Debt Markets and Financing Cost Savings
The RWAY Board discussed how the Combined Company may create potential for more diverse funding sources and create financing cost savings over time. The RWAY Board noted the potential advantages of increased scale when issuing debt.
Accretive to RWAY NII
The RWAY Board considered the earnings profile of RWAY and the potential earnings profile of the Combined Company while evaluating the Mergers and determined that the Mergers would be accretive to RWAY’s NII. The RWAY Board considered the lower expense profile the Combined Company could have, through optimizing its financing structure, lowering financing costs from scale over time, and eliminating redundant professional services and corporate expenses which would outweigh any increased expenses in the short-term. Additionally, the RWAY Board determined that RWAY’s NII could benefit further from incremental portfolio-level yield from the asset mix of the Combined Company. The RWAY Board concluded that a combined company would have an advantageous NII return profile compared to RWAY alone as a result.
Investment Strategies and Risks of Both Companies
The RWAY Board also evaluated the effect of the proposed Mergers on RWAY’s investment objectives. The RWAY Board reviewed both RWAY’s and SWK’s investment program and acknowledged that they have similar investment objectives and substantially similar strategies and risks pertaining to the healthcare and life sciences sectors.
In the course of their deliberations, the RWAY Board also considered a variety of risks and certain potentially negative factors that could cause the Mergers not to close or the anticipated benefits of the Mergers not to be realized, including the following (which are not in any relative order of importance):
The above discussion of the information and factors that the RWAY Board considered in making their decisions is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material benefits, risks and other factors considered by the RWAY Board. Because of the wide variety of factors considered in connection with the evaluation of the Mergers and Merger Agreement and the complexity of those matters, the RWAY Board did not find it useful to, and did not attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to these factors. In addition, the individual members of the RWAY Board may have given different weights to different factors.
81
Table of Contents
SWK Board Recommendation
The SWK Board has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger), determined the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) advisable and directed that such matters be submitted to SWK Stockholders for approval. After careful consideration the SWK Board unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) determined the Merger Agreement and the other transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) are advisable and unanimously recommends that SWK Stockholders vote "FOR" each of the Proposals. The SWK Board did not make a determination as to the advisability of the Second Merger or the Third Merger as such transactions would not have an effect on the Total Per Share Consideration to be received by SWK Stockholders or otherwise affect the rights and entitlements of SWK Stockholders in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
SWK Reasons for the Mergers
The SWK Board carefully considered the approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) over the course of various telephonic and video conference meetings. To facilitate the SWK Board’s consideration, SWK’s management provided the SWK Board with various materials and information regarding SWK and RWAY as more fully discussed in the section entitled “The Mergers – Certain Prospective Financial Information”.
Throughout the process of reviewing the materials and information provided and considering the Mergers, the SWK Board conferred with management of SWK as well as SWK’s outside legal and financial advisors. The SWK Board considered the terms of the Merger Agreement, their duties under state and federal law in considering and ultimately approving the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger). The SWK Board considered numerous factors, including the ones described below, in connection with its consideration and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger). On October 9, 2025, the SWK Board unanimously determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of SWK and SWK Stockholders.
The SWK Board weighed various potential benefits and risks in considering the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger), both with respect to the immediate effects of the Mergers on SWK and SWK Stockholders and with respect to the potential benefits and risks that could be experienced by the Combined Company after the Mergers. Some of the factors (which are not in any relative order of importance) considered by the SWK Board that assisted it in concluding that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) are in the best interests of SWK and SWK Stockholders included, among others:
Most Attractive Strategic Alternative
The view of the SWK Board that the proposed transaction with RWAY was the most attractive strategic alternative available to SWK and SWK Stockholders, including in comparison to the alternative of winding down SWK’s business and operations. In this regard, the SWK Board considered:
82
Table of Contents
Strategic Considerations and Synergies
The SWK Board considered the synergies and other benefits expected from the Mergers such as:
83
Table of Contents
Favorable Terms of the Merger Agreement
As more fully described in the section entitled “Description of the Merger Agreement,” the SWK Board carefully reviewed the structure of the proposed Mergers and the other terms of the Merger Agreement, including but not limited to:
Opinion of Financial Advisor to SWK
The SWK Board considered the financial presentation, dated October 9, 2025, of KBW provided to and reviewed with the SWK Board and the opinion of KBW rendered to the SWK Board on October 9, 2025 as to, as of the date of the opinion, the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of SWK Common Stock of the aggregate consideration (defined in KBW’s opinion as the aggregate stock consideration assumed to be approximately 5.5 million shares of RWAY common stock, the aggregate cash consideration assumed to be approximately $159.1 million and the Guaranteed Cash Payment of $9,000,000, taken together) in the First Merger, as more fully described below in the section entitled “The Merger — Opinion of Financial Advisor to SWK.” At the request of the SWK Board, KBW attended the special telephonic and video meeting of the SWK Board to provide the SWK Board with the opportunity to discuss KBW’s opinion.
84
Table of Contents
Improved Access to Capital
The SWK Board considered how the Combined Company’s scale would be expected to improve access to more diverse, lower cost sources of capital compared to what SWK would be expected to obtain without the scale provided by the Mergers. For example, the larger scale of the Combined Company may allow the Combined Company to more efficiently manage credit facilities and reduce liability costs over time through increased scale. The SWK Board considered that a larger market capitalization for the Combined Company relative to SWK could reduce the pricing of future debt offerings than what may be negotiated by RWAY on a standalone basis.
Increased Scale and Potential for Improved Secondary Market Liquidity
The SWK Board considered that scale and liquidity advantages are expected to accrue to the Combined Company as a result of its larger size. The SWK Board also considered that shares of larger BDCs, like the Combined Company, tend to have higher average daily trading volumes, which would give existing SWK Stockholders more flexibility to manage their investments and would be expected to attract new investors, including institutional investors, seeking a more liquid stock than SWK provides on a standalone basis or would provide in a wind down scenario.
In the course of their deliberations, the SWK Board also considered a variety of risks and certain potentially negative factors that could cause the Mergers not to close or the anticipated benefits of the Mergers not to be realized, including the following (which are not in any relative order of importance):
85
Table of Contents
Other Risks. There are various other risks associated with the Mergers and the business of SWK and the Combined Company described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in SWK’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and in SWK’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2025, June 30, 2025 and September 30, 2025, which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus and in the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
This discussion of the information and factors that the SWK Board considered in making their decisions is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material benefits, risks and other factors considered by the SWK Board. Because of the wide variety of factors considered in connection with the evaluation of the Mergers and Merger Agreement and the complexity of those matters, the SWK Board did not find it useful to, and did not attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to these factors. In addition, the individual members of the SWK the SWK Board may have given different weights to different factors.
The SWK Board consulted with KBW, acting as SWK’s financial advisor, regarding financial matters in connection with its evaluation of the financial terms of the Mergers. In addition, the SWK Board relied on their legal advisors for legal analysis in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
The SWK Board considered all of these factors and others as a whole and, on balance, determined the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of SWK and SWK Stockholders and unanimously approved and adopted the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger).
Interests of the Directors and Executive Officers of SWK in the Mergers
Certain of SWK’s directors and executive officers may have financial interests in the Mergers that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of SWK Stockholders generally. The SWK Board was aware of these potential interests and considered them, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the Merger Agreement and in reaching its decision to approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger), and to recommend that the SWK Stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the First Merger as more fully discussed in “The Mergers — Reasons for the Mergers – SWK Reasons for the Mergers.”
SWK’s current executive officers and their respective positions are as follows:
SWK’s current directors (none of whom are an employee of SWK) are as follows:
Certain other individuals who served since the beginning of SWK’s last fiscal year would be considered executive officers or non-employee directors for purposes of this disclosure, but as former employees or directors of SWK, they are not entitled to the payments and benefits described below for the executive officers and non-employee directors in connection with the Mergers. None of the former
86
Table of Contents
executive officers or directors are receiving any compensation in connection with the Mergers. Accordingly, such former executive officers and non-employee directors are not included in this disclosure.
Treatment of Equity and Equity-Based Awards
SWK Restricted Stock Awards
Each SWK Restricted Stock Award that is outstanding and unvested as of the Effective Time, including those held by SWK’s directors and executive officers, will vest in full immediately prior to the Effective Time and each share of SWK Common Stock subject to an outstanding SWK Restricted Stock Award will be accelerated and cancelled in exchange for the right to receive the Total Per Share Consideration, subject to applicable withholding.
The following table sets forth, for each of SWK’s directors and executive officers, (1) the aggregate number of shares of SWK Common Stock subject to an outstanding SWK Restricted Stock Award held as of February 27, 2026 and (2) the estimated value that the directors and executive officers will receive in respect of such SWK Restricted Stock Awards in connection with the First Merger, calculated based on a per share price of SWK Common Stock of $18.45, which represents an estimate of the Total Per Share Consideration, based on the assumptions outlined in the section entitled “Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to SWK’s Named Executive Officers in Connection with the Mergers” below.
Name |
|
Shares Subject to SWK Restricted Stock Awards |
|
Value of SWK Restricted Stock Awards |
|
Joe D. Staggs |
|
42,340 |
|
$ |
781,191 |
Adam Rice |
|
10,671 |
|
$ |
196,880 |
Non-Employee Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
Laurie Dotter |
|
3,858 |
|
$ |
71,180 |
Jerry Albright |
|
3,858 |
|
$ |
71,180 |
Robert K. Hatcher |
|
3,858 |
|
$ |
71,180 |
Severance Entitlements
Each of SWK’s executive officers has entered into an employment agreement with SWK (each, an “Employment Agreement”). Each of the Employment Agreements provides for certain payments and benefits in connection with a “Change in Control” (as defined in the applicable Employment Agreement). The Mergers will qualify as a “Change in Control” under the Employment Agreements.
Joe D. Staggs
Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Staggs’s Employment Agreement, if his employment with SWK ceases due to a termination by SWK without Cause or resignation by him with Good Reason within one year following a Change in Control (as such terms are defined in his Employment Agreement), then Mr. Staggs will receive: (i) continued payment of his base salary for a period of 18 months following the date of his termination of employment, (ii) to the extent an annual bonus has been earned but not paid with respect to the fiscal year ended immediately prior to the cessation of Mr. Staggs’ employment, payment of such annual bonus; (iii) waiver or reimbursement of the cost of COBRA group health plan coverage for Mr. Staggs and his covered family members for 18 months following such termination of employment, and (iv) a pro rata annual bonus for the fiscal year in which Mr. Staggs’ termination of employment occurs based on actual results for such year.
Adam Rice
Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Rice’s Employment Agreement, if his employment with SWK is terminated by SWK within one year following a Change in Control (as defined in his Employment Agreement), then Mr. Rice will receive: (i) continued payment of his base salary for a period of 6 months following the date of his termination of employment, (ii) to the extent his annual bonus has been earned but not paid with respect to the fiscal year ended immediately prior to the cessation of his employment, payment of such annual bonus; (iii) waiver or reimbursement of the cost of COBRA group health plan coverage for Mr. Rice and his covered family members for up to 6 months following such termination of employment, and (iv) an amount equal to 50% of his annualized prior year bonus payment.
The severance benefits under the Employment Agreements are contingent upon the executive officer executing and not revoking a general release of claims in favor of SWK. The Employment Agreements also provide that payments and benefits payable to each executive officer will be reduced so that no portion of such payments and benefits are subject to the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, unless the executive officer would be better off on an after-tax basis receiving all such payments and benefits.
87
Table of Contents
In lieu of additional equity awards, the names executive officers’ 2026 annual equity awards were paid in cash as part of the named executive officers’ 2025 annual bonuses.
The estimated value of the severance payments and benefits for each of SWK’s executive officers is set forth below in the table entitled “— Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to SWK’s Named Executive Officers in Connection with the Mergers.”
New RWAY Arrangements
Certain of SWK’s executive officers may continue to provide services to RWAY or an affiliate thereof after the Effective Time and may enter into new agreements, arrangements or understandings with RWAY to set forth the terms and compensation of such service. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, no such agreements, arrangements or understandings with RWAY exist.
Indemnification
Each of SWK’s executive officers and directors is entitled to the indemnification and insurance benefits in favor of SWK’s directors and executive officers, as described in more detail in “Description of the Merger Agreement — Indemnification.”
Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to SWK’s Named Executive Officers in Connection with the Mergers
This section sets forth the information required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K regarding the compensation that is based on or otherwise related to the Mergers for each of SWK’s named executive officers. Although Yvette Heinrichson, SWK’s former Chief Financial Officer, is a named executive officer for purposes of this disclosure, Ms. Heinrichson’s service relationship with SWK ended on February 13, 2024 and she does not hold any unvested SWK equity awards and does not have any interests in the Mergers except insofar as she may hold shares of SWK Common Stock. Accordingly, Ms. Heinrichson has been omitted from the table below.
The amounts shown in the table below are estimates based on multiple assumptions that may or may not actually occur or be accurate on the relevant date, including the assumptions described below and in the footnotes to the table. For purposes of calculating such amounts, the following assumptions were used:
Name |
|
Cash(1) |
|
Equity(2) |
|
Perquisites/ Benefits(3) |
|
Total |
||||
Joe D. Staggs |
|
$ |
982,192 |
|
$ |
781,191 |
|
$ |
27,000 |
|
$ |
1,790,383 |
Adam Rice |
|
$ |
400,670 |
|
$ |
196,880 |
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
$ |
606,550 |
88
Table of Contents
Employee Matters
The Merger Agreement provides that SWK will terminate the employment or service of each officer, director, employee or individual independent contractor or consultant of SWK (each, a “Service Provider”), including SWK’s executive officers, no later than immediately prior to the Effective Time, contingent upon the closing of the Mergers, and that SWK will deliver to each such Service Provider a release of claims in favor of SWK, RWAY, and their affiliates prior to the Effective Time, requiring signature no earlier than the date of Closing.
The Merger Agreement further provides that for the period commencing at the Effective Time and ending 12 months after the Effective Time, RWAY will provide to the employees of SWK who remain employed after the Effective Time with: (i) an annual base salary or wage rate and an annual target bonus opportunity (excluding equity-based compensation), if any, which are no less in the aggregate than the annual base salary or wage rate and annual target bonus opportunity (excluding equity-based compensation) provided by SWK immediately prior to the date of Closing; (ii) retirement, health and welfare benefits that are substantially similar in the aggregate to those provided by the Adviser to similarly situated employees of the Adviser; and (iii) severance benefits that are substantially similar to those provided by the Adviser to similarly situated employees of the Adviser.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, SWK will terminate any plan sponsored or maintained by SWK or any of its subsidiaries that is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) and Section 401(k) of the Code, effective no later than the day immediately before the Closing.
Opinion of Financial Advisor to SWK
SWK engaged KBW to render financial advisory and investment banking services to SWK, including an opinion to the SWK Board as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of SWK Common Stock, collectively as a group, of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger. SWK selected KBW because KBW is a nationally recognized investment banking firm with substantial experience in transactions similar to the proposed transaction.
As part of its engagement, representatives of KBW attended the meeting of SWK Board held on October 9, 2025 at which the SWK Board evaluated the proposed transaction. At this meeting, KBW reviewed the financial aspects of the proposed transaction and rendered an opinion to the SWK Board to the effect that, as of such date and subject to the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by KBW as set forth in such opinion, the aggregate consideration (defined in KBW’s opinion as the aggregate stock consideration assumed to be approximately 5.5 million shares of RWAY Common Stock, the aggregate cash consideration assumed to be approximately $159.1 million and the Guaranteed Cash Payment of $9.0 million, taken together) in the First Merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of SWK Common Stock, collectively as a group. The SWK Board approved the Merger Agreement at this meeting.
The description of the opinion set forth herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion, which is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference, and describes the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by KBW in preparing the opinion.
KBW’s opinion speaks only as of the date of the opinion. The opinion was for the information of, and was directed to, the SWK Board (in its capacity as such) in connection with its consideration of the financial terms of the transaction. The opinion addressed only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger to the holders of SWK Common Stock, collectively as a group. It did not address the underlying business decision of SWK to engage in the transaction or enter into the Merger Agreement or constitute a recommendation to the SWK Board in connection with the transaction, and it does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of SWK Common Stock or any stockholder of any other entity as to how to vote or act in connection with the transaction or any other matter (including, with respect to holders of SWK Common Stock, what election any such stockholder should make with respect to receiving the Per Share Cash Consideration in lieu of the Per Share Stock Consideration), nor does it constitute a recommendation regarding whether or not any such stockholder should enter into a voting, stockholders’, or affiliates’ agreement with respect to the transaction or exercise any dissenters’ or appraisal rights that may be available to such stockholder.
89
Table of Contents
KBW’s opinion was reviewed and approved by KBW’s Fairness Opinion Committee in conformity with its policies and procedures established under the requirements of Rule 5150 of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
At the direction of SWK, with the consent of the SWK Board and without independent verification, KBW relied upon and assumed for purposes of its analyses and opinion, that the RWAY Per Share NAV would be $13.66 (as if the RWAY Per Share NAV were equal to the publicly reported June 30, 2025 net asset value per share of RWAY Common Stock) and the Closing SWK Net Asset Value would be approximately $234.6 million and that, as a result thereof, the aggregate stock consideration would be approximately 5.5 million shares of RWAY Common Stock and the aggregate cash consideration would be approximately $159.1 million.
In connection with the opinion, KBW reviewed, analyzed and relied upon material bearing upon the financial and operating condition of SWK and RWAY and bearing upon the transaction, including, among other things:
KBW’s consideration of financial information and other factors that it deemed appropriate under the circumstances or relevant to its analyses included, among others, the following:
KBW also performed such other studies and analyses as it considered appropriate and took into account its assessment of general economic, market and financial conditions and its experience in other transactions, as well as its experience in securities valuation and knowledge of the business development company industry generally. KBW also participated in discussions that were held with the management of SWK and the management of RWAY and Adviser regarding the respective past and current business operations, regulatory relations, financial condition and future prospects of SWK and RWAY and such other matters as KBW deemed relevant to its inquiry. In addition, KBW considered the results of the efforts undertaken by SWK, with KBW’s assistance, to solicit indications of interest from third parties regarding a potential transaction with SWK.
In conducting its review and arriving at its opinion, KBW relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information that was provided to or discussed with KBW or that was publicly available and did not independently verify the accuracy or completeness of any such information or assume any responsibility or liability for such verification, accuracy or completeness. KBW relied upon the management of SWK as to the reasonableness and achievability of the financial and operating
90
Table of Contents
forecasts and projections of SWK referred to above (and the assumptions and bases therefor), and KBW assumed that such forecasts and projections were reasonably prepared and represented the best currently available estimates and judgments of such management. KBW further relied, with the consent of SWK management, upon RWAY and Adviser management as to the reasonableness and achievability of the publicly available consensus “street estimates” of RWAY referred to above (and the assumptions and bases therefor), and KBW assumed that such estimates were consistent with the best currently available estimates and judgments of RWAY and Adviser management.
It is understood that the foregoing financial information of SWK that was provided to KBW was not prepared with the expectation of public disclosure and that all of the foregoing financial information of SWK and RWAY, including the publicly available consensus “street estimates” of RWAY referred to above, were based on numerous variables and assumptions that were inherently uncertain and, accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from those set forth in such information. KBW relied on all such information without independent verification or analysis and did not in any respect assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness thereof. KBW assumed, based on discussions with the management of SWK and the management of RWAY and Adviser, and with the consent of the SWK Board, that all such information provided a reasonable basis upon which KBW could form its opinion and KBW expressed no view as to any such information or the assumptions or bases therefor. Among other things, the financial and operating forecasts and projections of SWK referred to above assumed an orderly wind down scenario ending in 2030 and reflected assumptions regarding limitations on SWK’s ability to utilize deferred tax assets.
KBW also assumed that there were no material changes in the assets, liabilities, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects of either SWK or RWAY since the date of the last financial statements of each such entity that were made available to KBW. In rendering its opinion, KBW did not make or obtain any evaluations or appraisals or physical inspection of the property, assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of SWK or RWAY, the collateral securing any of such assets or liabilities, or the collectability of any such assets, nor did KBW examine any individual loan or credit files, nor did it evaluate the solvency, financial capability or fair value of SWK or RWAY under any state or federal laws, including those relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or other matters. KBW expressed no view as to the value of any investment asset owned by SWK or RWAY that was used in connection with the net asset value computations made by SWK or RWAY or the valuation policies and procedures of SWK or RWAY in connection therewith. Estimates of values of companies and assets do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which companies or assets may actually be sold. Such estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty and should not be taken as KBW’s view of the actual value of any companies or assets.
KBW assumed, in all respects material to its analyses, the following:
KBW assumed that the transaction would be consummated in a manner that complies with the applicable provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all other applicable federal and state statutes, rules and regulations. KBW was further advised by representatives of SWK that SWK relied upon advice from its advisors (other than KBW) or other appropriate sources as to all legal, financial reporting, tax, accounting and regulatory matters with respect to SWK, RWAY, Acquisition Sub, Intermediary Sub, the Mergers and any related transaction, and the Merger Agreement. KBW did not provide advice with respect to any such matters.
91
Table of Contents
KBW’s opinion addressed only the fairness, from a financial point of view, as of the date of such opinion, of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger to the holders of SWK Common Stock, collectively as a group, without regard to the individual circumstances of the Key Stockholder or any other specific holders of SWK Common Stock with respect to control, voting or other rights or aspects which may distinguish such holders. KBW expressed no view or opinion as to any other terms or aspects of the Mergers or any term or aspect of any related transaction, including without limitation, the form or structure of the transaction (including the form and structure of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger or the allocation thereof between cash and stock) or any such related transaction, the treatment of existing loan and bond indebtedness of SWK, any consequences of the transaction or any such related transaction to SWK, its stockholders, creditors or otherwise, or any terms, aspects, merits or implications of any representations and warranties insurance policy, employment, consulting, voting, support, stockholder or other agreements, arrangements or understandings contemplated or entered into in connection with the Mergers, any such related transaction or otherwise. KBW’s opinion was necessarily based upon conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on the date of the opinion and the information made available to KBW through the date of the opinion. There has been significant volatility in the stock and other financial markets arising from global tensions and political division, economic uncertainty, recently announced actual or threatened imposition of tariff increases, inflation, and prolonged higher interest rates. Developments subsequent to the date of KBW’s opinion may have affected and may affect the conclusion reached in KBW’s opinion and KBW did not and does not have an obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion. KBW expressed no view or opinion as to any changes after the date of its opinion to the RWAY Per Share NAV or the Closing SWK Net Asset Value (and the resulting aggregate stock consideration and the resulting aggregate cash consideration) from the amounts thereof that KBW was directed to assume for purposes of its analyses and this opinion. KBW’s opinion did not address, and KBW expressed no view or opinion with respect to:
92
Table of Contents
In performing its analyses, KBW made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, which are beyond the control of KBW, SWK, RWAY and Adviser. Any estimates contained in the analyses performed by KBW are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by these analyses. Additionally, estimates of the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which such businesses or securities might actually be sold. Accordingly, these analyses and estimates are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty. In addition, the KBW opinion was among several factors taken into consideration by the SWK Board in making its determination to approve the Merger Agreement and the First Merger. Consequently, the analyses described below should not be viewed as determinative of the decision of the SWK Board with respect to the fairness of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger. The type and amount of consideration payable in the First Merger were determined through negotiation between SWK, on the one hand, and RWAY and Adviser, on the other hand, and the decision of SWK to enter into the Merger Agreement was solely that of the SWK Board.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses presented by KBW to the SWK Board in connection with its opinion. The summary is not a complete description of the financial analyses underlying the opinion or the presentation made by KBW to the SWK Board, but summarizes the material analyses performed and presented in connection with such opinion. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex analytic process involving various determinations as to appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, KBW did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor that it considered, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. Accordingly, KBW believes that its analyses and the summary of its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on the information presented below in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying its analyses and opinion.
Implied Value of the Aggregate Merger Consideration. KBW calculated an implied value of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger of approximately $223.1 million equal to the sum of the implied value of the aggregate stock consideration assumed to be approximately 5.5 million shares of RWAY Common Stock based on the closing price of RWAY Common Stock on October 8, 2025, the aggregate cash consideration assumed to be approximately $159.1 million and the Guaranteed Cash Payment of $9.0 million. This implied value of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger was used to calculate implied transaction multiples and those multiples were compared to the low, 25th percentile, median, average, 75th percentile and high multiples shown in the financial analyses of SWK described below. This implied transaction value for the proposed transaction was also compared to the ranges of implied equity value of SWK in the financial analyses of SWK described below.
93
Table of Contents
Selected Companies Analysis of SWK #1. Using publicly available information, KBW reviewed, among other things, the market performance of 32 selected publicly traded, internally and externally managed business development companies (“BDCs”) with market capitalizations under $1.0 billion, which selected companies included RWAY.
The selected companies were as follows (shown by column in descending order of market capitalization):
To perform this analysis, KBW used market price information as of October 8, 2025, tangible book value (“TBV”) per share data as of the end of the most recent completed quarterly period available, latest 12 months (“LTM”) reported NII per share and LTM NII per share before base management fees or incentive fees (“Pre-Mgmt. Fee NII”) of the selected companies. KBW also used calendar years 2025 and 2026 NII per share estimates taken from consensus “street estimates” of the selected companies to the extent publicly available (2025 consensus “street estimates” were not publicly available for two of the selected companies and 2026 consensus “street estimates” were not publicly available for four of the selected companies).
KBW’s analysis showed the following concerning the market performance of the selected companies to the extent publicly available, as well as corresponding implied multiples for SWK based on the closing price of SWK Common Stock on October 8, 2025 which corresponding implied multiples were calculated using tangible book value (assumed to be June 30, 2025 stockholders’ equity minus deferred tax asset) per share and net income per share data of SWK as of or for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2025 and earnings per share (“EPS”) consensus “street estimates” of SWK for calendar years 2025 and 2026 (with net income as a proxy for NII):
|
|
|
|
Selected Companies |
||||||||||
|
|
SWK |
|
Low |
|
25th Perc. |
|
Median |
|
Average |
|
75th Perc. |
|
High |
Price / TBV per share |
|
0.78x |
|
0.56x |
|
0.68x |
|
0.77x |
|
0.78x |
|
0.85x |
|
1.05x |
Price / LTM NII per share |
|
10.2x |
|
3.8x |
|
6.1x |
|
7.3x |
|
7.9x |
|
8.5x |
|
22.7x |
Price / LTM Pre-Mgmt. Fee NII |
|
10.2x |
|
3.1x |
|
4.2x |
|
5.3x |
|
6.0x |
|
5.7x |
|
22.7x |
Price / CY2025 NII per share |
|
8.4x |
|
4.6x |
|
6.8x |
|
7.6x |
|
8.6x |
|
9.0x |
|
23.3x |
Price / CY2026 NII per share |
|
10.6x |
|
5.7x |
|
6.8x |
|
8.1x |
|
8.4x |
|
9.0x |
|
14.8x |
94
Table of Contents
KBW then applied a range of price-to-TBV per share multiples of 0.68x to 0.85x derived from the 25th percentile and 75th percentile multiples of the selected companies to the estimated Closing SWK Net Asset Value provided by SWK management. KBW also applied a range of price-to-LTM NII per share multiples of 6.09x to 8.48x derived from the 25th percentile and 75th percentile multiples of the selected companies to the annualized net income of SWK (based on fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025). This analysis indicated the following ranges of the implied total equity value of SWK Common Stock, as compared to the implied value of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger of approximately $223.1 million:
|
|
SWK Implied Total Equity Ranges |
Based on estimated Closing SWK Net Asset Value provided by SWK management |
|
$158.8 to $199.0 |
Based on annualized net income of SWK (based on fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025) |
|
$86.1 to $120.0 |
No company used as a comparison in the above selected companies analysis is identical to SWK. Accordingly, an analysis of these results is not mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies involved.
Selected Companies Analysis of SWK #2. Using publicly available information, KBW reviewed, among other things, the market performance of five selected publicly traded venture lending BDCs, which selected companies included RWAY.
The selected companies were as follows (shown in descending order of market capitalization):
To perform this analysis, KBW used market price information as of October 8, 2025, TBV per share data as of the end of the most recent completed quarterly period available, LTM NII per share and LTM Pre-Mgmt. Fee NII of the selected companies. KBW also used calendar years 2025 and 2026 NII per share estimates taken from consensus “street estimates” of the selected companies.
KBW’s analysis showed the following concerning the market performance of the selected companies, as well as corresponding implied multiples for SWK based on the closing price of SWK Common Stock on October 8, 2025 which corresponding implied multiples were calculated using tangible book value (assumed to be June 30, 2025 stockholders’ equity minus deferred tax asset) per share and net income per share data of SWK as of or for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2025 and EPS consensus “street estimates” of SWK for calendar years 2025 and 2026 (with net income as a proxy for NII):
|
|
|
|
Selected Companies |
||||||||||
|
|
SWK |
|
Low |
|
25th Perc. |
|
Median |
|
Average |
|
75th Perc. |
|
High |
Price / TBV per share |
|
0.78x |
|
0.64x |
|
0.73x |
|
0.91x |
|
0.98x |
|
1.12x |
|
1.50x |
Price / LTM NII per share |
|
10.2x |
|
4.6x |
|
5.4x |
|
6.2x |
|
6.5x |
|
7.0x |
|
9.3x |
Price / LTM Pre-Mgmt. Fee NII |
|
10.2x |
|
3.6x |
|
4.2x |
|
4.3x |
|
5.7x |
|
7.0x |
|
9.3x |
Price / CY2025 NII per share |
|
8.4x |
|
5.0x |
|
5.6x |
|
6.4x |
|
6.6x |
|
7.1x |
|
9.2x |
Price / CY2026 NII per share |
|
10.6x |
|
5.8x |
|
5.8x |
|
6.6x |
|
6.8x |
|
7.0x |
|
8.9x |
95
Table of Contents
KBW then applied a range of price-to-TBV per share multiples of 0.73x to 1.12x derived from the 25th percentile and 75th percentile multiples of the selected companies to the estimated Closing SWK Net Asset Value provided by SWK management. KBW also applied a range of price-to-LTM NII per share multiples of 5.42x to 7.03x derived from the 25th percentile and 75th percentile multiples of the selected companies to the annualized net income of SWK (based on fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025). This analysis indicated the following ranges of the implied total equity value of SWK Common Stock, as compared to the implied value of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger of approximately $223.1 million:
|
|
SWK Implied Total Equity Ranges |
Based on estimated Closing SWK Net Asset Value provided by SWK management |
|
$171.0 to $263.8 |
Based on annualized net income of SWK (based on fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025) |
|
$76.7 to $99.5 |
No company used as a comparison in the above selected companies analysis is identical to SWK. Accordingly, an analysis of these results is not mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies involved.
Selected Companies Analysis of RWAY. Using publicly available information, KBW reviewed, among other things, the market performance of 18 selected publicly traded, externally managed BDCs with market capitalizations less than $500 million.
The selected companies were as follows (shown by column in descending order of market capitalization):
To perform this analysis, KBW used market price information as of October 8, 2025, TBV per share data as of the end of the most recent completed quarterly period available, LTM NII per share and LTM Pre-Mgmt. Fee NII of the selected companies. KBW also used calendar years 2025 and 2026 NII per share estimates taken from consensus “street estimates” of the selected companies to the extent publicly available (2025 consensus “street estimates” were not publicly available for one of the selected companies and 2026 consensus “street estimates” were not publicly available for two of the selected companies).
96
Table of Contents
KBW’s analysis showed the following concerning the market performance of the selected companies to the extent publicly available, as well as corresponding implied multiples for RWAY based on the closing price of RWAY Common Stock on October 8, 2025 which corresponding implied multiples were calculated using historical reported financial data of RWAY as of or for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2025 and consensus “street estimates” of RWAY for calendar years 2025 and 2026:
|
|
|
|
Selected Companies |
||||||||||
|
|
RWAY |
|
Low |
|
25th Perc. |
|
Median |
|
Average |
|
75th Perc. |
|
High |
Price / TBV per share |
|
0.73x |
|
0.56x |
|
0.65x |
|
0.77x |
|
0.76x |
|
0.87x |
|
1.00x |
Price / LTM NII per share |
|
6.2x |
|
3.8x |
|
5.2x |
|
6.5x |
|
6.7x |
|
8.2x |
|
10.2x |
Price / LTM Pre-Mgmt. Fee NII |
|
4.2x |
|
3.1x |
|
3.7x |
|
4.5x |
|
4.7x |
|
5.5x |
|
7.4x |
Price / CY2025 NII per share |
|
6.4x |
|
4.6x |
|
5.8x |
|
7.4x |
|
7.8x |
|
9.1x |
|
15.5x |
Price / CY2026 NII per share |
|
6.6x |
|
5.7x |
|
6.0x |
|
7.0x |
|
8.1x |
|
9.8x |
|
14.7x |
No company used as a comparison in the above selected companies analysis is identical to RWAY. Accordingly, an analysis of these results is not mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies involved.
Selected Transactions Analysis. KBW reviewed publicly available information related to 35 selected acquisitions of U.S. business development companies announced since the beginning of 2015. The selected transactions were as follows:
Acquirer |
|
Acquired Company |
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation |
|
Monroe Capital Corporation |
Monroe Capital Income Plus Corporation |
|
Monroe Capital Corporation |
Portman Ridge Finance Corporation |
|
Logan Ridge Finance Corporation |
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. |
|
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. II |
Pantheon Silver Holdings LLC |
|
Goldman Sachs Private Middle Market Credit LLC |
Blue Owl Capital Corporation |
|
Blue Owl Capital Corporation III |
Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. |
|
Carlyle Secured Lending III |
North Haven Private Income Fund LLC |
|
SL Investment Corp. |
Golub Capital BDC, Inc. |
|
Golub Capital BDC 3, Inc. |
Midcap Financial Investment Corporation |
|
Apollo Senior Floating Rate Fund Inc. |
Midcap Financial Investment Corporation |
|
Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc. |
Franklin BSP Capital Corporation |
|
Franklin BSP Lending Corporation |
BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. |
|
BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation |
Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. |
|
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC, Inc. |
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation |
|
Oaktree Strategic Income II, Inc. |
SLR Investment Corp. |
|
SLR Senior Investment Corp. |
Barings BDC Inc. |
|
Sierra Income Corporation |
Portman Ridge Finance Corporation |
|
Harvest Capital Credit Corp. |
FS KKR Capital Corp. |
|
FS KKR Capital Corp. II |
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation |
|
Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation |
Barings BDC, Inc. |
|
MVC Capital, Inc. |
Portman Ridge Finance Corporation |
|
Garrison Capital |
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. |
|
Goldman Sachs Middle Market Lending Corp. |
Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. |
|
Alcentra Capital Corp. |
Portman Ridge Finance Corporation |
|
OHA Investment Corp. |
FS Investment Corporation II |
|
FS Investment Corporation III, FS Investment Corporation IV, Corporate Capital Trust II |
East Asset Management, LLC |
|
Rand Capital Corporation |
Golub Capital BDC, Inc. |
|
Golub Capital Investment Corporation |
FS Investment Corporation |
|
Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. |
Benefit Street Partners LLC; Barings |
|
Triangle Capital Corporation |
TCG BDC, Inc. |
|
NF Investment Corp. |
CĪON Investment Corporation |
|
Credit Suisse Park View BDC, Inc. |
MAST Capital Management LLC; Great Elm Capital Group Inc. |
|
Full Circle Capital Corporation |
Ares Capital Corporation |
|
American Capital, Ltd. |
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. |
|
MCG Capital Corporation |
97
Table of Contents
For each selected transaction, KBW derived the following implied transaction statistics, in each case based on the transaction consideration value paid for the acquired company (including contributions by external managers) and using financial data based on the acquired company’s then latest publicly available financial statements prior to the announcement of the respective transaction (adjusted to reflect announced pre-closing adjustments):
KBW also reviewed the price per common share paid for the acquired company for the 22 selected transactions involving publicly traded acquired companies as a premium/(discount) to the closing price of the acquired company one day and 30 days prior to the announcement of the respective transaction (expressed as percentages and referred to as the one-day market premium and the 30-day market premium). The resulting transaction statistics for the selected transactions were compared with the corresponding implied transaction statistics for the proposed transaction based on the implied value of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger of approximately $223.1 million, which corresponding implied transaction statistics were calculated using the estimated Closing SWK Net Asset Value provided by SWK management and the annualized net income of SWK (based on fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025) (with net income as a proxy for NII), and using market price information as of October 8, 2025 and August 26, 2025.
KBW’s analysis showed the following concerning the proposed transaction and the selected transactions (excluding the impact of the price-to-LTM NII per share multiples of five of the selected transactions and the price-to-LTM Pre-Mgmt. Fee NII multiples of three of the selected transactions, which multiples were considered to be not meaningful because they were either negative or greater than 40.0x):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Transactions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Proposed Transaction |
|
Low |
|
25th Perc. |
|
Median |
|
Average |
|
75th Perc. |
|
High |
|||||||||||||||
Price / TBV per share |
|
0.95 |
|
x |
|
0.58 |
|
x |
|
0.85 |
x |
|
0.96 |
x |
|
0.93 |
|
x |
|
|
1.00 |
|
x |
|
1.16 |
x |
|||
Price / LTM NII per share |
|
15.9 |
|
x |
|
5.2 |
|
x |
|
8.2 |
x |
|
10.2 |
x |
|
|
11.0 |
|
x |
|
12.1 |
|
x |
|
30.6 |
x |
|||
Price / LTM Pre-Mgmt. Fee NII |
|
N/A |
|
x |
|
3.3 |
|
x |
|
6.3 |
x |
|
7.6 |
x |
|
8.1 |
|
x |
|
8.9 |
|
x |
|
18.9 |
x |
||||
One-Day Market Premium |
|
|
28.0 |
|
% |
|
-4.3 |
|
% |
|
0.5 |
% |
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
|
% |
|
|
35.0 |
|
% |
|
80.1 |
% |
|
Thirty-Day Market Premium |
|
|
28.0 |
|
% |
|
|
-9.0 |
|
% |
|
0.1 |
% |
|
19.9 |
% |
|
20.5 |
|
% |
|
32.1 |
|
% |
|
101.8 |
% |
||
KBW then applied a range of price-to-TBV per share multiples of 0.85x to 1.00x derived from the 25th percentile and 75th percentile multiples of the selected transactions to the estimated Closing SWK Net Asset Value provided by SWK management. KBW also applied a range of price-to-LTM NII per share multiples of 8.23x to 12.14x derived from the 25th percentile and 75th percentile multiples of the selected transactions to the to the annualized net income of SWK (based on fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025). This analysis indicated the following ranges of the implied total equity value of SWK Common Stock, as compared to the implied value of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger of approximately $223.1 million:
|
|
SWK Implied Total Equity Ranges |
Based on estimated Closing SWK Net Asset Value provided by SWK management |
|
$198.5 to $234.6 |
Based on annualized net income of SWK (based on fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025) |
|
$116.4 to $171.7 |
No company or transaction used as a comparison in the above selected transaction analysis is identical to SWK or the proposed transaction. Accordingly, an analysis of these results is not mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies involved.
Wind-Down Analysis of SWK. KBW performed a wind-down analysis of SWK on a standalone basis to estimate a range for the implied equity value of SWK. In this analysis, KBW used financial and operating forecasts and projections relating to the net cash flows of SWK that were provided by SWK management. KBW assumed discount rates ranging from 11.0% to 15.0%. The range of values was derived by calculating the present value of the estimated future net cash flows of SWK over the period from September 30, 2025 through March 31, 2030. This analysis resulted in a range of implied equity values of SWK of approximately $217.3 million to $231.7 million, as compared to the implied value of the aggregate consideration in the First Merger of approximately $223.1 million.
The results of the wind-down analysis are highly dependent on the assumptions that must be made, including net cash flow and discount rate assumptions. The analysis did not purport to be indicative of the actual values or expected values of SWK.
98
Table of Contents
Dividend Discount Analysis of RWAY. KBW performed a dividend discount analysis of RWAY on a standalone basis to estimate ranges for the implied equity value of RWAY. In this analysis, KBW used publicly available consensus “street estimates” of RWAY, including using 2027 estimates in 2028 and 2029. KBW assumed discount rates ranging from 10.0% to 12.0%. Ranges of values were derived by adding (i) the present value of the estimated future dividends of RWAY over the period from the assumed December 31, 2025 closing date of the proposed transaction through December 31, 2029 and (ii) the present value of RWAY’s implied terminal value at the end of such period. KBW derived implied terminal values using two methodologies, one based on estimated December 31, 2029 NAV per share multiples and the other based on estimated calendar year 2029 dividend yields. Using implied terminal values for RWAY calculated by applying a terminal multiple range of 0.70x to 0.90x to RWAY’s estimated NAV per share as of December 31, 2029, this analysis resulted in a range of implied values per share of RWAY Common Stock of approximately $10.44 to $12.95. Using implied terminal values for RWAY calculated by applying a terminal dividend yield range of 15.0% to 17.0% to RWAY’s estimated calendar year 2029 dividends, this analysis resulted in a range of implied values per share of RWAY Common Stock of approximately $9.18 to $10.40.
The dividend discount analysis is a widely used valuation methodology, but the results of such methodology are highly dependent on the assumptions that must be made, including NAV per share and dividend assumptions, terminal values and discount rates. The analysis did not purport to be indicative of the actual values or expected values of RWAY or the pro forma Combined Company.
Relative Contribution Analysis. KBW analyzed the relative standalone contribution of RWAY and SWK to various pro forma balance sheet and income statement items of the combined entity. This analysis did not include purchase accounting adjustments, transaction expenses or deferred financing costs. To perform this analysis, KBW used historical financial data as of or for the periods ended June 30, 2025 of RWAY and SWK. The results of KBW’s analysis are set forth in the following table, which also compares the results of KBW’s analysis with the implied pro forma ownership percentages of RWAY stockholders and SWK stockholders in the Combined Company based on the aggregate stock consideration assumed to be approximately 5.5 million shares of RWAY Common Stock and also with the implied pro forma ownership percentages of RWAY stockholders and SWK stockholders in the Combined Company hypothetically assuming issuance of additional stock consideration, instead of payment of the aggregate cash consideration, for illustrative purposes.
|
|
RWAY as a % of Total |
|
SWK as a % of Total |
||||||
Pro Forma Ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ownership based on aggregate stock consideration assumed to be 5.5 million shares of RWAY Common Stock |
|
86.9 |
|
% |
|
13.1 |
|
% |
||
Illustrative ownership assuming 100% stock consideration (NAV to NAV exchange ratio)(1) |
|
|
68.0 |
|
% |
|
|
32.0 |
|
% |
Balance Sheet Data as of June 30, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
78.5 |
|
% |
|
21.5 |
|
% |
||
Investments at fair value(2) |
|
|
80.8 |
|
% |
|
|
19.2 |
|
% |
Total debt |
|
94.2 |
|
% |
|
5.8 |
|
% |
||
Stockholders' equity |
|
|
66.9 |
|
% |
|
|
33.1 |
|
% |
Tangible book value(3) |
|
68.9 |
|
% |
|
31.1 |
|
% |
||
Income Statement Data for periods ended June 30, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Annualized net income (based on fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025) |
|
79.8 |
|
% |
|
20.2 |
|
% |
||
LTM net income |
|
|
77.5 |
|
% |
|
|
22.5 |
|
% |
Miscellaneous. KBW acted as financial advisor to SWK in connection with the transaction and did not act as an advisor to or agent of any other person in connection with the transaction. As part of its investment banking business, KBW is regularly engaged in the valuation of securities of specialty finance companies in connection with acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for various other purposes. In the ordinary course of KBW and its affiliates’ broker-dealer businesses, KBW and its affiliates may from time to time purchase securities from, and sell securities to, SWK, RWAY and Adviser. In addition, as market makers in securities, KBW and its affiliates may from time to time have a long or short position in, and buy or sell, debt or equity securities of SWK and RWAY for its and their own respective accounts and for the accounts of its and their respective customers and clients.
Pursuant to the KBW engagement agreement, SWK agreed to pay KBW a cash fee currently estimated to be approximately $2.4 million in the aggregate, $300,000 of which became payable to KBW with the rendering of KBW’s opinion and the balance of which is contingent upon the closing of the First Merger. SWK also agreed to reimburse KBW for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and
99
Table of Contents
disbursements incurred in connection with its engagement and to indemnify KBW against certain liabilities relating to or arising out of KBW’s engagement or KBW’s role in connection therewith.
Other than in connection with the present engagement, during the two years preceding the date of KBW’s opinion, KBW did not provide investment banking or financial advisory services to SWK. During the two years preceding the date of KBW’s opinion, KBW provided investment banking and financial advisory services to RWAY and received compensation for such services. KBW acted as a joint book-running manager in connection with RWAY’s November 2023 and May 2024 offerings of common stock. In the past two years, KBW did not provide investment banking or financial advisory services to Adviser. KBW may in the future provide investment banking and financial advisory services to SWK, RWAY, Adviser or other affiliates of Adviser and receive compensation for such services. KBW is acting as financial advisor to the Committee of Independent Directors of the Board of Directors of BC Partners Lending Corporation in connection with the pending acquisition by BC Partners Lending Corporation of Alternative Credit Income Fund. In addition, KBW acted as financial advisor to the Committee of Independent Directors of the Board of Directors of Portman Ridge Finance Corporation in connection with the recently completed acquisition by Portman Ridge Finance Corporation of Logan Ridge Finance Corporation.
Certain Prospective Financial Information
As a matter of course, SWK does not publicly disclose forecasts or projections as to future performance, revenues, earnings or other results of operations due to the inherent uncertainty and subjectivity of the underlying assumptions and estimates. The below financial projections of the value that may be realized in a liquidation as an alternative to pursuing the Merger (the “Dissolution Projections”) was provided by SWK to KBW to use and rely upon in connection with KBW’s opinion to the SWK Board and the financial analyses performed by KBW, as further described above under “The Merger—Opinion of Financial Advisor to SWK.” A summary of the Dissolution Projections, which were reviewed and considered by SWK Board in reaching its recommendations relating to the Merger and the related transactions, is set forth below.
At the direction of the SWK Board, to assist the analysis and decision of the SWK Board with respect to whether to approve the Company’s entry into the Merger Agreement and recommendation by the SWK Board that the Company’s stockholders vote in favor of the Merger Proposal, SWK management prepared Dissolution Projections. The Dissolution Projections assumed a wind-down process whereby the Company would be able to restructure and close operations and complete the dissolution and distribute cash to the stockholders of SWKH in full by the end of first quarter of 2030.
The Company’s estimated liquidation costs contemplate $17.4 million in total operating expenses during the winddown period, including $1.3 million in severance costs and $0.5 million in retention costs, among other insurance and transaction expenses. The Dissolution Projections also assumes (1) calling the SWK Notes at 102% for a total cost of $33.7 million; (2) that cash on hand will be distributed beginning in the fourth quarter of 2025; (3) SWK would delist from Nasdaq in the first quarter of 2027 resulting in lower operating costs thereafter; (4) expected gross credit losses of 1.0% per annum; (5) three severance payouts of ~$0.2M, ~$0.8M and ~$0.3M in the first quarter of 2026, the first quarter of 2027 and the first quarter of 2028, respectively; and (6) the maturity of six portfolio assets, including three large portfolio assets in 2027.
The timing of the distributions, if any, and the distribution of proceeds would depend on factors such as the actual proceeds received for the sale of any of the assets from the SWK portfolio, actual expenses incurred, the amount of wind-down costs, the amount required to settle the Company’s remaining obligations under current contracts, the need to retain employees to facilitate the wind-down, the need to retain the services of outside contractors to assist with the wind-down and the satisfaction by the Company of its remaining obligations (including obligations to continue SEC filings), and the need to retain funds beyond that distribution for unknown or contingent liabilities, each of which could be material and the total amount of which cannot currently be estimated. There can be no assurance that any fees, expenses, contingencies or other obligations that the Company may incur will ultimately be within the range of estimated amounts provided in the Dissolution Projections, that the Dissolution Projections accounts for all possible such fees, expenses, contingencies or other obligations of the Company or that the actual distributions would be ultimately realized at the estimated amounts, if at all.
In addition to the Dissolution Projections, at the direction of SWK, KBW used and relied on certain publicly available consensus “street estimates” of RWAY’s dividend distributions per share for use from 2026 to 2029, as well as certain publicly available consensus “street estimates” of RWAY’s net asset value (NAV) per share for use as of December 31, 2029 (collectively, the “RWAY Projections,” and together with the Dissolution Projections, the “Financial Projections”) in connection with KBW’s opinion to the SWK Board and the financial analyses performed by KBW, as further described above under “The Merger — Opinion of Financial Advisor to SWK.” A summary of the RWAY Projections, which were reviewed and considered by SWK Board in reaching its recommendations relating to the Merger and the related transactions, are set forth below.
100
Table of Contents
The Financial Projections are not being included in this proxy statement, and are not intended to, influence any SWK Stockholder’s decision whether to vote in favor of any proposal contained in this proxy statement/prospectus and are summarized in this proxy statement/prospectus solely to provide the SWK Stockholders with access to certain non-public and other information regarding SWK’s and RWAY’s business considered by the SWK Board and used by KBW for purposes of its opinion and related financial analyses.
Although presented with numerical specificity, the Financial Projections reflect numerous variables, estimates and assumptions at the time the underlying information and projections were prepared, including general business, economic, market and financial conditions, and other matters, and are inherently uncertain. If any of these variables, estimates or assumptions prove to be wrong, the actual results of SWK’s business or winddown and/or RWAY’s business, if the First Merger does not occur, may be materially different from the results reflected in the Financial Projections. SWK Stockholders should read the section entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for additional information regarding the risks inherent in forward-looking information such as the Financial Projections. The Financial Projections do not take into account any events or circumstances after the date they were prepared, including the public announcement of the Mergers and are, by their nature, subjective, uncertain, and susceptible to multiple interpretations and periodic revisions based on actual experience and business developments. Although SWK believes its assumptions to be reasonable, due to the inherent uncertainty of financial projections, SWK expects that differences may exist between actual and projected financial information and that those differences could be material. The information from the Financial Projections should be evaluated, if at all, in conjunction with the historical financial statements and other information regarding SWK and/or RWAY, and there can be no assurance that the variables, estimates and assumptions made in preparing the Financial Projections will prove accurate, that any of the Financial Projections will be realized, or that, if the First Merger is not completed, SWK’s future winddown or dissolution and/or RWAY’s business, if any, will not materially vary from the Financial Projections. The Financial Projections may also differ materially from published analyst estimates and forecasts regarding SWK’s and/or RWAY’s ongoing business.
Accordingly, the inclusion of the Financial Projections and the other information about such projections in this proxy statement should not be regarded as an indication that SWK, KBW or any other recipient of this information considered, or now considers, this information to be necessarily predictive of actual future results, nor should it be deemed an admission or representation by SWK, KBW or any of their respective officers, directors, affiliates, advisors or other representatives with respect to such projections. In particular, the Financial Projections should not be utilized as public guidance. Furthermore, neither the independent registered public accounting firm of SWK, nor any other independent accountant, has audited, reviewed, compiled, examined or performed any procedures with respect to the Financial Projections for the purpose of its inclusion herein, and accordingly, no independent accountant is expressing any opinion or providing any form of assurance with respect thereto for the purpose of this proxy statement.
The Financial Projections were prepared for internal use and were not prepared with a view toward public disclosure or compliance with published guidelines of the SEC regarding projections and GAAP. The Dissolution Projections include net cash flows and the RWAY Projections include dividend distributions and NAV. Such non-GAAP measures as used herein may not be directly comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information presented in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures in the Financial Projections to GAAP financial measures were not provided to the SWK Board or KBW. SEC rules which otherwise would require a reconciliation of a non-GAAP financial measure to a GAAP financial measure for purposes of public disclosure do not apply to non-GAAP financial measures provided to a board of directors or financial advisors in connection with a proposed business combination transaction such as the Mergers, if the disclosure is included in a document such as this proxy statement to comply with requirements under state laws, including case law.
In light of the foregoing and other factors not taken into account in the Financial Projections, and the corresponding uncertainties inherent in financial projections, SWK stockholders are cautioned not to place undue reliance, if any, on the Financial Projections.
101
Table of Contents
Dissolution Projections
(In millions) |
|
Q4 2025 |
|
2026 |
|
2027 |
|
2028 |
|
2029 |
|
Q1 2030 |
||||||
Net cash flows |
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
$ |
55.2 |
|
$ |
120.7 |
|
$ |
69.9 |
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
$ |
7.3 |
RWAY Projections
(Dollar per share) |
|
2026E |
|
2027E |
|
2028E |
|
2029E |
||||
Dividend distribution per share |
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
$ |
1.32(1) |
|
$ |
1.32(1) |
December 31, 2029 NAV per share: $13.93
Regulatory Approvals Required for the Mergers
The obligations of RWAY and SWK to complete the Mergers are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including the condition that all regulatory approvals required by law to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Mergers, have been obtained and remain in full force and effect, and all statutory waiting periods required by applicable law in respect thereof have expired (including expiration of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act). The applicable waiting period under the HSR Act is set to expire at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on December 8, 2025, unless extended or early terminated. RWAY and SWK have agreed to cooperate with each other and use their reasonable best efforts to obtain all licenses, permits, variances, exemptions, approvals, qualifications or orders from any governmental or regulatory authority necessary to consummate the Mergers.
There can be no assurance that such regulatory approvals will be obtained, that such approvals will be received on a timely basis or that such approvals will not impose conditions or requirements that, individually or in the aggregate, would or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, assets or business of the Combined Company following the completion of the Mergers.
Third Party Consents Required for the Mergers
Under the Merger Agreement, RWAY and SWK have agreed to will use their respective reasonable best efforts to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated thereby and to cause the conditions to the First Merger to be satisfied, including using reasonable best efforts to accomplish the following: (i) the obtaining of all necessary actions or non-actions, consents and approvals from governmental authorities or other persons necessary in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the First Merger, and the making of all necessary registrations and filings and the taking of all reasonable steps as may be necessary to obtain an approval from, or to avoid a proceeding by, any governmental authority or other persons necessary in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the First Merger; (ii) the defending of any lawsuits or other legal proceedings, whether judicial or administrative, challenging the Merger Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the First Merger, performed or consummated by such party in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, including seeking to have any stay or temporary restraining order entered by any court or other governmental authority vacated or reversed; and (iii) the execution and delivery of any additional instruments reasonably necessary to consummate the First Merger and any other transactions to be performed or consummated by such party in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement and to carry out fully the purposes of the Agreement.
Appraisal Rights
If the First Merger is consummated, holders of record and beneficial owners of SWK Common Stock who do not vote in favor of the First Merger, who properly demand an appraisal of their shares, who continuously hold (in the case of holders of record) or continuously own (in the case of beneficial owners) their SWK Common Stock through the Effective Time, who otherwise comply with the statutory requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL and who do not withdraw their demands or otherwise lose their rights to appraisal, subject to the conditions thereof, are entitled to seek appraisal of their shares in connection with the First Merger under Section 262. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references in Section 262 and in this summary (i) to a “stockholder” or a “holder of shares” are to a record holder of SWK Common Stock, (ii) to a “beneficial owner” are to a person who is the beneficial owner of SWK Common Stock held
102
Table of Contents
either in voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person, and (iii) to a “person” are to any individual, corporation, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity.
The following discussion is not a complete statement of the law pertaining to appraisal rights under the DGCL and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of Section 262, which may be accessed without subscription or cost at the following publicly available website: https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc09/index.html#262 and is incorporated into this proxy statement/prospectus by reference. The following summary does not constitute any legal or other advice and does not constitute a recommendation that SWK Stockholders or beneficial owners exercise their appraisal rights under Section 262. Holders of record and beneficial owners of SWK Common Stock should carefully review the full text of Section 262 as well as the information discussed below. To the extent there are any inconsistencies between the foregoing summary, on the one hand, and Section 262, on the other hand, Section 262 will govern. Failure to follow the steps required by Section 262 for demanding and perfecting appraisal rights may result in the loss of such rights.
Under Section 262, if the First Merger is completed, holders of record or beneficial owners of SWK Common Stock who (i) properly submit a written demand for appraisal of such holder’s or owner’s SWK Common Stock to SWK prior to the vote on the First Merger at the SWK Special Meeting, (ii) do not vote in favor of the First Merger, (iii) continuously hold (in the case of a holder of record) or own (in the case of a beneficial owner) such SWK Common Stock through the Effective Time, (iv) do not validly withdraw their demands or otherwise lose, waive or fail to perfect their rights to appraisal, and (v) otherwise comply with the statutory requirements and satisfy certain ownership thresholds set forth in Section 262, may be entitled to have their SWK Common Stock appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery if certain conditions set forth in Section 262(g) are satisfied and to receive payment of the “fair value” of their SWK Common Stock, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the First Merger, together with (unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown) interest on the amount determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery to be fair value from the Effective Time through the date of payment of the judgment. If you are a beneficial owner of SWK Common Stock and you wish to exercise appraisal rights in such capacity, in addition to the foregoing requirements, your demand must also (A) reasonably identify the holder of record of the shares for which that demand is made, (B) be accompanied by documentary evidence of your beneficial ownership of such SWK Common Stock and include a statement that such documentary evidence is a true and correct copy of what it purports to be, and (C) provide an address at which you consent to receive notices given by the Combined Company and to be set forth on the verified list required by Section 262(f). However, after an appraisal petition has been filed, the Delaware Court of Chancery, at a hearing to determine persons entitled to appraisal rights, will dismiss appraisal proceedings as to all persons who are otherwise entitled to appraisal rights unless (1) the total number of SWK Common Stock entitled to appraisal exceeds one percent of the outstanding shares of the class of SWK Common Stock eligible for appraisal, or (2) the value of the consideration provided in the First Merger for such total number of shares exceeds $1 million. SWK refers to these conditions herein as the “ownership thresholds.” Unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest on an appraisal award from the Effective Time through the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded quarterly and shall accrue at five percent over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during such period (except that, if at any time before the entry of judgment in the proceeding, the Combined Company makes a voluntary cash payment to each person seeking appraisal, interest will accrue thereafter only upon the sum of (x) the difference, if any, between the amount so paid and the fair value of the shares as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and (y) interest theretofore accrued, unless paid at that time). The Combined Company is under no obligation to make such voluntary cash payment prior to such entry of judgment.
Under Section 262, if the proposed merger for which appraisal rights are provided is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the corporation, not less than twenty (20) days prior to the meeting, must notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record date for notice of such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal rights are available pursuant to Section 262 that appraisal rights are available and must include in the notice either a copy of Section 262 or information directing the stockholders to a publicly available electronic resource at which Section 262 may be accessed without subscription or cost. This proxy statement/prospectus constitutes SWK’s notice to SWK Stockholders that appraisal rights are available in connection with the First Merger, and the full text of Section 262 may be accessed without subscription or cost at the following publicly available website: https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc09/index.html#262. In connection with the First Merger, any holder of record or beneficial owner of SWK Common Stock who wishes to exercise appraisal rights, or who wishes to preserve such holder’s or owner’s right to do so, should review Section 262 carefully. Failure to strictly comply with the requirements of Section 262 in a timely and proper manner will result in the loss of appraisal rights under the DGCL. A stockholder or beneficial owner who loses such holder’s or owner’s appraisal rights will be entitled to receive the per share price described in the Merger Agreement without interest and subject to any applicable withholding taxes. Because of the complexity of the procedures for exercising the right to seek appraisal of SWK Common Stock, SWK believes that if a stockholder or a beneficial owner is considering exercising such rights, that stockholder or beneficial owner should seek the advice of legal counsel.
103
Table of Contents
SWK Stockholders or beneficial owners wishing to exercise the right to seek an appraisal of their SWK Common Stock must do ALL of the following:
Additionally, the demanding stockholder or beneficial owner or another stockholder or beneficial owner who has properly demanded appraisal or the Combined Company must file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such persons within one hundred twenty (120) days after the Effective Time. The Combined Company is under no obligation to file any petition and has no intention of doing so. Accordingly, it is the obligation of SWK Stockholders or beneficial owners to take all necessary action to perfect their appraisal rights in respect of SWK Common Stock within the time prescribed in Section 262.
After an appraisal petition has been filed, the Delaware Court of Chancery, at a hearing to determine persons entitled to appraisal rights, will dismiss appraisal proceedings as to all persons who asserted appraisal rights unless one of the ownership thresholds is met.
Written Demand
A stockholder or beneficial owner wishing to exercise appraisal rights must deliver to SWK, before the vote on the First Merger at the SWK Special Meeting, a written demand for the appraisal of such holder’s or beneficial owner’s SWK Common Stock. In addition, that stockholder or beneficial owner must not vote or submit a proxy in favor of the First Merger. A vote in favor of the First Merger, virtually at the SWK Special Meeting or by proxy (whether by mail or via the Internet or telephone), will constitute a waiver of appraisal rights in respect of the shares so voted and will nullify any previously filed written demands for appraisal with respect to such stockholder’s or beneficial owner’s shares. A stockholder exercising appraisal rights must hold of record SWK Common Stock on the date the written demand for appraisal is made and must continue to hold the shares of record through the Effective Time. A beneficial owner exercising appraisal rights must own SWK Common Stock on the date the written demand for appraisal is made and must continue to own such shares through the Effective Time. For a stockholder, a proxy that is submitted and does not contain voting instructions will, unless revoked, be voted in favor of the First Merger, and it will constitute a waiver of the stockholder’s right of appraisal and will nullify any previously delivered written demand for appraisal. A stockholder or beneficial owner who submits a proxy and who wishes to exercise appraisal rights must submit a proxy containing instructions to vote against the First Merger or abstain from voting on the First Merger. Neither voting against the First Merger nor abstaining from voting or failing to vote on the First Merger will, in and of itself, constitute a written demand for appraisal satisfying the requirements of Section 262. The written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and separate from any proxy or vote on the First Merger. A stockholder’s or beneficial owner’s failure to make the written demand prior to the taking of the vote on the First Merger at the SWK Special Meeting will constitute a waiver of appraisal rights.
A holder of record of SWK Common Stock is entitled to demand appraisal for the shares registered in that holder’s name. A demand for appraisal in respect of SWK Common Stock by a holder of record must reasonably inform SWK of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand an appraisal of such stockholder’s shares.
A beneficial owner may, in such person’s name, demand in writing an appraisal of such beneficial owner’s SWK Common Stock. A demand for appraisal in respect of such SWK Common Stock should be executed by or on behalf of the beneficial owner and must
104
Table of Contents
reasonably inform SWK of the identity of the beneficial owner and that the beneficial owner intends thereby to demand an appraisal of such owner’s shares. The demand made by such beneficial owner must also (i) reasonably identify the holder of record of SWK Common Stock for which the demand is made, (ii) be accompanied by documentary evidence of such beneficial owner’s beneficial ownership of stock and a statement that such documentary evidence is a true and correct copy of what it purports to be, and (iii) provide an address at which such beneficial owner consents to receive notices given by the Combined Company and to be set forth on the verified list required by Section 262(f). If the shares with respect to which a demand is made are owned of record or beneficially owned in a fiduciary capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, such demand should be executed by or on behalf of the record owner or beneficial owner in such capacity, and if the shares are owned of record or beneficially owned by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy and tenancy in common, the demand should be executed by or on behalf of all joint holders of record or beneficial owners. An authorized agent, including an authorized agent for two (2) or more joint stockholders or beneficial owners, as applicable, may execute a demand for appraisal on behalf of a stockholder or beneficial owner, as applicable; however, the agent must identify the stockholder or stockholders or beneficial owner or owners and expressly disclose that, in executing the demand, the agent is acting as agent for the stockholder or stockholders or beneficial owner or owners, as applicable. A stockholder, such as a broker, bank or other nominee, who holds shares as a nominee for others, may exercise his, her or its right of appraisal with respect to shares held for one or more beneficial owners, while not exercising this right for other beneficial owners. In that case, the written demand should state the number of shares as to which appraisal is sought. Where no number of shares is expressly mentioned, the demand will be presumed to cover all shares held in the name of the stockholder.
All written demands for appraisal pursuant to Section 262 should be mailed or delivered to:
SWK Holdings Corporation
5956 Sherry Lane
Suite 650
Dallas, TX, 75225
Attention: Corporate Secretary
If a person who has made a demand for an appraisal in accordance with Section 262 shall deliver to the Combined Company a written withdrawal of such person’s demand for an appraisal in respect of some or all of such person’s SWK Common Stock in accordance with subsection (e) of Section 262, either within sixty (60) days after the Effective Time or thereafter with the written approval of the Combined Company, then the right of such person to an appraisal of such shares subject to the withdrawal shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an appraisal proceeding in the Delaware Court of Chancery shall not be dismissed as to any person without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just; provided, however that any person who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party may withdraw such person’s demand for appraisal and accept the terms offered upon the First Merger within sixty (60) days after the Effective Time.
Notice by the Combined Company
If the First Merger is completed, within ten (10) days after the Effective Time, the Combined Company will notify each record holder of SWK Common Stock who has properly made a written demand for appraisal pursuant to Section 262 and who has not voted in favor of the First Merger, and any beneficial owner who has properly demanded appraisal in accordance with Section 262, that the First Merger has become effective and the Effective Time thereof.
Filing a Petition for Appraisal
Within one hundred twenty (120) days after the Effective Time, but not thereafter, the Combined Company or any person who has demanded appraisal of such person’s shares and otherwise complied with Section 262 and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery, with a copy served on the Combined Company in the case of a petition filed by a person, demanding a determination of the “fair value” of SWK Common Stock held by all persons entitled to appraisal. The Combined Company is under no obligation, and has no present intention, to file a petition, and SWK Stockholders and beneficial owners should not assume that the Combined Company will file a petition or initiate any negotiations with respect to the “fair value” of SWK Common Stock. Accordingly, any persons who desire to have their shares appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery should initiate all necessary action to perfect their appraisal rights in respect of their SWK Common Stock within the time and in the manner prescribed in Section 262. The failure to file such a petition within the period specified in Section 262 could nullify a previous written demand for appraisal.
105
Table of Contents
Within one hundred twenty (120) days after the Effective Time, any person who has complied with the requirements for an appraisal of such person’s shares pursuant to Section 262 and who is entitled to appraisal rights thereunder will be entitled, upon written request, to receive from the Combined Company a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the First Merger and with respect to which SWK has received demands for appraisal, and the aggregate number of stockholders or beneficial owners holding or owning such shares (provided that, where a beneficial owner makes a demand pursuant to Section 262, the holder of record of such shares will not be considered a separate stockholder holding such shares for purposes of such aggregate number). The Combined Company must give this statement to the requesting person within ten (10) days after receipt by the Combined Company of the written request for such a statement or within ten (10) days after the expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal, whichever is later.
If a petition for an appraisal is duly filed by a person and a copy thereof is served upon the Combined Company, the Combined Company will then be obligated within twenty (20) days after such service to file in the office of the Delaware Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all persons who have demanded appraisal for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the Combined Company. The Delaware Court of Chancery may order that notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition be given to the Combined Company and all of the persons shown on the verified list at the addresses stated therein. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication will be approved by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and the costs of any such notices will be borne by the Combined Company.
At the hearing on such petition, the Delaware Court of Chancery will determine the persons who have complied with Section 262 and who have become entitled to appraisal rights thereunder. The Delaware Court of Chancery will dismiss appraisal proceedings as to all of the persons who are otherwise entitled to appraisal rights unless one of the ownership thresholds is met.
Determination of Fair Value
After the Delaware Court of Chancery determines the persons entitled to appraisal, and that at least one of the ownership thresholds above has been satisfied, then the appraisal proceeding will be conducted in accordance with the rules of the Delaware Court of Chancery, including any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through such proceeding, the Delaware Court of Chancery will determine the “fair value” of SWK Common Stock, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the First Merger, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining fair value, the Delaware Court of Chancery will take into account all relevant factors. Unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the Effective Time through the date of payment of the judgment will be compounded quarterly and will accrue at five percent over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the Effective Time and the date of payment of the judgment. However, the Combined Company has the right, at any time prior to the Delaware Court of Chancery’s entry of judgment in the proceedings, to make a voluntary cash payment to each person seeking appraisal. If the Combined Company makes a voluntary cash payment pursuant to subsection (h) of Section 262, interest will accrue thereafter only on the sum of (i) the difference, if any, between the amount paid by the Combined Company in such voluntary cash payment and the fair value of the shares as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and (ii) interest accrued before such voluntary cash payment, unless paid at that time. In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., Delaware Supreme Court discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that “proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered, and that “[f]air price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company.” The Delaware Supreme Court stated that, in making this determination of fair value, the court must consider market value, asset value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other facts that could be ascertained as of the date of the Merger that throw any light on future prospects of the merged corporation. The Delaware Supreme Court has indicated that transaction price is one of the relevant factors the Delaware Court of Chancery may consider in determining fair value and that, absent deficiencies in the sale process, the transaction price should be given “considerable weight.” Section 262 provides that fair value is to be “exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger.” In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a “narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known elements of value,” but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Supreme Court of Delaware also stated that “elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered.”
Upon application by the Combined Company or by any person entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Delaware Court of Chancery may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the persons entitled to an appraisal. Any person whose name appears on the verified list may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that such person is not entitled to appraisal rights. When the fair value of SWK Common Stock is determined, the Delaware Court of Chancery will direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with interest, if any, by the Combined Company to the persons entitled thereto. Payment will be made to each such person upon such terms and conditions as the Delaware Court of Chancery may order. The Delaware Court of Chancery’s decree may be enforced as other decrees in such court may be enforced.
106
Table of Contents
Persons considering seeking appraisal should be aware that the fair value of their shares as so determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery could be more than, the same as or less than the consideration they would receive pursuant to the First Merger if they did not seek appraisal of their shares and that an opinion of an investment banking firm as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration payable in a merger is not an opinion as to, and does not in any manner address, fair value under Section 262. Although SWK believes that the per share price is fair, no representation is made as to the outcome of the appraisal of fair value as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and holders of record and beneficial owners of SWK Common Stock should recognize that such an appraisal could result in a determination of a value higher or lower than, or the same as, the per share price. Neither SWK nor RWAY anticipates offering more than the per share price to any stockholder or beneficial owner exercising appraisal rights, and each of SWK and RWAY reserves the right to make a voluntary cash payment pursuant to subsection (h) of Section 262 and to assert, in any appraisal proceeding, that for purposes of Section 262, the fair value of a share of SWK Common Stock is less than the per share price. If a petition for appraisal is not timely filed, neither of the ownership thresholds above has been satisfied in respect of persons seeking appraisal rights or other requirements imposed by Section 262 to seek and perfect appraisal are not satisfied, then the right to an appraisal will cease. The costs of the appraisal proceedings (which do not include attorneys’ fees or the fees and expenses of experts) may be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and taxed upon the parties as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable under the circumstances. Upon application of a person whose name appears on the list filed by the Combined Company pursuant to Section 262(f) who participated in the proceeding and incurred expenses in connection therewith, the Delaware Court of Chancery may also order that all or a portion of such expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney’s fees and the fees and expenses of experts, be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal not dismissed pursuant to subsection (k) of Section 262 or subject to such an award pursuant to a reservation of judgment under such subsection (a “Reservation”). In the absence of such an order, each party bears its own expenses.
If any person who demands appraisal of his, her or its SWK Common Stock under Section 262 fails to perfect, or loses or validly withdraws, such person’s right to appraisal, such person’s SWK Common Stock will be deemed to have been converted at the Effective Time into the right to receive the per share price as provided in the Merger Agreement. A person will fail to perfect, or effectively lose or withdraw, such person’s right to appraisal if no petition for appraisal is filed within one hundred twenty (120) days after the Effective Time, if neither of the ownership thresholds above has been satisfied in respect of persons seeking appraisal rights or if the person delivers to the Combined Company a written withdrawal of such person’s demand for appraisal in accordance with Section 262.
From and after the Effective Time, no person who has demanded appraisal rights with respect to some or all of such person’s shares in compliance with Section 262 will be entitled to vote such SWK Common Stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior to the Effective Time); provided, however, that if no petition for an appraisal is filed within the time provided in Section 262, or if such person delivers to the Combined Company a written withdrawal of such person’s demand for an appraisal in respect of some or all of such person’s shares within sixty (60) days after the Effective Time, then the right of such person to an appraisal of the shares subject to the withdrawal will cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Delaware Court of Chancery will be dismissed as to any person without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just, including, without limitation, a Reservation; provided, however, that the foregoing will not affect the right of any person who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such person’s demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the First Merger within sixty (60) days after the Effective Time.
To the extent there are any inconsistencies between the foregoing summary, on the one hand, and Section 262, on the other hand, Section 262 will govern.
Failure to comply strictly with all of the procedures set forth in Section 262 will result in the loss of a person’s statutory appraisal rights. In that event, you will be entitled to receive the per share price for your dissenting shares in accordance with the Merger Agreement, without interest and subject to any applicable withholding taxes. Consequently, any person wishing to exercise appraisal rights is encouraged to consult legal counsel before attempting to exercise those rights.
107
Table of Contents
DESCRIPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following summary, which includes the material terms of the Merger Agreement, is qualified by reference to the complete text of the Merger Agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus. This summary does not purport to be complete and may not contain all of the information about the Merger Agreement that is important to you. RWAY and SWK encourage you to read the Merger Agreement carefully and in its entirety.
Structure of the Mergers
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, and in accordance with the DGCL, at the Effective Time (as defined below), SWK will be merged with and into Acquisition Sub, where the separate existence of SWK will cease and Acquisition Sub will continue as the surviving company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of RWAY. Immediately following the Effective Time, Acquisition Sub will be merged with and into Intermediary Sub, where the separate existence of Acquisition Sub will cease and Intermediary Sub will continue as the surviving company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of RWAY and will continue its existence in accordance with the DGCL. Immediately following the Second Effective Time, Intermediary Sub will be merged with and into RWAY, where the separate existence of Intermediary Sub will cease and RWAY will continue as the surviving company and will continue its existence as a corporation under the laws of the State of Maryland.
Closing; Completion of the Mergers
It is currently expected that the Mergers will be completed promptly following the receipt of the required stockholder approval at the SWK Special Meeting and satisfaction or waiver of the other Closing conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement.
On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, the Closing will take place by remote communication and by the exchange of signatures by electronic transmission on a date that no later than three (3) business days after the satisfaction or waiver of the latest to occur of the conditions to Closing set forth in the Merger Agreement (other than those conditions that by their terms are to be satisfied at the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of such conditions), unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties to the Merger Agreement.
The First Merger will become effective as set forth in the certificate of ownership and merger that will be filed with, and accepted for record by, the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. The Second Merger will become effective as set forth in the certificate of ownership and merger that will be filed with, and accepted for record by, the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. The Third Merger will become effective as set forth in (i) the articles of merger that will be filed with, and accepted for record by, the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland and (ii) the certificate of ownership and merger that will be filed with, and accepted for record by, the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. Assuming approval of the Merger Proposal presented at the SWK Special Meeting and the other conditions to the Closing are satisfied or waived, RWAY and SWK expect to complete the Mergers in the first quarter or early second quarter of 2026.
Merger Consideration
At the Effective Time, each share of SWK Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, other than Cancelled Shares, will be converted, at the election of the respective SWK Stockholder, into the right to receive (A) (i) the Per Share Cash Consideration or (ii) the Per Share Stock Consideration plus (B) the Per Share Guaranteed Cash Payment.
Each award of restricted SWK Common Stock granted under SWK’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (“SWK Restricted Stock Award”) that is outstanding and unvested as of the Effective Time, including those held by SWK’s directors and executive officers, will vest in full immediately prior to the Effective Time and each share of SWK Common Stock subject to an outstanding SWK Restricted Stock Award will be accelerated and cancelled in exchange for the right to receive the Total Per Share Consideration, subject to applicable withholding.
Net Asset Value Calculation
SWK has engaged Kroll, LLC (the “Valuation Firm”) for the purposes of providing good faith determination of a valuation range with respect to each of SWK’s portfolio assets (the “SWK Portfolio Assets”) as of 5:00 p.m. New York City Time on September 30, 2025 and on the Determination Date (each such determination of a valuation range with respect to each of the SWK Portfolio Assets, an “Asset Valuation Range”) and has prepared and delivered to the Valuation Firm SWK’s calculation of the SWK Marks as of 5:00 p.m.
108
Table of Contents
New York City Time on September 30, 2025. On November 17, 2025, the Valuation Firm delivered to SWK the Valuation Firm’s good faith determination of the Asset Valuation Range for each Company Portfolio Asset as of 5:00 p.m. New York City Time on September 30, 2025 and promptly thereafter delivered to RWAY SWK’s good faith determination (in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement) of the “Adjudicated Portfolio Value,” which will be the fair market valuation of the SWK Portfolio Assets, on an aggregate basis, as determined based on the Valuation Firm’s good faith determination of each SWK Portfolio Asset’s Asset Valuation Range; provided, that with respect to each SWK Portfolio Asset, (A) if the corresponding SWK Mark is higher than the highest value included within the applicable Asset Valuation Range, then the value of such SWK Portfolio Asset will be deemed to be the highest value included within such Asset Valuation Range; (B) if the corresponding SWK Mark is less than the lowest value included within the applicable Asset Valuation Range, then the value of such SWK Portfolio Asset will be deemed to be the lowest value included within such Asset Valuation Range and (C) if the corresponding SWK Mark is within the applicable Asset Valuation Range, then the value of such SWK Portfolio Asset will be deemed to be the SWK Mark for such SWK Portfolio Asset (the deemed value of each such SWK Portfolio Asset pursuant to (A), (B) or (C), the “Adjudicated Asset Value”).
Letter of Election and Transmittal
Substantially concurrently with the mailing of SWK’s DEFM-14A, RWAY will cause an exchange agent (the “Exchange Agent”) to mail to SWK Stockholders of record a letter of election and transmittal (“Letter of Election and Transmittal”) pursuant to which SWK Stockholders are entitled to make an Election to receive, with respect to all or any portion of shares of SWK Common Stock held by such holder, the Per Share Cash Consideration. With respect to each share held by a SWK Stockholder of record with respect to which such holder does not make an Election, such holder will receive the Per Share Stock Consideration; provided, that with respect to any record holder of shares of SWK Common Stock who at the record date who does not make an Election with respect to any shares held by such holder (a “Non-Election Holder”), such holder will be deemed to have made an Election with respect to a percentage of the total shares of SWK Common Stock held by such Non-Election Holder equal to a number, the numerator of which will be the Aggregate Cash Consideration (as defined and calculated in accordance with the Merger Agreement), and the denominator of which will be the Closing SWK Net Asset Value (i.e. in proportion to the aggregate cash consideration and aggregate stock consideration payable in the First Merger). Elections indicated on such holder’s Letter of Election and Transmittal must be received by the Exchange Agent by the election deadline indicated on the form. In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, the election deadline will be no later than five business days preceding the Closing Date or such other date as mutually agreed to by SWK and RWAY.
If, after giving effect to the Elections, the aggregate number of shares of RWAY Common Stock to be issued by RWAY in the First Merger (the “Proposed Aggregate Stock Issuance Amount”) exceeds the Total Stock Consideration (as defined and calculated in accordance with the Merger Agreement), then the number of non-electing shares will be reduced (without any action on the part of any holder of SWK Common Stock) by converting non-electing shares into electing shares until the Proposed Aggregate Stock Issuance Amount is equal to the Total Stock Consideration (determined on a whole-share basis). Any such reduction in the number of non-electing shares shall be applied among all stockholders, pro rata based on the aggregate number of non-electing shares held by each such stockholder in proportion to the total number of non-electing shares.
If, after giving effect to the Elections, the aggregate amount of cash (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, cash in lieu of fractional shares) to be issued by RWAY in the First Merger (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, the Guaranteed Cash Payment (the “Proposed Cash Consideration”)) exceeds the Aggregate Cash Consideration, then the number of electing shares shall be reduced (without any action on the part of any holder of SWK Common Stock) by converting electing shares into non-electing shares until the Proposed Cash Consideration is equal to the Aggregate Cash Consideration (determined on a whole-share basis). Any such reduction in the number of electing shares shall be applied among all stockholders, pro rata based on the aggregate number of electing shares held by each such stockholder in proportion to the total number of electing shares.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, each holder of record of a Certificate that immediately prior to the Effective Time represented outstanding shares of SWK Common Stock is required to return a duly completed and validly executed Letter of Election and Transmittal together with their stock certificates representing SWK Common Stock and such other documents required pursuant to the instructions therein in exchange for (i) payment of the applicable Total Per Share Consideration in respect of each share of SWK Common Stock previously represented by such Certificates, (ii) any dividends payable in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement and (iii) any cash paid in lieu of fractional shares of RWAY Common Stock payable pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement.
Upon surrender of a Certificate (or affidavit of loss in lieu thereof) for cancellation to the Exchange Agent together with a Letter of Election and Transmittal, duly completed and validly executed in accordance with the instructions thereto, and such other documents as may be required pursuant to such instructions, the holder of such Certificate will be entitled to receive in exchange therefor, and RWAY will cause the Exchange Agent to pay and deliver in exchange thereof as promptly as practicable but in any event within two (2) business days following the later to occur of (i) the Effective Time or (ii) the Exchange Agent’s receipt of such Certificate (or affidavit of loss in
109
Table of Contents
lieu thereof), such duly completed and validly executed Letter of Election and Transmittal and such other documents, (A) payment of the applicable Total Per Share Consideration in respect of each share of SWK Common Stock previously represented by such Certificates (provided that any Per Share Stock Consideration will be in a whole number of shares of RWAY Common Stock in book-entry form), (B) any dividends payable or other distributions payable pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and (C) any cash paid in lieu of fractional shares of RWAY Common Stock payable pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, and the Certificates (or affidavits of loss in lieu thereof) so surrendered will be forthwith canceled. The Exchange Agent will accept such Certificates (or affidavits of loss in lieu thereof) upon compliance with such reasonable terms and conditions as the Exchange Agent may impose to effect an orderly exchange thereof in accordance with normal exchange practices. No interest will be paid or accrued for the benefit of holders of Certificates or Book-Entry Shares on the cash payable upon the surrender of the Certificates.
Conversion of Shares of SWK Common Stock; Exchange of SWK Certificates or SWK Book-Entry Shares
At the Effective Time, each share of SWK Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than Cancelled Shares) will be converted into the right to receive the Total Per Share Consideration. Each such share of SWK Common Stock will no longer be outstanding and will be automatically cancelled and cease to exist as of the Effective Time, and each holder of a certificate (“Certificate”) or a book-entry share (“Book-Entry Share”) that immediately prior to the Effective Time represented an issued and outstanding share of SWK Common Stock, will cease to have any rights with respect to such Certificate or Book-Entry Share other than the right to receive the Total Per Share Consideration and any dividends payable in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement upon surrender of such Certificate or Book-Entry Share in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement.
If any Certificate was lost, stolen or destroyed, the holder, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by claiming such Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if required by SWK or RWAY, the posting by the holder of a bond, in a reasonable amount as SWK or RWAY may direct, as indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with respect to such Certificate, the Exchange Agent will deliver in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate, the Merger Consideration to which the holder thereof is entitled under terms of the Merger Agreement, any unpaid dividends on RWAY Common Stock and any cash paid in lieu of fractional shares of RWAY Common Stock.
After the Effective Time, the stock transfer books of SWK will be closed, and there will be no further transfers on the stock transfer books of SWK of the shares of SWK Common Stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time.
As soon as reasonably practicable following the Effective Time and in any event not later than the second business day thereafter, RWAY will cause the Exchange Agent to issue and send to each holder of Book-Entry Shares that were converted into the right to receive the Total Per Share Consideration that each holder is entitled to receive pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, without such holder being required to deliver a Certificate or an executed Letter of Election and Transmittal to the Exchange Agent. For the avoidance of doubt, holders of Book-Entry Shares are not required to return a Letter of Election and Transmittal in order to receive payment of the Total Per Share Consideration at the Closing; though if such holder of Book-Entry Shares desires to elect the Per Share Cash Consideration rather than the Per Share Stock consideration with respect to any or all of such Book-Entry Shares, such holder should complete the Election portion of the Letter of Election and Transmittal and return it to the Exchange Agent prior to the election deadline.
Withholding
RWAY, SWK and the Exchange Agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from any amounts payable to any holder of SWK Common Stock such amounts as it determines are required to be deducted and withheld with respect to the making of such payment under applicable tax laws. If it is determined that any withholding is required, RWAY, SWK and the Exchange Agent will use reasonable best efforts to give notice to any holders of SWK Common Stock and reasonably cooperate with the holders to reduce the amount of, or eliminate the necessity for, such withholding. To the extent that amounts are withheld and paid over to the appropriate governmental entity, such withheld amounts will be treated as having been paid to SWK Stockholders from whom they were withheld.
Representations and Warranties
The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties by each of RWAY, Intermediary Sub and Acquisition Sub, on the one hand, and SWK, on the other hand, subject to specific exceptions and qualifications, relating to, among other things:
110
Table of Contents
111
Table of Contents
The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties by the Adviser, subject to specified exceptions and qualifications, relating to:
These representations and warranties were made as of specific dates, may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in connection with negotiating the terms of the Merger Agreement and may have been included in the Merger Agreement for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties rather than to establish matters as facts. The Merger Agreement is described in, and included as Annex A to, this document only to provide you with information regarding its terms and conditions and not to provide any other factual information regarding the parties or their respective businesses. Accordingly, the representations and warranties and other provisions of the Merger Agreement should not be read alone, but instead should be read only in conjunction with the information provided elsewhere in this document.
For purposes of the Merger Agreement, “material adverse effect” with respect to RWAY, SWK or the Adviser, as applicable, means any fact, circumstance, event, change, effect or occurrence that would, or would reasonably be expected to be materially adverse to (1) the business, condition (financial or otherwise), properties, liabilities, assets or results of operations of such party and its consolidated subsidiaries, or (2) the ability of such party to timely perform its material obligations under the Merger Agreement or consummate the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated thereby. None of the following facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or occurrences will constitute or be taken into account in determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred or is reasonably expected to occur with respect to clause (1) in the immediately preceding sentence:
The facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects and occurrences set forth in the first two bullets in the immediately preceding paragraph will otherwise be taken into account in determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred to the extent such facts, circumstances, events, changes, effects or occurrences have a materially disproportionate adverse impact on such party and its consolidated subsidiaries, taken as whole, relative to other participants in the industries in which such party operates.
Conduct of Business Pending Completion of the Mergers
112
Table of Contents
In addition, until the earlier of the Effective Time and the date, if any, on which the Merger Agreement is terminated, each of RWAY and SWK has agreed that, except as may be required by law, as expressly permitted by the Merger Agreement or as previously disclosed, and acting in a manner consistent with the immediately preceding paragraph, it will not, and will not permit any of its consolidated subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, without the prior written consent of SWK or RWAY, as applicable (which prior written consent will not be unreasonably delayed, conditioned or withheld):
113
Table of Contents
114
Table of Contents
Other Covenants
SWK Stockholder Approval
SWK has agreed to hold the SWK Special Meeting no later than thirty-five (35) calendar days following the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part of solely for the purpose of obtaining the approval of SWK Stockholders of the Merger Proposal. Subject to any SWK Adverse Recommendation Change, SWK will be required to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain from SWK Stockholders the vote required to approve the Merger Proposal.
Indemnification
RWAY, Intermediary Sub and Acquisition Sub have agreed that all rights to exculpation and indemnification for acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time, whether asserted or claimed prior to, at or after the Effective Time (including any matters arising in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement), existing as of the date of the Merger Agreement in favor of the current or former directors, officers, managers, or employees, as the case may be, of SWK, its subsidiaries or SWK’s affiliates (collectively, the “D&O Indemnified Parties”) as provided in their respective organizational documents as in effect on the date of the Merger Agreement or in any contract disclosed or made available to RWAY prior to the date of the Merger Agreement will survive the Merger and shall continue in full force and effect.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law and as required by the organizational documents of SWK or its subsidiaries as in effect on the date of the Merger Agreement or in any contract disclosed or made available to RWAY prior to the date of the Merger Agreement, RWAY has agreed to:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Merger Agreement, RWAY will not settle or compromise or consent to the entry of any judgment or otherwise seek termination with respect to any claim, proceeding or investigation, unless such settlement, compromise, consent or termination includes an unconditional release of all of the D&O Indemnified Parties covered by the claim, proceeding or investigation from all liability arising out of such claim, proceeding or investigation.
SWK will purchase, and fully prepay immediately prior to the Effective Time, to be effective as of the Closing, a six (6) year “tail” policy, on terms and conditions no less advantageous to the D&O Indemnified Parties than the existing directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and fiduciary insurance maintained by SWK and its subsidiaries as of the date of the Merger Agreement, covering claims arising from facts, events, acts or omissions that occurred at or prior to the Effective Time, including the transactions contemplated thereby (“D&O Insurance”). RWAY will not, and will not permit its subsidiaries to, take any action that would reasonably be expected to prejudice the rights of, or otherwise reasonably be expected to impede recovery by, the beneficiaries of any such insurance, whether in respect of claims arising before or after the Effective Time.
115
Table of Contents
No Solicitation
SWK has agreed to, and to cause its subsidiaries and its and their representatives to, (i) immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing solicitation of, or discussions or negotiations with, any third party relating to any Competing Proposal (as defined below) or any inquiry, discussion, offer or request that could reasonably be expected to lead to a Competing Proposal (an “Inquiry”) and immediately terminate all physical and electronic data room access previously granted to any such third party, (ii) request the prompt return or destruction of all confidential information previously furnished to any such third party with respect to any Competing Proposal or Inquiry and (iii) not terminate, waive, amend, release or modify any provision of any confidentiality or “standstill” agreement to which it or any of its affiliates or representatives is a party with respect to any Competing Proposal or Inquiry.
In addition, except as otherwise expressly provided in the Merger Agreement, until the Effective Time (or until the earlier termination of the Merger Agreement), SWK shall not, and shall cause its subsidiaries and its and their representatives not to, directly or indirectly:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to the date that the SWK Stockholders approve the Merger Proposal, in the event that SWK (or its representatives on SWK’s behalf) receives directly or indirectly a written Inquiry or a written Competing Proposal from any third party that (i) the SWK Board determines in good faith to be bona fide, (ii) was unsolicited and (iii) did not otherwise result from a breach of the no solicitation provision of the Merger Agreement, SWK and the SWK Board and its representatives may engage or participate in negotiations or discussions with, or furnish any information and other access to, any third party making such Inquiry or Competing Proposal and its representatives and affiliates if the SWK Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisor) that:
provided that (x) prior to furnishing any information concerning SWK and its subsidiaries SWK receives from such person, to the extent such person is not already subject to a confidentiality agreement that SWK entered into prior to the date of the Merger Agreement or containing confidentiality terms that are not materially less favorable in the aggregate to SWK than those contained in the existing confidentiality agreement between BC Partners Advisors L.P. and SWK (the “Confidentiality Agreement”) (unless SWK offers to amend the Confidentiality Agreement to reflect such more favorable terms) (an “Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement”), and (y) SWK shall promptly provide or make available to RWAY (I) an unredacted copy of each such Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement and (II) all non-public information concerning it or its subsidiaries that it provides to any third party given such access that was not previously made available to RWAY or its representatives.
Neither SWK nor the SWK Board nor any committee thereof shall (w) withhold or withdraw, or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to RWAY, Intermediary Sub or Acquisition Sub, or propose publicly to withhold or withdraw, to or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to RWAY, Intermediary Sub or Acquisition Sub, the SWK Board Recommendation, (x) fail to include in this proxy statement/prospectus, the SWK Board Recommendation, (y) approve, determine to be advisable or recommend, or propose publicly to approve, determine to be advisable or recommend, any Competing Proposal or (z) resolve, agree or publicly propose to take any such actions (each such action in (w), (x), (y) and (z) being referred to as a “SWK Adverse Recommendation Change”) and, except as expressly provided in the Merger Agreement, neither the SWK Board nor any committee thereof shall approve or recommend, and SWK shall not (and shall cause each of its subsidiaries not to) execute or enter into, any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding,
116
Table of Contents
agreement in principle, acquisition agreement, merger agreement, option agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement or other contract or agreement, in each case constituting or with respect to, any Competing Proposal or Inquiry (each, an “Alternative Acquisition Agreement”), in each case other than an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement as and to the extent provided in the Merger Agreement, and neither the SWK Board nor any committee thereof shall resolve, agree or publicly propose to take any such actions.
Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence, at any time prior to the receipt of SWK Stockholders’ approval of the Merger Proposal, the SWK Board may, if SWK has received a Competing Proposal (as defined below) after the date of the Merger Agreement that (i) the SWK Board has determined in good faith to be bona fide, (ii) was unsolicited, (iii) did not otherwise result from a breach of SWK’s non-solicitation obligations under the Merger Agreement and (iv) the SWK Board has determined in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel) constitutes a Superior Proposal, (A) make a SWK Adverse Recommendation Change or (B) authorize, adopt or approve such Superior Proposal and cause SWK to enter into a binding definitive agreement providing for the consummation of such Superior Proposal concurrently with the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with the corresponding termination right and, provided that:
Nothing contained in the Merger Agreement shall be deemed to prohibit SWK or the SWK Board or any committee thereof from (i) complying with its disclosure obligations under applicable law or applicable NASDAQ rules and regulations, including taking and disclosing to its stockholders a position contemplated by Rule 14d-9 or Rule 14e-2(a) under the Exchange Act or (ii) making any “stop-look-and-listen” communication to stockholders of SWK pursuant to Rule 14d 9(f) under the Exchange Act; provided, however, that any disclosure made as permitted under the non-solicitation provisions of the Merger Agreement (other than any “stop-look-and-listen” communication or a factually accurate public statement by SWK that describes SWK’s receipt of a Competing Proposal and the operation of the Merger Agreement with respect thereto) that relates to a Competing Proposal shall not be deemed to be a SWK Adverse Recommendation Change provided that any such disclosure does not contain a SWK Adverse Recommendation Change.
SWK shall promptly (and in any event within twenty-four (24) hours of receipt) advise RWAY in writing in the event that it or any of its subsidiaries or any of its or their representatives receives any Inquiry or Competing Proposal from any third party, in each case together with a description of the material terms and conditions of and facts surrounding any such Inquiry or Competing Proposal, the identity of the third party making such Inquiry or Competing Proposal and a copy of any written proposal, offer, draft agreement, term sheet or other analogous agreement provided by such third party. SWK shall keep RWAY reasonably informed (orally and in writing) on a timely basis of the status and details (including within twenty-four (24) hours after the occurrence of any amendment, modification, development, discussion or negotiation) of any such Inquiry or Competing Proposal, including furnishing copies of any written inquiries, correspondence and draft documentation, and written summaries of any material oral inquiries or discussions. Without limiting any of the foregoing, SWK shall promptly (and in any event within twenty-four (24) hours) notify RWAY in writing if it determines to begin providing information or to engage in discussions or negotiations concerning an Inquiry or Competing Proposal and shall in no event begin providing such information or engaging in such discussions or negotiations prior to providing such notice.
117
Table of Contents
Related Definitions
For purposes of the Merger Agreement:
Access to Information
Upon reasonable notice, except as may otherwise be restricted by applicable law or as would cause significant competitive harm, SWK will, and will cause its consolidated subsidiaries to, afford to the directors, officers, accountants, counsel, advisors and other Representatives of the other party, reasonable access, during normal business hours during the period prior to the Effective Time, to its properties, books, agents, and records and, during such period, such party will, and will cause its consolidated subsidiaries to, make available to RWAY all other information concerning its business and properties as the other party may reasonably request, subject to certain exceptions relating to confidentiality and attorney-client privilege or any similar privilege or protection.
Publicity
Except as permitted by the non-solicitation provisions of the Merger Agreement, and prior to any SWK Adverse Recommendation change, SWK, RWAY and the Adviser each will consult with the others before issuing or causing the publication of any press release or other public announcement with respect to the Merger Agreement, the Mergers or the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, except as may be required by applicable law or the rules and regulations of NASDAQ.
Takeover Statutes and Provisions
None of RWAY, Intermediary Sub, Acquisition Sub, or SWK will take any action that would cause the First Merger and related transactions to be subject to the requirements imposed by any takeover statute, and each of RWAY and SWK will take all necessary steps within its control to exempt (or ensure the continued exemption of) such transactions from, or if necessary challenge the validity or applicability of, any applicable takeover statute.
118
Table of Contents
Stockholder Litigation
The parties to the Merger Agreement will give each other prompt written notice of (a) any notice or other communication received by such party from any governmental authority in connection with the Merger Agreement, the Mergers or the transactions contemplated thereby, or from any person alleging that their consent is or may be required in connection with the Mergers or the transactions contemplated thereby, if the subject matter of such communication or the failure of such party to obtain such consent could be material to the parties, (b) any claims, investigations or legal proceedings commenced or to such party’s knowledge, threatened against such party or any of its subsidiaries which relate to the Merger Agreement, the Mergers or the transactions contemplated thereby and (c) any fact, circumstance or development of which any party (as applicable) becomes aware that will or is reasonably likely to result in any of the conditions to the First Merger becoming incapable of being satisfied by April 7, 2026 (the “Termination Date”).
Section 16 Matters
Prior to the Effective Time, the SWK Board and the RWAY Board will take all such steps as may be required to cause any dispositions of SWK Common Stock or acquisitions of RWAY Common Stock resulting from the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement by each individual who is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act with respect to SWK or will become subject to such reporting requirements with respect to RWAY, in each case, to be exempt pursuant to Rule 16b-3.
No Other Representations or Warranties
The parties have acknowledged and agreed that except for the representations contained in the Merger Agreement, none of RWAY, SWK, the Adviser or any of SWK’s or RWAY’s respective consolidated subsidiaries or any other person or entity acting on behalf of the foregoing makes or has relied on any representation or warranty, express or implied.
NASDAQ Listing
RWAY is required to use reasonable best efforts to cause the shares comprising the Per Share Merger Consideration to be approved for listing on NASDAQ, subject to official notice of issuance, at or prior to the Effective Time.
Lease Termination
SWK will use its reasonable best efforts to seek to terminate, assign or enter into subleases on reasonable terms with respect to SWK’s real property lease, and any obligations thereunder as of or prior to the Closing. For the avoidance of doubt, all costs, expenses and liabilities related to such lease as of the Closing, including the termination of the same and any obligations thereunder, shall be borne solely by RWAY so long as such expenses and terms are reasonably acceptable to RWAY.
Conditions to Closing the Mergers
Conditions to Each Party’s Obligations to Effect the Mergers
The obligations of RWAY and SWK to effect the Mergers are subject to the satisfaction or waiver (to the extent permitted by law), at or prior to the Effective Time, of the following conditions:
119
Table of Contents
Conditions to Obligations of RWAY, Intermediary Sub and Acquisition Sub to Effect the Mergers
The obligations of RWAY, Intermediary Sub and Acquisition Sub to effect the Mergers are also subject to the satisfaction, or waiver (to the extent permitted by law) by RWAY, at or prior to the Effective Time, of the following conditions:
Conditions to Obligations of SWK to Effect the Mergers
The obligation of SWK to effect the Mergers are also subject to the satisfaction, or waiver by SWK, at or prior to the Effective Time, of the following conditions:
120
Table of Contents
Frustration of Closing Conditions
None of RWAY, Intermediary Sub, Acquisition Sub or RWAY may rely on the failure of any condition to be satisfied to excuse performance by such party of its obligations under the Merger Agreement if such failure was caused by such party’s failure to act in good faith or use its commercially reasonable efforts to consummate the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
Termination of the Merger Agreement
Right to Terminate
The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after approval of the Merger Proposal by SWK Stockholders:
121
Table of Contents
Termination Fee
The Merger Agreement provides for the payment by SWK to RWAY of a termination fee of $8,225,000 (the “Termination Fee”) if the Merger Agreement is terminated by:
Effect of Termination
If the Merger Agreement is terminated, it will become void and have no effect, and there will be no liability on the part of the Adviser, SWK, RWAY, Intermediary Sub, Acquisition Sub or their respective affiliates or consolidated subsidiaries or any of their respective directors or officers, provided, however, except as otherwise provided in the Merger Agreement, (i) the Adviser, SWK and RWAY will remain liable to each other for any damages incurred or suffered by another party arising out of its willful or intentional breach of any provision of the Merger Agreement prior to the termination of the Merger Agreement or fraud and (ii) certain designated provisions of the Merger Agreement will survive the termination of the Merger Agreement.
Amendment of the Merger Agreement
The Merger Agreement may be amended by the parties, by written agreement executed and delivered by the duly authorized officers of each of the respective parties; provided that after any approval of the Merger Proposal by SWK Stockholders, there may not be, without further approval of such stockholders, any amendment of the Merger Agreement that requires such further approval under applicable law.
122
Table of Contents
Expenses
Except as otherwise outlined in the section entitled “Description of the Merger Agreement – Termination of Merger Agreement – Termination Fees,” all expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Mergers), will be paid by the party incurring such expenses, whether or not the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (including the Mergers) are consummated. Notwithstanding the foregoing, RWAY will bear certain fees and expenses, including relating to (i) the termination of SWK’s real property leases, (ii) the calling of the SWK Notes, (iii) the preparation, filing and printing of this registration statement and proxy statement/prospectus, (iv) the preparation and filing of any required applications, notices or other filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”) and (v) any severance amounts or other costs or expenses incurred by SWK in connection with the termination of any employee or service provider of SWK or any of its subsidiaries who was employed by or provided services to SWK as of the date of the Merger Agreement and who is terminated following the date of the Merger Agreement; provided that, for purposes of the calculation of such costs, the 2025 annual bonus owed to any such employee will not be considered to be a liability associated with the termination of such employee. Additionally, SWK will bear fees and expenses relating to (i) the procurement of a “tail” insurance policy for the extension of the directors’ and officers’ liability coverage of SWK’s existing directors’ and officers’ insurance policies, as required pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, (ii) the engagement of a valuation firm for the purposes of providing good faith determination of a valuation range with respect to each of SWK’s portfolio assets and (iii) the arranging, announcing and holding of the SWK Special Meeting, including the costs of printing and mailing of SWK’s DEFM-14A to SWK Stockholders in preparation for the SWK Special Meeting and the retention of a proxy solicitor.
123
Table of Contents
DESCRIPTION OF KEY STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT
Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, RWAY entered into a key stockholder agreement (the “Key Stockholder Agreement”) with Double Black Diamond Offshore, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company, (the “Key Stockholder”) and, solely for the purposes of Section 4 thereto, Black Diamond Offshore Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company. The Key Stockholder Agreement, among other things:
As of the SWK Record Date, the Key Stockholder is entitled to vote approximately 8,493,088 shares of SWK Common Stock, or approximately 70.21% of the outstanding shares of SWK Common Stock. The foregoing is a summary of the material terms of the Key Stockholder Agreement. The summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Key Stockholder Agreement, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Prior to entry into the Key Stockholder Agreement, the SWK Board adopted resolutions approving the Merger Agreement confirming that the restrictions on business combinations contained in Section 203 will not apply to the Mergers.
124
Table of Contents
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF THE MERGER
Management has determined that the Mergers will be accounted for as an asset acquisition in accordance with ASC 805-50, Business Combinations-Related Issues, with RWAY as the accounting survivor. Under asset acquisition accounting, acquiring assets in groups not only requires ascertaining the cost of the assets (or net assets), but also allocating that cost to the individual assets (or individual assets and liabilities) that make up the group. Per ASC 805-50-30-1, assets are recognized based on their cost to the acquiring entity, which generally includes transaction costs of the asset acquisition, and no gain or loss is recognized unless the fair value of noncash assets given as consideration differs from the net assets acquired. If the consideration given is not in the form of cash (that is, in the form of noncash assets, liabilities incurred, or equity interests issued), measurement is based on either the fair value of the consideration given or the fair value of the assets (or net assets) acquired, whichever is more clearly evident and, thus, more reliably measurable.
In connection with the Mergers, the outstanding shares of SWK Common Stock will be exchanged for a combination of newly issued shares of RWAY Common Stock and cash consideration.
The consideration paid (i.e. cost) of the group of assets acquired in an asset acquisition is allocated to the individual assets acquired or liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values of net identifiable assets acquired other than “non-qualifying” assets (for example cash) and does not give rise to goodwill. To the extent that the consideration paid to SWK Stockholders does not approximate the relative fair values of the net identifiable assets acquired, other than “non-qualifying” assets, any such premium (or discount) paid by RWAY will be further allocated to the cost of the SWK assets acquired by RWAY pro-rata to their relative fair value, other than “non-qualifying” assets. Immediately following the closing of the Mergers, RWAY, as the accounting survivor, is required to present its assets at their respective fair values and, as a result, the purchase premium (or discount) is allocated to the cost basis of the SWK assets acquired and will be immediately recognized as unrealized gain (or loss) on the consolidated financial statements of RWAY. The component of this amount which is allocated to the acquired loan investments will be accreted over the remaining maturities as a reduction (or increase) to interest income. Additionally, the component of this amount which is allocated to the acquired equity and royalty securities will be recognized as a realized gain (or loss) upon termination or disposal of such instruments.
The final allocation of the purchase price will be determined after the Mergers is completed and after completion of a final analysis to determine the estimated relative fair values of SWK’s investment portfolio and its net asset value. Increases or decreases in the estimated fair values of the net assets, commitments, and other items of SWK as compared to the information shown in this proxy statement/prospectus may change the amount of the purchase price recognized as income in accordance with ASC 805-10. Accordingly, the final adjustments may be materially different from the pro forma adjustments presented in this proxy statement/prospectus.
125
Table of Contents
CERTAIN MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion is a general summary of U.S. federal income tax considerations generally applicable to the Mergers and an investment in shares of RWAY Common Stock by a shareholder of SWK. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of the income tax considerations of the Mergers or applicable to an investment in shares of RWAY Common Stock. No attempt is made to present a detailed explanation of all U.S. federal income tax aspects affecting RWAY, SWK, or their stockholders. No ruling has been or will be sought from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) regarding any matter discussed herein. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax aspects set forth below.
The discussion set forth herein does not constitute tax advice and stockholders are urged to consult their tax advisers to determine the specific U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax considerations to them of the Mergers and an investment in RWAY Common Stock in light of their particular circumstances.
For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. stockholder” or “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of SWK Common Stock or RWAY Common Stock who for U.S. federal income tax purposes is:
For purposes of this discussion, a “non-U.S. stockholder” or “non-U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of SWK Common Stock or RWAY Common Stock that is neither a U.S. stockholder nor a partnership (including an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes).
If a partnership (including for this purpose any entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds SWK Common Stock or RWAY Common Stock, the tax treatment of a partner generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding SWK Common Stock or RWAY Common Stock, you should consult your tax advisor.
This discussion addresses only those SWK Stockholders and RWAY Stockholders that hold their SWK Common Stock or RWAY Common Stock as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code, and does not address all the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to particular SWK Stockholders or RWAY Stockholders in light of their individual circumstances or to SWK Stockholders or RWAY Stockholders that are subject to special rules, such as:
126
Table of Contents
In addition, the discussion does not address any alternative minimum tax, gift or estate tax, or any state, local or foreign tax consequences of the Mergers, nor does it address any tax consequences arising under the Medicare tax on NII.
The following discussion is based on the Code, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations thereunder and published rulings and decisions, all as currently in effect as of the date hereof, and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Any such change could affect the continuing validity of this discussion.
Tax Consequences of the Mergers
Neither RWAY nor SWK will receive an opinion as to the tax consequences of the Mergers for RWAY, SWK or SWK’s stockholders. RWAY and SWK will treat the Mergers as a taxable exchange not qualifying as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and therefore generally:
127
Table of Contents
Non-U.S. Stockholders
Gain recognized by a non-U.S. stockholder upon the exchange of SWK Common Stock pursuant to the First Merger generally should not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless:
A non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to information reporting and, in certain circumstances, backup withholding with respect to the Merger Consideration received by such holder pursuant to the First Merger, unless such non-U.S. stockholder certifies under penalties of perjury that it is a non-U.S. stockholder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the holder is a United States person as defined under the Code) or such non-U.S. stockholder otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against a non-U.S. stockholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Legislation commonly referred to as the “Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act”, or “FATCA”, generally imposes a 30% withholding tax on payments of certain types of income to foreign financial institutions (or “FFIs”) unless such FFIs either: (i) enter into an agreement with the U.S. Treasury to report certain required information with respect to accounts held by U.S. persons (or held by foreign entities that have U.S. persons as substantial owners) or (ii) reside in a jurisdiction that has entered into an intergovernmental agreement (as “IGA”) with the United States to collect and share such information and are in compliance with the terms of such IGA and any enabling legislation or regulations. The types of income subject to the tax include U.S. source interest and dividends. Proposed U.S. Treasury Regulations (upon which taxpayers may rely until final regulations are issued) eliminate FATCA withholding on gross proceeds entirely. The information required to be reported includes the identity and taxpayer identification number of each account holder that is a U.S. person and transaction activity within the holder’s account. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, FATCA also imposes a 30% withholding on payments to foreign entities that are not FFIs unless such foreign entities certify that they do not have a greater than 10% U.S. owner or provide the withholding agent with identifying information on each greater than 10% U.S. owner. Non-U.S. stockholders should consult their tax advisors regarding the potential application of FATCA withholding on amounts received by such holders in connection with the Mergers.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation of an Investment in RWAY Common Stock
The following discussion is a general summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to RWAY, to RWAY’s qualification and taxation as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Subchapter M of the Code and to an investment in RWAY Common Stock.
Election to be Taxed as a RIC
RWAY has elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, RWAY generally will not have to pay corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on any income that RWAY distributes to RWAY Stockholders from its taxable earnings and profits. To qualify as a RIC, RWAY must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In addition, in order to maintain RIC tax treatment, RWAY must distribute to RWAY Stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of its “investment company taxable income,” which is generally its net ordinary income plus the excess, if any, of realized net short-term capital gain over realized net long-term capital loss (the “Annual Distribution Requirement”). Even if RWAY qualifies
128
Table of Contents
as a RIC, RWAY generally will be subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax on its undistributed taxable income and could be subject to U.S. federal excise, state, local and foreign taxes.
129
Table of Contents
Taxation as a RIC
Provided that RWAY qualifies as a RIC and satisfies the Annual Distribution Requirement, RWAY will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the portion of its investment company taxable income and net capital gain (which generally is defined as net long-term capital gain in excess of net short-term capital loss) that it timely distributes to stockholders. RWAY will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates on any income or capital gain not distributed (or deemed distributed) to RWAY Stockholders.
RWAY will be subject to a 4% nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax on certain undistributed income of RICs unless it distributes in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of its ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.2% of its capital gain net income for the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income recognized, but not distributed, in preceding years and on which RWAY paid no U.S. federal income tax. RWAY will generally review the benefits of avoiding excise tax against the costs of paying such tax.
In order to be treated as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, RWAY must, among other things:
To the extent that RWAY invests in entities treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes (other than a “qualified publicly traded partnership”), RWAY generally must include the items of gross income derived by the partnerships for purposes of the 90% Income Test, and the income that is derived from a partnership (other than a “qualified publicly traded partnership”) will be treated as qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income Test only to the extent that such income is attributable to items of income of the partnership which would be qualifying income if realized by RWAY directly. In addition, RWAY generally must take into account its proportionate share of the assets held by partnerships (other than a “qualified publicly traded partnership”) in which RWAY is a partner for purposes of the Diversification Tests.
In determining whether or not a RIC is in compliance with the Diversification Tests, the 90% Income Test and the Annual Distribution Requirement, a RIC may take into consideration certain cure provisions contained in the Code.
In order to meet the 90% Income Test, RWAY may establish one or more special purpose corporations to hold assets from which RWAY does not anticipate earning dividend, interest or other qualifying income under the 90% Income Test. Any investments held through such a special purpose corporation would generally be subject to U.S. federal income and other taxes, and therefore RWAY can expect to achieve a reduced after-tax yield on such investments.
RWAY may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances in which RWAY does not receive a corresponding payment in cash. For example, if RWAY holds debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with payment-in-kind interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or issued with warrants), RWAY must include in income each year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by RWAY in the same taxable year. RWAY may also have to include in income other amounts
130
Table of Contents
that RWAY has not yet received in cash, such as deferred loan origination fees that are paid after origination of the loan or are paid in non-cash compensation such as warrants or stock. RWAY anticipates that a portion of RWAY’s income may constitute original issue discount or other income required to be included in taxable income prior to receipt of cash.
Because any original issue discount or other amounts accrued will be included in RWAY’s investment company taxable income for the year of the accrual, RWAY may be required to make a distribution to RWAY Stockholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even though RWAY will not have received any corresponding cash amount. As a result, RWAY may have difficulty meeting the Annual Distribution Requirement necessary to maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code. RWAY may have to sell some of its investments at times and/or at prices RWAY would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If RWAY is not able to obtain cash from other sources, RWAY may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax.
Furthermore, a portfolio company in which RWAY invests may face financial difficulty that requires RWAY to work-out, modify or otherwise restructure its investment in the portfolio company. Any such restructuring may result in unusable capital losses and future non-cash income. Any restructuring may also result in RWAY’s recognition of a substantial amount of non-qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income Test, such as cancellation of indebtedness income in connection with the work-out of a leveraged investment (which, while not free from doubt, may be treated as non-qualifying income) or the receipt of other non-qualifying income.
Gain or loss realized by RWAY from warrants acquired by RWAY as well as any loss attributable to the lapse of such warrants generally will be treated as capital gain or loss. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term or short-term, depending on how long RWAY held a particular warrant.
RWAY’s investment in non-U.S. securities may be subject to non-U.S. income, withholding and other taxes. In that case, RWAY’s yield on those securities would be decreased. Stockholders will generally not be entitled to claim a credit or deduction with respect to non-U.S. taxes paid by RWAY.
If RWAY acquires investments in “passive foreign investment companies” (“PFICs”) (including equity tranche investments in CLO vehicles that are PFICs), RWAY may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a portion of any “excess distribution” or gain from the disposition of such investments even if such income is distributed as a taxable dividend by RWAY to RWAY Stockholders. Certain elections may be available to mitigate or eliminate such tax on excess distributions, but such elections (if available) will generally require RWAY to recognize its share of the PFIC’s income for each year regardless of whether RWAY receives any distributions from such PFIC. RWAY must nonetheless distribute such income to maintain its status as a RIC.
If RWAY holds more than 10% of the shares in a foreign corporation that is treated as a controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) (including equity tranche investments in a CLO vehicle treated as a CFC), RWAY may be treated as receiving a deemed distribution (taxable as ordinary income) each year from such foreign corporation in an amount equal to RWAY’s pro rata share of the corporation’s income for the tax year (including both ordinary earnings and capital gains). If RWAY is required to include such deemed distributions from a CFC in its income, RWAY will be required to distribute such income to maintain its RIC status regardless of whether or not the CFC makes an actual distribution during such year.
If RWAY is required to include amounts in income prior to receiving distributions representing such income, RWAY may have to sell some of its investments at times and/or at prices RWAY would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If RWAY is not able to obtain cash from other sources, RWAY may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax.
In addition, as discussed above, to qualify as a RIC, RWAY must, among other thing, satisfy the 90% Income Test. Although the Code generally provides that the income inclusions from a PFIC for which RWAY has made a qualifying fund election (such a PFIC, a “QEF”) or a CFC will be “good income” for purposes of this 90% Income Test to the extent that the QEF or the CFC distributes such income to RWAY in the same taxable year in which the income is included in RWAY’s income, the Code does not specifically provide whether these income inclusions would be “good income” for this 90% Income Test if RWAY does not receive distributions from the QEF or CFC during such taxable year. The IRS has issued a series of private rulings in which it has concluded that all income inclusions from a QEF or a CFC included in a RIC’s gross income would constitute “good income” for purposes of the 90% Income Test. Such rulings are not binding on the IRS except with respect to the taxpayers to whom such rulings were issued. The IRS and U.S. Treasury Department have issued regulations that provide that the income inclusions from a QEF or a CFC will be good income for purposes of the 90% Income Test if RWAY receives a cash distribution from such entity in the same year attributable to the included income or the included income is derived with respect to RWAY’s business of investing in stocks and securities. Accordingly, under current law, RWAY believes that the income inclusions from a CLO that is a QEF or a CFC would be “good income” for purposes of the 90% Income Test whether or not such income is distributed by the QEF or CFC during the taxable year.
131
Table of Contents
Under Section 988 of the Code, gain or loss attributable to fluctuations in exchange rates between the time RWAY accrues income, expenses, or other liabilities denominated in a foreign currency and the time RWAY actually collects such income or pays such expenses or liabilities are generally treated as ordinary income or loss. Similarly, gain or loss on foreign currency forward contracts and the disposition of debt denominated in a foreign currency, to the extent attributable to fluctuations in exchange rates between the acquisition and disposition dates, are also treated as ordinary income or loss.
Although RWAY does not presently expect to do so, RWAY is authorized to borrow funds and to sell assets in order to satisfy its distribution requirements. However, under the 1940 Act, RWAY is not permitted to make distributions to RWAY Stockholders while certain of its debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding unless certain “asset coverage” tests are met. See “Business — Regulation — Qualifying Assets” in Part I, Item 1 of RWAY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and the section entitled “Indebtedness; Coverage Ratio.” Moreover, RWAY’s ability to dispose of assets to meet its distribution requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of RWAY’s portfolio and/or (2) other requirements relating to RWAY’s status as a RIC, including the Diversification Tests. If RWAY disposes of assets in order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or to avoid the excise tax, RWAY may make such dispositions at times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous.
If RWAY fails to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement or otherwise fails to qualify as a RIC in any taxable year, RWAY will be subject to tax in that year on all of its taxable income, regardless of whether RWAY makes any distributions to RWAY Stockholders. In that case, all of such income will be subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax, reducing the amount available to be distributed to RWAY Stockholders. See the section entitled “— Failure To Qualify as a RIC” below. Except as otherwise indicated, this discussion assumes that RWAY will qualify for taxation as a RIC for all relevant years.
As a RIC, RWAY is not allowed to carry forward or carry back a net operating loss for purposes of computing its investment company taxable income in other taxable years. U.S. federal income tax law generally permits a RIC to carry forward (i) the excess of its net short-term capital loss over its net long-term capital gain for a given year as a short-term capital loss arising on the first day of the following year and (ii) the excess of its net long-term capital loss over its net short-term capital gain for a given year as a long-term capital loss arising on the first day of the following year. However, future transactions RWAY engages in may cause its ability to use any capital loss carryforwards, and unrealized losses once realized, to be limited under Section 382 of the Code. Certain of RWAY’s investment practices may be subject to special and complex U.S. federal income tax provisions that may, among other things, (i) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the allowance of certain losses or deductions, (ii) convert lower taxed long-term capital gain and qualified dividend income into higher taxed short-term capital gain or ordinary income, (iii) convert an ordinary loss or a deduction into a capital loss (the deductibility of which is more limited), (iv) cause RWAY to recognize income or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash, (v) adversely affect the time as to when a purchase or sale of stock or securities is deemed to occur, (vi) adversely alter the characterization of certain complex financial transactions and (vii) produce income that will not be qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income Test. RWAY will monitor its transactions and may make certain tax elections in order to mitigate the effect of these provisions.
As described above, to the extent that RWAY invests in equity securities of entities that are treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the effect of such investments for purposes of the 90% Income Test and the Diversification Tests will depend on whether or not the partnership is a “qualified publicly traded partnership” (as defined in the Code). If the partnership is a “qualified publicly traded partnership,” the net income derived from such investments will be qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income Test and will be “securities” for purposes of the Diversification Tests. If the partnership, however, is not treated as a “qualified publicly traded partnership,” the consequences of an investment in the partnership will depend upon the amount and type of income of the partnership allocable to RWAY and its proportionate share of the underlying assets of the partnership. The income derived from such investments may not be qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income Test and, therefore, could adversely affect RWAY’s qualification as a RIC. RWAY intends to monitor its investments in equity securities of entities that are treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes to prevent RWAY’s disqualification as a RIC.
RWAY may invest in preferred securities or other securities the U.S. federal income tax treatment of which may not be clear or may be subject to recharacterization by the IRS. To the extent the tax treatment of such securities or the income from such securities differs from the expected tax treatment, it could affect the timing or character of income recognized, requiring RWAY to purchase or sell securities, or otherwise change its portfolio, in order to comply with the tax rules applicable to RICs under the Code.
Failure to Qualify as a RIC
If RWAY were unable to maintain tax treatment as a RIC, RWAY would be subject to tax on all of its taxable income at regular corporate rates. RWAY would not be able to deduct distributions to stockholders, nor would they be required to be made. Distributions would generally be taxable to RWAY Stockholders as dividend income to the extent of RWAY’s current and accumulated earnings and profits (in the case of noncorporate U.S. stockholders, at a maximum rate applicable to qualified dividend income of 20%, provided certain
132
Table of Contents
holding period and other requirements are met). Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate stockholders would be eligible for the dividends-received deduction.
Distributions in excess of RWAY’s current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain.
If RWAY fails to meet the RIC requirements for more than two consecutive years and then seeks to re-qualify as a RIC, RWAY would be required to recognize gain to the extent of any unrealized appreciation in its assets unless RWAY made a special election to pay corporate-level U.S. federal income tax on any such unrealized appreciation during the succeeding five-year period. Except as otherwise indicated, this discussion assumes that RWAY will qualify for taxation as a RIC for all relevant years.
Taxation of U.S. Stockholders
Whether an investment in shares of RWAY Common Stock is appropriate for a U.S. stockholder will depend upon that person’s particular circumstances. An investment in shares of RWAY Common Stock by a U.S. stockholder may have adverse tax consequences. The following summary generally describes certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in shares of RWAY Common Stock by taxable U.S. stockholders and not by U.S. stockholders that are generally exempt from U.S. federal income taxation. U.S. stockholders should consult their tax advisors before making an investment in RWAY Common Stock.
Distributions by RWAY generally are taxable to U.S. stockholders as ordinary income or capital gain. Distributions of RWAY’s “investment company taxable income” (which is, generally, RWAY’s ordinary income excluding net capital gain) will be taxable as ordinary income to U.S. stockholders to the extent of RWAY’s current or accumulated earnings and profits, whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional common stock. To the extent such distributions paid by RWAY to noncorporate U.S. stockholders (including individuals) are attributable to dividends from U.S. corporations and certain qualified foreign corporations, such distributions generally will be eligible for taxation at rates applicable to “qualifying dividends” (currently at a maximum tax rate of 20%) provided that RWAY properly reports such distributions as “qualified dividend income” and certain holding period and other requirements are satisfied. In this regard, it is not anticipated that a significant portion of distributions paid by RWAY will be attributable to qualifying dividends; therefore, RWAY’s distributions generally will not qualify for the preferential rates applicable to qualified dividend income. Distributions of RWAY’s net capital gain (which is generally RWAY’s net long-term capital gain in excess of net short-term capital loss) properly reported by RWAY as “capital gain dividends” will be taxable to a U.S. stockholder as long-term capital gain (currently at reduced rates in the case of individuals, trusts or estates), regardless of the U.S. stockholder’s holding period for his, her or its RWAY Common Stock and regardless of whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional RWAY Common Stock. Distributions in excess of RWAY’s current and accumulated earnings and profits first will reduce a U.S. stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in such stockholder’s RWAY Common Stock and, after the adjusted basis is reduced to zero, will constitute capital gain to such U.S. stockholder.
U.S. stockholders who receive distributions in the form of stock generally are subject to the same U.S. federal income tax consequences as are stockholders who elect to receive their distributions in cash. The U.S. stockholder will have an adjusted tax basis in the additional shares of RWAY Common Stock purchased through the plan equal to the amount of the reinvested distribution. The additional shares will have a new holding period commencing on the day following the day on which the shares are credited to the U.S. stockholder’s account.
Although RWAY currently intends to distribute any long-term capital gain at least annually, RWAY may in the future decide to retain some or all of its long-term capital gain, but designate the retained amount as a “deemed distribution.” In that case, among other consequences, RWAY will pay tax on the retained amount, each U.S. stockholder will be required to include his, her or its proportionate share of the deemed distribution in income as if it had been actually distributed to the U.S. stockholder, and the U.S. stockholder will be entitled to claim a credit equal to his, her or its allocable share of the tax paid thereon by RWAY. The amount of the deemed distribution net of such tax will be added to the U.S. stockholder’s tax basis for his, her or its common stock. Since RWAY expects to pay tax on any retained capital gain at the regular corporate tax rate, and since that rate is in excess of the maximum rate currently payable by individuals on net capital gain, the amount of tax that individual U.S. stockholders will be treated as having paid and for which they will receive a credit will exceed the tax they owe on the retained net capital gain. Such excess generally may be claimed as a credit against the U.S. stockholder’s other U.S. federal income tax obligations or may be refunded to the extent it exceeds such U.S. stockholder’s liability for U.S. federal income tax. A U.S. stockholder that is not subject to U.S. federal income tax or otherwise required to file a U.S. federal income tax return would be required to file a U.S. federal income tax return on the appropriate form in order to claim a refund for the taxes RWAY paid. In order to utilize the deemed distribution approach, RWAY must provide written notice to RWAY Stockholders prior to the expiration of 60 days after the close of the relevant taxable year. RWAY cannot treat any of its investment company taxable income as a “deemed distribution.”
133
Table of Contents
For purposes of determining (1) whether the Annual Distribution Requirement is satisfied for any year and (2) the amount of capital gain dividends paid for that year, RWAY may, under certain circumstances, elect to treat a dividend that is paid during the following taxable year as if it had been paid during the taxable year in question. If RWAY makes such an election, a U.S. stockholder will still be treated as receiving the dividend in the taxable year in which the distribution is made. However, any dividend declared by RWAY in October, November or December of any calendar year, payable to U.S. stockholders of record on a specified date in any such month and actually paid during January of the following year, will be treated as if it had been received by RWAY’s U.S. stockholders on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared.
RWAY may have the ability to declare a large portion of a distribution in shares of RWAY Common Stock to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement. If a portion of such distribution is paid in cash (which portion may generally be as low as 20% based on certain guidance issued by the IRS) and certain requirements are met, the entire distribution to the extent of RWAY’s current or accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, U.S. stockholders will be taxed on the distribution as if the entire distribution was a cash distribution, even though most of the distribution was paid in shares of RWAY Common Stock.
A U.S. stockholder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss if the U.S. stockholder sells or otherwise disposes of his, her or its shares of RWAY Common Stock. The amount of gain or loss will be measured by the difference between such U.S. stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in the RWAY Common Stock sold and the amount of the proceeds received in exchange. Any gain arising from such sale or disposition generally will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. stockholder has held his, her or its shares for more than one year. Otherwise, it will be classified as short-term capital gain or loss. However, any capital loss arising from the sale or disposition of shares of RWAY Common Stock held for six months or less will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of the amount of capital gain dividends received, or undistributed capital gain deemed received, with respect to such shares. In addition, all or a portion of any loss recognized upon a disposition of shares of RWAY Common Stock may be disallowed if other substantially identical shares are purchased (whether through reinvestment of distributions or otherwise) within 30 days before or after the disposition. The ability to otherwise deduct capital loss may be subject to other limitations under the Code.
In general, U.S. stockholders taxed at individual rates currently are subject to reduced U.S. federal income tax rates on their recognized net capital gain (i.e., the excess of realized net long-term capital gains over realized net short-term capital losses), including any long-term capital gain derived from an investment in RWAY Common Stock. Such rate is lower than the maximum rate on ordinary income currently payable by such U.S. stockholders. Corporate U.S. stockholders currently are subject to U.S. federal income tax on net capital gain at the 21% rate also applied to ordinary income.
Noncorporate U.S. stockholders with net capital loss for a year (capital loss in excess of capital gain) generally may deduct up to $3,000 of such losses against their ordinary income each year; any net capital loss of a noncorporate stockholder in excess of $3,000 generally may be carried forward and used in subsequent years as provided in the Code. Corporate stockholders generally may not deduct any net capital loss for a year, but may carry back such losses for three years or carry forward such losses for five years.
If RWAY ceases to be a publicly offered regulated investment company, a noncorporate U.S. stockholder’s pro rata portion of RWAY’s affected expenses, including RWAY’s management fees, will be treated as an additional dividend to the stockholder and will be deductible by such stockholder only to the extent permitted under the limitations described below. A “publicly offered regulated investment company” is a regulated investment company whose shares are either (i) continuously offered pursuant to a public offering, (ii) regularly traded on an established securities market or (iii) held by at least 500 persons at all times during the taxable year. For taxable years beginning before 2026, certain expenses (including advisory fees), referred to as miscellaneous itemized deductions generally are not deductible by noncorporate U.S. stockholders, including individuals, trusts, and estates. For taxable years beginning in 2026 or later, miscellaneous itemized deductions generally are deductible by a noncorporate U.S. stockholder (such as an individual, trust or estate) only to the extent that the aggregate of such U.S. stockholder’s miscellaneous itemized deductions exceeds 2% of such U.S. stockholder’s adjusted gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, are not deductible for purposes of the alternative minimum tax and are subject to the overall limitation on itemized deductions under Section 68 of the Code. RWAY anticipates that it will initially constitute a publicly offered regulated investment company although it is possible that it may not qualify at some point in the future.
RWAY (or the applicable withholding agent) will send to each of its U.S. stockholders, as promptly as possible after the end of each calendar year, a notice reporting the amounts includible in such U.S. stockholder’s taxable income for such year as ordinary income and as long-term capital gain. In addition, the U.S. federal income tax status of each year’s distributions generally will be reported to the IRS. Dividends paid by RWAY generally will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction or the preferential tax rate applicable to qualifying dividends. Distributions and gains on sale may also be subject to additional state, local and foreign taxes depending on a U.S. stockholder’s particular situation.
134
Table of Contents
RWAY (or the applicable withholding agent) may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax, or backup withholding, from all distributions to any noncorporate U.S. stockholder (1) who fails to furnish RWAY with a correct taxpayer identification number or a certificate that such U.S. stockholder is exempt from backup withholding or (2) with respect to whom the IRS notifies RWAY that such stockholder has failed to properly report certain interest and dividend income to the IRS and to respond to notices to that effect. An individual’s taxpayer identification number is his or her social security number. Backup withholding tax is not an additional tax, and any amount withheld may be refunded or credited against the U.S. stockholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that proper information is timely provided to the IRS.
Under U.S. Treasury Regulations, if a U.S. stockholder recognizes a loss with respect to shares of RWAY Common Stock of $2 million or more for a noncorporate U.S. stockholder or $10 million or more for a corporate U.S. stockholder in any single taxable year (or a greater loss over a combination of years), the U.S. stockholder must file with the IRS a disclosure statement on IRS Form 8886 (or successor form). Direct stockholders of portfolio securities in many cases are excepted from this reporting requirement, but under current guidance, stockholders of a RIC are not excepted. Future guidance may extend the current exception from this reporting requirement to stockholders of most or all RICs. The fact that a loss is reportable under these regulations does not affect the legal determination of whether the taxpayer’s treatment of the loss is proper. Significant monetary penalties apply to a failure to comply with this reporting requirement. States may also have a similar reporting requirement. Stockholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the applicability of these regulations in light of their individual circumstances.
Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders
Whether an investment in the shares is appropriate for a non-U.S. stockholder will depend upon that person’s particular circumstances. An investment in the shares by a non-U.S. stockholder may have adverse tax consequences. Non-U.S. stockholders should consult their tax advisers before investing in RWAY Common Stock. Distributions of RWAY’s “investment company taxable income” (which excludes net capital gain) to non-U.S. stockholders that are not “effectively connected” with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the non-U.S. stockholder will generally be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30% (or lower rate provided by an applicable treaty) to the extent of RWAY’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, unless an applicable exception applies. However, RWAY generally is not required to withhold any amounts with respect to distributions of (i) U.S.-source interest income that would not have been subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax if they had been earned directly by a non-U.S. stockholder, and (ii) net short-term capital gains in excess of net long-term capital losses that would not have been subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax if they had been earned directly by a non-U.S. stockholder, in each case only to the extent that such distributions are properly reported by RWAY as “interest-related dividends” or “short-term capital gain dividends,” as the case may be, and certain other requirements are met. No certainty can be provided that any of RWAY’s distributions will be reported as eligible for this exception.
Actual or deemed distributions of RWAY’s net capital gain to a non-U.S. stockholder, and gains realized by a non-U.S. stockholder upon the sale of RWAY Common Stock, that are not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the non-U.S. stockholder, will generally not be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax and generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless the non-U.S. stockholder is a nonresident alien individual and is physically present in the United States for more than 182 days during the taxable year and meets certain other requirements. However, withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30% on capital gain of nonresident alien individuals who are physically present in the United States for more than the 182 day period only applies in exceptional cases because any individual present in the United States for more than 182 days during the taxable year is generally treated as a U.S. resident for U.S. income tax purposes; in that case, he or she would be subject to U.S. income tax on his or her worldwide income at the graduated rates applicable to U.S. citizens, rather than the 30% U.S. federal withholding tax.
If RWAY distributes its net capital gain in the form of deemed rather than actual distributions (which RWAY may do in the future), a non-U.S. stockholder will be entitled to a U.S. federal income tax credit or tax refund equal to the non-U.S. stockholder’s allocable share of the tax RWAY pays on the capital gain deemed to have been distributed. In order to obtain the refund, the non-U.S. stockholder must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file a U.S. federal income tax return even if the non-U.S. stockholder would not otherwise be required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number or file a U.S. federal income tax return. Accordingly, investment in RWAY Common Stock may not be appropriate for a non-U.S. stockholder.
Distributions of RWAY’s “investment company taxable income” and net capital gain (including deemed distributions) to non-U.S. stockholders, and gains realized by non-U.S. stockholders upon the sale of RWAY Common Stock that are “effectively connected” with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the non-U.S. stockholder (or if an income tax treaty applies, attributable to a “permanent establishment” in the United States), will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the graduated rates applicable to U.S. citizens, residents and domestic corporations. Corporate non-U.S. stockholders may also be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30% imposed by the Code (or lower rate provided by an applicable treaty). In the case of a noncorporate non-U.S. stockholder, RWAY may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax from distributions that are otherwise exempt from withholding tax (or taxable at a reduced rate) unless the non-U.S. stockholder certifies his or her foreign status under penalties of perjury or otherwise establishes an exemption.
135
Table of Contents
RWAY may have the ability to declare a large portion of a distribution in shares of RWAY Common Stock to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement. If a portion of such dividend is paid in cash (which portion may be as low as 20% under certain guidance issued by the IRS) and certain requirements are met, the entire distribution to the extent of RWAY’s current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, non-U.S. stockholders will be taxed on the distribution as if the entire distribution was cash distribution, even though most of the distribution was paid in shares of RWAY Common Stock.
The tax consequences to a non-U.S. stockholder entitled to claim the benefits of an applicable tax treaty may differ from those described herein. Non-U.S. stockholders are advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect to the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in RWAY Common Stock.
A non-U.S. stockholder who is a nonresident alien individual or foreign corporation may be subject to information reporting and withholding of U.S. federal income tax on dividends unless the non-U.S. stockholder provides RWAY or the dividend paying agent with an IRS Form W-8BEN or IRS Form W-8BEN-E (or an acceptable substitute form) or otherwise meets documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it is a non-U.S. stockholder or otherwise establishes an exemption from withholding.
FATCA generally imposes a 30% withholding tax on payments of certain types of income to FFIs unless such FFIs either (i) enter into an agreement with the U.S. Treasury to report certain required information with respect to accounts held by U.S. persons (or held by foreign entities that have U.S. persons as substantial owners) or (ii) reside in a jurisdiction that has entered into an IGA with the United States to collect and share such information and are in compliance with the terms of such IGA and any enabling legislation or regulations. The types of income subject to the withholding tax include U.S.-source interest and dividends. While withholding under FATCA would also have applied to payments of gross proceeds from the sale or other taxable disposition of RWAY Common Stock, proposed U.S. Treasury Regulations (upon which taxpayers may rely until final regulations are issued) eliminate FATCA withholding on gross proceeds entirely. The information required to be reported includes the identity and taxpayer identification number of each account holder that is a U.S. person and transaction activity within the holder’s account. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, this legislation also imposes a 30% withholding on payments to foreign entities that are not FFIs unless the foreign entity certifies that it does not have a greater than 10% U.S. owner or provides the withholding agent with identifying information on each greater than 10% U.S. owner. Depending on the status of a non-U.S. stockholder and the status of the intermediaries through which they hold their shares, non-U.S. stockholders could be subject to this 30% withholding tax with respect to distributions on their shares. Under certain circumstances, a non-U.S. stockholder might be eligible for refunds or credits of such taxes.
Non-U.S. persons should consult their tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal income tax and withholding tax, and state, local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in RWAY Common Stock.
136
Table of Contents
SWK PROPOSAL 1 — APPROVAL OF THE MERGER PROPOSAL
General
SWK is asking SWK Stockholders to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the First Merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement. At the Effective Time, and subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, each share of SWK Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than shares owned by RWAY or any of its consolidated subsidiaries, including Intermediary Sub and Acquisition Sub) will be converted into the right to receive, in accordance with the Merger Agreement and at the election of the respective SWK Stockholder, either the (i) Per Share Stock Consideration or (ii) Per Share Cash Consideration, as described in the section entitled “Description of the Merger Agreement – Merger Consideration.” In addition to the Per Share Merger Consideration, SWK Stockholders will be entitled to receive the Per Share Guaranteed Cash Payment.
Approval of the Merger Proposal is required for the completion of the Mergers.
Appraisal Rights
Subject to the closing of the First Merger, SWK Stockholders who do not vote in favor of the Merger Proposal and otherwise comply with the procedures and satisfy the conditions set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL are entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL. Failure to follow exactly the procedures specified under Section 262 of the DGCL will result in the loss of appraisal rights. See the section entitled “The Mergers — Appraisal Rights” of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Required Vote
SWK Stockholders may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST,” or they may “ABSTAIN” from voting on, the Merger Proposal. The affirmative vote of SWK Stockholders representing a majority of outstanding shares of SWK Common Stock entitled to vote at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Merger Proposal.
Abstentions will have the same effect as votes “AGAINST” the Merger Proposal. Proxies received will be voted “FOR” the approval of the Merger Proposal unless SWK Stockholders designate otherwise.
After careful consideration, the SWK Board unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and determined the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (other than the Second Merger and the Third Merger) are advisable and unanimously recommends that SWK Stockholders vote “FOR” the Merger Proposal.
137
Table of Contents
SWK PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION PROPOSAL
General
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-21(c) thereunder, SWK is asking SWK Stockholders to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to SWK’s named executive officers in connection with the Merger, as described in the section entitled “The Mergers - Interests of the Directors and Executive Officers of SWK in the Mergers” and quantified pursuant to Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K (the “Compensation Proposal”).
This proposal gives SWK Stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the merger-related compensation arrangements for SWK’s named executive officers. Approval of this advisory vote is not required for completion of the Mergers. The vote on this proposal is advisory only and will not be binding on SWK, RWAY, or the Combined Company following the Mergers. Because the Merger is expected to be completed regardless of the outcome of this advisory vote, the compensation arrangements described in this proxy statement/prospectus will remain in effect even if SWK Stockholders do not approve this proposal.
For more information regarding these compensation arrangements, see the section entitled “The Mergers - Interests of the Directors and Executive Officers of SWK in the Mergers” of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Required Vote
SWK Stockholders may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST,” or they may “ABSTAIN” from voting on, the Compensation Proposal. The affirmative vote of SWK Stockholders representing a majority of all the votes properly cast at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Compensation Proposal. Abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.
After careful consideration, the SWK Board unanimously recommends that SWK Stockholders vote “FOR” the Compensation Proposal, on a non-binding advisory basis.
138
Table of Contents
SWK PROPOSAL 3 — APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROPOSAL
General
SWK is asking SWK Stockholders to approve the compensation that may be paid or become payable to each member of the SWK Board to recognize the contributions, time and commitment provided by the SWK Board in connection with the Mergers, as described below (the “Director Compensation Proposal”):
This proposal gives SWK Stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the merger-related compensation arrangements for members of the SWK Board as recognition for the contributions, time and commitment of its members in connection with the Merger. If approved by the SWK Stockholders, the Director Payments shall be paid in cash prior to 5:00 p.m. New York City Time on the Determination Date and such aggregate amount of Director Payments shall be reflected as a reduction to the Closing SWK Net Asset Value.
Approval of Director Compensation Proposal is not required for completion of the Mergers.
Required Vote
SWK Stockholders may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST,” or they may “ABSTAIN” from voting on, the Director Compensation Proposal. The affirmative vote of SWK Stockholders representing a majority of all the votes properly cast at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Director Compensation Proposal. Abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.
After careful consideration, the SWK Board unanimously recommends that SWK Stockholders vote “FOR” the Director Compensation Proposal.
139
Table of Contents
SWK PROPOSAL 4 — APPROVAL OF THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL
General
SWK is asking SWK Stockholders to approve one or more adjournments of the SWK Special Meeting if necessary to solicit additional proxies in favor of the Merger Proposal if there are insufficient votes at the time of the SWK Special Meeting to approve the Merger Proposal.
SWK's right to adjourn or postpone the SWK Special Meeting and the duration of any such adjournment is subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement.
Approval of the Adjournment Proposal is not required for completion of the Mergers.
Required Vote
SWK Stockholders may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST,” or they may “ABSTAIN” from voting on, the Merger Proposal. The affirmative vote of SWK Stockholders representing a majority of all the votes properly cast at the SWK Special Meeting is required to approve the Adjournment Proposal.
Abstentions will have no effect on the voting outcome of the Adjournment Proposal. Proxies received will be voted "FOR" the approval of the Adjournment Proposal unless SWK Stockholders designate otherwise.
After careful consideration, the SWK Board unanimously recommends that SWK Stockholders vote “FOR” the Adjournment Proposal.
140
Table of Contents
MARKET PRICE, DIVIDEND AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION
Price Range of RWAY Common Stock and Distributions
RWAY Common Stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “RWAY.” The last reported price for shares of RWAY Common Stock on February 25, 2026 was $8.12 per share. As of February 25, 2026, there were approximately 43 holders of record of RWAY Common Stock. The following table sets forth, for each fiscal quarter during the last three fiscal years and the current fiscal year to date: (i) the NAV per share of RWAY Common Stock, (ii) the high and low closing sales prices for RWAY Common Stock and such sales prices as a percentage of NAV per share, and (iii) the dividends and distributions per share of RWAY Common Stock declared during the applicable period.
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Sale Prices(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Period |
|
NAV(1) |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Premium/ (Discount) of High Sale Price to NAV(3) |
|
Premium/ (Discount) of Low Sale Price to NAV(3) |
|
Dividends and Distributions Declared |
||||||
Year ending December 31, 2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through February 25, 2026) |
|
|
N/A |
|
$ |
9.59 |
|
$ |
8.04 |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
Year ending December 31, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
N/A |
|
$ |
10.23 |
|
$ |
8.64 |
|
N/A |
% |
|
N/A |
% |
|
$ |
0.33 |
Third Quarter |
|
|
13.55 |
|
|
11.31 |
|
|
10.16 |
|
(16.5) |
|
|
(25.0) |
|
|
|
0.36 |
Second Quarter |
|
|
13.66 |
|
|
10.73 |
|
|
8.64 |
|
(21.4) |
|
|
(36.7) |
|
|
|
0.35 |
First Quarter |
|
|
13.48 |
|
|
11.63 |
|
|
10.35 |
|
(13.7) |
|
|
(23.2) |
|
|
|
0.36 |
Year ending December 31, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
13.79 |
|
$ |
10.96 |
|
$ |
9.97 |
|
(20.5) |
% |
|
(27.7) |
% |
|
$ |
0.40 |
Third Quarter |
|
|
13.39 |
|
|
12.02 |
|
|
10.10 |
|
(10.2) |
|
|
(24.6) |
|
|
|
0.45 |
Second Quarter |
|
|
13.14 |
|
|
13.25 |
|
|
11.57 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
(11.9) |
|
|
|
0.47 |
First Quarter |
|
|
13.36 |
|
|
13.67 |
|
|
11.56 |
|
2.3 |
|
|
(13.5) |
|
|
|
0.47 |
Year ending December 31, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
13.50 |
|
$ |
13.24 |
|
$ |
11.90 |
|
(1.9) |
% |
|
(11.9) |
% |
|
$ |
0.46 |
Third Quarter |
|
|
14.08 |
|
|
13.55 |
|
|
12.15 |
|
(3.8) |
|
|
(13.7) |
|
|
|
0.45 |
Second Quarter |
|
|
14.17 |
|
|
12.63 |
|
|
10.60 |
|
(10.9) |
|
|
(25.2) |
|
|
|
0.45 |
First Quarter |
|
|
14.07 |
|
|
13.85 |
|
|
10.89 |
|
(1.6) |
|
|
(22.6) |
|
|
|
0.45 |
Year ending December 31, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
14.22 |
|
$ |
13.52 |
|
$ |
11.31 |
|
(4.9) |
% |
|
(20.5) |
% |
|
$ |
0.36 |
Third Quarter |
|
|
14.12 |
|
|
13.81 |
|
|
11.24 |
|
(2.2) |
|
|
(20.4) |
|
|
|
0.33 |
Second Quarter |
|
|
14.14 |
|
|
14.51 |
|
|
10.98 |
|
2.6 |
|
|
(22.3) |
|
|
|
0.30 |
First Quarter |
|
|
14.45 |
|
|
14.77 |
|
|
12.21 |
|
2.2 |
|
|
(15.5) |
|
|
|
0.27 |
Pursuant to the RWAY DRIP, RWAY reinvests all cash dividends or distributions declared by the RWAY Board on behalf of RWAY Stockholders who do not elect to receive their distributions in cash. As a result, if the RWAY Board declares a distribution, then RWAY Stockholders who have not elected to “opt out” of the RWAY DRIP will have their distributions automatically reinvested in additional shares of RWAY Common Stock. See the section entitled “Dividend Reinvestment Plan of RWAY” for additional information regarding the RWAY DRIP.
141
Table of Contents
Price Range of SWK Common Stock and Distributions
SWK Common Stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SWKH.” The last reported price for shares of SWK Common Stock on February 25, 2026 was $16.65 per share. As of February 25, 2026, there were approximately 85 holders of record of SWK Common Stock. The following table sets forth, for each fiscal quarter during the last three fiscal years and the current fiscal year to date (i) the high and low closing sales prices for SWK Common Stock and (ii) the dividends and distributions per share of SWK Common Stock declared during the applicable period.
|
|
Closing Sale Prices(1) |
|
|
|
||||
Period |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Dividends and Distributions Declared |
|||
Year ending December 31, 2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through February 25, 2026) |
|
$ |
17.60 |
|
$ |
16.65 |
|
|
N/A |
Year ending December 31, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
17.75 |
|
$ |
14.40 |
|
$ |
N/A |
Third Quarter |
|
|
15.28 |
|
|
14.02 |
|
|
N/A |
Second Quarter |
|
|
15.23 |
|
|
12.91 |
|
|
4.00 |
First Quarter |
|
|
13.95 |
|
|
12.48 |
|
|
N/A |
Year ending December 31, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
13.52 |
|
$ |
12.01 |
|
$ |
N/A |
Third Quarter |
|
|
14.26 |
|
|
12.99 |
|
|
N/A |
Second Quarter |
|
|
14.06 |
|
|
12.77 |
|
|
N/A |
First Quarter |
|
|
14.23 |
|
|
12.76 |
|
|
N/A |
Year ending December 31, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
14.49 |
|
$ |
12.41 |
|
$ |
N/A |
Third Quarter |
|
|
13.31 |
|
|
12.25 |
|
|
N/A |
Second Quarter |
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
13.07 |
|
|
N/A |
First Quarter |
|
|
15.39 |
|
|
13.94 |
|
|
N/A |
Year ending December 31, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
15.71 |
|
$ |
13.47 |
|
$ |
N/A |
Third Quarter |
|
|
14.84 |
|
|
12.88 |
|
|
N/A |
Second Quarter |
|
|
15.77 |
|
|
13.39 |
|
|
N/A |
First Quarter |
|
|
15.74 |
|
|
13.38 |
|
|
N/A |
142
Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT OF RWAY AND SWK
Please refer to “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors” in RWAY’s most recent definitive proxy statement, filed with the SEC on April 29, 2025, which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, for information relating to the management of RWAY.
Please refer to “Executive Officers” in SWK’s most recent definitive proxy statement, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2025, which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, for information relating to the management of SWK.
143
Table of Contents
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT OF RWAY
The Adviser is responsible for the overall management of RWAY’s activities and is responsible for making investment decisions with respect to RWAY’s portfolio. The portfolio managers of the Adviser meets regularly to consider its investments, review its strategic initiatives and supervise the actions taken by the Adviser on its behalf. In addition, the portfolio managers will review and monitor the performance of the investment portfolio. Each investment must be approved by a majority of the portfolio managers. Runway Growth Capital may increase or decrease the number of its portfolio managers from time to time. All transactions submitted to the portfolio managers will have to demonstrate the following characteristics, each verified in formal due diligence:
The RWAY Board, including a majority of its independent directors, oversees and monitors the investment performance and, beginning with the second anniversary of the effective date of the RWAY Investment Advisory Agreement, will annually review the compensation we pay to the Adviser.
The following individuals (the “RWAY Portfolio Managers”) have senior responsibility for the management of RWAY’s investment portfolio: David Spreng, Thomas B. Raterman, Greg Greifeld and Patrick Schafer. The Adviser has primary responsibility for the day-to-day implementation and management of RWAY’s investment portfolio.
Information regarding the business experience of the RWAY Portfolio Managers is set forth below.
R. David Spreng
David Spreng is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of the Adviser. Mr. Spreng previously served as a Partner of Decathlon Capital Partners, which he co-founded in 2010. He also served as Managing Partner of Crescendo Ventures, which he co-founded in 1998. He founded IAI Ventures in 1994, before which he served as Vice President and then Senior Vice President of Investment Advisers Inc. from 1989 to 1994.
Thomas B. Raterman
Thomas Raterman has served as Chief Financial Officer of the Adviser since 2015, as well as Chief Operating Officer since 2021. Mr. Raterman formerly served as Director, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of GSV Financial Group from 2011 to 2016. Mr. Raterman also served as chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a boutique financial advisory firm, InterOcean Financial Group LLC, and its wholly owned subsidiaries from 2006 to 2009. In addition, he was co-founder and served as Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Central Region Manager of LKQ Corporation from 1998 to 2001. Mr. Raterman also served as a Vice President of Flynn Enterprises, Inc. from 1995 to 2001. Earlier in his career, Mr. Raterman worked at several leading commercial lending firms including GE Capital, Continental Illinois National Bank and Security Pacific Bank.
144
Table of Contents
Greg Greifeld
Greg Greifeld joined the Adviser in 2015 and currently serves as the Chief Investment Officer. Prior to joining the Adviser, Mr. Greifeld held roles at HPS Investment Partners and in the Investment Banking division and Special Investments Group at J.P. Morgan.
Patrick Schafer
Patrick Schafer joined BC Partners in 2018 and is a Partner in the Credit team. Previously, Mr. Schafer worked at Apollo Global Management for seven years, including as Managing Director of the Direct Originations team in the Apollo Opportunistic Credit Group. Prior to this, he worked for over three years at Deutsche Bank Securities in its Investment Banking Division.
Equity Securities
The dollar range of equity securities in RWAY beneficially owned at December 31, 2024 by each RWAY Portfolio Manager is as follows:
Name |
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in RWAY(1) |
R. David Spreng |
|
Over $1,000,000 |
Thomas B. Raterman |
|
$100,001—$500,000 |
Greg Greifeld |
|
$50,001—$100,000 |
Patrick Schafer |
|
None |
Other Accounts Managed
The information below lists the number of other accounts for which each Portfolio Manager was primarily responsible for the day-to-day management as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
Name of RWAY Portfolio Managers |
|
Type of Accounts |
|
Total No. of Other Accounts Managed |
|
Total Other Assets |
|
No. of Other Accounts where Advisory Fee is Based on Performance |
|
Total Assets in Other Accounts where Advisory Fee is Based on Performance (in millions)(2) |
||
R. David Spreng |
|
Registered Investment Companies |
|
0 |
|
$ |
- |
|
0 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
|
2 |
|
|
298 |
|
1 |
|
|
229 |
|
|
Other Accounts |
|
1 |
|
|
50 |
|
0 |
|
|
- |
Thomas B. Raterman |
|
Registered Investment Companies |
|
0 |
|
$ |
- |
|
0 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
|
2 |
|
|
298 |
|
1 |
|
|
229 |
|
|
Other Accounts |
|
1 |
|
|
50 |
|
0 |
|
|
- |
Greg Greifeld |
|
Registered Investment Companies |
|
0 |
|
$ |
- |
|
0 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
|
2 |
|
|
298 |
|
1 |
|
|
229 |
|
|
Other Accounts |
|
1 |
|
|
50 |
|
0 |
|
|
- |
Patrick Schafer |
|
Registered Investment Companies |
|
6 |
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
6 |
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
|
8 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
8 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
Other Accounts |
|
3 |
|
|
822 |
|
1 |
|
|
13 |
Compensation
None of the Adviser’s investment professionals receive any direct compensation from RWAY in connection with the management of our portfolio.
145
Table of Contents
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS OF RWAY
Please refer to “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in RWAY’s most recent definitive proxy statement, filed with the SEC on April 29, 2025, which is incorporated by reference to this proxy statement/prospectus.
BUSINESS OF RWAY
The information in “Item 1. Business” and “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in Part I of RWAY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 814-01180) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, in “Item 1. Legal Proceedings” in Part II of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, in “Item 1. Legal Proceedings” in Part II of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, and in “Item 1. Legal Proceedings” in Part II of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 is incorporated herein by reference.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS OF RWAY
The information in “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 12. Financial Highlights” of RWAY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 814-01180) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, in “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 12. Financial Highlights” of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, in “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 12. Financial Highlights” of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, and in “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 12. Financial Highlights” of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 is incorporated herein by reference.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF RWAY
The information in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II of RWAY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 814-01180) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I of RWAY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, and in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I of RWAY's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 814-01180) for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 is incorporated herein by reference.
SENIOR SECURITIES OF RWAY
The information in “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7. Borrowings—Senior Securities” in the Index to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of RWAY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 814-01180) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 is incorporated herein by reference.
146
Table of Contents
PORTFOLIO COMPANIES OF RWAY
The following table sets forth certain information as of September 30, 2025, for each portfolio company in which RWAY had an investment. Information in the table is presented in thousands, except share amounts.
Portfolio Company |
|
Address |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) |
|
Shares |
|
Percentage of Class Held on a Fully Diluted Basis |
|
Cost ($) |
|
Fair |
||||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Debt Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Airship Group, Inc. |
|
1225 West Burnside Suite 401 Portland, OR 97209 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+3.75%, 9.08% floor, 3.00% PIK, 3.25% ETP |
|
6/15/2028 |
|
50,263 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
50,049 |
|
|
50,632 |
|
|
Blueshift Labs, Inc. |
|
433 California Street Suite 800 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+8.25% PIK, 11.25% floor, 1.50% ETP |
|
12/15/2028 |
|
27,702 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
27,529 |
|
|
23,272 |
|
|
Blueshift Labs, Inc. |
|
|
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+8.25% PIK, 11.25% floor |
|
12/15/2028 |
|
532 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
532 |
|
|
941 |
|
|
Blueshift Labs, Inc. |
|
|
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+8.25% PIK, 11.25% floor |
|
12/15/2028 |
|
750 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
743 |
|
|
998 |
|
|
CarNow, Inc. |
|
1100 Circle 75 Parkway Suite 800 Atlanta, GA 30339 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.25%, 11.75% floor, 1.60% ETP |
|
3/22/2029 |
|
20,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
18,135 |
|
|
18,804 |
|
|
Piano Software, Inc. |
|
111 S. Independence Mall E, Suite 950 Philadelphia, PA 19106 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.25%, 11.25% floor, 1.50% ETP |
|
12/31/2029 |
|
43,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
42,126 |
|
|
42,864 |
|
|
VTX Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (dba VertexOne) |
|
1321 Upland Drive Suite 8389 Houston, TX 77043 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 8.00% floor, 1.00% PIK, 3.00% ETP |
|
9/24/2029 |
|
35,270 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
35,093 |
|
|
34,895 |
|
|
VTX Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (dba VertexOne) |
|
|
|
Second Lien |
|
FIXED 12.50% PIK, 31.05% ETP |
|
9/24/2029 |
|
6,426 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
6,185 |
|
|
6,210 |
|
|
Zinnia Corporate Holdings, LLC |
|
600 Steamboat Road Suite 105 Greenwich, CT 06830 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+5.50%, 7.50% floor |
|
9/21/2029 |
|
40,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
39,326 |
|
|
40,020 |
|
|
Total Application Software - 44.66%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,718 |
|
|
218,636 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Bombora, Inc. |
|
102 Madison Avenue Floor 5 New York, NY 10016 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+4.75%, 6.75% floor, 3.25% PIK, 1.10% ETP |
|
1/15/2028 |
|
30,634 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
30,652 |
|
|
30,802 |
|
|
Elevate Services, Inc. |
|
2375 East Camelback Road Suite 690 Phoenix, AZ 85016 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.50%, 12.78% floor, 0.50% ETP |
|
7/10/2027 |
|
39,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
38,231 |
|
|
39,195 |
|
|
Shepherd Intermediate, LLC (dba FHAS) |
|
117 West Main Street Plymouth, PA 18651 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.25%, 8.25% floor |
|
7/10/2030 |
|
7,500 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
7,376 |
|
|
7,391 |
|
|
Shepherd Intermediate, LLC (dba FHAS) (Revolver) |
|
|
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.25%, 8.25% floor |
|
7/10/2030 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
(6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Swing Education, Inc. |
|
2041 East Street, Suite 884 Concord, CA 94520 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 10.80% floor, 3.50% ETP |
|
6/15/2029 |
|
8,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
7,886 |
|
|
7,887 |
|
|
Swing Education, Inc. (Revolver) |
|
|
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+6.65%, 10.45% floor |
|
6/1/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
(183) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Total Commercial & Professional Services - 17.42%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,956 |
|
|
85,275 |
||||||
147
Table of Contents
Portfolio Company |
|
Address |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) |
|
Shares |
|
Percentage of Class Held on a Fully Diluted Basis |
|
Cost ($) |
|
Fair |
||||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Debt Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Marley Spoon SE |
|
Paul-Lincke-Ufer 39-40 10999 Berlin, Germany |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+ 8.75% PIK, 9.51% floor, 1.00% ETP |
|
6/15/2027 |
|
43,863 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
44,014 |
|
|
34,469 |
|
|
Marley Spoon SE |
|
|
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+ 8.75% PIK, 9.51% floor |
|
6/15/2027 |
|
2,892 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
2,892 |
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
Marley Spoon SE |
|
|
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+ 8.75% PIK, 9.51% floor |
|
11/15/2025 |
|
3,975 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
Total Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail - 8.14%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,881 |
|
|
39,866 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Autobooks, Inc. |
|
1505 Woodward Ave., Suite 700 Detroit, MI 48226 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.50%, 11.77% floor, 2.75% ETP |
|
2/5/2028 |
|
28,600 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
28,011 |
|
|
28,020 |
|
|
Hurricane Cleanco Limited |
|
The Brunei Building, 2 Canalside Walk, London, United Kingdom, W2 1DG |
|
Senior Secured |
|
FIXED 6.25%, 6.25% PIK |
|
11/22/2029 |
|
30,006 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
28,052 |
|
|
30,352 |
|
|
Vesta Payment Solutions, Inc. |
|
5400 Meadows Road, 5th Floor Lake Oswego, OR 97035 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 9.00% floor, 6.00% ETP |
|
11/15/2026 |
|
25,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
25,848 |
|
|
22,146 |
|
|
Total Financial Services - 16.45%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,911 |
|
|
80,518 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
EBR Systems, Inc. |
|
480 Oakmead Parkway Sunnyvale, CA 94085 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+4.90%, 8.90% floor, 4.50% ETP |
|
6/15/2027 |
|
40,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
40,509 |
|
|
41,011 |
|
|
Mingle Healthcare Solutions, Inc. |
|
8911 Sandy Parkway Suite 200 Sandy, UT 84070 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+9.75%, 12.26% floor, 10.50% ETP |
|
12/15/2026 |
|
4,127 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
Moximed, Inc. |
|
46602 Landing Parkway Fremont, CA 94538 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+5.25%, 8.75% floor, 3.50% ETP |
|
7/1/2027 |
|
15,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
15,198 |
|
|
15,427 |
|
|
Onward Medical, N.V. |
|
Schimmelt 2 5611 ZX Eindhoven Netherlands |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+6.50%, 10.75% floor, 2.50% ETP |
|
6/15/2028 |
|
17,088 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
16,833 |
|
|
17,080 |
|
|
Route 92 Medical, Inc. |
|
155 Bovet Road Suite 100 San Mateo, CA 94402 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 9.00% floor, 3.95% ETP |
|
3/31/2029 |
|
35,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
34,317 |
|
|
34,746 |
|
|
Total Health Care Equipment & Services - 22.60%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,614 |
|
|
110,627 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Household & Personal Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Madison Reed, Inc. |
|
548 Market St PMB 17871, San Francisco, CA 94104 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+5.00%, 12.50% floor, 3.00% ETP |
|
8/29/2029 |
|
40,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
39,230 |
|
|
39,234 |
|
|
Total Household & Personal Products - 8.01%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,230 |
|
|
39,234 |
||||||
148
Table of Contents
Portfolio Company |
|
Address |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) |
|
Shares |
|
Percentage of Class Held on a Fully Diluted Basis |
|
Cost ($) |
|
Fair |
||||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Debt Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Kin Insurance, Inc. |
|
222 Merchandise Mart Plaza Suite 910 Chicago, IL 60654 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+5.00%, 12.00% floor, 2.00% ETP |
|
8/13/2029 |
|
45,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
43,782 |
|
|
43,786 |
|
|
Total Insurance - 8.95%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,782 |
|
|
43,786 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media & Entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Skillshare, Inc. |
|
215 Park Avenue South 11th Floor New York, NY 10003 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+6.75%, 10.96% floor, 2.00% ETP |
|
2/8/2029 |
|
12,614 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
12,458 |
|
|
12,462 |
|
|
Snap! Mobile, Inc. |
|
8300 7th Avenue South Seattle, WA 98108 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.50%, 12.10% floor, 3.83% ETP |
|
9/30/2028 |
|
18,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
17,699 |
|
|
17,724 |
|
|
Total Media & Entertainment - 6.17%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,157 |
|
|
30,186 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systems Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
3PL Central LLC (dba Extensiv) |
|
100 North Pacific Coast Highway Suite 1100 El Segundo, CA 90245 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 9.00% floor, 5.00% ETP |
|
3/31/2026 |
|
72,290 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
75,421 |
|
|
70,266 |
|
|
Digicert, Inc. |
|
2801 North Thanksgiving Way Suite 500 Lehi, UT 84043 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+5.75%, 6.50% floor |
|
7/30/2030 |
|
9,327 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
9,191 |
|
|
9,362 |
|
|
Digicert, Inc. (Revolver) |
|
|
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+5.75%, 6.50% floor |
|
7/30/2030 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
(9) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Circadence Corporation |
|
1900 9th Street Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80302 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+9.50%, 12.26% floor, 7.50% ETP |
|
12/15/2025 |
|
22,002 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
23,352 |
|
|
19,358 |
|
|
Synack, Inc. |
|
303 Twin Dolphin Drive, 6th Floor Redwood City, CA 94065 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.00%, 11.07% floor, 1.00% ETP |
|
12/29/2028 |
|
45,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
44,887 |
|
|
45,074 |
|
|
Total Systems Software - 29.43%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,842 |
|
|
144,060 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Hardware & Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Brivo, Inc. |
|
7700 Old Georgetown Road Suite 300 Bethesda, MD 20814 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
SOFR+7.25%, 11.29% floor, 2.53% ETP |
|
12/15/2029 |
|
40,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
39,856 |
|
|
41,003 |
|
|
Dejero Labs Inc. |
|
410 Albert Street Suite 200 Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3V3 Canada |
|
Second Lien |
|
SOFR+8.00%, 8.50% floor, 2.00% PIK, 3.00% ETP |
|
12/22/2025 |
|
14,685 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
15,036 |
|
|
14,967 |
|
|
Linxup, LLC |
|
424 South Woods Mill Road Suite 210 Chesterfield, MO 63017 United States |
|
Senior Secured |
|
PRIME+3.25%, 11.75% floor, 2.25% ETP |
|
11/15/2027 |
|
30,000 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
29,983 |
|
|
30,655 |
|
|
Total Technology Hardware & Equipment - 17.70%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,875 |
|
|
86,625 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Investments - 179.53%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
898,966 |
|
|
878,813 |
|||||||
149
Table of Contents
Portfolio Company |
|
Address |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) |
|
Shares |
|
Percentage of Class Held on a Fully Diluted Basis |
|
Cost ($) |
|
Fair |
||||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Equity Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Aria Systems, Inc. |
|
575 Market Street 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 United States |
|
Equity |
|
Series G Preferred Stock |
|
N/A |
|
289,419 |
|
N/A |
|
0.10% |
|
|
250 |
|
|
323 |
|
|
VTX Holdings, LLC |
|
1321 Upland Drive Suite 8389 Houston, TX 77043 United States |
|
Equity |
|
Series C Preferred Units |
|
N/A |
|
3,015,219 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
143 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
Total Application Software - 0.07%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
346 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
FiscalNote, Inc. |
|
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue North West 6th Floor Washington, DC 20004 United States |
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
19,240 |
|
N/A |
|
0.13% |
|
|
438 |
|
|
89 |
|
|
JobGet Holdings, Inc. (fka Snagajob, Inc.) |
|
50 Milk Street Boston, MA 02109 United States |
|
Equity |
|
Series C-1 Preferred Stock |
|
N/A |
|
476,564 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
39,275 |
|
|
27,200 |
|
|
JobGet Holdings, Inc. (fka Snagajob, Inc.) |
|
|
|
Equity |
|
Series C-2 Preferred Stock |
|
N/A |
|
16,963 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Total Commercial & Professional Services - 5.57%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,713 |
|
|
27,289 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marley Spoon SE |
|
Paul-Lincke-Ufer 39-40 10999 Berlin, Germany |
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
46,004 |
|
N/A |
|
0.22% |
|
|
410 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
Total Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail - 0.00%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
19 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
CareCloud, Inc. |
|
7 Clyde Road Somerset Franklin Township, NJ 08873 United States |
|
Equity |
|
8.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock |
|
N/A |
|
462,064 |
|
N/A |
|
7.34% |
|
|
12,132 |
|
|
9,669 |
|
|
Total Health Care Equipment & Services - 1.98%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,132 |
|
|
9,669 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media & Entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Minute Media Inc. |
|
10 Northburgh St, London EC1V 0AT, United Kingdom |
|
Equity |
|
Preferred Stock |
|
N/A |
|
1,039 |
|
N/A |
|
0.00% |
|
|
120 |
|
|
171 |
|
|
Minute Media Inc. |
|
|
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
136 |
|
N/A |
|
0.01% |
|
|
16 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
Total Media & Entertainment - 0.04%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
192 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity Investments - 7.66%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,784 |
|
|
37,515 |
|||||||
150
Table of Contents
Portfolio Company |
|
Address |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) |
|
Shares |
|
Percentage of Class Held on a Fully Diluted Basis |
|
Cost ($) |
|
Fair |
||||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
3DNA Corp. (dba NationBuilder) |
|
PO Box 811428 Los Angeles, CA 90081 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series C-1 Preferred Stock |
|
12/28/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
273,164 |
|
N/A |
|
|
104 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Airship Group, Inc. |
|
1225 West Burnside Suite 401 Portland, OR 97209 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series F Preferred Stock |
|
6/28/2034 |
|
N/A |
|
519,313 |
|
N/A |
|
|
414 |
|
|
442 |
|
|
Aria Systems, Inc. |
|
575 Market Street 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series G Preferred Stock |
|
6/29/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
2,387,705 |
|
N/A |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
Blueshift Labs, Inc. |
|
433 California Street Suite 800 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
167 |
|
|
166 |
|
|
CarNow, Inc. |
|
1100 Circle 75 Parkway Suite 800 Atlanta, GA 30339 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/22/2034 |
|
N/A |
|
200,000 |
|
N/A |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
INRIX, Inc. |
|
10210 North East Points Drive Suite 400 Kirkland, WA 98033 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
7/26/2029 |
|
N/A |
|
150,804 |
|
N/A |
|
|
522 |
|
|
326 |
|
|
JWP Holdco LLC (fka Longtail Ad Solutions, Inc.) |
|
530 7th Avenue Suite 1906 New York, NY 10018 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Units |
|
12/12/2029 |
|
N/A |
|
167,827 |
|
N/A |
|
|
47 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Piano Software, Inc. |
|
111 S. Independence Mall E, Suite 950 Philadelphia, PA 19106 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
12/31/2034 |
|
N/A |
|
119,978 |
|
N/A |
|
|
348 |
|
|
491 |
|
|
Predactiv, Inc. (fka Sharethis, Inc.) |
|
3000 El Camino Real Building 4, Suite 200 Palo Alto, CA 94306 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series D-3 Preferred Stock |
|
12/3/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
647,615 |
|
N/A |
|
|
2,162 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Total Application Software - 1.18%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,212 |
|
|
5,780 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
AllClear ID, Inc. |
|
9600 Escarpment Boulevard Suite 745 Number 225 Austin, TX 78749 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
8/31/2027 |
|
N/A |
|
870,514 |
|
N/A |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Bombora, Inc. |
|
102 Madison Avenue Floor 5 New York, NY 10016 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/31/2031 |
|
N/A |
|
121,581 |
|
N/A |
|
|
174 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
Bombora, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
12/26/2033 |
|
N/A |
|
54,711 |
|
N/A |
|
|
48 |
|
|
51 |
|
|
CloudPay, Inc. |
|
Kingsgate House, Newbury Road Andover SP10 4DU England, United Kingdom |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B Preferred Stock |
|
6/30/2030 |
|
N/A |
|
11,273 |
|
N/A |
|
|
218 |
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
CloudPay, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
8/17/2031 |
|
N/A |
|
3,502 |
|
N/A |
|
|
52 |
|
|
86 |
|
|
CloudPay, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
9/26/2032 |
|
N/A |
|
5,252 |
|
N/A |
|
|
176 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
Elevate Services, Inc. |
|
2375 East Camelback Road Suite 690 Phoenix, AZ 85016 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
7/10/2033 |
|
N/A |
|
248,997 |
|
N/A |
|
|
447 |
|
|
416 |
|
|
Elevate Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
7/17/2034 |
|
N/A |
|
236,549 |
|
N/A |
|
|
377 |
|
|
536 |
|
|
FiscalNote, Inc. |
|
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue North West 6th Floor Washington, DC 20004 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Earnout |
|
7/29/2027 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
127 |
|
|
- |
|
|
JobGet Holdings, Inc. (fka Snagajob, Inc.) |
|
50 Milk Street Boston, MA 02109 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B-1 Preferred Stock |
|
9/29/2031 |
|
N/A |
|
763,269 |
|
N/A |
|
|
343 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Swing Education, Inc. |
|
2041 East Street, Suite 884 Concord, CA 94520 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
6/27/2035 |
|
N/A |
|
196,160 |
|
N/A |
|
|
19 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
Total Commercial & Professional Services - 0.54%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
2,666 |
||||||
151
Table of Contents
Portfolio Company |
|
Address |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) |
|
Shares |
|
Percentage of Class Held on a Fully Diluted Basis |
|
Cost ($) |
|
Fair |
||||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Financial Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Autobooks, Inc. |
|
1505 Woodward Ave., Suite 700 Detroit, MI 48226 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Success Fee |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
489 |
|
|
508 |
|
|
Betterment Holdings, Inc. |
|
450 West 33rd Street Eleventh Floor New York, NY 10001 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
10/6/2033 |
|
N/A |
|
7,680 |
|
N/A |
|
|
35 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
Betterment Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
10/6/2033 |
|
N/A |
|
9,818 |
|
N/A |
|
|
40 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
Credit Sesame, Inc. |
|
444 Castro Street Suite 500 Mountain View, CA 94041 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
1/7/2030 |
|
N/A |
|
191,601 |
|
N/A |
|
|
425 |
|
|
529 |
|
|
Total Financial Services - 0.24%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
1,165 |
||||||
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Allurion Technologies, Inc. |
|
11 Huron Drive Natick, MA 01760 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/30/2031 |
|
N/A |
|
5,320 |
|
N/A |
|
|
282 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Allurion Technologies, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/30/2031 |
|
N/A |
|
1,851 |
|
N/A |
|
|
141 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Allurion Technologies, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
9/15/2032 |
|
N/A |
|
1,850 |
|
N/A |
|
|
144 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Allurion Technologies, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Earnout |
|
8/1/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
EBR Systems, Inc. |
|
480 Oakmead Parkway Sunnyvale, CA 94085 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
6/30/2032 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
605 |
|
|
602 |
|
|
Mingle Healthcare Solutions, Inc. |
|
8911 Sandy Parkway Suite 200 Sandy, UT 84070 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series CC Preferred Stock |
|
8/15/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
1,770,973 |
|
N/A |
|
|
492 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Moximed, Inc. |
|
46602 Landing Parkway Fremont, CA 94538 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
6/24/2032 |
|
N/A |
|
214,285 |
|
N/A |
|
|
175 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
Nalu Medical, Inc. |
|
2320 Faraday Avenue Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series D-2 Preferred Stock |
|
10/12/2032 |
|
N/A |
|
91,717 |
|
N/A |
|
|
173 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
Onward Medical, N.V. |
|
Schimmelt 2 5611 ZX Eindhoven Netherlands |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
9/26/2034 |
|
N/A |
|
165,338 |
|
N/A |
|
|
340 |
|
|
459 |
|
|
Route 92 Medical, Inc. |
|
155 Bovet Road Suite 100 San Mateo, CA 94402 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
3/31/2035 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
833 |
|
|
649 |
|
|
SetPoint Medical Corporation |
|
25101 Rye Canyon Loop Valencia, CA 91355 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B Preferred Stock |
|
6/29/2031 |
|
N/A |
|
400,000 |
|
N/A |
|
|
14 |
|
|
142 |
|
|
SetPoint Medical Corporation |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Series B Preferred Stock |
|
12/29/2032 |
|
N/A |
|
600,000 |
|
N/A |
|
|
74 |
|
|
213 |
|
|
VERO Biotech LLC |
|
387 Technology Circle North West Suite 125 Atlanta, GA 30313 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
12/29/2025 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
377 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Total Health Care Equipment & Services - 0.43%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
2,123 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Household & Personal Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Madison Reed, Inc. |
|
548 Market St PMB 17871, San Francisco, CA 94104 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
404 |
|
|
414 |
|
|
Total Household & Personal Products - 0.08%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
414 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Kin Insurance, Inc. |
|
222 Merchandise Mart Plaza Suite 910 Chicago, IL 60654 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series D-3 Preferred Stock |
|
9/26/2032 |
|
N/A |
|
62,364 |
|
N/A |
|
|
426 |
|
|
374 |
|
|
Kin Insurance, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Series E Preferred Stock |
|
8/13/2035 |
|
N/A |
|
15,928 |
|
N/A |
|
|
818 |
|
|
819 |
|
|
Total Insurance - 0.25%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
1,193 |
||||||
152
Table of Contents
Portfolio Company |
|
Address |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) |
|
Shares |
|
Percentage of Class Held on a Fully Diluted Basis |
|
Cost ($) |
|
Fair |
||||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Media & Entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Skillshare, Inc. |
|
215 Park Avenue South 11th Floor New York, NY 10003 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
337 |
|
|
309 |
|
|
Snap! Mobile, Inc. |
|
8300 7th Avenue South Seattle, WA 98108 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series B Preferred Stock |
|
9/30/2034 |
|
N/A |
|
19,140 |
|
N/A |
|
|
345 |
|
|
293 |
|
|
Total Media & Entertainment - 0.12%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
602 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Mustang Bio, Inc. |
|
377 Plantation Street Worcester, MA 01605 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/4/2032 |
|
N/A |
|
997 |
|
N/A |
|
|
315 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Total Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences - 0.00%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
- |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Systems Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Circadence Corporation |
|
1900 9th Street Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80302 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-6 Preferred Stock |
|
12/20/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
1,538,462 |
|
N/A |
|
|
3,630 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Circadence Corporation |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-6 Preferred Stock |
|
10/31/2029 |
|
N/A |
|
384,615 |
|
N/A |
|
|
846 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Circadence Corporation |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
304 |
|
|
433 |
|
|
Scale Computing, Inc. |
|
525 South Meridian Suite 3E Indianapolis, IN 46225 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/29/2029 |
|
N/A |
|
9,665,667 |
|
N/A |
|
|
346 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Synack, Inc. |
|
303 Twin Dolphin Drive, 6th Floor Redwood City, CA 94065 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
6/30/2032 |
|
N/A |
|
131,521 |
|
N/A |
|
|
168 |
|
|
191 |
|
|
Total Systems Software - 0.13%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
624 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Hardware & Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Brivo, Inc. |
|
7700 Old Georgetown Road Suite 300 Bethesda, MD 20814 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-2 Preferred Stock |
|
10/20/2032 |
|
N/A |
|
201,000 |
|
N/A |
|
|
98 |
|
|
371 |
|
|
Brivo, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-2 Preferred Stock |
|
12/27/2034 |
|
N/A |
|
32,109 |
|
N/A |
|
|
43 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
Dejero Labs Inc. |
|
410 Albert Street Suite 200 Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3V3 Canada |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
5/31/2029 |
|
N/A |
|
333,621 |
|
N/A |
|
|
192 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
Linxup, LLC |
|
424 South Woods Mill Road Suite 210 Chesterfield, MO 63017 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Success fee |
|
11/3/2033 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
253 |
|
|
241 |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
600 Hatheway Road Suite 105 Vancouver, WA 98661 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-1 Preferred Stock |
|
10/5/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
73,746 |
|
N/A |
|
|
89 |
|
|
134 |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
10/5/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
38,705 |
|
N/A |
|
|
47 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-1 Preferred Stock |
|
12/28/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
14,749 |
|
N/A |
|
|
16 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
12/28/2028 |
|
N/A |
|
7,742 |
|
N/A |
|
|
9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Series A-1 Preferred Stock |
|
6/27/2029 |
|
N/A |
|
81,251 |
|
N/A |
|
|
250 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
RealWear, Inc. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
6/27/2029 |
|
N/A |
|
42,643 |
|
N/A |
|
|
131 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total Technology Hardware & Equipment - 0.21%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
1,020 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Warrants - 3.18%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,649 |
|
|
15,587 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments - 190.37%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
976,399 |
|
|
931,915 |
||||||||
153
Table of Contents
Portfolio Company |
|
Address |
|
Investment Type |
|
Investment |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Principal ($) |
|
Shares |
|
Percentage of Class Held on a Fully Diluted Basis |
|
Cost ($) |
|
Fair |
||||
Affiliate Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Equity Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Coginiti Corp |
|
464 Monterey Avenue Suite E Los Gatos, CA 95030 United States |
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
1,040,160 |
|
10.17% |
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Total Application Software - 0.00%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
- |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity Investments - 0.00%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
- |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Application Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Coginiti Corp |
|
464 Monterey Avenue Suite E Los Gatos, CA 95030 United States |
|
Warrants |
|
Common Stock |
|
3/9/2030 |
|
N/A |
|
811,770 |
|
N/A |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Total Application Software - 0.00%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Warrants - 0.00%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments - 0.00%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
- |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Equity Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Commercial & Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Pivot3, Inc. |
|
205 North Michigan Ave Suite 4200 Chicago IL 60601 United States |
|
Equity |
|
100% Equity Interest |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
100.00% |
|
|
950 |
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
Total Commercial & Professional Services - 0.24%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
1,194 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-Sector Holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Runway-Cadma I LLC |
|
205 North Michigan Ave Suite 4200 Chicago IL 60601 United States |
|
Equity |
|
50% Equity Interest |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
50.00% |
|
|
12,283 |
|
|
12,855 |
|
|
Total Multi-Sector Holdings - 2.63%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,283 |
|
|
12,855 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity Investments - 2.87%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,233 |
|
|
14,049 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments - 2.87%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,233 |
|
|
14,049 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments - 193.24%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
994,183 |
|
$ |
945,964 |
||||||||
*Fair value as a percentage of net assets.
154
Table of Contents
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF RWAY
The following table sets forth, as of February 27, 2026, the beneficial ownership information of each current director, as well as RWAY’s executive officers, each person known to RWAY to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding shares of RWAY’s common stock, and the executive officers and directors as a group. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 36,134,037 shares of RWAY’s Common Stock outstanding as of February 27, 2026.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. Ownership information for those persons who beneficially own 5% or more of the shares of RWAY Common Stock is based upon filings by such persons with the SEC and other information obtained from such persons, if available.
Unless otherwise indicated, RWAY believes that each beneficial owner set forth in the table below has sole voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned by such beneficial owner. The directors are divided into two groups — interested directors and independent directors. Each interested director is an “interested person” (as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) of RWAY. The address of all executive officers and directors is c/o Runway Growth Finance Corp. at 205 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 4200, Chicago, Illinois, 60601.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number of Shares(1) |
|
Percentage of Class |
|
Directors and Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Kwon Chou |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Alexander Duka |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Catherine Frey |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Gary Kovacs |
|
80,530 |
|
* |
|
Julie Persily |
|
24,159 |
|
* |
|
Robert Warshauer |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Interested Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
Ted Goldthorpe |
|
— |
|
— |
|
R. David Spreng(2) |
|
223,872 |
|
* |
|
Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas B. Raterman |
|
88,360 |
|
* |
|
Colleen Corwell |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (10 persons) |
|
416,920 |
|
1.15 |
% |
5% or More Holders |
|
|
|
|
|
OCM Growth Holdings, LLC(3) |
|
7,029,668 |
|
19.45 |
% |
* Represents less than 1%.
155
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth, as of February 27, 2026, the dollar range of the RWAY equity securities beneficially owned by each of the current directors of RWAY.
Name of Director |
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities($)(1)(2) |
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Funds Overseen or to be Overseen by Director in Family of Investment Companies |
Independent Directors |
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Kwon Chou |
|
None |
|
None |
Alexander Duka |
|
None |
|
None |
Catherine Frey |
|
None |
|
None |
Gary Kovacs |
|
Over $100,000 |
|
None |
Julie Persily |
|
Over $100,000 |
|
None |
Robert Warshauer |
|
None |
|
None |
Non-Independent Directors |
|
|
|
|
Ted Goldthorpe |
|
None |
|
None |
R. David Spreng |
|
Over $100,000 |
|
None |
There were no equity interests beneficially owned in any of the other funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates by any of RWAY’s independent directors and his or her immediate family as of February 27, 2026.
156
Table of Contents
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS OF SWK
Please refer to “Certain Transactions with Related Persons” in SWK’s most recent definitive proxy statement, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2025, which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
BUSINESS OF SWK
The information in “Item 1. Business” in Part I of SWK’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 001-39184) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 is incorporated herein by reference.
PROPERTIES
The information in “Item 2. Properties” in Part I of SWK’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 001-39184) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 is incorporated herein by reference.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information in “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in Part I of SWK’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 001-39184) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and “Item 1. Legal Proceedings” of SWK’s Quarterly Report (file no. 001-39184) for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 are incorporated herein by reference.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF SWK
The information in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II of SWK’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 001-39184) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I of SWK’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-39184) for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I of SWK’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-39184) for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 and in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I of SWK’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-39184) for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 is incorporated herein by reference.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information in “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Part II of SWK’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 001-39184) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” of SWK’s Quarterly Report (file no. 001-39184) for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 are incorporated herein by reference are incorporated herein by reference.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
The information in “Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure” in Part II of SWK’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 001-39184) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 is incorporated herein by reference.
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF SWK
The table below sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of SWK Common Stock as of February 27, 2026 by the following individuals or groups:
157
Table of Contents
Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Applicable percentage ownership in the following table is based on 12,095,906 shares of SWK Common Stock outstanding as of February 27, 2026 as adjusted to include options and warrants exercisable within 60 days of February 27, 2026 held by the indicated stockholder or stockholders. Ownership information for those persons who beneficially own 5% or more of the shares of SWK Common Stock is based upon filings by such persons with the SEC and other information obtained from such persons, if available.
Unless otherwise indicated, the principal address of each of the stockholders below is c/o SWK Holdings Corporation. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock held by them. To determine the number of shares beneficially owned by persons other than SWK’s directors, executive officers and their affiliates, we have relied on beneficial ownership reports filed by such persons with the SEC.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number of Shares(1) |
|
|
Percentage of Class |
||||
Directors and Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Independent Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Laurie L. Dotter |
|
|
16,791 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
Jerry Albright |
|
|
10,832 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
Robert K. Hatcher |
|
|
16,662 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Joe D. Staggs |
|
|
116,729 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
Adam Rice |
|
|
15,247 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (5 persons) |
|
|
176,261 |
|
|
1.46 |
|
% |
|
5% or More Holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Carlson Capital, L.P.(2) |
|
|
8,493,088 |
|
|
70.21 |
|
% |
|
M3 Funds, LLC(3) |
|
|
770,770 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
5% or More Holders as a Group |
|
|
9,263,858 |
|
|
76.58 |
|
% |
|
* Represents less than 1%.
Control Person
A “control person” is a shareholder that owns beneficially or through controlled companies more than 25% of the voting securities of a company or acknowledges the existence of control. A controlling person may determine the outcome of any matter affecting and voted on by SWK Stockholders. Entities affiliated with Carlson Capital, L.P. beneficially owns approximately 70.21% of SWK’s outstanding common stock as of February 27, 2026. As a result, Clint D. Carlson has effective voting control over matters submitted for stockholder approval.
158
Table of Contents
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF RWAY
The following is a brief description of the securities of RWAY registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act. This description of the terms of our shares of common stock, par value $0.01 (“Shares,” each a “Share”) does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable provisions of Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”), and the full text of RWAY’s charter and bylaws. As of December 31, 2019 and the date hereof, RWAY’s common stock is the only class of its securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
Stock
Our authorized stock consists of 100,000,000 shares, par value $0.01 per share, all of which are initially designated as common stock. There are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase RWAY stock. No stock has been authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans. Under Maryland law, RWAY stockholders generally are not personally liable for RWAY’s debts or obligations. The following are RWAY’s outstanding classes of securities as of February 27, 2026:
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
Title of Class |
|
Amount Authorized |
|
Amount Held by RWAY or for its Account |
|
Amount Outstanding Exclusive of Amount Shown Under (3) |
Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
100,000,000 |
|
— |
|
36,134,037 |
Under its charter, the RWAY board of directors (the “RWAY Board”) is authorized to classify and reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other classes or series of stock without obtaining stockholder approval. As permitted by the MGCL, RWAY’s charter provides that the RWAY Board, without any action by its stockholders, may amend the charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that RWAY has authority to issue.
Common Stock
All shares of RWAY Common Stock have equal rights as to earnings, assets, voting, and dividends and, when they are issued, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. Distributions may be paid to the holders of RWAY Common Stock if, as and when authorized by the RWAY Board Directors and declared by RWAY out of assets legally available therefor. Shares of RWAY Common Stock have no preemptive, conversion or redemption rights and are freely transferable, except where their transfer is restricted by federal and state securities laws or by contract. In the event of RWAY’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each share of RWAY Common Stock would be entitled to share ratably in all of RWAY’s assets that are legally available for distribution after RWAY pays all debts and other liabilities and subject to any preferential rights of holders of RWAY preferred stock, if any preferred stock is outstanding at such time. Each share of RWAY Common Stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of directors. Except as provided with respect to any other class or series of stock, the holders of RWAY Common Stock will possess exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock can elect all of RWAY directors, and holders of less than a majority of such shares will be unable to elect any director.
Limitation on Liability of Directors and Officers; Indemnification and Advance of Expenses
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action. Our charter contains such a provision which eliminates directors’ and officers’ liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, subject to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).
RWAY’s charter authorizes us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while serving as a RWAY director or officer and at RWAY’s request, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner, trustee, member or manager from and against any claim or liability to which that person may become subject or which that person may incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and to pay or reimburse their reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. RWAY’s bylaws obligate it, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while serving as a RWAY director or officer and at RWAY’s request, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other
159
Table of Contents
enterprise as a director, officer, partner, trustee, member or manager and who is made, or threatened to be made, a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity from and against any claim or liability to which that person may become subject or which that person may incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and to pay or reimburse his or her reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. The charter and bylaws also permit RWAY to indemnify and advance expenses to any person who served a predecessor of RWAY in any of the capacities described above and any of RWAY’s employees or agents or any employees or agents of RWAY’s predecessor. In accordance with the 1940 Act, RWAY will not indemnify any person for any liability to which such person would be subject by reason of such person’s willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides otherwise, which RWAY’s charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was committed in bad faith or (2) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or (c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly received unless, in either case a court orders indemnification, and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer in advance of final disposition of a proceeding upon the corporation’s receipt of (a) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good-faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the corporation and (b) a written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
RWAY has entered into indemnification agreements with RWAY directors and executive officers. The indemnification agreements provide RWAY directors and executive officers the maximum indemnification permitted under Maryland law and the 1940 Act.
Certain Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and RWAY’s Charter and Bylaws
The MGCL and RWAY’s charter and bylaws contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a potential acquirer to acquire RWAY by means of a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, the material ones of which are discussed below. These provisions are expected to discourage certain coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to negotiate first with the RWAY Board. RWAY expects the benefits of these provisions to outweigh the potential disadvantages of discouraging any such acquisition proposals because, among other things, the negotiation of such proposals may improve their terms.
Classified Board of Directors
The RWAY Board is divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms. Upon expiration of their terms, directors of each class will be elected to serve for three-year terms and until their successors are duly elected and qualify, and each year one class of directors will be elected by the stockholders. A classified RWAY Board may render a change in control of RWAY or removal of our incumbent management more difficult. RWAY believes, however, that the longer time required to elect a majority of a classified RWAY Board will help to ensure the continuity and stability of RWAY’s management and policies.
Election of Directors
RWAY’s bylaws, as authorized by RWAY’s charter, provide that the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote in the election of directors cast at a meeting of stockholders duly called, and at which a quorum is present, will be required to elect a director. Pursuant to RWAY’s charter the RWAY Board may amend the bylaws to alter the vote required to elect directors.
Number of Directors; Vacancies; Removal
RWAY’s charter provides that the number of directors will be set only by the RWAY Board in accordance with RWAY’s bylaws. RWAY’s bylaws provide that a majority of the entire RWAY Board may at any time increase or decrease the number of directors. However, unless RWAY’s bylaws are amended, the number of directors may never be less than one nor more than nine. RWAY’s charter provides that, at such time as RWAY has at least three independent directors and RWAY’s common stock is registered under
160
Table of Contents
the Exchange Act, as amended, RWAY elects to be subject to the provision of Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the MGCL regarding the filling of vacancies on the RWAY Board. Accordingly, at such time, except as may be provided by the RWAY Board in setting the terms of any class or series of preferred stock, any and all vacancies on the RWAY Board may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy will serve for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor is elected and qualifies, subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940 Act.
RWAY’s charter provides that a director may be removed only for cause, as defined in our charter, and then only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors.
Action by Stockholders
Under the MGCL, stockholder action can be taken only at an annual or special meeting of stockholders or (unless the charter provides for stockholder action by less than unanimous written consent, which our charter does not) by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting. These provisions, combined with the requirements of RWAY’s bylaws regarding the calling of a stockholder-requested special meeting of stockholders discussed below, may have the effect of delaying consideration of a stockholder proposal until the next annual meeting.
Advance Notice Provisions for Stockholder Nominations and Stockholder Proposals
RWAY’s bylaws provide that with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, nominations of persons for election to the RWAY Board and the proposal of business to be considered by stockholders may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by or at the direction of the RWAY Board or (3) by a stockholder of RWAY who is a stockholder of record both at the time of giving of notice provided for in RWAY’s bylaws and at the time of the annual meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice provisions of the bylaws. With respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the business specified in our notice of the meeting may be brought before the meeting. Nominations of persons for election to the RWAY Board at a special meeting may be made only (1) by or at the direction of the RWAY Board or (2) provided that the RWAY Board has determined that directors will be elected at the meeting, by a stockholder of RWAY who is a stockholder of record both at the time of giving of notice provided for in RWAY’s bylaws and at the time of the special meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice provisions of the bylaws.
The purpose of requiring stockholders to give RWAY advance notice of nominations and other business is to afford the RWAY Board a meaningful opportunity to consider the qualifications of the proposed nominees and the advisability of any other proposed business and, to the extent deemed necessary or desirable by the RWAY Board, to inform stockholders and make recommendations about such qualifications or business, as well as to provide a more orderly procedure for conducting meetings of stockholders. Although RWAY’s bylaws do not give the RWAY Board any power to disapprove stockholder nominations for the election of directors or proposals recommending certain action, they may have the effect of precluding a contest for the election of directors or the consideration of stockholder proposals if proper procedures are not followed and of discouraging or deterring a third party from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of directors or to approve its own proposal without regard to whether consideration of such nominees or proposals might be harmful or beneficial to RWAY and its stockholders.
Calling of Special Meetings of Stockholders
RWAY’s bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called by the RWAY Board and certain of its officers. Additionally, RWAY’s bylaws provide that, subject to the satisfaction of certain procedural and informational requirements by the stockholders requesting the meeting, a special meeting of stockholders will be called by the secretary of the corporation upon the written request of stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at such meeting.
Approval of Extraordinary Corporate Action; Amendment of Charter and Bylaws
Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business, unless approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. RWAY’s charter generally provides for approval of charter amendments and extraordinary transactions by the stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. RWAY’s charter also provides that certain charter amendments, any proposal for RWAY’s conversion, whether by charter amendment, merger or otherwise, from a closed-end company to an open-end company and any proposal for our liquidation or dissolution requires the approval of the stockholders entitled to cast at least 80% of the votes entitled to be cast on such matter. However, if such amendment or proposal is approved by a majority
161
Table of Contents
of our continuing directors (in addition to approval by the RWAY Board), such amendment or proposal may be approved by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on such a matter. The “continuing directors” are defined in RWAY’s charter as (1) RWAY’s current directors, (2) those directors whose nomination for election by the stockholders or whose election by the directors to fill vacancies is approved by a majority of our current directors then on the RWAY Board or (3) any successor directors whose nomination for election by the stockholders or whose election by the directors to fill vacancies is approved by a majority of continuing directors or the successor continuing directors then in office.
RWAY’s charter and bylaws provide that the RWAY Board will have the exclusive power to make, alter, amend or repeal any provision of RWAY’s bylaws.
No Appraisal Rights
Except with respect to appraisal rights arising in connection with the Control Share Act discussed below, as permitted by the MGCL, RWAY’s charter provides that stockholders will not be entitled to exercise appraisal rights unless a majority of the RWAY Board shall determine such rights apply.
Control Share Acquisitions
The MGCL provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter (the “Control Share Act”). Shares owned by the acquirer, by officers or by directors who are employees of the corporation are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the matter. Control shares are voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquirer or in respect of which the acquirer is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:
The requisite stockholder approval must be obtained each time an acquirer crosses one of the thresholds of voting power set forth above. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A control share acquisition means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition may compel the Board of Directors of the corporation to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of the shares. The right to compel the calling of a special meeting is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including an undertaking to pay the expenses of the meeting. If no request for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the question at any stockholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement as required by the statute, then the corporation may redeem for fair value any or all of the control shares, except those for which voting rights have previously been approved. The right of the corporation to redeem control shares is subject to certain conditions and limitations, including, as provided in RWAY’s bylaws compliance with the 1940 Act. Fair value is determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares, as of the date of the last control share acquisition by the acquirer or of any meeting of stockholders at which the voting rights of the shares are considered and not approved. If voting rights for control shares are approved at a stockholders meeting and the acquirer becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for purposes of appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per share paid by the acquirer in the control share acquisition.
The Control Share Act does not apply (a) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction or (b) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the corporation. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares of stock. There can be no assurance that such provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future. However, we will amend RWAY’s bylaws to be subject to the Control Share Act only if the Board of Directors determines that it would be in RWAY’s best interests and if the SEC staff does not object to RWAY’s determination that RWAY’s being subject to the Control Share Act does not conflict with the 1940 Act.
Business Combinations
162
Table of Contents
Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder (the “Business Combination Act”). These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
A person is not an interested stockholder under this statute if the RWAY Board approved in advance the transaction by which the stockholder otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, the RWAY Board may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the RWAY Board.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination between the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the RWAY Board of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation’s common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares.
The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the RWAY Board before the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. The RWAY Board has adopted a resolution that any business combination between RWAY and any other person is exempted from the provisions of the Business Combination Act, provided that the business combination is first approved by the Board of Directors, including a majority of the directors who are not “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act. This resolution may be altered or repealed in whole or in part at any time; however, the RWAY Board will adopt resolutions so as to make RWAY subject to the provisions of the Business Combination Act only if the RWAY Board determines that it would be in RWAY’s best interests and if the SEC staff does not object to RWAY’s determination that RWAY being subject to the Business Combination Act does not conflict with the 1940 Act. If this resolution is repealed, or the RWAY Board does not otherwise approve a business combination, the statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of RWAY and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Conflict with 1940 Act
RWAY’s bylaws provide that, if and to the extent that any provision of the MGCL, including the Control Share Act (if we amend RWAY’s bylaws to be subject to such Act) and the Business Combination Act, or any provision of RWAY’s charter or bylaws conflicts with any provision of the 1940 Act, the applicable provision of the 1940 Act will control.
163
Table of Contents
Exclusive Forum
RWAY’s charter and bylaws provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, unless RWAY consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of RWAY, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of RWAY to RWAY or RWAY’s stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the MGCL, the charter or bylaws or the securities, antifraud, unfair trade practices or similar laws of any international, national, state, provincial, territorial, local or other governmental or regulatory authority, including, in each case, the applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine shall be a federal or state court located in the state of Delaware, provided that to the extent the appropriate court located in the state of Delaware determines that it does not have jurisdiction over such action, then the sole and exclusive forum shall be any federal or state court located in the state of Maryland. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of capital stock of RWAY shall be deemed, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to have notice of and consented to these exclusive forum provisions and to have irrevocably submitted to, and waived any objection to, the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in connection with any such action or proceeding and consented to process being served in any such action or proceeding, without limitation, by United States mail addressed to the stockholder at the stockholder’s address as it appears on the records of RWAY, with postage thereon prepaid.
164
Table of Contents
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF SWK
The following is a summary of the material terms of SWK’s capital stock. This summary does not purport to be exhaustive and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our certificate of incorporation (the “SWK Charter”), as amended, and bylaws (the “SWK Bylaws”) and to the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Copies of the SWK Charter, as amended, and The SWK Bylaws have been filed with the SEC.
SWK’s authorized capital stock consists of 255,000,000 shares. The authorized capital stock is divided into 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 250,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of February 27, 2026, SWK had 12,095,906 shares of common stock outstanding and no preferred stock was outstanding. Each share of SWK Common Stock has the same relative rights as, and is identical in all respects with, each other share of common stock. Set forth below is a chart describing the classes of SWK securities outstanding as of February 27, 2026:
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
Title of Class |
|
Amount Authorized |
|
Amount Held by SWK or for its Account |
|
Amount Outstanding Exclusive of Amount Shown Under (3) |
Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
250,000,000 |
|
53 |
|
12,095,906 |
Preferred Stock |
|
5,000,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
Common Stock
Holders of SWK Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders and do not have cumulative voting rights. Thus, holders of a majority of SWK Common Stock entitled to vote in any election of SWK’s directors may elect all of the directors standing for election. Holders of SWK Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably any dividends that may be declared by SWK’s Board out of funds legally available for dividends, subject to any preferential dividend rights of outstanding SWK Preferred Stock. If SWK liquidates, dissolves or winds up, the holders of SWK Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably all of SWK’s assets available after payment of all debts and other liabilities, subject to the prior rights of any outstanding SWK Preferred Stock. Holders of SWK Common Stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights or any rights to share in any sinking fund. The rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of SWK Common Stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any outstanding SWK Preferred Stock.
Preferred Stock
The SWK Charter authorizes the issuance of SWK Preferred Stock from time to time in one or more series with rights and privileges that might be senior to SWK Common Stock, without the consent of holders of the common stock. The SWK Charter also authorizes the SWK Board to fix the powers, rights, designations, preferences, qualifications, limitations and restrictions, and dividend, voting and conversion rights pertaining to each series of preferred stock that SWK issues. The issuance of SWK Preferred Stock with voting and other rights may adversely affect the voting power of the holders of SWK Common Stock and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control.
Stockholders’ Agreement
SWK is party to a Stockholders’ Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2014, with Double Black Diamond Offshore Ltd. and Black Diamond Offshore Ltd., investment funds managed by Carlson Capital, L.P. (together, the “Carlson Funds”), that together beneficially own approximately 70.21% of SWK’s outstanding common stock. Pursuant to the Stockholders’ Agreement, SWK granted the Carlson Funds, until the Carlson Funds and their affiliates own less than 40 percent of the voting power of the outstanding voting securities of SWK (an “Ownership Reduction Event”), approval rights with respect to certain transactions including (i) the incurrence of indebtedness over specified amounts, (ii) the offer or sale of new equity or equity-based securities, (iii) the repurchase or redemption of equity securities, (iv) the sale or purchase of assets over specified amounts, (v) the declaration of dividends, (vi) making any loans, capital contributions to or investments in any person over specified amounts, (vii) making any changes in the size of SWK’s Board or (v) terminating or hiring a replacement for SWK’s Chief Executive Officer.
Also under the Stockholders’ Agreement, the Carlson Funds agreed that until the earlier of August 18, 2022 or such time as the Ownership Reduction Event: (i) the Carlson Funds would not engage in a going-private transaction as described in Rule 13e-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, without offering to acquire all of the then-outstanding common stock on the same terms and conditions and would not engage in such a transaction without the approval of both (x) a special committee of directors that are not affiliates of the Carlson Funds or SWK (“Non-Affiliated Directors”) and (y) the holders of a majority of the common stock held
165
Table of Contents
by stockholders of SWK other than the Carlson Funds; (ii) SWK would maintain at least two Non-Affiliated Directors; and (iii) any related party transaction or deregistration of our common stock from SEC reporting requirements would require the approval of a committee of such Non-Affiliated Directors or a subset thereof. We refer to these provisions as the “Minority Protections.”
On June 28, 2022, SWK and the Carlson Funds entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Stockholders’ Agreement (the “Stockholders’ Agreement Amendment”). The Stockholders’ Agreement Amendment extends the Minority Protections until an Ownership Reduction Event and deletes the provision of the Stockholder’s Agreement that would terminate the Minority Protections as of August 18, 2022.
In connection with the Stockholders’ Agreement Amendment, SWK and Carlson agreed on proposed revisions to the SWK Charter and the SWK Bylaws to, among other things, permit stockholders that own at least 15 percent of SWK’s outstanding shares to call a special meeting of stockholders.
The Stockholders’ Agreement Amendment also, for so long as the Carlson Funds and their affiliates own at least 15 percent of SWK’s outstanding voting securities, (i) exempts the Carlson Funds from certain of the proposed bylaw requirements for calling a special meeting and certain of the requirements of proposed advance notice provisions and (ii) provides that, without the approval of the Carlson Funds, SWK and SWK’s Board would not amend the proposed bylaw provisions relating to special meetings in a manner adverse to the Carlson Funds.
On March 2, 2023, SWK and the Carlson Funds entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Stockholders’ Agreement (the “Stockholders’ Agreement Amendment No. 2”). The Stockholders’ Agreement Amendment No. 2 deletes the provision of the Stockholder’s Agreement that grants approval rights to the Carlson Funds with respect to terminating or hiring a replacement for SWK’s Chief Executive Officer.
The foregoing descriptions of the Stockholders’ Agreement, Stockholders’ Agreement Amendment and the Stockholders’ Agreement Amendment No. 2 are not complete and are qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such agreement filed with the SEC on Form 8-K on August 19, 2014, Form 8-K on June 28, 2022 and Form 10-K on March 31, 2023, respectively.
Anti-Takeover Provisions
Section 203 of the DGCL provides that, subject to certain exceptions specified therein, an “interested stockholder” of a Delaware corporation may not engage in any business combination with the corporation for a three-year period following the time that such stockholder becomes an “interested stockholder” unless (1) prior to such time, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an “interested stockholder,” (2) upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an “interested stockholder,” the interested stockholder owned at least 85 percent of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced (excluding certain shares), or (3) at or subsequent to such time, the business combination is approved by the board of directors of the corporation and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders. Under certain circumstances, Section 203 makes it more difficult for a person who would be an “interested stockholder” to effect various business combinations with a corporation for a three-year period, although the stockholders may elect to exclude a corporation from the restrictions imposed thereunder. SWK’s certificate of incorporation does not exclude SWK from the restrictions imposed under Section 203. The provisions of Section 203 may encourage companies interested in acquiring SWK to negotiate in advance with the SWK Board, since the stockholder approval requirement would be avoided if a majority of the directors then in office approve either the business combination or the transaction which results in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder. These provisions also may have the effect of preventing changes in SWK’s management. It is possible that such provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish transactions which stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for SWK Common Stock is Computershare Trust Company, N.A., and its telephone number is 1-800-962-4284.
Nasdaq Capital Market
SWK Common Stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “SWKH.”
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN OF RWAY
166
Table of Contents
The information in “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 9. Net Assets” in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements of RWAY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 814-01180) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 is incorporated herein by reference.
167
Table of Contents
COMPARISON OF RWAY AND SWK STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS
The following table is a summary of certain material differences among the rights of RWAY Stockholders and SWK Stockholders. The following discussion is not intended to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to RWAY’s charter (the “RWAY Charter”), the RWAY Bylaws, the SWK Charter, the SWK Bylaws, the MGCL and the DGCL. These documents are incorporated by reference in this registration statement and will be sent to RWAY Stockholders and SWK Stockholders upon request. See the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.”
As set forth in greater detail above in the section entitled “Description of the Merger Agreement,” SWK Stockholders will receive shares of RWAY Common Stock in the Mergers.
|
Rights of RWAY Stockholders |
Rights of SWK Stockholders |
Authorized Stock |
RWAY’s authorized stock consists of 100,000,000 shares, par value $0.01 per share, all of which initially designed as common stock. Under the RWAY Charter, the RWAY Board is authorized to classify and reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other classes or series of stock without obtaining stockholder approval. As permitted by the MGCL, the RWAY Charter provides that the RWAY Board, without any action by stockholders, may amend the charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that RWAY has authority to issue. |
SWK’s authorized capital stock consists of 255,000,000 shares. The authorized capital stock is divided into 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 250,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The number of authorized shares of SWK Common Stock or preferred stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of capital stock of SWK entitled to vote thereon, without a vote of the holders of any class or series of stock, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to the terms of any series of preferred stock.
|
168
Table of Contents
|
Rights of RWAY Stockholders |
Rights of SWK Stockholders |
Common Stock |
As of February 27, 2026, there were 36,134,037 shares of RWAY Common Stock issued and outstanding.
|
As of February 27, 2026, there were 12,095,959 shares of SWK Common Stock issued, of which 12,095,906 shares are outstanding. The difference is due to 53 shares of Treasury Stock. |
Preferred Stock |
As of February 27, 2026, RWAY has issued no Preferred Stock. The RWAY Board may classify any unissued shares of stock and reclassify any previously classified but unissued shares of stock of any class or series from time to time, into one or more classes or series of stock, including preferred stock. |
As of February 27, 2026, no shares of preferred stock were issued or outstanding. The SWK Charter authorizes the issuance of preferred stock from time to time in one or more series with rights and privileges that might be senior to the SWK Common Stock, without the consent of SWK Stockholders. The certificate also authorizes the SWK Board to fix the powers, rights, designations, preferences, qualifications, limitations and restrictions, and dividend, voting and conversion rights pertaining to each series of preferred stock that SWK issues. The issuance of preferred stock with voting and other rights may adversely affect the voting power of the holders of SWK Common Stock and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control.
|
Voting Rights |
Each share of RWAY Common Stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of RWAY Stockholders, including the election of directors. Except as provided with respect to any other class or series of stock, RWAY Stockholders will possess exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of RWAY Common Stock can elect all directors, and holders of less than a majority of such shares will be unable to elect any director.
|
SWK Stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of SWK Stockholders and do not have cumulative voting rights. Thus, holders of a majority of the shares of SWK Common Stock entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all of the directors standing for election. |
Amendment of Bylaws |
The RWAY Board shall have the exclusive power, at any time, to adopt, alter or repeal any provision of the RWAY Bylaws and to make new bylaws. |
The SWK Board is expressly authorized to make, repeal, alter, amend and rescind any or all of the SWK Bylaws. In addition, the SWK Bylaws may be amended by the affirmative vote of holders of at least sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the outstanding shares of voting stock of SWK entitled to vote thereon.
|
Inspection of Books & Records |
Under the MGCL, any RWAY Stockholder may inspect and copy during usual business hours, the RWAY Bylaws, the minutes of the proceedings of the RWAY Stockholders, annual statements of affairs and voting trust agreements deposited with RWAY at its |
Under the DGCL, SWK Stockholders are permitted to examine and make extracts from SWK’s books and records for a proper purpose. Under the DGCL, a SWK Stockholder seeking to inspect the books and records of SWK must: (1) make a demand in writing |
169
Table of Contents
|
Rights of RWAY Stockholders |
Rights of SWK Stockholders |
|
principal office. In addition, one or more persons who together are and for at least six months have been stockholders of record of at least five percent of the outstanding shares of stock of any class of RWAY may inspect and copy during usual business hours RWAY’s books of account and its stock ledger and, if RWAY does not maintain the original or a duplicate stock ledger at its principal office, present to any officer of RWAY a written request for a list of RWAY Stockholders. However, the RWAY Charter provides that a stockholder that is otherwise eligible under applicable law to inspect RWAY’s books of account, stock ledger, or other specified documents of RWAY shall have no right to make such inspection if the RWAY Board determines that such stockholder has an improper purpose for requesting such inspection.
|
and under oath stating a proper purpose for such inspection and (2) the stated purpose be reasonably related to such person’s interest as a SWK Stockholder. If SWK refused to permit the inspection or does not reply to the demand within five business days after the demand has been made, the SWK Stockholder may apply to the Court of Chancery for an order to compel inspection. |
Appraisal Rights |
No holder of stock of RWAY shall be entitled to exercise the rights of an objecting stockholder under Title 3, Subtitle 2 of the MGCL or any successor provision thereto unless the RWAY Board, upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the entire RWAY Board, shall determine that such rights apply, with respect to all or any classes or series of stock, or any proportion of the shares thereof, to a particular transaction or all transactions occurring after the date of such determination in connection with which holders of such shares would otherwise be entitled to exercise such rights.
|
The DGCL provides that SWK Stockholders have appraisal rights with respect to certain transactions such as certain mergers, consolidations, conversions and domestications. |
Number of Directors |
At any regular meeting or at any special meeting called for that purpose, a majority of the entire RWAY Board may establish, increase or decrease the number of directors, provided that the number thereof shall never be less than one, nor more than nine, and further provided that the tenure of office of a director shall not be affected by any decrease in the number of directors.
|
Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock to elect additional directors under specified circumstances, the number of directors of SWK shall be determined by resolution of the SWK Board. |
Independent Directors |
A majority of the RWAY Board must be independent directors under NASDAQ rules.
|
A majority of the SWK Board must be independent directors under NASDAQ rules. |
170
Table of Contents
|
Rights of RWAY Stockholders |
Rights of SWK Stockholders |
Classes of Directors and Terms |
The RWAY Board is divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms. Upon expiration of their terms, directors of each class will be elected to serve for three-year terms and until their successors are duly elected and qualify, and each year one class of directors will be elected by the RWAY Stockholders. |
The SWK Board is not divided into classes. The directors, other than those who may be elected by the holders of any series of preferred stock under specified circumstances, shall serve for a term expiring at the annual meeting of SWK Stockholders following their election or appointment, with each such director to hold office until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office. No decrease in the number of directors constituting the SWK Board shall shorten the term of any incumbent director.
|
Director Vacancies |
Any vacancy on the RWAY Board may be filled only by a majority of the remaining directors, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy shall serve for the remainder of the full term of the class in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor is elected and qualifies. |
Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock then outstanding, any vacancies in the SWK Board resulting from death, resignation, disqualification, removal from office or other cause may be filled by a majority vote of the directors then in office, though less than a quorum, and directors so chosen shall serve for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders. No decrease in the authorized number of directors shall shorten the term of any incumbent director.
|
Removal of Directors |
A director may be removed only for cause, as defined in the RWAY Charter, and then only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors. |
Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock, any director may be removed from office at any time, with or without cause, in each case by the affirmative vote of 66 2/3% of the outstanding shares of voting stock of SWK entitled to vote at an election of directors.
|
Director Elections |
Directors will be elected by a plurality vote of the RWAY Stockholders. |
Except as otherwise required by any certificate of designations relating to any series of preferred stock, all elections shall be determined by a plurality of the votes cast.
|
Extraordinary Actions |
Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business, unless approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than |
Under the DGCL, generally, a merger, consolidation, conversion, sale of all or substantially all of a corporation’s assets (other than a sale to a wholly owned subsidiary) or dissolution must be approved by the corporation’s board of directors and the holders of a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares entitled to vote unless the certificate of incorporation provides for a higher voting standard. |
171
Table of Contents
|
Rights of RWAY Stockholders |
Rights of SWK Stockholders |
|
a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.
|
|
Preemptive Rights |
Shares of RWAY Common Stock have no preemptive, conversion or redemption rights and are freely transferable, except where their transfer is restricted by federal and state securities laws or by contract. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each share of common stock would be entitled to share ratably in all of RWAY’s assets that are legally available for distribution after paying all debts and other liabilities and subject to any preferential rights of holders of preferred stock, if any preferred stock is outstanding at such time.
|
SWK Stockholders have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights or any rights to share in any sinking fund. The rights, preferences and privileges of the SWK Stockholders are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any of our outstanding preferred stock. |
Limitation of Liability |
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action. The RWAY Charter contains such a provision which eliminates directors’ and officers’ liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, subject to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
|
Directors of SWK are entitled to the benefits of limitations on liability under the DGCL. Directors are not liable to SWK or SWK Stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty, except for specific circumstances such as breach of duty of loyalty, acts or omissions made in bad faith or involving intentional misconduct or knowing violation of law, liability under Section 174 of the DGCL, or transactions from which the director received an improper personal benefit. |
Indemnity |
RWAY’s charter authorizes, and its Bylaws obligate indemnification for directors, officers, and other persons to which Maryland law permits. RWAY has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and executive officers. The indemnification agreements provide the directors and executive officers the maximum indemnification permitted under Maryland law and the 1940 Act. |
The SWK Charter provides for indemnification and advancement of expenses for directors, officers, employees and agents (and any other persons to which Delaware law permits SWK to provide indemnification) through the SWK Bylaw provisions, agreements with such agents or other persons, vote of SWK Stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, in excess of the indemnification and advancement otherwise permitted by Section 145 of the DGCL, subject only to limits created by applicable Delaware law (statutory or non-statutory), with respect to action for breach of duty to SWK, SWK Stockholders, and others.
|
172
Table of Contents
|
Rights of RWAY Stockholders |
Rights of SWK Stockholders |
Action by Written Consent of Stockholders |
Under the MGCL, stockholder action can be taken only at an annual or special meeting of stockholders or (unless the charter provides for stockholder action by less than unanimous written consent, which the RWAY Charter does not) by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting.
|
Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock, stockholders of SWK shall take action by meeting and shall have no right to take any action by written consent without a meeting. |
Special Meetings of Stockholders |
The chairman of the RWAY Board, the chief executive officer, the president, or the RWAY Board may call a special meeting of RWAY Stockholders. Subject to subsection (b) of Article II, Section 3 of the RWAY Bylaws, the secretary of RWAY may also call a special meeting of the stockholders upon the written request of stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at such meeting. |
Subject to the terms of any class or series of preferred stock, special meetings of SWK Stockholders may be called by the SWK Board or the chairperson of the SWK Board and shall be called by the secretary of SWK following the secretary’s receipt of signed written requests to call a meeting from the holders of at least 15% of the voting power of the outstanding capital stock of SWK in accordance with Section 2 of Article I of the SWK Bylaws. Except as otherwise required by law or provided by the terms of any class or series of preferred stock, special meetings of stockholders of SWK may not be called by any other person or persons.
|
Business Combinations |
Under the Maryland Business Combination Act (the “MBCA”), certain “business combinations” (including a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or, in certain circumstances, an asset transfer or issuance of reclassification of equity securities) between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock or an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding stock of the corporation) or an affiliate of such an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder and thereafter the MBCA imposes two supermajority stockholder voting requirements on these combinations, unless, among other conditions, RWAY common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined in the MGCL, for their shares and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares of stock. The RWAY Board has adopted a resolution providing that any business combination between RWAY and any other person is exempted from the foregoing provisions, provided that the business combination is first approved by the RWAY Board, including a |
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that, subject to certain exceptions specified therein, an “interested stockholder” of a Delaware corporation may not engage in any business combination with the corporation for a three-year period following the time that such stockholder becomes an “interested stockholder” unless (1) prior to such time, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an “interested stockholder,” (2) upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an “interested stockholder,” the interested stockholder owned at least 85 percent of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced (excluding certain shares), or (3) at or subsequent to such time, the business combination is approved by the board of directors of the corporation and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders. Under certain circumstances, Section 203 makes it more difficult for a person who would be an “interested stockholder” to effect various business combinations with a corporation for a three-year period, although the stockholders may elect to exclude a corporation from the restrictions imposed thereunder. The SWK Charter does not exclude it from the restrictions imposed under Section 203. The provisions of Section 203 may encourage companies |
173
Table of Contents
|
Rights of RWAY Stockholders |
Rights of SWK Stockholders |
|
majority of the directors who are not “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act. This resolution may be altered or repealed in whole or in part at any time. |
interested in acquiring SWK to negotiate in advance with the SWK Board, since the stockholder approval requirement would be avoided if a majority of the directors then in office approve either the business combination or the transaction which results in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder. |
Approval of Certain Charter Amendments |
RWAY’s charter generally provides for approval of charter amendments and extraordinary transactions by the stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. The charter also provides that certain charter amendments, any proposal for our conversion, whether by charter amendment, merger or otherwise, from a closed-end company to an open-end company and any proposal for liquidation or dissolution requires the approval of the stockholders entitled to cast at least 80% of the votes entitled to be cast on such matter. However, if such amendment or proposal is approved by a majority of continuing directors (in addition to approval by the RWAY Board), such amendment or proposal may be approved by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on such a matter. The “continuing directors” are defined in RWAY’s charter as (1) the current directors, (2) those directors whose nomination for election by the stockholders or whose election by the directors to fill vacancies is approved by a majority of our current directors then on the RWAY Board or (3) any successor directors whose nomination for election by the stockholders or whose election by the directors to fill vacancies is approved by a majority of continuing directors or the successor continuing directors then in office.
|
SWK reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in the SWK Charter, and all rights conferred upon SWK Stockholders are granted subject to this reservation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions set forth in Articles V, VI, VII, VIII and IX of the SWK Charter may not be repealed or amended in any respect without the affirmative vote of holders of at least 66-2/3% of the outstanding voting stock of SWK entitled to vote thereon. |
Control Share Acquisitions |
The MGCL provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter (the “Control Share Act”). Shares owned by the acquirer, by officers or by directors who are employees of the corporation are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the matter. Control shares are voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquirer or in respect of which the acquirer is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting power: one-tenth or more but less than one-third; one-third or more but less than a majority; or a majority or more of all voting power. |
The DGCL does not contain a statute comparable to the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. |
174
Table of Contents
|
Rights of RWAY Stockholders |
Rights of SWK Stockholders |
|
The requisite stockholder approval must be obtained each time an acquirer crosses one of the thresholds of voting power set forth above. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A control share acquisition means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions. The Control Share Act does not apply (a) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction or (b) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the corporation. The RWAY Bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Act any and all acquisitions by any person of RWAY Common Stock. |
|
175
Table of Contents
CUSTODIAN, TRANSFER AND DISTRIBUTION PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR
RWAY’s securities and loan documents are held by U.S. Bank, National Association, pursuant to a custodian agreement. The principal business address of U.S. Bank, National Association, is 190 S. LaSalle Street, 8th Floor, Chicago, IL 60603. American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC will serve as RWAY’s transfer agent, distribution paying agent and registrar. The principal business address of American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC is 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11219.
BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
Since RWAY will acquire and dispose of many of its investments in privately negotiated transactions, many of the transactions that RWAY engages in will not require the use of brokers or the payment of brokerage commissions. Subject to policies established by the RWAY Board, the Adviser will be primarily responsible for selecting brokers and dealers to execute transactions with respect to the publicly traded securities portion of its portfolio transactions and the allocation of brokerage commissions. The Adviser does not expect to execute transactions through any particular broker or dealer but will seek to obtain the best net results for RWAY under the circumstances, taking into account such factors as price (including the applicable brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of order, difficulty of execution and operational facilities of the firm and the firm’s risk and skill in positioning blocks of securities. The Adviser generally will seek reasonably competitive trade execution costs but will not necessarily pay the lowest spread or commission available. Subject to applicable legal requirements and consistent with Section 28(e) of the 1934 Act, the Adviser may select a broker based upon brokerage or research services provided to the Adviser and RWAY and any other clients. In return for such services, RWAY may pay a higher commission than other brokers would charge if the Adviser determines in good faith that such commission is reasonable in relation to the services provided.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the common stock offered hereby and certain legal matters for us in connection with the offering will be passed upon for us by Dechert LLP (“Dechert”). Dechert also represents the Adviser.
176
Table of Contents
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS
The consolidated financial statements of Runway Growth Finance Corp. as of December 31, 2023 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2023 incorporated in this proxy statement/prospectus by reference from the Runway Growth Finance Corp. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, as modified by the Runway Growth Finance Corp. Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2024, has been audited by RSM US LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report thereon, incorporated herein by reference, and have been incorporated in this prospectus and Registration Statement in reliance upon such report and upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing. The address of RSM US LLP is 30 South Wacker Drive, Suite 3300, Chicago, IL 60606.
The consolidated financial statements, financial highlights, and senior securities table of Runway Growth Finance Corp. as of December 31, 2024 incorporated in this proxy statement/prospectus by reference from the Runway Growth Finance Corp. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, as modified by the Runway Growth Finance Corp. Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2024, has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report thereon, incorporated herein by reference, and have been incorporated in this prospectus and Registration Statement in reliance upon such report and upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing. The address of Deloitte & Touche LLP is 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10112.
The consolidated financial statements of SWK Holdings Corporation as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2024 are incorporated herein by reference to the SWK Holdings Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 and have been so incorporated in reliance on the report of BPM LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of such firm as experts in auditing and accounting. The address of BPM LLP is One California Street, Suite 2500, San Francisco, CA 94111.
OTHER MATTERS
Other than that set forth in the Notice of Virtual Special Meeting of Stockholders, the SWK Board is not aware of any other matters to be acted upon at the SWK Special Meeting.
177
Table of Contents
STOCKHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS
Please note that only one copy of this proxy statement/prospectus may be delivered to two or more SWK Stockholders who share an address unless SWK has received contrary instructions from one or more of such stockholders. SWK will deliver promptly, upon request, a separate copy of any of these documents to SWK Stockholders at a shared address to which a single copy of such documents was delivered. SWK Stockholders who wish to receive a separate copy of any of these documents, or to receive a single copy of such documents if multiple copies were delivered, now or in the future, should submit their request by calling SWK at (972) 687-7252 or by writing to SWK Holdings Corporation, 5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 650, Dallas, TX 75225.
FUTURE SWK STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
If the First Merger is consummated, SWK will have no public stockholders and there will be no public participation in any future meetings of SWK Stockholders. However, if the First Merger is not consummated, SWK Stockholders will continue to be entitled to attend and participate in meetings of SWK Stockholders.
SWK intends to hold an annual meeting of stockholders in 2026 only if the First Merger is not consummated.
Stockholder Proposals for Inclusion in the Proxy Statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting:
Under the rules of the SEC, if an SWK Stockholder wants to include a proposal in SWK’s proxy statement and form of proxy for presentation at SWK’s 2026 annual meeting of stockholders (pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act), the proposal must be received by SWK at its principal executive offices by the close of business on December 20, 2025; provided, however, that if the date of the 2026 annual meeting is more than thirty (30) days from the date of the 2025 annual meeting, the proposal must be received by SWK by the deadline publicly disclosed by SWK subsequent to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. As the rules of the SEC make clear, simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee that it will be included.
Under the SWK Bylaws, to be timely, any stockholder director nomination or proposal of other business intended to be presented for consideration at the 2026 annual meeting, but not intended to be considered for inclusion in SWK’s proxy statement and form of proxy relating to such meeting (i.e., not pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act), must be received by SWK at its principal executive offices not later than the close of business on March 15, 2026 nor earlier than the close of business on February 13, 2026; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the 2026 annual meeting is more than thirty (30) days before or more than thirty (30) days after the first anniversary of the 2025 annual meeting, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Any such nomination must also comply with Rule 14a-19 of the Exchange Act of 1934, including the notice period set forth in Rule 14a-19(b) set forth therein.
The above-mentioned proposals must also be in compliance with the SWK Bylaws and the proxy solicitation rules of the SEC, including but not limited to the information requirements set forth in the SWK Bylaws as then in effect. SWK reserves the right to reject, rule out of order or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with the foregoing and other applicable requirements.
178
Table of Contents
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
RWAY has filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form N-14 (of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part), together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the Securities Act. The registration statement contains additional information about RWAY and the securities being offered by this document.
Each of RWAY and SWK files with or submits to the SEC annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information meeting the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. The SEC maintains an Internet site at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically by each of RWAY and SWK with the SEC. Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and other information can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. Copies of such material can also be obtained from the Public Reference Branch, Office of Consumer Affairs and Information Services, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates, or may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov.
RWAY maintains a website at https://investors.runwaygrowth.com/ and makes all of its annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other publicly filed information available, free of charge, on or through its website. Except for documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement, information contained on such website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. You may also request a copy of these filings (other than exhibits, unless the exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference into these documents) at no cost by writing, emailing or calling Investor Relations department at the following address and telephone number:
Runway Growth Finance Corp.
205 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 4200
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 698‑6902
SWK maintains a website at https://www.swkhold.com/ and makes all of its annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other publicly filed information available, free of charge, on or through its website. Except for documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement, information contained on such website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. You may also request a copy of these filings (other than exhibits, unless the exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference into these documents) at no cost by writing, emailing or calling Investor Relations department at the following address and telephone number:
SWK Holdings Corporation
5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 650
Dallas, TX 75225
(972) 687-7252
179
Table of Contents
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE FOR RWAY
This proxy statement/prospectus is part of a registration statement that RWAY has filed with the SEC. RWAY is allowed to “incorporate by reference” the information that it files with the SEC, which means RWAY can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this proxy statement/prospectus.
This proxy statement/prospectus and any prospectus supplement incorporate by reference the documents set forth below that have previously been filed with the SEC:
To obtain copies of these filings, see the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.”
You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. No one has been authorized to provide you with information that is different from that contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement/prospectus. This proxy statement/prospectus is dated March 3, 2026. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other than that date. You should not assume that the information incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date of such incorporated document. The mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus to SWK Stockholders will not create any implication to the contrary.
This proxy statement/prospectus contains a description of the representations and warranties that each of RWAY and SWK made to the other in the Merger Agreement. Representations and warranties made by each of RWAY and SWK and other applicable parties are also set forth in contracts and other documents (including the Merger Agreement) that are attached or filed as exhibits to this proxy statement/prospectus or are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. These materials are included or incorporated by reference only to provide you with information regarding the terms and conditions of the agreements, and not to provide any other factual information regarding either of RWAY and SWK or their businesses. Accordingly, the representations and warranties and other provisions of the Merger Agreement should not be read alone, but instead should be read only in conjunction with the other information provided elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE FOR SWK
This proxy statement/prospectus is part of a registration statement that SWK has filed with the SEC. SWK is allowed to “incorporate by reference” the information that it files with the SEC, which means SWK can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this proxy statement/prospectus.
This proxy statement/prospectus and any prospectus supplement incorporate by reference the documents set forth below that have previously been filed with the SEC:
180
Table of Contents
To obtain copies of these filings, see the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.”
You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. No one has been authorized to provide you with information that is different from that contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement/prospectus. This proxy statement/prospectus is dated March 3, 2026. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other than that date. You should not assume that the information incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date of such incorporated document. The mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus to RWAY Stockholders or SWK Stockholders will not create any implication to the contrary.
This proxy statement/prospectus contains a description of the representations and warranties that each of RWAY and SWK made to the other in the Merger Agreement. Representations and warranties made by each of RWAY and SWK and other applicable parties are also set forth in contracts and other documents (including the Merger Agreement) that are attached or filed as exhibits to this proxy statement/prospectus or are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. These materials are included or incorporated by reference only to provide you with information regarding the terms and conditions of the agreements, and not to provide any other factual information regarding either of RWAY and SWK or their businesses. Accordingly, the representations and warranties and other provisions of the Merger Agreement should not be read alone, but instead should be read only in conjunction with the other information provided elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
181
Table of Contents
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Indices to RWAY Financial Statements referenced herein:
|
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024: |
|
Page in filing |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (2024) |
|
78 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (2023 and 2022) |
|
79 |
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 |
|
80 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 |
|
81 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 |
|
82 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 |
|
83 |
Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 |
|
84 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
98 |
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2025: |
|
Page in filing |
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of March 31, 2025 (unaudited) and December 31, 2024 |
|
1 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 (unaudited) |
|
2 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 (unaudited) |
|
3 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 (unaudited) |
|
4 |
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of March 31, 2025 (unaudited) |
|
5 |
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2024 |
|
13 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
|
20 |
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended June 30, 2025: |
|
Page in filing |
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of June 30, 2025 (unaudited) and December 31, 2024 |
|
1 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 (unaudited) |
|
2 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 (unaudited) |
|
3 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 (unaudited) |
|
4 |
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of June 30, 2025 (unaudited) |
|
5 |
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2024 |
|
13 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
|
20 |
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended September 30, 2025: |
|
Page in filing |
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of September 30, 2025 (unaudited) and December 31, 2024 |
|
1 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 (unaudited) |
|
2 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 (unaudited) |
|
3 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 (unaudited) |
|
4 |
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of September 30, 2025 (unaudited) |
|
5 |
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2024 |
|
13 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
|
20 |
182
Table of Contents
Indices to SWK Financial Statements referenced herein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024: |
|
Page in filing |
|||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID #207) |
|
32 |
|||
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
34 |
|||
Consolidated Statements of Income |
|
35 |
|||
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity |
|
36 |
|||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|
37 |
|||
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
38 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2025: |
|
Page in filing |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets—March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 |
|
1 |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income—Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 |
|
2 |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity—Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 |
|
3 |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 |
|
4 |
|||
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
5 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended June 30, 2025: |
|
Page in filing |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets—June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 |
|
1 |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income—Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 |
|
2 |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity—Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 |
|
3 |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 |
|
4 |
|||
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
6 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended September 30, 2025: |
|
Page in filing |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets—September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 |
|
1 |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income—Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 |
|
2 |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity—Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 |
|
3 |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 |
|
5 |
|||
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
7 |
|||
183
Table of Contents
Annex A
Executed Version
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
by and among
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.,
RWAY PORTFOLIO HOLDING CORP.,
RWAY PORTFOLIO CORP.,
RUNWAY GROWTH CAPITAL LLC
and
SWK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Dated as of October 9, 2025
A-1
Table of Contents
Article I
THE MERGERS
Section 1.1 |
The Mergers |
2 |
Section 1.2 |
The Closing |
2 |
Section 1.3 |
Effective Time |
3 |
Section 1.4 |
Certificates of Incorporation and Bylaws |
4 |
Section 1.5 |
Board of Directors |
4 |
Section 1.6 |
Officers |
4 |
Section 1.7 |
Alternative Structure |
5 |
Article II
EFFECT OF THE MERGERS ON CAPITAL STOCK; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
Section 2.1 |
Effect on Securities |
5 |
Section 2.2 |
Exchange of Certificates |
8 |
Section 2.3 |
Elections |
11 |
Section 2.4 |
Appraisal Rights |
12 |
Section 2.5 |
Lost Certificates |
13 |
Section 2.6 |
Transfers; No Further Ownership Rights |
13 |
Section 2.7 |
Net Asset Value Calculations |
13 |
Section 2.8 |
Treatment of Equity Awards |
16 |
Article III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
Section 3.1 |
Organization and Qualification |
16 |
Section 3.2 |
Capitalization; Subsidiaries |
16 |
Section 3.3 |
Authority Relative to Agreement; No Conflict |
17 |
Section 3.4 |
Required Filings and Consents |
18 |
Section 3.5 |
Permits; Compliance with Laws |
19 |
Section 3.6 |
Company SEC Documents; Financial Statements; Enforcement Actions |
20 |
Section 3.7 |
Information Supplied |
21 |
Section 3.8 |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
21 |
Section 3.9 |
Absence of Certain Changes or Events |
22 |
Section 3.10 |
No Undisclosed Liabilities |
22 |
Section 3.11 |
Litigation |
22 |
Section 3.12 |
Employee Matters |
22 |
Section 3.13 |
Intellectual Property, Privacy and Data Security. |
24 |
Section 3.14 |
Taxes |
25 |
Section 3.15 |
Material Contracts |
26 |
Section 3.16 |
Real Property |
28 |
Section 3.17 |
Environmental |
29 |
Section 3.18 |
Takeover Statutes |
29 |
Section 3.19 |
Vote Required |
29 |
Section 3.20 |
Brokers and Consultants |
29 |
A-2
Table of Contents
Section 3.21 |
Opinion of Financial Advisor |
30 |
Section 3.22 |
Insurance |
30 |
Section 3.23 |
Investment Assets |
30 |
Section 3.24 |
Assets |
30 |
Section 3.25 |
Share Ownership |
30 |
Section 3.26 |
Compliance with Health Care Laws |
30 |
Section 3.27 |
ERISA. |
31 |
Section 3.28 |
Related Party Transactions. |
32 |
Section 3.29 |
Investment Company Status |
32 |
Section 3.30 |
Acknowledgment of Disclaimer of Other Representations and Warranties |
32 |
Section 3.31 |
No Other Representations or Warranties |
33 |
Article IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT, INTERMEDIARY SUB AND ACQUISITION SUB
Section 4.1 |
Organization and Qualification |
34 |
Section 4.2 |
Capitalization; Subsidiaries |
34 |
Section 4.3 |
Authority Relative to Agreement; No Conflict |
35 |
Section 4.4 |
Required Filings and Consents |
36 |
Section 4.5 |
Permits; Compliance with Laws |
37 |
Section 4.6 |
Parent SEC Documents; Financial Statements; Enforcement Actions |
38 |
Section 4.7 |
Information Supplied |
39 |
Section 4.8 |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
40 |
Section 4.9 |
Absence of Certain Changes or Events |
40 |
Section 4.10 |
No Undisclosed Liabilities |
40 |
Section 4.11 |
Litigation |
40 |
Section 4.12 |
Absence of Certain Agreements |
40 |
Section 4.13 |
Employee Matters |
41 |
Section 4.14 |
Intellectual Property, Privacy and Data Security |
41 |
Section 4.15 |
Taxes |
42 |
Section 4.16 |
Material Contracts |
43 |
Section 4.17 |
Real Property |
44 |
Section 4.18 |
Environmental |
45 |
Section 4.19 |
Takeover Statutes |
45 |
Section 4.20 |
Board Vote |
45 |
Section 4.21 |
No Vote Required |
46 |
Section 4.22 |
Sufficient Funds |
46 |
Section 4.23 |
Assets. |
46 |
Section 4.24 |
Share Ownership |
46 |
Section 4.25 |
Brokers |
47 |
Section 4.26 |
Insurance |
47 |
Section 4.27 |
Solvency |
47 |
Section 4.28 |
Investment Assets |
47 |
Section 4.29 |
Parent Investment Advisory Agreement |
47 |
Section 4.30 |
Acknowledgment of Disclaimer of Other Representations and Warranties |
48 |
A-3
Table of Contents
Section 4.31 |
No Other Representations or Warranties |
49 |
Article V
Parent External Adviser.
Section 5.1 |
Organization and Qualification |
49 |
Section 5.2 |
Authority Relative to Agreement |
49 |
Section 5.3 |
No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents |
50 |
Section 5.4 |
Permits; Compliance with Laws |
50 |
Section 5.5 |
Sufficient Funds |
52 |
Article VI
COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS
Section 6.1 |
Conduct of Business by the Company Pending the Mergers |
52 |
Section 6.2 |
Conduct of Business by Parent Pending the Mergers |
54 |
Section 6.3 |
Preparation of the Form N‑14 and the Proxy Statement; Company Stockholders’ Meeting |
56 |
Section 6.4 |
Appropriate Action; Consents; Filings |
57 |
Section 6.5 |
Access to Information; Confidentiality |
59 |
Section 6.6 |
No Solicitation |
60 |
Section 6.7 |
Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification and Insurance |
64 |
Section 6.8 |
Notification of Certain Matters |
66 |
Section 6.9 |
Public Announcements |
66 |
Section 6.10 |
Acquisition Sub |
67 |
Section 6.11 |
Intermediary Sub |
67 |
Section 6.12 |
No Control of the Other Party’s Business |
67 |
Section 6.13 |
Rule 16b‑3 Matters |
67 |
Section 6.14 |
Stock Exchange Listing |
67 |
Section 6.15 |
Takeover Statutes and Provisions |
68 |
Section 6.16 |
Stockholder Litigation |
68 |
Section 6.17 |
Employee & Benefits Matters. |
68 |
Section 6.18 |
Repayment and Termination of Existing Credit Agreement |
69 |
Section 6.19 |
R&W Policy |
69 |
Section 6.20 |
Lease Termination |
70 |
Section 6.21 |
Tax Returns |
70 |
Section 6.22 |
Preparation and Delivery of Company Audited Financial Statements |
70 |
Article VII
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS
Section 7.1 |
Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party |
71 |
Section 7.2 |
Conditions to Obligations of Parent, Intermediary Sub and Acquisition Sub to Effect the First Merger |
71 |
Section 7.3 |
Conditions to Obligation of the Company to Effect the First Merger |
72 |
Section 7.4 |
Frustration of Closing Conditions |
73 |
A-4
Table of Contents
Article VIII
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
Section 8.1 |
Termination |
73 |
Section 8.2 |
Effect of Termination |
75 |
Section 8.3 |
Termination Fees |
75 |
Section 8.4 |
Amendment |
76 |
Section 8.5 |
Extension; Waiver |
77 |
Section 8.6 |
Expenses; Transfer Taxes |
77 |
Article IX
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 9.1 |
Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements |
77 |
Section 9.2 |
Notices |
77 |
Section 9.3 |
Interpretation; Certain Definitions |
78 |
Section 9.4 |
Severability |
79 |
Section 9.5 |
Assignment |
80 |
Section 9.6 |
Entire Agreement |
80 |
Section 9.7 |
No Third-Party Beneficiaries |
80 |
Section 9.8 |
Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Waiver of Jury Trial |
80 |
Section 9.9 |
Specific Performance |
81 |
Section 9.10 |
Counterparts and Electronic Signature |
81 |
Appendix A |
Definitions |
|
Exhibit A |
Form of Key Stockholder Agreement |
|
Exhibit B |
Calculation of Closing Company Net Asset Value and Closing Parent Net Asset Value |
|
Exhibit C |
Determination of Adjudicated Portfolio Value |
|
A-5
Table of Contents
THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of October 9, 2025 (this “Agreement”), is made by and among Runway Growth Finance Corp. (“Parent”), a Maryland corporation, RWAY Portfolio Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly-owned Subsidiary of Parent (“Intermediary Sub”), RWAY Portfolio Corp., a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly-owned Subsidiary of Intermediary Sub (“Acquisition Sub”), Runway Growth Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Parent External Adviser”) and SWK Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). Defined terms used in this Agreement have the respective meanings ascribed to them by definition in this Agreement or in Appendix A.
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Parent has previously elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”), as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act;
WHEREAS, each of (i) the board of directors of the Company (the “Company Board”) and (ii) the respective boards of directors of Parent (the “Parent Board”), Intermediary Sub and Acquisition Sub has unanimously approved the acquisition of the Company by Parent upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in this Agreement;
WHEREAS, the Company Board, the board of directors of Intermediary Sub and the board of directors of Acquisition Sub have approved and declared advisable, and each of the Parent Board, Parent as the sole stockholder of Intermediary Sub and Intermediary Sub as the sole stockholder of Acquisition Sub has approved or adopted, this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, including the merger of Acquisition Sub with and into the Company (the “First Merger”), with the Company surviving as a wholly-owned Subsidiary of Intermediary Sub (sometimes referred to in such capacity as the “Surviving Corporation”), upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in this Agreement and in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”);
WHEREAS, immediately after the First Merger, the Surviving Corporation shall merge with and into Intermediary Sub (the “Second Merger”), with Intermediary Sub surviving the Second Merger as a wholly-owned Subsidiary of Parent, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in this Agreement and in accordance with the DGCL;
WHEREAS, immediately after the Second Merger, Intermediary Sub shall merge with and into Parent (the “Third Merger” and, together with the First Merger and Second Merger, the “Mergers”), with Parent as the surviving company in the Third Merger, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in this Agreement and in accordance with the DGCL and the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”);
WHEREAS, the Company Board has resolved to recommend that the Company’s stockholders approve and adopt this Agreement;
WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, and as a condition and inducement to Parent’s willingness to enter into this Agreement, the Key Stockholders are entering into the key stockholder agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A (the
1
Table of Contents
“Key Stockholder Agreement”), pursuant to which the Key Stockholders have, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, agreed, among other things, to vote their shares of Company Common Stock in favor of the adoption of this Agreement and the approval of the transactions contemplated hereby including the Mergers; and
WHEREAS, each of Parent, Intermediary Sub, Acquisition Sub, the Parent External Adviser and the Company desires to make certain representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in connection with the Mergers and also to prescribe various conditions to the Mergers.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the representations, warranties and covenants and subject to the conditions herein contained, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
Article I
THE MERGERS
2
Table of Contents
3
Table of Contents
4
Table of Contents
Article II
EFFECT OF THE MERGERS ON CAPITAL STOCK; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
5
Table of Contents
6
Table of Contents
7
Table of Contents
8
Table of Contents
9
Table of Contents
10
Table of Contents
11
Table of Contents
12
Table of Contents
13
Table of Contents
14
Table of Contents
15
Table of Contents
Article III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Documents filed by the Company prior to the date of this Agreement (but excluding any risk factor disclosures contained under the heading “Risk Factors,” any disclosure of risks included in any “forward-looking statements” disclaimer or any other statements that are similarly predictive or forward-looking in nature, in each case, other than any specific factual information contained therein) or as disclosed in the Company Disclosure Letter, the Company hereby represents and warrants to Parent as follows:
16
Table of Contents
17
Table of Contents
18
Table of Contents
19
Table of Contents
20
Table of Contents
21
Table of Contents
22
Table of Contents
23
Table of Contents
24
Table of Contents
25
Table of Contents
26
Table of Contents
27
Table of Contents
28
Table of Contents
29
Table of Contents
30
Table of Contents
31
Table of Contents
32
Table of Contents
33
Table of Contents
Article IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT, INTERMEDIARY SUB AND ACQUISITION SUB
Except as disclosed in the Parent SEC Documents filed by Parent prior to the date of this Agreement (but excluding any risk factor disclosures contained under the heading “Risk Factors,” any disclosure of risks included in any “forward-looking statements” disclaimer or any other statements that are similarly predictive or forward-looking in nature, in each case, other than any specific factual information contained therein) or as disclosed in the Parent Disclosure Letter, Parent, Intermediary Sub and Acquisition Sub hereby jointly and severally represent and warrant to the Company as follows:
34
Table of Contents
35
Table of Contents
36
Table of Contents
37
Table of Contents
38
Table of Contents
39
Table of Contents
40
Table of Contents
41
Table of Contents
42
Table of Contents
43
Table of Contents
44
Table of Contents
45
Table of Contents
46
Table of Contents
47
Table of Contents
48
Table of Contents
Article V
Parent External Adviser.
The Parent External Adviser hereby represents and warrants to the Company as follows:
49
Table of Contents
50
Table of Contents
51
Table of Contents
Article VI
COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS
52
Table of Contents
53
Table of Contents
54
Table of Contents
55
Table of Contents
56
Table of Contents
57
Table of Contents
58
Table of Contents
59
Table of Contents
60
Table of Contents
61
Table of Contents
62
Table of Contents
63
Table of Contents
64
Table of Contents
65
Table of Contents
66
Table of Contents
67
Table of Contents
68
Table of Contents
69
Table of Contents
70
Table of Contents
Article VII
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGERS
71
Table of Contents
72
Table of Contents
Article VIII
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
73
Table of Contents
74
Table of Contents
75
Table of Contents
then, in any such case, the Company shall pay to Parent the Company Termination Fee by wire transfer of same day funds to the account or accounts designated by Parent, in the case of clause (i) above, on the same day as the consummation of such Competing Proposal, in the case of clause (ii) above, concurrently with such termination, and in the case of clause (iii) above, by no later than two (2) Business Days following such termination.
76
Table of Contents
Article ix
GENERAL PROVISIONS
if to Parent, Intermediary Sub, Acquisition Sub or the Parent External Adviser:
Runway Growth Finance Corp.
205 N. Michigan Ave.,
Suite 4200
77
Table of Contents
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Email: [***]
Attention: Thomas Raterman
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
900 G Street NW
Washington, DC 20001
Phone: (202) 636-5500
Email: jonathan.corsico@stblaw.com and steven.grigoriou@stblaw.com
Attention: Jonathan Corsico and Steven Grigoriou
if to the Company:
SWK Holdings Corporation
5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 650
Dallas, TX 75225
Email: [***]
Attention: Joe D. Staggs
with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Goodwin Procter LLP
3025 John F. Kennedy Blvd.
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Phone: (445) 207-7800
Email: RBushey@goodwinlaw.com and LGulick@goodwinlaw.com
Attention: Rachael Bushey and Laura Umbrecht Gulick
or to such other address, electronic mail address or facsimile number for a party as shall be specified in a notice given in accordance with this Section 9.2; provided that any notice received by facsimile transmission or electronic mail or otherwise at the addressee’s location on any Business Day after 5:00 p.m. (addressee’s local time) or on any day that is not a Business Day shall be deemed to have been received at 9:00 a.m. (addressee’s local time) on the next Business Day; provided, further, that notice of any change to the address or any of the other details specified in or pursuant to this Section 9.2 shall not be deemed to have been received until, and shall be deemed to have been received upon, the later of the date specified in such notice or the date that is five (5) Business Days after such notice would otherwise be deemed to have been received pursuant to this Section 9.2.
78
Table of Contents
79
Table of Contents
80
Table of Contents
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows.]
81
Table of Contents
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Intermediary Sub, Acquisition Sub, the Parent External Adviser and the Company have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first written above by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.
RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Thomas B. Raterman |
|
|
|
Name: |
Thomas B. Raterman |
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer, |
|
|
|
Treasurer and Secretary |
RWAY PORTFOLIO HOLDING CORP. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Thomas B. Raterman |
|
|
|
Name: |
Thomas B. Raterman |
|
|
Title: |
President |
RWAY PORTFOLIO CORP. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Thomas B. Raterman |
|
|
|
Name: |
Thomas B. Raterman |
|
|
Title: |
President |
RUNWAY GROWTH CAPITAL LLC |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Thomas B. Raterman |
|
|
|
Name: |
Thomas B. Raterman |
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer, |
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer |
82
Table of Contents
SWK HOLDINGS CORPORATION |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Joe D. Staggs |
|
|
|
Name: |
Joe D. Staggs |
|
|
Title: |
President and Chief |
|
|
|
Executive Officer |
[Signature page to Agreement and Plan of Merger]
83
Table of Contents
Appendix A
As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
“Adviser Material Adverse Effect” shall mean any fact, circumstance, event, change, occurrence or effect that (1) would have, or would reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect on the business, condition (financial or otherwise), properties, liabilities, assets or results of operations of the Parent External Adviser, or (2) would, or would reasonably be expected to, materially impair, materially delay or prevent the Parent External Adviser or Parent from timely performing its obligations under this Agreement or consummating the transactions contemplated hereby; provided, however, that for purposes of the foregoing clause (1) only, none of the following shall constitute or be taken into account in determining whether an Adviser Material Adverse Effect shall have occurred or exists or would reasonably be expected to occur or exist: (i) changes in general economic, financial market, business, regulatory or geopolitical conditions; (ii) general changes or developments in any of the industries or markets in which the Parent External Adviser operates (or applicable portions or segments of such industries or markets); (iii) changes in any Applicable Laws or applicable accounting regulations or principles or interpretations thereof; (iv) any change in the price or trading volume of Parent’s securities, in and of itself (provided that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such change that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “Adviser Material Adverse Effect” shall be taken into account in determining whether there has been an Adviser Material Adverse Effect); (v) any failure by the Parent External Adviser to meet published analyst estimates or expectations of the Parent External Adviser’s revenue, earnings or other financial performance or results of operations for any period, in and of itself (provided that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such failure that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “Adviser Material Adverse Effect” shall be taken into account in determining whether there has been an Adviser Material Adverse Effect); (vi) any failure by the Parent External Adviser to meet its internal or published projections, budgets, plans or forecasts of its revenues, earnings or other financial performance or results of operations, in and of itself (provided that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such failure that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “Adviser Material Adverse Effect” shall be taken into account in determining whether there has been an Adviser Material Adverse Effect); (vii) any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or war or any act of terrorism, or any acts of God or natural disasters, epidemic, pandemic, disease outbreak; (viii) the negotiation, existence, announcement or performance of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including (A) the initiation of litigation by any Person with respect to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, (B) any termination of, reduction in or similar negative impact on relationships, contractual or otherwise, with any customers, suppliers, distributors, partners or employees of the Parent External Adviser (other than with respect to the Parent External Adviser’s relationship with Parent and its Subsidiaries) or (C) any loss or diminution of rights or privileges (including any redemption or repayment of investments), or any creation of, increase in or acceleration of obligations, pursuant to any Contract or otherwise, on the part of the Parent External Adviser, in each case due to the negotiation, announcement, existence or performance of this Agreement or the identity of the parties to this Agreement (or any communication by the Company regarding the plans or
84
Table of Contents
intentions of the Company with respect to the conduct of the business of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries), or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including compliance with the covenants set forth herein (in each case, other than with respect to any Contracts of the Parent External Adviser with Parent or any of its Subsidiaries) (provided, that when “Adviser Material Adverse Effect” is used in relation to the representations and warranties of the Parent External Adviser in Section 5.2(c) and Section 5.3, this clause (viii) shall be disregarded); (ix) any action taken by the Parent External Adviser which is required or expressly permitted by this Agreement; (x) any actions taken (or omitted to be taken) at the written request of, or with the consent of, the Company; provided that the facts, circumstances, events, changes, occurrences or effects set forth in clauses (i) through (iii) and (vii) above shall be taken into account in determining whether an Adviser Material Adverse Effect has occurred to the extent (but only to such extent) such facts, circumstances, events, changes, occurrences or effects have a disproportionate adverse impact on the Parent External Adviser, taken as a whole, relative to the other participants in the industries in which Parent and its Subsidiaries operate.
“Affiliate” of a Person shall mean any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls or is controlled by or is under common control with the first Person (it being understood that no portfolio company in which any Person has, directly or indirectly, made a debt or non-controlling equity investment that is, would or should be reflected in the schedule of investments included in the quarterly or annual reports of such Person that are filed with the SEC shall be an Affiliate of such Person).
“Aggregate Cash Consideration” shall mean an amount in cash equal to (i) the Closing Company Net Asset Value minus (ii) the Total Stock Consideration Value.
“Applicable Law” shall mean any domestic or foreign federal, state or local statute, law (whether statutory or common law), ordinance, rule, regulation, order, writ, judgment or directive (including those of any self-regulatory organization) applicable to and legally binding on the Parent External Adviser, Company, Parent, Intermediary Sub, Acquisition Sub or any of their respective Affiliates, directors, employees or agents, as the case may be.
“Blue Sky Laws” shall mean state securities or “blue sky” laws.
“Business Day” shall mean any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a day on which all banking institutions in New York, New York are authorized or obligated by Law or executive order to close.
“Closing Parent Net Asset Value” shall mean the Parent Net Asset Value as of 5:00 p.m. New York City Time on the Determination Date.
“Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
“Company Disclosure Letter” shall mean the disclosure letter delivered by the Company to Parent simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement.
“Company Equity Plan” means the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended.
85
Table of Contents
“Company Intellectual Property” shall mean all Intellectual Property that is owned or purported to be owned by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
“Company Material Adverse Effect” shall mean any fact, circumstance, event, change, occurrence or effect that (1) would have, or would reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect on the business, condition (financial or otherwise), properties, liabilities, assets or results of operations of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (2) would, or would reasonably be expected to, materially impair, materially delay or prevent the Company from timely performing its obligations under this Agreement or consummating the transactions contemplated hereby; provided, however, that, for purposes of the foregoing clause (1) only, none of the following shall constitute or be taken into account in determining whether a Company Material Adverse Effect shall have occurred or exists or would reasonably be expected to occur or exist: (i) changes in general economic, financial market, business, regulatory or geopolitical conditions; (ii) general changes or developments in any of the industries or markets in which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries operate (or applicable portions or segments of such industries or markets); (iii) changes in any Applicable Laws or applicable accounting regulations or principles or interpretations thereof; (iv) any change in the price or trading volume of the Company’s securities, in and of itself (provided that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such change that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “Company Material Adverse Effect” shall be taken into account in determining whether there has been a Company Material Adverse Effect); (v) any failure by the Company to meet published analyst estimates or expectations of the Company’s revenue, earnings or other financial performance or results of operations for any period, in and of itself (provided that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such failure that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “Company Material Adverse Effect” shall be taken into account in determining whether there has been a Company Material Adverse Effect); (vi) any failure by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to meet its internal or published projections, budgets, plans or forecasts of its revenues, earnings or other financial performance or results of operations, in and of itself (provided that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such failure that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “Company Material Adverse Effect” shall be taken into account in determining whether there has been a Company Material Adverse Effect); (vii) any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or war or any act of terrorism, or any acts of God or natural disasters, epidemic, pandemic, disease outbreak; (viii) the negotiation, existence, announcement, or performance of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including (A) the initiation of litigation by any Person with respect to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, (B) any termination of, reduction in or similar negative impact on relationships, contractual or otherwise, with any customers, suppliers, distributors, partners or employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries or (C) any loss or diminution of rights or privileges (including any redemption or repayment of investments), or any creation of, increase in or acceleration of obligations, pursuant to any Contract or otherwise, on the part of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, in each case due to the negotiation, announcement, existence or performance of this Agreement or the identity of the parties to this Agreement (or any communication by Parent regarding the plans or intentions of Parent with respect to the conduct of the business of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries), or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including compliance with the covenants set forth herein (provided, that when “Company Material Adverse Effect” is used in relation to the representations and warranties of the Company in Section 3.3(b) and Section 3.4, this clause
86
Table of Contents
(viii) shall be disregarded); (ix) any action taken by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, in each case which is required or expressly permitted by this Agreement; and (x) any actions taken (or omitted to be taken) at the written request of, or with the consent of, Parent; provided that the facts, circumstances, events, changes, occurrences or effects set forth in clauses (i) through (iii) and (vii) above shall be taken into account in determining whether a Company Material Adverse Effect has occurred to the extent (but only to such extent) such facts, circumstances, events, changes, occurrences or effects have a disproportionate adverse impact on the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to the other participants in the industries in which the Company and its Subsidiaries operate.
“Company Per Share NAV” means the quotient of (i) the Closing Company Net Asset Value divided by (ii) the number of shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the Determination Date (excluding any Cancelled Shares).
“Company Plan” means each material employee benefit plan, program, policy or agreement providing compensation or benefits to any current or former employee, consultant, officer or director of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any beneficiary or dependent thereof that is sponsored or maintained by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries contributes or is obligated to contribute or has any liability (contingent or other-wise) with respect to, whether or not written, including without limitation any employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of Section 3(1) of ERISA, any employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of Section 3(2) of ERISA (whether or not such plan is subject to ERISA) and any bonus, incentive, deferred compensation, vacation, equity or equity based incentive, severance, employment, change of control or fringe benefit plan, program or agreement, in each case, other than any such plan or arrangement that is maintained by a Governmental Authority or any such individual agreement that does not materially deviate from the form of agreement provided to Parent.
“Company Portfolio Company” shall mean any entity in which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has made, makes or proposes to make a debt or equity investment.
“Company Recommendation” shall mean the recommendation of the Company Board that the stockholders of the Company adopt this Agreement and approve the First Merger.
“Company Restricted Stock Award” means an award of restricted Company Common Stock granted under the Company Equity Plan.
“Company Termination Fee” shall mean $8,225,000.
“Confidentiality Agreement” shall mean the confidentiality agreement, dated August 26, 2024, between BC Partners Advisors L.P. and the Company.
“Contract” shall mean any agreement, contract, subcontract, lease, sublease, investment advisory agreement, administration agreement, conditional sales contract, purchase order, license, indenture, note, bond, loan, instrument, permit, franchise, or commitment or other legally binding agreement.
87
Table of Contents
“control” shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities or partnership or other interests, by contract or otherwise. For purposes of this definition, a general partner or managing member of a Person shall always be considered to control such Person. The terms “controlling” and “controlled” shall have correlative meanings.
“Data Protection Requirements” means any Applicable Laws, binding industry or self-regulatory standards and public or posted policies relating to privacy, data protection, and the processing (as defined in Applicable Laws), creation, receipt, maintenance, transmission, disclosure, collection and use of Personal Data, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (42 U.S.C. § 17921 et seq.), the applicable provisions of the 21st Century Cures Act (Pub. L. 116-32), and the regulations promulgated under these laws.
“Electing Share” means each share of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (excluding any Cancelled Shares) with respect to which an Election has been effectively made and not properly revoked or lost.
“Environmental Laws” shall mean all Laws and Orders relating to pollution, public or worker health or safety, or protection of the environment.
“ERISA” shall mean the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
“ERISA Affiliate” means any trade or business (whether or not incorporated) which is, or has at any relevant time been, under common control, or treated as a single employer, with the Company, Parent or any of their respective Subsidiaries, as applicable, under Sections 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Code.
“Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
“Exchange Ratio” shall mean the quotient (rounded to four decimal places) of (i) the Company Per Share NAV divided by (ii) the Parent Per Share NAV.
“Existing Credit Agreement” shall mean that certain Credit Agreement dated as of June 28, 2023, as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, by and among the Company, SWK Funding LLC, each of the financial institutions from time to time party thereto, and First Horizon Bank, as agent for the lenders party thereto.
“Existing Notes” shall mean the 9.00% Notes due 2027 issued pursuant to the Existing Notes Indenture.
“Existing Notes Indenture” shall mean that certain Indenture dated as of October 3, 2023, by and between the Company and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as amended pursuant to the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 3, 2023, by and between the Company and Wilmington Trust, National Association.
88
Table of Contents
“FDA” means the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or any successor agency.
“Fraud” means, of a Person, an intentional and willful misrepresentation of or with respect to a representation or warranty set forth in this Agreement, or in any certificate delivered hereunder, by such Person, which misrepresentation constitutes actual common law fraud (and not constructive fraud or negligent misrepresentation) with the specific intent to induce another party to rely upon such representation or warranty.
“GAAP” shall mean the United States generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied in accordance with past practice.
“Governmental Authority” shall mean any United States (federal, state or local) or foreign government, or any governmental, regulatory, judicial, legislative or administrative authority, department, agency, board, bureau or commission.
“Guaranteed Cash Payment” shall mean an amount equal to $9,000,000.
“Health Care Law” means any Applicable Law and guidance related to clinical research, testing, and medical product (including pharmaceuticals and biologics) development activities; the manufacture, packaging, labeling, storage, distribution, shipment, import, export, handling, dispensing, administration, possession, and disposal of such medical products; the preparation, submission and maintenance of records, reports, applications and other materials to Governmental Authorities with authority over such medical products and their use; the performance of laboratory tests; and other health regulatory matters, including, but not limited to: (i) the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 301, et seq.), FDA regulations (including FDA regulations regarding Good Manufacturing Practices, Good Laboratory Practices, Good Clinical Practices), and FDA and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Applicable Laws regarding human subjects research; (ii) the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Guidelines applicable to the Company’s services; (iii) the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, Pub. L. 100-578 and 42 CFR Part 493; (iv) the Federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., and the regulations of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; (v) 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7, 7a, 7b, and 7h; (vi) 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7h; (vii) 42 U.S.C. § 1395nn; (viii) the Civil False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733); (ix) FDA’s Fraud, Untrue Statements of Material Facts, Bribery and Illegal Gratuities Final Policy set forth in 56 Fed. Reg. 46191 (September 10, 1991); (x) the health care fraud criminal provisions under HIPAA; (xi) the Applicable Laws of state boards of pharmacy, medicine, and state departments of health; (xii) Applicable Laws pertaining to the professional practice of medicine; (xiii) the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148), as amended, and the federal Open Payments Program (42 C.F.R. Part 403); and (xiv) with respect to any of the Laws or documents described above in (i) through (xiii), any amendments to such Laws and any implementing, related or similar foreign, state or local Laws.
“Intellectual Property” means all worldwide intellectual property and proprietary rights, including all: (a) patents, patent applications, divisionals, continuations, continuations-in-part, reissues, re-examinations and foreign counterparts; (b) trademarks, service marks, trade dress, logos, trade names, social and mobile media identifiers, internet domain names, corporate names, and other source indicators, and all registrations and applications in
89
Table of Contents
connection therewith (together with all the goodwill of the business associated therein, and all common-law rights related thereto); (c) copyrights and registrations therefor; and (d) trade secrets and other rights in confidential or proprietary information, know-how, methods, processes and inventions.
“Intentional Breach” shall mean any material breach of this Agreement where the action or non-action constituting or giving rise to such material breach was intentionally undertaken by the party taking such action, with actual Knowledge that such action or non-action would or would reasonably be expected to constitute or give rise to a material breach of this Agreement.
“Investment Advisers Act” shall mean the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder.
“Investment Company Act” shall mean the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder.
“IRS” shall mean the United States Internal Revenue Service.
“IT Systems” means computers, hardware, firmware, software, code, websites, applications, systems, networks, databases and all other information technology related equipment and assets.
“Key Stockholders” shall mean Double Black Diamond Offshore Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company.
“Knowledge” shall mean (i) with respect to the Company, the actual knowledge, after reasonable inquiry of their respective direct reports, of those persons set forth in Section A-1 of the Company Disclosure Letter, (ii) with respect to Parent, the actual knowledge, after reasonable inquiry of their respective direct reports, of those persons set forth in Section A-1 of the Parent Disclosure Letter, and (iii) with respect to the Parent External Adviser, the actual knowledge, after reasonable inquiry of their respective direct reports, of those persons set forth in Section A-1 of the Parent External Adviser Disclosure Letter.
“Law” shall mean any and all domestic (federal, state or local) or foreign laws (including common law), rules, regulations, orders, judgments or decrees promulgated by any Governmental Authority.
“Lien” shall mean liens, claims, mortgages, deeds of trust, rights of way, easements, building or use restrictions, restriction on transfer, encumbrances, pledges, security interests or charges of any kind whether voluntarily incurred or arising by operation of Law or otherwise.
“Merger Consideration” shall mean the sum of (i) the Total Stock Consideration and (ii) the Aggregate Cash Consideration.
“NASDAQ” shall mean The Nasdaq Global Select Market or The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, as applicable.
90
Table of Contents
“Non-Electing Share” means each share of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (excluding any Cancelled Shares) that is not an Electing Share.
“Order” shall mean any decree, order, determination, judgment, injunction, temporary restraining order or other order in any Proceeding.
“Parent Disclosure Letter” shall mean the disclosure letter delivered by Parent to the Company simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement.
“Parent External Adviser Disclosure Letter” shall mean the disclosure letter delivered by the Parent External Adviser to the Company simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement.
“Parent Intellectual Property” shall mean all Intellectual Property that is owned or purported to be owned by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries.
“Parent Investment Advisory Agreement” shall mean the agreement entered into by the Parent External Adviser with Parent for the purpose of providing investment advisory or investment management services.
“Parent Material Adverse Effect” shall mean any fact, circumstance, event, change, occurrence or effect that (1) would have, or would reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect on the business, condition (financial or otherwise), properties, liabilities, assets or results of operations of Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (2) would, or would reasonably be expected to, materially impair, materially delay or prevent Parent from timely performing its obligations under this Agreement or consummating the transactions contemplated hereby; provided, however, that, for purposes of the foregoing clause (1) only, none of the following shall constitute or be taken into account in determining whether a Parent Material Adverse Effect shall have occurred or exists or would reasonably be expected to occur or exist: (i) changes in general economic, financial market, business, regulatory or geopolitical conditions; (ii) general changes or developments in any of the industries or markets in which Parent, any of its Subsidiaries, or any of the Parent Portfolio Companies operate (or applicable portions or segments of such industries or markets); (iii) changes in any Applicable Laws or applicable accounting regulations or principles or interpretations thereof; (iv) any change in the price or trading volume of Parent’s or any of the Parent Portfolio Companies’ securities, in and of itself (provided that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such change that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “Parent Material Adverse Effect” shall be taken into account in determining whether there has been a Parent Material Adverse Effect); (v) any failure by Parent or any of the Parent Portfolio Companies to meet published analyst estimates or expectations of Parent’s or such Parent Portfolio Company’s revenue, earnings or other financial performance or results of operations for any period, in and of itself (provided that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such failure that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “Parent Material Adverse Effect” shall be taken into account in determining whether there has been a Parent Material Adverse Effect); (vi) any failure after the date hereof by Parent, any of its Subsidiaries, or any Parent Portfolio Company to meet its internal or published projections, budgets, plans or forecasts of its revenues, earnings or other financial performance
91
Table of Contents
or results of operations, in and of itself (provided that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such failure that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “Parent Material Adverse Effect” shall be taken into account in determining whether there has been a Parent Material Adverse Effect); (vii) any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or war or any act of terrorism, or any acts of God or natural disasters, epidemic, pandemic, disease outbreak; (viii) the negotiation, existence, announcement or performance of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including (A) the initiation of litigation by any Person with respect to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, (B) any termination of, reduction in or similar negative impact on relationships, contractual or otherwise, with any Parent Portfolio Companies or any customers, suppliers, distributors, partners or employees of Parent and its Subsidiaries or (C) any loss or diminution of rights or privileges (including any redemption or repayment of investments), or any creation of, increase in or acceleration of obligations, pursuant to any Contract or otherwise, on the part of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any Parent Portfolio Company, in each case due to the negotiation, announcement, existence or performance of this Agreement or the identity of the parties to this Agreement (or any communication by the Company regarding the plans or intentions of the Company with respect to the conduct of the business of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries), or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including compliance with the covenants set forth herein (provided, that when “Parent Material Adverse Effect” is used in relation to the representations and warranties of Parent in Section 4.3(d) and Section 4.4, this clause (viii) shall be disregarded); (ix) any action taken by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any Parent Portfolio Company, in each case which is required or expressly permitted by this Agreement; and (x) any actions taken (or omitted to be taken) at the written request of, or with the consent of, the Company; provided that the facts, circumstances, events, changes, occurrences or effects set forth in clauses (i) through (iii) and (vii) above shall be taken into account in determining whether a Parent Material Adverse Effect has occurred to the extent (but only to such extent) such facts, circumstances, events, changes, occurrences or effects have a disproportionate adverse impact on the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to the other participants in the industries in which Parent and its Subsidiaries operate.
“Parent Net Asset Value” means the estimated net asset value of Parent, calculated in good faith and determined in accordance with the Valuation Methodology.
“Parent Organizational Documents” shall mean the certificate of incorporation, bylaws (or equivalent organizational or governing documents), and other organizational or governing documents, agreements or arrangements, each as amended to date, of each of Parent, Intermediary Sub and Acquisition Sub.
“Parent Per Share NAV” shall mean the quotient of (i) the Closing Parent Net Asset Value divided by (ii) the number of shares of Parent Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the Determination Date.
“Parent Portfolio Company” shall mean any entity in which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has made, makes or proposes to make a debt or equity investment, that is or would be reflected in the Schedule of Investments included in Parent’s quarterly or annual reports.
92
Table of Contents
“Per Share Guaranteed Cash Payment” shall mean the quotient of (i) the Guaranteed Cash Payment divided by (ii) the number of shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the Determination Date (excluding any Cancelled Shares).
“Per Share Merger Consideration” shall mean, (i) in the case of a Non-Electing Share, the Per Share Stock Consideration, and (ii) in the case of an Electing Share, the Per Share Cash Consideration, in each case, as may be adjusted pursuant to Section 2.1(a)(ii)(3) and Section 2.1(a)(ii)(4).
“Permit” shall mean any license, permit, variance, exemption, approval, qualification, or Order of any Governmental Authority.
“Permitted Lien” shall mean (i) any Lien for Taxes not yet due, being contested in good faith or for which adequate accruals or reserves have been established in accordance with GAAP, (ii) statutory Liens of landlords and Liens of carriers, warehousemen, mechanics, materialmen, repairmen and other Liens imposed by Law that are not the result of delinquent payments and for which adequate reserves are held in accordance with GAAP, (iii) Liens incurred or deposits made in the ordinary course of business in connection with workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance or other types of social security or foreign equivalents, (iv) zoning, building codes, and other land use Laws regulating the use or occupancy of leased real property or the activities conducted thereon that are imposed by any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over such leased real property and which are not violated by the current use and operation of such leased real property or the operation of the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries, (v) with respect to all leased real property, all Liens encumbering the interest of the fee owner or any superior lessor, sublessor or licensor, (vi) such Liens or other imperfections of title, if any, that do not have, and would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect or Parent Material Adverse Effect (as applicable), including Liens for any supplemental Taxes or assessments not shown by the public records, (vii) Liens disclosed on existing title reports or existing surveys provided to Parent, (viii) Liens securing acquisition financing with respect to the applicable asset, including refinancings thereof, (ix) Liens described in Appendix A to the Company Disclosure Letter or the Parent Disclosure Letter (as applicable), (x) any other Liens that will be released on or prior to the Closing Date and (xi) the replacement, extension or renewal of any of the foregoing.
“Person” shall mean an individual, a corporation, a limited liability company, a partnership, an association, a trust or any other entity or organization, including a Governmental Authority.
“Personal Data” has the same meaning as the term “personal data”, “personal information”, “personally identifiable information”, or “protected health information”, “consumer health data” “medical records”, “health information”, animal health information, and similar terms under applicable Data Protection Requirements, and any other Applicable Laws the purpose of which is to protect the privacy of individuals, prescribers or animal owners.
“Proceeding” shall mean an action, suit, arbitration, investigation, examination, litigation, lawsuit or other proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, by or before a Governmental Authority.
93
Table of Contents
“Representative” shall mean, with respect to any Person, such Person’s Affiliates and its and their respective officers, directors, managers, partners, employees, agents, accountants, counsel, financial advisors, consultants and other advisors or representatives.
“Rights Agreement” shall mean that certain Rights Agreement by and between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent, dated as of April 8, 2016 (as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated as of April 8, 2019, Amendment No. 2 thereto, dated as of February 23, 2021 and Amendment No. 3 thereto, dated as of March 31, 2022).
“SEC” shall mean the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
“Securities Act” shall mean the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
“Securities Laws” shall mean the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the Investment Company Act, the Investment Advisers Act, Blue Sky Laws, all similar foreign securities laws, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
“Security” shall mean, with respect to any Person, any series of common stock, preferred stock and any other equity securities or capital stock of such Person (including interests convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any equity interest in any such series of common stock, preferred stock, and any other equity securities or capital stock of such Person), however described and whether voting or non-voting.
“Subsidiary” shall mean, as to any Person, any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association or other business entity that is consolidated with such Person for financial reporting purposes under GAAP.
“SWK Advisors LLC” shall mean SWK Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
“Tax” or “Taxes” shall mean any and all taxes, fees, levies, duties, tariffs, imposts, and other similar charges (together with any and all interest, penalties and additions to tax) imposed by any Governmental Authority or Taxing Authority including taxes or other charges on or with respect to income, franchises, windfall or other profits, escheat, gross receipts, property, sales, use, capital stock, payroll, employment, social security, workers’ compensation, unemployment compensation, or net worth, and taxes or other charges in the nature of excise, withholding, ad valorem, stamp, transfer, value added, or gains taxes.
“Tax Dividend” shall mean a dividend or dividends, with respect to any applicable tax year, which is deductible pursuant to the dividends paid deduction under Section 562 of the Code, and shall have the effect of distributing to the Company’s stockholders all of its previously undistributed (i) “investment company taxable income” within the meaning of Section 852(b) of the Code (determined without regard to Section 852(b)(2)(D) of the Code), (ii) any prior year shortfall as determined under Section 4982(b)(2) of the Code, (iii) amounts constituting the excess of (A) the amount specified in Section 852(a)(1)(B)(i) of the Code over (B) the amount specified in Section 852(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the Code, and (iv) net capital gain (within
94
Table of Contents
the meaning of Section 1222(11) of the Code), if any, in each case recognized either in the applicable tax year or any prior tax year.
“Tax Returns” shall mean returns, reports, form or information statements, including any schedule or attachment thereto or any amendment thereof, with respect to Taxes filed or required to be filed with the IRS or any other Governmental Authority or Taxing Authority.
“Taxing Authority” shall mean any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over the assessment, determination, collection or other imposition of any Tax.
“Third Party” shall mean any Person or group of Persons other than Parent, Intermediary Sub, Acquisition Sub and their respective Affiliates.
“Total Stock Consideration” shall mean a number of shares of Parent Common Stock equal to the lesser of (i) the quotient of (a) $75,500,000 divided by (b) the Parent Per Share NAV and (ii) the product of (a) the number of shares of Parent Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the Closing Date multiplied by (b) .199, as may be adjusted pursuant to Section 2.1(a)(ii)(3) and Section 2.1(a)(ii)(4).
“Total Stock Consideration Value” shall mean an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the Total Stock Consideration multiplied by (ii) the Parent Per Share NAV.
Table of Definitions
Term |
Section |
2025 Audited Financial Statements |
Section 6.22 |
Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement |
Section 6.6(c) |
Acceptable Courts |
Section 9.8 |
Acquisition Sub |
Preamble |
Adjudicated Asset Value |
Section 2.7(f)(i) |
Affiliate Arrangement |
Section 3.28 |
Agreement |
Preamble |
Alternative Acquisition Agreement |
Section 6.6(d) |
Alternative Structure |
Section 1.7 |
Antitrust Laws |
Section 6.4(a) |
Articles of Third Merger |
Section 1.3(c) |
ASC |
Section 2.7(f)(vi) |
Asset Valuation Range |
Section 2.7(f)(i) |
Bankruptcy and Equity Exception |
Section 3.3(a) |
BDC |
Recitals |
Benefit Plan Investor |
Section 3.27(a) |
Book-Entry Shares |
Section 2.1(a)(iii) |
Cancelled Shares |
Section 2.1(a)(i) |
Certificate of First Merger |
Section 1.3(a) |
Certificate of Second Merger |
Section 1.3(b) |
Certificate of Third Merger |
Section 1.3(c) |
Certificates |
Section 2.1(a)(iii) |
95
Table of Contents
Term |
Section |
Claim |
Section 4.27 |
Closing |
Section 1.2 |
Closing Company Net Asset Value |
Section 2.7(b) |
Closing Date |
Section 1.2 |
Company |
Preamble |
Company Adverse Recommendation Change |
Section 6.6(d) |
Company Board |
Recitals |
Company Common Stock |
Section 1.7 |
Company Forecasts |
Section 3.31 |
Company Fundamental Representations |
Section 7.2(a) |
Company Leased Real Property |
Section 3.16(b) |
Company Material Contract |
Section 3.15(a) |
Company No MAE Rep |
Section 7.2(a) |
Company Real Property Leases |
Section 3.16(b) |
Company Registered Intellectual Property |
Section 3.13(a) |
Company SEC Documents |
Section 3.6(a) |
Company Stockholder Approval |
Section 3.19 |
Company Stockholders’ Meeting |
Section 6.3(a) |
Company Valuation Firm |
Section 2.7(a) |
Company’s Bylaws |
Section 3.1 |
Company’s Charter |
Section 3.1 |
Competing Proposal |
Section 6.6(g)(i) |
Consent |
Section 3.4 |
Continuing Employees |
Section 6.17(b) |
D&O Indemnified Parties |
Section 6.7(a) |
D&O Insurance |
Section 6.7(c) |
Debt |
Section 4.27 |
Delaware Secretary |
Section 1.3(a) |
Determination Date |
Section 2.7(b) |
DGCL |
Recitals |
Dissenting Shares |
Section 2.4 |
Effective Time |
Section 1.3(a) |
Election |
Section 2.3(a) |
Election Date |
Section 2.3(b) |
Estimated Closing Company Portfolio Asset Value |
Section 2.7(b) |
Exchange Agent |
Section 2.2(a) |
Exchange Fund |
Section 2.2(a) |
First Merger |
Recitals |
Form N‑14 |
Section 3.7 |
Form of Election |
Section 2.3(b) |
HSR Act |
Section 3.4 |
Inquiry |
Section 6.6(a) |
Interim Period |
Section 6.1 |
Intermediary Sub |
Preamble |
IRB |
Section 3.26(f) |
96
Table of Contents
Term |
Section |
Key Stockholder Agreement |
Recitals |
KBW |
Section 3.20 |
MD SDAT |
Section 1.3(c) |
Mergers |
Recitals |
MGCL |
Recitals |
Non-Election Holder |
Section 2.1(a)(ii)(1) |
Non-Recourse Party |
Section 8.3(d) |
Notice of Superior Proposal |
Section 6.6(d)(i) |
Parent |
Preamble |
Parent Board |
Recitals |
Parent Common Stock |
Section 2.1(a)(ii) |
Parent External Adviser |
Preamble |
Parent External Adviser Documents |
Section 5.1 |
Parent Forecasts |
Section 3.30 |
Parent Fundamental Representations |
Section 7.3(a) |
Parent Leased Real Property |
Section 4.17(b) |
Parent Material Contract |
Section 4.16(a) |
Parent No MAE Rep |
Section 7.3(a) |
Parent Registered Intellectual Property |
Section 4.14(a) |
Parent SEC Documents |
Section 4.6(a) |
Payoff Amount |
Section 6.18 |
Payoff Letter |
Section 6.18 |
Per Share Cash Consideration |
Section 2.1(a)(ii) |
Per Share Stock Consideration |
Section 2.1(a)(ii) |
Proposed Aggregate Stock Issuance Amount |
Section 2.1(a)(ii)(3) |
Proposed Cash Consideration |
Section 2.1(a)(ii)(4) |
Proxy Statement |
Section 3.7 |
Remedial Action |
Section 6.4(a) |
Required Permit |
Section 3.5(d) |
RIC |
Section 4.15(j) |
R&W Policy |
Section 6.19 |
Second Effective Time |
Section 1.3(b) |
Second Merger |
Recitals |
Service Provider |
Section 3.12(e) |
Solvent |
Section 4.27 |
Specified Number |
Section 2.3(a) |
Stockholder Litigation |
Section 6.16 |
Superior Proposal |
Section 6.6(g)(ii) |
Surviving Corporation |
Recitals |
Takeover Statutes |
Section 3.18 |
Tax Attribute |
Section 3.14(m) |
Termination Date |
Section 8.1(b)(i) |
Third Effective Time |
Section 1.3(c) |
Third Merger |
Recitals |
Total Per Share Consideration |
Section 2.1(a)(ii) |
97
Table of Contents

The Board of Directors - SWK Holdings Corporation
October 9, 2025
Page 1 of 4
October 9, 2025
The Board of Directors
SWK Holdings Corporation
5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 650
Dallas, TX 75225
Members of the Board of Directors:
You have requested the opinion of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (“KBW” or “we”) as investment bankers as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the common stockholders of SWK Holdings Corporation (“SWKH”), collectively as a group, of the Aggregate Merger Consideration (as defined below) in the proposed merger of RWAY Portfolio Corp. (“Acquisition Sub”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of RWAY Portfolio Holding Corp. (“Intermediary Sub”) and indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Runway Growth Finance Corp. (“Runway”), with and into SWKH with SWKH as the surviving company (such transaction, the “First Merger” and, taken together with the immediately subsequent merger of SWKH with and into Intermediary Sub and, in turn, the immediately subsequent merger of Intermediary Sub with and into Runway, the “Transaction”), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) to be entered into by and among SWKH, Runway, Intermediary Sub, Acquisition Sub, and Runway Growth Capital, LLC, the external adviser of Runway (“Runway Adviser”). Pursuant to the Agreement and subject to the terms, conditions and limitations set forth therein, at the Effective Time (as defined in the Agreement), by virtue of the First Merger and without any action on the part of SWKH, Runway, Acquisition Sub or the holders of any securities of SWKH or Acquisition Sub, each share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of SWKH (“SWKH Common Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than Cancelled Shares (as defined in the Agreement)) shall be converted into the right to receive (1) subject to certain election, proration and reallocation procedures as set forth in the Agreement (as to which procedures we express no opinion), either (A) a number of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Runway (“Runway Common Stock”), equal to the quotient (rounded to four decimal places) of (i) the Company Per Share NAV (as defined in the Agreement) divided by (ii) the Parent Per Share NAV (as defined in the Agreement) (the “Stock Consideration”) or (B) if an Election (as defined in the Agreement) has been effectively made, an amount of cash equal to the Company Per Share NAV (the “Cash Consideration”), as applicable, plus (2) the quotient of (A) a cash amount equal to $9,000,000 (the “Guaranteed Cash Payment”) divided by (B) the number of shares of SWKH Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the Determination Date (as defined in the Agreement) (excluding any Cancelled Shares); provided that, pursuant to such election, proration and reallocation procedures set forth in the Agreement, the aggregate Stock Consideration will be a number of shares of Runway Common Stock (not to exceed 19.9% of the shares of Runway Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the Closing Date (as defined in the Agreement)) equal to the quotient of (a) $75,500,000 divided by (b) the Parent Per Share NAV, and the aggregate Cash Consideration will be an amount in cash equal to (i) the Closing Company Net Asset Value (as defined in the Agreement), minus (ii) the Total Stock Consideration Value (as defined in the Agreement). At the direction of SWKH and without independent verification, we have relied upon and assumed for purposes of our analyses and this opinion, that the Parent Per Share NAV will be $13.66 (as if the Parent Per Share NAV were equal to the publicly reported June 30, 2025 net asset value per share of Runway Common Stock) and the Closing Company Net Asset Value will be approximately $234.6 million and that, as a result thereof, the aggregate Stock Consideration will be approximately 5.5 million shares of Runway Common Stock and the aggregate Cash Consideration will be approximately $159.1 million. Such resulting aggregate Stock Consideration, such resulting aggregate Cash Consideration and the Guaranteed Cash Payment, taken together, are referred to herein as the “Aggregate Merger Consideration.” The terms and conditions of the Transaction are more fully set forth in the Agreement.
KBW has acted as financial advisor to the Board and not as an advisor to or agent of any other person. As part of our investment banking business, we are regularly engaged in the valuation of securities of specialty finance companies in connection with acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for various other purposes. In the ordinary course of KBW and its affiliates’ broker-dealer businesses, KBW and its affiliates may from time to time purchase securities from, and sell securities to, SWKH, Runway and Runway Adviser. In addition, as market makers in securities, we and our affiliates may from time to time have a long or short position in, and buy or sell, debt or equity securities of SWKH and Runway for our and their own accounts and for the accounts of our and their respective customers and clients. We have acted exclusively for the Board in rendering this opinion and will receive a fee from SWKH for our services. A portion of our fee is payable upon the rendering of this opinion and a significant portion is contingent upon the successful completion of the First Merger. In addition, SWKH has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities arising out of our engagement.
B-1
Table of Contents

The Board of Directors - SWK Holdings Corporation
October 9, 2025
Page 2 of 4
Other than in connection with this present engagement, in the past two years, KBW has not provided investment banking or financial advisory services to SWKH. In the past two years, KBW has provided investment banking and financial advisory services to Runway and has received compensation for such services. KBW acted as a joint book-running manager in connection with Runway’s November 2023 and May 2024 offerings of common stock. In the past two years, KBW has not provided investment banking or financial advisory services to Runway Adviser. We may in the future provide investment banking and financial advisory services to SWKH, Runway, Runway Adviser or other affiliates of Runway Adviser and receive compensation for such services. In addition, KBW acted as financial advisor to the Committee of Independent Directors of the Board of Directors of Portman Ridge Finance Corporation in connection with the recently completed acquisition by Portman Ridge Finance Corporation of Logan Ridge Finance Corporation.
In connection with this opinion, we have reviewed, analyzed and relied upon material bearing upon the financial and operating condition of SWKH and Runway and bearing upon the Transaction, including among other things, the following: (i) a draft of the Agreement dated October 8, 2025 (the most recent draft made available to us); (ii) the audited financial statements and Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 of SWKH; (iii) the unaudited quarterly financial statements and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025 of SWKH; (iv) the audited financial statements and Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 of Runway; (v) the unaudited quarterly financial statements and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025 of Runway; (vi) certain other interim reports and other communications of SWKH and Runway provided to their respective stockholders; and (vii) other financial information concerning the respective businesses and operations of SWKH and Runway furnished to us by SWKH and Runway or which we were otherwise directed to use for purposes of our analysis. Our consideration of financial information and other factors that we deemed appropriate under the circumstances or relevant to our analyses included, among others, the following: (i) the historical and current financial position and results of operations of SWKH and Runway; (ii) the assets and liabilities of SWKH and Runway; (iii) the nature and terms of certain other merger transactions and business combinations in the business development company (“BDC”) industry; (iv) a comparison of certain financial and stock market information for SWKH and Runway with similar information for certain other companies the securities of which are publicly traded; (v) financial and operating forecasts and projections of SWKH that were prepared by SWKH management, provided to us and discussed with us by such management, and used and relied upon by us at the direction of such management and with the consent of the Board; and (vi) publicly available consensus “street estimates” of Runway that were discussed with us by Runway and Runway Adviser management and used and relied upon by us based on such discussions, at the direction of SWKH management and with the consent of the Board. We have also performed such other studies and analyses as we considered appropriate and have taken into account our assessment of general economic, market and financial conditions and our experience in other transactions, as well as our experience in securities valuation and knowledge of the BDC industry generally. We have also participated in discussions that were held with the management of SWKH and the management of Runway and Runway Adviser regarding the respective past and current business operations, regulatory relations, financial condition and future prospects of SWKH and Runway and such other matters as we have deemed relevant to our inquiry. In addition, we have considered the results of the efforts undertaken by SWKH, with our assistance, to solicit indications of interest from third parties regarding a potential transaction with SWKH.
In conducting our review and arriving at our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information that was provided to or discussed with us or that was publicly available and we have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of any such information or assumed any responsibility or liability for such verification, accuracy or completeness. We have relied upon the management of SWKH as to the reasonableness and achievability of the financial and operating forecasts and projections of SWKH referred to above (and the assumptions and bases therefor), and we have assumed that such forecasts and projections have been reasonably prepared and represent the best currently available estimates and judgments of such management. We have further relied, with the consent of SWKH management, upon Runway and Runway Adviser management as to the reasonableness and achievability of the publicly available consensus “street estimates” of Runway referred to above (and the assumptions and bases therefor), and we have assumed that such estimates are consistent with the best currently available estimates and judgments of Runway and Runway Adviser management.
It is understood that the foregoing financial information of SWKH that was provided to us was not prepared with the expectation of public disclosure and that all of the foregoing financial information of SWKH and Runway, including the publicly available consensus “street estimates” of Runway referred to above, are based on numerous variables and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and, accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from those set forth in such information. We have relied on all such information without independent verification or analysis and do not in any respect assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or
B-2
Table of Contents

The Board of Directors - SWK Holdings Corporation
October 9, 2025
Page 3 of 4
completeness thereof. We have assumed, based on discussions with the management of SWKH and the management of Runway and Runway Adviser, and with the consent of the Board, that all such information provides a reasonable basis upon which we can form our opinion and we express no view as to any such information or the assumptions or bases therefor. Among other things, the financial and operating forecasts and projections of SWKH referred to above assume an orderly wind down scenario ending in 2030 and reflect assumptions regarding limitations on SWKH’s ability to utilize deferred tax assets.
We also have assumed that there have been no material changes in the assets, liabilities, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects of either SWKH or Runway since the date of the last financial statements of each such entity that were made available to us. In rendering our opinion, we have not made or obtained any evaluations or appraisals or physical inspection of the property, assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of SWKH or Runway, the collateral securing any of such assets or liabilities, or the collectability of any such assets, nor have we examined any individual loan or credit files, nor did we evaluate the solvency, financial capability or fair value of SWKH or Runway under any state or federal laws, including those relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or other matters. We express no view as to the value of any investment asset owned by SWKH or Runway that is used in connection with the net asset value computations made by SWKH or Runway or the valuation policies and procedures of SWKH or Runway in connection therewith. Estimates of values of companies and assets do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which companies or assets may actually be sold. Such estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty and should not be taken as our view of the actual value of any companies or assets.
We have assumed, in all respects material to our analyses, the following: (i) that the Transaction and any related transactions will be completed substantially in accordance with the terms set forth in the Agreement (the final terms of which we have assumed will not differ in any respect material to our analyses from the draft reviewed by us and referred to above), with no adjustments to the Aggregate Merger Consideration (including the stock or cash components thereof) and no other consideration or payments in respect of SWKH Common Stock; (ii) that the representations and warranties of each party in the Agreement and in all related documents and instruments referred to in the Agreement are true and correct; (iii) that each party to the Agreement and all related documents will perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by such party under such documents; (iv) that there are no factors that would delay or subject to any adverse conditions, any necessary regulatory or governmental approval for the Transaction or any related transactions and that all conditions to the completion of the Transaction and any related transactions will be satisfied without any waivers or modifications to the Agreement or any of the related documents; and (v) that in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory, contractual, or other consents or approvals for the Transaction and any related transactions, no restrictions, including any divestiture requirements, termination or other payments or amendments or modifications, will be imposed that will have a material adverse effect on the future results of operations or financial condition of SWKH, Runway or the pro forma entity, or the contemplated benefits of the Transaction. We have assumed that the Transaction will be consummated in a manner that complies with the applicable provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all other applicable federal and state statutes, rules and regulations. We have further been advised by representatives of SWKH that SWKH has relied upon advice from its advisors (other than KBW) or other appropriate sources as to all legal, financial reporting, tax, accounting and regulatory matters with respect to SWKH, Runway, Acquisition Sub, Intermediary Sub, the Transaction and any related transaction, and the Agreement. KBW has not provided advice with respect to any such matters.
This opinion addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, as of the date hereof, to holders of SWKH Common Stock, collectively as a group, of the Aggregate Merger Consideration in the First Merger, without regard to the individual circumstances of the Key Stockholders (as defined in the Agreement) or any other specific holders of SWKH Common Stock with respect to control, voting or other rights or aspects which may distinguish such holders. We express no view or opinion as to any other terms or aspects of the Transaction or any term or aspect of any related transaction, including without limitation, the form or structure of the Transaction (including the form and structure of the Aggregate Merger Consideration or the allocation thereof between cash and stock) or any such related transaction, the treatment of existing loan and bond indebtedness of SWKH, any consequences of the Transaction or any such related transaction to SWKH, its stockholders, creditors or otherwise, or any terms, aspects, merits or implications of any representations and warranties insurance policy, employment, consulting, voting, support, stockholder or other agreements, arrangements or understandings contemplated or entered into in connection with the Transaction or otherwise. Our opinion is necessarily based upon conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date hereof and the information made available to us through the date hereof. There is currently significant volatility in the stock and other financial markets arising from global tensions and political division, economic uncertainty, recently announced actual or threatened imposition of tariff increases, inflation, and prolonged higher interest rates. It is understood that subsequent developments may affect the conclusion reached in this opinion and that KBW does not have an obligation to update, revise or reaffirm this opinion. It is understood that subsequent developments may affect the conclusion reached in this opinion and that KBW does not have an obligation to update, revise or reaffirm this opinion. We express no view or opinion as to any changes
B-3
Table of Contents

The Board of Directors - SWK Holdings Corporation
October 9, 2025
Page 4 of 4
after the date hereof to the Parent Per Share NAV or the Closing Company Net Asset Value (and the resulting aggregate Stock Consideration and the resulting aggregate Cash Consideration) from the amounts thereof that we have been directed to assume for purposes of our analyses and this opinion. Our opinion does not address, and we express no view or opinion with respect to, (i) the underlying business decision of SWKH to engage in the Transaction or enter into the Agreement, (ii) the relative merits of the Transaction as compared to any strategic alternatives that are, have been or may be available to or contemplated by SWKH or the Board, (iii) the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to any of SWKH’s officers, directors or employees, or any class of such persons, relative to the compensation to the holders of SWKH Common Stock, (iv) the effect of the Transaction or any related transaction on, or the fairness of the consideration to be received by, holders of any class of securities of SWKH (other than the holders of SWKH Common Stock, collectively as a group, solely with respect to the Aggregate Merger Consideration (as described herein) and not relative to the consideration to be received by holders of any other class of securities) or holders of any class of securities of Runway or any other party to any transaction contemplated by the Agreement, (v) any fees payable by Runway to Runway Adviser for investment advisory and management services, (vi) what the Parent Per Share NAV or the Closing Company Net Asset Value (and the resulting aggregate Stock Consideration and the resulting aggregate Cash Consideration) actually will be. whether Runway has sufficient cash, available lines of credit or other sources of funds to enable it to pay the aggregate Cash Consideration to the holders of SWKH Common Stock at the closing of the First Merger and whether Runway Adviser also has sufficient cash, available lines of credit or other sources of funds to enable it to pay the Guaranteed Cash Payment to the holders of SWKH Common Stock at the closing of the First Merger, (vii) any elections by holders of SWKH Common Stock to receive the Cash Consideration in lieu of the Stock Consideration, or the actual allocation between cash and shares of Runway Common Stock among such holders (including, without limitation, any reallocation thereof as a result of proration pursuant to the Agreement) or the relative fairness of the Stock Consideration and the Cash Consideration, (viii) any adjustment (as provided in the Agreement) to the aggregate Stock Consideration or the aggregate Cash Consideration assumed for purposes of our opinion; (ix) the actual value of Runway Common Stock to be issued in the First Merger, (x) the prices, trading range or volume at which Runway Common Stock or SWKH Common Stock will trade following the public announcement of the Transaction or the prices, trading range or volume at which Runway Common Stock will trade following the consummation of the Transaction, (xi) any advice or opinions provided by any other advisor to any of the parties to the Transaction or any other transaction contemplated by the Agreement, or (xii) any legal, regulatory, accounting, tax or similar matters relating to SWKH, Runway, their respective stockholders, Acquisition Sub or Intermediary Sub, or relating to or arising out of or as a consequence of the Transaction or any related transaction.
This opinion is for the information of, and is directed to, the Board (in its capacity as such) in connection with their respective consideration of the financial terms of the Transaction. This opinion does not constitute a recommendation to the Board as to how it should vote on the Transaction, or to any holder of SWKH Common Stock or any stockholder of any other entity as to how to vote or act in connection with the Transaction or any other matter (including, with respect to holders of SWKH Common Stock, what election any such stockholder should make with respect to receiving the Cash Consideration in lieu of the Stock Consideration), nor does it constitute a recommendation regarding whether or not any such stockholder should enter into a voting, stockholders’, or affiliates’ agreement with respect to the Transaction or exercise any dissenters’ or appraisal rights that may be available to such stockholder.
This opinion has been reviewed and approved by our Fairness Opinion Committee in conformity with our policies and procedures established under the requirements of Rule 5150 of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Aggregate Merger Consideration in the First Merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of SWKH Common Stock, collectively as a group.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc
B-4
Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents





