[SC 14D9/A] scPharmaceuticals Inc. Amended Tender Offer Recommendation
scPharmaceuticals filed an amendment to its Schedule 14D-9 regarding the tender offer by a MannKind subsidiary to acquire all outstanding shares for $5.35 per share in cash plus one contingent value right (CVR) per share that may pay up to $1.00 upon achievement of specified regulatory and net sales milestones. The amendment replaces two paragraphs under "Regulatory Approvals" in Item 8 of the Schedule 14D-9 and notes the Company received thirteen demand letters alleging disclosure deficiencies and one Section 220 books-and-records demand. The Company states it believes those claims are without merit. The amendment is signed by the CEO on September 22, 2025.
- Offer price clearly stated: $5.35 per share in cash
- Additional upside via CVR: one CVR per share potentially paying up to $1.00 upon specified milestones
- Amendment provides updated regulatory-approvals disclosure: replaces two paragraphs to reflect certain updates
- Shareholder challenges: thirteen demand letters alleging disclosure deficiencies
- Section 220 demand: one purported stockholder requested books and records under Delaware law
- Potential for delay or litigation: although the Company contests the claims, these demands could lead to disputes about disclosure adequacy
Insights
TL;DR: Offer structured as $5.35 cash plus a CVR up to $1.00; amendment updates regulatory disclosure and notes shareholder demand letters.
This amendment clarifies portions of the regulatory approvals disclosure in the Schedule 14D-9 and formally records that multiple stockholders have sent demand letters claiming disclosure deficiencies, plus one Section 220 request. From an M&A perspective, the economic terms of the Offer (cash plus CVR) are explicit and unchanged in this amendment; the CVR ties future payments to regulatory and sales milestones which can affect ultimate consideration realized by sellers. The disclosed shareholder demands represent potential procedural or disclosure disputes that could delay closing if pursued, but the Company states it believes the claims lack merit.
TL;DR: Amendment revises regulatory-approval language and documents multiple shareholder demands alleging disclosure gaps; company contests the claims.
The filing demonstrates active shareholder scrutiny around disclosure adequacy during the tender process. The replacement of two paragraphs in the "Regulatory Approvals" section indicates a targeted clarification or correction to previously filed language. The receipt of thirteen demand letters and a Section 220 request signals governance friction; these are procedural actions that often seek additional disclosure or books and records but do not by themselves prove material legal liability. The Company’s explicit position that the claims are without merit is noted in the amendment.