As previously reported, on August 3, 2025, Steelcase Inc., a Michigan corporation (the “Company” or “Steelcase”), entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with HNI Corporation, an Iowa corporation (“HNI”), Geranium Merger Sub I, Inc., a Michigan corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of HNI (“Merger Sub
Inc.”), and Geranium Merger Sub II, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of HNI (“Merger Sub LLC”), providing for, among other things, on the terms and subject to the conditions therein, the
merger of Merger Sub Inc. with and into the Company (the “First Merger”), with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation of the First Merger and a wholly owned subsidiary of HNI, and, immediately after the First Merger, the
merger of the Company with and into Merger Sub LLC (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First Merger, the “Mergers”), with Merger Sub LLC continuing as the surviving entity of the Second Merger and a direct wholly
owned subsidiary of HNI.
In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, HNI filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”) on September 12, 2025, and subsequently amended prior to effectiveness, a registration statement on Form S-4 to register the shares of HNI common stock to be issued in
connection with the Mergers (the “Registration Statement”). The Registration Statement included a joint proxy statement/prospectus constituting a joint proxy statement of HNI and Steelcase and a prospectus of HNI. The Registration
Statement became effective on November 4, 2025. On November 5, 2025, each of HNI and Steelcase filed with the SEC the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus, which HNI and Steelcase first mailed to their respective shareholders on or
about November 5, 2025. Steelcase is filing this Current Report on Form 8-K to update and supplement the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus.
On November 18, 2025, a purported shareholder of Steelcase filed a lawsuit against Steelcase, the board of directors of Steelcase and HNI in the Circuit
Court for the 17th Judicial Circuit, Kent County, Michigan (the “Michigan Action”). The Michigan Action, captioned Drulias v. Armbruster, C.A.
25-21057-CBB, asserts claims under Michigan law for breach of fiduciary duties and/or aiding or abetting the same against the defendants, and for violation of
Michigan’s Uniform Securities Act against HNI. Plaintiff also seeks an injunction to prevent closing of the Steelcase shareholder vote on the First Merger until Steelcase and HNI issue supplemental disclosures. Also on November 18, 2025,
two purported Steelcase shareholders filed separate lawsuits against Steelcase and the board of directors of Steelcase in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in New York County (the “New York Actions,” and, together with the
Michigan Action, the “Actions”). The New York Actions, captioned Marino v. Steelcase, Inc., Case No. 649848/2025, and Thomas v. Steelcase Inc., Case No. 659835/2025, respectively, each assert claims under New York
common law for negligent misrepresentation and concealment, and seek to enjoin the Mergers until supplemental disclosures are made.
While Steelcase
believes that the disclosures in the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus comply fully with all applicable laws and denies the allegations in the Actions described above and believe they are without merit, in order to moot the allegations,
and any potential claims, regarding disclosures, avoid nuisance and possible expense and business delays, and provide additional information to its shareholders, Steelcase has determined voluntarily to supplement certain disclosures in the
definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus related to the Actions’ allegations with the supplemental disclosures set forth below (the “Supplemental Disclosures”). Nothing in the Supplemental Disclosures shall be deemed an
admission of the legal merit, necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein. To the contrary, Steelcase specifically denies all allegations in the Actions that any additional disclosure was or is required
or material.
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
The Supplemental Disclosures should be read in conjunction with the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus, which should be read in its entirety. Defined
terms used in the Supplemental Disclosures that are not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus. All page references in the Supplemental Disclosures are to pages in the definitive joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Paragraph references in the Supplemental Disclosures refer to paragraphs in the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus before any additions or deletions resulting from the Supplemental Disclosures. The information herein
speaks only as of November 25, 2025, unless (and then only to the extent) the information indicates another date applies. For clarity, new text within restated portions of the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus is indicated by
bold typeface and underlining, and deleted passages are indicated by bold strikethrough text.