T. Rowe Price Discloses 6,557,692 Shares of Sweetgreen (6.2%) in 13G
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. reports beneficial ownership of 6,557,692 shares of Sweetgreen Inc. Class A common stock, representing 6.2% of the class. The filing shows T. Rowe Price has sole voting power over 6,220,889 shares and sole dispositive power over 6,495,360 shares, with no shared voting or dispositive power reported. The reporting person is identified as an investment adviser and certifies the securities are held in the ordinary course of business and not for the purpose of changing or influencing control. The filing lists the issuer's principal executive office in Los Angeles and indicates items about group membership and parent subsidiaries are not applicable.
Positive
- Holds a material 6.2% stake in Sweetgreen with 6,557,692 shares reported beneficially owned
- Reports sole voting power over 6,220,889 shares and sole dispositive power over 6,495,360 shares, indicating centralized control of the reported position
- Filed by an investment adviser (IA) and includes a certification that the position is held in the ordinary course of business, indicating a passive intent
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR T. Rowe Price holds a material passive stake of 6.2% in Sweetgreen with substantial sole voting and dispositive powers.
The reported 6,557,692 shares represent a clear >5% holding, which is material to holders because it requires public disclosure. The filing indicates sole voting power over 6,220,889 shares and sole dispositive power over 6,495,360 shares, showing the adviser controls voting and disposition for most of its position. However, the Schedule 13G format and the certification that the securities are held in the ordinary course of business signal a passive position rather than an intent to seek control. Impact to the company is therefore informational and monitoring-focused rather than governance-changing at this stage.
TL;DR The filing documents a significant passive stake but explicitly denies an intent to influence control.
As an investment adviser reporting under the beneficial ownership rules, T. Rowe Price’s statement that the shares are not held to influence control is significant for governance interpretation. The absence of shared voting or dispositive power and the certification language reduce the likelihood this filing presages activist engagement. For governance committees, the key takeaways are the size of the position (6.2%) and the concentration of voting power under one institutional holder, which may merit routine investor relations outreach but does not by itself indicate a change in control dynamics.