Institutional Filing: T. Rowe Price Discloses 3.47M ULS Shares (5.6%)
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. filed a Schedule 13G reporting ownership of 3,465,347 shares of UL Solutions Inc. Class A common stock, representing 5.6% of the class. The filer reports sole voting power over 3,450,122 shares and sole dispositive power over 3,465,347 shares.
The statement certifies these shares were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business and expressly not for the purpose of changing or influencing control of the issuer. No group members or parent/ subsidiary acquisitions are identified in the filing.
Positive
- Material institutional stake: T. Rowe Price reports ownership of 3,465,347 shares, equal to 5.6% of the class.
- Sole voting and dispositive control: The filer reports sole voting power (3,450,122) and sole dispositive power (3,465,347) enabling independent voting and disposition decisions.
- Held in ordinary course: The filing explicitly states the shares are held in the ordinary course of business and not for control purposes.
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: A material institutional passive stake of 5.6% is disclosed; the filing indicates no intent to seek control.
This Schedule 13G shows a significant position by a large investment adviser: 3,465,347 shares representing 5.6% of UL Solutions Class A. The filer reports predominant sole voting and sole dispositive powers, which means T. Rowe Price can vote and sell these shares independently. The certification that the holdings are in the ordinary course and not intended to influence control constrains immediate governance implications, but investors should note the size and active voting capability of the holder.
TL;DR: Ownership exceeds the 5% reporting threshold but the 13G filing signals passive intent rather than an activist or control-seeking posture.
The filing identifies no group members and expressly denies any purpose of changing or influencing control, consistent with a passive investor filing under Schedule 13G. With sole voting power reported over most of the position, the holder retains the ability to exercise votes on governance matters, yet the adviser’s stated intent is passive. This distinction matters for interpreting future proxy dynamics and potential engagement expectations.