STOCK TITAN
  1. Home
  2. Sec-filings
  3. VOYG
  4. [8-K] Voyager Technologies, Inc./DE Reports Material Event

Shareholders of Voyager Technologies (VOYG) approve Delaware–Texas move and 2026 board slate

Filing Impact
(Moderate)
Filing Sentiment
(Neutral)
Form Type
8-K

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Voyager Technologies, Inc. held its 2026 annual stockholder meeting where all management proposals were approved. Common stock representing approximately 67.93% in voting power as of the April 1, 2026 record date was present or represented by proxy. Stockholders elected three Class I directors — Gabe Finke, Marian Joh and Matthew Kuta — to serve until the 2029 annual meeting. They also ratified PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026. Stockholders approved the redomestication of the company from Delaware to Texas by conversion, which is expected to become effective on or about June 15, 2026, and also approved a contingent adjournment proposal that ultimately was not used.

Positive

  • None.

Negative

  • None.

Insights

Shareholders backed all proposals, including a move from Delaware to Texas.

Voyager Technologies, Inc. obtained stockholder approval for three Class I directors, auditor ratification, and a redomestication from Delaware to Texas by conversion. Voting power of approximately 67.93% was represented, indicating solid participation in governance decisions.

The redomestication shifts the company’s legal home to Texas, which can change the governing corporate law framework and potentially affect future charter and governance terms. The move is expected to become effective on or about June 15, 2026, subject to completion of required steps.

The ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 supports continuity in financial reporting oversight. Subsequent company filings after the effective date may outline any updated charter provisions under Texas law.

Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Governance
Results of a shareholder vote on proposals at an annual or special meeting.
Voting power represented 67.93% voting power Common stock at 2026 annual meeting as of April 1, 2026 record date
Director vote – Gabe Finke 105,097,931 For; 2,027,961 Withhold; 13,043,864 Broker Non-Votes Election as Class I director at 2026 annual meeting
Director vote – Marian Joh 101,301,449 For; 5,824,443 Withhold; 13,043,864 Broker Non-Votes Election as Class I director at 2026 annual meeting
Director vote – Matthew Kuta 105,119,984 For; 2,005,908 Withhold; 13,043,864 Broker Non-Votes Election as Class I director at 2026 annual meeting
Auditor ratification vote 120,019,453 For; 112,149 Against; 38,154 Abstain Ratification of PwC for fiscal year ending December 31, 2026
Redomestication vote 98,741,917 For; 8,265,636 Against; 118,339 Abstain; 13,043,864 Broker Non-Votes Approval to redomesticate from Delaware to Texas
Adjournment proposal vote 98,600,810 For; 8,426,781 Against; 98,301 Abstain; 13,043,864 Broker Non-Votes Authority to adjourn meeting for additional proxies on Proposal Three
Redomestication timing On or about June 15, 2026 Expected effective date of Delaware-to-Texas redomestication
redomestication regulatory
"The Company’s stockholders approved the redomestication of the Company from Delaware to Texas by conversion"
Redomestication is a company changing its legal home from one country or state to another by re-registering or swapping shares, much like a person moving their official address to a new jurisdiction. Investors care because that legal home determines tax rules, shareholder rights, regulatory oversight and listing requirements, which can affect dividend treatment, voting power, legal protections and the ease of buying or selling the stock.
independent registered public accounting firm financial
"ratified the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm"
An independent registered public accounting firm is an outside accounting company officially registered with the government regulator to examine and report on a public company's financial records and controls. Investors treat its reports like an impartial inspector’s certificate — they add credibility to financial statements, help spot errors or misleading claims, and reduce the risk that shareholders are relying on unchecked or biased numbers.
broker non-votes financial
"The results of the vote were as follows Nominee | For | Withhold | Broker Non-Votes"
Broker non-votes occur when a brokerage firm is unable to vote on a shareholder’s behalf during a company election or decision because the shareholder has not given specific voting instructions, and the broker is not allowed or chooses not to vote on certain matters. They are important because they can affect the outcome of votes, especially when the results are close, by effectively reducing the total number of votes cast.
emerging growth company regulatory
"405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter). Emerging growth company"
An emerging growth company is a recently public or smaller public firm that qualifies for temporary, lighter regulatory and disclosure rules to reduce the cost and effort of being public. For investors, it means the company may provide less historical financial detail and face fewer reporting requirements than larger firms, so it can grow more quickly but also carries higher uncertainty—like buying a promising early-stage product with fewer user reviews.
Class A common stock financial
"Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote"
Class A common stock is a category of a company’s shares that carries a specific set of ownership rights—most commonly defined voting power and claims on dividends—set out in the company’s charter. For investors it matters because the class determines how much influence you have over corporate decisions, the share’s likely dividend and trading behavior, and how it compares in value to other share classes, like choosing a particular seat with different privileges at the company’s decision-making table.
Class B common stock financial
"each share of Class B common stock is entitled to 15 votes"
A class B common stock is one of multiple types of a company’s ordinary shares that carries specific rights—often different voting power or dividend priority—compared with other classes. For investors it matters because those differences affect how much influence you have over company decisions, the income you might receive, and how freely the shares trade; think of it like owning a car with different keys: some keys let you start the engine and open the trunk, others only unlock the door.
See more from StockTitan in Google Search and AI answers. Adds StockTitan as a preferred source · opens Google
Add on Google
Understanding 8-K Material Events →
Voyager Technologies, Inc./DEFALSE000178806000017880602026-05-292026-05-29

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 29, 2026
Voyager Technologies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware001-4269484-2754888
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
(Commission
File Number)
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
1225 17th Street, Suite 1100
Denver, Colorado 80202
(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (303) 500-6985
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
☐Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
☐Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) 
☐Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) 
☐Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading
Symbol
Name of each exchange
on which registered
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per shareVOYGThe New York Stock Exchange
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company ☒
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐




Item 5.07. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
On May 29, 2026, Voyager Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) held its 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). At the Annual Meeting, shares of the Company’s Class A common stock and Class B common stock (collectively, the “Common Stock”), representing approximately 67.93% in voting power of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock as of the April 1, 2026 record date, were present in person, or by remote communication, or represented by proxy. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote, and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to 15 votes, and the Class A and Class B common stock voted together as a single class on each of the proposals described below. Set forth below are the matters acted upon at the Annual Meeting and the final voting results on each matter, each of which were described in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 2026.
Proposal One: Election of Directors
The Company’s stockholders elected Gabe Finke, Marian Joh and Matthew Kuta as members of the Company’s board of directors as Class I directors to serve until the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2029 and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The results of the vote were as follows:
NomineeForWithholdBroker Non-Votes
Gabe Finke105,097,9312,027,96113,043,864
Marian Joh101,301,4495,824,44313,043,864
Matthew Kuta105,119,9842,005,90813,043,864
Proposal Two: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Company’s stockholders ratified the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026. The results of the vote were as follows:
ForAgainstAbstainBroker Non-Votes
120,019,453112,14938,154—
Proposal Three: Redomestication of the Company from Delaware to Texas
The Company’s stockholders approved the redomestication of the Company from Delaware to Texas by conversion (the “Redomestication”). The results of the vote were as follows:
ForAgainstAbstainBroker Non-Votes
98,741,9178,265,636118,33913,043,864
The Company expects the Redomestication to become effective on or about June 15, 2026.
Proposal Four: Adjournment of Annual Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies for Proposal 3
The Company’s stockholders approved the adjournment of the annual meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there were not sufficient votes at the time of the Annual Meeting to approve Proposal Three, however as Proposal Three was approved, it was not necessary to adjourn the Annual Meeting. The results of the vote were as follows:
ForAgainstAbstainBroker Non-Votes
98,600,8108,426,78198,30113,043,864


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
VOYAGER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Date: June 1, 2026
By:
/s/ Dylan Taylor
Name:
Dylan Taylor
Title:
Chief Executive Officer

Source: View Original Filing on SEC EDGAR

FAQ

What did Voyager Technologies (VOYG) shareholders vote on at the 2026 annual meeting?

Shareholders approved three key items: election of three Class I directors, ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor for 2026, and redomestication of Voyager Technologies from Delaware to Texas by conversion, plus a backup adjournment proposal that ultimately was not used.

Were Voyager Technologies (VOYG) director nominees elected at the 2026 annual meeting?

Yes, Gabe Finke, Marian Joh and Matthew Kuta were elected as Class I directors. They will serve until the 2029 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, reflecting stockholder support for the existing board slate.

Did Voyager Technologies (VOYG) shareholders approve the move from Delaware to Texas?

Yes, stockholders approved the redomestication of Voyager Technologies from Delaware to Texas by conversion. The company expects this redomestication to become effective on or about June 15, 2026, following completion of the required implementation steps and related formalities.

Which auditor did Voyager Technologies (VOYG) shareholders ratify for fiscal 2026?

Stockholders ratified PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Voyager Technologies’ independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026. This ratification supports continuity in external audit oversight of the company’s financial statements and related reporting processes.

How much voting power was represented at Voyager Technologies’ 2026 annual meeting?

Shares of Class A and Class B common stock representing approximately 67.93% in voting power of outstanding common stock as of April 1, 2026 were present or represented. This level of participation provided the quorum needed to approve the proposals presented at the meeting.

What was the purpose of Voyager Technologies’ adjournment proposal at the 2026 meeting?

The adjournment proposal allowed the company to postpone the meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies for the redomestication vote. Stockholders approved this authority, but it was not needed because the redomestication proposal itself received sufficient votes for approval.

Filing Exhibits & Attachments

3 documents

Other Documents