[144] Vistra Corp. SEC Filing
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Form 144 notice for Vistra Corp. (VST) documents a proposed sale of 43,074 common shares through Fidelity Brokerage Services on 09/11/2025 with an aggregate market value of $8,991,625.76. The filing shows the shares were acquired upon exercise of options: 40,909 shares from an option granted 10/11/2016 and 2,165 shares from an option granted 04/09/2018; payment is listed as cash. The filer reported a related sale on 09/10/2025 of 19,592 shares for $3,933,635.75. The filing includes the standard representation about absence of undisclosed material information and mentions reliance on Rule 10b5-1 if applicable. No other financial results or operational details are provided in this notice.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: Insider option exercises and planned sales disclosed; transaction sizes are documented but not clearly material to company valuation.
The filing reports option-derived share sales totaling 43,074 shares to be sold on 09/11/2025 via a broker, at an aggregate market value of $8,991,625.76, following a sale of 19,592 shares on 09/10/2025 for $3,933,635.75. The notice provides acquisition dates tied to option grants (10/11/2016 and 04/09/2018) and indicates cash payment. For investors, these are routine Rule 144 disclosures showing liquidity events by an insider or person subject to Rule 144 aggregation; the filing does not include any company operational or financial performance information to change valuation assumptions.
TL;DR: Proper Rule 144 procedure appears followed; the filing includes the required representations and transaction details.
The notice lists the broker, share counts, acquisition mechanics (option exercises), and prior recent sale, and it includes the signer’s certification regarding material nonpublic information and potential 10b5-1 plan reference. This fulfills disclosure protocol for reportable insider sales. The form does not state the filer’s formal relationship to the issuer, so governance context (insider level, officer vs. beneficial owner) is not fully specified in this document.