Nano Dimension Financials
This page shows Nano Dimension (NNDM) financial statements, including the income statement, balance sheet, cash flow statement, and key financial ratios. View 9 years of annual fundamentals and quarterly data, with year-over-year growth rates and compound annual growth rates (CAGR). All figures are derived from SEC filings (10-K and 10-Q reports).
FY2025 sales acceleration came with a lower-margin mix, so scale did not translate into operating leverage.
Revenue surged to$102.4M while gross margin slipped to33.5% , indicating the bigger sales base arrived in a less profitable mix rather than creating scale benefits. At the same time, net loss reached-$293.3M versus operating cash outflow of-$70.3M , so FY2025's income-statement deterioration was much heavier than the actual cash drain.
The spending mix changed in a telling way: R&D fell to
Cash of
Financial Health Signals
Scored against emerging companies for FY2025. Each of the six dimensions is a percentile rank within that peer group; the overall is their average, with missing dimensions counted as zero out of six. A high score means strong standing among peers, not absolute cross-industry strength. How this score is calculated →
Health score ≠ stock price. This rates the quality of Nano Dimension's business: profitability, growth, balance sheet strength. It doesn't tell you whether the stock is a good buy at today's price. Not financial advice. Use it alongside valuation analysis and your own research.
Nano Dimension passes 2 of 7 computable financial strength tests (2 of the nine could not be computed from available data). 1 of 4 profitability signals pass, no leverage/liquidity signals pass (rising debt, declining liquidity, or share dilution), 1 of 2 efficiency signals pass.
For every $1 of reported earnings, Nano Dimension generates $0.24 in operating cash flow (-$70.3M OCF vs -$293.3M net income). This low ratio suggests earnings are primarily driven by accounting accruals rather than cash generation, which may not be sustainable.
Nano Dimension earns $-1264.2 in operating income for every $1 of interest expense (-$140.3M vs $111K). This narrow margin raises concern about the company's ability to service its debt if operating income declines.
Key Financial Metrics
Earnings & Revenue
Nano Dimension generated $102.4M in revenue in fiscal year 2025. This represents an increase of 77.3% from the prior year.
Nano Dimension's EBITDA was -$119.9M in fiscal year 2025, measuring earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. This represents a decrease of 37.9% from the prior year.
Nano Dimension reported -$293.3M in net income in fiscal year 2025. This represents a decrease of 196.8% from the prior year.
Nano Dimension earned $-1.36 per diluted share (EPS) in fiscal year 2025. This represents a decrease of 202.2% from the prior year.
Cash & Balance Sheet
Nano Dimension generated -$71.3M in free cash flow in fiscal year 2025, representing cash available after capex. This represents a decrease of 238.0% from the prior year.
Nano Dimension held $204.7M in cash against $0 in long-term debt as of fiscal year 2025.
Margins & Returns
Nano Dimension's gross margin was 33.5% in fiscal year 2025, indicating the percentage of revenue retained after direct costs. This is down 9.6 percentage points from the prior year.
Nano Dimension's operating margin was -137.0% in fiscal year 2025, reflecting core business profitability. This is up 18.1 percentage points from the prior year.
Nano Dimension's net profit margin was -286.3% in fiscal year 2025, showing the share of revenue converted to profit. This is down 115.3 percentage points from the prior year.
Nano Dimension's ROE was -53.1% in fiscal year 2025, measuring profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity. This is down 41.6 percentage points from the prior year.
Capital Allocation
Nano Dimension invested $30.1M in research and development in fiscal year 2025. This represents a decrease of 24.0% from the prior year.
Nano Dimension invested $1.1M in capex in fiscal year 2025, funding long-term assets and infrastructure. This represents a decrease of 51.5% from the prior year.
NNDM Income Statement
| Metric | Q1'26 | Q4'25 | Q1'25 | Q4'24 | Q4'23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.7M | N/A | $14.4M | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Revenue | $17.6M | N/A | $8.6M | N/A | N/A |
| Gross Profit | $12.1M | N/A | $5.8M | N/A | N/A |
| R&D Expenses | $8.2M | N/A | $5.9M | N/A | N/A |
| SG&A Expenses | $15.2M | N/A | $5.7M | N/A | N/A |
| Operating Income | -$64.5M | N/A | -$41.9M | N/A | N/A |
| Interest Expense | $246K | N/A | $1.7M | N/A | N/A |
| Income Tax | $0 | N/A | $23K | N/A | N/A |
| Net Income | -$69.7M | N/A | -$25.3M | N/A | N/A |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.34 | N/A | $-0.12 | N/A | N/A |
NNDM Balance Sheet
| Metric | Q1'26 | Q4'25 | Q1'25 | Q4'24 | Q4'23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $573.2M-10.2% | $638.2M | N/A | $902.5M-15.2% | $1.1B |
| Current Assets | $505.4M-3.9% | $525.8M | N/A | $789.3M-11.7% | $894.0M |
| Cash & Equivalents | $355.3M+73.6% | $204.7M-58.0% | $487.4M+53.7% | $317.2M+2.5% | $309.6M |
| Inventory | $31.7M-3.6% | $32.9M | N/A | $16.9M-8.1% | $18.4M |
| Accounts Receivable | N/A | N/A | N/A | $9.1M-28.1% | $12.7M |
| Goodwill | $0-100.0% | $40.4M0.0% | $40.4M | $0 | N/A |
| Total Liabilities | $87.8M+1.8% | $86.2M | N/A | $41.8M-8.6% | $45.7M |
| Current Liabilities | $56.1M+6.9% | $52.5M | N/A | $30.1M-8.8% | $33.0M |
| Long-Term Debt | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Total Equity | $485.4M-12.1% | $552.0M-33.9% | $835.0M-2.9% | $860.0M-15.5% | $1.0B |
| Retained Earnings | N/A | N/A | N/A | -$677.7M-17.1% | -$578.8M |
NNDM Cash Flow Statement
| Metric | Q1'26 | Q4'25 | Q1'25 | Q4'24 | Q4'23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$7.1M | N/A | -$7.5M | N/A | N/A |
| Capital Expenditures | $167K | N/A | $295K | N/A | N/A |
| Free Cash Flow | -$7.2M | N/A | -$7.8M | N/A | N/A |
| Investing Cash Flow | $157.5M | N/A | $177.1M | N/A | N/A |
| Financing Cash Flow | -$41K | N/A | -$35K | N/A | N/A |
| Dividends Paid | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Share Buybacks | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
NNDM Financial Ratios
| Metric | Q1'26 | Q4'25 | Q1'25 | Q4'24 | Q4'23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 40.8% | N/A | 40.6% | N/A | N/A |
| Operating Margin | -217.0% | N/A | -290.9% | N/A | N/A |
| Net Margin | -234.4% | N/A | -175.8% | N/A | N/A |
| Return on Equity | -14.3% | N/A | -3.0% | N/A | N/A |
| Return on Assets | -12.2% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Current Ratio | 9.01-1.0 | 10.02 | N/A | 26.22-0.9 | 27.07 |
| Debt-to-Equity | 0.18+0.0 | 0.16 | N/A | 0.050.0 | 0.04 |
| FCF Margin | -24.4% | N/A | -54.0% | N/A | N/A |
Similar Companies
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Nano Dimension's annual revenue?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) reported $102.4M in total revenue for fiscal year 2025. This represents a 77.3% change compared to the previous fiscal year. Revenue measures the total income earned from the company's primary business operations before any expenses are deducted.
How fast is Nano Dimension's revenue growing?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) revenue grew by 77.3% year-over-year, from $57.8M to $102.4M in fiscal year 2025.
Is Nano Dimension profitable?
No, Nano Dimension (NNDM) reported a net income of -$293.3M in fiscal year 2025, with a net profit margin of -286.3%.
What is Nano Dimension's EBITDA?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) had EBITDA of -$119.9M in fiscal year 2025, measuring earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.
What is Nano Dimension's gross margin?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) had a gross margin of 33.5% in fiscal year 2025, indicating the percentage of revenue retained after direct costs of goods sold.
What is Nano Dimension's operating margin?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) had an operating margin of -137.0% in fiscal year 2025, reflecting the profitability of core business operations before interest and taxes.
What is Nano Dimension's net profit margin?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) had a net profit margin of -286.3% in fiscal year 2025, representing the share of revenue converted into profit after all expenses.
What is Nano Dimension's return on equity (ROE)?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) has a return on equity of -53.1% for fiscal year 2025, measuring how efficiently the company generates profit from shareholder equity.
What is Nano Dimension's free cash flow?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) generated -$71.3M in free cash flow during fiscal year 2025. This represents a -238.0% change compared to the previous fiscal year. Free cash flow represents the cash a company generates after accounting for capital expenditures, and is widely used to assess financial flexibility and shareholder value.
What is Nano Dimension's operating cash flow?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) generated -$70.3M in operating cash flow during fiscal year 2025, representing cash generated from core business activities.
What are Nano Dimension's total assets?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) had $638.2M in total assets as of fiscal year 2025, including both current and long-term assets.
What are Nano Dimension's capital expenditures?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) invested $1.1M in capital expenditures during fiscal year 2025, funding long-term assets and infrastructure.
How much does Nano Dimension spend on research and development?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) invested $30.1M in research and development during fiscal year 2025.
What is Nano Dimension's current ratio?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) had a current ratio of 10.02 as of fiscal year 2025, which is generally considered healthy.
What is Nano Dimension's debt-to-equity ratio?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) had a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16 as of fiscal year 2025, measuring the company's financial leverage by comparing total debt to shareholder equity.
What is Nano Dimension's return on assets (ROA)?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) had a return on assets of -46.0% for fiscal year 2025, measuring how efficiently the company uses its assets to generate profit.
What is Nano Dimension's cash runway?
Based on fiscal year 2025 data, Nano Dimension (NNDM) had $204.7M in cash against an annual operating cash burn of $70.3M. This gives an estimated cash runway of approximately 35 months at the current burn rate. Cash runway measures how long a company can continue operating before running out of cash, assuming no additional funding.
What is Nano Dimension's Piotroski F-Score?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) has a Piotroski F-Score of 2 out of 7 computable signals; 2 of the nine could not be computed from available data, so the full-scale strength rating is not shown. The F-Score evaluates nine binary signals across profitability (positive ROA, positive cash flow, improving ROA, earnings quality), leverage (decreasing debt, improving liquidity, no share dilution), and operating efficiency (improving gross margin, improving asset turnover). Scores of 7 to 9 indicate strong and improving fundamentals. Learn more in our complete guide to financial health indicators.
Are Nano Dimension's earnings high quality?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) has an earnings quality ratio of 0.24x, considered low quality (accrual-driven). This ratio compares operating cash flow to net income. A ratio above 1.0x means the company generates more cash than its reported earnings, indicating sustainable, cash-backed profits. Ratios below 1.0x suggest earnings rely on accounting accruals rather than actual cash generation. Learn more in our complete guide to financial health indicators.
Can Nano Dimension cover its interest payments?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) has an interest coverage ratio of -1264.2x, meaning it can struggle to cover its interest obligations. This ratio divides operating income by interest expense. Ratios above 5x indicate strong debt-servicing ability, while ratios below 2x suggest the company may face difficulty meeting interest payments if earnings decline. Learn more in our complete guide to financial health indicators.
How financially healthy is Nano Dimension?
Nano Dimension (NNDM) scores 53 out of 100 on our Financial Health Score, indicating moderate standing within its emerging companies peer group. The score is a 0-100 composite of six dimensions (Cash Runway, Dilution, R&D Intensity, Revenue Progress, Burn Trend, Balance Sheet), each ranked as a percentile relative to companies in the same scoring family (banks against banks, REITs against REITs, and so on) rather than across all industries. It rates the quality of the business, not whether the stock is fairly priced, and is not financial advice. Learn more in our complete guide to financial health indicators.