AB InBev Reports Third Quarter 2025 Results
Consistent execution of our strategy delivered an EBITDA increase of

Regulated and inside information1
“Driven by the momentum of our megabrands and our innovation in balanced choices and Beyond Beer, our business delivered continued top- and bottom-line growth, even as we navigated a dynamic consumer environment. Given the progress we have made on our deleveraging and solid year-to-date financial results we have announced a new
Revenue
+
Revenue increased by
Reported revenue increased by
Volumes
-
Volumes declined by
Volumes declined by
|
Normalized EBITDA
+
Normalized EBITDA increased by
Underlying Profit
1
Underlying Profit was 1
Reported profit attributable to equity holders of AB InBev was 1
Underlying EPS
Underlying EPS increased by
On a constant currency basis, Underlying EPS increased by |
Capital Allocation
The AB InBev Board of Directors has approved a |
|
| 1The enclosed information constitutes inside information as defined in Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on market abuse, and regulated information as defined in the Belgian Royal Decree of 14 November 2007 regarding the duties of issuers of financial instruments which have been admitted for trading on a regulated market. For important disclaimers and notes on the basis of preparation, please refer to page 15. |
Management comments
Consistent execution of our strategy delivered an EBITDA increase of
The consistent execution of our strategy and our disciplined choices in revenue and cost management drove resilient financial performance. Megabrand momentum, innovation in balanced choices and acceleration of our Beyond Beer portfolio drove continued top- and bottom-line growth and increased portfolio brand power. We estimate that we gained or maintained share in the majority of our markets, including the US,
Revenue per hl increased by
Some key highlights from our performance this quarter include the following: continued momentum of our no-alcohol beer and Beyond Beer portfolios which both grew revenue by
Progressing our strategic priorities
We continue to execute on and invest in three key strategic pillars to deliver consistent growth and long-term value creation.
(1) Lead and grow the category:
Our portfolio brand power grew in 3Q25 driven by consumer-centric innovation, increased marketing effectiveness and focused investment. In addition, we estimate that we gained or maintained share in the majority of our markets.
(2) Digitize and monetize our ecosystem:
BEES Marketplace captured
(3) Optimize our business:
The AB InBev Board of Directors has approved a new
(1) Lead and grow the category
Driven by performance across each of the category expansion levers, consumer participation with our portfolio was estimated to have remained stable across our key markets in 3Q25, with participation increases for our megabrands and no-alcohol beer portfolio.
-
Core Superiority: Revenue of our mainstream portfolio increased by
0.8% in 3Q25, driven by high-single digit growth inColombia and mid-single digit growth inSouth Africa . -
Premiumization: In the US, Michelob Ultra’s momentum continued in 3Q25, becoming the #1 brand by volume in the industry year-to-date. Corona led our premium performance globally, increasing revenue by
6.3% outside ofMexico . Revenue growth of our overall above core beer portfolio was flattish, constrained by performance inChina . -
Balanced Choices: Growth in 3Q25 was driven by our no-alcohol beer portfolio which delivered a
27% revenue increase, successfully compounding on the mid-thirties revenue increase in 3Q24 following Olympic Games related activations. No-alcohol beer performance was led by Corona Cero which grew volumes in the low-forties. Our overall balanced choices portfolio of low carb, sugar free, gluten free and no-alcohol beer brands delivered a revenue increase of6.5% . -
Beyond Beer: Growth of our Beyond Beer portfolio accelerated in 3Q25, increasing revenue by
27% , led by the triple-digit growth of Cutwater in the US.
(2) Digitize and monetize our ecosystem
-
Digitizing our relationships with more than 6 million customers globally: As of 30 September 2025, BEES was live in 29 markets with approximately
70% of our revenues captured through B2B digital platforms. In 3Q25, BEES captured13.3 billion USD in GMV, growth of11% versus 3Q24. -
Monetizing our route-to-market; approaching
1 billion USD in quarterly GMV: BEES Marketplace GMV growth accelerated in 3Q25, growing by66% versus 3Q24 to reach935 million USD from sales of third-party products. -
Leading the way in DTC solutions: Our omnichannel DTC ecosystem of digital and physical products generated revenue of approximately
325 million USD in 3Q25. Our DTC megabrands, Zé Delivery, TaDa Delivery and PerfectDraft, generated 17.9 million e-commerce orders and delivered138 million USD in revenue this quarter, growth of4% versus 3Q24.
(3) Optimize our business
-
Maximizing value creation: We are committed to driving long-term shareholder value creation through a combination of profitable growth and disciplined capital allocation choices. Given the progress we have made on our deleveraging and our solid year-to-date financial results, the AB InBev Board of Directors has approved a
6 billion USD share buyback program to be executed within the next 24 months, and a0.15 EUR per share interim dividend. We continue to proactively manage our debt portfolio and have announced today the redemption of approximately2 billion USD of outstanding bonds. -
Advancing our sustainability priorities: In Climate Action, our Scopes 1 and 2 emissions per hectoliter of production was 4.22 kgCO2e/hl in 9M25, a reduction of
48% versus our 2017 baseline. In Water Stewardship, our water use efficiency ratio improved to 2.38 hl per hl in 9M25 versus 2.47 hl per hl in 9M24.
Delivering reliable compounding growth
In the first 9 months of this year, our business delivered an EBITDA increase of
2025 Outlook
(i) Overall Performance: We expect our EBITDA to grow in line with our medium-term outlook of between 4
(ii) Net Finance Costs: Net pension interest expenses and accretion expenses are expected to be in the range of 190 to
(iii) Effective Tax Rate (ETR): We expect the normalized ETR in FY25 to be in the range of
(iv) Net Capital Expenditure: We expect net capital expenditure of between 3.5 and
Figure 1. Consolidated performance |
|||||||||
in USD Mio, except EPS in USD per share and Volumes in thousand hls |
3Q24 |
3Q25 |
Organic |
||||||
growth |
|||||||||
Volumes |
148 039 |
|
142 319 |
|
(3.7 |
)% |
|||
Beer |
128 534 |
|
123 757 |
|
(3.9 |
)% |
|||
Non-Beer |
19 505 |
|
18 562 |
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|||
Revenue |
15 046 |
|
15 133 |
|
0.9 |
% |
|||
Gross profit |
8 366 |
|
8 537 |
|
2.0 |
% |
|||
Gross margin |
55.6 |
% |
56.4 |
% |
58bps |
||||
Normalized EBITDA |
5 424 |
|
5 594 |
|
3.3 |
% |
|||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
36.0 |
% |
37.0 |
% |
85bps |
||||
Normalized EBIT |
4 091 |
|
4 205 |
|
3.2 |
% |
|||
Normalized EBIT margin |
27.2 |
% |
27.8 |
% |
61bps |
||||
|
|||||||||
Profit attributable to equity holders of AB InBev |
2 071 |
|
1 054 |
|
|||||
Underlying Profit |
1 971 |
|
1 970 |
|
|||||
|
|||||||||
Basic EPS |
1.03 |
|
0.53 |
|
|||||
Underlying EPS |
0.98 |
|
0.99 |
|
|
||||
9M24 |
9M25 |
Organic |
|||||||
growth |
|||||||||
Volumes |
433 877 |
|
421 934 |
|
(2.6 |
)% |
|||
Beer |
375 301 |
|
365 147 |
|
(2.9 |
)% |
|||
Non-Beer |
58 575 |
|
56 787 |
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|||
Revenue |
44 927 |
|
43 764 |
|
1.8 |
% |
|||
Gross profit |
24 827 |
|
24 566 |
|
3.7 |
% |
|||
Gross margin |
55.3 |
% |
56.1 |
% |
104bps |
||||
Normalized EBITDA |
15 712 |
|
15 750 |
|
5.8 |
% |
|||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
35.0 |
% |
36.0 |
% |
138bps |
||||
Normalized EBIT |
11 638 |
|
11 805 |
|
7.8 |
% |
|||
Normalized EBIT margin |
25.9 |
% |
27.0 |
% |
152bps |
||||
|
|||||||||
Profit attributable to equity holders of AB InBev |
4 635 |
|
4 878 |
|
|||||
Underlying Profit |
5 291 |
|
5 526 |
|
|||||
|
|||||||||
Basic EPS |
2.31 |
|
2.46 |
|
|||||
Underlying EPS |
2.64 |
|
2.78 |
|
|
||||
Figure 2. Volumes |
||||||||||||||||
in thousand hls |
3Q24 |
Scope |
Organic |
3Q25 |
Organic growth |
|||||||||||
growth |
Total |
Beer |
||||||||||||||
|
22 764 |
(271 |
) |
(597 |
) |
21 896 |
(2.7 |
)% |
(4.0 |
)% |
||||||
Middle |
37 107 |
(51 |
) |
(141 |
) |
36 915 |
(0.4 |
)% |
(0.7 |
)% |
||||||
|
39 502 |
- |
|
(2 580 |
) |
36 922 |
(6.5 |
)% |
(6.6 |
)% |
||||||
EMEA |
24 039 |
85 |
|
25 |
|
24 149 |
0.1 |
% |
0.4 |
% |
||||||
|
24 514 |
- |
|
(2 213 |
) |
22 301 |
(9.0 |
)% |
(9.1 |
)% |
||||||
Global Export and Holding Companies |
112 |
- |
|
23 |
|
136 |
20.6 |
% |
20.6 |
% |
||||||
AB InBev Worldwide |
148 039 |
(237 |
) |
(5 483 |
) |
142 319 |
(3.7 |
)% |
(3.9 |
)% |
||||||
9M24 |
Scope |
Organic |
9M25 |
Organic growth |
||||||||||||
growth |
Total |
Beer |
||||||||||||||
|
66 756 |
(745 |
) |
(1 896 |
) |
64 115 |
(2.9 |
)% |
(3.5 |
)% |
||||||
Middle |
111 179 |
(51 |
) |
(310 |
) |
110 818 |
(0.3 |
)% |
(0.2 |
)% |
||||||
|
115 818 |
- |
|
(3 806 |
) |
112 011 |
(3.3 |
)% |
(3.9 |
)% |
||||||
EMEA |
68 921 |
162 |
|
(10 |
) |
69 073 |
(0.0 |
)% |
(0.1 |
)% |
||||||
|
70 958 |
(93 |
) |
(5 200 |
) |
65 665 |
(7.3 |
)% |
(7.3 |
)% |
||||||
Global Export and Holding Companies |
244 |
(9 |
) |
16 |
|
252 |
6.9 |
% |
6.9 |
% |
||||||
AB InBev Worldwide |
433 877 |
(736 |
) |
(11 207 |
) |
421 934 |
(2.6 |
)% |
(2.9 |
)% |
||||||
Key Markets Performance
-
Operating performance:
-
3Q25: Revenue declined by
0.8% with revenue per hl increasing by2.0% driven by revenue management initiatives and premiumization. Sales-to-retailers (STRs) declined by2.5% , estimated to have outperformed a soft industry. Sales-to-wholesalers (STWs) declined by2.7% . EBITDA increased by0.4% with a margin improvement of 42bps, driven by productivity initiatives, even as we continued to increase our marketing investments to fuel momentum. -
9M25: Revenue declined by
1.2% , with revenue per hl increasing by1.8% . STRs declined by3.1% and STWs were down by3.0% , and we expect our STRs and STWs to converge on a full year basis. EBITDA increased by1.1% with a margin improvement of 80bps.
-
3Q25: Revenue declined by
- Commercial highlights: Consistent execution and increased portfolio brand power drove our momentum with our business continuing to gain market share of the beer industry and the spirits-based ready-to-drink category, according to Circana. Our beer performance was led by Michelob Ultra, the #1 volume share gainer and now the leading brand by volume in the industry year-to-date, and Busch Light, which continued to be the #2 volume share gainer in the industry. We are the leaders in no-alcohol beer, with our portfolio growing revenue by double-digits, led by Michelob Ultra Zero which is the fastest growing no-alcohol beer brand in the industry year-to-date. In Beyond Beer, our portfolio momentum accelerated, with revenue growth in the mid-forties, led by Cutwater which grew revenue in the triple digits and was the #1 share gaining brand in the total spirits industry in August and September.
-
Operating performance:
- 3Q25: Revenue increased by low-single digits, with mid-single digit revenue per hl growth driven by revenue management initiatives. Volumes decreased by low-single digits, underperforming the industry which was negatively impacted by a soft consumer environment and unseasonable weather. Our volumes improved sequentially through the quarter, both returning to growth and gaining market share in August and September. Disciplined revenue management choices and productivity initiatives partially offset transactional FX headwinds to deliver slight EBITDA growth.
- 9M25: Revenue grew by mid-single digits with revenue per hl growth of mid-single digits and flattish volumes, in-line with the industry. EBITDA grew by mid-single digits with margin expansion.
-
Commercial highlights: Our performance was led by our above core beer portfolio, which grew revenue by low-single digits driven by Modelo and Pacifico. We are leading the growth in no-alcohol beer, with Corona Cero growing volume by strong double-digits and Modelo Cero, an innovation launch earlier this year, already the #4 no-alcohol beer in the industry. We continue to progress our digital initiatives, with BEES Marketplace growing GMV by
26% versus 3Q24 and our digital DTC platform, TaDa Delivery, fulfilling 3.2 million orders year-to-date, a5% increase versus 9M24.
-
Operating performance:
- 3Q25: Revenue increased by low-teens with high-single digit revenue per hl growth, driven by revenue management initiatives. Volumes grew by low-single digits, with our portfolio estimated to have gained share of alcohol beverages. EBITDA grew by mid-single digits.
- 9M25: Revenue grew by high-single digits with high-single digit revenue per hl growth. Volumes increased by low-single digits. EBITDA grew by high-single digits with margin expansion.
- Commercial highlights: The beer industry continued to grow and gain share of alcohol beverages this quarter according to our estimates. Our premium and super premium brands led our performance, delivering mid-teens volume growth and driving record high third quarter volumes. Our mainstream beer portfolio continued to grow, delivering low-single digit volume growth.
-
Operating performance:
-
3Q25: Revenue declined by
1.9% with revenue per hl growth of6.5% driven by revenue management initiatives and premiumization. Total volumes declined by7.9% , with beer volume decreasing by7.7% , estimated to have outperformed a soft industry, and non-beer volumes decreasing by8.5% , with both industries impacted by unseasonable weather and a soft consumer environment. EBITDA increased by0.1% with margin expansion of 68bps as disciplined revenue management choices and productivity initiatives more than offset transactional FX headwinds. -
9M25: Revenue grew by
0.4% with revenue per hl growth of4.9% . Total volumes declined by4.3% with beer volumes declining by5.3% and non-beer volumes declining by1.6% . EBITDA increased by6.5% with margin expansion of 195bps.
-
3Q25: Revenue declined by
-
Commercial highlights: Our premium and super premium beer brands led our performance, delivering mid-teens volume growth and gaining share of the segment to now be the #1 premium brewer in the industry year-to-date, according to Nielsen. The market share trend of our mainstream portfolio improved sequentially through the quarter, however volumes were negatively impacted by a soft industry. Our portfolio of balanced choices drove incremental growth with volumes of our no-alcohol beer brands increasing by low-twenties and Stella Artois Gluten Free more than doubling. In non-beer, our low- and no-sugar portfolio continued to outperform, delivering low-twenties volume growth. We continue to progress our digital initiatives, with BEES Marketplace growing GMV by
88% versus 3Q24, and our digital DTC platform, Zé Delivery, reaching 5.4 million monthly active users.
-
Operating performance:
- 3Q25: Revenue declined by low-single digits with flattish revenue per hl. Volumes were flattish, estimated to have outperformed a soft industry in 5 of our 6 key markets. EBITDA grew by low-single digits with margin recovery.
- 9M25: Revenue declined by low-single digits with slight revenue per hl growth driven by continued premiumization. Volume declined by low-single digits, estimated to have gained or maintained market share in all 6 of our key markets. EBITDA grew by mid-single digits with margin recovery.
-
Commercial highlights: Market share gains and the continued premiumization of our portfolio drove flattish volumes, with our premium and super premium brands making up approximately
60% of our 3Q25 revenue. Our performance this quarter was driven by our megabrands, led by Corona, which delivered double-digit volume growth, and Stella Artois, which effectively activated the Perfect Serve campaign at the Wimbledon tennis tournament. The momentum of our no-alcohol beer portfolio continued, led by Corona Cero with mid-twenties volume growth, successfully compounding on the triple digit growth in 3Q24 following the Olympic Games.
-
Operating performance:
- 3Q25: Revenue increased by mid-single digits with slight revenue per hl growth. Volumes grew by mid-single digits, supported by shipment phasing ahead of our October price increase, and estimated to have maintained share of beer and gained share of Beyond Beer. EBITDA grew by high-single digits with margin expansion.
- 9M25: Revenue increased by mid-single digits with revenue per hl growth of low-single digits. Volumes grew by low-single digits, estimated to have gained share in both beer and Beyond Beer. EBITDA grew by mid-single digits with margin expansion.
- Commercial highlights: The beer industry continued to grow and gain share of alcohol beverages this quarter according to our estimates. Our performance was led by our core brands, which grew volumes by high-single digits driven by Carling Black Label. The momentum of our premium and super premium beer portfolio continued, with revenue growth of mid-single digits led by Stella Artois. In Beyond Beer, our portfolio grew volumes by mid-teens led by Flying Fish, Brutal Fruit and Redd’s.
-
Operating performance:
-
3Q25: Volumes declined by
11.4% , underperforming the industry according to our estimates, with our performance impacted by continued weakness in our key regions and channels and inventory management. Revenue per hl declined by4.3% , impacted by increased investments to expand our in-home presence and negative brand mix, resulting in a revenue decline of15.2% . EBITDA declined by16.9% as productivity initiatives partially offset the impact of operational deleverage. -
9M25: Revenue declined by
11.3% with revenue per hl declining by2.2% and volumes decreasing by9.3% . EBITDA declined by11.8% .
-
3Q25: Volumes declined by
- Commercial highlights: Industry volumes were estimated to have declined by low-single digits versus 3Q24, with a growing in-home channel outweighed by a soft on-premise. Our top priorities are to rebuild momentum and reignite growth. To achieve this, we are investing in our portfolio, innovation and mega platform activations, enhancing our route to market in the in-home channel, and expanding our footprint through targeted geographic expansion. As we move forward, our innovations will include the national rollout of Budweiser Magnum and launch of new packages for Budweiser and Corona such as the 1 liter can and a full-open lid can to bring the iconic lime ritual into the in-home occasion.
Highlights from our other markets
-
Canada : Revenue was flattish this quarter with low-single digit revenue per hl growth. Our volumes outperformed the industry in both beer and Beyond Beer according to our estimates, declining by low-single digits. Our beer performance was led by Michelob Ultra, Busch and Corona which were three of the top five volume share gainers in the industry. In Beyond Beer, our market share gains were led by Cutwater and Mike’s Hard Lemonade. -
Peru : Revenue grew by mid-single digits in 3Q25 with mid-single digit revenue per hl growth, driven by revenue management initiatives. Volumes grew by low-single digits, with our performance led by our above core beer and non-beer portfolios which both grew volumes in the teens. -
Ecuador : Revenue grew by low-teens in 3Q25 with volumes increasing by high-single digits, cycling a soft industry in 3Q24. Growth was led by our above core beer brands which increased volume by strong double-digits. -
Argentina : Volume declined by low-single digits in 3Q25, as overall consumer demand continued to be impacted by inflationary pressures. Since 1Q24, the definition of organic revenue growth inArgentina has been amended to cap the price growth to a maximum of2% per month. Revenue grew by high-single digits on this basis. -
Africa excludingSouth Africa : InNigeria , revenue grew by mid-single digits in 3Q25, driven by revenue management initiatives in a highly inflationary environment. Beer volumes declined by low-twenties, estimated to have underperformed the industry which was impacted by a soft consumer environment. In our other markets inAfrica , revenue grew in aggregate by low-teens and volumes were flattish as we cycled a strong performance in 3Q24. -
South Korea : Revenue increased by mid-single digits in 3Q25 with mid-single digit revenue per hl growth driven by revenue management initiatives. Volumes were flattish, estimated to have outperformed the industry in both the on-premise and in-home channels, with top-line performance led by our megabrand Cass.
Consolidated Income Statement
Figure 3. Consolidated income statement |
|||||||||
in USD Mio |
3Q24 |
3Q25 |
Organic |
||||||
growth |
|||||||||
Revenue |
15 046 |
|
15 133 |
|
0.9 |
% |
|||
Cost of sales |
(6 680 |
) |
(6 596 |
) |
0.4 |
% |
|||
Gross profit |
8 366 |
|
8 537 |
|
2.0 |
% |
|||
SG&A |
(4 490 |
) |
(4 535 |
) |
(0.5 |
)% |
|||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
215 |
|
203 |
|
(5.4 |
)% |
|||
Normalized EBIT |
4 091 |
|
4 205 |
|
3.2 |
% |
|||
Non-underlying items above EBIT |
(125 |
) |
55 |
|
|||||
Net finance income/(expense) |
(1 043 |
) |
(1 165 |
) |
|||||
Non-underlying net finance income/(expense) |
236 |
|
(947 |
) |
|||||
Share of results of associates |
89 |
|
110 |
|
|||||
Non-underlying share of results of associates |
- |
|
- |
|
|||||
Income tax expense |
(758 |
) |
(726 |
) |
|||||
Profit |
2 489 |
|
1 532 |
|
|||||
Profit attributable to non-controlling interest |
418 |
|
478 |
|
|||||
Profit attributable to equity holders of AB InBev |
2 071 |
|
1 054 |
|
|||||
Normalized EBITDA |
5 424 |
|
5 594 |
|
3.3 |
% |
|||
Underlying Profit |
1 971 |
|
1 970 |
|
|
||||
9M24 |
9M25 |
Organic |
|||||||
growth |
|||||||||
Revenue |
44 927 |
|
43 764 |
|
1.8 |
% |
|||
Cost of sales |
(20 100 |
) |
(19 198 |
) |
0.6 |
% |
|||
Gross profit |
24 827 |
|
24 566 |
|
3.7 |
% |
|||
SG&A |
(13 738 |
) |
(13 347 |
) |
(0.6 |
)% |
|||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
548 |
|
585 |
|
10.7 |
% |
|||
Normalized EBIT |
11 638 |
|
11 805 |
|
7.8 |
% |
|||
Non-underlying items above EBIT |
(244 |
) |
(39 |
) |
|||||
Net finance income/(expense) |
(3 400 |
) |
(3 210 |
) |
|||||
Non-underlying net finance income/(expense) |
(294 |
) |
(580 |
) |
|||||
Share of results of associates |
226 |
|
246 |
|
|||||
Non-underlying share of results of associates |
104 |
|
9 |
|
|||||
Income tax expense |
(2 304 |
) |
(2 130 |
) |
|||||
Profit |
5 725 |
|
6 100 |
|
|||||
Profit attributable to non-controlling interest |
1 090 |
|
1 222 |
|
|||||
Profit attributable to equity holders of AB InBev |
4 635 |
|
4 878 |
|
|||||
Normalized EBITDA |
15 712 |
|
15 750 |
|
5.8 |
% |
|||
Underlying Profit |
5 291 |
|
5 526 |
|
|
||||
Non-underlying items above EBIT & Non-underlying share of results of associates
Figure 4. Non-underlying items above EBIT & Non-underlying share of results of associates |
||||||||||||
in USD Mio |
3Q24 |
3Q25 |
9M24 |
9M25 |
||||||||
Restructuring |
(38 |
) |
(20 |
) |
(97 |
) |
(68 |
) |
||||
Business and asset disposal (incl. impairment losses) |
(87 |
) |
94 |
|
(147 |
) |
47 |
|
||||
Claims and legal costs |
- |
|
(18 |
) |
- |
|
(18 |
) |
||||
Non-underlying items in EBIT |
(125 |
) |
55 |
|
(244 |
) |
(39 |
) |
||||
Non-underlying share of results of associates |
- |
|
- |
|
104 |
|
9 |
|
||||
Normalized EBIT excludes positive non-underlying items of
Net finance income/(expense)
Figure 5. Net finance income/(expense) |
||||||||||||
in USD Mio |
3Q24 |
3Q25 |
9M24 |
9M25 |
||||||||
Net interest expense |
(685 |
) |
(675 |
) |
(2 084 |
) |
(1 959 |
) |
||||
Accretion expense and interest on pensions |
(185 |
) |
(228 |
) |
(612 |
) |
(580 |
) |
||||
Other financial results |
(173 |
) |
(262 |
) |
(704 |
) |
(672 |
) |
||||
Net finance income/(expense) |
(1 043 |
) |
(1 165 |
) |
(3 400 |
) |
(3 210 |
) |
||||
Non-underlying net finance income/(expense)
Figure 6. Non-underlying net finance income/(expense) |
|||||||||||
in USD Mio |
3Q24 |
3Q25 |
9M24 |
9M25 |
|||||||
Mark-to-market |
236 |
(947 |
) |
(271 |
) |
(608 |
) |
||||
Gain/(loss) on bond redemption and other |
- |
- |
|
(23 |
) |
29 |
|
||||
Non-underlying net finance income/(expense) |
236 |
(947 |
) |
(294 |
) |
(580 |
) |
||||
Non-underlying net finance expense in 3Q25 and 9M25 includes mark-to-market losses on derivative instruments entered into in order to hedge our share-based payment programs and shares issued in relation to the combination with Grupo Modelo and SAB.
The number of shares covered by the hedging of our share-based payment program, the deferred share instrument and the restricted shares are shown below, together with the opening and closing share prices.
Figure 7. Non-underlying equity derivative instruments |
||||||||
3Q24 |
3Q25 |
9M24 |
9M25 |
|||||
Share price at the start of the period (Euro) |
54.12 |
58.24 |
58.42 |
48.25 |
||||
Share price at the end of the period (Euro) |
59.38 |
50.80 |
59.38 |
50.80 |
||||
Number of equity derivative instruments at the end of the period (in million) |
100.5 |
100.5 |
100.5 |
100.5 |
||||
Income tax expense
Figure 8. Income tax expense |
||||||||
in USD Mio |
3Q24 |
3Q25 |
9M24 |
9M25 |
||||
Income tax expense |
758 |
726 |
2 304 |
2 130 |
||||
Effective tax rate |
|
|
|
|
||||
Normalized effective tax rate |
|
|
|
|
||||
The 9M24, 3Q25 and 9M25 effective tax rates were negatively impacted by non-deductible losses from derivatives related to the hedging of share-based payment programs and of the shares issued in a transaction related to the combinations with Grupo Modelo and SAB, while the 3Q24 effective tax rate was positively impacted by non-taxable gains from these derivatives. Furthermore, the 9M25 effective tax rate included
The decrease in Normalized ETR in 3Q25 and 9M25 compared to 3Q24 and 9M24 was mainly driven by country mix.
Underlying EPS
Figure 9. Underlying EPS |
||||||||||||
in USD per share, except number of shares in million |
3Q24 |
3Q25 |
9M24 |
9M25 |
||||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
2.71 |
|
2.82 |
|
7.84 |
|
7.93 |
|
||||
Depreciation, amortization and impairment |
(0.67 |
) |
(0.70 |
) |
(2.03 |
) |
(1.99 |
) |
||||
Normalized EBIT |
2.04 |
|
2.12 |
|
5.81 |
|
5.94 |
|
||||
Net finance income/(expense) |
(0.52 |
) |
(0.59 |
) |
(1.70 |
) |
(1.62 |
) |
||||
Income tax expense |
(0.39 |
) |
(0.38 |
) |
(1.09 |
) |
(1.10 |
) |
||||
Associates & non-controlling interests |
(0.17 |
) |
(0.16 |
) |
(0.43 |
) |
(0.47 |
) |
||||
Hyperinflation impacts |
0.02 |
|
0.01 |
|
0.06 |
|
0.03 |
|
||||
Underlying EPS |
0.98 |
|
0.99 |
|
2.64 |
|
2.78 |
|
||||
Weighted average number of ordinary and restricted shares |
2 004 |
|
1 986 |
|
2 004 |
|
1 986 |
|
||||
Reconciliation of IFRS and Non-IFRS Financial Measures
Profit attributable to equity holders and Underlying Profit
Figure 10. Underlying Profit |
|||||||||
in USD Mio |
3Q24 |
3Q25 |
9M24 |
9M25 |
|||||
Profit attributable to equity holders of AB InBev |
2 071 |
|
1 054 |
4 635 |
4 878 |
||||
Net impact of non-underlying items on profit |
(133 |
) |
898 |
542 |
593 |
||||
Hyperinflation impacts |
33 |
|
18 |
114 |
54 |
||||
Underlying Profit |
1 971 |
|
1 970 |
5 291 |
5 526 |
||||
Basic and Underlying EPS
Figure 11. Basic and Underlying EPS |
|||||||||
in USD per share, except number of shares in million |
3Q24 |
3Q25 |
9M24 |
9M25 |
|||||
Basic EPS |
1.03 |
|
0.53 |
2.31 |
2.46 |
||||
Net impact of non-underlying items |
(0.07 |
) |
0.45 |
0.27 |
0.30 |
||||
Hyperinflation impacts |
0.02 |
|
0.01 |
0.06 |
0.03 |
||||
Underlying EPS |
0.98 |
|
0.99 |
2.64 |
2.78 |
||||
FX translation impact |
- |
|
- |
- |
0.17 |
||||
Underlying EPS in constant currency |
0.98 |
|
0.99 |
2.64 |
2.95 |
||||
Weighted average number of ordinary and restricted shares |
2 004 |
|
1 986 |
2 004 |
1 986 |
||||
Profit attributable to equity holders and Normalized EBITDA
Figure 12. Reconciliation of Normalized EBITDA to Profit attributable to equity holders of AB InBev |
||||||||||||
in USD Mio |
3Q24 |
3Q25 |
9M24 |
9M25 |
||||||||
Profit attributable to equity holders of AB InBev |
2 071 |
|
1 054 |
|
4 635 |
|
4 878 |
|
||||
Non-controlling interests |
418 |
|
478 |
|
1 090 |
|
1 222 |
|
||||
Profit |
2 489 |
|
1 532 |
|
5 725 |
|
6 100 |
|
||||
Income tax expense |
758 |
|
726 |
|
2 304 |
|
2 130 |
|
||||
Share of result of associates |
(89 |
) |
(110 |
) |
(226 |
) |
(246 |
) |
||||
Non-underlying share of results of associates |
- |
|
- |
|
(104 |
) |
(9 |
) |
||||
Net finance (income)/expense |
1 043 |
|
1 165 |
|
3 400 |
|
3 210 |
|
||||
Non-underlying net finance (income)/expense |
(236 |
) |
947 |
|
294 |
|
580 |
|
||||
Non-underlying items above EBIT (incl. impairment losses) |
125 |
|
(55 |
) |
244 |
|
39 |
|
||||
Normalized EBIT |
4 091 |
|
4 205 |
|
11 638 |
|
11 805 |
|
||||
Depreciation, amortization and impairment |
1 333 |
|
1 390 |
|
4 074 |
|
3 945 |
|
||||
Normalized EBITDA |
5 424 |
|
5 594 |
|
15 712 |
|
15 750 |
|
||||
Normalized EBITDA, Normalized EBIT and Underlying Profit are non-IFRS financial measures used by AB InBev to reflect the company’s underlying performance. Underlying EPS and constant currency Underlying EPS are non-IFRS financial measures that AB InBev believes are useful to investors because they facilitate comparisons of EPS from period to period.
Normalized EBITDA is calculated by adjusting profit attributable to equity holders of AB InBev to exclude: (i) non-controlling interest; (ii) income tax expense; (iii) share of results of associates; (iv) non-underlying share of results of associates; (v) net finance income or cost; (vi) non-underlying net finance income or cost; (vii) non-underlying items above EBIT; and (viii) depreciation, amortization and impairment.
Underlying Profit is calculated by adjusting profit attributable to equity holders of AB InBev to exclude: (i) non-underlying items and (ii) hyperinflation impacts. Underlying EPS is calculated as Underlying Profit divided by the weighted average number of ordinary and restricted shares. Constant currency Underlying EPS is calculated as Underlying EPS excluding the effects of foreign currency translation by translating current period figures using the exchange rates from the same period in the prior year.
Normalized EBITDA, Normalized EBIT and Underlying Profit are not accounting measures under IFRS and should not be considered as an alternative to profit attributable to equity holders as a measure of operational performance, or an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. Underlying EPS and constant currency Underlying EPS are not accounting measures under IFRS and should not be considered as alternatives to earnings per share as a measure of operating performance on a per share basis. These non-IFRS financial measures do not have a standard calculation method and AB InBev’s definition of Normalized EBITDA, Normalized EBIT, Underlying Profit, Underlying EPS and constant currency Underlying EPS may not be comparable to that of other companies.
Interim 2025 dividend
The AB InBev Board of Directors has approved an interim dividend of
Interim dividend timeline |
||||||
Ex-dividend date |
Record Date |
Payment date |
||||
Euronext |
18 November 2025 |
19 November 2025 |
20 November 2025 |
|||
MEXBOL |
18 November 2025 |
19 November 2025 |
20 November 2025 |
|||
JSE |
17 November 2025 |
19 November 2025 |
20 November 2025 |
|||
NYSE (ADR program) |
19 November 2025 |
19 November 2025 |
17 December 2025 |
|||
Restricted Shares |
18 November 2025 |
19 November 2025 |
20 November 2025 |
|||
Recent Events
Announcement of
On 29 October 2025, the AB InBev Board of Directors approved a
Announcement of
On 30 October 2025, the company announced the redemption of approximately
1 Repurchases after 31 May 2026, if any, will be subject to renewal of the share buy-back powers by the Company’s General Meeting of Shareholders to be held on 29 April 2026. |
Notes
To facilitate the understanding of AB InBev’s underlying performance, the analyses of growth, including all comments in this press release, unless otherwise indicated, are based on organic growth and normalized numbers. In other words, financials are analyzed eliminating the impact of changes in currencies on translation of foreign operations, and scope changes. Since 1Q24, the definition of organic revenue growth has been amended to cap the price growth in
Legal disclaimer
This release contains “forward-looking statements”. These statements are based on the current expectations and views of future events and developments of the management of AB InBev and are naturally subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. The forward-looking statements contained in this release include statements other than historical facts and include statements typically containing words such as “will”, “may”, “should”, “believe”, “intends”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “targets”, “ambition”, “estimates”, “likely”, “foresees” and words of similar import. All statements other than statements of historical facts are forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect the current views of the management of AB InBev, are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties about AB InBev and are dependent on many factors, some of which are outside of AB InBev’s control. There are important factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different, including, but not limited to the risks and uncertainties relating to AB InBev that are described under Item 3.D of AB InBev’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on 12 March 2025. Many of these risks and uncertainties are, and will be, exacerbated by any further worsening of the global business and economic environment, including as a result of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and ongoing geopolitical conflicts. Other unknown or unpredictable factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included elsewhere, including AB InBev’s most recent Form 20-F and other reports furnished on Form 6-K, and any other documents that AB InBev has made public. Any forward-looking statements made in this communication are qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by AB InBev will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, AB InBev or its business or operations. Except as required by law, AB InBev undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The nine months 2025 (9M25) financial data set out in Figure 1 (except for the volume information), Figures 3 to 6, 8, 10 and 12 of this press release have been extracted from the group’s unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements as of and for the nine-month period ended 30 September 2025, which have been reviewed by our statutory auditors PwC Bedrijfsrevisoren BV/Réviseurs d’Entreprises SRL in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (
Conference call and webcast
Investor Conference call and webcast on Thursday, 30 October 2025:
2.00pm
Registration details:
Webcast (listen-only mode):
AB InBev 3Q25 Results Webcast
To join by phone, please use one of the following two phone numbers:
Toll-Free: +1-877-407-8029
Toll: +1-201-689-8029
About AB InBev
Anheuser-Busch InBev (AB InBev) is a publicly traded company (Euronext: ABI) based in Leuven,
Annex 1: Segment reporting (3Q)
AB InBev Worldwide |
3Q24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
3Q25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
148 039 |
|
(237 |
) |
- |
|
(5 483 |
) |
142 319 |
|
(3.7 |
)% |
||||||
Revenue |
15 046 |
|
(59 |
) |
9 |
|
136 |
|
15 133 |
|
0.9 |
% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(6 680 |
) |
34 |
|
23 |
|
28 |
|
(6 596 |
) |
0.4 |
% |
||||||
Gross profit |
8 366 |
|
(25 |
) |
32 |
|
164 |
|
8 537 |
|
2.0 |
% |
||||||
SG&A |
(4 490 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(23 |
) |
(4 535 |
) |
(0.5 |
)% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
215 |
|
(8 |
) |
7 |
|
(11 |
) |
203 |
|
(5.4 |
)% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
4 091 |
|
(49 |
) |
33 |
|
129 |
|
4 205 |
|
3.2 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
5 424 |
|
(51 |
) |
45 |
|
177 |
|
5 594 |
|
3.3 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
36.0 |
% |
37.0 |
% |
85bps |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
3Q24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
3Q25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
22 764 |
|
(271 |
) |
- |
|
(597 |
) |
21 896 |
|
(2.7 |
)% |
||||||
Revenue |
3 867 |
|
(74 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(26 |
) |
3 765 |
|
(0.7 |
)% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(1 602 |
) |
56 |
|
1 |
|
45 |
|
(1 500 |
) |
2.9 |
% |
||||||
Gross profit |
2 265 |
|
(18 |
) |
(2 |
) |
19 |
|
2 264 |
|
0.8 |
% |
||||||
SG&A |
(1 094 |
) |
(20 |
) |
0 |
|
(7 |
) |
(1 121 |
) |
(0.6 |
)% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
8 |
|
- |
|
0 |
|
(5 |
) |
3 |
|
(68.9 |
)% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
1 179 |
|
(39 |
) |
(1 |
) |
7 |
|
1 146 |
|
0.6 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
1 358 |
|
(39 |
) |
(1 |
) |
5 |
|
1 323 |
|
0.4 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
35.1 |
% |
35.1 |
% |
37bps |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Middle |
3Q24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
3Q25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
37 107 |
|
(51 |
) |
- |
|
(141 |
) |
36 915 |
|
(0.4 |
)% |
||||||
Revenue |
4 103 |
|
6 |
|
41 |
|
174 |
|
4 325 |
|
4.2 |
% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(1 462 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(53 |
) |
(1 527 |
) |
(3.6 |
)% |
||||||
Gross profit |
2 641 |
|
4 |
|
31 |
|
121 |
|
2 797 |
|
4.6 |
% |
||||||
SG&A |
(936 |
) |
(27 |
) |
(13 |
) |
16 |
|
(960 |
) |
1.7 |
% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
3 |
|
(0 |
) |
0 |
|
(2 |
) |
1 |
|
(85.8 |
)% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
1 707 |
|
(23 |
) |
18 |
|
136 |
|
1 838 |
|
8.0 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
2 068 |
|
(25 |
) |
21 |
|
106 |
|
2 170 |
|
5.2 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
50.4 |
% |
50.2 |
% |
45bps |
|||||||||||||
|
3Q24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
3Q25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
39 502 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(2 580 |
) |
36 922 |
|
(6.5 |
)% |
||||||
Revenue |
2 932 |
|
(54 |
) |
(136 |
) |
59 |
|
2 802 |
|
2.0 |
% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(1 502 |
) |
29 |
|
87 |
|
(26 |
) |
(1 413 |
) |
(1.8 |
)% |
||||||
Gross profit |
1 430 |
|
(25 |
) |
(49 |
) |
33 |
|
1 389 |
|
2.3 |
% |
||||||
SG&A |
(870 |
) |
10 |
|
48 |
|
(28 |
) |
(841 |
) |
(3.2 |
)% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
104 |
|
(12 |
) |
3 |
|
4 |
|
100 |
|
4.8 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
664 |
|
(26 |
) |
2 |
|
9 |
|
648 |
|
1.4 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
908 |
|
(24 |
) |
(6 |
) |
3 |
|
881 |
|
0.4 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
31.0 |
% |
31.5 |
% |
(48)bps |
|||||||||||||
EMEA |
3Q24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
3Q25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
24 039 |
|
85 |
|
- |
|
25 |
|
24 149 |
|
0.1 |
% |
||||||
Revenue |
2 351 |
|
(8 |
) |
111 |
|
70 |
|
2 524 |
|
3.0 |
% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(1 188 |
) |
6 |
|
(57 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(1 244 |
) |
(0.4 |
)% |
||||||
Gross profit |
1 163 |
|
(2 |
) |
54 |
|
65 |
|
1 280 |
|
5.7 |
% |
||||||
SG&A |
(689 |
) |
(17 |
) |
(35 |
) |
(20 |
) |
(760 |
) |
(2.9 |
)% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
47 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
59 |
|
8.7 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
521 |
|
(15 |
) |
22 |
|
50 |
|
579 |
|
9.9 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
780 |
|
(15 |
) |
35 |
|
58 |
|
859 |
|
7.6 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
33.2 |
% |
34.0 |
% |
148bps |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
3Q24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
3Q25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
24 514 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(2 213 |
) |
22 301 |
|
(9.0 |
)% |
||||||
Revenue |
1 691 |
|
0 |
|
(6 |
) |
(153 |
) |
1 533 |
|
(9.0 |
)% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(797 |
) |
(8 |
) |
3 |
|
84 |
|
(718 |
) |
10.4 |
% |
||||||
Gross profit |
894 |
|
(8 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(69 |
) |
814 |
|
(7.8 |
)% |
||||||
SG&A |
(580 |
) |
(10 |
) |
2 |
|
43 |
|
(546 |
) |
7.2 |
% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
27 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
6 |
|
32 |
|
20.8 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
340 |
|
(18 |
) |
(0 |
) |
(21 |
) |
300 |
|
(6.4 |
)% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
503 |
|
(18 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(32 |
) |
452 |
|
(6.6 |
)% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
29.8 |
% |
29.5 |
% |
77bps |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Global Export and Holding Companies |
3Q24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
3Q25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
112 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
23 |
|
136 |
|
20.6 |
% |
||||||
Revenue |
102 |
|
71 |
|
1 |
|
12 |
|
185 |
|
11.4 |
% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(129 |
) |
(47 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(17 |
) |
(194 |
) |
(13.3 |
)% |
||||||
Gross profit |
(27 |
) |
24 |
|
0 |
|
(5 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(20.8 |
)% |
||||||
SG&A |
(320 |
) |
49 |
|
(8 |
) |
(27 |
) |
(307 |
) |
(10.4 |
)% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
26 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
(18 |
) |
8 |
|
(68.4 |
)% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
(321 |
) |
72 |
|
(7 |
) |
(51 |
) |
(306 |
) |
(19.4 |
)% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
(194 |
) |
70 |
|
(3 |
) |
36 |
|
(91 |
) |
26.6 |
% |
||||||
Annex 2: Segment reporting (9M)
AB InBev Worldwide |
9M24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
9M25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
433 877 |
|
(736 |
) |
- |
|
(11 207 |
) |
421 934 |
|
(2.6 |
)% |
||||||
Revenue |
44 927 |
|
(190 |
) |
(1 777 |
) |
805 |
|
43 764 |
|
1.8 |
% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(20 100 |
) |
(5 |
) |
793 |
|
114 |
|
(19 198 |
) |
0.6 |
% |
||||||
Gross profit |
24 827 |
|
(196 |
) |
(984 |
) |
919 |
|
24 566 |
|
3.7 |
% |
||||||
SG&A |
(13 738 |
) |
(35 |
) |
504 |
|
(78 |
) |
(13 347 |
) |
(0.6 |
)% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
548 |
|
5 |
|
(26 |
) |
57 |
|
585 |
|
10.7 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
11 638 |
|
(225 |
) |
(505 |
) |
898 |
|
11 805 |
|
7.8 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
15 712 |
|
(225 |
) |
(647 |
) |
909 |
|
15 750 |
|
5.8 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
35.0 |
% |
36.0 |
% |
138bps |
|||||||||||||
|
9M24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
9M25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
66 756 |
|
(745 |
) |
- |
|
(1 896 |
) |
64 115 |
|
(2.9 |
)% |
||||||
Revenue |
11 324 |
|
(200 |
) |
(40 |
) |
(111 |
) |
10 973 |
|
(1.0 |
)% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(4 752 |
) |
147 |
|
14 |
|
144 |
|
(4 447 |
) |
3.2 |
% |
||||||
Gross profit |
6 572 |
|
(53 |
) |
(27 |
) |
33 |
|
6 525 |
|
0.5 |
% |
||||||
SG&A |
(3 280 |
) |
(29 |
) |
14 |
|
(0 |
) |
(3 295 |
) |
(0.0 |
)% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
(1 |
) |
- |
|
1 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
- |
|
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
3 291 |
|
(82 |
) |
(11 |
) |
58 |
|
3 256 |
|
1.8 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
3 822 |
|
(82 |
) |
(14 |
) |
55 |
|
3 781 |
|
1.5 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
33.8 |
% |
34.5 |
% |
84bps |
|||||||||||||
Middle |
9M24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
9M25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
111 179 |
|
(51 |
) |
- |
|
(310 |
) |
110 818 |
|
(0.3 |
)% |
||||||
Revenue |
12 677 |
|
(19 |
) |
(758 |
) |
549 |
|
12 449 |
|
4.3 |
% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(4 641 |
) |
(32 |
) |
263 |
|
17 |
|
(4 393 |
) |
0.4 |
% |
||||||
Gross profit |
8 036 |
|
(51 |
) |
(495 |
) |
566 |
|
8 055 |
|
7.1 |
% |
||||||
SG&A |
(3 002 |
) |
(11 |
) |
179 |
|
(26 |
) |
(2 858 |
) |
(0.9 |
)% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
26 |
|
(0 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(10 |
) |
15 |
|
(36.8 |
)% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
5 060 |
|
(61 |
) |
(317 |
) |
530 |
|
5 212 |
|
10.6 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
6 172 |
|
(63 |
) |
(383 |
) |
451 |
|
6 177 |
|
7.4 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
48.7 |
% |
49.6 |
% |
140bps |
|||||||||||||
|
9M24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
9M25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
115 818 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(3 806 |
) |
112 011 |
|
(3.3 |
)% |
||||||
Revenue |
8 950 |
|
(40 |
) |
(1 036 |
) |
435 |
|
8 309 |
|
4.9 |
% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(4 515 |
) |
(70 |
) |
548 |
|
(140 |
) |
(4 176 |
) |
(3.1 |
)% |
||||||
Gross profit |
4 435 |
|
(110 |
) |
(487 |
) |
295 |
|
4 132 |
|
6.7 |
% |
||||||
SG&A |
(2 787 |
) |
(16 |
) |
335 |
|
(85 |
) |
(2 553 |
) |
(3.0 |
)% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
319 |
|
(9 |
) |
(27 |
) |
18 |
|
302 |
|
6.2 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
1 967 |
|
(135 |
) |
(180 |
) |
228 |
|
1 881 |
|
11.9 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
2 742 |
|
(131 |
) |
(268 |
) |
236 |
|
2 580 |
|
8.8 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
30.6 |
% |
31.1 |
% |
113bps |
|||||||||||||
EMEA |
9M24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
9M25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
68 921 |
|
162 |
|
- |
|
(10 |
) |
69 073 |
|
(0.0 |
)% |
||||||
Revenue |
6 579 |
|
(7 |
) |
127 |
|
278 |
|
6 978 |
|
4.3 |
% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(3 403 |
) |
19 |
|
(62 |
) |
(77 |
) |
(3 523 |
) |
(2.3 |
)% |
||||||
Gross profit |
3 176 |
|
12 |
|
65 |
|
202 |
|
3 454 |
|
6.4 |
% |
||||||
SG&A |
(1 994 |
) |
(54 |
) |
(44 |
) |
(40 |
) |
(2 131 |
) |
(2.0 |
)% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
126 |
|
14 |
|
4 |
|
16 |
|
159 |
|
11.1 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
1 308 |
|
(27 |
) |
25 |
|
177 |
|
1 483 |
|
13.9 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
2 070 |
|
(27 |
) |
40 |
|
200 |
|
2 283 |
|
9.8 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
31.5 |
% |
32.7 |
% |
166bps |
|||||||||||||
|
9M24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
9M25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
70 958 |
|
(93 |
) |
- |
|
(5 200 |
) |
65 665 |
|
(7.3 |
)% |
||||||
Revenue |
5 074 |
|
(6 |
) |
(71 |
) |
(356 |
) |
4 641 |
|
(7.0 |
)% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(2 381 |
) |
(17 |
) |
32 |
|
192 |
|
(2 174 |
) |
8.0 |
% |
||||||
Gross profit |
2 694 |
|
(23 |
) |
(39 |
) |
(164 |
) |
2 466 |
|
(6.1 |
)% |
||||||
SG&A |
(1 575 |
) |
(13 |
) |
23 |
|
77 |
|
(1 487 |
) |
4.9 |
% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
82 |
|
0 |
|
(0 |
) |
(9 |
) |
73 |
|
(11.4 |
)% |
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
1 202 |
|
(36 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(96 |
) |
1 053 |
|
(8.2 |
)% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
1 689 |
|
(36 |
) |
(22 |
) |
(123 |
) |
1 508 |
|
(7.4 |
)% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA margin |
33.3 |
% |
32.5 |
% |
(12)bps |
|||||||||||||
Global Export and Holding Companies |
9M24 |
Scope |
Currency Translation |
Organic Growth |
9M25 |
Organic Growth |
||||||||||||
Volumes |
244 |
|
(9 |
) |
- |
|
16 |
|
252 |
|
6.9 |
% |
||||||
Revenue |
323 |
|
82 |
|
1 |
|
10 |
|
416 |
|
3.5 |
% |
||||||
Cost of sales |
(408 |
) |
(51 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(22 |
) |
(484 |
) |
(5.9 |
)% |
||||||
Gross profit |
(86 |
) |
31 |
|
(0 |
) |
(12 |
) |
(68 |
) |
(13.1 |
)% |
||||||
SG&A |
(1 101 |
) |
86 |
|
(3 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(1 023 |
) |
(0.5 |
)% |
||||||
Other operating income/(expenses) |
(5 |
) |
0 |
|
(2 |
) |
17 |
|
11 |
|
- |
|
||||||
Normalized EBIT |
(1 191 |
) |
117 |
|
(5 |
) |
0 |
|
(1 079 |
) |
0.0 |
% |
||||||
Normalized EBITDA |
(784 |
) |
114 |
|
(1 |
) |
91 |
|
(580 |
) |
13.2 |
% |
||||||
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251029571716/en/
Investors
Shaun Fullalove
E-mail: shaun.fullalove@ab-inbev.com
Ekaterina Baillie
E-mail: ekaterina.baillie@ab-inbev.com
Patrick Ryan
E-mail: patrick.ryan@ab-inbev.com
Media
Media Relations
E-mail: media.relations@ab-inbev.com
Source: Anheuser-Busch InBev