STOCK TITAN

Insmed Provides Clinical Update on Phase 2b CEDAR Study

Rhea-AI Impact
(High)
Rhea-AI Sentiment
(Neutral)
Tags

Insmed (Nasdaq: INSM) reported that the Phase 2b CEDAR study of brensocatib in adult hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) did not meet primary or secondary efficacy endpoints for either 10 mg or 40 mg arms. Insmed will discontinue its HS development program.

Safety was consistent with prior studies and no new safety signals were identified, including at 40 mg. At Week 16, AN count reductions were 45.5% (10 mg), 40.3% (40 mg) and 57.1% (placebo). Reported TEAEs: Any TEAE 55.4% (10 mg), 42.9% (40 mg), 45.7% (placebo); severe TEAE 1.4% (10 mg); serious TEAE 4.1% (10 mg), 1.4% (40 mg), 1.4% (placebo).

Loading...
Loading translation...

Positive

  • No new safety signals identified up to the 40 mg dose
  • Brensocatib was generally well tolerated across both dose arms
  • Company plans to present CEDAR data at a future congress

Negative

  • Study failed to meet primary and secondary efficacy endpoints
  • Insmed will discontinue the brensocatib HS development program
  • Placebo reduction in AN count (57.1%) exceeded both active arms

News Market Reaction – INSM

-1.75%
7 alerts
-1.75% News Effect
-$601M Valuation Impact
$33.72B Market Cap
0.1x Rel. Volume

On the day this news was published, INSM declined 1.75%, reflecting a mild negative market reaction. Our momentum scanner triggered 7 alerts that day, indicating moderate trading interest and price volatility. This price movement removed approximately $601M from the company's valuation, bringing the market cap to $33.72B at that time.

Data tracked by StockTitan Argus on the day of publication.

Key Figures

AN count reduction 10 mg: 45.5% AN count reduction 40 mg: 40.3% AN count reduction placebo: 57.1% +5 more
8 metrics
AN count reduction 10 mg 45.5% Week 16 change from baseline in brensocatib 10 mg arm
AN count reduction 40 mg 40.3% Week 16 change from baseline in brensocatib 40 mg arm
AN count reduction placebo 57.1% Week 16 change from baseline in placebo arm
Sample size 10 mg 74 patients Brensocatib 10 mg once daily arm
Sample size 40 mg 70 patients Brensocatib 40 mg once daily arm
Sample size placebo 70 patients Placebo arm
Any TEAE 10 mg 41 patients (55.4%) Treatment-emergent adverse events in 10 mg arm over 16 weeks
Serious TEAE 10 mg 3 patients (4.1%) Serious treatment-emergent adverse events in 10 mg arm

Market Reality Check

Price: $104.80 Vol: Volume 1,849,795 is below...
normal vol
$104.80 Last Close
Volume Volume 1,849,795 is below the 20-day average of 2,524,555 (relative volume 0.73). normal
Technical Price $163.81 is above the 200-day MA at $151.04, 23% below the 52-week high and 171.21% above the 52-week low.

Peers on Argus

INSM was up 0.85% while key biotech peers were mixed: BNTX +0.52%, ARGX +1.02%, ...

INSM was up 0.85% while key biotech peers were mixed: BNTX +0.52%, ARGX +1.02%, GMAB +1.35%, versus ONC -2.85% and REGN -0.49%. No coordinated sector move is evident.

Historical Context

5 past events · Latest: Mar 23 (Positive)
Pattern 5 events
Date Event Sentiment Move Catalyst
Mar 23 Clinical trial results Positive +5.9% Phase 3b ENCORE trial met primary and key culture conversion endpoints.
Mar 05 Equity inducement grants Neutral -4.2% Inducement RSUs and options granted to 85 new employees under plan.
Feb 19 Earnings and guidance Positive +6.5% 2025 revenue of $606.4M and strong 2026 product revenue expectations.
Feb 13 Investor conferences Neutral +1.8% Announcement of management presentations at two March 2026 conferences.
Feb 05 Earnings call scheduling Neutral -0.9% Scheduled date and access details for Q4 and full‑year 2025 call.
Pattern Detected

Shares have tended to rise on strong clinical and earnings updates, while neutral corporate news has produced mixed or negative moves.

Recent Company History

Over the last few months, Insmed has reported multiple milestones. On Feb 19, 2026 earnings highlighted $606.4M in 2025 revenue and the stock rose 6.54%. A positive Phase 3b ENCORE readout on Mar 23 lifted shares 5.87%. In contrast, neutral items like inducement grants on Mar 5 and conference participation on Feb 13 saw modest declines or small gains. Today’s negative Phase 2b CEDAR outcome contrasts with that generally favorable backdrop of recent clinical and financial progress.

Market Pulse Summary

This announcement details that the Phase 2b CEDAR study of brensocatib in hidradenitis suppurativa d...
Analysis

This announcement details that the Phase 2b CEDAR study of brensocatib in hidradenitis suppurativa did not meet primary or secondary efficacy endpoints, and the HS program will be discontinued despite a generally tolerable safety profile. In the context of recent positive trial and earnings updates, this represents a setback for one indication rather than the entire franchise. Investors may watch future clinical readouts and regulatory milestones, as well as performance of existing products, to assess how the pipeline mix evolves.

Key Terms

phase 2b, hidradenitis suppurativa, efficacy endpoints, placebo, +2 more
6 terms
phase 2b medical
"today announced that the Phase 2b CEDAR study, which evaluated brensocatib"
Phase 2b is a stage in the development of a new medicine or treatment where researchers test its effectiveness and safety in a larger group of people. This step helps determine whether the treatment works well enough to move forward and if it has manageable side effects, which is important for investors because successful results can lead to potential approval and market opportunity.
hidradenitis suppurativa medical
"in adult patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), did not meet"
A chronic skin disease marked by recurring, painful lumps and tunnels under the skin that often leak and leave scars; it behaves like a slow-burning, recurring infection in areas with many sweat glands. For investors, it matters because the condition has few consistently effective treatments and causes long-term healthcare use, making successful new drugs, devices, or diagnostics potentially high-value opportunities while also carrying clinical-trial, regulatory and reimbursement risks.
efficacy endpoints medical
"did not meet its primary or secondary efficacy endpoints in either the 10 mg"
Efficacy endpoints are the specific results a clinical study measures to show whether a treatment works—examples include symptom improvement, fewer disease events, or longer survival—and they act like checkpoints that determine success. Investors care because these measured outcomes drive regulatory approval, how the medicine can be marketed, and its commercial potential; strong, clear endpoints can raise a drug’s value while weak or missed endpoints can cut projected revenue and investor confidence.
placebo medical
"respectively, compared to a 57.1% reduction in the placebo arm."
A placebo is an inactive pill, injection or procedure that looks and feels like the real treatment but contains no therapeutic ingredient, often called a sugar pill. Investors care because comparing a drug to a placebo reveals whether observed benefits come from the medicine itself or from expectation; clear superiority over placebo reduces regulatory and commercial risk, much like a blind taste test proves a new recipe really tastes better.
treatment-emergent adverse event medical
"Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) percentages during the 16-week"
An event is called a treatment-emergent adverse event when a new or worsening unwanted health effect appears after a person starts a drug or medical treatment, typically measured from the first dose onward in clinical studies. Investors watch these events because they can stop or slow product approval, raise development costs, or undermine market confidence—like a widely reported defect in a new gadget that triggers recalls and damages sales.
proof-of-concept medical
"The CEDAR study was designed as a proof-of-concept study to determine whether"
A proof-of-concept is a demonstration that shows a new idea or method can work as intended, serving as a small-scale test before full development. For investors, it signals that a concept has been successfully tested in principle, reducing uncertainty about whether it can be practically implemented. This helps determine if further investment or effort is justified to develop the idea further.

AI-generated analysis. Not financial advice.

—Study Did Not Meet Primary or Secondary Efficacy Endpoints; Insmed Will Discontinue HS Program— 

—Safety Was Consistent with Previous Studies and No New Safety Signals Were Identified for Either Dose of Brensocatib— 

BRIDGEWATER, N.J., April 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Insmed Incorporated (Nasdaq: INSM), a people-first global biopharmaceutical company striving to deliver first- and best-in-class therapies to transform the lives of patients facing serious diseases, today announced that the Phase 2b CEDAR study, which evaluated brensocatib in adult patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), did not meet its primary or secondary efficacy endpoints in either the 10 mg or 40 mg treatment arms. Brensocatib was well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified, including in the 40 mg arm, which is the highest dose Insmed has studied to date. Insmed will discontinue its development program of brensocatib in HS and intends to present these data at a future congress.

"The CEDAR study was designed as a proof-of-concept study to determine whether brensocatib could provide benefit for patients with HS—a disease where the lack of established animal models makes clinical development particularly challenging," said Martina Flammer, M.D., MBA, Chief Medical Officer of Insmed. "While we are disappointed in the results, we hope that insights gained from this study will contribute to the broader scientific understanding of HS. We are grateful to the patients and investigators who participated in this study."

At Week 16, study participants experienced a 45.5% and 40.3% reduction from baseline in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count in the brensocatib 10 mg and 40 mg arms, respectively, compared to a 57.1% reduction in the placebo arm. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) percentages during the 16-week placebo-controlled treatment period were:


Brensocatib

10 mg Once Daily

(N=74)

Brensocatib

40 mg Once Daily

(N=70)

Placebo

(N=70)

Any TEAE, n (%)

41 (55.4)

30 (42.9)

32 (45.7)

Severe TEAE, n (%)

1 (1.4)

0

0

Serious TEAE, n (%)

3 (4.1)

1 (1.4)

1 (1.4)

About the Phase 2b CEDAR Study
CEDAR was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2b study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brensocatib in adults with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. The study enrolled 214 patients at 72 sites globally. In the study, participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive brensocatib 10 mg, brensocatib 40 mg, or placebo, once daily for 16 weeks. After the first 16 weeks, participants either continued the same randomized dose of brensocatib, or if on placebo, were randomized to receive brensocatib 10 mg or 40 mg. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at Week 16.

About Insmed
Insmed Incorporated is a people-first global biopharmaceutical company striving to deliver first- and best-in-class therapies to transform the lives of patients facing serious diseases. The Company is advancing a diverse portfolio of approved and mid- to late-stage investigational medicines as well as cutting-edge drug discovery focused on serving patient communities where the need is greatest. Insmed's most advanced programs are in pulmonary and inflammatory conditions, including two approved therapies to treat chronic, debilitating lung diseases. The Company's early-stage programs encompass a wide range of technologies and modalities, including gene therapy, AI-driven protein engineering, protein manufacturing, RNA end-joining, and synthetic rescue.

Headquartered in Bridgewater, New Jersey, Insmed has offices and research locations throughout the United States, Europe, and Japan. Insmed is proud to be recognized as one of the best employers in the biopharmaceutical industry, including spending five consecutive years as the No. 1 Science Top Employer. Visit www.insmed.com to learn more or follow us on LinkedInInstagramYouTube, and X

Forward-looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. "Forward-looking statements," as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, are statements that are not historical facts and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Words herein such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "would," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "intends," "potential," "continues," and similar expressions (as well as other words or expressions referencing future events, conditions or circumstances) may identify forward-looking statements. 

The forward-looking statements in this press release are based upon the Company's current expectations and beliefs, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the Company's actual results, performance and achievements and the timing of certain events to differ materially from the results, performance, achievements or timings discussed, projected, anticipated or indicated in any forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, among others, the following: the risk that topline data from the Company's clinical trials, including the CEDAR study, that the Company announces or publishes from time to time may change as more patient data become available or may be interpreted differently if additional data are disclosed; failure to successfully conduct future clinical trials, including due to the Company's potential inability to enroll or retain sufficient patients to conduct and complete the trials or generate data necessary for regulatory approval, among other things; development of unexpected safety or efficacy concerns related to the Company's product candidates; and the cost and potential reputational damage resulting from litigation to which the Company is or may become a party, including product liability claims.

The Company may not actually achieve the results, plans, intentions or expectations indicated by the Company's forward-looking statements because, by their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. For additional information about the risks and uncertainties that may affect the Company's business, please see the factors discussed in Item 1A, "Risk Factors," in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 and any subsequent Company filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 

The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release. The Company disclaims any obligation, except as specifically required by law and the rules of the SEC, to publicly update or revise any such statements to reflect any change in expectations or in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statements may be based, or that may affect the likelihood that actual results will differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. 

Contact:

Investors:

Bryan Dunn
Vice President, Investor Relations
(646) 812-4030
investor.relations@insmed.com

Media:

Claire Mulhearn
Vice President, Corporate Communications
(862) 842-6819
media@insmed.com

Insmed-Logo-Purple (PRNewsfoto/Insmed Incorporated)

 

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/insmed-provides-clinical-update-on-phase-2b-cedar-study-302736190.html

SOURCE Insmed Incorporated

FAQ

What did Insmed announce about the Phase 2b CEDAR study (INSM) on April 7, 2026?

Insmed announced the Phase 2b CEDAR study did not meet primary or secondary endpoints and the company will discontinue the HS program. According to the company, safety remained consistent with prior studies and no new safety signals were identified.

Why is Insmed discontinuing the brensocatib HS program (INSM)?

Insmed is discontinuing the HS program because the CEDAR study failed to meet efficacy endpoints at both doses. According to the company, AN count reductions in the placebo arm exceeded reductions seen in the active treatment arms at Week 16.

What were the Week 16 AN count results for brensocatib in CEDAR (INSM)?

At Week 16, AN count reductions were 45.5% (10 mg), 40.3% (40 mg), and 57.1% (placebo). According to the company, these results show the study did not achieve its intended efficacy outcomes.

Were there any safety concerns reported in the CEDAR study for brensocatib (INSM)?

No new safety signals were identified and brensocatib was reported as generally well tolerated at both doses. According to the company, safety was consistent with previous studies, including the 40 mg arm, the highest dose studied to date.

How did treatment-emergent adverse events compare across arms in CEDAR (INSM)?

Any TEAE rates were 55.4% (10 mg), 42.9% (40 mg), and 45.7% (placebo); serious TEAEs were 4.1% (10 mg), 1.4% (40 mg), 1.4% (placebo). According to the company, severe TEAEs were low overall.