Kinross reports 2025 fourth-quarter and full-year results
Rhea-AI Summary
Kinross (TSX: K, NYSE: KGC) reported fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 results on Feb. 18, 2026. The company delivered on all key guidance metrics, maintained a three-year production outlook of 2.0 million Au eq. oz. per year, and posted record free cash flow of $2.5 billion in 2025.
Kinross returned $1.5 billion to debt and equity holders in 2025 and is targeting 40% of free cash flow for shareholder returns in 2026.
Positive
- Record free cash flow of $2.5 billion in 2025
- Maintained three-year production outlook of 2.0 million Au eq. oz. per year
- Returned $1.5 billion to debt and equity holders in 2025
- Targeting 40% of free cash flow for shareholder returns in 2026
Negative
- $1.5 billion cash outflow returned to holders in 2025, reducing available cash
Key Figures
Market Reality Check
Peers on Argus
KGC is down 2.44% while peers are mixed: AU +1.86%, FNV +0.93%, PAAS +1.19%, WPM -0.19%, AGI -1.25%. The mixed peer moves suggest today’s weakness is more stock-specific than sector-driven.
Historical Context
| Date | Event | Sentiment | Move | Catalyst |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22 | Earnings date notice | Neutral | +1.4% | Announced Q4/2025 results date, 2026 guidance and conference call details. |
| Jan 15 | Project construction | Positive | -0.1% | Proceeding with Phase X, Curlew and Redbird 2, adding 3M ounces production. |
| Jan 08 | Project update call | Neutral | +1.2% | Scheduled update and virtual presentation on key development projects. |
| Dec 04 | Credit rating upgrade | Positive | -0.2% | Moody’s upgraded rating to Baa2 amid significant Senior Notes redemptions. |
| Nov 04 | Debt redemption | Neutral | -4.0% | Planned redemption of <b>$500M</b> Senior Notes due 2027, reducing outstanding debt. |
Recent news skewed positive or neutral, with several debt-reduction and project updates; market reactions have been mixed, sometimes selling on balance-sheet positives.
Over the past few months, Kinross has focused on transparency around its reporting dates and on balance-sheet and project improvements. A Jan 22, 2026 notice about the Q4/2025 results and 2026 guidance saw a modest +1.42% move. Project updates at Round Mountain Phase X, Kettle River-Curlew and Bald Mountain Redbird 2, plus proceeding with Phase X, Curlew and Redbird 2 (adding 3 million ounces of production), underscored growth plans. In late 2025, Moody’s upgraded Kinross to Baa2 amid substantial debt redemptions totaling $1.5 billion over 2024–2025.
Market Pulse Summary
This announcement underscores Kinross’s ability to generate substantial cash, with record free cash flow of $2.5 billion in 2025 and a maintained three-year outlook of 2.0 million Au eq. oz. per year. Returning $1.5 billion to debt and equity holders and targeting 40% of future free cash flow for shareholder returns signal an emphasis on capital discipline. Investors may watch upcoming filings and calls for clarity on sustaining this cash profile and the durability of the production outlook.
Key Terms
Au eq. oz. technical
AI-generated analysis. Not financial advice.
Delivered on all key guidance metrics, maintains three-year outlook of 2.0 million Au eq. oz. per year
Record free cash flow of
Targeting
TORONTO, Feb. 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kinross Gold Corporation (TSX: K, NYSE: KGC) (“Kinross” or the “Company”) today announced its results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 20251.
This news release contains forward-looking information about expected future events and financial and operating performance of the Company. We refer to the risks and assumptions set out in our Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information located on pages 41 and 42 of this release. All dollar amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted.
2025 full-year results and 2026 guidance:
| 2025 guidance (+/- | Q4 2025 results | 2025 full-year results | 2026 guidance (+/- | |
| Gold equivalentproduction1 (ounces) | 2.0 million | 483,582 | 2.0 million | 2.0 million |
| Production cost of sales2 Attributable production cost of sales1 | - | - | ||
| ($ per Au eq. oz.) | ||||
| Attributable all-in sustaining cost1 ($ per Au eq. oz.) | ||||
| Capital expenditures3 Attributablecapital expenditures1 | - | - | ||
| (million) |
- Kinross has forecasted stable production guidance of approximately 2.0 million attributable Au eq. oz. (+/-
5% ) in 2027 and 2028.
Record Q4 and full-year highlights:
- Margins4 of
$2,847 per Au eq. oz. sold in Q4 2025, and$2,283 for 2025. - Operating cash flow5 of
$1,146.9 million in Q4 2025, and$3,760.5 million in 2025. - Attributable free cash flow1 of
$769.4 million in Q4 2025 and$2,473.5 million in 2025. - Reported net earnings6 of
$906.5 million in Q4 2025, or$0.75 per share, and$2,390.1 million , or$1.96 per share, in 2025. - Adjusted net earnings7, 8 of
$809.3 million , or$0.67 per share in Q4 2025, and$2,243.9 million , or$1.84 per share, in 2025. - In 2025, Kinross returned
$752.4 million to shareholders through its share buyback program and dividend. This included repurchasing$600.3 million in shares, and a17% increase to its dividend during the year. In 2026, Kinross is targeting40% of free cash flow to return of capital through both share buybacks and dividends. - Kinross’ Board of Directors has approved an additional
14% increase to its quarterly dividend to$0.04 per common share, which would amount to$0.16 per common share on an annualized basis. This represents a total increase of33% since Q3 2025. - The Company continued to prioritize debt reduction and repaid
$700 million in 2025. Kinross had net cash9 of$1,004.1 million , with$1,742.3 million of cash and cash equivalents and total liquidity10 of$3.5 billion as at December 31, 2025.
Operational highlights:
- Tasiast was the highest-margin operation in the portfolio.
- Paracatu produced over 600,000 gold ounces (“Au oz.”), which is the 8th consecutive year over 500,000 Au oz.
- La Coipa had a strong fourth quarter with higher mill throughput and met full-year production guidance.
- U.S. Operations had another solid year, with production and costs on plan.
Development project and mineral reserves and resources highlights:
- Proceeding to construction at Phase X, Kettle River-Curlew (“Curlew”) and Redbird 2. Read more here.
- At Great Bear, surface construction for the Advanced Exploration (“AEX”) program is
80% complete. For the Main Project, detailed engineering is approximately35% complete, and the final phase of the federal Impact Statement submission is planned for the end of Q1 2026. - At Lobo-Marte, Kinross completed baseline studies and plans to submit its Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) by Q2 2026. Kinross also plans to provide a project update later this year.
- Reserves and Resources: Kinross added 1.2 million Au oz. (“Moz.”) to proven and probable mineral reserves, partially offsetting production depletion. Kinross increased measured and indicated resource estimates to 27.5 Moz. and increased inferred resource estimates to 16.6 Moz.
CEO Commentary:
J. Paul Rollinson, CEO, made the following comments in relation to 2025 fourth-quarter and year-end results:
“2025 marked another excellent year for Kinross. We met our guidance once again, delivered robust margins, and generated record free cash flow of
“We recently announced that we are proceeding with three U.S.-based projects, Phase X, Curlew and Redbird, which together are expected to contribute over
“We are carrying strong momentum into 2026 and are forecasting another strong year of production of approximately 2.0 million gold equivalent ounces. Our focus will be on margins and cash flow as we continue to hold the line on controllable costs while maintaining capital discipline as we execute on our grade enhancement strategy. We are planning to continue with our capital allocation strategy by reinvesting in our business, further strengthening our balance sheet, and returning capital to our shareholders. This includes investing an additional
Financial results
Summary of financial and operating results
| Three months ended | Years ended | |||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
| (in millions of U.S. dollars, except ounces, per share amounts, and per ounce amounts) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Operating Highlights(a) | ||||||||||||
| Total gold equivalent ounces(b) | ||||||||||||
| Produced | 489,671 | 514,355 | 2,069,910 | 2,170,791 | ||||||||
| Sold | 487,972 | 531,729 | 2,059,017 | 2,153,212 | ||||||||
| Attributable gold equivalent ounces(b) | ||||||||||||
| Produced | 483,582 | 501,209 | 2,012,106 | 2,128,052 | ||||||||
| Sold | 481,560 | 517,980 | 2,000,535 | 2,111,688 | ||||||||
| Gold ounces - sold | 479,347 | 522,389 | 2,026,570 | 2,100,621 | ||||||||
| Silver ounces - sold (000's) | 659 | 791 | 2,830 | 4,467 | ||||||||
| Earnings(a) | ||||||||||||
| Metal sales | $ | 2,023.0 | $ | 1,415.8 | $ | 7,051.1 | $ | 5,148.8 | ||||
| Production cost of sales | $ | 632.7 | $ | 583.8 | $ | 2,346.4 | $ | 2,197.1 | ||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | $ | 268.3 | $ | 284.8 | $ | 1,105.0 | $ | 1,147.5 | ||||
| Impairment reversal | $ | (116.1 | ) | $ | - | $ | (116.1 | ) | $ | (74.1 | ) | |
| Operating earnings | $ | 1,122.3 | $ | 501.1 | $ | 3,277.6 | $ | 1,540.3 | ||||
| Net earnings attributable to common shareholders | $ | 906.5 | $ | 275.6 | $ | 2,390.1 | $ | 948.8 | ||||
| Net earnings per share attributable to common shareholders (basic) | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1.96 | $ | 0.77 | ||||
| Net earnings per share attributable to common shareholders (diluted) | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 0.77 | ||||
| Adjusted net earnings(c) | $ | 809.3 | $ | 240.0 | $ | 2,243.9 | $ | 838.3 | ||||
| Adjusted net earnings per share(c) | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 1.84 | $ | 0.68 | ||||
| Cash Flow(a) | ||||||||||||
| Net cash flow provided from operating activities | $ | 1,146.9 | $ | 734.5 | $ | 3,760.5 | $ | 2,446.4 | ||||
| Attributable adjusted operating cash flow(c) | $ | 1,136.0 | $ | 677.0 | $ | 3,605.2 | $ | 2,293.9 | ||||
| Capital expenditures(d) | $ | 368.2 | $ | 280.7 | $ | 1,194.2 | $ | 1,075.5 | ||||
| Attributable capital expenditures(c) | $ | 361.7 | $ | 278.8 | $ | 1,175.2 | $ | 1,050.9 | ||||
| Attributable free cash flow(c) | $ | 769.4 | $ | 434.4 | $ | 2,473.5 | $ | 1,340.2 | ||||
| Per Ounce Metrics(a) | ||||||||||||
| Average realized gold price per ounce(e) | $ | 4,144 | $ | 2,663 | $ | 3,423 | $ | 2,393 | ||||
| Attributable average realized gold price per ounce(c) | $ | 4,144 | $ | 2,665 | $ | 3,426 | $ | 2,391 | ||||
| Production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold(b)(f) | $ | 1,297 | $ | 1,098 | $ | 1,140 | $ | 1,020 | ||||
| Attributable production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold(b)(c) | $ | 1,289 | $ | 1,096 | $ | 1,135 | $ | 1,021 | ||||
| Attributable production cost of sales per ounce sold on a by-product basis(c) | $ | 1,235 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 1,096 | $ | 988 | ||||
| Attributable all-in sustaining cost per equivalent ounce sold(b)(c) | $ | 1,825 | $ | 1,510 | $ | 1,571 | $ | 1,388 | ||||
| Attributable all-in sustaining cost per ounce sold on a by-product basis(c) | $ | 1,781 | $ | 1,490 | $ | 1,539 | $ | 1,365 | ||||
| Attributable all-in cost per equivalent ounce sold(b)(c) | $ | 2,343 | $ | 1,868 | $ | 1,989 | $ | 1,739 | ||||
| Attributable all-in cost per ounce sold on a by-product basis(c) | $ | 2,308 | $ | 1,854 | $ | 1,964 | $ | 1,725 | ||||
| (a) | All measures and ratios include |
| (b) | “Gold equivalent ounces” include silver ounces produced and sold converted to a gold equivalent based on a ratio of the average spot market prices for the commodities for each period. The ratio for the fourth quarter and full year 2025 was 76.34:1 and 86.29:1, respectively (fourth quarter and full year 2024 – 84.67:1 and 84.43:1, respectively). |
| (c) | The definition and reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures and ratios is included on pages 27 to 33 of this news release. Non-GAAP financial measures and ratios have no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. |
| (d) | “Capital expenditures” is “Additions to property, plant and equipment” on the consolidated statements of cash flows. |
| (e) | “Average realized gold price per ounce” is defined as gold revenue divided by total gold ounces sold. |
| (f) | “Production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold” is defined as production cost of sales divided by total gold equivalent ounces sold. |
The following operating and financial results are based on fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 gold equivalent production:
Production: Kinross produced 483,582 Au eq. oz. in Q4 2025, compared with 501,209 Au eq. oz. in Q4 2024.
Over the full year, Kinross produced 2,012,106 Au eq. oz., compared with full-year 2024 production of 2,128,052 Au eq. oz.
Average realized gold price11: The average realized gold price in Q4 2025 was
Revenue: During the fourth quarter, revenue increased to
Production cost of sales: Production cost of sales per Au eq. oz.2 sold was
Attributable production cost of sales per Au eq. oz.1 sold was
Attributable production cost of sales per Au oz. sold on a by-product basis1 was
Attributable production cost of sales per Au oz. sold on a by-product basis1 was
Margins4: Kinross delivered record margins in both comparable periods. Margins per Au eq. oz. sold increased by
Attributable all-in sustaining cost1: Attributable all-in sustaining cost per Au eq. oz. sold was
In Q4 2025, attributable all-in sustaining cost per Au oz. sold on a by-product basis1 was
Operating cash flow5: Kinross delivered record operating cash flow in both comparable periods. Operating cash flow was
Kinross delivered record attributable adjusted operating cash flow in both comparable periods. Attributable adjusted operating cash flow1 for Q4 2025 was
Attributable free cash flow1: Kinross delivered record attributable free cash flow in both comparable periods. Attributable free cash flow of
Earnings6: Kinross delivered record earnings in both comparable periods. Reported net earnings were
Kinross delivered record adjusted net earnings in both comparable periods. Adjusted net earnings7, 8 were
Capital expenditures3: Capital expenditures were
Attributable capital expenditures1 were
Balance sheet
During the quarter, Kinross repaid its outstanding
Moody’s Investors Service upgraded the senior unsecured rating of Kinross to Baa2 (stable) from Baa3 (positive).
As of December 31, 2025, Kinross had cash and cash equivalents of
The Company had additional available credit12 of
Capital allocation
In 2025, Kinross returned
Kinross will continue to maintain its disciplined approach to capital allocation, including strengthening its balance sheet, investing in its business and project pipeline, and returning capital to shareholders. The
Kinross’ Board of Directors has also approved a further
Operating results
Mine-by-mine summaries for 2025 fourth-quarter and full-year operating results may be found on pages 21 and 25 of this news release. Highlights include the following:
Tasiast delivered on its annual production and cost guidance. Primarily due to planned lower grades, full-year production decreased compared with 2024. Quarter-over-quarter production increased primarily due to higher grades. Cost of sales per ounce sold increased compared with 2024 and quarter-over-quarter primarily due to higher royalties driven by higher gold prices.
During the quarter, the Company successfully finalized a five-year collective labour agreement at Tasiast.
Paracatu performed well in 2025 as full-year production increased and cost of sales per ounce sold decreased compared with 2024 primarily due to the higher production. The higher production was a result of planned higher grades, higher recoveries and the timing of ounces processed through the mill, partially offset by a decrease in throughput.
Production increased quarter-over-quarter due to higher grades, higher recoveries and the timing of ounces processed through the mill, partially offset by lower throughput, consistent with mine plan sequencing. Cost of sales per ounce sold increased quarter-over-quarter due to lower throughput and higher royalties driven by higher gold prices.
La Coipa delivered on its full-year production guidance and had its strongest quarter of the year with increased throughput through the mill. Primarily as a result of planned mine sequencing, full-year production decreased compared with 2024. Quarter-over-quarter production increased primarily due to stronger mill throughput. Full-year cost of sales per ounce sold was higher mainly due to higher royalties, labour and contractor costs. Cost of sales per ounce sold decreased quarter-over-quarter mainly as a result of the increase in production. Kinross continues to progress permitting work for mine life extensions at the operation.
During the quarter, the Company successfully finalized a two-year collective labour agreement at La Coipa.
Annual production at Fort Knox increased compared with 2024 due to a full year of production from higher-grade, higher-recovery ore from Manh Choh, partially offset by a decrease in throughput. Cost of sales per ounce sold increased year-over-year, primarily due to higher royalties and maintenance costs. Quarter-over-quarter, production decreased due to planned mine sequencing, including fewer tonnes of higher-grade Manh Choh ore processed,
and cost of sales per ounce sold increased due to the decrease in production.
At Round Mountain, full-year production decreased compared with 2024 per planned mine sequencing as the site transitioned from Phase W to the start of Phase S ore in Q3 2025, with lower mill grades, and fewer ounces stacked and recovered from the heap leach pads. Full-year cost of sales per ounce sold increased compared with 2024 primarily due to the decrease in ounces sold. Quarter-over-quarter, production decreased due to planned lower grades and reduced stacking on the heap leach pads per mine plan sequencing. Cost of sales per ounce sold increased quarter-over-quarter due to higher cost ounces from the heap leach pads and blending of higher-grade mill ore with lower-grade stockpiles.
At Bald Mountain, full-year production and cost of sales per ounce sold was in line with 2024. Quarter-over-quarter, production was lower due to planned mine sequencing, and cost of sales per ounce sold increased due to higher royalties and lower production.
Development projects
Kinross was pleased to announce construction decisions in January 2026 for Round Mountain Phase X, Curlew and Bald Mountain Redbird 2. These projects are expected to contribute 3 million ounces of production at attractive economics and extend mine lives in Nevada well into the 2030s. Together, the projects have an Internal Rate of Return13 of
In 2022, Kinross initiated a portfolio and grade enhancement strategy that is expected to provide organic offsets to inflation pressures. The implementation began with the completion of the Tasiast 21k and 24k mill expansions, and the restart of the La Coipa mine, increasing the proportion of higher-grade mill feed in the portfolio. Following these portfolio enhancements, Manh Choh came online in 2024, contributing high-grade production at Fort Knox.
Higher-grade underground mining at Phase X and Curlew are expected to benefit long-term costs within Kinross’ U.S. portfolio. These three projects are expected to start contributing in 2028, coinciding with getting back into higher-grade mining at Tasiast. Looking to the end of the decade and into the early 2030s, with strong grades and low costs, Great Bear and Lobo-Marte are expected to contribute to the next phases of the Company’s grade enhancement strategy.
The announcement is available here.
Great Bear
At Great Bear, Kinross continues to progress its AEX program alongside permitting, detailed engineering and procurement of major equipment for the Main Project.
For AEX, surface construction is currently
For the Main Project, detailed engineering is advancing well and is approximately
Federally, the second of three phased submissions for the Project’s Impact Statement was submitted on schedule in December. The third and final submission remains on track for the end of Q1 2026. In addition to the Impact Statement, Kinross has advanced other federal Main Project permits, with technical documents submitted to Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada during the quarter.
Provincially, the Company is also advancing Main Project permitting and pleased to report that the Ontario Minister of Energy and Mines officially designated the Great Bear Main Project for inclusion in its streamlined One Project, One Process (“1P1P”) permitting framework, which is expected to provide a more coordinated and integrated approach to Ontario’s mining project authorizations, permitting and Indigenous community consultation. Kinross is supportive of this streamlined approach and expects it will help facilitate Great Bear's targeted first gold production in late 2029.
Lobo-Marte
Kinross has completed baseline studies to support the Environmental Impact Assessment for the Lobo-Marte project and plans to submit it by Q2 2026. Kinross also plans to provide a project update later this year. Lobo-Marte continues to be a potential large, low-cost mine with the potential to contribute to the portfolio in the early 2030s.
Company Guidance
The following section of the news release represents forward-looking information and users are cautioned that actual results may vary. We refer to the risks and assumptions contained in the Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information on pages 41 and 42 of this news release.
This Company Guidance section below references attributable production cost of sales per equivalent ounce, attributable all-in sustaining cost per equivalent ounce sold, and sustaining, non-sustaining and attributable capital expenditures, which are non-GAAP ratios and financial measures, as applicable, with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. The definitions of these non-GAAP ratios and financial measures and comparable reconciliations are included on pages 27 to 33 of this news release.
Production guidance
In 2026, Kinross expects to produce 2.0 million attributable Au eq. oz.15 (+/-
| Annual attributable1 gold equivalent production guidance (+/- | |
| 2026 | 2.0 million oz. |
| 2027 | 2.0 million oz. |
| 2028 | 2.0 million oz. |
Cost guidance
Attributable production cost of sales1 is expected to be
The Company expects its attributable all-in sustaining cost1 to be
2026 production and cost guidance
| Q4 2025 results | 2025 full-year results | 2026 guidance (+/- | ||
| Gold equivalent basis | ||||
| Production (Au eq. oz.) | 483,582 | 2.0 million | 2.0 million11 | |
| Attributable production cost of sales per Au eq. oz. sold1 | ||||
| Production cost of sales per Au eq. oz. sold2 | - | |||
| Attributable all-in sustaining cost per Au eq. oz. sold1 | ||||
2026 attributable1 production and cost guidance by country
| Country | 2026 attributable production guidance (Au eq. oz.)1, 15 (+/- | Percentage of total forecast production16 | 2026 attributable production cost of sales guidance (per Au eq. oz. sold)1 (+/- | 2025 production cost of sales (per Au eq. oz. sold)2 | 2025 attributable production cost of sales (per Au eq. oz. sold)1 | |||
| Mauritania | 505,000 | |||||||
| Brazil | 600,000 | |||||||
| Chile | 210,000 | |||||||
| United States | 685,000 | |||||||
| TOTAL | 2.0 million | 100% | $1,360 | $1,140 | $1,135 | |||
Material assumptions used to forecast 2026 guidance, most notably relating to production cost of sales, are as follows:
- a gold price of
$4,500 per ounce; - a silver price of
$65 per ounce; - an oil price of
$70 per barrel; - foreign exchange rates of:
- 5.25 Brazilian reais to the U.S. dollar;
- 940 Chilean pesos to the U.S. dollar;
- 40 Mauritanian ouguiyas to the U.S. dollar; and
- 1.38 Canadian dollars to the U.S. dollar;
Taking into account existing currency and oil hedges:
- a
10% change in foreign currency exchange rates17 would be expected to result in an approximate$30 impact on attributable production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold1; - specific to the Brazilian real, a
10% change in this exchange rate would be expected to result in an approximate$50 impact on Brazilian attributable production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold1; - specific to the Chilean peso, a
10% change in this exchange rate would be expected to result in an approximate$50 impact on Chilean attributable production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold1; - a
$10 per barrel change in the price of oil would be expected to result in an approximate$3 impact on fuel consumption costs on attributable production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold1; and - a
$100 change in the price of gold would be expected to result in an approximate$5 impact on attributable production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold1 as a result of a change in royalties.
Attributable capital expenditures18 guidance
Attributable capital expenditures for 2026 are forecast to be approximately
Kinross’ attributable capital expenditures outlook for 2027 and 2028 is expected to be in line with 2026, subject to ongoing inflationary impacts and project opportunities currently under study, which have the potential to contribute in the 2030s.
Country | Forecast 2026 sustaining capital18 (+/- (attributable) (million) | Forecast 2026 non-sustaining capital18 (+/- (attributable) (million) | Total 2026 forecast capital18 (+/- (attributable) (million) | 2025 sustaining capital18 (million) | 2025 non-sustaining capital18 (million) | 2025 total capital18 (consolidated) (million) | 2025 total capital18 (attributable) (million) | ||||
| Mauritania | |||||||||||
| Brazil | $- | ||||||||||
| Chile | |||||||||||
| U.S. | |||||||||||
| Canada and other | $- | $- | |||||||||
| TOTAL | |||||||||||
2026 sustaining capital18 includes the following forecast spending estimates:
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
2026 non-sustaining capital18 includes the following forecast spending estimates:
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Other 2026 guidance
| Category | 2026 Guidance | Summary | |
| Exploration and Business Development ($M) | 2026 guidance includes approximately For details about the 2026 exploration program, see page 18. | ||
| General and Administrative ($M) | In line with 2025 results. | ||
| Other Operating Costs ($M) | Primarily relates to studies and permitting activities that do not meet the criteria for capitalization, as well as care and maintenance and reclamation activities at non-operating sites. | ||
| Effective Tax Rate (ETR)19 | ETR based on adjusted net earnings. | ||
| Taxes paid (cash) ($M) | Taxes paid is expected to increase by approximately Includes approximately | ||
| DD&A ($/oz.)20 | In line with 2025 results. | ||
| Interest paid ($M) | Total interest incurred is expected to be | ||
Sustainability
Kinross continued to advance its Sustainability priorities in 2025, delivering meaningful progress across energy efficiency, community partnerships and governance. The Company maintained its strong position with external Sustainability rankings, including its leading position in the S&P Corporate Sustainability Assessment.
During the year, the Company completed its 2025 energy efficiency program, delivering an estimated
Across operating regions, Kinross delivered tangible social benefits to local communities. Kinross Chile was recognized as the Best Company of Atacama 2025 for its stakeholder engagement and social investment programs. In Alaska, Fort Knox committed
Kinross maintained its focus on strong governance standards for its Board of Directors, including welcoming a new Board Chair and two new Board members in 2025. Kinross was, once again, the top scoring mining Company in The Globe and Mail’s annual corporate governance ranking, placing in the top
Exploration update
In 2025, approximately 275,000 metres of drilling was completed for all exploration projects (brownfields, minex and greenfields).
Brownfields and minex exploration
The Company’s brownfields and minex exploration efforts – which accounted for approximately
Great Bear
In 2025 exploration at Great Bear shifted to focus on regional exploration work on the ~120 square kilometre land package to look for additional open pit and underground opportunities, and approximately 62,000 metres were drilled.
Exploration has generated encouraging results stepping out up to 1.8 kilometres along strike of the main LP zone, both to the northwest and southeast.
- BR-952: 2.2m @ 12.1 g/t Au
- BR-959: 1.7m @ 10.2 g/t Au
- BR-941: 1.0m @ 64.1 g/t Au
- BR-941: 1.7m @ 5.94 g/t Au
- REG-25-110: 0.6m @ 14.20 g/t Au
There were also encouraging results on the broader land package outside of the main LP trend:
- REG-25-131: 1.0m @ 1.99 g/t Au
- REG-25-137: 0.5m @ 11.60 g/t Au
- DL25-150A: 8.9m @ 4.83 g/t Au
These areas will be followed up in the 2026 drilling program, which includes approximately 55,000 metres of planned drilling.
Additionally, prospecting and mapping on the Red Lake North property, located 66 kilometres from the Great Bear property, has identified shear hosted, mineralized quartz veining that can be traced for over 1 kilometre in length. Highlights from grab samples include values of 7.9 g/t, 13.9 g/t and 65.3 g/t gold. Detailed mapping and sampling, and drilling will be conducted in 2026 to follow up on these positive initial results.
Round Mountain
In 2025, work at Round Mountain was focused on underground infill drilling of the Phase X exploration target, which confirmed good grades and robust widths within the target zone and defined a significant initial mineral reserve of approximately 1.2 Moz., and initial mineral resource of 0.2 Moz. of measured and indicated, and 0.5 Moz. of inferred. Approximately 28,000 metres were drilled underground at Phase X.
Highlights from Phase X underground drilling campaign:
- RX-0030: 140m @ 4.4 g/t Au Eq.
- RX-0031: 58m @ 5.8 g/t Au Eq.
- RX-0032: 23m @ 37.5 g/t Au Eq.
- RX-0034: 29m @ 24.1 g/t Au Eq.
- RX-0064: 105m @ 4.1 g/t Au Eq.
- DX-0117: 125m @ 5.4 g/t Au Eq.
- DX-0125: 223m @ 2.7 g/t Au Eq.
The Company also received results from step out drilling ~220 metres down dip and along plunge of the Phase X resource, showing mineralization with similar grades and widths to the initial resource with RX-0105 intersecting 68 metres at 3.1 g/t, supporting the hypothesis that this system extends significantly down dip and highlighting potential for further resource and mine plan additions.
In 2026, Kinross plans to focus exploration at Phase X on proximal and down dip extensions of the resource, alongside further infill drilling of the lower zone and surface exploration targeting future open pit extensions on the broader land package.
Curlew
The 2025 drilling program at Curlew included approximately 14,000 metres of underground drilling. Exploration development was also driven to establish more efficient drilling platforms in both the North Stealth and Roadrunner zones.
Drilling in the North Stealth zone was focused on expanding inferred high-grade mineralization, as well as infill drilling of areas that will be targeted in the early years of the mine plan.
Program highlights from assays received in 2025 include:
- N. Stealth-1221 – 10.0m @ 16.4 g/t Au
- N. Stealth-1554 – 10.4m @ 11.7 g/t Au
- K5-1261 – 25.7m @ 7.8 g/t Au
- K5-1522 – 6.9m @ 8.9 g/t Au
- K2N-1482 – 11.7m @ 10.4 g/t Au
In 2026, Kinross plans to focus on expanding areas of wide, higher-grade mineralization proximal to North Stealth and in the Roadrunner area down dip with potential to augment the life of mine plan, alongside infill drilling across the property in preparation for the initial years of mining.
Alaska
At Fort Knox, approximately 29,000 metres of drilling in 2025 focused on growth at two main target areas: the area proximal to the satellite Gil pit, and growth opportunities proximal to the Fort Knox pit, which may offer potential to augment medium-term production plans at Fort Knox
Gil highlights include:
- GPC25-902 – 16.8m @ 2.9 g/t Au
- GR25-915 – 6.1m @ 4.4 g/t Au
- GC25-925 – 14.0m @ 3.4 g/t Au
- GC25-933 – 6.9m @ 8.8 g/t Au
Fort Knox highlights include:
- FFR25-1923 – 4.6m @ 7.7 g/t Au
- FFC25-1957 – 7.4m @ 2.71 g/t Au
- FFC25-1958 – 17.3m @ 2.0 g/t Au
- FFC25-1958 – 4.9m @ 33.0 g/t Au
In 2026, drilling at Fort Knox will continue to focus on growth opportunities proximal to the Gil and Fort Knox pits.
Bald Mountain
At Bald Mountain, drilling in 2025 targeted both the north and south areas of existing operations. Approximately 26,000 metres of drilling was completed covering exploration and infill targets.
As a result of strong near mine exploration and progression of project studies, Bald Mountain converted approximately 200,000 Au. oz. to reserves, largely driven by near-pit exploration, more than offsetting production depletion.
Highlights for the exploration campaign beyond the reserve conversion included positive results at both the Rat and Top target areas.
Highlights from Rat and Top:
- RRD25-001: 12.0m @ 12.7 g/t
- RRD25-002: 16.0m @ 10.4 g/t
- RRD25-005: 7.5m @ 2.7 g/t
- TC25-002: 4.6m @ 6.4 g/t
- TC25-001: 39.6m @ 1.2 g/t
In 2026, Kinross plans to target near mine growth opportunities at several of the existing Bald Mountain open pits as well as advancing drilling on other satellite target opportunities.
Tasiast
At Tasiast, approximately 44,000 metres of drilling were completed in 2025. Drill testing of the West Branch orebody continued at depth throughout the year, providing additional data to support the assessment of future underground mining potential. The program intersected several broad, well-mineralized zones down plunge of the current West Branch underground resource, which includes 1.8 Moz. These results extend mineralization approximately 1,800 metres along strike and down plunge, confirming strong continuity beyond current resource boundaries.
Figure 1: Strong underground potential at Tasiast West Branch

A figure accompanying this announcement is available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/9e234095-d7e9-4205-bf62-c28bd4ba6792
Highlighted intercepts from West Branch deep drilling:
- TA17263DD: 23m @ 2.8 g/t Au
- TA17266DD: 7m @ 2.3 g/t Au
- TA17266DD: 27m @ 2.3 g/t Au
- TA17271ADD: 20m @ 2.1 g/t Au
- TA17274DD: 19m @ 2.3 g/t Au
- TA17275DD: 15m @ 1.2 g/t Au
- TA17258DD: 35m @ 2.0 g/t Au
In addition to the reserve additions at Fennec, Kinross also advanced exploration across other target areas, including C68, Piment and Prolongation. While further drilling is required to fully define these targets, results to date are encouraging and indicate continued exploration upside.
Highlighted intercepts include:
- TA17268ADD: 6m @ 2.5 g/t Au
- TA17268ADD: 7m @ 1.7 g/t Au
- TA17273ADD: 6m @ 2.0 g/t Au
- TA17277DD: 6m @ 1.4 g/t Au
- TA17280DD: 5m @ 1.5 g/t Au
- TA17281DD: 8m @ 1.3 g/t Au
- TA17281DD: 3m @ 1.3 g/t Au
Drilling in 2026 will focus on following up on 2025 results at the satellite open pit ore bodies and extending underground targets at depth.
Chile
At La Coipa, the 2025 drilling program completed approximately 12,000 metres of drilling across multiple deposits further defining existing trends within the La Coipa area of operations, targeting extensions of previously mined orebodies.
Drill results in the Puren area, where we are currently mining and which includes our next planned layback at La Coipa were encouraging, including:
- PUR-037A: 10m @ 1.9 g/t Au & 31 g/t Ag
- PUR-037A: 16m @ 1.3 g/t Au & 146 g/t Ag
- PUR-037A: 10m @ 2.0 g/t Au & 11 g/t Ag
- PUR-036: 10m @ 0.03 g/t Au & 181 g/t Ag
- PUR-035: 14m @ 1.3 g/t Au & 6.8 g/t Ag
- PUR-034: 14m @ 2.9 g/t Au & 4.4 g/t Ag
- PUR-032: 44m @ 1.2 g/t Au & 15.3 g/t Ag
- PUR-031: 32m @ 1.4g/t Au & 138 g/t Ag
Drill results in closer proximity to Phase 7 (Pompeya) pit which we are also currently mining were also encouraging, including:
- CAT-123: 20m @ 1.1 g/t & 10 g/t Ag
- CAT-122: 16m @ 1.0 g/t Au & 37 g/t Ag
Drilling in 2026 will focus on growth opportunities, following up the 2025 near mine successes around the existing La Coipa operations and planned future laybacks.
Brazil
Brownfields exploration in 2025 focused on the large licenses south of and adjacent to the Paracatu mine. Approximately 9,000 metres of drilling was completed. Drilling showing similar style of mineralization to Paracatu will be followed up on in 2026. New gold in soil anomalies and induced polarization geophysics anomalies identified in 2025 will also be drill tested in 2026.
The 2025 minex campaign focused on several near mine opportunities, including the south pile, southwest expansion, and the northeast target areas.
Together with mine design optimization, resource drilling supported the addition of 700,000 Au oz. to reserves in 2025, nearly offsetting production depletion.
Greenfields exploration update
The greenfields exploration strategy is to identify high potential geological units that have the right age, structural complexity and potential to host high-grade gold mineralization. The Company looks for opportunities where it can stake its own claims or collaborate with high-quality junior exploration companies through either joint venture agreements or via equity investment. The primary focus is exploring for orogenic, epithermal, Carlin and intrusion related gold and gold-copper style deposits.
The greenfields exploration programs in 2025 were focused on targets located in Canada, the U.S.A. and Finland with approximately 40,000 metres of drilling completed on all projects.
Canada
Exploration in Canada was primarily on the large land holdings in Snow Lake, Manitoba, where Kinross has
High-grade gold was discovered on the SLG property through prospecting and mapping. Sampling along a 1.0 kilometre length returned gold grades of 73.1 g/t, 16.8 g/t, 16.5 g/t, 16.3g/t, 16.0 g/t, 14.2 g/t, 11.7 g/t and 10.9 g/t. Drill testing of this prospective trend will take place in the winter of 2026.
Kinross conducted the first drill program on the McCafferty property during the fourth quarter of 2025. The drilling successfully intersected the target vein with the deepest intercept occurring at ~200m below surface. Preliminary highlights of the drilling are as follows:
- MCA25-002: 2.9m @ 16.9 g/t Au
- MCA25-003: 4.0m @ 5.4 g/t Au
- MCA25-005: 2.0m @ 17.5 g/t Au
- MCA25-006: 4.0m @ 33.7 g/t Au
Outside of Manitoba, Kinross has
In October 2025, the company became the operator of the joint venture properties in New Brunswick under option with Puma Resources. Work consisted of prospecting, mapping and drilling on the Williams Brook property at the Lynx Zone where gold rich quartz veining has been identified and was reported by the joint venture company.
Kinross will continue to advance this area and drill test other known showings starting with a winter 2026 drilling program followed by mapping and prospecting throughout the spring and summer that will be followed up with a late summer to fall drilling campaign.
U.S.A.
Kinross holds a number of projects in Nevada that are either
Since 2024, the company has been in a joint venture was with Riley Gold Corporation on its PWC project, which is contiguous with the western boundary of Nevada Gold Mines’ Pipeline Complex. In 2025 Kinross completed two diamond drill holes, designed to test for favourable lower plate carbonate Carlin-type host rocks. The highlight of the program was reported by Riley Gold in a press release dated November 24, 2025, in which they announced a 149 metre core intercept at 0.09 g/t gold in hole PW25-03 confirming the presence of Carlin type disseminated gold mineralization. Other high-grade results in the hole occur along faults that are interpreted to have acted as fluid conduits carrying gold up from lower plate hosted mineralization.
Work in 2026 will follow-up on the exciting results at PWC and advance exploration on the other projects.
Finland
Kinross actively explored its projects in the Central Lapland Greenstone Belt a greenstone belt of similar scale to the Abitibi that has had limited historical gold exploration and development. Kinross’ land positions are proximal to Agnico Eagle’s Kittilä gold mine and Rupert Resource’s Ikkari gold deposit, which reported more than 4 million ounces at 2.2 g/t Au in indicated resources.
Work in 2025 included approximately 15,000 metres of drilling on the projects, of which 11,000 metres was base-of-till drilling and is used to test the surface of bedrock under cover for gold anomalies. Base-of-till drilling was used successfully in the discoveries of Agnico Eagle’s Kittilä gold mine and Rupert Resource’s Ikkari gold deposit.
Work will continue on the joint venture ground in 2026 and advance the other projects through base-of-till drilling, mapping and prospecting and diamond drilling of the highest priority anomalies.
2026 Focus
2026 exploration expenditure guidance (brownfields, minex and greenfields) is
Priority exploration projects:
- At Great Bear, focus on the discovery of new open pit and underground targets outside of the LP, Hinge and Limb areas on Kinross’ 120 square kilometre land package.
- At Curlew, delineate and extend zones of high-grade mineralization at North Stealth, and Roadrunner.
- At Round Mountain, explore for proximal and down dip extensions of the initial resource while continuing infill drilling of the lower zone at Phase X.
- At Fort Knox, focus on extension opportunities in proximity to both the Gil and Fort Knox open pits.
- At Tasiast, continue to demonstrate continuity at depth and extend underground resources at West Branch while progressing further exploration of multiple satellite targets on the large TMLSA land package.
- In Chile, drill test a number of greenfields and brownfields projects, targeting both porphyry and high sulphidation epithermal styles of mineralization as well as extensions of known oxide deposits.
- At Paracatu, continue testing targets along the mine trend and advance greenfields exploration regionally.
- In Canada, advance exploration at Snow Lake in Manitoba, on the Red Lake North property in Ontario, and through the Puma Resources joint venture in New Brunswick.
Full drill results are available here: www.kinross.com/Exploration-Drill-Results-Appendix-A-Q4-YE-2025
2025 Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources update
(See the Company’s detailed Annual Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Statement estimated as at December 31, 2025 and explanatory notes starting at page 35.)
Kinross increased its gold price assumptions from
The Company also increased its silver price assumptions to
Kinross continues to prioritize quality, high-margin, low-cost ounces in its portfolio, and maintained its fully loaded costing methodology with the objective of converting to reserves.
| Kinross Gold Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates22 | |||||
| 2024 (Au koz.) | Depletion (Au koz.) | Geology & Engineering (Au koz.) | 2025 (Au koz.) | ||
Proven and Probable Reserves | 21,857 | (2,131) | 1,217 | 20,942 | |
Measured and Indicated Resources | 25,867 | (33) | 1,666 | 27,499 | |
Inferred Resources | 13,193 | (42) | 3,482 | 16,633 | |
Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
Kinross’ total estimated proven and probable gold reserves at December 31, 2025, were approximately 20.9 million ounces, a decrease of
Paracatu added 700,000 Au oz. to reserves before depletion through mine design optimizations and exploration nearly offsetting production depletion.
Bald Mountain added 200,000 Au oz. to reserves before depletion driven by conversion of resources to reserves along with the Redbird 2 and satellites project approvals.
Tasiast added 200,000 Au oz. to reserves before depletion driven by additions within the existing reserve pit design at West Branch and further additions to reserves at the Fennec satellite pit.
Round Mountain’s 2025 reserve update reflects the transition to the Phase X underground. Higher margin underground reserves (3.2 g/t) replaced lower margin open pit reserves (0.8 g/t), adding approximately 100,000 Au oz. to reserves before depletion, and driving improved value, margins and returns, with a significantly higher IRR and NPV. The higher-grade component of Phase W resource converted to underground reserve. The remaining lower grade open pit resource with high strip ratio was removed, improving the quality of the overall resource. Phase X underground extends mine life by eight years to 2038. Underground mining also has significant potential to extend resources with lower incremental capital relative to open pit expansions with potential extensions of mineralization down-dip.
Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources
Kinross’ total measured and indicated mineral resource estimate increased by
Inferred Mineral Resources
Kinross’ total inferred mineral resource estimate increased by
Conference call details
In connection with this news release, Kinross will hold a conference call and audio webcast on Thursday, February 19, 2026, at 8:00 a.m. ET to discuss the results, followed by a question-and-answer session. To access the call, please dial:
Canada & US toll-free – +1 (888) 596-4144; Conference ID : 9425112
Outside of Canada & US – +1 (646) 968-2525; Conference ID: 9425112
Replay (available up to 14 days after the call):
Canada & US toll-free – +1 (800) 770-2030; Conference ID: 9425112 #
Outside of Canada & US – +1 (609) 800-9909; Conference ID: 9425112 #
You may also access the conference call on a listen-only basis via webcast at our website www.kinross.com. The audio webcast will be archived on www.kinross.com.
This release should be read in conjunction with Kinross’ 2025 year-end Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis report at www.kinross.com. Kinross’ 2025 year-end Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis have been filed with Canadian securities regulators (available at www.sedarplus.ca) and furnished with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (available at www.sec.gov). Kinross shareholders may obtain a copy of the financial statements free of charge upon request to the Company.
About Kinross Gold Corporation
Kinross is a Canadian-based global senior gold mining company with operations and projects in the United States, Brazil, Mauritania, Chile and Canada. Our focus is on delivering value based on the core principles of responsible mining, operational excellence, disciplined growth, and balance sheet strength. Kinross maintains listings on the Toronto Stock Exchange (symbol: K) and the New York Stock Exchange (symbol: KGC).
Media Contact
Samantha Sheffield
Director, Corporate Communications
phone: 416-365-3034
Samantha.Sheffield@Kinross.com
Investor Relations Contact
David Shaver
Senior Vice-President, Investor Relations & Communications
phone: 416-365-2854
InvestorRelations@Kinross.com
Review of operations
| Three months ended December 31, | Gold equivalent ounces | |||||||||||||||||
| Produced | Sold | Production cost of sales ($millions) | Production cost of sales/equivalent ounce sold | |||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| Tasiast | 125,625 | 139,411 | 118,912 | 144,041 | 119.2 | 104.4 | 1,002 | 725 | ||||||||||
| Paracatu | 155,048 | 123,899 | 154,565 | 124,690 | 165.0 | 131.6 | 1,068 | 1,055 | ||||||||||
| La Coipa | 67,319 | 58,533 | 71,419 | 57,852 | 80.7 | 68.2 | 1,130 | 1,179 | ||||||||||
| Fort Knox | 71,523 | 104,901 | 74,294 | 108,512 | 125.8 | 141.0 | 1,693 | 1,299 | ||||||||||
| Round Mountain | 31,754 | 42,969 | 31,641 | 45,342 | 86.6 | 80.0 | 2,737 | 1,764 | ||||||||||
| Bald Mountain | 38,402 | 44,642 | 37,141 | 51,291 | 55.4 | 58.7 | 1,492 | 1,144 | ||||||||||
| United States Total | 141,679 | 192,512 | 143,076 | 205,145 | 267.8 | 279.7 | 1,872 | 1,363 | ||||||||||
| Less: Manh Choh non-controlling interest ( | (6,089 | ) | (13,146 | ) | (6,412 | ) | (13,749 | ) | (12.2 | ) | (15.9 | ) | ||||||
| United States Attributable Total | 135,590 | 179,366 | 136,664 | 191,396 | 255.6 | 263.8 | 1,870 | 1,378 | ||||||||||
| Operations Total(a) | 489,671 | 514,355 | 487,972 | 531,729 | 632.7 | 583.8 | 1,297 | 1,098 | ||||||||||
| Attributable Total(a) | 483,582 | 501,209 | 481,560 | 517,980 | 620.5 | 567.9 | 1,289 | 1,096 | ||||||||||
| Years ended December 31, | Gold equivalent ounces | |||||||||||||||||
| Produced | Sold | Production cost of sales ($millions) | Production cost of sales/equivalent ounce sold | |||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| Tasiast | 503,429 | 622,394 | 486,401 | 609,614 | 430.2 | 415.4 | 884 | 681 | ||||||||||
| Paracatu | 601,318 | 528,574 | 600,110 | 528,209 | 587.1 | 548.6 | 978 | 1,039 | ||||||||||
| La Coipa | 231,770 | 246,131 | 235,233 | 241,077 | 284.2 | 231.3 | 1,208 | 959 | ||||||||||
| Fort Knox | 410,822 | 377,258 | 417,104 | 375,402 | 558.6 | 452.5 | 1,339 | 1,205 | ||||||||||
| Round Mountain | 143,402 | 215,387 | 142,739 | 214,996 | 273.8 | 328.3 | 1,918 | 1,527 | ||||||||||
| Bald Mountain | 179,169 | 181,047 | 177,430 | 182,760 | 212.5 | 220.3 | 1,198 | 1,205 | ||||||||||
| United States Total | 733,393 | 773,692 | 737,273 | 773,158 | 1,044.9 | 1,001.1 | 1,417 | 1,295 | ||||||||||
| Less: Manh Choh non-controlling interest ( | (57,804 | ) | (42,739 | ) | (58,482 | ) | (41,524 | ) | (76.7 | ) | (40.8 | ) | ||||||
| United States Attributable Total | 675,589 | 730,953 | 678,791 | 731,634 | 968.2 | 960.3 | 1,426 | 1,313 | ||||||||||
| Operations Total(a) | 2,069,910 | 2,170,791 | 2,059,017 | 2,153,212 | 2,346.4 | 2,197.1 | 1,140 | 1,020 | ||||||||||
| Attributable Total(a) | 2,012,106 | 2,128,052 | 2,000,535 | 2,111,688 | 2,269.7 | 2,156.3 | 1,135 | 1,021 | ||||||||||
| (a) Totals include immaterial sales and related costs from Maricunga for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024. | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated balance sheets
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except share amounts) | |||||||||
| As at | |||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||
| Current assets | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,742.3 | $ | 611.5 | |||||
| Restricted cash | 13.5 | 10.2 | |||||||
| Accounts receivable and prepaid assets | 145.8 | 257.3 | |||||||
| Inventories | 1,370.3 | 1,243.2 | |||||||
| Other current assets | 16.6 | 4.5 | |||||||
| 3,288.5 | 2,126.7 | ||||||||
| Non-current assets | |||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 8,289.4 | 7,968.6 | |||||||
| Long-term investments | 99.3 | 51.9 | |||||||
| Other long-term assets | 708.9 | 713.1 | |||||||
| Deferred tax assets | 25.0 | 5.3 | |||||||
| Total assets | $ | 12,411.1 | $ | 10,865.6 | |||||
| Liabilities | |||||||||
| Current liabilities | |||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 716.4 | $ | 543.0 | |||||
| Current income tax payable | 595.7 | 236.7 | |||||||
| Current portion of long-term debt | - | 199.9 | |||||||
| Current portion of provisions | 74.2 | 62.5 | |||||||
| Other current liabilities | 13.3 | 18.0 | |||||||
| 1,399.6 | 1,060.1 | ||||||||
| Non-current liabilities | |||||||||
| Long-term debt | 738.2 | 1,235.5 | |||||||
| Provisions | 976.6 | 941.5 | |||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | 64.8 | 78.9 | |||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | 537.8 | 549.0 | |||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | 3,717.0 | $ | 3,865.0 | |||||
| Equity | |||||||||
| Common shareholders' equity | |||||||||
| Common share capital | $ | 4,382.0 | $ | 4,487.3 | |||||
| Contributed surplus | 10,137.6 | 10,643.0 | |||||||
| Accumulated deficit | (5,943.3 | ) | (8,181.3 | ) | |||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (0.3 | ) | (87.4 | ) | |||||
| Total common shareholders' equity | 8,576.0 | 6,861.6 | |||||||
| Non-controlling interests | 118.1 | 139.0 | |||||||
| Total equity | $ | 8,694.1 | $ | 7,000.6 | |||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 12,411.1 | $ | 10,865.6 | |||||
| Common shares | |||||||||
| Authorized | Unlimited | Unlimited | |||||||
| Issued and outstanding | 1,199,843,037 | 1,229,125,606 | |||||||
Consolidated statements of operations
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||
| Years ended | ||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||
| Metal sales | $ | 7,051.1 | $ | 5,148.8 | ||||||
| Cost of sales | ||||||||||
| Production cost of sales | 2,346.4 | 2,197.1 | ||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 1,105.0 | 1,147.5 | ||||||||
| Impairment reversal | (116.1 | ) | (74.1 | ) | ||||||
| Total cost of sales | 3,335.3 | 3,270.5 | ||||||||
| Gross profit | 3,715.8 | 1,878.3 | ||||||||
| Other operating expense | 93.9 | 14.0 | ||||||||
| Exploration and business development | 204.4 | 197.8 | ||||||||
| General and administrative | 139.9 | 126.2 | ||||||||
| Operating earnings | 3,277.6 | 1,540.3 | ||||||||
| Other (expense) income - net | (24.6 | ) | 14.3 | |||||||
| Finance income | 73.0 | 18.2 | ||||||||
| Finance expense | (131.3 | ) | (91.4 | ) | ||||||
| Earnings before tax | 3,194.7 | 1,481.4 | ||||||||
| Income tax expense - net | (724.7 | ) | (487.4 | ) | ||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 2,470.0 | $ | 994.0 | ||||||
| Net earnings attributable to: | ||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests | $ | 79.9 | $ | 45.2 | ||||||
| Common shareholders | $ | 2,390.1 | $ | 948.8 | ||||||
| Earnings per share attributable to common shareholders | ||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 1.96 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||
| Diluted | $ | 1.95 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||
Consolidated statements of cash flows
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||
| Years ended | ||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||
| Net inflow (outflow) of cash related to the following activities: | ||||||||||
| Operating: | ||||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 2,470.0 | $ | 994.0 | ||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided from operating activities: | ||||||||||
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 1,105.0 | 1,147.5 | ||||||||
| Impairment reversal | (116.1 | ) | (74.1 | ) | ||||||
| Share-based compensation expense | 13.1 | 9.0 | ||||||||
| Finance expense - net | 90.1 | 73.2 | ||||||||
| Income tax expense - net | 724.7 | 487.4 | ||||||||
| Gain on sale of Asante Gold Corporation holdings | (63.0 | ) | - | |||||||
| Foreign exchange losses (gains) | 5.7 | (13.8 | ) | |||||||
| Other | 2.0 | (44.1 | ) | |||||||
| Reclamation payments, net of reclamation (recovery) expense | (92.3 | ) | (22.3 | ) | ||||||
| Changes in working capital: | ||||||||||
| Accounts receivable and other assets | 9.5 | 27.5 | ||||||||
| Inventories | (83.9 | ) | 14.3 | |||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 114.1 | 26.0 | ||||||||
| Cash flow provided from operating activities | 4,178.9 | 2,624.6 | ||||||||
| Income taxes paid | (418.4 | ) | (178.2 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash flow provided from operating activities | 3,760.5 | 2,446.4 | ||||||||
| Investing: | ||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment | (1,194.2 | ) | (1,075.5 | ) | ||||||
| Interest paid capitalized to property, plant and equipment | (19.8 | ) | (92.6 | ) | ||||||
| Proceeds from long-term investments and other assets | 189.8 | 4.8 | ||||||||
| Additions to long-term investments and other assets | (72.1 | ) | (43.2 | ) | ||||||
| Increase in restricted cash - net | (3.3 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||
| Interest received and other - net | 42.8 | 17.0 | ||||||||
| Net cash flow of continuing operations used in investing activities | (1,056.8 | ) | (1,189.9 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash flow of discontinued operations provided from investing activities | 53.4 | 10.0 | ||||||||
| Financing: | ||||||||||
| Repayment of debt | (700.0 | ) | (800.0 | ) | ||||||
| Interest paid | (65.2 | ) | (35.6 | ) | ||||||
| Payment of lease liabilities | (7.2 | ) | (12.1 | ) | ||||||
| Funding from non-controlling interest | - | 31.3 | ||||||||
| Distributions paid to non-controlling interest | (102.0 | ) | (40.5 | ) | ||||||
| Dividends paid to common shareholders | (152.1 | ) | (147.5 | ) | ||||||
| Repurchase and cancellation of shares | (600.3 | ) | - | |||||||
| Other - net | (1.2 | ) | (1.5 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash flow used in financing activities | (1,628.0 | ) | (1,005.9 | ) | ||||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 1.7 | (1.5 | ) | |||||||
| Increase in cash and cash equivalents | 1,130.8 | 259.1 | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 611.5 | 352.4 | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 1,742.3 | $ | 611.5 | ||||||
| Operating Summary | |||||||||||||||||||
| Mine | Period | Tonnes Ore Mined | Ore Processed (Milled) | Ore Processed (Heap Leach) | Grade (Mill) | Grade (Heap Leach) | Recovery (a)(b) | Gold Eq Production(c) | Gold Eq Sales(c) | Production cost of sales | Production cost of sales/oz(d) | Cap Ex - sustaining(e) | Total Cap Ex (e) | ||||||
| ('000 tonnes) | ('000 tonnes) | ('000 tonnes) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (%) | (ounces) | (ounces) | ($ millions) | ($/ounce) | ($ millions) | ($ millions) | ||||||||
| West Africa | Tasiast | Q4 2025 | 3,120 | 2,252 | - | 1.87 | - | 94 | % | 125,625 | 118,912 | $ | 119.2 | $ | 1,002 | $ | 28.6 | $ | 80.5 |
| Q3 2025 | 1,685 | 2,181 | - | 1.78 | - | 94 | % | 120,934 | 116,251 | $ | 103.4 | $ | 889 | $ | 47.6 | $ | 102.0 | ||
| Q2 2025 | 1,921 | 1,730 | - | 2.11 | - | 95 | % | 119,241 | 121,745 | $ | 102.6 | $ | 843 | $ | 23.1 | $ | 89.7 | ||
| Q1 2025 | 1,812 | 1,932 | - | 2.15 | - | 95 | % | 137,629 | 129,493 | $ | 105.0 | $ | 811 | $ | 13.7 | $ | 80.1 | ||
| Q4 2024 | 1,824 | 2,205 | - | 2.13 | - | 94 | % | 139,411 | 144,041 | $ | 104.4 | $ | 725 | $ | 33.7 | $ | 105.4 | ||
| Americas | Paracatu | Q4 2025 | 10,929 | 12,395 | - | 0.45 | - | 83 | % | 155,048 | 154,565 | $ | 165.0 | $ | 1,068 | $ | 67.6 | $ | 67.6 |
| Q3 2025 | 12,958 | 13,214 | - | 0.44 | - | 82 | % | 150,367 | 149,903 | $ | 139.9 | $ | 933 | $ | 58.2 | $ | 58.2 | ||
| Q2 2025 | 13,497 | 14,527 | - | 0.39 | - | 82 | % | 149,264 | 148,787 | $ | 142.6 | $ | 958 | $ | 38.4 | $ | 38.4 | ||
| Q1 2025 | 13,318 | 12,507 | - | 0.43 | - | 83 | % | 146,639 | 146,855 | $ | 139.6 | $ | 951 | $ | 24.4 | $ | 24.4 | ||
| Q4 2024 | 12,944 | 13,116 | - | 0.40 | - | 80 | % | 123,899 | 124,690 | $ | 131.6 | $ | 1,055 | $ | 35.1 | $ | 35.1 | ||
| La Coipa(f) | Q4 2025 | 1,219 | 1,203 | - | 2.42 | - | 74 | % | 67,319 | 71,419 | $ | 80.7 | $ | 1,130 | $ | 31.7 | $ | 31.7 | |
| Q3 2025 | 1,006 | 932 | - | 2.36 | - | 76 | % | 57,997 | 57,544 | $ | 69.0 | $ | 1,199 | $ | 18.5 | $ | 18.5 | ||
| Q2 2025 | 580 | 911 | - | 1.77 | - | 78 | % | 54,139 | 50,400 | $ | 70.4 | $ | 1,397 | $ | 25.0 | $ | 25.0 | ||
| Q1 2025 | 1,265 | 971 | - | 2.19 | - | 80 | % | 52,315 | 55,870 | $ | 64.1 | $ | 1,147 | $ | 15.6 | $ | 15.6 | ||
| Q4 2024 | 1,385 | 1,017 | - | 1.98 | - | 79 | % | 58,533 | 57,852 | $ | 68.2 | $ | 1,179 | $ | 26.6 | $ | 26.6 | ||
| Fort Knox ( | Q4 2025 | 11,056 | 1,645 | 8,805 | 1.02 | 0.23 | 88 | % | 71,523 | 74,294 | $ | 125.8 | $ | 1,693 | $ | 38.0 | $ | 38.0 | |
| Q3 2025 | 8,140 | 1,511 | 6,538 | 1.86 | 0.23 | 90 | % | 112,181 | 117,500 | $ | 159.7 | $ | 1,359 | $ | 45.0 | $ | 45.0 | ||
| Q2 2025 | 7,639 | 1,636 | 5,529 | 1.72 | 0.23 | 88 | % | 115,064 | 113,200 | $ | 141.3 | $ | 1,248 | $ | 43.0 | $ | 43.0 | ||
| Q1 2025 | 6,530 | 1,071 | 4,790 | 2.77 | 0.19 | 91 | % | 112,054 | 112,110 | $ | 131.8 | $ | 1,176 | $ | 28.2 | $ | 28.2 | ||
| Q4 2024 | 7,692 | 1,524 | 6,664 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 82 | % | 104,901 | 108,512 | $ | 141.0 | $ | 1,299 | $ | 53.3 | $ | 54.0 | ||
| Fort Knox (attributable)(g) | Q4 2025 | 11,001 | 1,597 | 8,805 | 0.93 | 0.23 | 87 | % | 65,434 | 67,882 | $ | 113.6 | $ | 1,673 | $ | 31.5 | $ | 31.5 | |
| Q3 2025 | 8,056 | 1,425 | 6,538 | 1.55 | 0.23 | 89 | % | 95,742 | 100,878 | $ | 138.4 | $ | 1,372 | $ | 40.4 | $ | 40.4 | ||
| Q2 2025 | 7,535 | 1,567 | 5,529 | 1.47 | 0.23 | 87 | % | 97,561 | 95,277 | $ | 118.8 | $ | 1,247 | $ | 38.7 | $ | 38.7 | ||
| Q1 2025 | 6,445 | 982 | 4,790 | 2.35 | 0.19 | 90 | % | 94,281 | 94,585 | $ | 111.1 | $ | 1,175 | $ | 24.6 | $ | 24.6 | ||
| Q4 2024 | 7,619 | 1,483 | 6,664 | 1.28 | 0.21 | 81 | % | 91,755 | 94,763 | $ | 125.1 | $ | 1,320 | $ | 51.1 | $ | 52.1 | ||
| Round Mountain | Q4 2025 | 737 | 966 | 1,110 | 0.49 | 0.29 | 67 | % | 31,754 | 31,641 | $ | 86.6 | $ | 2,737 | $ | 8.6 | $ | 41.5 | |
| Q3 2025 | 1,659 | 914 | 1,113 | 0.66 | 0.32 | 72 | % | 37,297 | 37,274 | $ | 78.1 | $ | 2,095 | $ | 4.5 | $ | 33.0 | ||
| Q2 2025 | 2,881 | 856 | 1,682 | 0.72 | 0.30 | 80 | % | 38,665 | 37,864 | $ | 52.1 | $ | 1,376 | $ | 5.7 | $ | 32.8 | ||
| Q1 2025 | 1,927 | 856 | 2,163 | 0.66 | 0.27 | 77 | % | 35,686 | 35,960 | $ | 57.0 | $ | 1,585 | $ | 2.8 | $ | 29.6 | ||
| Q4 2024 | 3,111 | 768 | 1,736 | 1.05 | 0.22 | 82 | % | 42,969 | 45,342 | $ | 80.0 | $ | 1,764 | $ | 4.4 | $ | 33.9 | ||
| Bald Mountain | Q4 2025 | 3,165 | - | 3,165 | - | 0.30 | nm | 38,402 | 37,141 | $ | 55.4 | $ | 1,492 | $ | 13.1 | $ | 51.6 | ||
| Q3 2025 | 2,182 | - | 2,182 | - | 0.31 | nm | 41,525 | 42,261 | $ | 48.5 | $ | 1,148 | $ | 5.3 | $ | 27.9 | |||
| Q2 2025 | 1,578 | - | 1,578 | - | 1.07 | nm | 53,704 | 54,227 | $ | 59.4 | $ | 1,095 | $ | 12.7 | $ | 40.4 | |||
| Q1 2025 | 5,803 | - | 5,803 | - | 0.35 | nm | 45,538 | 43,801 | $ | 49.2 | $ | 1,123 | $ | 6.9 | $ | 17.8 | |||
| Q4 2024 | 7,622 | - | 7,622 | - | 0.46 | nm | 44,642 | 51,291 | $ | 58.7 | $ | 1,144 | $ | 4.6 | $ | 6.4 | |||
| (a) | Due to the nature of heap leach operations, recovery rates at Bald Mountain cannot be accurately measured on a quarterly basis. Recovery rates at Fort Knox and Round Mountain represent mill recovery only. | |
| (b) | "nm" means not meaningful. | |
| (c) | Gold equivalent ounces include silver ounces produced and sold converted to a gold equivalent based on the ratio of the average spot market prices for the commodities for each period. The ratios for the quarters presented are as follows: Q4 2025: 76.34:1; Q3 2025: 87.73:1; Q2 2025: 97.41:1; Q1 2025: 89.69:1; Q4 2024: 84.67:1. | |
| (d) | “Production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold” is defined as production cost of sales divided by total gold equivalent ounces sold. | |
| (e) | "Total Cap Ex" is “Additions to property, plant and equipment” on the consolidated statements of cash flows. "Cap Ex - sustaining" is a non-GAAP financial measure. The definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure is included on page [•] of this news release. | |
| (f) | La Coipa silver grade and recovery were as follows: Q4 2025: 33.21 g/t, | |
| (g) | The Fort Knox segment is composed of Fort Knox and Manh Choh. Manh Choh tonnes of ore processed and grade were as follows: Q4 2025: 158,016 tonnes, 4.08 g/t; Q3 2025: 286,496 tonnes, 7.05 g/t; Q2 2025: 231,451 tonnes, 7.39 g/t; Q1 2025: 294,238 tonnes, 7.39 g/t; Q4 2024: 138,937 tonnes, 9.58 g/t. The attributable results for Fort Knox include | |
Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures and ratios
The Company has included certain non-GAAP financial measures and ratios in this document. These financial measures and ratios are not defined under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation. The Company believes that these financial measures and ratios, together with financial measures and ratios determined in accordance with IFRS, provide investors with an improved ability to evaluate the underlying performance of the Company. The inclusion of these financial measures and ratios is meant to provide additional information and should not be used as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with IFRS. These financial measures and ratios are not necessarily standard and therefore may not be comparable to other issuers.
Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Net Earnings per Share
Adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share are non-GAAP financial measures and ratios which determine the performance of the Company, excluding certain impacts which the Company believes are not reflective of the Company’s underlying performance for the reporting period, such as the impact of foreign exchange gains and losses, reassessment of prior year taxes and/or taxes otherwise not related to the current period, impairment charges (reversals), gains and losses and other one-time costs related to acquisitions, dispositions and other transactions, and non-hedge derivative gains and losses. Although some of the items are recurring, the Company believes that they are not reflective of the underlying operating performance of its current business and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Management believes that these measures and ratios, which are used internally to assess performance and in planning and forecasting future operating results, provide investors with the ability to better evaluate underlying performance, particularly since the excluded items are typically not included in public guidance. However, adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share measures and ratios are not necessarily indicative of net earnings and earnings per share measures and ratios as determined under IFRS.
The following table provides a reconciliation of net earnings to adjusted net earnings for the periods presented:
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts) | Three months ended | Years ended | ||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to common shareholders - as reported | $ | 906.5 | $ | 275.6 | $ | 2,390.1 | $ | 948.8 | ||||||
| Adjusting items: | ||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange (gains) losses | (7.1 | ) | (22.2 | ) | 21.5 | (27.3 | ) | |||||||
| Foreign exchange losses (gains) on translation of tax basis and foreign exchange on deferred income taxes within income tax expense | 0.2 | 54.4 | (36.4 | ) | 86.4 | |||||||||
| Taxes in respect of prior periods | (21.5 | ) | (37.8 | ) | (22.8 | ) | (60.7 | ) | ||||||
| Impairment reversal | (116.1 | ) | - | (116.1 | ) | (74.1 | ) | |||||||
| Loss on sale of assets | 11.5 | 3.5 | 16.5 | 6.0 | ||||||||||
| Gain on sale of Asante holdings(a) | - | - | (53.0 | ) | - | |||||||||
| Tasiast mill fire related costs | - | - | 13.0 | - | ||||||||||
| Insurance recoveries | - | - | - | (22.9 | ) | |||||||||
| Collective labour agreements | 55.6 | - | 55.6 | - | ||||||||||
| Settlement provisions | - | (5.6 | ) | - | 2.6 | |||||||||
| Reclamation expense (recovery) | (56.1 | ) | 6.9 | (56.1 | ) | 6.9 | ||||||||
| Other adjustments related to prior periods | - | (27.8 | ) | - | (27.8 | ) | ||||||||
| Other(b) | 7.7 | (10.4 | ) | 7.0 | (4.9 | ) | ||||||||
| Tax effects of the above adjustments | 28.6 | 3.4 | 24.6 | 5.3 | ||||||||||
| (97.2 | ) | (35.6 | ) | (146.2 | ) | (110.5 | ) | |||||||
| Adjusted net earnings | $ | 809.3 | $ | 240.0 | $ | 2,243.9 | $ | 838.3 | ||||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - Basic | 1,206.7 | 1,229.1 | 1,219.5 | 1,228.9 | ||||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings per share | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 1.84 | $ | 0.68 | ||||||
| Basic earnings per share attributable to common shareholders - as reported | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1.96 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||
| (a) | The gain on sale of Asante holdings includes interest income of |
| (b) | Other includes various impacts, such as one-time costs and credits at sites, restructuring costs, and gains and losses on hedges, which the Company believes are not reflective of the Company’s underlying performance for the reporting period. |
Attributable Free Cash Flow
Attributable free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure and is defined as net cash flow provided from operating activities less attributable capital expenditures and non-controlling interest included in net cash flows provided from operating activities. The Company believes that this measure, which is used internally to evaluate the Company’s underlying cash generation performance and the ability to repay creditors and return cash to shareholders, provides investors with the ability to better evaluate the Company’s underlying performance. However, this measure is not necessarily indicative of operating earnings or net cash flow provided from operating activities as determined under IFRS.
The following table provides a reconciliation of attributable free cash flow for the periods presented:
| Three months ended | Years ended | ||||||||||||
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars) | December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||
| Net cash flow provided from operating activities - as reported | $ | 1,146.9 | $ | 734.5 | $ | 3,760.5 | $ | 2,446.4 | |||||
| Adjusting items: | |||||||||||||
| Attributable(a)capital expenditures | (361.7 | ) | (278.8 | ) | (1,175.2 | ) | (1,050.9 | ) | |||||
| Non-controlling interest(b)cash flow from operating activities | (15.8 | ) | (21.3 | ) | (111.8 | ) | (55.3 | ) | |||||
| Attributable(a)free cash flow | $ | 769.4 | $ | 434.4 | $ | 2,473.5 | $ | 1,340.2 | |||||
See pages 33 and 34 for details of the footnotes referenced within the table above.
Attributable Adjusted Operating Cash Flow
Attributable adjusted operating cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure and is defined as net cash flow provided from operating activities excluding changes in working capital, certain impacts which the Company believes are not reflective of the Company’s regular operating cash flow, and net cash flows provided from operating activities, net of working capital changes, relating to non-controlling interests. Working capital is excluded given that numerous factors can result in it being volatile. The Company uses attributable adjusted operating cash flow internally as a measure of the underlying operating cash flow performance and future operating cash flow-generating capability of the Company. However, the attributable adjusted operating cash flow measure is not necessarily indicative of net cash flow provided from operating activities as determined under IFRS.
The following table provides a reconciliation of attributable adjusted operating cash flow for the periods presented:
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars) | Three months ended | Years ended | ||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024(m) | 2025 | 2024(m) | |||||||||||
| Net cash flow provided from operating activities - as reported | $ | 1,146.9 | $ | 734.5 | $ | 3,760.5 | $ | 2,446.4 | ||||||
| Adjusting items: | ||||||||||||||
| Insurance proceeds received in respect of prior years | - | - | - | (22.9 | ) | |||||||||
| Working capital changes: | ||||||||||||||
| Accounts receivable and other assets | (18.2 | ) | (30.9 | ) | (9.5 | ) | (27.5 | ) | ||||||
| Inventories | 34.5 | (17.4 | ) | 83.9 | (14.3 | ) | ||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (13.8 | ) | 10.9 | (114.1 | ) | (26.0 | ) | |||||||
| 1,149.4 | 697.1 | 3,720.8 | 2,355.7 | |||||||||||
| Non-controlling interest(b)cash flow from operating activities, net of working capital changes | (13.4 | ) | (20.1 | ) | (115.6 | ) | (61.8 | ) | ||||||
| Attributable(a)adjusted operating cash flow | $ | 1,136.0 | $ | 677.0 | $ | 3,605.2 | $ | 2,293.9 | ||||||
See pages 33 and 34 for details of the footnotes referenced within the table above.
Attributable Average Realized Gold Price per Ounce
Attributable average realized gold price per ounce is a non-GAAP ratio which calculates the average price realized from gold sales attributable to the Company. The Company believes that this measure provides a more accurate measure with which to compare the Company's gold sales performance to market gold prices. The following table provides a reconciliation of attributable average realized gold price per ounce for the periods presented:
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except ounces and average realized gold price per ounce) | Three months ended | Years ended | ||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| Metal sales - as reported | $ | 2,023.0 | $ | 1,415.8 | $ | 7,051.1 | $ | 5,148.8 | ||||||
| Less: silver revenue(c) | (36.8 | ) | (24.6 | ) | (114.2 | ) | (121.9 | ) | ||||||
| Less: non-controlling interest(b)gold revenue | (25.5 | ) | (35.5 | ) | (191.4 | ) | (103.0 | ) | ||||||
| Attributable(a)gold revenue | $ | 1,960.7 | $ | 1,355.7 | $ | 6,745.5 | $ | 4,923.9 | ||||||
| Gold ounces sold | 479,347 | 522,389 | 2,026,570 | 2,100,621 | ||||||||||
| Less: non-controlling interest(b)gold ounces sold | (6,254 | ) | (13,649 | ) | (57,829 | ) | (41,325 | ) | ||||||
| Attributable(a)gold ounces sold | 473,093 | 508,740 | 1,968,741 | 2,059,296 | ||||||||||
| Attributable(a)average realized gold price per ounce | $ | 4,144 | $ | 2,665 | $ | 3,426 | $ | 2,391 | ||||||
| Average realized gold price per ounce(d) | $ | 4,144 | $ | 2,663 | $ | 3,423 | $ | 2,393 | ||||||
See pages 33 and 34 for details of the footnotes referenced within the table above.
Attributable Production Cost of Sales per Equivalent Ounce Sold
Production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold is defined as production cost of sales, as reported on the consolidated statement of operations, divided by the total number of gold equivalent ounces sold. This measure converts the Company’s non-gold production into gold equivalent ounces and credits it to total production.
Attributable production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold is a non-GAAP ratio and is defined as attributable production cost of sales divided by the attributable number of gold equivalent ounces sold. This measure converts the Company’s attributable non-gold production into gold equivalent ounces and credits it to total attributable production. Management uses this measure to monitor and evaluate the performance of its operating properties that are attributable to its shareholders.
The following table provides a reconciliation of production cost of sales and attributable production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold for the periods presented:
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except ounces and production cost of sales per equivalent ounce) | Three months ended | Years ended | ||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| Production cost of sales - as reported | $ | 632.7 | $ | 583.8 | $ | 2,346.4 | $ | 2,197.1 | ||||||
| Less: non-controlling interest(b)production cost of sales | (12.2 | ) | (15.9 | ) | (76.7 | ) | (40.8 | ) | ||||||
| Attributable(a)production cost of sales | $ | 620.5 | $ | 567.9 | $ | 2,269.7 | $ | 2,156.3 | ||||||
| Gold equivalent ounces sold | 487,972 | 531,729 | 2,059,017 | 2,153,212 | ||||||||||
| Less: non-controlling interest(b)gold equivalent ounces sold | (6,412 | ) | (13,749 | ) | (58,482 | ) | (41,524 | ) | ||||||
| Attributable(a)gold equivalent ounces sold | 481,560 | 517,980 | 2,000,535 | 2,111,688 | ||||||||||
| Attributable(a)production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold | $ | 1,289 | $ | 1,096 | $ | 1,135 | $ | 1,021 | ||||||
| Production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold(e) | $ | 1,297 | $ | 1,098 | $ | 1,140 | $ | 1,020 | ||||||
See pages 33 and 34 for details of the footnotes referenced within the table above.
Attributable Production Cost of Sales per Ounce Sold on a By-Product Basis
Attributable production cost of sales per ounce sold on a by-product basis is a non-GAAP ratio which calculates the impact of the Company’s non-gold production as a credit against its per ounce production costs, rather than converting its non-gold production into gold equivalent ounces and crediting it to total production, as is the case in co-product accounting. Management believes that this ratio provides investors with the ability to better evaluate Kinross’ production cost of sales per ounce on a comparable basis with other major gold producers who routinely calculate their cost of sales per ounce using by-product accounting rather than co-product accounting.
The following table provides a reconciliation of attributable production cost of sales per ounce sold on a by-product basis for the periods presented:
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except ounces and production cost of sales per ounce) | Three months ended | Years ended | ||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| Production cost of sales - as reported | $ | 632.7 | $ | 583.8 | $ | 2,346.4 | $ | 2,197.1 | ||||||
| Less: non-controlling interest(b)production cost of sales | (12.2 | ) | (15.9 | ) | (76.7 | ) | (40.8 | ) | ||||||
| Less: attributable(a)impact of silver by-product(n) | (36.1 | ) | (24.2 | ) | (111.9 | ) | (121.4 | ) | ||||||
| Attributable(a)production cost of sales on a by-product basis | $ | 584.4 | $ | 543.7 | $ | 2,157.8 | $ | 2,034.9 | ||||||
| Gold ounces sold | 479,347 | 522,389 | 2,026,570 | 2,100,621 | ||||||||||
| Less: non-controlling interest(b)gold ounces sold | (6,254 | ) | (13,649 | ) | (57,829 | ) | (41,325 | ) | ||||||
| Attributable(a)gold ounces sold | 473,093 | 508,740 | 1,968,741 | 2,059,296 | ||||||||||
| Attributable(a)production cost of sales per ounce sold on a by-product basis | $ | 1,235 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 1,096 | $ | 988 | ||||||
| Production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold(e) | $ | 1,297 | $ | 1,098 | $ | 1,140 | $ | 1,020 | ||||||
See pages 33 and 34 for details of the footnotes referenced within the table above.
Attributable All-In Sustaining Cost and All-In Cost per Ounce Sold on a By-Product Basis
Attributable all-in sustaining cost and all-in cost per ounce sold on a by-product basis are non-GAAP financial measures and ratios, as applicable, calculated based on guidance published by the World Gold Council (“WGC”). The WGC is a market development organization for the gold industry and is an association whose membership comprises leading gold mining companies including Kinross. Although the WGC is not a mining industry regulatory organization, it worked closely with its member companies to develop these metrics. Adoption of the all-in sustaining cost and all-in cost metrics is voluntary and not necessarily standard, and therefore, these measures and ratios presented by the Company may not be comparable to similar measures and ratios presented by other issuers. The Company believes that the all-in sustaining cost and all-in cost measures complement existing measures and ratios reported by Kinross.
All-in sustaining cost includes both operating and capital costs required to sustain gold production on an ongoing basis. The impact of silver sold is deducted from the total production cost of sales as it is considered residual production, i.e. a by-product. Sustaining operating costs represent expenditures incurred at current operations that are considered necessary to maintain current production. Sustaining capital represents capital expenditures at existing operations comprising mine development costs, including capitalized development, and ongoing replacement of mine equipment and other capital facilities, and does not include capital expenditures for major growth projects or enhancement capital for significant infrastructure improvements at existing operations.
All-in cost is comprised of all-in sustaining cost as well as operating expenditures incurred at locations with no current operation, or costs related to other non-sustaining activities, and capital expenditures for major growth projects or enhancement capital for significant infrastructure improvements at existing operations.
Attributable all-in sustaining cost and all-in cost per ounce sold on a by-product basis are calculated by adjusting production cost of sales, as reported on the consolidated statements of operations, as follows:
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except ounces and costs per ounce) | Three months ended | Years ended | ||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| Production cost of sales - as reported | $ | 632.7 | $ | 583.8 | $ | 2,346.4 | $ | 2,197.1 | ||||||
| Less: non-controlling interest(b)production cost of sales | (12.2 | ) | (15.9 | ) | (76.7 | ) | (40.8 | ) | ||||||
| Less: attributable(a)impact of silver by-product(n) | (36.1 | ) | (24.2 | ) | (111.9 | ) | (121.4 | ) | ||||||
| Attributable(a)production cost of sales on a by-product basis | $ | 584.4 | $ | 543.7 | $ | 2,157.8 | $ | 2,034.9 | ||||||
| Adjusting items on an attributable(a)basis: | ||||||||||||||
| General and administrative(f) | 37.9 | 31.9 | 134.4 | 122.2 | ||||||||||
| Other operating (income) expense - sustaining(g) | (1.7 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 4.0 | |||||||
| Reclamation and remediation - sustaining(h) | 20.7 | 15.3 | 87.1 | 71.4 | ||||||||||
| Exploration and business development - sustaining(i) | 18.3 | 10.1 | 56.8 | 42.5 | ||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment - sustaining(j) | 181.2 | 155.9 | 587.8 | 523.5 | ||||||||||
| Lease payments - sustaining(k) | 1.9 | 1.9 | 6.3 | 11.8 | ||||||||||
| All-in Sustaining Cost on a by-product basis - attributable(a) | $ | 842.7 | $ | 757.9 | $ | 3,030.0 | $ | 2,810.3 | ||||||
| Adjusting items on an attributable(a)basis: | ||||||||||||||
| Other operating expense - non-sustaining(g) | 35.5 | 20.3 | 95.0 | 53.1 | ||||||||||
| Reclamation and remediation - non-sustaining(h) | 2.3 | 1.7 | 9.2 | 6.8 | ||||||||||
| Exploration and business development - non-sustaining(i) | 30.8 | 40.4 | 144.6 | 153.4 | ||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment - non-sustaining(j) | 180.5 | 122.9 | 587.4 | 527.4 | ||||||||||
| Lease payments - non-sustaining(k) | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.3 | ||||||||||
| All-in Cost on a by-product basis - attributable(a) | $ | 1,092.1 | $ | 943.3 | $ | 3,867.1 | $ | 3,551.3 | ||||||
| Gold ounces sold | 479,347 | 522,389 | 2,026,570 | 2,100,621 | ||||||||||
| Less: non-controlling interest(b)gold ounces sold | (6,254 | ) | (13,649 | ) | (57,829 | ) | (41,325 | ) | ||||||
| Attributable(a)gold ounces sold | 473,093 | 508,740 | 1,968,741 | 2,059,296 | ||||||||||
| Attributable(a)all-in sustaining cost per ounce sold on a by-product basis | $ | 1,781 | $ | 1,490 | $ | 1,539 | $ | 1,365 | ||||||
| Attributable(a)all-in cost per ounce sold on a by-product basis | $ | 2,308 | $ | 1,854 | $ | 1,964 | $ | 1,725 | ||||||
| Production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold(e) | $ | 1,297 | $ | 1,098 | $ | 1,140 | $ | 1,020 | ||||||
See pages 33 and 34 for details of the footnotes referenced within the table above.
Attributable All-In Sustaining Cost and All-In Cost per Equivalent Ounce Sold
The Company also assesses its attributable all-in sustaining cost and all-in cost on a gold equivalent ounce basis. Under these non-GAAP financial measures and ratios, the Company’s production of silver is converted into gold equivalent ounces and credited to total production.
Attributable all-in sustaining cost and all-in cost per equivalent ounce sold are calculated by adjusting production cost of sales, as reported on the consolidated statements of operations, as follows:
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except ounces and costs per ounce) | Three months ended | Years ended | ||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| Production cost of sales - as reported | $ | 632.7 | $ | 583.8 | $ | 2,346.4 | $ | 2,197.1 | ||||||
| Less: non-controlling interest(b)production cost of sales | (12.2 | ) | (15.9 | ) | (76.7 | ) | (40.8 | ) | ||||||
| Attributable(a)production cost of sales | $ | 620.5 | $ | 567.9 | $ | 2,269.7 | $ | 2,156.3 | ||||||
| Adjusting items on an attributable(a)basis: | ||||||||||||||
| General and administrative(f) | 37.9 | 31.9 | 134.4 | 122.2 | ||||||||||
| Other operating (income) expense - sustaining(g) | (1.7 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 4.0 | |||||||
| Reclamation and remediation - sustaining(h) | 20.7 | 15.3 | 87.1 | 71.4 | ||||||||||
| Exploration and business development - sustaining(i) | 18.3 | 10.1 | 56.8 | 42.5 | ||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment - sustaining(j) | 181.2 | 155.9 | 587.8 | 523.5 | ||||||||||
| Lease payments - sustaining(k) | 1.9 | 1.9 | 6.3 | 11.8 | ||||||||||
| All-in Sustaining Cost - attributable(a) | $ | 878.8 | $ | 782.1 | $ | 3,141.9 | $ | 2,931.7 | ||||||
| Adjusting items on an attributable(a)basis: | ||||||||||||||
| Other operating expense - non-sustaining(g) | 35.5 | 20.3 | 95.0 | 53.1 | ||||||||||
| Reclamation and remediation - non-sustaining(h) | 2.3 | 1.7 | 9.2 | 6.8 | ||||||||||
| Exploration and business development - non-sustaining(i) | 30.8 | 40.4 | 144.6 | 153.4 | ||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment - non-sustaining(j) | 180.5 | 122.9 | 587.4 | 527.4 | ||||||||||
| Lease payments - non-sustaining(k) | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.3 | ||||||||||
| All-in Cost - attributable(a) | $ | 1,128.2 | $ | 967.5 | $ | 3,979.0 | $ | 3,672.7 | ||||||
| Gold equivalent ounces sold | 487,972 | 531,729 | 2,059,017 | 2,153,212 | ||||||||||
| Less: non-controlling interest(b)gold equivalent ounces sold | (6,412 | ) | (13,749 | ) | (58,482 | ) | (41,524 | ) | ||||||
| Attributable(a)gold equivalent ounces sold | 481,560 | 517,980 | 2,000,535 | 2,111,688 | ||||||||||
| Attributable(a)all-in sustaining cost per equivalent ounce sold | $ | 1,825 | $ | 1,510 | $ | 1,571 | $ | 1,388 | ||||||
| Attributable(a)all-in cost per equivalent ounce sold | $ | 2,343 | $ | 1,868 | $ | 1,989 | $ | 1,739 | ||||||
| Production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold(e) | $ | 1,297 | $ | 1,098 | $ | 1,140 | $ | 1,020 | ||||||
See pages 33 and 34 for details of the footnotes referenced within the table above.
Capital Expenditures and Attributable Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures are classified as either sustaining capital expenditures or non-sustaining capital expenditures, depending on the nature of the expenditure. Sustaining capital expenditures typically represent capital expenditures at existing operations including capitalized exploration costs and capitalized development unless related to major projects, ongoing replacement of mine equipment and other capital facilities and other capital expenditures and is calculated as total additions to property, plant and equipment (as reported on the consolidated statements of cash flows), less non-sustaining capital expenditures. Non-sustaining capital expenditures represent capital expenditures for major projects, including major capital development projects at existing operations that are expected to materially benefit the operation, as well as enhancement capital for significant infrastructure improvements at existing operations. Management believes the distinction between sustaining capital expenditures and non-sustaining expenditures is a useful indicator of the purpose of capital expenditures and this distinction is an input into the calculation of attributable all-in sustaining costs per ounce and attributable all-in costs per ounce. The categorization of sustaining capital expenditures and non-sustaining capital expenditures is consistent with the definitions under the WGC all-in cost standard. Sustaining capital expenditures and non-sustaining capital expenditures are not defined under IFRS, however, the sum of these two measures total to additions to property, plant and equipment as disclosed under IFRS on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Additions to property, plant and equipment per the consolidated statements of cash flows includes
The following table provides a reconciliation of the classification of capital expenditures for the periods presented:
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended December 31, 2025 | Tasiast (Mauritania) | Paracatu (Brazil) | La Coipa (Chile) | Fort Knox(l) (USA) | Round Mountain (USA) | Bald Mountain (USA) | Total USA | Other | Total | |||||||||||||
| Sustaining capital expenditures | $ | 28.6 | $ | 67.6 | $ | 31.7 | $ | 38.0 | $ | 8.6 | $ | 13.1 | $ | 59.7 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 187.8 | ||||
| Non-sustaining capital expenditures | 51.9 | - | - | - | 32.9 | 38.5 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 180.4 | |||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment - per cash flow | $ | 80.5 | $ | 67.6 | $ | 31.7 | $ | 38.0 | $ | 41.5 | $ | 51.6 | $ | 131.1 | $ | 57.3 | $ | 368.2 | ||||
| Less: Non-controlling interest(b) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (6.5 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (6.5 | ) | $ | - | $ | (6.5 | ) | |
| Attributable(a) capital expenditures | $ | 80.5 | $ | 67.6 | $ | 31.7 | $ | 31.5 | $ | 41.5 | $ | 51.6 | $ | 124.6 | $ | 57.3 | $ | 361.7 | ||||
| Three months ended December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sustaining capital expenditures | $ | 33.7 | $ | 35.1 | $ | 26.6 | $ | 53.3 | $ | 4.4 | $ | 4.6 | $ | 62.3 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 158.0 | ||||
| Non-sustaining capital expenditures | 71.7 | - | - | 0.7 | 29.5 | 1.8 | 32.0 | 19.0 | 122.7 | |||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment - per cash flow | $ | 105.4 | $ | 35.1 | $ | 26.6 | $ | 54.0 | $ | 33.9 | $ | 6.4 | $ | 94.3 | $ | 19.3 | $ | 280.7 | ||||
| Less: Non-controlling interest(b) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (1.9 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (1.9 | ) | $ | - | $ | (1.9 | ) | |
| Attributable(a) capital expenditures | $ | 105.4 | $ | 35.1 | $ | 26.6 | $ | 52.1 | $ | 33.9 | $ | 6.4 | $ | 92.4 | $ | 19.3 | $ | 278.8 | ||||
| (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Years ended December 31, 2025 | Tasiast (Mauritania) | Paracatu (Brazil) | La Coipa (Chile) | Fort Knox(l) (USA) | Round Mountain (USA) | Bald Mountain (USA) | Total USA | Other | Total | |||||||||||||
| Sustaining capital expenditures | $ | 113.0 | $ | 188.6 | $ | 90.8 | $ | 154.2 | $ | 21.6 | $ | 38.0 | $ | 213.8 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 606.8 | ||||
| Non-sustaining capital expenditures | 239.3 | - | - | - | 115.3 | 99.7 | 215.0 | 133.1 | 587.4 | |||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment - per cash flow | $ | 352.3 | $ | 188.6 | $ | 90.8 | $ | 154.2 | $ | 136.9 | $ | 137.7 | $ | 428.8 | $ | 133.7 | $ | 1,194.2 | ||||
| Less: Non-controlling interest(b) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (19.0 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (19.0 | ) | $ | - | $ | (19.0 | ) | |
| Attributable(a) capital expenditures | $ | 352.3 | $ | 188.6 | $ | 90.8 | $ | 135.2 | $ | 136.9 | $ | 137.7 | $ | 409.8 | $ | 133.7 | $ | 1,175.2 | ||||
| Years ended December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sustaining capital expenditures | $ | 64.3 | $ | 140.5 | $ | 65.8 | $ | 195.2 | $ | 15.4 | $ | 46.4 | $ | 257.0 | $ | (0.7 | ) | $ | 526.9 | |||
| Non-sustaining capital expenditures | 279.6 | - | 3.6 | 97.0 | 110.9 | 3.1 | 211.0 | 54.4 | 548.6 | |||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment - per cash flow | $ | 343.9 | $ | 140.5 | $ | 69.4 | $ | 292.2 | $ | 126.3 | $ | 49.5 | $ | 468.0 | $ | 53.7 | $ | 1,075.5 | ||||
| Less: Non-controlling interest(b) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (24.6 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (24.6 | ) | $ | - | $ | (24.6 | ) | |
| Attributable(a) capital expenditures | $ | 343.9 | $ | 140.5 | $ | 69.4 | $ | 267.6 | $ | 126.3 | $ | 49.5 | $ | 443.4 | $ | 53.7 | $ | 1,050.9 | ||||
See pages 33 and 34 for details of the footnotes referenced within the tables above.
Endnotes
| (a) | “Attributable” measures and ratios include Kinross’ share of Manh Choh ( |
| (b) | “Non-controlling interest” represents the non-controlling interest portion in Manh Choh ( |
| (c) | “Silver revenue” represents the portion of metal sales realized from the production of secondary or by-product metal (i.e. silver), which is produced as a by-product of the process used to produce gold. |
| (d) | “Average realized gold price per ounce” is defined as gold revenue divided by total gold ounces sold. |
| (e) | “Production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold” is defined as production cost of sales divided by total gold equivalent ounces sold. |
| (f) | “General and administrative” expenses are as reported on the consolidated statements of operations, excluding certain impacts which the Company believes are not reflective of the Company’s underlying performance for the reporting period. General and administrative expenses are considered sustaining costs as they are required to be absorbed on a continuing basis for the effective operation and governance of the Company. |
| (g) | “Other operating (income) expense – sustaining” is calculated as “Other operating expense” as reported on the consolidated statements of operations, less the non-controlling interest portion in Manh Choh ( |
| (h) | “Reclamation and remediation – sustaining” is calculated as current period accretion related to reclamation and remediation obligations plus current period amortization of the corresponding reclamation and remediation assets, less the non-controlling interest portion in Manh Choh ( |
| (i) | “Exploration and business development – sustaining” is calculated as “Exploration and business development” expenses as reported on the consolidated statements of operations, less the non-controlling interest portion in Manh Choh ( |
| (j) | “Additions to property, plant and equipment – sustaining” and “non-sustaining” are as presented on pages 32 and 33 of this news release and include Kinross’ share of Manh Choh’s ( |
| (k) | “Lease payments – sustaining” represents the majority of lease payments as reported on the consolidated statements of cash flows and is made up of the principal and financing components of such cash payments, less the non-controlling interest portion in Manh Choh ( |
| (l) | The Fort Knox segment is composed of Fort Knox and Manh Choh for all periods presented. |
| (m) | Attributable adjusted operating cash flow for the three months and year ended December 31, 2024 have been presented in accordance with the current year’s presentation. |
| (n) | “Impact of silver by-product” represents the costs allocated to the production of secondary or by-product metal (i.e. silver), which is produced as a by-product of the process used to produce gold. |
2025 Annual Mineral Reserve and Resource Statement
| Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves | ||||||||||||
| MINERAL RESERVE AND MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT | GOLD | |||||||||||
| PROVEN AND PROBABLE MINERAL RESERVES (1,2,3,4,5,6) | ||||||||||||
| Kinross Gold Corporation's Share at December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Kinross | Proven | Probable | Proven and Probable | |||||||||
| Location | Interest | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | ||
| (%) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | |||
| NORTH AMERICA | ||||||||||||
| Bald Mountain | USA | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 66,306 | 0.6 | 1,225 | 66,306 | 0.6 | 1,225 | ||
| Fort Knox | USA | 1,846 | 0.8 | 46 | 81,094 | 0.4 | 930 | 82,940 | 0.4 | 976 | ||
| Manh Choh | USA | 368 | 4.0 | 47 | 1,665 | 7.4 | 396 | 2,033 | 6.8 | 444 | ||
| Round Mountain | 7 | USA | 5,365 | 0.3 | 59 | 39,690 | 1.4 | 1,829 | 45,055 | 1.3 | 1,888 | |
| SUBTOTAL | 7,579 | 0.6 | 153 | 188,754 | 0.7 | 4,380 | 196,334 | 0.7 | 4,533 | |||
| SOUTH AMERICA | ||||||||||||
| La Coipa | 8 | Chile | 591 | 2.5 | 47 | 6,750 | 1.8 | 388 | 7,342 | 1.8 | 436 | |
| Lobo Marte | Chile | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 160,702 | 1.3 | 6,733 | 160,702 | 1.3 | 6,733 | ||
| Paracatu | Brazil | 287,864 | 0.4 | 3,897 | 111,778 | 0.3 | 943 | 399,642 | 0.4 | 4,839 | ||
| SUBTOTAL | 288,455 | 0.4 | 3,944 | 279,231 | 0.9 | 8,065 | 567,686 | 0.7 | 12,008 | |||
| AFRICA | ||||||||||||
| Tasiast | Mauritania | 55,584 | 1.0 | 1,806 | 47,181 | 1.7 | 2,595 | 102,765 | 1.3 | 4,401 | ||
| SUBTOTAL | 55,584 | 1.0 | 1,806 | 47,181 | 1.7 | 2,595 | 102,765 | 1.3 | 4,401 | |||
| TOTAL GOLD | 351,618 | 0.5 | 5,903 | 515,166 | 0.9 | 15,040 | 866,785 | 0.8 | 20,942 | |||
| MINERAL RESERVE AND MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT | SILVER | |||||||||||
| PROVEN AND PROBABLE MINERAL RESERVES (1,2,3,4,5,6) | ||||||||||||
| Kinross Gold Corporation's Share at December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Location | Kinross | Proven | Probable | Proven and Probable | ||||||||
| Interest | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | |||
| (%) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | |||
| NORTH AMERICA | ||||||||||||
| Manh Choh | USA | 368 | 11.8 | 139 | 1,665 | 11.3 | 604 | 2,033 | 11.4 | 743 | ||
| SUBTOTAL | 368 | 11.8 | 139 | 1,665 | 11.3 | 604 | 2,033 | 11.4 | 743 | |||
| SOUTH AMERICA | ||||||||||||
| La Coipa | 8 | Chile | 591 | 37.6 | 714 | 6,750 | 46.7 | 10,124 | 7,342 | 45.9 | 10,839 | |
| SUBTOTAL | 591 | 37.6 | 714 | 6,750 | 46.7 | 10,124 | 7,342 | 45.9 | 10,839 | |||
| TOTAL SILVER | 959 | 27.7 | 853 | 8,415 | 39.7 | 10,728 | 9,374 | 38.4 | 11,581 | |||
| See pages 38 and 39 of this news release for details of the footnotes referenced within the table above. | ||||||||||||
| Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources | ||||||||||||
| MINERAL RESERVE AND MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT | GOLD | |||||||||||
| MEASURED AND INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCES (2,3,4,5,6,9,10,11) | ||||||||||||
| Kinross Gold Corporation's Share at December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Kinross | Measured | Indicated | Measured and Indicated | |||||||||
| Location | Interest | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | ||
| (%) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | |||
| NORTH AMERICA | ||||||||||||
| Bald Mountain | USA | 5,678 | 1.0 | 188 | 139,266 | 0.5 | 2,360 | 144,944 | 0.5 | 2,548 | ||
| Fort Knox | USA | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 233,082 | 0.3 | 2,400 | 233,082 | 0.3 | 2,400 | ||
| Great Bear | CAN | 2,578 | 2.3 | 189 | 28,155 | 2.8 | 2,523 | 30,733 | 2.7 | 2,713 | ||
| Curlew Basin | 12 | USA | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1,993 | 6.4 | 409 | 1,993 | 6.4 | 409 | |
| Manh Choh | USA | 435 | 2.0 | 27 | 268 | 2.1 | 18 | 703 | 2.0 | 46 | ||
| Round Mountain | 7 | USA | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 81,275 | 0.6 | 1,446 | 81,275 | 0.6 | 1,446 | |
| SUBTOTAL | 8,691 | 1.4 | 405 | 484,039 | 0.6 | 9,156 | 492,730 | 0.6 | 9,561 | |||
| SOUTH AMERICA | ||||||||||||
| La Coipa | 8 | Chile | 6,440 | 1.7 | 356 | 39,561 | 1.4 | 1,772 | 46,001 | 1.4 | 2,128 | |
| Lobo Marte | Chile | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 120,762 | 0.7 | 2,752 | 120,762 | 0.7 | 2,752 | ||
| Maricunga | Chile | 71,946 | 0.7 | 1,602 | 278,454 | 0.6 | 5,538 | 350,400 | 0.6 | 7,140 | ||
| Paracatu | Brazil | 145,708 | 0.5 | 2,123 | 183,489 | 0.2 | 1,399 | 329,197 | 0.3 | 3,522 | ||
| SUBTOTAL | 224,093 | 0.6 | 4,081 | 622,266 | 0.6 | 11,460 | 846,360 | 0.6 | 15,542 | |||
| AFRICA | ||||||||||||
| Tasiast | Mauritania | 21,277 | 0.7 | 446 | 57,790 | 1.0 | 1,950 | 79,067 | 0.9 | 2,396 | ||
| SUBTOTAL | 21,277 | 0.7 | 446 | 57,790 | 1.0 | 1,950 | 79,067 | 0.9 | 2,396 | |||
| TOTAL GOLD | 254,062 | 0.6 | 4,932 | 1,164,095 | 0.6 | 22,567 | 1,418,157 | 0.6 | 27,499 | |||
| MINERAL RESERVE AND MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT | SILVER | |||||||||||
| MEASURED AND INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCES (2,3,4,5,6,9,10,11) | ||||||||||||
| Kinross Gold Corporation's Share at December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Location | Kinross | Measured | Indicated | Measured and Indicated | ||||||||
| Interest | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | |||
| (%) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | |||
| NORTH AMERICA | ||||||||||||
| Manh Choh | USA | 435 | 11.9 | 166 | 268 | 6.6 | 57 | 703 | 9.8 | 222 | ||
| SUBTOTAL | 435 | 11.9 | 166 | 268 | 6.6 | 57 | 703 | 9.8 | 222 | |||
| SOUTH AMERICA | ||||||||||||
| La Coipa | 8 | Chile | 6,440 | 28.5 | 5,909 | 39,561 | 36.3 | 46,234 | 46,001 | 35.3 | 52,143 | |
| SUBTOTAL | 6,440 | 28.5 | 5,909 | 39,561 | 36.3 | 46,234 | 46,001 | 35.3 | 52,143 | |||
| TOTAL SILVER | 6,875 | 27.5 | 6,075 | 39,829 | 36.1 | 46,291 | 46,704 | 34.9 | 52,365 | |||
| See pages 38 and 39 of this news release for details of the footnotes referenced within the table above. | ||||||||||||
Inferred Mineral Resources
| MINERAL RESERVE AND MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT | GOLD | |||||
| INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES | (2,3,4,5,6,9,10,11) | |||||
| Kinross Gold Corporation's Share at December 31, 2025 | ||||||
| Kinross | Inferred | |||||
| Location | Interest | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | ||
| (%) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | |||
| NORTH AMERICA | ||||||
| Bald Mountain | USA | 78,862 | 0.3 | 790 | ||
| Fort Knox | USA | 47,909 | 0.4 | 599 | ||
| Great Bear | CAN | 32,396 | 4.1 | 4,291 | ||
| Curlew Basin | 12 | USA | 4,151 | 6.3 | 838 | |
| Round Mountain | 7 | USA | 61,269 | 1.0 | 1,960 | |
| SUBTOTAL | 224,586 | 1.2 | 8,478 | |||
| SOUTH AMERICA | ||||||
| La Coipa | 8 | Chile | 4,799 | 1.2 | 188 | |
| Lobo Marte | Chile | 32,911 | 0.6 | 670 | ||
| Maricunga | Chile | 284,711 | 0.5 | 4,876 | ||
| Paracatu | Brazil | 6,383 | 0.2 | 44 | ||
| SUBTOTAL | 328,805 | 0.5 | 5,778 | |||
| AFRICA | ||||||
| Tasiast | Mauritania | 35,950 | 2.1 | 2,377 | ||
| SUBTOTAL | 35,950 | 2.1 | 2,377 | |||
| TOTAL GOLD | 589,341 | 0.9 | 16,633 | |||
| MINERAL RESERVE AND MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT | SILVER | |||||
| INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES | (2,3,4,5,6,9,10,11) | |||||
| Kinross Gold Corporation's Share at December 31, 2025 | ||||||
| Kinross | Inferred | |||||
| Location | Interest | Tonnes | Grade | Ounces | ||
| (%) | (kt) | (g/t) | (koz) | |||
| NORTH AMERICA | ||||||
| Round Mountain | 7 | USA | 36,648 | 6.9 | 8,117 | |
| SUBTOTAL | 36,648 | 6.9 | 8,117 | |||
| SOUTH AMERICA | ||||||
| La Coipa | 8 | Chile | 4,799 | 41.2 | 6,358 | |
| SUBTOTAL | 4,799 | 41.2 | 6,358 | |||
| TOTAL SILVER | 41,448 | 10.9 | 14,475 | |||
Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Statement Notes
(1) Unless otherwise noted, the Company's mineral reserves are estimated using appropriate cut-off grades based on an assumed gold price of
Canadian Dollar to $US 1.38
Chilean Peso to $US 940.00
Brazilian Real to $US 5.25
Mauritanian Ouguiya to $US 40.00
(2) The Company’s mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates as at December 31, 2025 are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) “CIM Definition Standards For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” adopted by the CIM Council (as amended, the “CIM Definition Standards”) in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” (“NI 43-101”). Mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates reflect the Company’s reasonable expectation that all necessary permits and approvals will be obtained and maintained.
(3) Cautionary note to U.S. investors concerning estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources. These estimates have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Canadian securities laws, which differ from the requirements of United States’ securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, mining terms used herein and in any document incorporated by reference but not otherwise defined have the meanings set forth in NI 43-101. The terms “mineral reserve”, “proven mineral reserve”, “probable mineral reserve”, “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with NI 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards. These definitions differ from the definitions in subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K (“Subpart 1300”). While the definitions in Subpart 1300 are similar to the definitions in NI 43-101 and the CIM Definitions Standard, the definitions in Subpart 1300 differ from the requirements of, and the definitions in, NI 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards. U.S. investors are cautioned that while the above terms are “substantially similar” to CIM Definitions, there are differences in the definitions in Subpart 1300 and the CIM Definition Standards. Accordingly, there is no assurance any mineral reserves or mineral resources that the Company may report as “proven mineral reserves”, “probable mineral reserves”, “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” under NI 43-101 would be the same had the Company prepared the mineral reserve or mineral resource estimates under the standards set forth in Subpart 1300. U.S. investors are also cautioned that while the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recognizes “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” under Subpart 1300, investors should not assume that any part or all of the mineralization in these categories will ever be converted into a higher category of mineral resources or into mineral reserves. Mineralization described using these terms has a greater amount of uncertainty as to its existence and feasibility than mineralization that has been characterized as reserves. Accordingly, investors are cautioned not to assume that any measured mineral resources, indicated mineral resources, or inferred mineral resources that the Company reports are or will be economically or legally mineable. Further, “inferred mineral resources” have a greater amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically. Therefore, U.S. investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the “inferred mineral resources” exist. Under Canadian securities laws, estimates of “inferred mineral resources” may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. As a foreign private issuer that files its annual report on Form 40-F with the SEC pursuant to the multi-jurisdictional disclosure system, the Company is not required to provide disclosure on its mineral properties under the Subpart 1300 provisions and will continue to provide disclosure under NI 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards. If the Company ceases to be a foreign private issuer or loses its eligibility to file its annual report on Form 40-F pursuant to the multi-jurisdictional disclosure system, then the Company will be subject to reporting pursuant to the Subpart 1300 provisions, which differ from the requirements of NI 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards.
For the above reasons, the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates and related information herein may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.
(4) The Company’s mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates were prepared under the supervision of and verified by Mr. Nicos Pfeiffer, who is a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101.
(5) The Company’s normal data verification procedures have been used in collecting, compiling, interpreting and processing the data used to estimate mineral reserves and mineral resource.
(6) Rounding of values to the 000s may result in apparent discrepancies.
(7) Round Mountain refers to the Round Mountain project, which includes the Round Mountain deposit and the Gold Hill deposit. The Round Mountain deposit does not contain silver and all silver resources at Round Mountain are contained exclusively within the Gold Hill deposit. Disclosure of gold mineral reserves and mineral resources reflect both the Round Mountain deposit and the Gold Hill deposit. Disclosure of silver mineral reserves and mineral resources reflect only the Gold Hill deposit.
(8) Includes mineral resources and mineral reserves from the Puren deposit in which the Company holds a
(9) Mineral resources are exclusive of mineral reserves.
(10) Unless otherwise noted, the Company’s mineral resources are estimated using appropriate cut-off grades based on a gold price of
(11) Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have to demonstrate economic viability. Mineral resources are subject to infill drilling, permitting, mine planning, mining dilution and recovery losses, among other things, to be converted into mineral reserves. Due to the uncertainty associated with inferred mineral resources, it cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to indicated or measured mineral resources, including as a result of continued exploration.
(12) The mineral resource estimates for Curlew assume a
Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Statement Definitions
A ‘Mineral Resource’ is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling.
An ‘Inferred Mineral Resource’ is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.
An ‘Indicated Mineral Resource’ is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of Modifying Factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from adequately detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to assume geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource and may only be converted to a Probable Mineral Reserve.
A ‘Measured Mineral Resource’ is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of Modifying Factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to confirm geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. A Measured Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than that applying to either an Indicated Mineral Resource or an Inferred Mineral Resource. It may be converted to a Proven Mineral Reserve or to a Probable Mineral Reserve.
A ‘Mineral Reserve’ is the economically mineable part of a Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when the material is mined or extracted and is defined by studies at Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility level as appropriate that include application of Modifying Factors. Such studies demonstrate that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified. The reference point at which Mineral Reserves are defined, usually the point where the ore is delivered to the processing plant, must be stated. It is important that, in all situations where the reference point is different, such as for a saleable product, a clarifying statement is included to ensure that the reader is fully informed as to what is being reported. The public disclosure of a Mineral Reserve must be demonstrated by a Pre-Feasibility Study or Feasibility Study.
A ‘Probable Mineral Reserve’ is the economically mineable part of an Indicated, and in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource. The confidence in the Modifying Factors applying to a Probable Mineral Reserve is lower than that applying to a Proven Mineral Reserve.
A ‘Proven Mineral Reserve’ is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource. A Proven Mineral Reserve implies a high degree of confidence in the Modifying Factors.
Cautionary statement on forward-looking information
All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained or incorporated by reference in this news release including, but not limited to, any information as to the future financial or operating performance of Kinross, constitute “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of certain securities laws, including the provisions of the Securities Act (Ontario) and the provisions for “safe harbor” under the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are based on expectations, estimates and projections as of the date of this news release. Forward-looking statements contained in this news release, include, but are not limited to, those under the headings (or headings that include) “2025 full-year results and 2026 guidance”, “2025 Q4 and full-year highlights”, “Development project and mineral reserves and resources highlights”, “CEO commentary”, “Return of capital”, “Development projects” and “Company Guidance”, as well as statements with respect to our guidance for production, cost guidance, including production costs of sales, all-in sustaining cost of sales, and capital expenditures; anticipated returns of capital to shareholders, including the declaration, payment, increase and sustainability of the Company’s dividends; the size, scope and execution of the proposed share buybacks and the anticipated timing thereof, including the Company’s statement targeting share buybacks for 2026 of
Key Sensitivities
Approximately
A
Specific to the Brazilian real, a
Specific to the Chilean peso, a
A
A
Other information
Where we say "we", "us", "our", the "Company", or "Kinross" in this news release, we mean Kinross Gold Corporation and/or one or more or all of its subsidiaries, as may be applicable.
The technical information about the Company’s mineral properties contained in this news release has been prepared under the supervision of Mr. Nicos Pfeiffer, an officer of the Company who is a “qualified person” within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101.
Source: Kinross Gold Corporation
________________________
1 Unless otherwise stated, production figures in this news release are on an attributable basis. “Attributable” includes Kinross’
2 “Production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold” is defined as production cost of sales, as reported on the consolidated statements of operations, divided by total gold equivalent ounces sold.
3 Capital expenditures is reported as "Additions to property, plant and equipment" on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
4 “Margins” per equivalent ounce sold is defined as average realized gold price per ounce less production cost of sales per equivalent ounce sold.
5 Operating cash flow figures in this release represent “Net cash flow provided from operating activities,” as reported on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
6 Earnings, net earnings, and reported net earnings figures in this release represent “Net earnings attributable to common shareholders,” as reported on the consolidated statements of operations.
7 These figures are non-GAAP financial measures and ratios, as applicable. They are defined and actual results are reconciled on pages 27 to 33 of this news release. Non-GAAP financial measures and ratios have no standardized meaning under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers.
8 Adjusted net earnings figures in this news release represent “Adjusted net earnings attributable to common shareholders.”
9 Net cash is calculated as cash and cash equivalents of
10 “Total liquidity” is defined as the sum of cash and cash equivalents, as reported on the consolidated balance sheets, and available credit under the Company’s credit facilities (as calculated in Section 6 Liquidity and Capital Resources of Kinross’ MD&A for the year ended December 31, 2025).
11 “Average realized gold price per ounce” is defined as gold revenue divided by total gold ounces sold.
12 “Available credit” is defined as available credit under the Company’s credit facilities and is calculated in Section 6 Liquidity and Capital Resources of Kinross’ MD&A for the year ended December 31, 2025.
13 The economic analysis of the projects were carried out using a discounted cash flow approach on an after-tax basis, based on a long-term gold price of
14 The NPV was calculated from the after-tax cash flow generated by the project, based on a discount rate of
15 Attributable gold equivalent ounce production guidance for 2026 includes approximately 3.3 million ounces of silver.
16 The percentages are calculated based on the mid-point of country 2025 forecast production.
17 Refers to all of the currencies in the countries where the Company has mining operations, fluctuating simultaneously by
18 Forecast 2026 sustaining, non-sustaining and total forecast capital expenditures are on an attributable basis and include Kinross’ share of Manh Choh (
19 The forecast ETR range for 2026 assumes gold price, foreign exchange and tax rates in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates remain stable and within 2026 guidance assumptions. The ETR does not include the impact of items which the Company believes are not reflective of the Company’s underlying performance, such as the impact of net foreign currency translations on tax deductions and taxes related to prior periods. Management believes that the ETR range provides investors with the ability to better evaluate the Company’s underlying performance. However, the ETR range is not necessarily an indicator of tax expense recognized under IFRS. The rate is sensitive to the relative proportion of sales between the Company’s various tax jurisdictions and realized gold prices.
20 DD&A ($/oz) is defined as depreciation, depletion and amortization, as reported on the consolidated statements of operations, divided by total gold equivalent ounces sold.
21 Please see pages 38 and 39 for Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Statements and Notes.
22 Rounding of values to the 000s may result in apparent discrepancies.