STOCK TITAN

Pacira Presents Real-World Data on EXPAREL® Showing Lower Total Healthcare Costs in Outpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Procedures

Rhea-AI Impact
(Moderate)
Rhea-AI Sentiment
(Positive)
Tags

Pacira (NASDAQ: PCRX) presented three real-world HOPD analyses at AMCP 2026 showing EXPAREL (liposomal bupivacaine) was associated with lower or comparable total healthcare costs and reduced opioid use in select cohorts through six months.

Key findings: THA costs were lower at 3 months ($7,332 vs $8,153) and 6 months ($13,022 vs $15,081); TKA showed comparable or lower costs, notably in teaching hospitals; a 3-year budget model projected −$117,868 per 1M members versus ropivacaine.

Loading...
Loading translation...

Positive

  • THA cost reduction of ~10.6% at 3 months ($7,332 vs $8,153)
  • THA cost reduction of ~13.6% at 6 months ($13,022 vs $15,081)
  • 3-year budget impact projected −$117,868 per 1 million members versus ropivacaine

Negative

  • Higher pharmacy acquisition costs for EXPAREL despite overall offsets
  • Marginal PMPM savings of −$0.003, indicating limited per-member benefit

News Market Reaction – PCRX

+1.13%
1 alert
+1.13% News Effect

On the day this news was published, PCRX gained 1.13%, reflecting a mild positive market reaction.

Data tracked by StockTitan Argus on the day of publication.

Key Figures

THA 3M cost LB vs non-LB: $7,332 vs $8,153 THA 6M cost LB vs non-LB: $13,022 vs $15,081 Low back pain 6M cost: $13,614 vs $18,652 +5 more
8 metrics
THA 3M cost LB vs non-LB $7,332 vs $8,153 Total healthcare costs at 3 months post-THA in Medicare Advantage
THA 6M cost LB vs non-LB $13,022 vs $15,081 Total healthcare costs at 6 months post-THA in Medicare Advantage
Low back pain 6M cost $13,614 vs $18,652 THA subgroup with history of low back pain at 6 months
Opioid reduction 6M 51 fewer MMEs THA low back pain subgroup vs non-LB at 6 months (P=0.027)
TKA matched patients 7,840 patients Real-world TKA cohort, 3,920 per treatment group
Teaching hospitals cost diff −$1,527 to −$1,511 Adjusted cost differences favoring LB at surgical visit and follow-up
3-year budget impact −$117,868 Projected cumulative cost difference per 1M members by year 3 vs ropivacaine
Per-patient opioid-addiction scenario −$189 per patient/year Scenario analysis cost difference vs ropivacaine including opioid addiction

Market Reality Check

Price: $24.51 Vol: Volume 248,860 vs 20-day ...
low vol
$24.51 Last Close
Volume Volume 248,860 vs 20-day average 702,419 (relative volume 0.35x), suggesting limited pre-news positioning. low
Technical Shares at 23.79, trading slightly above the 200-day MA at 23.53.

Peers on Argus

PCRX was roughly flat (-0.13%) while peers were mixed: COLL -0.48%, AMPH -2.91%,...

PCRX was roughly flat (-0.13%) while peers were mixed: COLL -0.48%, AMPH -2.91%, HROW -4.16%, DVAX +0.06%, AVDL 0%. Moves do not indicate a coordinated sector reaction.

Historical Context

5 past events · Latest: Apr 08 (Positive)
Pattern 5 events
Date Event Sentiment Move Catalyst
Apr 08 Conference participation Positive +3.2% Announcement of Needham healthcare conference fireside chat and inducement equity awards.
Mar 30 Cost-of-care data Positive +1.7% Real-world EXPAREL studies showing lower total cost of care in TKA and spinal fusion.
Mar 12 Activist campaign Neutral +3.1% DOMA Perpetual nominates three directors, escalating governance engagement with Pacira.
Mar 11 Strategy update Positive +3.1% Company reiterates 5x30 strategy, strong margins, buybacks, and EXPAREL patent expansion.
Mar 11 Activist campaign Neutral +1.7% Additional DOMA nomination notice reinforcing proxy contest messaging and board challenge.
Pattern Detected

Recent news, including cost-of-care data and governance developments, has generally coincided with positive 24-hour price reactions.

Recent Company History

Over the past month, Pacira has combined scientific messaging with governance and capital-allocation developments. On Mar 11, 2026, it reaffirmed its shareholder value strategy, highlighting 2.5M patients treated, 79% GAAP gross margin, and $150M of buybacks, which coincided with a positive price move. Activist filings from DOMA on Mar 11–12 also saw shares rise. More recently, real-world EXPAREL cost-of-care data on Mar 30 and a conference fireside chat announcement on Apr 8 were followed by additional gains, suggesting the market has reacted constructively to diverse catalysts.

Market Pulse Summary

This announcement highlights multiple real-world and modeled analyses suggesting EXPAREL use in outp...
Analysis

This announcement highlights multiple real-world and modeled analyses suggesting EXPAREL use in outpatient THA and TKA may reduce total healthcare costs and opioid exposure over periods up to 6 months. It reinforces an ongoing narrative from prior cost-of-care presentations that support the product’s health-economic value. Investors may watch for additional payer, guideline, or utilization updates and for how these data intersect with the company’s broader strategic and governance developments.

Key Terms

liposomal bupivacaine, morphine milligram equivalents, retrospective, cohort study, +4 more
8 terms
liposomal bupivacaine medical
"between liposomal bupivacaine (LB) use and healthcare expenditures and opioid utilizat"
A long-acting local anesthetic formulated by enclosing the drug bupivacaine inside microscopic lipid capsules so the medicine is released slowly over time. For investors, it matters because this “time-release” design can reduce post-surgery pain and the need for additional drugs or hospital stays, potentially affecting a product’s market demand, reimbursement, and competitive position in surgical and pain-management markets.
morphine milligram equivalents medical
"numerically lower opioid utilization at 3 months (26 fewer morphine milligram equivale"
Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) are a way to convert different opioid drug doses into a single common measure based on their pain-relieving strength compared with morphine, like converting various currencies into dollars to compare value. Investors care because MME levels reveal prescribing intensity and patient exposure, which affect regulatory scrutiny, safety warnings, liability risk, and future sales forecasts for companies tied to opioid products or pain-management services.
retrospective medical
"This retrospective, real-world analysis evaluated the association between liposomal bu"
A retrospective analysis or study looks backward at information that already exists — such as past sales, clinical records, or historical financial data — rather than collecting new data going forward. For investors, it matters because findings based on past records can be produced quickly and cheaply but may be less reliable than forward-looking studies; think of it like reviewing security-camera footage to explain what happened rather than running a live experiment to predict what will happen next.
cohort study medical
"retrospective, real-world cohort study evaluated the association between liposomal bu"
A cohort study follows a specific group of people who share a common trait (like exposure to a drug or treatment) over time to see how many develop a particular outcome, such as a health effect. For investors, cohort studies matter because they provide real-world evidence about a product’s safety, effectiveness or market need—think of tracking a cohort like watching a neighborhood over years to see who adopts a new service and whether it works as promised.
per-member-per-month financial
"cumulative cost difference of −$117,868 per 1 million members, corresponding to a rel"
Per-member-per-month (PMPM) is a unit measure showing the average amount of revenue or cost attributed to each enrolled member for one month, regardless of whether they used any services. Investors use PMPM like a household utility bill per person to compare profitability, track changes in pricing or costs over time, and gauge scalability and risk in subscription-style businesses such as health plans and managed care programs.
hospital outpatient department medical
"arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures performed in hospital"
A hospital outpatient department is the part of a hospital that provides medical care, tests, minor procedures and follow-up visits to patients who do not stay overnight — like a clinic attached to a full hospital. Investors care because these departments generate steady, often higher-paid revenue streams, are subject to specific insurance and regulatory payment rules, and can signal patient demand, cost structure and profit margins for a health provider.
Medicare Advantage financial
"following total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed in hospital outpatient department (H"
Medicare Advantage is a type of health insurance plan offered by private companies that covers services traditionally provided by government-run Medicare. Think of it as a bundled package that combines hospital, doctor, and other medical care into one plan, often with added benefits. For investors, it matters because the popularity and profitability of these plans can influence healthcare companies and the broader health insurance industry.
sensitivity analyses technical
"Sensitivity analyses varying standard errors demonstrated consistent model results, w"
Sensitivity analyses test how the result of a financial forecast or valuation changes when one or more inputs (sales, costs, interest rates, etc.) are adjusted. They matter to investors because they reveal which assumptions drive the most risk or opportunity—like nudging different dials on a machine to see which one makes it overheat—helping prioritize questions, stress-test scenarios and make better-informed decisions.

AI-generated analysis. Not financial advice.

-- Select findings demonstrate that the use of EXPAREL® (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) in outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with lower total healthcare costs over various follow-up periods

-- Reduced opioid use observed at 6 months post-surgery among Medicare Advantage patients with low back pain in THA Study --

BRISBANE, Calif., April 13, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: PCRX), the industry leader in its commitment to deliver innovative, non-opioid pain therapies to transform the lives of patients, today presented data from three real-world studies supporting the economic value of EXPAREL® (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures performed in hospital outpatient department (HOPD) settings at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Annual 2026 Meeting, taking place April 13-16 in Nashville, Tennessee. Across the analyses, EXPAREL use was associated with lower or comparable total healthcare costs and reduced opioid utilization in certain patient populations over follow-up periods of up to six months.

Select findings include:

  • In one study, the use of EXPAREL for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) was associated with lower total healthcare costs over 3 and 6 months of post-surgical follow-up.
    • More pronounced cost savings for patients with lower back pain as well as reduced opioid usage compared to patients who did not receive liposomal bupivacaine (non-LB) were also observed.
  • In the second assessment, EXPAREL use during HOPD Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) was associated with comparable or lower healthcare costs, particularly in teaching hospitals.
  • The third assessment was a three-year budget impact analysis, that found that EXPAREL use was associated with a projected cumulative absolute cost difference of −$117,868 per 1 million members by year 3 compared to ropivacaine in the HOPD Commercial and Medicare Advantage settings, with higher pharmacy acquisition costs offset by reductions in total healthcare expenditures.

“These real-world data continue to demonstrate the economic value that EXPAREL can deliver across outpatient orthopedic procedures,” said Brendan Teehan, Chief Commercial Officer of Pacira Biosciences. “By helping reduce total healthcare costs, lowering opioid use, and supporting more efficient recovery in real-world settings, these data reinforce our commitment to advancing non-opioid pain management solutions that benefit patients, providers, and payers alike. We believe these findings further support the role of EXPAREL in improving access to effective and best-practice opioid-sparing pain control while addressing the broader challenges of affordability and opioid stewardship.”

Pacira Presentations at AMCP 2026:

  1. Real-World Assessment of Healthcare Expenditures and Opioid Intake Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries” (Poster #363)

    This retrospective, real-world analysis evaluated the association between liposomal bupivacaine (LB) use and healthcare expenditures and opioid utilization over 6 months following total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed in hospital outpatient department (HOPD) settings among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.

    LB use was associated with lower total healthcare costs at 3 months ($7,332 vs $8,153; P=0.007) and 6 months ($13,022 vs $15,081; P<0.001) following surgery compared with non-LB. These differences were primarily driven by lower outpatient costs at 3 months ($2,161 vs $2,472; P=0.015) and 6 months ($4,421 vs $5,897; P<0.001).

    In a subgroup of patients with a history of low back pain, LB use was associated with lower total healthcare costs at 1 month ($3,997 vs $5,250; P<0.001), 3 months ($7,604 vs $9,696; P=0.004), and 6 months ($13,614 vs $18,652; P<0.001). LB use was also associated with numerically lower opioid utilization at 3 months (26 fewer morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]; P=0.171) and significantly lower opioid utilization at 6 months (51 fewer MMEs; P=0.027) compared with non-LB use.
    Presenter: Haiyan Li, Senior Manager, Medical Economics Research, Health Outcomes Ecom Res & RWE, Pacira BioSciences
    Poster Number363
    Date & Time: April 14, 4:30-5:30 pm

  2. “Postoperative Pain Management in Association with Total Cost of Care Among Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Hospital Outpatient Department: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Assessment” (Poster #365)

    This retrospective, real-world cohort study evaluated the association between liposomal bupivacaine (LB) use and total healthcare costs among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in hospital outpatient department (HOPD) settings, including subgroup analyses in teaching hospitals.

    Among 7,840 matched patients (3,920 per cohort), LB use was associated with numerically lower adjusted mean total healthcare costs compared with non-LB use across evaluated time points. At the surgical visit, adjusted mean costs were $15,600 for the LB cohort and $15,719 for the non-LB cohort (adjusted difference [AD]: −$119; 95% CI, −$477 to $221). At 7 days since surgery, costs were $15,692 versus $15,805 (AD: −$113; 95% CI, −$460 to $218), and at 30 days since surgery, $15,949 versus $16,056 (AD: −$108; 95% CI, −$489 to $262).

    In a subgroup analysis of teaching hospitals, LB use was associated with lower adjusted costs at all evaluated time points, with statistically significant differences observed at the surgical visit (AD: −$1,527; 95% CI, −$2,292 to −$725), 7 days since surgery (AD: −$1,511; 95% CI, −$2,314 to −$656), and 30 days since surgery (AD: −$1,511; 95% CI, −$2,323 to −$753).

    Pharmacy costs on the day of surgery in teaching hospitals were lower in the LB cohort compared with the non-LB cohort ($1,031 vs $2,872, respectively).
    Presenter: Jennifer Lin, Senior Director, Epidemiology, Health Outcomes Ecom Res & RWE
    Poster Number365
    Date & Time: April 14, 4:30-5:30 pm

  3. “Budget Impact of Liposomal Bupivacaine in the Commercial and Medicare Advantage Hospital Outpatient Department Setting for Total Knee Arthroplasty” (Poster #364)

    This impact model evaluated the projected economic impact of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) compared with ropivacaine for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the hospital outpatient department (HOPD) setting from the perspective of Commercial and Medicare Advantage payers over a 3-year time horizon, using a simulated 1-million member health plan.

    By year 3, LB use was associated with a projected cumulative cost difference of −$117,868 per 1 million members, corresponding to a relative budget impact of −0.07% and per-member-per-month (PMPM) savings of −$0.003 compared with ropivacaine.

    Sensitivity analyses varying standard errors demonstrated consistent model results, with projected annual budget impact ranging from −$124,745 to −$111,018 and stable PMPM estimates over the 3-year period. Additional sensitivity analyses using ±30% parameter variation yielded a projected range of −$154,846 to −$81,644 in annual budget impact.

    In a scenario analysis incorporating opioid addiction, LB use was associated with projected cost differences of −$189 per patient per year compared with ropivacaine.

    Overall, the model suggests that, within the parameters and assumptions evaluated, LB use may be associated with a budget-neutral impact compared with ropivacaine in the HOPD setting, with higher pharmacy acquisition costs offset by reductions in total healthcare expenditures.
    Presenters: Jennifer Lin, Senior Director, Epidemiology, Health Outcomes Ecom Res & RWE
    Poster Number364
    Date & Time: April 14, 4:30-5:30 pm

About Pacira

Pacira delivers innovative, non-opioid pain therapies to transform the lives of patients. Pacira has three commercial-stage non-opioid treatments: EXPAREL® (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension), a long-acting local analgesic currently approved for infiltration, fascial plane block, and as an interscalene brachial plexus nerve block, an adductor canal nerve block, and a sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa for postsurgical pain management; ZILRETTA® (triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension), an extended-release, intra-articular injection indicated for the management of osteoarthritis knee pain; and ioveraº, a novel, handheld device for delivering immediate, long-acting, drug-free pain control using precise, controlled doses of cold temperature to a targeted nerve. The company is also advancing a pipeline of clinical-stage assets for musculoskeletal pain and adjacencies, its most advanced oduct candidate, PCRX-201 (enekinragene inzadenovec), a novel, locally administered gene therapy, is in Phase 2 clinical development for OA of the knee. To learn more about Pacira, visit www.pacira.com.

About EXPAREL® (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension)

EXPAREL is indicated to produce postsurgical local analgesia via infiltration in patients aged 6 years and older, and postsurgical regional analgesia via an interscalene brachial plexus block in adults, a sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa in adults, and an adductor canal block in adults. The safety and effectiveness of EXPAREL have not been established to produce postsurgical regional analgesia via other nerve blocks besides an interscalene brachial plexus nerve block, a sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa, or an adductor canal block. The product combines bupivacaine with multivesicular liposomes, a proven product delivery technology that delivers medication over a desired time period. EXPAREL represents the first and only multivesicular liposome local anesthetic that can be utilized in the peri- or postsurgical setting. By utilizing the multivesicular liposome platform, a single dose of EXPAREL delivers bupivacaine over time, providing significant reductions in cumulative pain scores with up to a 78 percent decrease in opioid consumption; the clinical benefit of the opioid reduction was not demonstrated. Additional information is available at www.EXPAREL.com.

Important Safety Information about EXPAREL for Patients

EXPAREL should not be used in obstetrical paracervical block anesthesia. In studies in adults where EXPAREL was injected into a wound, the most common side effects were nausea, constipation, and vomiting. In studies in adults where EXPAREL was injected near a nerve, the most common side effects were nausea, fever, and constipation. In the study where EXPAREL was given to children, the most common side effects were nausea, vomiting, constipation, low blood pressure, low number of red blood cells, muscle twitching, blurred vision, itching, and rapid heartbeat. EXPAREL can cause a temporary loss of feeling and/or loss of muscle movement. How much and how long the loss of feeling and/or muscle movement depends on where and how much of EXPAREL was injected and may last for up to 5 days. EXPAREL is not recommended to be used in patients younger than 6 years old for injection into the wound, for patients younger than 18 years old, for injection near a nerve, and/or in pregnant women. Tell your health care provider if you or your child has liver disease, since this may affect how the active ingredient (bupivacaine) in EXPAREL is eliminated from the body. EXPAREL should not be injected into the spine, joints, or veins. The active ingredient in EXPAREL can affect the nervous system and the cardiovascular system; may cause an allergic reaction; may cause damage if injected into the joints; and can cause a rare blood disorder.

Forward-Looking Statements

Any statements in this press release about Pacira’s future expectations, plans, trends, outlook, projections and prospects, and other statements containing the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “can” and similar expressions, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, without limitation, statements related to: the contributions of new directors; '5x30', our growth and business strategy, our future outlook, the strength and efficacy of our intellectual property protection and patent terms, our future growth potential and future financial and operating results and trends, our plans, objectives, expectations (financial or otherwise) and intentions, including our plans with respect to the repayment of our indebtedness, anticipated product portfolio and product development programs, strategic alliances, plans with respect to the Non-Opioids Prevent Addiction in the Nation (“NOPAIN”) Act and any other statements that are not historical facts. For this purpose, any statement that is not a statement of historical fact should be considered a forward-looking statement. We cannot assure you that our estimates, assumptions and expectations will prove to have been correct. Actual results may differ materially from these indicated by such forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including risks relating to, among others: risks associated with acquisitions, such as the risk that the acquired businesses and/or assets will not be integrated successfully, that such integration may be more difficult, time-consuming or costly than expected or that the expected benefits of the transaction will not occur; our manufacturing and supply chain, global and United States economic conditions (including tariffs, inflation and rising interest rates), and our business, including our revenues, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations; the success of our sales and manufacturing efforts in support of the commercialization of EXPAREL, ZILRETTA and iovera°; the rate and degree of market acceptance of EXPAREL, ZILRETTA and iovera°; the size and growth of the potential markets for EXPAREL, ZILRETTA and iovera° and our ability to serve those markets; our plans to expand the use of EXPAREL, ZILRETTA and iovera° to additional indications and opportunities, and the timing and success of any related clinical trials for EXPAREL, ZILRETTA, iovera° and any of our other product candidates, including but not limited to PCRX-201; the commercial success of EXPAREL, ZILRETTA and iovera°; the related timing and success of United States Food and Drug Administration supplemental New Drug Applications and premarket notification 510(k)s; the related timing and success of European Medicines Agency Marketing Authorization Applications; our plans to evaluate, develop and pursue additional product candidates utilizing our proprietary multivesicular liposome (“pMVL”) drug delivery technology or our proprietary high-capacity adenovirus (“HCAd”) vector platform; the approval of the commercialization of our products in other jurisdictions (by either us or our partners); clinical trials in support of an existing or potential pMVL- or HCAd-based product; our commercialization and marketing capabilities; our ability to successfully complete capital projects; the outcome of any litigation; the recoverability of our deferred tax assets; assumptions associated with contingent consideration payments; assumptions used for estimated future cash flows associated with determining the fair value of the company; the anticipated funding or benefits of our share repurchase program; and factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other filings that we periodically make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In addition, the forward-looking statements included in this press release represent our views as of the date of this press release. Important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated or implied by forward-looking statements, and as such we anticipate that subsequent events and developments will cause our views to change. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, and readers should not rely on these forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release.

These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these statements. These factors include the matters discussed and referenced in the “Risk Factors” of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other filings that we periodically make with the SEC.



Investor Contact: Susan Mesco, (973) 451-4030 susan.mesco@pacira.com                

Media Contact: Kim Hamilton, (908) 721-7067 kim.hamilton@pacira.com

FAQ

What cost differences did Pacira report for EXPAREL in outpatient total hip arthroplasty (PCRX) on April 13, 2026?

EXPAREL was associated with lower total healthcare costs: 3 months $7,332 versus $8,153 and 6 months $13,022 versus $15,081. According to Pacira, these differences were driven mainly by lower outpatient costs at 3 and 6 months.

How did EXPAREL affect opioid use after outpatient THA in the Medicare Advantage study (PCRX)?

EXPAREL was linked to reduced opioid utilization at 6 months, with 51 fewer MMEs (statistically significant). According to Pacira, the Medicare Advantage subgroup with low back pain showed the most pronounced opioid reduction.

What were the findings for EXPAREL in outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and teaching hospitals (PCRX)?

Overall TKA costs were comparable or lower; in teaching hospitals, adjusted costs were significantly lower at multiple time points (surgical visit AD −$1,527). According to Pacira, teaching-hospital subgroups showed the clearest cost advantages.

What did Pacira report about the budget impact of EXPAREL versus ropivacaine for HOPD TKA (PCRX) over three years?

A 3-year model projected a cumulative absolute cost difference of −$117,868 per 1 million members, a −0.07% relative impact and PMPM savings of −$0.003. According to Pacira, higher pharmacy costs were offset by reductions in total healthcare expenditures.

What payer and investor implications did Pacira highlight for EXPAREL in outpatient orthopedics (PCRX)?

Pacira suggests EXPAREL may reduce total healthcare costs and support opioid stewardship while raising pharmacy acquisition costs. According to Pacira, these real-world results could inform payer decisions and outpatient protocol adoption.