RedHill Biopharma Awarded Judgment of Approximately $8 Million Plus Costs by New York Supreme Court
Rhea-AI Summary
RedHill Biopharma has been awarded approximately $8 million plus costs in a summary judgment by the New York Supreme Court in its legal proceedings against Kukbo Co. The amount consists of $6.5 million plus interest of approximately $1.5 million. The case involves Kukbo's failure to make agreed payments to RedHill under a Subscription Agreement from October 25, 2021, and an Exclusive License Agreement from March 14, 2022. The Court dismissed all of Kukbo's counterclaims. Kukbo retains the right to seek an appeal of the judgment.
Positive
- Court awarded RedHill approximately $8 million ($6.5M + $1.5M interest) plus costs
- Complete dismissal of counterparty's claims
- Potential for additional recovery through attorneys' fees
Negative
- Judgment may be subject to appeal by Kukbo
- Uncertainty regarding timeline and ability to collect awarded amount
News Market Reaction – RDHL
On the day this news was published, RDHL declined 3.65%, reflecting a moderate negative market reaction.
Data tracked by StockTitan Argus on the day of publication.
The Court dismissed the entirety of Kukbo's counterclaims, ruling in favor of

The case refers to Kukbo's failure to make agreed payments to
Dror Ben-Asher,
Upon entry, Kukbo has a right to seek an appeal of the judgment, which may or may not be granted.
About RedHill Biopharma
RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (Nasdaq: RDHL) is a specialty biopharmaceutical company primarily focused on
More information about the Company is available at www.redhillbio.com / X.com/RedHillBio.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and may discuss investment opportunities, stock analysis, financial performance, investor relations, and market trends. Such statements may be preceded by the words "intends," "may," "will," "plans," "expects," "anticipates," "projects," "predicts," "estimates," "aims," "believes," "hopes," "potential" or similar words and include, among others, statements regarding the legal process going forward including Kukbo's rights to appeal. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and are subject to various known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company's control and cannot be predicted or quantified, and consequently, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation: market and other conditions; the risk that the Court's ruling will not be upheld in any subsequent appeal or that the provisions for reparation for the contractual breaches will not be honored; the Company's ability to maintain compliance with the Nasdaq Capital Market's listing requirements; the risk that the addition of new revenue generating products or out-licensing transactions will not occur; the risk that acceptance onto the RNCP Product Development Pipeline will not guarantee ongoing development or that any such development will not be completed or successful; the risk that the FDA does not agree with the Company's proposed development plans for opaganib for any indication; the risk that observations from preclinical studies are not indicative or predictive of results in clinical trials; the risk that the FDA pre-study requirements will not be met and/or that the Phase 3 study of RHB-107 in COVID-19 outpatients will not be approved to commence or if approved, will not be completed or, should that be the case, that we will not be successful in obtaining alternative non-dilutive development funding for RHB-107; the risk that RHB-107's late-stage development for non-hospitalized COVID-19 will not benefit from the resources redirected from the terminated RHB-204 Phase 3 study, and that the Phase 2/3 COVID-19 study for RHB-107 may not be successful and, even if successful, such studies and results may not be sufficient for regulatory applications, including emergency use or marketing applications, and that additional COVID-19 studies for opaganib and RHB-107 are likely to be required; the risk that the Company will not successfully commercialize its products; as well as risks and uncertainties associated with (i) the initiation, timing, progress and results of the Company's research, manufacturing, pre-clinical studies, clinical trials, and other therapeutic candidate development efforts, and the timing of the commercial launch of its commercial products and ones it may acquire or develop in the future; (ii) the Company's ability to advance its therapeutic candidates into clinical trials or to successfully complete its pre-clinical studies or clinical trials or the development of a commercial companion diagnostic for the detection of MAP; (iii) the extent and number and type of additional studies that the Company may be required to conduct and the Company's receipt of regulatory approvals for its therapeutic candidates, and the timing of other regulatory filings, approvals and feedback; (iv) the manufacturing, clinical development, commercialization, and market acceptance of the Company's therapeutic candidates and Talicia®; (v) the Company's ability to successfully commercialize and promote Talicia® and Aemcolo®; (vi) the Company's ability to establish and maintain corporate collaborations; (vii) the Company's ability to acquire products approved for marketing in the
Company contact: Adi Frish Chief Corporate & Business Development Officer RedHill Biopharma +972-54-6543-112 |
Category: Corporate
Logo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1334141/RedHill_Biopharma_Logo.jpg
[1] Talicia® (omeprazole magnesium, amoxicillin and rifabutin) is indicated for the treatment of H. pylori infection in adults. For full prescribing information see: www.Talicia.com.
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/redhill-biopharma-awarded-judgment-of-approximately-8-million-plus-costs-by-new-york-supreme-court-302319564.html
SOURCE RedHill Biopharma Ltd.
FAQ
How much was RedHill Biopharma (RDHL) awarded in the New York Supreme Court judgment?
What was the legal dispute between RedHill Biopharma (RDHL) and Kukbo about?
Can Kukbo appeal the court decision against RedHill Biopharma (RDHL)?