STOCK TITAN

VivoSim Presents Data Showing Superiority to Competition in NAM Liver Tox Prediction at European Toxicology Meeting

(Moderate)
(Neutral)
Tags

VivoSim (Nasdaq: VIVS) presented new data on its AI-enabled NAMkind Liver and NAMkind GI platforms at ESTIV 2026. In a 92-compound clinical liver dataset, NAMkind Liver showed 91% accuracy, 90% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 99% precision, and >90% sensitivity versus 50–65% for traditional methods.

The models produced <5% liver-toxicity false positives versus >10% for some current approaches and were used to characterize toxicity for small molecules, TKIs and antibody-drug conjugates, including Trastuzumab Emtansine and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan.

Loading...
Loading translation...

Positive

  • NAMkind Liver accuracy 91% on 92-compound clinical dataset
  • 90% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 99% precision in repeat-dose liver model
  • >90% liver-tox sensitivity versus traditional methods at 50–65%
  • <5% liver-tox false positives compared with >10% for some current methods
  • Validated across modalities including small molecules, TKIs and ADCs

Negative

  • None.

News Market Reaction – VIVS

+2.91% 7.6x vol
10 alerts
+2.91% Session close to close
+10.1% Peak Tracked
-13.3% Trough Tracked
$2.76M Market Cap
7.6x Rel. Volume

In the Jun 29 session, VIVS gained 2.91%, reflecting a moderate positive market reaction. Argus tracked a peak move of +10.1% during that session. Argus tracked a trough of -13.3% from its starting point during tracking. Our momentum scanner triggered 10 alerts that day, indicating notable trading interest and price volatility. Trading volume was exceptionally heavy at 7.6x the daily average, suggesting very strong buying interest.

Data tracked by StockTitan Argus on the day of publication.

Market Context

This announcement reinforces VIVS’s NAMkind platforms with 91% liver accuracy and improved false-pos...
Analysis

This announcement reinforces VIVS’s NAMkind platforms with 91% liver accuracy and improved false-positive rates versus animal tests. Investors may track conversion into commercial contracts and how future financings intersect with its low-priced equity base.

Key Figures

Liver tox sensitivity: >90% sensitivity False positives rate: <5% false positives Animal model sensitivity: 50–65% sensitivity +5 more
8 metrics
Liver tox sensitivity >90% sensitivity VivoSim NAMkind Liver detection of true-positive liver toxicity
False positives rate <5% false positives VivoSim liver toxicology methods vs viable non‑toxic drug candidates
Animal model sensitivity 50–65% sensitivity Traditional animal models and methods in liver toxicology testing
Animal model false positives >10% false positives Current methodologies including animal in vivo liver tox testing
Cost of a miss $50M–$200M Estimated cost to pharma when safety issues are missed preclinically
Predictive accuracy 91% accuracy NAMkind Liver spheroid model vs 92-compound clinical small‑molecule dataset
Compound dataset size 92 compounds Clinical small‑molecule benchmark set for liver toxicity prediction
Phase III ADCs 41 candidates ADC candidates reported as already in Phase III development globally

Historical Context

5 past events · Latest: Apr 28 (Positive)
Pattern 5 events
Date Event Sentiment 24h Move Catalyst
Apr 28 AI GI toxicity update Positive -0.7% Announced AI model predicting drug‑induced diarrhea using NAMkind intestinal data.
Apr 01 Public offering pricing Negative +13.3% Priced up to $4M best‑efforts equity offering with attached common warrants.
Mar 24 ADC toxicity data Positive -2.4% Released data validating NAMkind liver and intestine models for ADC toxicity prediction.
Mar 03 Sales leadership hire Positive -12.7% Appointed VP of Global Sales to drive commercial expansion of NAM services.
Feb 11 ADC data preview Positive +0.0% Planned debut of ADC validation data for NAMkind liver and intestine at SOT meeting.

24h Move is the share-price change in the day after each event; other market factors may also have contributed.

Pattern Detected

Recent VIVS news, often scientifically positive or strategic, has mostly coincided with flat-to-negative price reactions, with a notable divergence rally on an otherwise dilutive offering.

Key Terms

antibody drug conjugates (adcs), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (tki), preclinical safety, histological
4 terms
antibody drug conjugates (adcs) medical
"extensive testing of Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs), one of oncology’s fastest‑growing"
Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are specialized medicines that combine a targeted antibody with a powerful drug, designed to attack specific disease cells while minimizing harm to healthy ones. This approach allows for more precise treatment, often leading to better outcomes. For investors, ADCs represent innovative therapies with the potential for significant market impact and growth in the healthcare sector.
tyrosine kinase inhibitor (tki) medical
"resolve distinct mechanistic classes of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-induced diarrhea"
A tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is a type of drug that blocks specific proteins that act like cellular switches driving cell growth and division; by turning off those switches, TKIs can slow or stop the growth of certain cancers and other diseases. Investors care because TKIs can become long-lasting revenue drivers if proven safe and effective, but their commercial value depends heavily on clinical trial results, regulatory approval, patent protection, pricing and competition—making them high-reward, high-risk assets.
preclinical safety medical
"New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for preclinical safety, today announced that data"
Preclinical safety is the set of laboratory and animal tests done before a new drug or medical product is tried in people to identify toxic effects, safe dose ranges, and how the body handles the compound. It matters to investors because these early results greatly affect the odds, cost and timing of getting regulatory approval—think of it as crash‑testing a product: clear failures raise the risk of expensive delays or abandonment, while clean results de‑risk a program and can increase value.
histological medical
"injury is exposure-dependent and payload-driven through detailed histological tracking"
Relating to the microscopic study of tissues, histological describes how cells and tissue structures look when viewed under a microscope. For investors, histological results can confirm whether a drug or medical procedure actually changes disease tissue or causes harm — like inspecting the weave of fabric to spot repairs or tears — and those findings often influence trial outcomes, regulatory decisions, and commercial prospects.

AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

See more from StockTitan in Google Search and AI answers. Adds StockTitan as a preferred source · opens Google
Add on Google

VivoSim Demonstrates Leadership in Field through AI-enabled NAMkind™ Liver and Intestine with High Accuracy Results, Including for Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs)

SAN DIEGO, June 29, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- VivoSim Labs, Inc. (Nasdaq: VIVS) (the “Company” or “VivoSim”), a provider of next-generation New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for preclinical safety, today announced that data demonstrating the power of its advanced 3D human tissue models will be featured in two presentations at the European Society of Toxicology’s annual conference.

The presentations collectively showcase the best-in-industry predictive power of VivoSim's proprietary AI-enabled NAMkind™ Liver and NAMkind™ GI platforms. In liver toxicology testing, across a set of compounds where animal models and traditional methods provide 50-65% sensitivity, VivoSim’s models provided >90% sensitivity at detecting true positives for liver toxicity. Whereas current methodologies including animal in vivo testing can result in >10% false positives (wrongly predicted to have liver tox when they do not, causing rejection of a viable drug candidate), VivoSim’s liver toxicology methods result in fewer than 5% false positives.

These powerful results help VivoSim clients avoid expensive mistakes in drug development, at a time when the industry is undergoing a shift in preclinical safety evaluation. "With a heavy push from the US FDA, the pharmaceutical industry is moving away from traditional animal testing toward high-fidelity, human-relevant alternatives," said Keith Murphy, VivoSim Executive Chairman. "As our newest data show, using AI-informed models in highly accurate tissues, we detect the problems that pharma typically misses. When a pharma has a miss, the cost to them is many lost years and $50M - $200M, so strategic-thinking pharma executives are taking notice of the availability of better tools."

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is actively encouraging human-relevant NAMs in place of animal studies, a push that is resulting in greater pharma demand for new technologies. After presenting its April 2025 Roadmap to Reducing Animal Testing in Preclinical Safety Studies, the FDA recently reported that it is meeting its goals for stimulating pharma uptake of these new models. VivoSim’s novel models offer perhaps the most predictive tool to make FDA’s vision a reality.

VivoSim’s superior results are achieved by a combination of the best biological model with the most representative primary human cell types, leveraging multiple endpoints as readouts for best prediction, and training AI prediction models with multiple endpoints that provide a rich data set, yielding high prediction accuracy. In addition to testing traditional oral pill small molecules, VivoSim is establishing competitive advantages across new biotech modalities such as antibodies, siRNA, and gene therapies. Adding to the data supporting its industry leadership in small molecules as outlined above, the company has done extensive testing of Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs), one of oncology’s fastest-growing modalities, with comparable accuracy results in terms of predicting the clinical profiles of ADCs for liver toxicity and diarrhea. Globally, hundreds of ADC candidates are now in active clinical development against over 50 molecular targets — 41 of them already in Phase III — and the pipeline remains overwhelmingly oncology-focused, led by HER2- and TROP2-directed programs in breast and lung cancer. Therapies still fail in human trials, most often on safety or efficacy. VivoSim’s mission is to close gaps in the ability to predict outcomes before a drug enters expensive clinical trials.

“These results show our human-relevant models let developers move from detecting liabilities to predicting risk,” said Amar Sethi, MD, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer of VivoSim. “Whether we are unraveling the cause of TKI-induced diarrhea or guiding the design of safer, more effective ADC linker-payload combinations, our multi-endpoint profiling gives teams the translational signatures they need to retire toxic liabilities long before a single patient is dosed.”

Overall, the findings show that the Company’s human-relevant models can predict liver and gastrointestinal toxicity — for both traditional small molecules and complex antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) — with accuracy that tracks real clinical outcomes. The data are being presented at The 23rd International Congress of the European Society of Toxicology In Vitro (ESTIV 2026) in Maastricht, the Netherlands, which takes place from June 29 to July 2, 2026.

Key highlights of the presented data demonstrating VivoSim’s ability to achieve definitive translational signatures across complex organ systems:

  • High-Accuracy Liver Profiling: Benchmarked against a clinical small-molecule dataset of 92 compounds, the NAMkind™ Liver spheroid model achieved a predictive accuracy of 91%, with 90% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and 99% precision under repeat-dose conditions. The multi-endpoint profiling suite effectively minimized false negatives and successfully resolved intra-class toxicities, such as within thiazolidinediones (TZDs).

  • Mechanistic GI Insights: Using the multicellular human intestinal barrier model (NAMkind™ GI), VivoSim successfully integrated multiple endpoints including barrier function to resolve distinct mechanistic classes of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-induced diarrhea.

    Deconvolution of ADC Toxicity: Critically, both platforms demonstrated a unique capacity to evaluate advanced modalities by differentiating ADC risk based on structural properties. The GI model established that Trastuzumab-deruxtecan-mediated injury is exposure-dependent and payload-driven through detailed histological tracking. Meanwhile, the Liver model successfully differentiated hepatic risk based on linker stability and payload permeability when comparing Trastuzumab Emtansine and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan.

About VivoSim Labs

VivoSim Labs, Inc. (“VivoSim” and the “Company”), is a pharmaceutical and biotechnology services company that is focused on providing testing of drugs and drug candidates in three-dimensional (“3D”) human tissue models of liver and intestine. The Company offers partners liver and intestinal toxicology insights using its new approach methodologies (“NAM”) models. The Company anticipates accelerated adoption of human tissue models following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) announcement on April 10, 2025 to refine animal testing requirements in favor of these non-animal NAM methods. VivoSim Labs operates from San Diego, CA. Visit www.vivosim.ai.

Forward-Looking Statements

Any statements contained in this press release that do not describe historical facts constitute forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any forward-looking statements contained herein are based on current expectations but are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding NAMKind™, including target turnaround time and its potential to help users de-risk their pipelines, avoid costly downstream failures, reduce rework, prioritize the right assets, move faster, save millions and reduce risk; VivoSim’s commercial presence across Asia-Pacific; the evaluation and acceptance of scientifically robust NAM-based evidence; the Company’s ability to capture growing demand in the in vitro toxicology testing market; demand for human-relevant toxicology; the market opportunity and market size of gastrointestinal in vitro models and toxicology services; and the Company’s scaling capacity to support expanding global demand and development needs. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance and actual actions or events could differ materially from those contained in such statements. These risks and uncertainties and other factors are identified and described in more detail in the Company’s filings with the SEC, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 5, 2025, as such risk factors are updated in its most recently filed Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 11, 2026. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that they were made. These cautionary statements should be considered with any written or oral forward-looking statements that the Company may issue in the future. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, the Company does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to reflect actual results, later events, or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. 

Contact(s):
Investor Relations
info@vivosim.ai
VivoSim Labs, Inc.


FAQ

What liver toxicity prediction results did VivoSim (Nasdaq: VIVS) report at ESTIV 2026?

VivoSim reported its NAMkind Liver model reached 91% predictive accuracy for liver toxicity. According to VivoSim, benchmarking on 92 clinical small-molecule compounds showed 90% sensitivity, 95% specificity and 99% precision under repeat-dose conditions, while also minimizing false negatives and resolving intra-class toxicities such as within TZDs.

How does VivoSim’s NAMkind Liver sensitivity compare with traditional liver toxicology methods for VIVS?

VivoSim reported liver toxicity sensitivity above 90%, versus 50–65% for animal and traditional methods. According to VivoSim, its approach also reduced false positives to under 5%, compared with more than 10% for some current methodologies that can wrongly eliminate viable drug candidates.

What gastrointestinal insights did VivoSim (VIVS) present using its NAMkind GI model in 2026?

VivoSim showed that NAMkind GI can distinguish mechanistic classes of TKI-induced diarrhea. According to VivoSim, the multicellular intestinal barrier model integrates multiple endpoints, including barrier function, to resolve different tyrosine kinase inhibitor mechanisms driving diarrhea and to generate translational signatures for developers.

How does VivoSim’s platform assess antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) toxicity for liver and GI effects?

VivoSim reported its liver and GI platforms can differentiate ADC risk based on structural properties. According to VivoSim, NAMkind GI showed Trastuzumab Deruxtecan injury is exposure-dependent and payload-driven, while NAMkind Liver differentiated hepatic risk using linker stability and payload permeability for Trastuzumab Emtansine versus Trastuzumab Deruxtecan.

What drug modalities can VivoSim’s NAMkind Liver and GI models evaluate for VIVS customers?

VivoSim stated its models cover traditional small molecules, TKIs and advanced modalities such as ADCs. According to VivoSim, the platforms have been applied to antibodies, siRNA, gene therapies and extensive ADC testing, predicting clinical liver toxicity and diarrhea profiles across these different therapeutic approaches.

Why might pharma companies adopt VivoSim’s NAMkind platforms instead of animal testing?

VivoSim highlighted higher prediction accuracy and fewer false positives than many animal-based methods. According to VivoSim, the FDA is encouraging human-relevant NAMs, and miss-detected safety issues can cost drug developers many years and around $50–$200 million per failed program.