STOCK TITAN

Vistagen Announces Topline Results for Repeat Dose Study of Fasedienol for Acute Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder

(Positive)

Vistagen (Nasdaq: VTGN) reported topline results from an exploratory Phase 2, three‑arm, randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled study (N=61) of intranasal fasedienol for acute treatment of social anxiety disorder induced by a public speaking challenge. The trial compared repeat 3.2 µg dosing ten minutes apart, single 3.2 µg dosing, and placebo.

The study met its primary safety objective, with repeat dosing showing safety and tolerability comparable to single dosing and no new safety findings. Numerically greater reductions in subjective units of distress (SUDS) versus placebo were observed for pooled, repeat, and single‑dose fasedienol, though overall group differences were not statistically significant (p=0.2). In a prespecified very severe subgroup (baseline LSAS ≥95), pooled and single‑dose fasedienol showed nominally statistically significant SUDS improvements versus placebo (p=0.04 and p=0.05).

Responder rates on CGI‑I and PGI‑C were directionally higher for fasedienol than placebo, with repeat‑dose responder rates more than twice placebo overall and at least four times placebo in the very severe subgroup. A prespecified exploratory analysis of anticipatory anxiety showed larger SUDS reductions for pooled and repeat‑dose fasedienol versus placebo, with nominal statistical significance (p=0.03 and p=0.01). Vistagen indicated these data, together with prior Phase 2 and Phase 3 results, will inform discussions with the FDA about a potential registrational pathway for fasedienol.

Loading...
Loading translation...

Positive

  • Repeat dosing safety comparable to single dose with no new safety findings
  • Primary SUDS change pooled fasedienol -15.0 vs placebo -6.8 (Cohen’s d=0.46)
  • Very severe subgroup SUDS pooled fasedienol -16.2 vs -1.6 placebo, p=0.04
  • CGI-I responders overall 47% repeat dose vs 19% placebo
  • PGI-C responders overall 42% repeat dose vs 19% placebo
  • Anticipatory anxiety SUDS -19.3 repeat dose vs -0.9 placebo, p=0.01

Negative

  • Primary endpoint overall treatment differences vs placebo not statistically significant (p=0.2)
  • Small sample size total N=61, very severe subgroup N=24 limiting precision
  • Nominal significance only several findings described as nominally statistically significant and exploratory

Market Context

Across five tag-matched clinical-trial events, the platform recorded an average move of -30.94%. Tha...
Analysis

Across five tag-matched clinical-trial events, the platform recorded an average move of -30.94%. That history contextualized the repeat-dose findings; the exploratory design and low short positioning remained relevant risk considerations.

Key Figures

Study sample size: N=61 Repeat-dose regimen: Two 3.2 µg doses 10 minutes apart Pooled primary SUDS change: -15.0, p=0.10, Cohen's d=0.46 +5 more
8 metrics
Study sample size N=61 Exploratory Phase 2 repeat-dose study
Repeat-dose regimen Two 3.2 µg doses 10 minutes apart Compared with a single 3.2 µg dose and placebo
Pooled primary SUDS change -15.0, p=0.10, Cohen's d=0.46 Pooled fasedienol, N=40, from Visit 2 to Visit 3
Placebo primary SUDS change -6.8 Placebo arm, N=21, from Visit 2 to Visit 3
Very severe subgroup result -16.2, p=0.04, Cohen's d=0.78 Pooled fasedienol, N=24, baseline LSAS ≥95
Repeat-dose CGI-I responders 47% vs. 19% placebo Total study population
Very severe repeat-dose CGI-I responders 60% vs. 15% placebo Very severe social anxiety subgroup
Anticipatory anxiety change -19.3, p=0.01, Cohen's d=0.83 Repeat-dose fasedienol, N=19

Previous Clinical trial Reports

5 past events · Latest: Jun 30 (Negative)
Same Type Pattern 5 events
Date Event Sentiment 24h Move Catalyst
Jun 30 Phase 3 trial data Negative -70.3% Overall primary and secondary endpoints were not met despite a very severe subgroup signal.
May 12 Phase 3 extension data Positive -7.7% Preliminary open-label data showed tolerability and exploratory social-anxiety improvements.
May 08 Phase 3 trial update Neutral +4.0% The company completed the randomized portion and scheduled topline results for Q2 2026.
Apr 22 Phase 2 regulatory data Positive -0.5% FDA Study May Proceed clearance enabled further Phase 2 development of refisolone.
Dec 17 Phase 3 trial data Negative -80.3% PALISADE-3 missed its primary endpoint and showed no secondary endpoint treatment differences.

24h Move is the share-price change in the day after each event; other market factors may also have contributed.

Pattern Detected

Across five tag-matched clinical-trial events, the average 24-hour reaction was -30.94%; negative endpoint announcements aligned with declines, while positive updates generally diverged.

Key Terms

subjective units of distress (suds), cohen’s d effect size, liebowitz social anxiety scale (lsas), open label extension
4 terms
subjective units of distress (suds) medical
"LS mean change in subjective units of distress (SUDS) score"
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDS) are a simple, self-reported scale—usually 0 to 100—people use to rate how upset, anxious, or distressed they feel at a given moment. Investors watch SUDS-based measures in clinical studies, therapy programs, or digital mental-health products because changes in these scores can indicate whether a treatment or service is working, much like a thermometer shows whether a fever is rising or falling and thus helps predict commercial success or regulatory progress.
cohen’s d effect size technical
"p=0.10(Cohen’s d effect size=0.46)"
A standardized measure of the difference between two group means, Cohen’s d expresses how many pooled standard deviations apart the groups are. Think of it like measuring the gap between two averages in “standard steps,” so a value of 0.5 means the averages differ by half a typical spread. Investors use it to judge the practical size of effects reported in studies or performance comparisons, beyond whether the difference is merely statistically significant.
liebowitz social anxiety scale (lsas) medical
"baseline Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) score of ≥ 95"
A standardized questionnaire used by clinicians and researchers to measure the severity of social anxiety symptoms; it asks about fear and avoidance in common social situations and gives a score that tracks change over time. Think of it as a thermometer for social fear—useful in clinical trials and regulatory reviews because improvements on this scale are often used as evidence that a treatment works, which directly affects approval chances, prescribing labels and market value for related therapies.
open label extension medical
"which included an open label extension, was designed to assess"
An open-label extension is a follow-on phase of a clinical trial where participants keep receiving the experimental drug and both doctors and patients know what treatment is being given. It matters to investors because it produces longer-term safety and effectiveness information, helps regulators and companies assess ongoing benefits or risks, and can indicate whether a therapy has staying commercial value — like an extended test drive revealing durability and real-world performance.

AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

See more from StockTitan in Google Search and AI answers. Adds StockTitan as a preferred source · opens Google
Add on Google

Repeat dose of fasedienol demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability similar to single dose

Efficacy signals were observed across primary and secondary endpoints in repeat dose and single dose

Prespecified analysis of patients with very severe social anxiety disorder demonstrated nominally statistically significant improvement

Efficacy signals and responder analyses provide additional supportive evidence for discussion with the FDA regarding fasedienol registrational pathway

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., Aug. 06, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Vistagen (Nasdaq: VTGN), a late clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company pioneering neuroscience with nose-to-brain neurocircuitry to develop and commercialize a new class of intranasal product candidates called pherines, today announced the topline results of its exploratory Phase 2 repeat dose study evaluating fasedienol nasal spray in adult subjects with social anxiety disorder. The three-arm, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical study (N=61), which included an open label extension, was designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of two 3.2 µg doses of fasedienol administered ten minutes apart compared with a single 3.2 µg dose and placebo, for the acute treatment of anxiety induced by a public speaking challenge. The study was not designed to demonstrate statistically significant differences between treatment groups.

The exploratory study met its safety objective, demonstrating that a second dose administered within ten minutes of the first dose produced safety and tolerability data comparable to single-dose administration, with no new safety findings and overall safety findings consistent with previous clinical studies. In addition, both active treatment arms in the primary endpoint analysis, LS mean change in subjective units of distress (SUDS) score from Visit 2 (baseline speech, V2) to Visit 3 (randomized speech, V3), showed numerical separation from placebo, although the differences between treatment groups and placebo were not statistically significant (p=0.2)1.

Primary Endpoint

The primary efficacy results showed numerical separation from placebo in mean SUDS change from V2 to V3:

  • Pooled fasedienol (N=40): -15.0, p=0.10(Cohen’s d effect size=0.46)
  • Repeat dose fasedienol (N=19): -15.4, p=0.17(Cohen’s d=0.44)
  • Single dose fasedienol (N=21): -14.7, p=0.14, (Cohen’s d=0.47)
  • Placebo (N=21): -6.8.

In the prespecified analysis of patients with very severe social anxiety disorder as defined by a baseline Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) score of ≥ 95, fasedienol showed nominally2 statistically significant responses for the single dose arm compared with placebo and as pooled:

  • Pooled fasedienol (N=24): -16.2, p=0.04 (Cohen’s d=0.78)
  • Repeat dose fasedienol (N=10): -17.5, p=0.08 (Cohen’s d=0.74)
  • Single dose fasedienol (N=14): -15.3, p=0.05 (Cohen’s d=0.80)
  • Placebo (N=13): -1.6

The treatment effect for repeat dose fasedienol was numerically larger, although the smaller sample size and variability resulted in a higher p-value. The findings in the very severe group of patients defined by LSAS ≥95 are consistent with results previously observed in the randomized portion of the Company’s PALISADE-4 Phase 3 trial for the acute treatment of social anxiety disorder, where in a post-hoc analysis of patients with very severe social anxiety defined by LSAS ≥95, fasedienol also demonstrated a nominally statistically significant improvement compared with placebo (p=0.036).  

Secondary Endpoints

Responder rates for the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) secondary endpoints were directionally higher for fasedienol than placebo, providing consistency across primary and secondary endpoints for the total population in the study. In addition, the fasedienol responder rates in the repeat dose arm were more than twice those observed with placebo.

  • CGI-I responder rates: 40% for pooled fasedienol (n=40), 47% for repeat dose fasedienol (n=19),
    33% for single dose fasedienol (n=21), and 19% for placebo (n=21)
  • PGI-C responder rates: 33% for pooled fasedienol (n=40), 42% for repeat dose fasedienol (n=19), 29% for single dose fasedienol (n=21), and 19% for placebo (n=21)

Responder rates were also directionally higher for fasedienol compared with placebo for the very severe social anxiety disorder subpopulation, with repeat dose rates at four times or more than those observed with placebo.

  • CGI-I responder rates: 40% for pooled fasedienol (n=24), 60% for repeat dose fasedienol (n=10), 29% for single dose fasedienol (n=14), and 15% for placebo (n=13)
  • PGIC responder rates: 33% for pooled fasedienol (n=24), 50% for repeat dose fasedienol (n=10), 29% for single dose fasedienol (n=14), and 8% for placebo (n=13)

Exploratory Endpoint

A prespecified exploratory analysis in V2 to V3 change of anticipatory anxiety prior to the beginning of the public speaking challenge showed a larger decrease in mean SUDS score for fasedienol compared with placebo, with the repeat dose and pooled fasedienol showing nominal statistical significance (where anticipatory anxiety is the average of SUDS measures taken 3 minutes and 4 minutes prior to the start of the speech):

  • Pooled fasedienol (N=40): -13.8, p=0.03 (Cohen’s d=0.61)
  • Repeat dose fasedienol (N=19): -19.3, p=0.01 (Cohen’s d=0.83)
  • Single dose fasedienol (N=21): -8.7, p=0.2 (Cohen’s d=0.40)
  • Placebo (N=21): -0.9

"We are encouraged by the directionally favorable efficacy signals observed in this FDA-informed study,” said Dr. Angel Angelov, Chief Medical Officer of Vistagen. “Although not designed to show statistical significance, the study showed consistent findings across multiple efficacy measures and contributes to our growing understanding of how patients may benefit from fasedienol, including its repeat dose use. As observed in the post-hoc analyses from our PALISADE-4 Phase 3 trial, the pronounced separation from placebo within the very severe social anxiety disorder subpopulation reflects an enhanced fasedienol signal and minimized placebo change in very severe social anxiety disorder patients. Together with the broad body of clinical evidence from Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies, these results will help inform our discussions with the FDA regarding a potential registrational pathway for fasedienol.”

About Social Anxiety Disorder
Social anxiety disorder is a highly prevalent, serious, and sometimes life-threatening psychiatric mental health disorder affecting over 30 million adults in the U.S. While often experienced on a long-term basis, social anxiety disorder can manifest acutely when triggered by anxiety-provoking social and performance situations in daily life, causing anxiety, distress, and the fear of embarrassment, judgment, and humiliation. Social anxiety disorder can also significantly disrupt social life and hinder occupational functioning, as well as increase the risk of depression and substance use disorders, suicidal ideation, and suicide.

About Fasedienol
Fasedienol, Vistagen’s most advanced neurocircuitry-focused investigational pherine product candidate, is in U.S. Phase 3 clinical development for social anxiety disorder. Fasedienol's proposed mechanism of action (MOA) is fundamentally differentiated from all FDA-approved anti-anxiety medications. When administered intranasally in microgram-level doses, neurocircuitry-focused fasedienol modulates the nasal-limbic amygdala fear and anxiety neurocircuits involved in the pathophysiology of social anxiety disorder. Fasedienol is pharmacologically active without requiring apparent systemic absorption or uptake into the brain to achieve its rapid-onset anxiolytic effects. Fasedienol also has no observed binding on certain cellular receptors isolated from the brain that are associated with known drug abuse liability potential (for example, dopamine and opiate receptors) when activated by certain other pharmaceutical compounds for psychiatric disorders. Unlike benzodiazepines, fasedienol has no observed potentiation of GABA-A receptors. Because of its innovative no-systemic neurocircuitry-focused proposed MOA, Vistagen believes fasedienol has the potential to achieve rapid-onset anxiolytic effects for individuals with social anxiety disorder with a significantly reduced risk of unwanted side effects and safety concerns, such as potential drug-drug interactions, abuse, misuse, and addiction, associated with certain current oral and other systemically absorbed neuropsychiatric pharmaceuticals that act directly on neurons in the brain and are sometimes prescribed off-label for the treatment of social anxiety disorder.

About Vistagen
Vistagen (Nasdaq: VTGN) is a late clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company leveraging a deep understanding of nose-to-brain neurocircuitry to develop and commercialize a new class of rapid-onset neurocircuitry-focused intranasal product candidates called pherines. Vistagen’s pherine product candidates are designed to achieve therapeutic benefits without requiring absorption into the blood or uptake into the brain, giving them the potential to be a safer alternative to other pharmacological options, if successfully developed and approved. Vistagen’s most advanced intranasal pherine product candidates are fasedienol for the acute treatment of social anxiety disorder, itruvone for treatment of major depressive disorder, and refisolone for treatment of vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes) due to menopause. Connect at www.Vistagen.com.

Forward-looking Statements
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including, without limitation, statements regarding topline efficacy signals observed in the repeat dose study across prespecified analyses, which remain subject to change upon completion of a full analysis and audit of the complete data set from the study, the significance of such signals to the overall body of clinical evidence supporting fasedienol’s therapeutic potential, and Vistagen’s plans for upcoming discussions with the FDA regarding the potential registrational pathway for fasedienol. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “project,” “outlook,” “strategy,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “strive,” “goal,” “continue,” “likely,” “will,” “would” and variations of these terms and similar expressions, or the negative of these terms or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Vistagen and its management, are inherently uncertain. As with all pharmaceutical products, there are substantial risks and uncertainties in the process of development and commercialization, and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected or implied in these forward-looking statements. There can be no guarantee that any of Vistagen’s product candidates, including fasedienol, will successfully complete any future clinical trials, receive regulatory approval or be commercially successful. Because the repeat dose study was not powered to demonstrate statistical significance, there can be no assurance that the numerical trends and nominally significant findings described in this press release will be replicated in future, adequately powered clinical trials, or that the FDA will view such findings as supportive of a registrational pathway for fasedienol. Other factors that may cause such a difference include, without limitation, risks and uncertainties relating to Vistagen’s ability to successfully employ cash preservation measures and/or secure adequate financing for its operations, including financing or collaborative support for continued clinical development of its product candidates; submission of a NDA to the FDA for any of Vistagen's product candidates, including fasedienol; and the ability of any clinical trial information submitted by Vistagen to the FDA to successfully support an NDA. These risks and others are more fully discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Vistagen’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2026, as well as discussions of potential risks, uncertainties, and other important factors in our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Vistagen’s SEC filings are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this press release and should not be relied upon as representing Vistagen’s views as of any subsequent date. Vistagen explicitly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements other than as may be required by law. If Vistagen does update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be made that Vistagen will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.

Investor Inquiries: 
IR@vistagen.com

Media Inquiries: 
media@vistagen.com


Footnotes

  1. Based on the prespecified ANCOVA model from the statistical analysis plan. All other p-values were calculated using two-sided t-tests.
  2. The study did not achieve statistical significance on the planned primary endpoint, therefore all subsequent analyses showing significance are classified as nominally statistically significant.

FAQ

What did Vistagen (VTGN) report in the August 6, 2026 topline Phase 2 study of fasedienol for social anxiety disorder?

Vistagen reported that repeat and single doses of fasedienol showed favorable safety and numerical efficacy signals versus placebo. According to Vistagen, the exploratory Phase 2 study met its safety objective and produced consistent trends across primary, secondary, and exploratory endpoints, including subgroups with very severe social anxiety.

Were the primary efficacy results for fasedienol statistically significant in Vistagen’s Phase 2 social anxiety study (VTGN)?

No, the overall primary efficacy comparison versus placebo was not statistically significant. According to Vistagen, pooled fasedienol reduced mean SUDS by 15.0 versus 6.8 for placebo, but group differences had p=0.2, and the study was not designed to demonstrate statistically significant differences between treatment arms.

How did fasedienol perform in patients with very severe social anxiety disorder (LSAS ≥95) in Vistagen’s VTGN trial?

In the very severe subgroup, pooled and single-dose fasedienol showed nominally statistically significant SUDS improvements versus placebo. According to Vistagen, pooled fasedienol changed SUDS by -16.2 and single dose by -15.3, compared with -1.6 for placebo, with p-values of 0.04 and 0.05, respectively.

What were the CGI-I and PGI-C responder rates for fasedienol versus placebo in the Vistagen (VTGN) Phase 2 study?

Responder rates were higher for fasedienol than placebo on both scales. According to Vistagen, repeat-dose CGI-I responders were 47% vs 19% for placebo, and PGI-C responders were 42% vs 19%, with even larger responder rate differences in the very severe social anxiety subgroup.

Did repeat dosing of fasedienol show any new safety concerns in Vistagen’s August 2026 study (VTGN)?

No new safety concerns were observed with repeat dosing. According to Vistagen, a second 3.2 µg dose given ten minutes after the first had safety and tolerability comparable to single dosing, consistent with previous clinical studies of fasedienol in social anxiety disorder.

How did fasedienol affect anticipatory anxiety before public speaking in Vistagen’s Phase 2 VTGN trial?

Fasedienol reduced anticipatory anxiety more than placebo in a prespecified exploratory analysis. According to Vistagen, repeat-dose fasedienol showed a mean SUDS change of -19.3 versus -0.9 for placebo, with pooled fasedienol at -13.8, achieving nominal statistical significance (p=0.01 and p=0.03).

How will these Phase 2 results influence Vistagen’s regulatory plans for fasedienol (VTGN)?

Vistagen plans to use these data to inform FDA discussions about a potential registrational pathway. According to Vistagen, the repeat-dose study, together with prior Phase 2 and Phase 3 results, contributes to the overall clinical evidence base supporting fasedienol for acute treatment of social anxiety disorder.