ATS Corporation 2026 shareholder vote results

ATS Corporation held its annual meeting of shareholders on August 6, 2026.

Accepted by SEC EDGAR 08/07/2026 - 12:27 PM EDT Learn about SEC filing dates

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

ATS Corporation held its annual meeting of shareholders on August 6, 2026. Shareholders elected all nominated directors, including Avik Dey, Joanne S. Ferstman, Kirsten Lange, Michael E. Martino, Sharon C. Pel, Daniel A. Pryor, Philip B. Whitehead and William Douglas (Doug) Wright, to serve until the next annual meeting or until successors are elected or appointed.

Shareholders re-appointed Ernst & Young LLP as auditor with 83,511,395 votes For and 2,953,775 Withheld. A non-binding resolution supporting the company’s approach to executive compensation passed with 81,808,141 For and 3,763,320 Against. A shareholder proposal to amend By-Law No.1 was defeated, receiving 497,513 For and 85,073,949 Against.

Key Figures

Auditor re-appointment For votes: 83,511,395 Executive compensation For votes: 81,808,141 By-law amendment Against votes: 85,073,949 +1 more

4 metrics

Auditor re-appointment For votes 83,511,395 Votes For re-appointing Ernst & Young LLP as auditor

Executive compensation For votes 81,808,141 Votes For non-binding resolution on executive compensation

By-law amendment Against votes 85,073,949 Votes Against shareholder proposal to amend By-Law No.1

Votes For Wright as director 85,553,345 Votes For election of William Douglas (Doug) Wright as director

Key Terms

non-binding resolution, executive compensation, By-Law No.1, National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations

4 terms

non-binding resolution regulatory

"The passing of a non-binding resolution accepting the Corporation’s approach"

A non-binding resolution is a formal vote or statement expressing the board’s or shareholders’ opinion or recommendation without creating a legal obligation to act. It matters to investors because it signals management or shareholder intent and can change expectations, influence market sentiment, and often precede concrete, binding actions—like a committee’s public suggestion that guides future decisions but doesn’t force them.

executive compensation financial

"A non-binding resolution accepting the Corporation’s approach to executive compensation"

Payments and benefits given to a company's top leaders — including base salary, cash bonuses, stock awards, options and retirement or perquisites — designed to compensate and motivate them. Investors care because these packages affect a company’s costs, influence executives’ decisions and signal how well management’s interests line up with shareholders’; like a captain’s contract, the structure of pay can encourage safe navigation toward long-term gains or risky short-term moves that hurt returns.

By-Law No.1 regulatory

"The shareholder proposal to amend By-Law No.1 of the Corporation"

A company's By-law No. 1 is the primary internal rulebook that sets how the corporation is governed—covering things like how directors are elected, how meetings are run, officers' responsibilities, voting procedures, and how the by-laws can be changed. Think of it as the operating manual for corporate governance; it matters to investors because these rules shape decision-making, shareholder rights, corporate control and the mechanics of major actions such as board changes or mergers.

National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations regulatory

"REPORT OF VOTING RESULTS National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations"

A Canadian securities regulation that requires publicly traded companies to keep the market informed by regularly filing financial reports and promptly announcing any important developments that could affect their share price. It’s like a rule that makes firms send both scheduled progress reports and immediate alerts about major news so investors can make timely decisions based on the same information. Complying with these obligations helps maintain fair, transparent markets and reduces surprises for investors.

FAQ

AI-generated questions and answers. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

What did ATS (ATS) shareholders vote on at the August 6, 2026 annual meeting?

ATS shareholders approved director elections, re-appointed Ernst & Young LLP as auditor, passed a non-binding resolution on executive compensation, and voted on a shareholder proposal to amend By-Law No.1, which was not approved.

Were all ATS (ATS) director nominees elected at the 2026 shareholder meeting?

Yes. All ATS director nominees, including Avik Dey, Joanne S. Ferstman and William Douglas (Doug) Wright, were elected to serve until the next annual meeting or until their successors are elected or appointed in accordance with the corporation’s articles and by-laws.

Did ATS (ATS) shareholders approve the re-appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as auditor?

Yes. Shareholders re-appointed Ernst & Young LLP as auditor, with 83,511,395 votes For and 2,953,775 Withheld. The resolution also authorized the Board of Directors to fix the auditor’s remuneration for the coming year.

How did ATS (ATS) shareholders vote on executive compensation at the 2026 meeting?

Shareholders approved the non-binding resolution supporting ATS’s approach to executive compensation, with 81,808,141 votes For and 3,763,320 Against. This vote expresses shareholder views on pay practices but does not legally bind the board.

What was the outcome of the ATS (ATS) shareholder proposal to amend By-Law No.1?

The shareholder proposal to amend By-Law No.1 was not approved. It received 497,513 votes For and 85,073,949 Against, so the existing by-law provisions remain unchanged following the 2026 annual meeting.

AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

Form 6-K: How Foreign Companies Report to the SEC →

See more from StockTitan in Google Search and AI answers. Adds StockTitan as a preferred source · opens Google

Add on Google Not now

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of August 2026

Commission File Number: 001-41713

ATS CORPORATION

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

730 Fountain Street North

Building 3

Cambridge, Ontario N3H 4R7

(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F☐     Form 40-F☒

EXHIBIT INDEX

99.1 Report of voting results- August 06 2026, AGM

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ATS CORPORATION (Registrant)

Date: August 07, 2026

By:

/s/ Gordon Raman

Name: Gordon Raman

Title: Chief Legal Officer

ATS CORPORATION

(the “Corporation”)

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Held on August 6, 2026

REPORT OF VOTING RESULTS

National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations – Section 11.3

Matters Voted Upon

Business									Outcome of Vote
1.The election of the following nominees as directors of the Corporation to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are duly elected or appointed in accordance with the articles and by-laws of the Corporation:									Approved (1)
Avik Dey Joanne S. Ferstman Kirsten Lange Michael E. Martino			Sharon C. Pel Daniel A. Pryor Philip B. Whitehead William Douglas (Doug) Wright
2.The re-appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors of the Corporation until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until a successor is appointed, and the authorization of the Board of Directors to fix the auditor’s remuneration.									Approved (2)
3.The passing of a non-binding resolution accepting the Corporation’s approach to executive compensation.									Approved (3)
4.The shareholder proposal to amend By-Law No.1 of the Corporation.									Not Approved (4)

______

Notes:

(1)This matter was voted upon electronically and by proxy at the virtual meeting. The following were voted For or Withheld: (a) Avik Dey, 85,014,959For; 556,503Withheld; (b) Joanne S. Ferstman, 84,619,009For; 952,453Withheld; (c) Kirsten Lange, 83,844,384For; 1,727,078 Withheld; (d) Michael E. Martino, 79,715,346For; 5,855,967Withheld; (e) Sharon C. Pel, 84,804,912For; 766,550Withheld; (f) Daniel A. Pryor, 85,030,863For; 540,449 Withheld; and (g) Philip B. Whitehead, 84,992,185 For; 579,127Withheld; (h) William Douglas (Doug)Wright, 85,553,345 For; 17,967Withheld

(2)This matter was voted upon electronically and by proxy at the virtual meeting. Of the votes received, 83,511,395were voted For and 2,953,775 were Withheld.

(3)This matter was voted upon electronically and by proxy at the virtual meeting. Of the votes received, 81,808,141were voted For and 3,763,320 were voted Against.

(4)This matter was voted upon electronically and by proxy at the virtual meeting. Of the votes received, 497,513 were voted For and 85,073,949 were voted Against.

1

Filing Exhibits & Attachments

1 document

Press Releases

• EX-99.1 EX-99.1 13.2 KB