[Form 4] Cognizant Technology Solutions Insider Trading Activity
John M. Dineen, a director of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (CTSH), received restricted stock units (RSUs) on 08/26/2025. The filing shows three RSU grants credited as dividend equivalents: 86.3357 RSUs resulting in 20,049.3991 underlying shares, 30.5079 RSUs resulting in 7,084.7458 underlying shares, and 12.3818 RSUs resulting in 2,875.3818 underlying shares. The filing states each RSU represents a right to one share of Class A common stock.
Some RSUs are fully vested and the reporting person has elected to defer settlement under the company’s Non-Employee Director Compensation Guidelines; one RSU tranche will vest fully on June 3, 2026. The form was signed on behalf of Mr. Dineen by Kelli Arman on 08/28/2025.
- Director alignment: RSUs and deferral elections align director incentives with long-term shareholder value
 - Transparency: Filing discloses exact RSU amounts and vesting/deferral terms, aiding investor visibility
 
- None.
 
Insights
TL;DR Director received RSUs, mostly vested, with deferral elections—no sales or purchases of underlying shares reported.
The Form 4 discloses dividend-equivalent RSUs credited to an independent director, increasing his beneficial ownership in share-equivalent units. Because the grants are RSUs rather than open-market purchases or sales, they do not represent an immediate change in outstanding common stock. The deferral elections indicate alignment with long-term shareholder outcomes rather than immediate monetization. Impact to equity float or near-term liquidity is immaterial based on this filing alone.
TL;DR Director compensation was credited as RSUs with standard deferral provisions, consistent with governance norms.
The disclosure shows compensation delivered via vested and contingent RSUs, and the director used the company’s Non-Employee Director Compensation Guidelines to defer settlement. Vesting and deferral terms—full vesting for some units and a June 3, 2026 vest date for another tranche—are explicitly stated. These practices align with typical governance approaches to tie director pay to long-term equity outcomes and do not signal governance concerns in isolation.