CVCO Form 4: Chief Accounting Officer Disposes of 300 Shares
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Paul Bigbee, Chief Accounting Officer of Cavco Industries, reported a sale of 300 shares of Cavco common stock on 08/29/2025 at a reported price of $530.45 per share. After the transaction he is shown as beneficially owning 774 shares directly. The filing also notes 461 restricted stock units allocated but not yet vested or delivered. The Form 4 was filed as a single reporting person submission and bears a signature filed by an attorney-in-fact on 09/02/2025. The report documents an insider disposition and the remaining direct holdings and unvested awards held by the reporting person.
Positive
- Timely, compliant disclosure of an insider transaction on Form 4
- Remaining direct ownership of 774 shares is explicitly reported
- Allocated but unvested RSUs (461) are disclosed, clarifying vested vs unvested holdings
Negative
- Insider sale of 300 shares was reported, representing a disposition by a company officer
Insights
TL;DR: Insider sold a small number of shares; filing shows remaining direct holdings and unvested RSUs, implying routine liquidity rather than a major change.
The sale of 300 shares at $530.45 is a discrete, identifiable insider disposition. With 774 shares remaining directly held and 461 RSUs unvested, the transaction size appears modest relative to typical executive holdings in mid-cap issuers. The filing is complete: it lists relationship (Chief Accounting Officer), transaction code (S for sale), and post-transaction beneficial ownership. For investors monitoring insider activity, this is a documented sale but not, on its face, a material ownership shift.
TL;DR: Form 4 properly discloses an officer sale and remaining unvested awards; no governance red flags are evident from this single filing.
The Form 4 identifies Paul Bigbee as Chief Accounting Officer and reports an 08/29/2025 sale. The presence of 461 allocated but unvested RSUs is explicitly disclosed in the explanation. The filing was executed by an attorney-in-fact and includes the necessary reporting fields. From a governance perspective, this looks like compliant reporting of a routine insider transaction; there is no indication of unusual timing or concentrations based solely on the provided data.