STOCK TITAN

Cerberus JV backs Eos Energy (EOSE) with $100M, $150M rights raise

Filing Impact
(High)
Filing Sentiment
(Neutral)
Form Type
SCHEDULE 13D/A

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Cerberus-affiliated investors updated their ownership and plans in Eos Energy Enterprises. The group led by CCM Denali Equity reports beneficial ownership of 159,587,654 shares of common stock, representing about 31.1% of the company, based on 353,142,655 shares outstanding as of July 1, 2026.

The amendment describes an amended and restated binding term sheet for a new joint venture with Eos and an affiliate of Hudson Bay Capital. At closing, a Cerberus affiliate is expected to contribute $100 million for Class A-2 units, while Hudson Bay contributes $50 million for Class C units, alongside a targeted $150 million rights offering by Eos to existing stockholders to fund Class B units.

Cerberus and Hudson Bay are also expected to receive long-dated warrants to buy 20,017,772 and 10,008,886 Eos shares, respectively, at an exercise price of $5.481 per share, plus an exchange right allowing Hudson Bay’s JV units to be swapped into Eos shares at set price levels or the final rights offering price.

Positive

  • None.

Negative

  • None.

Insights

Large strategic JV plus multi-layer equity raises and options reshape Eos’s capital stack.

The filing shows Cerberus-linked entities holding about 31.1% of Eos Energy, including common shares and preferred stock that can convert into common. That stake is anchored to 353,142,655 shares outstanding as of July 1, 2026, giving Cerberus meaningful influence.

The joint venture term sheet contemplates $100 million from a Cerberus affiliate, $50 million from Hudson Bay, and a targeted $150 million rights offering. In parallel, Eos expects to issue warrants for 20,017,772 shares to Cerberus and 10,008,886 shares to Hudson Bay at an exercise price of $5.481, plus an exchange right that lets Hudson Bay convert JV units into Eos shares at specified share prices and, later, the rights-offering price.

Governance of the JV company is structured with a seven-member board, initially four managers appointed by the Cerberus affiliate and up to three by Eos, with certain reserved matters needing Issuer consent. Preferred unit transfers are restricted for three years except to affiliates, which stabilizes the JV’s ownership in the near term. Overall, this is a complex but neutral restructuring of risk and upside among Eos, Cerberus and Hudson Bay, with actual impact depending on execution and future take-up of the rights offering and warrants.

See more from StockTitan in Google Search and AI answers. Adds StockTitan as a preferred source · opens Google
Add on Google
Learn about SEC filing dates





29415C101

(CUSIP Number)
Alexander D. Benjamin
875 Third Avenue, 11th Floor,
New York, NY, 10022
(212) 891-2100

(Name, Address and Telephone Number of Person Authorized to Receive Notices and Communications)
06/30/2026

(Date of Event Which Requires Filing of This Statement)


If the filing person has previously filed a statement on Schedule 13G to report the acquisition that is the subject of this Schedule 13D, and is filing this schedule because of §§ 240.13d-1(e), 240.13d-1(f) or 240.13d-1(g), check the following box.

The information required on the remainder of this cover page shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Act") or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section of the Act but shall be subject to all other provisions of the Act (however, see the Notes).




schemaVersion:


SCHEDULE 13D






SCHEDULE 13D






SCHEDULE 13D






SCHEDULE 13D


Cerberus Capital Management II, L.P.
Signature:/s/ Alexander D. Benjamin
Name/Title:Alexander D. Benjamin/Senior Managing Director and Chief Legal Officer
Date:07/02/2026
CCM Denali Equity Holdings, LP
Signature:/s/ Alexander D. Benjamin
Name/Title:Alexander D. Benjamin/Manager, CCM Denali Equity Holdings GP, LLC, its general partner
Date:07/02/2026
CCM Denali Equity Holdings GP, LLC
Signature:/s/ Alexander D. Benjamin
Name/Title:Alexander D. Benjamin/Manager
Date:07/02/2026

FAQ

How much of Eos Energy (EOSE) do the Cerberus reporting persons beneficially own?

The Cerberus-affiliated reporting persons beneficially own 159,587,654 Eos Energy common shares. This represents approximately 31.1% of the company, based on 353,142,655 shares outstanding as of July 1, 2026, as cited in an Eos prospectus.

What joint venture is Eos Energy (EOSE) planning with Cerberus and Hudson Bay?

Eos plans a joint venture with CCM Frontier, an affiliate of Cerberus, and Hudson Bay through Frontier Power USA Parent, LLC. The JV will receive $100 million from a Cerberus affiliate and $50 million from Hudson Bay, focused on a frontier power platform developed by Cerberus affiliates.

What is the size and structure of the Eos Energy (EOSE) rights offering?

Eos targets a $150 million rights offering to existing stockholders and certain warrant holders. Each unit includes one common share and 0.4388 of a warrant, at a subscription price of $5.481 per unit, with basic and over-subscription rights described in the filing.

What warrants will Cerberus and Hudson Bay receive from Eos Energy (EOSE)?

A Cerberus affiliate is expected to receive Additional CCM Warrants for 20,017,772 Eos shares, and Hudson Bay will receive a warrant for 10,008,886 shares. Both have an exercise price of $5.481 per share, 10-year terms, and can be exercised for cash or on a cashless basis.

How can Hudson Bay’s JV Class C Units convert into Eos Energy (EOSE) stock?

Hudson Bay’s Class C Units are exchangeable into Eos common shares. Before December 31, 2026, portions can convert at share prices of $15.00, $17.50 or $20.00. After that date, exchanges use the final rights offering price, with customary anti-dilution adjustments.

What governance structure will the Eos Energy (EOSE) joint venture have?

The JV company will be managed by a seven-member board of managers. Four managers will be appointed by the Cerberus affiliate CCM Frontier and up to three by Eos, with certain reserved matters requiring Issuer-related consent while Eos maintains specified ownership thresholds.