Hills Bancorporation (HBIA) selects Crowe LLP as new auditor for 2026
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Hills Bancorporation reported that its Audit Committee has decided to change independent auditors following completion of the 2025 audit. Forvis Mazars, LLP will be dismissed as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm after it finishes auditing the consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2025. On January 5, 2026, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of Crowe LLP to audit the company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026, subject to Crowe’s standard client acceptance procedures and an engagement letter.
The company noted that Forvis Mazars’ audit reports for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 contained no adverse opinions, disclaimers, or qualifications. It also stated there were no disagreements with Forvis Mazars on accounting, disclosure, or audit scope matters during those periods or the subsequent interim period. Previously disclosed material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting related to period-end review controls, manual journal entry processes, and related party transaction controls were identified as reportable events and discussed with Forvis Mazars, and the firm has been authorized to respond fully to Crowe about these matters.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
Hills Bancorporation is transitioning audit firms with no reported disputes, while still addressing earlier internal control weaknesses.
The company’s Audit Committee ran a competitive process involving six national accounting firms and decided to replace Forvis Mazars, LLP after completion of the 2025 audit with Crowe LLP for the 2026 fiscal year. This structured selection process and the overlap period help support continuity of external audit coverage while shifting to a new firm.
The filing states Forvis Mazars’ opinions on the 2023 and 2024 financial statements were clean, with no adverse opinions, disclaimers, or qualifications. It also notes there were no disagreements on accounting, disclosure, or audit scope, which suggests the change is not being attributed to overt disputes over financial reporting.
The company does highlight previously disclosed material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, including period-end review controls, manual journal entry processes, and related party transaction approval and disclosure. These matters were classified as reportable events, discussed with Forvis Mazars, and Forvis Mazars has been authorized to communicate fully with Crowe. Future company reports covering the year ended 2025 and beyond will show how these internal control issues are remediated under the oversight of the new auditor.
FAQ
What auditor change did Hills Bancorporation (HBIA) disclose?
Hills Bancorporation disclosed that its Audit Committee will dismiss Forvis Mazars, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm after completion of the audit for the year ending December 31, 2025, and has approved the engagement of Crowe LLP to audit the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026, subject to Crowe’s standard acceptance procedures and an engagement letter.
Were there any disagreements between Hills Bancorporation and Forvis Mazars, LLP?
The company stated that during its two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, and the subsequent interim period through the date of the report, there were no disagreements with Forvis Mazars, LLP on accounting principles, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure as defined in Regulation S-K Item 304(a)(1)(iv).
How did Forvis Mazars, LLP opine on Hills Bancorporation’s recent financial statements?
The reports of Forvis Mazars, LLP on Hills Bancorporation’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.
What internal control weaknesses did Hills Bancorporation identify in this disclosure?
The company referred to previously disclosed material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting relating to: management review and activity-level controls over period-end financial reporting (including validation of the correct version to be filed and auditor review completion), segregation of duties and approval of manual journal entries, and the identification, prior approval, and disclosure of related party transactions, as described in prior annual and quarterly reports.
Did Hills Bancorporation consult Crowe LLP on accounting issues before appointing it as auditor?
The company stated that during its two most recently completed fiscal years and through the date of Crowe’s appointment, it did not consult with Crowe LLP on the application of accounting principles to specific transactions, the type of audit opinion that might be issued, or any matters that would have been disagreements or reportable events under Regulation S-K Item 304.
How is Forvis Mazars, LLP involved in Hills Bancorporation’s communication with Crowe LLP?
Hills Bancorporation noted that the reportable events regarding internal control weaknesses were discussed between the Audit Committee and Forvis Mazars, LLP, and that Forvis Mazars has been authorized to respond fully to inquiries by Crowe LLP concerning these matters. Forvis Mazars was also asked to provide a letter to the SEC stating its agreement or disagreement with the company’s statements.