The following is a transcript of an interview with Michael Hurlston, Chief Executive Officer of Lumentum, on
November 6, 2026.
Transcript of Michael Hurlston on CNBC Power Lunch
Kelly Evans: Meanwhile, Lumentum is caught in a sharp repricing of the AI buildout. The shares are down nearly 40% this week. Tough – one of the
worst performers in the S&P, as election-driven concerns about data center construction collide with Marvell’s all-stock acquisition offer. CEO Michael Hurlston joins us to address the sell-off, the deal, and the outlook for the business.
Michael, we have checked in with you at various points throughout
a very tumultuous year. First of all, I haven’t spoken with you since the deal was first announced, so there’s that, just, shock factor to still absorb. This is one of Marvell’s biggest acquisitions ever. You guys were clearly
sitting in the catbird seat. Then all this gets announced, the share reaction on that day is a little wobbly, and now this quasi-implosion of the AI trade. I’d love to know your thoughts about it.
Michael Hurlston: Look, Kelly, it’s great to speak to you, as always. I always enjoy our interactions, and this is a tougher one. So,
we’ve – in the middle of announcing this deal with Marvell, which we’re still super happy about, I think the long-term outlook for the combined companies is excellent – the timing was bad. So we’re in the worst sell-off we’ve seen in recent memory around the AI trade, as you’ve been reporting all over and over again. One thing I would say, and you had a comment up from the CEO of IREN, I would second that:
there’s a massive disconnect between what we’re seeing in our demand book and what the markets are showing. Our demand couldn’t be stronger, and yet we are seeing this massive, massive
sell-off.
Kelly Evans: Right, and the deal is an all-stock
deal, which makes this extra tricky. If it were a cash deal, or somehow debt financed, you wouldn’t necessarily be in this downward spiral. But four and a half shares is what the deal involves, is what your shareholders will receive in turn
for every one Lumentum share. And Marvell, has been sliding. So you’re still trading at somewhat of a discount, this could be a complex deal to close because of regulatory holdups in China and elsewhere, it could take 12 to 18 months, but are
you still confident that Marvell is the right buyer for the company? I hate to ask it quite this way, but does the reaction in the markets give you pause at all about that?
Michael Hurlston: Look, we’re obviously not happy about the reaction, but I’d say a couple of things in reaction to your question.
First, we really like Marvell. We think they’ve got a lot of upside from where they are, and that’s part of the reason we took all stock. If we had said we weren’t confident in their numbers and their outlook – and obviously
as part of the diligence process, we got to look at their books and understood their design wins – it’s impressive. I think they’re on an excellent trajectory, and our board of directors never considered anything but taking all
stock. We recognize there are going to be challenges in regulatory, to the second part of your question. It’s going to be a bumpy one, but we’re also optimistic we get through. We’ve had a track record between myself – I sold
a company previously in a very tough regulatory environment, and we got that one through – and Matt Murphy, the CEO of Marvell, has had a great track record getting things done well ahead of predicted timelines. So, we think we’re going
to get it through. It’s going to be the biggest challenge, I think, from here to there.
Kelly Evans: Yeah, and there are big breakup
fees on either side. I think theirs is almost $6 billion if they walk away, and yours is almost $3 billion if you do. So, that sort of thing. So, it’s almost like you’re incentivizing each other, tying each other to the mast
here, to get this across the finish line. And you mentioned you got to look at their books and have a sense for their upside, and that’s why you wanted the structure of this deal. Four and a half shares, not a cash, not a sort of like a
steadier financing deal. Does the election results Tuesday, you think – and I understand what you’re saying, that you’re seeing strong business right now – does it risk, put at risk, the buildout? Your company, you guys make
– it’s like if you thought copper-fiber was impressive, Lumentum, light, you’re the next level, optical is the next level on top of that. This is all the technology that’s wanted for these data centers being constructed. Is
there any sense or risk that there might be a slowdown, that even the second derivative might be slowing down?
Michael Hurlston: Yeah, a
couple of things. First, our business is largely predicated on that shift you mentioned from electrical to optical, and that’s really the growth driver that sustains us and, to a large extent, Marvell through ‘27, ‘28, and
‘29. We’ve been very dependent and tied to the data center buildout up until this point, but as we look forward, we are less dependent on that than perhaps other companies. Yes, we definitely want data center builds to continue, but our
main growth driver is more about that shift from electrical to optical, and that can take place in existing data centers. So while we understand all the noise, and by the way we don’t see any issues, we might not see issues but certainly given
our place in the market we’d think that there’d be a slowdown on our backlog. We’re not seeing that. But again, our biggest driver is the shift from electrical to optical, and that seems to be going full steam ahead.
Dom Chu: Hey, Michael, it’s Dom. I wonder, in an environment like this, you’ve already done countless scenario analyses about this
deal and what it could mean. You have to do now countless more scenario analyses based on the outcome of the elections, anticipated timelines, hypothetical regulatory constraints. What is the conversation between you and, say, a Marvell together,
hypothetically you guys are coming together, what’s the conversation like between you and data center developers and operators, about what kind of timeline you are now dealing with? We know the money is going to be spent, but there were
assumptions about how quickly it would be spent, and now those assumptions are going out further in time. What’s that conversation like?
Michael
Hurlston: Yeah, Dom. Look, I think, as I said a second ago, the data center buildout is less a driver for our business and for Marvell’s. We’re much more predicated on the technology shift within it. That being said, of course,
we’re sitting here running scenarios, as I’m sure Marvell is, trying to look at how we recover some of the lost shareholder value. That’s super important to us. Both companies have done an incredible job over the last couple of
years building shareholder value, and our goal is to get that back as quickly as we can. I think our numbers were super strong. One of the things that got lost in this whole deal was the numbers that we reported. We showed nearly 20% sequential
growth on the quarter, incredible margin expansion in both gross margin and operating margin. And our expectation is that Marvell is going to have some good numbers to report in about a month, and hopefully that doesn’t get lost in the
backwash of the deal and the downturn we’ve seen in the markets in the last week.