STOCK TITAN

Oppenheimer (NYSE: OPY) targets $70M settlement in cash sweep class action

Filing Impact
(Moderate)
Filing Sentiment
(Neutral)
Form Type
8-K

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. announced that its main subsidiary has signed a binding Settlement Term Sheet to resolve a class-action "cash sweep" lawsuit for $70 million, subject to District Court approval. The payment would go into escrow ten business days after preliminary approval.

The case involves alleged issues with cash sweep programs from 2022 through final court approval and is one of about 25 similar cases against financial institutions. Plaintiffs had indicated they would seek damages in excess of $440 million, so the settlement substantially limits potential exposure.

The company will record a reserve for the full settlement in its first fiscal quarter of 2026, significantly affecting reported earnings for that period, even though the agreement was reached after quarter-end. Oppenheimer expects the settlement amount to be fully tax deductible and says the deal includes no admission of liability or wrongdoing.

Positive

  • None.

Negative

  • $70 million settlement charge will significantly depress Oppenheimer’s reported earnings for the first fiscal quarter of 2026, creating a notable one-time hit to profitability even though the cash payment is contingent on court approvals.

Insights

$70M settlement caps litigation risk but hits Q1 2026 earnings.

Oppenheimer Holdings agreed to a $70 million class-action settlement over its cash sweep program, compared with plaintiff assertions of potential damages above $440 million. Economically, this trades a large but known payout for removing the tail risk of a jury trial.

The binding Settlement Term Sheet still requires preliminary and final approval from the District Court, so timing and final terms depend on court decisions. The charge will be booked in the first fiscal quarter of 2026, significantly depressing that quarter’s earnings, though the company expects the amount to be fully tax deductible.

The dispute period runs from 2022 through final court approval. Future filings, including the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, should clarify how the settlement reserve affects capital, profitability and any related disclosures about the firm’s sweep program economics.

Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement Business
The company signed a significant contract such as a merger agreement, credit facility, or major partnership.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits Exhibits
Financial statements, pro forma financial information, and exhibit attachments filed with this report.
Settlement amount $70 million Payment to settle Liberty Capital Group cash sweep class action, subject to court approval
Asserted potential damages In excess of $440 million Amount plaintiffs were expected to seek in the class action
Number of related cases Approximately 25 cases Other cash sweep lawsuits filed against various financial institutions
Class certification date December 8, 2025 District Court granted class certification on breach of contract and ancillary claims
Earnings period impacted First fiscal quarter of 2026 Quarter in which the $70 million settlement reserve will be recorded
Trial timing before settlement June 2026 Jury trial had been scheduled to begin in June of the year of settlement
Settlement Term Sheet legal
"The terms of the agreement are set forth in a binding settlement term sheet"
class certification legal
"the District Court issued its decision granting class certification on plaintiff’s causes of action"
Class certification is a court decision that allows a lawsuit to proceed on behalf of a group of people with similar claims, rather than only the individual who filed the case. For investors, class certification matters because it can transform a single complaint into a large, consolidated legal action that increases potential financial liability, settlement pressure and reputational risk—similar to consolidating many small leaks into one big flood that the company must address.
cash sweep program financial
"cases filed against various financial institutions concerning their “cash sweep” programs"
FDIC regulatory
"cash was “swept” into a bank demand deposit account that provided insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation"
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is a U.S. government agency that protects individual and business bank deposits by insuring accounts up to a set limit, acting like a safety net for savers if a bank fails. It matters to investors because FDIC insurance reduces the chance of sudden losses for depositors, supports confidence in the banking system, and can influence the perceived risk and stock value of banks and financial firms.
escrow account financial
"The settlement amount would be paid into an escrow account ten business days after receiving preliminary approval"
An escrow account is a neutral holding account run by an independent third party where cash, shares, or documents are kept until specific contract conditions are met — like a referee holding the ball until both teams agree the play is fair. Investors care because escrows reduce counterparty risk in deals (mergers, stock purchases, property transactions), ensuring payments or assets are released only when agreed terms are satisfied.
0000791963false00007919632021-12-142021-12-14

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2026
___________________________________________________
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): April 24, 2026

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Commission File Number 1-12043
Delaware 98-0080034
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
85 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(212) 668-8000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2.):

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CRF 240.14a-12)
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading SymbolName of each exchange on which registered
Class A non-voting common StockOPYThe New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.






ITEM 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement

On April 24, 2026, Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. (“Oppenheimer”), the principal operating subsidiary of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (the “Company”), reached an agreement to settle the previously disclosed litigation styled Liberty Capital Group, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Oppenheimer Holdings Inc., Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., and Oppenheimer Asset Management Inc., No. 1:25-cv04822-JSR which was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in June of 2025 (the “ District Court”). Further information on the background of the case can be found in the Company’s press release dated today’s date which is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and in the Company’s previous filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The terms of the agreement are set forth in a binding settlement term sheet executed by representatives for plaintiffs and Oppenheimer (the “Settlement Term Sheet”). Pursuant to the Settlement Term Sheet, Oppenheimer has agreed to pay $70 million in full settlement of the claims asserted in the litigation. The settlement amount would be paid into an escrow account ten business days after receiving preliminary approval by the District Court of the settlement which the Company expects will take up to ninety days. The Settlement Term Sheet provides that the Company will receive a release from any and all claims arising from the facts and circumstances alleged in the litigation. The settlement remains subject to approval by the District Court. The parties have agreed to finalize formal settlement documentation and file a Stipulation of Settlement and motion for preliminary approval with the District Court within 60 days of execution of the Settlement Term Sheet. The settlement contemplates that the resolution of the matter would be without any admission of liability or wrongdoing by the Company.

The agreement is subject to the negotiation, execution, and delivery of a definitive settlement agreement and both preliminary and final approval by the District Court. There can be no assurance that definitive settlement documentation will be executed or that the District Court will approve the proposed settlement on its current or any other terms.If formal settlement documentation is finalized and District Court approval is obtained, the settlement would resolve all claims asserted against the Company in the litigation.

The foregoing description of the Settlement Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Settlement Agreement which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(d)Exhibits:

Exhibit NumberExhibit
10.1Settlement Term Sheet, dated April 24, 2026, by and among Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. and the plaintiff class in Liberty Capital Group v. Oppenheimer Holdings Inc., No. 1:25-cv-04822-JSR (S.D.N.Y.).
99.1Press release dated April 24, 2026


2





SIGNATURES

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.


Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.
Date: April 24, 2026

By: /s/ Robert S. Lowenthal
---------------------------------
Name: Robert S. Lowenthal
Title: Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer)


3




EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit NumberDescription
10.1
Settlement Term Sheet, dated April 24, 2026, by and among Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. and the plaintiff class in Liberty Capital Group v. Oppenheimer Holdings Inc., No. 1:25-cv-04822-JSR (S.D.N.Y.).
99.1
Press release dated April 24, 2026
4

Exhibit 99.1

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. Settles “Cash Sweep” Litigation

April 24, 2026. New York, NY. Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (“OPY”) today announced that its principal operating subsidiary, Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (“Oppenheimer”), reached an agreement to settle the previously disclosed litigation styled Liberty Capital Group, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Oppenheimer Holdings Inc., Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., and Oppenheimer Asset Management Inc., No. 1:25-cv04822-JSR which was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in June of 2025 (the “District Court”).

This case is one of approximately 25 cases filed against various financial institutions concerning their “cash sweep” programs pursuant to which idle customer cash was “swept” into a bank demand deposit account that provided insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), liquidity and access through check-writing.

On December 8, 2025, the District Court issued its decision granting class certification (the “Class”) on plaintiff’s causes of action for breach of contract and other ancillary claims. The case had been placed on an accelerated schedule and was set to begin trial in June of this year and would be decided by a jury. Oppenheimer was one of the last financial institutions to be sued on matters relating to its sweep program, but the first of these cases scheduled to go to trial.

Based on assertions made by the Plaintiff in discovery, the Company expected that the Plaintiff would seek damages in the class action in excess of $440 million. Given the lack of precedent in other cases and the inherent risks of a jury trial where the outcome could be worse than a negotiated settlement, the Company concluded that it was in the best interests of the Company, its employees, stockholders and other stakeholders to enter into an agreement to settle the claims.

The terms of the agreement are set forth in a binding term sheet (“Settlement Term Sheet”) executed by representatives for plaintiff and Oppenheimer. Pursuant to the agreement, Oppenheimer has agreed to pay $70 million in full settlement of the claims asserted in the litigation. The settlement amount would be paid into an escrow account ten business days after receiving preliminary approval by the District Court of the settlement which the Company expects will take up to ninety days. The Settlement Term Sheet provides that the Company will receive a release from any and all claims arising from the facts and circumstances alleged in the litigation. The settlement remains subject to approval by the District Court. The parties have agreed to finalize formal settlement documentation and file a Stipulation of Settlement and motion for preliminary approval with the District Court within 60 days of execution of the Settlement Term Sheet. The settlement contemplates that the resolution of the matter would be without any admission of liability or wrongdoing by the Company.

The period in dispute in the case began in 2022 and the settlement will cover the period up to when the final approval of the District Court is received. The Company believes that during the period under dispute the rates offered to its clients were competitive with those offered by its major competitors. The program was designed for the short-term deposit of client funds in a highly liquid FDIC insured account.

The agreement is subject to the negotiation, execution, and delivery of a definitive settlement agreement and both preliminary and final approval by the District Court. There can be no assurance that a definitive
1


settlement agreement will be executed or that the District Court will approve the proposed settlement on its current or any other terms. If a definitive settlement agreement is executed and District Court approval is obtained, the settlement would resolve all claims asserted against the Company in the litigation.

The reserve for the settlement will significantly impact the Company’s earnings to be reported for the first fiscal quarter of 2026 which the Company expects to release next week. Although the agreement was not reached until after the quarter ended, accounting rules require that the charge be taken in the first quarter. The Company expects that the amount of the settlement will be fully tax deductible.

The Company expects to report earnings on a timely basis on Friday, May 1 and file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 with the SEC at or about the same time.

Company Information

Oppenheimer Holdings Inc., through its operating subsidiaries, is a leading middle market investment bank and full service broker-dealer that is engaged in a broad range of activities in the financial services industry, including retail securities brokerage, institutional sales and trading, investment banking (corporate and public finance), equity and fixed income research, market-making, trust services, and investment advisory and asset management services. With roots tracing back to 1881, the Company is headquartered in New York and has 88 retail branch offices in the United States and has institutional businesses located in London, Tel Aviv, and Hong Kong.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this press release may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. OPY cautions that a number of important factors could cause OPY’s actual future results and other future circumstances to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to the factors identified in “Factors Affecting ‘Forward-Looking Statements’” and Part 1A—“Risk Factors” in OPY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. OPY does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to forward-looking statements made by it to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date hereof or the occurrence of unanticipated events.
2

FAQ

What litigation is Oppenheimer (OPY) settling in this 8-K?

Oppenheimer is settling a class-action lawsuit over its cash sweep program, titled Liberty Capital Group v. Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. The case involves how idle client cash was swept into FDIC-insured bank deposit accounts between 2022 and final court approval.

How much will Oppenheimer (OPY) pay under the cash sweep settlement?

Oppenheimer’s subsidiary agreed to pay $70 million to fully settle the class-action claims. The amount will be deposited into an escrow account ten business days after preliminary approval by the District Court, assuming the court grants that approval.

How does the $70 million settlement compare to potential damages in OPY’s case?

During discovery, plaintiffs indicated they would seek class damages in excess of $440 million. By agreeing to a $70 million settlement, Oppenheimer significantly limits its potential financial exposure relative to what plaintiffs had signaled.

Will the Oppenheimer (OPY) settlement affect upcoming earnings?

Yes. Oppenheimer will record a reserve for the full $70 million settlement in its first fiscal quarter of 2026, substantially impacting reported earnings. The company expects the settlement amount to be fully tax deductible under applicable tax rules.

Is the Oppenheimer cash sweep settlement already final and approved?

No. The agreement is currently a binding Settlement Term Sheet that remains subject to negotiation of definitive documents and both preliminary and final approval by the District Court. There is no assurance the court will approve the settlement as proposed.

What time period does the OPY cash sweep settlement cover?

The disputed period in the case begins in 2022 and runs through the date when the District Court grants final approval of the settlement. The settlement is intended to resolve all claims based on that time frame, if fully approved by the court.

Filing Exhibits & Attachments

5 documents