[SCHEDULE 13G/A] Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. SEC Filing
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Rocket Pharmaceuticals disclosure shows that Maverick-affiliated entities and Lee S. Ainslie beneficially hold 8,363,813 shares of common stock, equal to 7.8% of the company based on 107,737,919 shares outstanding. The reported holdings arise from multiple funds and accounts: Maverick Fund USA, Ltd. (1,686,548 shares); Maverick Fund II, Ltd. (1,727,675); Maverick Long Enhanced Fund, Ltd. (1,930,078); Maverick HP, L.P. (1,726,954); Maverick Long Fund, Ltd. (958,547); and separately managed accounts (334,011).
Maverick is identified as the investment adviser with investment discretion over these client accounts, Maverick Capital Management is the general partner, and Lee S. Ainslie III is the manager. The filing reports no sole voting or dispositive power and shared voting and dispositive power over all 8,363,813 shares, indicating a significant institutional stake without unilateral control.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR Maverick and affiliates hold a material 7.8% stake (8.36M shares), a notable institutional position but not controlling.
The filing documents a substantial passive institutional stake across multiple Maverick funds and managed accounts totaling 8,363,813 shares, representing 7.8% of the outstanding common stock (107,737,919 shares). All power is reported as shared rather than sole, so while this is large enough to warrant attention from investors and the company, it does not convey unilateral voting or disposition control. The structure—advisory relationships and general partner/manager roles—clarifies why beneficial ownership is attributed to both the firm and Mr. Ainslie.
TL;DR A meaningful institutional stake is disclosed, but lack of sole voting power limits immediate governance control.
The Schedule 13G shows coordinated beneficial ownership by Maverick entities and Lee S. Ainslie totaling 8,363,813 shares (7.8%). The report specifies shared voting and dispositive power with no sole authority, implying influence potential via engagement or coalition-building rather than direct control. For governance impact, this position is material enough to matter in activist or engagement scenarios, but the filing does not indicate any group formation, solicitation, or intent to influence control.
FAQ
What percentage of RCKT does Maverick's position represent?
Does this filing indicate an intent to influence control of Rocket Pharmaceuticals?
AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.