STOCK TITAN

Yum! Brands (NYSE: YUM) holders back directors, reject lower special-meeting bar

Filing Impact
(Moderate)
Filing Sentiment
(Neutral)
Form Type
8-K

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Yum! Brands, Inc. reported the results of its Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 14, 2026. All nominated directors were elected, each receiving more votes for than against, with most nominees gaining over 213 million votes in favor.

Shareholders also ratified KPMG LLP as independent auditor for 2026 with about 231.6 million votes in favor and approved, on a non-binding basis, executive compensation with about 212.2 million votes for. A shareholder proposal to reduce the ownership threshold required to call a special meeting was rejected, with approximately 137.8 million votes against.

Positive

  • None.

Negative

  • None.
Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Governance
Results of a shareholder vote on proposals at an annual or special meeting.
Auditor ratification votes for 231,597,167 votes KPMG LLP ratified as independent auditor for 2026
Say-on-pay votes for 212,220,747 votes Non-binding advisory approval of executive compensation
Special-meeting proposal votes against 137,798,232 votes Shareholder proposal to reduce ownership threshold not approved
Broker non-votes on say-on-pay 23,986,264 shares Non-binding vote on executive compensation
Votes for director Kathleen K. Oberg 221,536,778 votes Director election at May 14, 2026 annual meeting
Votes for director Chris Turner 220,641,625 votes Director election at May 14, 2026 annual meeting
broker non-votes financial
"the number of abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to each matter"
Broker non-votes occur when a brokerage firm is unable to vote on a shareholder’s behalf during a company election or decision because the shareholder has not given specific voting instructions, and the broker is not allowed or chooses not to vote on certain matters. They are important because they can affect the outcome of votes, especially when the results are close, by effectively reducing the total number of votes cast.
non-binding advisory vote regulatory
"The proposal to approve, by non-binding advisory vote, the executive compensation"
A non-binding advisory vote is a shareholder vote that expresses investors’ opinion on a proposal (such as executive pay, corporate policy, or governance practices) but does not legally force the company to act. Think of it like a customer survey: it signals whether owners approve or disapprove and can pressure boards and managers to change course, so investors watch the result as an indicator of governance risk and potential future shifts in company strategy or leadership.
independent auditor financial
"The proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditor for 2026"
An independent auditor is an outside, qualified accounting professional or firm that examines a company's financial records and controls to determine whether its financial statements are accurate and prepared according to accepted accounting rules. Like a neutral referee or home inspector, the auditor issues a report that gives investors confidence (or raises red flags) about the reliability of the numbers, which affects assessments of risk, valuation and investment decisions.
special meeting regulatory
"shareholder proposal regarding reducing the ownership threshold for shareholders to call a special meeting"
A special meeting is a shareholder gathering called outside the regular annual meeting to decide on urgent or specific corporate matters, such as mergers, major asset sales, changes to the board, or shareholder proposals. It matters to investors because decisions made there can quickly alter a company’s strategy, ownership or value—like a sudden boardroom decision that changes the game—so shareholders may need to vote, adjust holdings, or reassess risk based on the outcome.
emerging growth company regulatory
"Emerging growth company The following is a brief description"
An emerging growth company is a recently public or smaller public firm that qualifies for temporary, lighter regulatory and disclosure rules to reduce the cost and effort of being public. For investors, it means the company may provide less historical financial detail and face fewer reporting requirements than larger firms, so it can grow more quickly but also carries higher uncertainty—like buying a promising early-stage product with fewer user reviews.
0001041061false00010410612026-05-142026-05-14

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)

May 14, 2026
________________________
YUM! BRANDS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Commission File Number 1-13163

North Carolina13-3951308
(State or other jurisdiction of(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation)Identification No.)
1441 Gardiner Lane,Louisville,Kentucky40213
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(502)874-8300
Former name or former address, if changed since last report:N/A

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act
 Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
 Common Stock, no par valueYUMNew York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐



Item 5.07Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The following is a brief description of each matter voted upon at the YUM! Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 14, 2026, as well as the number of votes cast for or against each matter and the number of abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to each matter.

1.The election of the following directors, who will serve until their respective successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier death or resignation:
DirectorForAgainstAbstainBroker non-votes
Paget L. Alves218,273,4613,595,796245,65823,986,264
M. Brett Biggs218,442,8783,439,853232,18423,986,264
Brian C. Cornell213,424,3138,461,315229,28723,986,264
Tanya L. Domier220,783,9351,119,685211,29523,986,264
Susan Doniz219,250,2182,647,725216,97223,986,264
Mirian M. Graddick-Weir208,897,96212,999,923217,03023,986,264
Thomas C. Nelson213,485,2628,394,334235,31923,986,264
Kathleen K. Oberg221,536,778364,109214,02823,986,264
P. Justin Skala220,027,1401,848,766239,00923,986,264
Chris Turner220,641,6251,239,052234,23823,986,264
Annie Young-Scrivner219,247,0822,655,892211,94123,986,264

2.The proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditor for 2026 was approved based upon the following votes:
Votes for approval231,597,167
Votes against14,177,562
Abstentions326,450
There were no broker non-votes for this item.

3.The proposal to approve, by non-binding advisory vote, the executive compensation of the Company's named executive officers was approved based upon the following votes:
Votes for approval212,220,747
Votes against9,209,495
Abstentions684,673
Broker non-votes23,986,264

4.The shareholder proposal regarding reducing the ownership threshold for shareholders to call a special meeting was not approved based upon the following votes:
Votes for approval83,507,337
Votes against137,798,232
Abstentions809,346
Broker non-votes23,986,264





SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


   YUM! BRANDS, INC. 
   (Registrant) 



Date:May 19, 2026 /s/ Larry Derenge 
   Vice President and Associate General Counsel 
    


FAQ

What did YUM (Yum! Brands) shareholders approve at the 2026 annual meeting?

Shareholders approved all director nominees, ratified KPMG LLP as independent auditor for 2026, and supported executive compensation in a non-binding vote. Each director received strong majority support, and the auditor ratification passed with over 231 million votes for and no broker non-votes.

How did YUM shareholders vote on executive compensation in 2026?

Shareholders approved Yum! Brands’ executive compensation in a non-binding advisory vote, with 212,220,747 votes for, 9,209,495 against, and 684,673 abstentions. There were 23,986,264 broker non-votes, meaning those shares were not voted on the pay proposal but were counted for quorum.

Was the YUM shareholder proposal on special meeting thresholds approved?

The shareholder proposal to reduce the ownership threshold to call a special meeting was not approved. It received 83,507,337 votes for, 137,798,232 votes against, and 809,346 abstentions, along with 23,986,264 broker non-votes, indicating clear opposition from voting shareholders to changing the threshold.

Who is Yum! Brands’ independent auditor for 2026 and how was it ratified?

KPMG LLP was ratified as Yum! Brands’ independent auditor for 2026. The ratification received 231,597,167 votes for, 14,177,562 against, and 326,450 abstentions. There were no broker non-votes on this item, reflecting strong overall shareholder support for retaining KPMG.

Did all Yum! Brands (YUM) director nominees get elected in 2026?

All listed director nominees were elected to the board, each receiving more votes for than against. For example, Kathleen K. Oberg received 221,536,778 votes for and 364,109 against, while others like Chris Turner and Tanya L. Domier also secured substantial majority approval from shareholders.

Filing Exhibits & Attachments

3 documents